QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.108175v1 319/1/360    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gyamfi, M. A. Articles by Wan, Y.-J. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gyamfi, M. A. Articles by Wan, Y.-J. Y.

METABOLISM, TRANSPORT, AND PHARMACOGENOMICS

The Role of Retinoid X Receptor in Regulating Alcohol Metabolism

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Received May 20, 2006; accepted July 6, 2006.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
There is substantial overlap in retinol and alcohol metabolism. Mice that lack retinoic acid (RA) receptor retinoid X receptor (RXR) expression in the liver are more susceptible to alcoholic liver disease. To investigate the interaction between RXR and alcoholic liver disease, ethanol metabolism was studied in hepatocyte RXR-deficient [RXR knockout (KO)] mice. Hepatocyte RXR deficiency resulted in a significant increase in hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity, ADH1 protein, but not Adh1 mRNA. Polysomal distribution analysis indicated that more polysome-associated Adh1 mRNA was present in the mutant mouse livers, suggesting increased ADH1 protein synthesis in RXR KO mice compared with wild-type mice. However, ADH2 and ADH3 enzyme activities were not affected by RXR deficiency. Although ethanol clearance was increased, acetaldehyde elimination was reduced when RXR was not expressed in the liver. Both mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) 2 and cytosolic ALDH activities were reduced in the mutant mice compared with the wild type. Western blot analysis revealed that the levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2 were decreased in the mutant mice. Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction indicated that liver Aldh1a1 mRNA level was also reduced due to the lack of RXR expression. Thus, RXR differentially affects ADH and ALDH activity, leading to an increase in alcohol clearance, but a reduction in acetaldehyde elimination. In addition, CYP2E1 as well as mitochondrial and cytosolic glutathione S-transferase activities were significantly lower in RXR KO mice than in wild-type mice. Our results reveal the central role of RXR in ethanol metabolism.

Ethanol is metabolized in the liver by enzymes located in different subcellular compartments of the hepatocyte. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH or Adh), an NAD⁺-dependent enzyme located in the hepatic cytosol, catalyzes the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde, a potent toxicant that accounts for most of the toxic effects of ethanol (Niemela et al., 1995). Acetaldehyde produced from ethanol is further converted to the nontoxic acetate by a mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH or Aldh) (Sladek et al., 1989). Both ADH and ALDH exist as a family of isozymes in mammals (Cheung et al., 2003). In the mouse, ADH exists as four major classes, with ADH1, ADH2, and ADH3 predominantly localized in liver (Cheung et al., 2003). Of these isozymes, only ADH1 has a low K_m for ethanol and is responsible for hepatic ethanol clearance (Julia et al., 1987). ADH4, absent in normal liver, has a high K_m value for ethanol, but it does play a major role in extrahepatic ethanol metabolism, especially in the stomach (Farres et al., 1994). The most important enzymes for acetaldehyde oxidation are mitochondrial ALDH2 and cytosolic ALDH (Sladek et al., 1989; Cheung et al., 2003). ADH1, ADH3, and ADH4 also exhibit retinol dehydrogenase activity and participate in retinol (vitamin A) metabolism to form retinaldehyde. Catalytic efficiency studies indicate that ADH1 prefers all-trans-retinol as a substrate, whereas ADH4 has a high affinity for 9-cis-retinol (Yang et al., 1994; Allali-Hassani et al., 1998). Oxidation of retinaldehyde to retinoic acid is performed by the cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH1A3 (Duester et al., 2003).

RXR is a nuclear receptor for 9-cis-retinoic acid (RA), the metabolite of vitamin A (Mangelsdorf et al., 1992). RXR also dimerizes with retinoic acid receptors (RAR, -, and -), which are the receptors for all-trans-RA, the active metabolite of vitamin A. RA signaling pathways are involved in many biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation, morphogenesis, homeostasis, and metabolism (Mangelsdorf et al., 1993). Excessive vitamin A consumption decreases 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and SAMe levels, potentiating alcohol-induced toxicity (Fell and Steele, 1986; Lee et al., 2004). Moreover, ethanol intoxication during embryogenesis leads to fetal alcohol syndrome, characterized by craniofacial defects of the eyes, upper lips, and jaw due to improper development of the cranial neural crest (Deltour et al., 1996). Likewise, severe vitamin A deficiency during pregnancy results in eye defects and cleft face in embryos (Morriss-Kay and Sokolova, 1996). Thus, alcohol toxicity and vitamin A deficiency cause similar congenital abnormalities.

Besides ADH, another enzyme that affects ethanol action is cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), which oxidizes both ethanol and vitamin A (Liu et al., 2001). Oxidative stress resulting in the depletion of cellular biomolecules such as GSH, vitamin E, and SAMe is considered one of the mechanisms responsible for alcohol-induced liver injury (Rouach et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2004). Previously, we have shown that reduced SAMe and GSH levels in RXR KO mice potentiate alcohol-induced liver injury (Dai et al., 2003). To understand the role of the receptor for retinoic acid in alcohol metabolism and alcoholic liver disease, it is important to examine the effect of RXR deficiency on alcohol-metabolizing enzymes.

Therefore, the current study focuses on the role of RXR in the alcohol detoxification pathway assessed by metabolic activities, immunoblot, and semiquantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We also compared ethanol and acetaldehyde metabolic and elimination rates in wild-type and RXR KO mice. Our results provide evidence that RXR deficiency leads to increased ADH activity and decreased ALDH2 and cytosolic ALDH activities. These changes resulted in a difference between wild-type and RXR KO mice with regard to ethanol and acetaldehyde clearance from the blood and liver. The accumulation of acetaldehyde after ethanol ingestion in RXR KO mice may in part explain why hepatocyte RXR KO mice are more susceptible to ethanol-induced liver damage than wild-type mice.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Animals. Mice carrying the RXR mutation in hepatocytes have been described previously (Wan et al., 2000). The animals used in all the experiments were age-matched male wild-type and hepatocyte RXR KO mice. The mice were housed at 22°C with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle and provided food and water ad libitum. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Kansas University Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Preparation of Mitochondria, Cytosol, and Microsomes. Mice were sacrificed by decapitation. Cytosolic, mitochondrial, and microsomal fractions were separated from fresh liver tissue. In brief, the liver was homogenized in 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH, 7.0, containing 0.25 M sucrose and 0.3 mM EDTA. The crude homogenate was centrifuged at 600g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was centrifuged further at 5000g for 10 min at 4°C to give a mitochondrial pellet and a supernatant containing the cytosolic and microsomal fractions. The mitochondrial pellet was washed twice, kept at -80°C, and used for ALDH enzyme activity as well as Western blot analysis. The supernatant was centrifuged at 105,000g for 60 min at 4°C to obtain the cytosolic and microsomal fractions. The pellet (microsomes) was further homogenized in 0.15 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH, 8.0, and centrifuged at 105,000g for 60 min at 4°C to give one-washed liver microsomes for CYP2E1 enzyme activity assay. The cytosol and microsomes were immediately frozen and kept at -80°C until use. The supernatant (cytosol) was used for ADH, ALDH, and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme activity and immunoblot assay.

Measurements of ADH, ALDH, GST, and CYP2E1 Enzyme Activities. ADH isozyme activities in the liver cytosol were measured by detecting the reduction of NAD⁺ at 340 nm. ADH1 activity was measured with 0.3 mM NAD⁺ and 10 mM ethanol in 0.1 M glycine-NaOH buffer, pH 10.5, as described previously (Martras et al., 2004). The ADH2 activity was determined with 5 mM benzyl alcohol and 2.4 mM NAD⁺ in 0.1 M glycine-NaOH buffer, pH, 10, as reported previously (Stromberg et al., 2004). ADH3, identical to glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase, is the only ADH that exhibits high specificity for S-hydroxymethylglutathione (HMGSH) (Holmquist and Vallee, 1991). The oxidation of HMGSH, the actual substrate formed spontaneously from GSH and formaldehyde, was therefore measured as an index of ADH3 activity. The assay mixture contained 1 mM formaldehyde, 1 mM GSH, 2.4 mM NAD⁺, and cytosol in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, as described previously (Hedberg et al., 2000). During assay, GSH and formaldehyde were allowed to equilibrate for 2 min in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, at 25°C before the addition of NAD⁺ and cytosol. The formaldehyde oxidation rate of each sample was used as background and subtracted from that obtained for HMGSH. The mitochondrial and cytosolic ALDH activity was measured by detecting the reduction of NAD⁺ at 340 nm as described previously with a minor modification (Tottmar et al., 1973; Lindahl and Evces, 1984). The reaction mixture contained 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer, pH 8.8, 0.5 mM NAD⁺, 0.1 mM pyrazole, and 100 µMor5mM acetaldehyde or propionaldehyde. When assaying mitochondrial fractions, the reaction mixture also contained 2 µM rotenone. Total GST activity in the cytosol and mitochondria was measured using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as described previously (Habig et al., 1974). CYP2E1 activity in the liver microsomes was estimated colorimetrically by measuring the hydroxylation of p-nitrophenol to 4-nitrocathecol (Reinke and Moyer, 1985).

Western Blot. Cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins (10 µg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gels, electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted with anti-mouse ADH1 antibody (kindly supplied by Dr. Michael Felder, Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC), ALDH2 antibody (kindly supplied by Dr. Henry Weiner, Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN), ALDH1A1 antibody (EMD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), and ALDH1A2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Blots were blocked at 4°C with Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) plus 5% dry nonfat milk, and antibodies were diluted in TBST plus 1% dry nonfat milk. Blots were incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and washed three times in TBST. Blots were then incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) or donkey anti-goat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) secondary antibodies diluted in TBST plus 1% milk for 1 h at room temperature. Following probing, blots were stripped and reprobed for -actin with monoclonal anti--actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Proteins were viewed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL). Protein contents in the mitochondria, cytosol, and microsomes were determined by the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976).

RNA Isolation and Semiquantitative RT-PCR. Male wild-type and hepatocyte RXR KO mice (10 weeks old; n = 5) were used. Total RNA was isolated from frozen liver tissues by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration and quality were determined spectrophotometrically at 260 nm and by the A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ ratio, respectively. RNA integrity was assessed by comparing the relative intensities of the 28S and 18S rRNA bands by electrophoresis in an agarose 1.2% (w/v) gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde. Quantification of cDNA-specific mRNA for individual wild-type and RXR KO mouse livers was accomplished by semiquantitative RT-PCR. In brief, total RNA (5 µg) was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II first-strand synthesis (Invitrogen). cDNA (2 µl) was amplified in a total reaction volume of 50 µl in a PTC-200 Peltier thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA) in the presence of specific primers to Adh1, Adh2, Adh3, Adh4, Aldh1a1, and Aldh2. Primer pairs (Table 1) were designed using Primer 3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu). In addition, primers specific to -actin were included in each reaction to serve as an internal control. The ratio of specific primers to -actin primer was 5:1. The PCR procedure consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 15 to 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 2 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. To ensure that the amplification remained within the linear range, PCR with each set of primers was performed at three to five different cycles. The number of cycles found to be optimal for each gene was as follows: Adh1, 25; Adh2, 30; Adh3, 30; Adh4, 30; Aldh1a1, 25; and Aldh2, 28.

Isolation of Polysomes and Northern Analysis. Polysomal distribution of Adh1 mRNA in wild-type and RXR KO mouse livers was performed as described previously with some modification (Taylor and Schimke, 1973). After overnight fasting, mice were sacrificed and the liver was immediately excised. The liver (1 g) was homogenized in 5 volumes of polysome buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl₂, 25 mM NaCl, and 0.14 M sucrose) containing 100 µg/ml heparin. The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,600g for 10 min at 4°C, and the pellet was discarded. After addition of 1 volume of a solution of 10% Triton X-100 and 10% sodium deoxycholate to 9 volumes of the supernatant, the resultant solution was rehomogenized. A 1.0 ml of this mixture was layered over a 10 to 60% sucrose gradient made in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl₂, and 25 mM NaCl. Ultracentrifugation was carried out at 4°C and 288,000g for 105 min in a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). After centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated into 10 fractions from the bottom (1 ml/fraction). The absorbance of the gradients at 254 nm was determined for each fraction using a Cary 50 Bio spectrophotometer (Varian Analytical Instruments, Walnut Creek, CA). The RNA in each fraction was extracted using the TRIzol reagent. Because heparin, which potently inhibits PCR, was present in the polysomal gradients, Northern analysis, but not RT-PCR, was used to quantify the Adh1 mRNA in each fraction. An equal volume of total RNA extracted from polysomal fractions was separated by electrophoresis in an agarose 1.2% (w/v) gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde. RNA integrity was assessed by comparing the relative intensities of the 28S and 18S rRNA bands. RNA was transferred to a nylon membrane by capillary blotting in 10x standard saline citrate and cross-linked by UV irradiation. The cDNA fragment specific to mouse Adh1 was synthesized by RT-PCR and used as a probe. Probe labeling and hybridization were performed as described previously (Wan et al., 2003).

Determination of Alcohol and Acetaldehyde Levels in Blood and Liver. Male wild-type and hepatocyte RXR KO mice (10 weeks old) were used. Ethanol was administered as a single dose (3 g/kg) at a concentration of 35% (v/v) by gastric intubation after an overnight starvation. Mice (n = 5) were sacrificed 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after ethanol administration. Blood (collected into heparinized tubes) was either used for blood alcohol level determination by the Analox GL5 alcohol analyzer (Analox Instrument USA Inc., Luneburg, MA) (Ronis et al., 2004) or blood acetaldehyde level determination. For blood alcohol determination, heparinized blood was deproteinized with 6% perchloric acid. The sample was then thoroughly mixed with 1.5 M K₂CO₃ and centrifuged at 2700g for 3 min. The supernatant was collected and used for the determination of ethanol concentration. Blood and liver tissue were placed in sealed vials and stored at -80°C for gas chromatography analysis of acetaldehyde levels. Immediately before analysis, the samples, 100 µl of blood or 100 mg of liver tissue were warmed at 50°C for 40 min. Headspace gas (100 µl) from each vial was removed through a septum on the cap with a tight syringe and transferred to the injection system on a Varian 3400 gas chromatography equipped with flame ionization detector. Acetaldehyde was separated on a 30-m capillary column (SP 2330; Supelco, Bellfonte, PA) with an inner diameter of 0.25 mm. The temperature was held isothermally at 50°C, and helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 6 ml/min. Under the specified conditions, separation of acetaldehyde from other compounds was complete within 2.5 min with a retention time of 1.9 min. Individual peaks were integrated with a programmable Star Chromatography Work Station, version 6.0 (Varian Analytical Instruments). Quantification of acetaldehyde was achieved by calibrating the gas chromatography peak area against those from headspace samples of authentic acetaldehyde standards.

Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as means ± S.D. Statistical analysis was performed by the Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
ADH1 enzyme activity was significantly increased in the livers of RXR KO mice compared with wild-type mice (Table 2). Among the ADH isozymes, ADH1 has been suggested to play a major role in hepatic ethanol clearance due to its low K_m for ethanol (Julia et al., 1987). Therefore, we examined the expression of the ADH1 protein in liver cytosol of wild-type and RXR KO mice. In agreement with the increased ADH1 activity (1.2-fold), ADH1 protein level was higher (2.5-fold) in RXR KO mice than wild-type mice (Fig. 1a). ADH2 and ADH3 enzyme activities were not different between RXR KO mice and wild-type mice (Table 2). Using semiquantitative RT-PCR, the levels of Adh1, Adh2, Adh3, and Adh4 mRNAs in the livers were not different between the mutant and wild-type mice (Fig. 1b). Table 1 shows the size of the products obtained after RT-PCR. All the amplifications were within the linear range, and the data were reproduced more than three times. The low expression of the Adh4 mRNA observed in the liver (Fig. 1b) agrees with previous reports showing the expression of ADH4 is extrahepatic and is very low in normal liver (Farres et al., 1994).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2 Hepatic ethanol-metabolizing enzyme activities in wild type and RXR KO mice Data represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. ADH expression in wild-type (WT) and RXR KO mice. Cytosolic protein (10 µg/lane) was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel, electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and incubated with mouse anti-ADH1 antibody as described under Materials and Methods. a, densitometry analysis was performed by the Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1 Software and plotted after normalizing with -actin. b, RT-PCR was performed using 5 µg of total RNA extracted from wild-type and RXR KO mice (n = 5). Specific Adh1, Adh2, Adh3, and Adh4 () cDNAs were coamplified with -actin () within the linear range. The amplified products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels. ***, P < 0.001 versus wild-type mice (n = 4).

Since Adh1 mRNA level remained unchanged, we hypothesized that increased ADH1 protein synthesis might account for the elevated ADH1 protein level in the mutant mice. To investigate this, we isolated polysomes from wild-type and RXR KO mice. The absorbance profile of fractions collected after sucrose gradient was used to designate the fractions into polysomes and monosomes (Fig. 2a). Northern analysis revealed that fractions 2 to 5, obtained from the RXR KO mice, which represented the actively translated polysomal fractions (polysomes), were found to contain higher levels of Adh1 mRNA (2.8-fold) compared with the same fractions isolated from wild-type mice (Fig. 2, b and c). This finding indicates increased translation of Adh1 protein in the mutant mice. We observed that although the -fold changes at the mRNA level (2.8-fold) (Fig. 2, b and c) and protein level (2.5-fold) (Fig. 1a) were similar, the -fold change in ADH1 activity was only 1.2 (Table 2).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Polysome profiles and distribution of Adh1 mRNA after sucrose density gradient fractionation of WT and RXR KO mice liver polysomal RNA. Equal amounts of postnuclear supernatants obtained from liver homogenates were applied to 10 to 60% linear sucrose gradients and subjected to centrifugation as described under Materials and Methods. a, absorbance profiles at 254 nm of fractions collected from the bottom (B) to the top (T) after sucrose density gradient fractionation of WT and RXR KO mice. Gradients were collected in 10 fractions. b, representative Northern blot analysis of polysomal distribution of Adh1 mRNA of WT and RXR KO mice after sucrose density gradient fractionation. Densitometry analysis was performed by the Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1 Software. Quantitative analysis of Adh1 mRNA in polysomal fractions (2-5) of WT and RXR KO mice (c). The data represent mean values of two separate experiments.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3 Hepatic ALDH activities in different subcellular fractions in wild type and RXR KO mice Data represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 4-5).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. ALDH expression in WT and RXR KO mice. Cytosolic or mitochondrial proteins (10 µg/lane) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel, electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted with mouse anti-ALDH1A1, anti-ALDH1A2, and anti-ALDH2 antibodies. Quantitative analysis of ALDH1A1 (a), ALDH1A2 (b), and ALDH2 (c) protein in WT and RXR KO mice was plotted after normalizing with -actin. A representative Western blot of each protein is shown below the plots. *, P < 0.05 versus wild-type mice (n = 4).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Expression of Aldh1a1, and Aldh2, mRNA of wild-type and RXR KO mice. RT-PCR was performed using 5 µg of total RNA extracted from wild-type and RXR KO mice. Primers, specific for Aldh1a1, and Aldh2 (), were included in a PCR to coamplify with -actin primers (). The amplified products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels. Densitometry analysis was performed by the Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1 Software. Quantitative analysis of Aldh1a1 (a), and Aldh2 (b) mRNA was plotted after normalizing with -actin. A representative PCR gel of each mRNA is shown below each plot. *, P < 0.05 versus wild type (n = 5).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 4 Hepatic glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities in different subcellular fractions in wild type and RXR KO mice using CDNB as substrate Data represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

To study the impact of changes in ADH and ALDH activities in RXR KO mice, ethanol and acetaldehyde elimination rates were determined after a single dose of ethanol by intragastric administration. The concentrations of ethanol and acetaldehyde in the blood and liver of mice were measured at different times. RXR KO mice exhibited enhanced blood ethanol clearance compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 5). The blood ethanol levels in the RXR KO mice were significantly lower at 1, 2, and 4 h after ethanol administration compared with wild-type mice. However, a comparison of blood acetaldehyde clearance between mutant and wild-type mice demonstrated that RXR KO mice had a defect in the clearing of acetaldehyde (Fig. 6a). Likewise, liver acetaldehyde clearance was slower in RXR KO mice than wild-type mice (Fig. 6b).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Blood ethanol elimination in WT and RXR KO mice. Ethanol (a single dose; 35%; 3 g/kg) was administered by gastric intubation after an overnight starvation. Mice (n = 5) were sacrificed 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after the ethanol administration. Blood alcohol levels were determined by the Analox GL5 alcohol analyzer. Results are means ± S.D. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 versus wild-type mice.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Blood and hepatic acetaldehyde elimination in wild-type and RXR KO mice. Ethanol was administered to the mice as described in the legend to Fig. 4. Mice (n = 5) were sacrificed 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after the ethanol administration. Acetaldehyde level in blood (a) and liver (b) were determined by gas chromatography. Results are means ± S.D. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 versus wild-type mice.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In this study, we assessed the levels of expression of ADH, ALDH, CYP2E1, and GST enzymes in wild-type and RXR KO mice. The data demonstrated that RXR deficiency results in an induction of ADH activity through translational regulation of the ADH protein. In addition, ALDH, CYP2E1, and GST activities are reduced in the mutant mice. Furthermore, we demonstrated that RXR KO mice have elevated blood acetaldehyde levels, which remained high for 3 h after ethanol administration. In contrast, acetaldehyde levels peaked at 1 h in the wild-type mice and were low 3 h after ethanol administration.

The toxicity of ethanol is mediated by acetaldehyde, a highly reactive molecule produced from ethanol by the cytosolic enzyme ADH (Niemela et al., 1995). Under normal circumstances, acetaldehyde is rapidly formed in the liver, but it is also immediately oxidized by ALDH to acetate. Hence, little or no acetaldehyde enters the blood. Thus, the high acetaldehyde levels we observed in RXR KO mice, most probably resulted from the increased rate of ethanol metabolism in the liver of these mutant mice by ADH. Indeed, our results revealed that both hepatic ADH enzyme activity and ADH1 protein were higher in RXR KO mice compared with wild-type mice. Our findings provide in vivo evidence that the level of ADH1 expression regulated by RXR is an important factor in determining the rate of ethanol elimination and influences the risk for alcohol-induced liver injury (Bosron et al., 1993). Furthermore, the cyclic pattern of blood and urine ethanol levels has been suggested to involve the induction of ADH1 by ethanol to facilitate ethanol elimination (Badger et al., 2000).

In addition to ADH, ethanol is known to be metabolized by CYP2E1 to produce acetaldehyde (Guengerich et al., 1991). CYP2E1 activity could affect the rate of acetaldehyde formation. Our previous study revealed that the basal level of CYP2E1 mRNA was not different between RXR KO mice and wild-type mice (Cai et al., 2003). However, our current study shows that CYP2E1 activity was significantly decreased in RXR KO mice. Hence, the observed increase in ethanol clearance in RXR KO mice does not seem to be related to CYP2E1 activity.

It was also observed that hepatic RXR deficiency did not change Adh1, Adh2, Adh3, and Adh4 mRNA levels. This finding suggests that, the increase in ADH activity in the RXR KO mice was due to an increase in ADH1 protein without affecting Adh1 gene transcription. In a recent report, leptin was found to increase both ADH activity and ADH protein without affecting Adh mRNA (Mezey et al., 2005). Although leptin did not affect ADH protein degradation, it enhanced ADH protein synthesis through translational initiation factors such as eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2, eIF2B activity, and the eIF4E-eIF4G complex formation (Mezey et al., 2005). A post-transcriptional mechanism is likely to be involved in the increase in ADH activity found in the C57BL/6J mice (Tussey and Felder, 1989). Leptin level is also increased in RXR KO mice (Wan et al., 2003). Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the observed increase in ADH activity and ADH1 protein in RXR KO mice might involve increased protein synthesis due to serum leptin induction in these mutant mice. Indeed, using polysomal distribution analysis, our results indicate that RXR deficiency increased Adh1 mRNA association with polysomes, suggesting increased ADH1 protein synthesis in the mutant relative to wild-type mice.

In the human liver, mitochondrial (low K_m) ALDH2 oxidizes most of the ethanol-derived acetaldehyde; however, in rodents both mitochondrial and cytosolic ALDH isozymes are important in acetaldehyde oxidation (Klyosov et al., 1996). The hepatic ALDH activity in alcoholics and rodents has been suggested as rate-limiting for hepatic oxidation of acetaldehyde (Enomoto et al., 1991). Our results showed elevated blood and hepatic acetaldehyde levels in RXR KO compared with wild-type mice. Furthermore, both mitochondrial and cytosolic ALDH activities are significantly lower in RXR KO compared with wild-type mice, which may result in accumulation of acetaldehyde following ethanol ingestion by the RXR KO mice. Our results revealed a marked decrease in cytosolic ALDH activity compared with mitochondrial ALDH2 in the mutant mice, confirming an earlier observation that mouse cytosolic ALDH1 has a high affinity for acetaldehyde and is an important mediator of alcohol and acetaldehyde metabolism (Smolen et al., 1981; Algar and Holmes, 1986). Consistent with the decrease in the cytosolic ALDH activity and protein levels, Aldh1a1 mRNA was decreased in RXR KO mice more than wild-type mice. Hence, the reduction of ALDH expression in RXR KO mice might be regulated at the level of transcription. However, ALDH2 expression was not changed in the mutant mice, suggesting that the decrease in ALDH2 activity without a change in protein and mRNA level might be due to modification of the ALDH2 molecule, which leads to a decrease in substrate binding or catalysis. Therefore, it is persuasive to suggest that lower ALDH activity together with higher ADH1 activity in livers of RXR KO mice may at least in part be responsible for the higher blood and liver acetaldehyde levels observed in these mutant mice after ethanol administration. There is substantial overlap in retinol and alcohol metabolism; therefore, these changes in ADH1 and ALDH enzyme activities will not only affect retinoid metabolism but also contribute to alcohol toxicity in the mutant mice. Since ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2 have retinaldehyde dehydrogenase activity and are involved in the synthesis of retinoic acid, it is of interest to examine the contribution of accumulated levels of retinaldehyde on alcohol toxicity in RXR KO mice.

The human ALDH2 promoter contains a retinoid response element with the potential to bind retinoid acid receptors (Pinaire et al., 2003). It has therefore been suggested that retinoic acid, a metabolite of vitamin A, is important for ALDH2 expression (Crabb et al., 2001). We observed that cytosolic ALDH activity, ALDH1A1, and ALDH1A2 proteins, and Aldh1a1 mRNA were decreased in RXR KO mice. The effect of RXR deficiency on ALDH1A proteins as well as Aldh1a1 mRNA suggests a diverse but a selective effect of RXR on the ALDH gene. Although the interaction of the ALDH2 promoter with PPAR has also been suggested, the exact regulation of the ALDH2 gene by nuclear receptors has not been fully elucidated (Crabb et al., 2001). The molecular regulation of the Aldh1a1 gene expression by RXR is important and needs further investigation.

Both mitochondrial and cytosolic GSTs were decreased in RXR KO mice, suggesting that conjugation of toxic metabolites with GSH via GSTs is compromised. In addition, we have previously shown that GSH levels are reduced in RXR KO mice (Dai et al., 2003). Hence, RXR deficiency leads to impairment in the detoxification of ethanol through alteration of phase I (ADH and ALDH) as well as the toxic products of ethanol metabolism by phase II (GST) enzyme activities (Fig. 7). Among the nuclear receptors, RXR, which is highly expressed in the liver, is unique in its ability to heterodimerize with other nuclear receptors, thereby controlling many metabolic processes in the liver (Wan et al., 2000). We believe the diverse effect we observed with the RXR deletion in the liver might be due to the promiscuous nature of RXR and that some of these effects might be direct or indirect.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. RXR plays a central role in alcohol metabolism. Hepatocyte RXR deficiency causes a significant increase in both hepatic ADH activity and ADH1 protein, leading to enhanced ethanol clearance. RXR deficiency also decreases mitochondrial ALDH2 and cytosolic ALDH activities. Hence, defective acetaldehyde-oxidizing capacity occurs in RXR KO mice. Decreases in levels of S-adenosylmethionine, GSH, and GST can potentiate the toxic effects of acetaldehyde. These toxic effects may include adduct formation, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lipid peroxidation (LPO). Therefore, RXR KO mice are susceptible to alcohol-induced liver injury.

Together, the results presented reveal differences in wild-type and RXR KO mice with regard to ethanol and acetaldehyde clearance in the blood and liver. Our results strongly suggest a central role of RXR in alcohol metabolism.

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank Dr. Thomas Pazdernik for critical reading of the manuscript.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AA14147 and CA53596.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.106.108175.

ABBREVIATIONS: RXR, retinoid X receptor; SAMe, S-adenosylmethionine; GSH, reduced glutathione; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; ADH or Adh, alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH or Aldh, aldehyde dehydrogenase; RA, retinoic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RT-PCR, reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HMGSH, S-hydroxymethylglutathione; TBST, Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; KO, knockout; eIF, eukaryotic initiation factor; WT, wild type.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7417. E-mail: ywan{at}kumc.edu

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

Algar EM and Holmes RS (1986) Liver cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases from "alcohol-drinking" and "alcohol-avoiding" mouse strains: purification and molecular properties. Int J Biochem 18: 49-56.[CrossRef][Medline]

Allali-Hassani A, Peralba JM, Martras S, Farres J, and Pares X (1998) Retinoids, omega-hydroxyfatty acids and cytotoxic aldehydes as physiological substrates, and H2-receptor antagonists as pharmacological inhibitors, of human class IV alcohol dehydrogenase. FEBS Lett 426: 362-366.[CrossRef][Medline]

Badger TM, Hoog JO, Svensson S, McGehee RE Jr, Fang C, Ronis MJ, and Ingelman-Sundberg M (2000) Cyclic expression of class I alcohol dehydrogenase in male rats treated with ethanol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 274: 684-688.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bosron WF, Ehrig T, and Li TK (1993) Genetic factors in alcohol metabolism and alcoholism. Semin Liver Dis 13: 126-135.[Medline]

Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cai Y, Dai T, Ao Y, Konishi T, Chuang KH, Lue Y, Chang C, and Wan YJ (2003) Cytochrome P450 genes are differentially expressed in female and male hepatocyte retinoid X receptor alpha-deficient mice. Endocrinology 144: 2311-2318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheung C, Davies NG, Hoog JO, Hotchkiss SA, and Smith Pease CK (2003) Species variations in cutaneous alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases may impact on toxicological assessments of alcohols and aldehydes. Toxicology 184: 97-112.[CrossRef][Medline]

Crabb DW, Pinaire J, Chou WY, Sissom S, Peters JM, Harris RA, and Stewart M (2001) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) and the mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) promoter in vitro and in vivo. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25: 945-952.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dai T, Wu Y, Leng AS, Ao Y, Robel RC, Lu SC, French SW, and Wan YJ (2003) RXRalpha-regulated liver SAMe and GSH levels influence susceptibility to alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity. Exp Mol Pathol 75: 194-200.[CrossRef][Medline]

Deltour L, Ang HL, and Duester G (1996) Ethanol inhibition of retinoic acid synthesis as a potential mechanism for fetal alcohol syndrome. FASEB J 10: 1050-1057.[Abstract]

Duester G, Mic FA, and Molotkov A (2003) Cytosolic retinoid dehydrogenases govern ubiquitous metabolism of retinol to retinaldehyde followed by tissue-specific metabolism to retinoic acid. Chem Biol Interact 143-144: 201-210.[CrossRef][Medline]

Enomoto N, Takase S, Yasuhara M, and Takada A (1991) Acetaldehyde metabolism in different aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 genotypes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 15: 141-144.[CrossRef][Medline]

Farres J, Moreno A, Crosas B, Peralba JM, Allali-Hassani A, Hjelmqvist L, Jornvall H, and Pares X (1994) Alcohol dehydrogenase of class IV (sigma sigma-ADH) from human stomach. cDNA sequence and structure/function relationships. Eur J Biochem 224: 549-557.[Medline]

Fell D and Steele RD (1986) Modification of hepatic folate metabolism in rats fed excess retinol. Life Sci 38: 1959-1965.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guengerich FP, Kim DH, and Iwasaki M (1991) Role of human cytochrome P-450 IIE1 in the oxidation of many low molecular weight cancer suspects. Chem Res Toxicol 4: 168-179.[CrossRef][Medline]

Habig WH, Pabst MJ, and Jakoby WB (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem 249: 7130-7139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hedberg JJ, Hoog JO, Nilsson JA, Xi Z, Elfwing A, and Grafstrom RC (2000) Expression of alcohol dehydrogenase 3 in tissue and cultured cells from human oral mucosa. Am J Pathol 157: 1745-1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holmquist B and Vallee BL (1991) Human liver class III alcohol and glutathione dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase are the same enzyme. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 178: 1371-1377.[CrossRef][Medline]

Julia P, Farres J, and Pares X (1987) Characterization of three isoenzymes of rat alcohol dehydrogenase. Tissue distribution and physical and enzymatic properties. Eur J Biochem 162: 179-189.[Medline]

Klyosov AA, Rashkovetsky LG, Tahir MK, and Keung WM (1996) Possible role of liver cytosolic and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases in acetaldehyde metabolism. Biochemistry 35: 4445-4456.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee TD, Sadda MR, Mendler MH, Bottiglieri T, Kanel G, Mato JM, and Lu SC (2004) Abnormal hepatic methionine and glutathione metabolism in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28: 173-181.[Medline]

Lindahl R and Evces S (1984) Comparative subcellular distribution of aldehyde dehydrogenase in rat, mouse and rabbit liver. Biochem Pharmacol 33: 3383-3389.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liu C, Russell RM, Seitz HK, and Wang XD (2001) Ethanol enhances retinoic acid metabolism into polar metabolites in rat liver via induction of cytochrome P4502E1. Gastroenterology 120: 179-189.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mangelsdorf DJ, Borgmeyer U, Heyman RA, Zhou JY, Ong ES, Oro AE, Kakizuka A, and Evans RM (1992) Characterization of three RXR genes that mediate the action of 9-cis retinoic acid. Genes Dev 6: 329-344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, Kakizuka A, Umesono K, and Evans RM (1993) Retinoid receptors. Recent Prog Horm Res 48: 99-121.[Medline]

Martras S, Alvarez R, Martinez SE, Torres D, Gallego O, Duester G, Farres J, de Lera AR, and Pares X (2004) The specificity of alcohol dehydrogenase with cis-retinoids. Activity with 11-cis-retinol and localization in retina. Eur J Biochem 271: 1660-1670.[Medline]

Mezey E, Rennie-Tankersley L, and Potter JJ (2005) Effect of leptin on liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337: 1324-1329.[CrossRef][Medline]

Morriss-Kay GM and Sokolova N (1996) Embryonic development and pattern formation. FASEB J 10: 961-968.[Abstract]

Nakajima T, Kamijo Y, Tanaka N, Sugiyama E, Tanaka E, Kiyosawa K, Fukushima Y, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, and Aoyama T (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha protects against alcohol-induced liver damage. Hepatology 40: 972-980.[CrossRef][Medline]

Niemela O, Parkkila S, Yla-Herttuala S, Villanueva J, Ruebner B, and Halsted CH (1995) Sequential acetaldehyde production, lipid peroxidation, and fibrogenesis in micropig model of alcohol-induced liver disease. Hepatology 22: 1208-1214.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pinaire J, Chou WY, Morton M, You M, Zeng Y, Cho WK, Galli A, Everett L, Breen H, Dumaual N, et al. (2003) Identification of a retinoid receptor response element in the human aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 promoter. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27: 1860-1866.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reinke LA and Moyer MJ (1985) p-Nitrophenol hydroxylation. A microsomal oxidation which is highly inducible by ethanol. Drug Metab Dispos 13: 548-552.[Abstract]

Ronis MJ, Hakkak R, Korourian S, Albano E, Yoon S, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Lindros KO, and Badger TM (2004) Alcoholic liver disease in rats fed ethanol as part of oral or intragastric low-carbohydrate liquid diets. Exp Biol Med 229: 351-360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rouach H, Fataccioli V, Gentil M, French SW, Morimoto M, and Nordmann R (1997) Effect of chronic ethanol feeding on lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in relation to liver pathology. Hepatology 25: 351-355.[Medline]

Sladek NE, Manthey CL, Maki PA, Zhang Z, and Landkamer GJ (1989) Xenobiotic oxidation catalyzed by aldehyde dehydrogenases. Drug Metab Rev 20: 697-720.[Medline]

Smolen A, Wayman AL, Smolen TN, Petersen DR, and Collins AC (1981) Subcellular distribution of hepatic aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in four inbred mouse strains. Comp Biochem Physiol C 69: 199-204.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stromberg P, Svensson S, Berst KB, Plapp BV, and Hoog JO (2004) Enzymatic mechanism of low-activity mouse alcohol dehydrogenase 2. Biochemistry 43: 1323-1328.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tanaka N, Hora K, Makishima H, Kamijo Y, Kiyosawa K, Gonzalez FJ, and Aoyama T (2003) In vivo stabilization of nuclear retinoid X receptor alpha in the presence of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. FEBS Lett 543: 120-124.[CrossRef][Medline]

Taylor JM and Schimke RT (1973) Synthesis of rat liver albumin in a rabbit reticulocyte cell-free protein-synthesizing system. J Biol Chem 248: 7661-7668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tottmar SO, Pettersson H, and Kiessling KH (1973) The subcellular distribution and properties of aldehyde dehydrogenases in rat liver. Biochem J 135: 577-586.[Medline]

Tussey L and Felder MR (1989) Tissue-specific genetic variation in the level of mouse alcohol dehydrogenase is controlled transcriptionally in kidney and posttranscriptionally in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 5903-5907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wan YJ, An D, Cai Y, Repa JJ, Hung-Po Chen T, Flores M, Postic C, Magnuson MA, Chen J, Chien KR, et al. (2000) Hepatocyte-specific mutation establishes retinoid X receptor alpha as a heterodimeric integrator of multiple physiological processes in the liver. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4436-4444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wan YJ, Han G, Cai Y, Dai T, Konishi T, and Leng AS (2003) Hepatocyte retinoid X receptor-alpha-deficient mice have reduced food intake, increased body weight, and improved glucose tolerance. Endocrinology 144: 605-611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang ZN, Davis GJ, Hurley TD, Stone CL, Li TK, and Bosron WF (1994) Catalytic efficiency of human alcohol dehydrogenases for retinol oxidation and retinal reduction. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 18: 587-591.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Gyamfi, L. He, S. W. French, I. Damjanov, and Y.-J. Y. Wan Hepatocyte Retinoid X Receptor {alpha}-Dependent Regulation of Lipid Homeostasis and Inflammatory Cytokine Expression Contributes to Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 443 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.108175v1 319/1/360    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gyamfi, M. A. Articles by Wan, Y.-J. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gyamfi, M. A. Articles by Wan, Y.-J. Y.