![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION, IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, AND ASTHMA
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
Received May 25, 2006; accepted July 10, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-9-tetrahydrocannabinoid (THC), suppress type 1 T-helper 1 (Th1) immunity in a variety of models, including infection with the intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila (Lp). To examine the cellular mechanism of this effect, bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (DCs) were purified from BALB/c mice and studied following infection and drug treatment. DCs infected in vitro with Lp were able to protect mice when injected prior to a lethal Lp infection; however, the immunization potential of the Lp-loaded cells along with Th1 cytokine production was attenuated by THC treatment at the time of in vitro infection. In addition, THC-treated and Lp-loaded DCs were poorly stimulated in culture-primed splenic CD4+ T cells to produce interferon-
; however, this stimulating deficiency was reversed by adding recombinant interleukin (IL)-12p40 protein to the cultures. Moreover, THC treatment inhibited the expression of DC maturation markers, such as major histocompatibility complex class II and costimulatory molecules CD86 and CD40 as determined by flow cytometry and suppressed the Notch ligand, Del-ta4, as determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. However, THC treatment did not affect other DC functions, such as intracellular killing of Lp, determined by colony-forming unit counts of bacteria, and Lp-induced apoptosis, determined by annexin V staining. In conclusion, the data suggest that THC inhibits Th1 activation by targeting essential DC functions, such as IL-12p40 secretion, maturation, and expression of costimulatory and polarizing molecules.
DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells and able to induce and regulate innate and adaptive immune responses. DCs reside in peripheral tissues, capturing and processing pathogens and microbial products and then migrating to lymphoid organs, wherein DCs present these antigens to quiescent T cells (Kapsenberg, 2003
). During this process, the phenotypic characteristics and functions of these cells change, including reduced phagocytic capacity and increased secretion of high levels of immunostimulatory cytokines and expression of MHC and costimulatory molecules (Kapsenberg, 2003
). Furthermore, expression of the Notch ligands, Jagged and/or Delta, are increased, which play a critical role in Th2 and Th1 polarization of naive CD4 T cells (Amsen et al., 2004
). We recently reported that THC treatment significantly suppresses IL-12p40 production in mouse bone marrow-derived DC in culture (Lu et al., 2006
). In the current study, we show that THC treatment of DCs impairs their immunizing and T-helper-polarizing function by inhibiting IL-12 production and the expression of essential costimulatory cell-surface proteins, such as MHC class II, CD86, CD40, and the Notch ligand, Delta4. This suggests that DCs might be a central target of THC-induced immune suppression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation and Treatment of Bone Marrow-Derived Dendritic Cells. Bone marrow cells were collected, as described previously (Lu et al., 2006
), from femurs and tibias of the BALB/c mice at 8 to 12 weeks of age. Isolated cells were adjusted to 1.0 x 106/ml in six-well cell culture plates (Corning Life Sciences, Acton, MA) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (HyClone; Logan, UT), and 10 ng/ml granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (BD Biosciences PharMingen, San Diego, CA). After culture overnight, nonadherent cells were removed and the adherent cells were reincubated with fresh GM-CSF-containing medium for an additional 7 to 9 days, during which time the dendritic cells became nonadherent and were harvested. The purity of the cells was determined by flow-cytometry staining using fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD11b and CD11c (BD Biosciences PharMingen). The purity was
100% CD11b+ and greater than 75% CD11c+ cells. The dendritic cells were either uninfected or infected with Lp at a ratio 10:1 for 30 min. Dendritic cells were then washed twice to remove noninternalized Lp and resuspended to 106 cells/ml and treated with either DMSO (vehicle control) or THC at 10 µM in the culture medium minus GM-CSF for 18 to 48 h. In studies with CD4 T cells, cells were obtained from mice intravenously (i.v.) infected (primed) with a sublethal dose of Lp (7 x 106), and the spleens were removed 5 days postinfection. The T cells were isolated from the splenocytes by mouse T cell enrichment columns (R&D system, Minneapolis, MN), and CD4+ T cells were negatively selected from the purified T cells with CD4 enrichment magnetic bead kits (BD Biosciences PharMingen). Isolated CD4 T cells were then dispensed in 24-well cell culture plates (Corning Life Sciences) and cocultured with DCs (CD4, DC = 10:1) in either the absence or presence of recombinant IL-12p40 (BD Biosciences PharMingen) for 24 h followed by cytokine analysis.
Animal Injections and Tissue Sampling. Mice were immunized i.v. with 0.3 to 0.5 x 106-treated DCs suspended in PBS, and 7 to 9 days later, spleens were isolated from mice. Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes (2 x 106 cells/ml) were cultured with formalinkilled Lp (107/ml) for 24 h, and supernatants were collected for cytokine detection. In contrast, DC-treated mice were challenged i.v. with live Lp (sublethal dose, 7 x 106) diluted in pyrogen-free saline. Spleens were obtained after 24 h, and CFUs of Lp were counted. In other experiments, mice were immunized i.v. with DCs (0.5 x 106) for two or three times at 7-day interval and challenged i.v. with a lethal dose of Lp (1.7-2.0 x 107), and survival of mice was monitored.
Cytokine Detection by ELISA. IL-12p40, IL-4, IL-23, and IL-10 were determined using a sandwich ELISA with antibody pairs from BD Biosciences PharMingen. In 96-well enzyme immunoassay plates (Corning Life Sciences), each well was coated with 50 µl of anti-murine antibody in 0.1 M NaHCO3, pH 8.2 (anti-IL-12 p40 for IL-12p40 and IL-23; 5 µg/ml), or in PBS (anti-IL-4 and anti-IL-10; 2 µg/ml) overnight at 4°C. The wells of the plate were blocked with 150 µl of 3% bovine serum albumin/0.05% Tween 20 in PBS (IL-12p40 and IL-23) or 0.5% bovine serum albumin/0.05% Tween 20 in PBS (IL-4, IL-10) and incubated for 1 h. The culture supernatants or serial dilutions of cytokine standards were added and incubated for 1 to 2 h followed by biotinylated detection antibodies (2 µg/ml, 50 µl) for 1 h and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:1000 in 50 µl) for 30 min. The plates were washed between each addition. The tetramethyl benzidine (Sigma) substrates were developed for 5 to 30 min; the reaction was stopped with 1 N sulfuric acid and read at 450 nm on an Emax microplate reader (Molecular Devices; Menlo Park, CA). The concentrations of sample cytokines were calculated from standard curves that were done for each plate. The levels of IFN-
and IL-12p70 in supernatants were measured using BD OptEIA sets (BD Biosciences PharMingen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Cell Surface Marker Analysis by Flow Cytometry. To evaluate the effects of THC on MHC class II, CD86, and CD40 expression on DCs, cells, either uninfected or infected with Lp, were treated with DMSO or THC at 10 µM for 48 h. After incubation, the cells were treated with fluorochrome-conjugated mAbs (BD Biosciences PharMingen) at 4°C for 30 min and then washed in PBS containing 2% bovine growth serum and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. The following fluorochrome-conjugated mouse mAbs were used for DC surface marker staining: PE-conjugated anti-MHC class II; PE-conjugated anti-CD86; and PE-conjugated anti-CD40 (BD Biosciences PharMingen).
mRNA Measurement by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction. Total RNA was extracted from DC cultures by standard techniques using TriReagent (Sigma) and quantitated using RiboGreen RNA Quantitation Kit (Invitrogen). The extracted RNA was treated with DNase using DNA-free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX). Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse-transcribe with avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). The cDNA product was amplified using TaKaRa TaqDNA polymerase (Fisher; Atlanta, GA). The primer pairs were used as follows: Jagged1, forward primer, 5'-AGAAGTCAGAGTTCAGAGGCGTCC-3', reverse primer, 5'-AGTAGAAGGCTGTCACCAGCAAC-3' (113-bp product); Delta4, forward primer, 5'-AGGTGCCACTTCGGTTACACAG-3', reverse primer, 5'-CAATCACACACTCGTTCCTCTCTTC-3' (123-bp product); and
-actin, forward primer, 5'-ATGGATGACGATATCGCT-3', reverse primer, 5'-ATGAGGTAGTCTGTCAGGT-3' (530-bp product). Polymerase chain reaction was performed in a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY) for 35 cycles (Jagged1 and Delta4) or 28 cycles (
-actin) and 60°C annealing. Polymerase chain reaction products were visualized with ethidium bromide in 2% agarose gels.
Bacteria Growth Determined by CFU Assay. After 24-h infection, spleens from infected mice were homogenized in Hanks' balanced salt solution. In studies of Lp growth in DC cultures, cells were lysed by with 0.1% saponin (Sigma) and diluted in Hanks' balanced salt solution. Homogenized spleens or lysed DCs were plated on buffered charcoal-yeast extract agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 72 h. CFU counts were determined on an AutoCount apparatus (Dynatech Labs, Chantilly, VA).
Cell Viability and Apoptosis Detection. DC viability and apoptosis were detected using the annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate kit (BD Biosciences PharMingen). In brief, uninfected or infected cells (105), treated with DMSO (LpDC/DMSO) or THC (LpDC/THC) at 10 µM for 24 h, were washed twice with PBS and incubated with annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (5 µl) and propidium iodide (5 µl) in binding buffer for 15 min. Early apoptotic cells (annexin V-positive and propidium-negative) and late apoptotic or dead cells (annexin V-positive and propidium-positive) were quantitated by flow cytometry.
Statistical Analysis. Comparisons between groups were performed using the two-tailed Student's t test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as indicating significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
, are critical for the initiation and development of protective immunity against intracellular microbial infections (Pulendran, 2004
compared with splenocytes from mice treated with unloaded DCs. This suggested an up-regulation of Th1 activity in the spleens of mice immunized with Lp-loaded DCs, accounting for their enhanced resistance to Lp infection (see Figs. 1 and 2). However, THC treatment of the DCs inhibited this up-regulation of Th1 activity, suggesting an attenuation of the immunizing potential of these cells (Fig. 3, A and B). IL-4 production by splenocytes was also examined, and we observed that it was suppressed after injection of Lp-loaded DCs, either treated or not with THC (Fig. 3C). This suggested that the increase in Th1 activity in the spleens coincided with a decrease in the Th2 cytokine, IL-4; furthermore, it suggested that THC suppressed Th1 cytokines by mechanisms other than the up-regulation of IL-4. The data overall suggested that THC treatment of antigen-loaded DCs can suppress the immunizing and Th1-polarizing potential of these cells when subsequently injected into mice.
|
THC Suppression of DC IL-12p40 Production Mediates Loss of Th1 Polarization of Lp-Primed CD4+ T Cells. We have previously reported that THC suppresses the production of IL-12p40 in Lp-infected DCs in vitro (Lu et al., 2006
). Therefore, to examine whether this attenuation is responsible for the impaired Th1-polarizing potential of drug-treated and Lp-loaded DCs, cocultures of DCs with T cells from both unprimed and Lp-primed animals were prepared to examine the reconstitution efficacy of exogenously added IL-12p40. Figure 4A shows results from cocultures of Lp-loaded DCs and unprimed CD4 T cells. As reported previously, Lp loading of DCs induces the production of IL-12p40, as detected in culture supernatants by ELISA, and THC treatment of the cells suppressed this response. The addition of unprimed T cells had little effect on IL-12 production (Fig. 4A), and no IFN-
was detected in these cultures (data not shown). We next examined the accessory cell potential of drug-treated DCs in cultures containing Lp-primed T cells and supplied with various concentrations of IL-12p40. Figure 4B shows that DCs plus primed T cells (LpCD4) produced little IL-12p40; however, when DCs were loaded with Lp (LpDC/DMSO), a robust IL-12p40 response was evident, and this was significantly attenuated by THC treatment (LpDC/THC + LpCD4). Of interest was the finding that the addition of recombinant IL-12p40 protein to the cultures increased the IL-12 supernatant concentrations above the amounts added (Fig. 4B). For example, the addition of 0.5 ng/ml recombinant IL-12p40 resulted in an increase of supernatant IL-12 from 2 ng to 6 ng/ml. Furthermore, in contrast to cocultures containing unprimed CD4 T cells, cultures containing primed T cells produced robust amounts of IFN-
but only in the presence of Lp-loaded DCs (Fig. 4C), and this effect was attenuated by THC treatment of the DCs. However, as seen in Fig. 4C, the addition of recombinant IL-12p40 completely restored IFN-
production, suggesting a restoration of Th1 polarization by IL-12. In addition to IL-12p40, we also tested for the presence of IL-12p70, IL-23, and IL-10 in the culture supernatants. These cytokines were not detected, suggesting that the suppression of IL-12p40 from DCs by THC treatment was primarily responsible for the reduced Th1 polarization.
|
THC Suppressed the Expression of DC Maturation and Polarizing Markers. Upon exposure to microbes, DCs are activated to go through a maturation process characterized by an increase in surface expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules contributing to initiation of an effective adaptive immune response (Iwasaki and Medzhitov, 2004
). To determine whether THC modulated these markers, we treated infected and noninfected DCs with either DMSO or THC. After 48 h, we observed by flow cytometry that Lp loading increased the surface expression of CD86 and CD40; however, THC treatment significantly suppressed the expression of both markers (Fig. 5). Regarding MHC class II, we observed that, although expression was high in all three groups, the mean fluorescence intensity of the marker was enhanced in the Lp-infected DCs but was significantly decreased by THC treatment (Fig. 5). From these results, it is possible that drug suppression of T-helper polarization is due in part to a down-modulation of these markers. Other surface proteins, such as Notch receptors, are known to regulate T-cell development (Radtke et al., 2004
). Recently, it was shown that the Notch ligands, such as Delta4 and Jagged1, on DCs promote induction of either Th1 or Th2 activity, respectively (Amsen et al., 2004
). Therefore, we examined relative mRNA expression of these ligands in DCs loaded with Lp and treated with THC or vehicle for 18 h. We observed that message for both ligands was increased in DCs after Lp infection (LpDC/DMSO group; Fig. 6) but that the Delta4 band intensity relative to
-actin intensity was decreased after THC treatment, suggesting that the message level of the Th1-polarizing ligand was decreased by drug treatment.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Next, splenocytes from immunized mice were analyzed for Th1 and Th2 cytokine production in vitro in response to Lp antigens. The results in Fig. 3 showed that, as expected, immunization with Lp-loaded DCs caused an increase in the Th1-polarizing cytokines IL-12p40 and IFN-
; however, this was attenuated in splenocytes from animals immunized with THC-treated DCs, suggesting that drug treatment suppressed DC-polarizing potential. The mechanism surrounding the regulation of Th1 activity by IL-4 is controversial (Swain et al., 1990
; Biedermann et al., 2001
); therefore, we examined for IL-4 production by splenocytes from immunized mice. Figure 3 shows that immunization suppressed IL-4 production; furthermore, immunization with THC-treated cells had no effect on this suppression. These findings suggest several things. First, as expected, immunization by Lp led to a decrease in IL-4-producing splenocytes as confirmation of Th1 polarization in response to this agent (Newton et al., 1994
). Second, it seems that immunization with drug-treated and Lp-loaded DCs causes a decrease in Th1 activity with no concomitant increase in Th2 activity, at least as measured by IL-4-producing splenocytes. Finally, the studies suggest that Lp immunization under these conditions results in primarily a Th1 response and that the suppression of this response by THC is mediated by mechanisms independent of IL-4 production.
The previous studies suggested that drug treatment suppressed the Th1-polarizing function of DCs, and we wanted to explore this further using an in vitro paradigm. Because IL-12 is potent in directing Th1 cell differentiation (Manetti et al., 1993
) and because we had shown that THC suppressed IL-12p40 in Lp-infected DC cultures (Lu et al., 2006
), we evaluated the Th1-promoting potential (as measured by IFN-
production) of both Lp-loaded DCs and drug-treated DCs in coculture with Lp-primed CD4+ T cells and the role of IL-12p40 in the response. The data showed that coculturing Lp-loaded DCs with Lp-primed T cells led to enhanced IL-12p40 and IFN-
production by the cultures compared with coculture with unprimed T cells and that THC treatment of the DCs attenuated cytokine production (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the addition of IL-12p40 to the THC-treated cultures restored the robust production of both IL-12p40 and IFN-
, suggesting that suppression of the p40 protein plays a major role in inhibiting Th1 polarization. However, suppression of p40 protein is not the only factor involved. For example, the addition of IL-12p40 to cultures of purified Lp-primed CD4 T cells in the absence of DCs resulted in very little IFN-
production (<300 pg/ml) (data not shown), supporting previous findings that full Th1 polarization requires both stimulation by cytokines, such as IL-12, and costimulation by contact with DCs (Kapsenberg, 2003
). We looked at cytokines other than IL-12p40, such as IL-12p70 and IL-23, that have been shown to polarize toward Th1 (Hunter, 2005
); however, these cytokines were probably not involved because they could not be detected in the supernatants (data not shown). In addition, IL-10 has been shown to suppress Th1 polarization under various conditions (Yao et al., 2005
); however, again it was not detected in the supernatants and thus was probably not involved in the drug effect. Together, these results show that IL-12p40 is a major Th1-polarizing protein, as reported by others (Holscher et al., 2001
; Cooper et al., 2002
; Brombacher et al., 2003
), and that its suppression by THC is a key factor in the inhibition of Th1 cell development.
Besides IL-12 production, DCs also promote the maturation of Th1 cells by the production of helper cell-surface proteins, such as MHC class II and costimulatory molecules (Kapsenberg, 2003
). To further explore the basis of THC-suppressing DC function, we examined THC effects on the expression of these surface markers. The results showed that THC treatment markedly reduced the expression of MHC class II and the costimulatory molecules CD86 and CD40 (Fig. 5). The mechanism for this is unclear at this time; however, signaling through cannabinoid receptors could be involved because ligation of similar receptors (i.e., Gi-linked) has been shown to modulate DC maturation from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Coutant et al., 2002
) and we have reported that cannabinoid receptors are partly involved in the THC-induced suppression of IL-12p40 production by DCs (Lu et al., 2006
). We are currently studying the role of these receptors in the drug effect on surface marker development. In addition to the above markers, Notch receptors and ligands have been reported to be critical for CD4 T-cell differentiation. Bone marrow-derived DCs, under different conditions, can be induced to express either of the two distinct classes of Notch ligands, Jagged1 (Th2 polarizing) or Delta4 (Th1 polarizing) (Amsen et al., 2004
). Our data showed that both Notch ligand mRNAs, Jagged1 and Delta4, were induced in DCs after Lp infection; however, THC treatment significantly suppressed the expression of Delta4 but had little effect on Jagged1 (Fig. 6). These results, coupled with the above findings that the THC-treated DCs are deficient in Th1-polarizing splenocytes, support previous findings that the Delta ligands induce Th1 cells (Amsen et al., 2004
). The mechanism of this drug effect could involve cannabinoid receptors, because G protein-coupled receptors activated through Gs have been shown to increase Jagged ligand expression and polarize to Th2 (Amsen et al., 2004
); cannabinoid receptors are coupled to Gi, and it is possible that these types of receptors might suppress Th1 by inhibiting Delta ligands as seen in our study along with inhibiting IL-12 as shown by others (la Sala et al., 2005
).
To initiate an immune response against Lp infection, DCs must take up and process the intact bacteria and then transition through cellular maturation, cytokine production, and pathogen-related antigen presentation. In contrast to macrophages, wherein intracellular growth of Lp was observed (Salins et al., 2001
), we showed in the current report that DCs restricted Lp growth with moderate killing over time (Fig. 7). THC-treated DCs showed a similar growth pattern and time course, suggesting that Lp handling was the same in both groups. THC has been reported to induce apoptosis in mouse DCs (Do et al., 2004
), and Lp infection has been shown to be apoptotic in macrophages and other cells (Abu-Zant et al., 2005
; Fischer et al., 2006
). Our results with annexin V staining (Fig. 8) showed that Lp infection induces limited apoptotic activity in DCs as observed in other cell types (Abu-Zant et al., 2005
; Fischer et al., 2006
); however, we also showed that THC did not increase apoptosis over infection only and that, in addition, both treatments had no effect on actual cell death, as measured by propidium iodide staining (Fig. 8). Our results with THC and apoptosis seem to differ from previous results, wherein 10 µM THC was shown to induce annexin V positivity in 80% of the cells (Do et al., 2004
). However, these studies were done using serum-free medium, whereas ours were done with medium containing fetal calf serum, which is known to reduce the potency of the added cannabinoids (Klein et al., 1985
). Because THC at concentrations of 15 to 30 µM induced apoptosis in splenocytes and macrophages in medium containing fetal calf serum (Zhu et al., 1998
), we expect that apoptosis would have been induced in the current studies at these high drug concentrations. It is concluded that THC treatment under the current conditions is not suppressing DC function by either altering the intracellular life cycle of Lp or by causing enhanced apoptosis and death of the cells.
In conclusion, our results show that a major cellular target of THC-induced immune suppression of Th1 immunity is the dendritic cell and that the drug attenuates polarizing function by suppressing IL-12p40 production and the expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules. Although THC might compromise the host's ability to fight infection, it also might be of use in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as celiac disease and Crohn's disease (Hart et al., 2005
; Rimoldi et al., 2005
), rheumatoid arthritis (Thomas and Lipsky, 1996
; Walker et al., 2006
), and systemic lupus (Hardin, 2005
), and therefore might be in the class of anti-inflammatory drugs recognized to interfere with earlier stages of immunity by suppressing DC activation (Hackstein and Thomson, 2004
).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: Th1, type 1 T-helper cell; Th2, type 2-T helper cell; THC,
-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; DCs, dendritic cells; Lp, Legionella pneumophila; LpDC, Lp-loaded DC; IFN-
, interferon-
; IL, interleukin; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; CFU, colony-forming unit; mAb, monoclonal antibody; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; i.v., intravenous; bp, base pair; PE, phycoerythrin.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Thomas W. Klein, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, MDC 10 University of South Florida College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33612. E-mail: tklein{at}hsc.usf.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abu-Zant A, Santic M, Molmeret M, Jones S, Helbig J, and Abu Kwaik Y (2005) Incomplete activation of macrophage apoptosis during intracellular replication of Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun 73: 5339-5349.
Amsen D, Blander JM, Lee GR, Tanigaki K, Honjo T, and Flavell RA (2004) Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells. Cell 117: 515-526.[CrossRef][Medline]
Biedermann T, Zimmermann S, Himmelrich H, Gumy A, Egeter O, Sakrauski AK, Seegmuller I, Voigt H, Launois P, Levine AD, et al. (2001) IL-4 instructs TH1 responses and resistance to Leishmania major in susceptible BALB/c mice. Nat Immunol 2: 1054-1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brombacher F, Kastelein RA, and Alber G (2003) Novel IL-12 family members shed light on the orchestration of Th1 responses. Trends Immunol 24: 207-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
Celluzzi CM and Falo LD Jr (1998) Physical interaction between dendritic cells and tumor cells results in an immunogen that induces protective and therapeutic tumor rejection. J Immunol 160: 3081-3085.
Cooper AM, Kipnis A, Turner J, Magram J, Ferrante J, and Orme IM (2002) Mice lacking bioactive IL-12 can generate protective, antigen-specific cellular responses to mycobacterial infection only if the IL-12 p40 subunit is present. J Immunol 168: 1322-1327.
Coutant F, Perrin-Cocon L, Agaugue S, Delair T, Andre P, and Lotteau V (2002) Mature dendritic cell generation promoted by lysophosphatidylcholine. J Immunol 169: 1688-1695.
Do Y, McKallip RJ, Nagarkatti M, and Nagarkatti PS (2004) Activation through cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 on dendritic cells triggers NF-kappaB-dependent apoptosis: novel role for endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids in immunoregulation. J Immunol 173: 2373-2382.
Fischer SF, Vier J, Muller-Thomas C, and Hacker G (2006) Induction of apoptosis by Legionella pneumophila in mammalian cells requires the mitochondrial pathway for caspase activation. Microbes Infect 8: 662-669.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hackstein H and Thomson AW (2004) Dendritic cells: emerging pharmacological targets of immunosuppressive drugs. Nat Rev Immunol 4: 24-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hardin JA (2005) Dendritic cells: potential triggers of autoimmunity and targets for therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 64 (Suppl 4): iv86-iv90.
Hart AL, Al-Hassi HO, Rigby RJ, Bell SJ, Emmanuel AV, Knight SC, Kamm MA, and Stagg AJ (2005) Characteristics of intestinal dendritic cells in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 129: 50-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holscher C, Atkinson RA, Arendse B, Brown N, Myburgh E, Alber G, and Brombacher F (2001) A protective and agonistic function of IL-12p40 in mycobacterial infection. J Immunol 167: 6957-6966.
Hunter CA (2005) New IL-12-family members: IL-23 and IL-27, cytokines with divergent functions. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 521-531.[CrossRef][Medline]
Iwasaki A and Medzhitov R (2004) Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 5: 987-995.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kapsenberg ML (2003) Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol 3: 984-993.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klein TW (2005) Cannabinoid-based drugs as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 400-411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klein TW and Cabral GA (2006) Cannabinoid-induced immune suppression and modulation of antigen-presenting cells. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 1: 50-64.[CrossRef]
Klein TW, Newton CA, Nakachi N, and Friedman H (2000) Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment suppresses immunity and early IFN-gamma, IL-12, and IL-12 receptor beta 2 responses to Legionella pneumophila infection. J Immunol 164: 6461-6466.
Klein TW, Newton CA, Widen R, and Friedman H (1985) The effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on T lymphocyte and B lymphocyte mitogen responses. J Immunopharmacol 7: 451-466.[Medline]
la Sala A, Gadina M, and Kelsall BL (2005) Gi-protein-dependent inhibition of IL-12 production is mediated by activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein 3 kinase B/Akt pathway and JNK. J Immunol 175: 2994-2999.
Lu T, Newton C, Perkins I, Friedman H, and Klein TW (2006) Role of cannabinoid receptors in Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol suppression of IL-12p40 in mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells infected with Legionella pneumophila. Eur J Pharmacol 532: 170-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ludewig B, Ehl S, Karrer U, Odermatt B, Hengartner H, and Zinkernagel RM (1998) Dendritic cells efficiently induce protective antiviral immunity. J Virol 72: 3812-3818.
Manetti R, Parronchi P, Giudizi MG, Piccinni MP, Maggi E, Trinchieri G, and Romagnani S (1993) Natural killer cell stimulatory factor (interleukin 12 [IL-12]) induces T helper type 1 (Th1)-specific immune responses and inhibits the development of IL-4-producing Th cells. J Exp Med 177: 1199-1204.
Moll H and Berberich C (2001) Dendritic cells as vectors for vaccination against infectious diseases. Int J Med Microbiol 291: 323-329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newton CA, Klein TW, and Friedman H (1994) Secondary immunity to Legionella pneumophila and Th1 activity are suppressed by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol injection. Infect Immun 62: 4015-4020.
Pulendran B (2004) Modulating TH1/TH2 responses with microbes, dendritic cells, and pathogen recognition receptors. Immunol Res 29: 187-196.[CrossRef][Medline]
Radtke F, Wilson A, Mancini SJ, and MacDonald HR (2004) Notch regulation of lymphocyte development and function. Nat Immunol 5: 247-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, Avogadri F, Sonzogni A, Sampietro GM, Nespoli A, Viale G, Allavena P, and Rescigno M (2005) Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 6: 507-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
Salins S, Newton C, Widen R, Klein TW, and Friedman H (2001) Differential induction of gamma interferon in Legionella pneumophila-infected macrophages from BALB/c and A/J mice. Infect Immun 69: 3605-3610.
Su H, Messer R, Whitmire W, Fischer E, Portis JC, and Caldwell HD (1998) Vaccination against chlamydial genital tract infection after immunization with dendritic cells pulsed ex vivo with nonviable Chlamydiae. J Exp Med 188: 809-818.
Swain SL, Weinberg AD, English M, and Huston G (1990) IL-4 directs the development of Th2-like helper effectors. J Immunol 145: 3796-3806.[Abstract]
Thomas R and Lipsky PE (1996) Presentation of self peptides by dendritic cells: possible implications for the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 39: 183-190.[Medline]
von Stebut E, Belkaid Y, Nguyen BV, Cushing M, Sacks DL, and Udey MC (2000) Leishmania major-infected murine langerhans cell-like dendritic cells from susceptible mice release IL-12 after infection and vaccinate against experimental cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Eur J Immunol 30: 3498-3506.[CrossRef][Medline]
Walker JG, Ahern MJ, Coleman M, Weedon H, Papangelis V, Beroukas D, Roberts-Thomson PJ, and Smith MD (2006) Expression of Jak3, STAT1, STAT4, and STAT6 in inflammatory arthritis: unique Jak3 and STAT4 expression in dendritic cells in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 65: 149-156.
Yao Y, Li W, Kaplan MH, and Chang CH (2005) Interleukin (IL)-4 inhibits IL-10 to promote IL-12 production by dendritic cells. J Exp Med 201: 1899-1903.
Zhu W, Friedman H, and Klein TW (1998) Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol induces apoptosis in macrophages and lymphocytes: involvement of Bcl-2 and caspase-1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 1103-1109.
Zitvogel L, Mayordomo JI, Tjandrawan T, DeLeo AB, Clarke MR, Lotze MT, and Storkus WJ (1996) Therapy of murine tumors with tumor peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulation, and T helper cell 1-associated cytokines. J Exp Med 183: 87-97.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Lu, B. L. F. Kaplan, T. Ngaotepprutaram, and N. E. Kaminski Suppression of T cell costimulator ICOS by {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2009; 85(2): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Buchweitz, P. W. F. Karmaus, J. R. Harkema, K. J. Williams, and N. E. Kaminski Modulation of Airway Responses to Influenza A/PR/8/34 by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in C57BL/6 Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2007; 323(2): 675 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xu, C. L. Cheng, M. Chen, A. Manivannan, L. Cabay, R. G. Pertwee, A. Coutts, and J. V. Forrester Anti-inflammatory property of the cannabinoid receptor-2-selective agonist JWH-133 in a rodent model of autoimmune uveoretinitis J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 532 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||