|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Peptide
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana (T.U., T.G.); Section on Drug Design and Development, Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland (T.U., Q.Y., H.W.H., N.H.G.); Lead Discovery, Message Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania (D.D., T.G.); Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (D.C., D.K.L.); School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (A.B.); and Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina (K.S.)
Received for publication
February 21, 2006
Accepted
May 9, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
peptide (A
) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Based on these and earlier associative studies, A
represents a promising target for development of therapeutics focused on AD disease progression. Interestingly, a cholinesterase inhibitor currently in clinical trials, phenserine, has been shown to inhibit production of both amyloid precursor protein (APP) and A
. We have shown that this inhibition occurs at the post-transcriptional level with a specific blocking of the synthesis of APP relative to total protein synthesis (Shaw et al., 2001
production, without possessing potent acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to identify analogs capable of suppressing APP production following treatment of human neuroblastoma cells with 20 µM of compound. Eight analogs were capable of dose dependently reducing APP and A
production without causing cell toxicity in further studies. Several of these analogs had little to no AChE activities. Translation of APP and A
actions to mice was demonstrated with one agent. They thus represent interesting lead molecules for assessment in animal models, to define their tolerance and utility as potential AD therapeutics.
peptide (A
), a key component of extracellular plaques, is growing. For example, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines directed against A
have led to the reduction of plaques in transgenic mice (Chauhan and Siegel, 2003
was halted, pathological data from patients in the trial support the notion that A
clearance has a broader role in disease progression, including influencing tau phosphorylation (Nicoll et al., 2003
on tau phosphorylation has also been supported by immunization of triple-transgenic mice containing the A
, tau, and presenelin 1 genes. In these mice, a decline in long-term potentiation (LTP) occurred before the appearance of the plaques or tangles and correlated with the accumulation of intraneuronal A
(for review, see LaFerla and Oddo, 2005
in learning and memory, suggest a causative role of A
in AD pathophysiology, and thus support it as a target for AD drug development and treatment.
An alternative approach to lowering A
by increasing its clearance is to lower its initial formation. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors have been shown to effect amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing in cell culture, resulting in lower levels of A
, and thus they may also have actions on disease course (Pakaski and Kasa, 2003
; Racchi et al., 2004
). There are currently five drugs approved for the treatment of AD, four of which, Tacrine (Cognex), donepezil (Aricept), rivastigmine (Exelon), and galantamine (Reminyl), are AChE inhibitors, to which the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine (Namenda) has been recently added. AChE inhibitors are considered to be symptomatic drugs that, by inhibiting the activity of AChE, elevate acetylcholine levels in brain by reducing its rate of hydrolysis. This important neurotransmitter stimulates the cholinergic system and thereby augments learning and memory. Whether actions on APP and A
translate from cell culture to in vivo and AD remains unknown.
Phenserine, a physostigmine analog, is an experimental AChE inhibitor (Greig et al., 1995
, 2005a
) that has reached clinical trails for AD. Besides its anticholinesterase action, it inhibits the increase in APP in rats following a nucleus basalis lesion (Haroutunian et al., 1997
), a model that mimics the forebrain cholinergic loss of AD. Later studies (Shaw et al., 2001
) showed that phenserine reduces APP production in cultured neuronal cell lines post-transcriptionally at the level of the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) of APP mRNA, leading to lower A
levels. This 5'-UTR had previously been demonstrated to contain a translational enhancer (Rogers et al., 1999
; Brun et al., 2003
) that includes both an iron-responsive element as well as an interleukin response element (Rogers et al., 2002a
). Using the 5'-UTR in a reporter gene assay, a screen of Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs resulted in 16 molecules capable of reducing the expression of the reporter gene and lowering APP levels (Rogers et al., 2002b
; Morse et al., 2004
), with phenserine likewise demonstrating activity in this assay (Morse et al., 2004
). Whereas phenserine did induce a transient increase in ERK levels and phosphorylated ERK, its action in lowering APP was not dependent of either because selective inhibitors of each failed to prevent the ability of phenserine to reduce APP levels (Shaw et al., 2001
). Furthermore, this action was noncholinergically mediated because the AChE-inert chiral isomer of this agent, (+)-phenserine, similarly lowered APP (Shaw et al., 2001
; Greig et al., 2005a
).
The physiological function(s) of the various APP forms and proteolytic products remains a focus of research, and some possess likely roles in tasks as diverse as synaptic plasticity and apoptosis (Morgan et al., 2004
; Reinhard et al., 2005
; Sambamurti et al., 2006
). Nevertheless, the strategy of reducing A
via its precursor with phenserine has not been associated with adverse effects in chronically dosed rodents and dogs in preclinical studies (Greig et al., 2005a
). Although this dual-action molecule represents an interesting alternative to currently approved anticholinesterases, AChE inhibitors are by nature dose-limiting, which may prevent achievement of the necessary concentration for optimally inhibiting A
production in humans. Accordingly, we investigated whether analogs of phenserine that lacked potent AChE inhibitory activity could be identified that would still allow reduction of A
levels. We have identified a number of such analogs, including the (+)-enantiomer of phenserine, posiphen, described previously (Shaw et al., 2001
).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cell Culture. Human neuroblastoma cell lines SH-SY-5Y and SK-N-SH were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), culture medium was from Mediatech (Herndon, VA), and FCS was from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT).
Initial Compound Screen. For initial screening, SH-SY-5Y cells were cultured in 96-well plates at 1 x 105 cells/ml in 100 µl of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/0.5% heat inactivated FCS containing either duplicate dilutions of analogs (final concentration of 20 µM in 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide) or vehicle controls. The cells were incubated for 16 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. A 75-µl sample of supernatant per well was collected in tubes containing radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer with 10x protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) for soluble APP and LDH measurements. Cellular viability was additionally assessed by the addition of MTS reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) to the remaining cells.
Levels of APP produced by cells, in the presence and absence of analogs, were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). APP 44-100 antibody (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) was diluted to 2 µg/ml and absorbed to a Maxisorp plate overnight at 4°C. After washing with ELISA buffer, 80 µl of media and 10 µl of supernatant were added to the wells and incubated overnight at 4°C. 6E10-biotin antibody (Signet Laboratories, Dedham, MA) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The plates were washed three times, and detection antibody was added for 30 min. Following three additional washes, TMB substrate (Moss, Inc. Pasadena, MD) was added and developed for approximately 20 min. The reaction was stopped with 0.18 M sulfuric acid, and the plate was read at 450 nm on a Wallac Victor2 plate reader. The background values from the noncultured media control were subtracted from the sample values and secreted APP levels were expressed as percentage of vehicle control. LDH activity was analyzed using the CytoTox 96 NonRadioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega). MTS activity was determined using the CellTiter 96 AQueous NonRadioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega).
Western Analysis of APP Levels. SK-N-SH cells were then analyzed for the ability of eight analogs identified in the initial screen to inhibit APP protein production. Cells were plated into 24-well plates at a density of 2 x 105 cells/well in 500 µl of minimum essential medium, Eagle's/10% heat-inactivated FCS containing 50 ng/ml recombinant human
-nerve growth factor (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). They were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 days; thereafter, FCS was reduced to 0.5%, and 24 h later, analogs (A-H) were added in similar medium, in triplicate alongside vehicle controls. Supernatant was removed from the cells after 24-h treatment, protein levels were determined, and 15 µg of sample was mixed with Laemmli buffer, boiled for 5 min, and loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel (Novex, San Diego, CA). The proteins were separated at 200 V for 45 min and transferred to nitrocellulose. Following blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk, the nitrocellulose was probed for 2 h with 2.5 µg/ml 22C11 anti-APP antibody (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). After washing twice, anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added for 30 min, the filter was washed three times, and sample was detected by chemiluminescence. Cell viability was assessed by LDH measurement and MTS activity versus controls, as described above.
A
ELISA. Concentrations of secreted A
(1-40) produced by cells in the presence and absence of analogs were analyzed in supernatant samples by ELISA colorimetric kit, as per the manufacturer's instructions (BioSource International). Background values from the noncultured media control were subtracted from the sample values, and secreted A
levels were expressed as percentage of vehicle control.
RNA Quantification. To assess whether reductions in APP protein levels were mediated at the transcriptional levels, SH-SY-5Y cells were incubated, as described above, for 16 h in increasing concentrations of analogs A to H. The maximal concentration of each, at which no adverse actions were observed, as assessed by LDH measurement and MTS activity versus controls, was then chosen for analysis of RNA levels. RNA was isolated, and equal volumes were separated through a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gradient and probed for actin and APP using random primed 32P probes. Signals of APP and actin mRNAs were quantified by phosphorimaging analysis (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA).
Protein Synthesis. To determine whether the changes in abundance of APP protein resulted from activity at the translational level, SH-SY-5Y cells were incubated in methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM for 1 h following treatment (16 h) with and without analogs A to H (at maximal concentrations) and then pulsed with 35S-labeled amino acids for 10 min in the presence of compound. The medium was carefully removed, and the cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, 2 mM EGTA, 50 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol) containing protease inhibitors (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin, leupeptin, and soybean trypsin inhibitor) and frozen at -80°C until use. APP protein was immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C using a polyclonal antibody ab2072 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and protein A/G resin. The immunoprecipitated APP were eluted from the protein A/G resin with 30 µl of sample buffer containing 10% (v/v)
-mercaptoethanol. The immunoprecipitated protein was electrophoresed on a 10% Tris-glycine gel, after which the gels were fixed and dried at 80°C for 60 min. The dried gels were exposed to Phosphor Screen (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) overnight, and the APP signals were quantitated on a PhosphorImager. The levels of newly synthesized APP were normalized by TCA-precipitable counts.
Rodent Studies. Twenty-seven adult male C57Blk mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY), mean weight 28 g, were administered either analog E (2.5 or 7.5 mg/kg i.p. once daily; n = 8 and 9, respectively) or vehicle (n = 10) for 21 consecutive days. Animals were killed within 90 to 120 min of the final dose, the brain was removed, and right cerebral hemisphere was frozen to -80°C. Thereafter, hemispheres were homogenized, and cell lysates containing whole protein were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions for enzymatic assay kits (R&D Systems). In brief, brain samples were homogenized in 800 µl of low-salt 1x extraction buffer (kit from R&D Systems) and incubated on ice for 10 min. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 10,000g for 15 min at 4°C. The protein concentration in each sample was estimated according to biuret-derived assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL), and levels of APP and A
(1-40) were measured by Western immunoblotting and specific sandwich ELISA, respectively. Experiments in mice complied with National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
|
Although the ELISA assay allowed for rapid screening of the 144 phenserine analogs, to validate these results and ensure selectivity of the response, intracellular and extracellular APP levels were determined by Western analysis of SK-N-SH cells, at six concentrations (0.01-10 µM) for each of the eight described analogs, and they are shown in Fig. 2. The maximal chosen concentration (10 µM) had no effect on cell viability of SK-N-SH cells. In accord with the initial ELISA-based screening assay, all analogs lowered extracellular APP levels. This occurred dose-dependently, with a maximal reduction of between 50 and 60% of control levels. Most analogs (B, C, E, G, and H) decreased both the extra- and intracellular APP levels (p < 0.05 versus control; Dunnett's t test). A few analogs (A, D, and F) decreased extracellular APP (p < 0.05 versus control; Dunnett's t test) without significant reductions of intracellular APP levels (p > 0.05 versus control; Dunnett's t test). Of particular interest, analogs A, B, C, E, and H induced reductions in extracellular APP levels at submicromolar concentrations (p < 0.05 versus control at
1 µM; Dunnett's t test).
|
|
|
The compounds were additionally evaluated for their ability to inhibit A
secretion in cultured media by treating cells at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 µM for 24 h. As shown in Fig. 2, which depicts the action of 0.3 to 10 µM dose versus controls, several analogs (A, B, D, E, and H) significantly lowered extracellular A
levels at 10 µM (p < 0.05 versus controls; Dunnett's t test). E and H were the most potent compounds, not only inhibiting A
accumulation in the media by up to 50% at 10 µM but also achieving a significant reduction at 1.0 µM (p < 0.05 versus controls; Dunnett's t test). In contrast, analogs A, C, and F, although significantly lowering secreted APP levels by up to 60%, only mildly lowered A
levels by up to 20%.
Daily administration of analog E to mice, as a representative of the eight APP-lowering agents, was well tolerated. Neither dose (2.5 and 7.5 mg/kg i.p. once daily x 21 days) affected body weight nor induced any discernible aberrant or behavioral actions, compared with controls (data not shown). However, both doses significantly lowered brain APP (36 and 38%) and A
levels by 38 and 30%, respectively, versus controls (p < 0.05; Dunnett's t test versus control) (Fig. 5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production at the posttranscriptional level by inhibiting the synthesis of the APP protein (Shaw et al., 2001
The potential regulation of APP at the level of translation was first inferred from studies done by Wallace et al. (1995
). They demonstrated that following a nucleus basalis lesion, there is a 2-fold increase in APP protein and the A
peptide in the cortex of rats. Since an increase in protein stabilization would result in a decrease in proteolytic peptides, the increase in APP protein and A
peptide must result from events occurring before protein synthesis. In addition, they noted that this increase could be detected within 1 h following the lesion. This eliminates transcriptional induction, which has been estimated to require 4 h for the APP gene. Thus, the increase in APP protein is likely due to increased translational efficiency of the mRNA. Additional studies demonstrated that this increase in APP could be eliminated by treatment of rats with phenserine (Haroutunian et al., 1997
), being the first to raise the possibility that phenserine may be acting at the translational level to reduce APP synthesis.
The ability of phenserine to block translation was demonstrated by Greig and colleagues (Shaw et al., 2001
). Although one report (Mbongolo Mbella et al., 2000
) identified an element in the 3'-UTR of APP involved in regulating its translation, most of the studies support a role for the 5'-UTR. Rogers first identified a 90-nucleotide translational enhancer in the 5'-UTR (Rogers et al., 1999
) and later found that this region contained an iron-responsive element (Rogers et al., 2002a
). Mallet and colleagues (Brun et al., 2003
) also demonstrated the translational enhancer activity of the APP 5'-UTR in neuronal cells when placed in front of a reporter gene. Using this UTR in a reporter gene assay and screening a panel of Food and Drug Administration-approved compounds, a number of inhibitors of APP translation were identified (Rogers et al., 2002b
; Morse et al., 2004
). Although many of these hits likely have restricted brain access consequent to their limited blood-brain barrier permeability or may exhibit toxicity with chronic use, there were four compounds that inhibit APP for which their primary mechanism of action is neuronal. Of these, phenserine seemed to be the most efficacious.
Whereas phenserine has also been shown to be capable of lowering A
levels in vivo, the potent AChE inhibitory activity of the compound (IC50 = 22 nM) raises concern whether dosages needed to optimally lower APP and A
clinically might be limited by cholinergically mediated side effects (e.g., nausea). In neuronal cultures, significant APP activity is achieved at >1 µM (Shaw et al., 2001
). Thus, the focus of the present study was to identify analogs of phenserine that still inhibit APP synthesis but lack AChE potency. In contrast, selective BChE inhibition has not been associated with classic cholinergic overdrive (Greig et al., 2005b
), and lack of this enzyme activity occurs naturally in humans, consequent to mutation, without adverse effects.
Following the screening of a number of phenserine analogs in human SH-SY-5Y neuroblastoma cells, eight lipophilic analogs were identified that varyingly inhibit intracellular and extracellular APP levels and the A
peptide in culture media of human SK-N-SH cells at concentrations that were largely devoid of AChE activity. Whereas all the identified agents lowered secreted levels of APP in a concentration-dependent manner in cell culture, this did not always translate into reductions in cellular APP and secreted A
, suggesting a complex regulation. A change in secreted APP absent a corresponding change in intracellular APP may result from changes in the processing or secretion of APP, which will be investigated in future studies. However, most of the compounds did decrease both intracellular and extracellular APP levels with a corresponding decrease in secreted A
. This was achieved without altering APP mRNA levels and seems to translate in vivo, as assessed by lowered brain APP and A
in mice administered analog E. One possible mechanism by which protein levels are reduced without a change in RNA is through translational regulation of protein synthesis. The inhibition of APP protein synthesis is supported by the data showing a reduction in newly synthesized APP protein without changes in total protein synthesis or cell viability, following analog treatment.
Protein synthesis is a complex process involving ribosome assembly, initiation, and elongation. Although the efficiency of translation of mRNA can be regulated at any of these steps, initiation, which includes the level and activity of initiation factors, is predominantly the major regulatory event. The efficiency of translation of individual mRNAs can vary by a 100-fold and are regulated in response to nutritional, hormonal, and developmental signals (Gingras et al., 1999
; Rhoads, 1999
).
At least eight proteins have been identified as targets for regulatory pathways affecting protein synthesis through cap-dependent translation (Rhoads, 1999
). The eIF4E binding protein (4E-BP) has generated a great deal of interest in drug discovery, because it is regulated via phosphorylation. Unphosphorylated 4E-BP is bound to eIF4E, preventing it from initiating protein synthesis. Upon phosphorylation of 4E-BP, which is dependent on mammalian target of rapamycin (Jacinto, 2003
), eIF4E is released and can bind to eIF4G to initiate protein synthesis (Haghighat et al., 1995
). Other enzymes important in this signal transduction process include phosphoinositide-3 kinase, phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase, protein kinase B, and Akt (Huang and Houghton, 2003
). Rapamycin, the compound that inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin activity, and a number of its analogs are in preclinical and clinical development (Dancey, 2002
), providing validation for the approach of targeting protein synthesis therapeutically. Rapamycin has also been shown to regulate LTP in hippocampal slices (Tang et al., 2002
).
Synaptic plasticity is well understood to play a major role in learning and memory, which is linked to LTP, a measurement of calcium influx and thus neuronal activity. In addition, synaptic dysfunction has been shown to be a better predictor of memory and cognitive decline than either AD plaques or tangles (DeKosky, 1990
; Dickson et al., 1995
; Sze et al., 1997
). Many of the signal transduction pathways, such as ERK and 4E-BP phosphorylation, that are involved in the regulation of protein synthesis have also been demonstrated to have an important role in synaptic plasticity (Kelleher et al., 2004a
,2004b
). Although phenserine does not seem to regulate APP levels through either ERK or phosphoinositide-3 kinase (Shaw et al., 2001
), its ability or the ability of some of the recently identified analogs to alter APP protein synthesis through other pathways remains to be determined.
Protein translation clearly plays an important role in synaptic plasticity. Within the neurons there is a great deal of protein synthesis occurring in localized regions, including the synaptic sites of dendrites (Steward and Schuman, 2001
, 2003
). Furthermore, Krichevsky and Kosik (2001
) showed that many mRNAs accumulate in neuronal granuoles where they are translationally inactive but are readily moved to polysomes in response to depolarization. In contrast, depolarization decreased mRNA levels and protein synthesis of APP (Tabuchu et al., 2004
). This localized synthesis allows neurons to respond promptly to changes in synaptic signaling, leading to an increase or a decrease in the synthesis of particular proteins, which are likely to be essential early mediators of synaptic plasticity and signaling. In the present study, APP protein synthesis was rapidly affected following analog treatment, with reduced synthesis detected within 10 min. Whether these phenserine analogs are affecting the same signaling pathways as depolarization remains to be determined. The identification of molecules that selectively affect translation of APP without affecting AChE not only provides for a potential therapeutic targeting reduction of the A
peptide in AD patients with a reduced side effect profile but also should allow for a better means of studying the pathways involved in APP protein synthesis.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: AD, Alzheimer's disease; A
, amyloid
peptide; LTP, long-term potentiation; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; APP, amyloid precursor protein; UTR, untranslated region; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; BChE, butyrylcholinesterase; FCS, fetal calf serum; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LTP, long term potentiation; sAPP, secreted APP; MTS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; hnRNP, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; 4E-BP, eIF4E-binding protein.
1 These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
Address correspondence to: Dr. Tony Giordano, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71115. E-mail: agiord{at}lsuhsc.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brun S, Faucon-Biguet N, and Mallet J (2003) Optimization of transgene expression at the posttranscriptional level in neural cells: implications for gene therapy. Mol Ther 7: 782-789.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chauhan NB and Siegel GJ (2003) Intracerebroventricular passive immunization with anti-Ab antibody in Tg2576. J Neurosci Res 74: 142-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dancey J (2002) Clinical development of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 16: 1101-1114.[CrossRef][Medline]
DeKosky STSS (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27: 457-464.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dickson DW, Crystal HA, Bevona C, Honer W, Vincent I, and Davies P (1995) Correlations of synaptic and pathological markers with cognition of the elderly. Neurobiol Aging 16: 285-298.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gingras A-C, Raught B, and Sonenberg N (1999) eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 913-963.[CrossRef][Medline]
Greig NH, Pei X, Soncrant TT, Ingram DK, and Brossi A (1995) Phenserine and ring C hetero-analogues: drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Med Res Rev 15: 3-31.[Medline]
Greig NH, Sambamurti K, Yu QS, Brossi A, Bruinsma GB, and Lahiri DK (2005a) An overview of phenserine tartrate, a novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2: 281-290.[CrossRef][Medline]
Greig NH, Utsuki T, Ingram DK, Wang Y, Pepeu G, Scali C, Yu QS, Mamczarz J, Holloway HW, Giordano T, et al. (2005b) Selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibition elevates brain acetylcholine, augments learning and lowers Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide in rodent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17213-17218.
Haghighat A, Mader S, Pause A, and Sonenberg N (1995) Repression of cap-dependent translation by 4E-binding protein 1: competition with p220 for binding to eukaryotic initiation factor-4E. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 14: 5701-5709.[Medline]
Haroutunian V, Greig N, Pei XF, Utsuki T, Gluck R, Acevedo LD, Davis KL, and Wallace WC (1997) Pharmacological modulation of Alzheimer's beta-amyloid precursor protein levels in the CSF of rats with forebrain cholinergic system lesions. Mol Brain Res 46: 161-168.[Medline]
Huang S and Houghton PJ (2003) Targeting mTOR signaling for cancer therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 3: 371-377.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jacinto EHM (2003) Tor signalling in bugs, brain and brawn. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 117-126.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelleher I, Raymond J, Govindarajan A, and Tonegawa S (2004a) Translational regulatory mechanisms in persistent forms of synaptic plasticity. Neuron 44: 59-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelleher R, Govindarajan A, Jung H, Kang H, and Tonegawa S (2004b) Translational control by MAPK signaling in long-term synaptic plasticity and memory. Neuron 116: 467-479.
Krichevsky A and Kosik K (2001) Neuronal RNA granules: a link between RNA localization and stimulation-dependent translation. Neuron 32: 683-696.[CrossRef][Medline]
LaFerla FM and Oddo S (2005) Alzheimer's disease: A[beta], tau and synaptic dysfunction. Trends Mol Med 11: 170-176.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lemere CA, Beierschmitt A, Iglesias M, Spooner ET, Bloom JK, Leverone JF, Zheng JB, Seabrook TJ, Louard D, Li D, et al. (2004) Alzheimer's disease A{beta} vaccine reduces central nervous system a{beta} levels in a non-human primate, the Caribbean vervet. Am J Pathol 165: 283-297.
Lombardo JA, Stern EA, McLellan ME, Kajdasz ST, Hickey GA, Bacskai BJ, and Hyman BT (2003) Amyloid-{beta} antibody treatment leads to rapid normalization of plaque-induced neuritic alterations. J Neurosci 23: 10879-10883.
Malter JS (2001) Regulation of mRNA stability in the nervous system and beyond: mini review. J Neurosci Res 66: 311-316.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mbongolo Mbella EG, Bertrand S, Huex G, and Octave J-N (2000) A GG nucleotide sequence of the 3' untranslated region of amyloid precursor protein mRNA plays a key role in the regulation of translation and the binding of proteins. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4572-4579.
Morgan C, Colombres M, Nunez MT, and Inestrosa NC (2004) Structure and function of amyloid in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neurobiol 74: 323-349.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morse L, Payton SM, Cuny GD, and Rogers JT (2004) FDA-preapproved drugs targeted to the translational regulation and processing of the amyloid precursor protein. J Mol Neurosci 24: 129-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nicoll J, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, and Weller RO (2003) Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med 9: 448-452[CrossRef][Medline]
Pakaski M and Kasa P (2003) Role of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the metabolism of amyloid precursor protein. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disorders 2: 163-171.
Racchi M, Mazzucchelli M, Porrello E, Lanni C, and Govoni S (2004) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: novel activities of old molecules. Pharmacol Res 50: 441-451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reinhard C, Hebert SS, and De Strooper B (2005) The amyloid-beta precursor protein: integrating structure with biological function. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 24: 3996-4006.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rhoads RE (1999) Minireview: signal transduction pathways that regulate eukaryotic protein synthesis. J Biol Chem 274: 30337-30340.
Rogers JT, Leiter LM, McPhee J, Cahill CM, Zhan S-S, Potter H, and Nilsson LNG (1999) Translation of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein mRNA is upregulated by interleukin-1 through 5'-untranslated region sequences. J Biol Chem 274: 6421-6431.
Rogers JT, Randall JD, Cahill CM, Eder PS, Huang X, Gunshin H, Leiter L, McPhee J, Sarang SS, Utsuki T, et al. (2002a) An iron-responsive element type II in the 5'-untranslated region of the Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein transcript. J Biol Chem 277: 45518-45528.
Rogers JT, Randall JD, Eder PS, Huang X, Bush AI, Tanzi RE, Venti A, Payton SM, Giordano T, Nagano S, et al. (2002b) Alzheimer's disease drug discovery targeted to the APP mRNA 5' untranslated region. J Mol Neurosci 19: 77-82.[Medline]
Sambamurti K, Suram A, Venugopal C, Prakasam A, Zhou Y, Lahiri DK, and Greig NH (2006) A partial failure of membrane protein turnover may cause Alzheimer's disease: a new hypothesis. Curr Alzheimer Res 3: 81-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shaw KTY, Utsuki T, Rogers J, Yu Q-S, Sambamurti K, Brossi A, Ge Y-W, Lahiri DK, and Greig NH (2001) Phenserine regulates translation of beta-amyloid precursor protein mRNA by a putative interleukin-1 responsive element, a target for drug development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 7605-7610.
Steward O and Schuman EM (2001) Protein synthesis at synaptic sites on dendrites. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 299-325.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steward O and Schuman EM (2003) Compartmentalized synthesis and degradation of proteins in neurons. Neuron 40: 347-359.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sze CITJ, Kawas C, Mouton P, Price DL, and Martin LJ (1997) Loss of the presynaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin in hippocampus correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 56: 933-944.[Medline]
Tabuchu A, Ishii A, Fukuchi M, Kobayashi S, Suzuki T, and Tsuda M (2004) Activity-dependent increase in B-amyloid precursor protein mRNA expression in neurons. Neuroreport 15: 1329-1333.[Medline]
Tang SJ, Reis G, Kang H, Gingras A-C, Sonenberg N, and Schuman EM (2002) A rapamycin-sensitive signaling pathway contributes to long-term synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 467-472.
Wallace W, Lieberburg I, Schenk D, Vigo-Pelfrey C, Davis K, and Haroutunian V (1995) Chronic elevation of secreted amyloid precursor protein in subcortically lesioned rats and its exacerbation in aged rats. J Neurosci 15: 4896-4905.[Abstract]
Younkin S (2001) Amyloid beta vaccination: reduced plaques and improved cognition. Nat Med 7: 18-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Marutle, M. Ohmitsu, M. Nilbratt, N. H. Greig, A. Nordberg, and K. Sugaya Modulation of human neural stem cell differentiation in Alzheimer (APP23) transgenic mice by phenserine PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12506 - 12511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Lahiri, D. Chen, B. Maloney, H. W. Holloway, Q.-s. Yu, T. Utsuki, T. Giordano, K. Sambamurti, and N. H. Greig The Experimental Alzheimer's Disease Drug Posiphen [(+)-Phenserine] Lowers Amyloid-beta Peptide Levels in Cell Culture and Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 386 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||