![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Received December 20, 2005; accepted February 27, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The technique of intracranial drug microinjection, despite its obvious utility, is limited by the fact that local drug concentrations are usually unknown and may not be comparable with those obtained after systemic administration. Using an alternate approach, we recently evaluated the respective roles of accumbens core and shell in amphetamine-induced locomotion and conditioned place preference (CPP) by combining a systemic amphetamine challenge with prior 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions of either structure (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). In this study, DAergic depletion in core and medial shell reduced amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation and CPP, respectively.
In the present study, we sought to extend these findings to cocaine. Intra-NAcc infusion of cocaine produces both locomotor stimulation and rewarding effects (Ikemoto, 2002
, 2003
; Rodd-Henricks et al., 2002
; Ikemoto and Witkin, 2003
). However, the interpretation of such findings is complicated by possible sympathomimetic and anesthetic actions within the target tissue (Ikemoto, 2003
; Ikemoto and Witkin, 2003
). Even after systemic injection, the precise route of administration can be critical. In particular, cocaine is reported to produce dopamine (DA)-dependent or DA-independent rewarding effects, depending on whether it is delivered i.v. or i.p. (Spyraki et al., 1987
). In the present study, these two systemic routes of administration were compared.
The less-studied olfactory tubercle (OT) may also play a role in psychomotor stimulant-mediated locomotor activation and reward. This is suggested by studies using intracranial administration in rats. Thus, direct intra-OT infusions of DA agonists including amphetamine and cocaine produced marked and prompt locomotor activation (Pijnenburg et al., 1976
; Cools, 1986
; Ikemoto, 2002
), and both these drugs were avidly self-administered at OT sites (Ikemoto, 2003
; Ikemoto et al., 2005
). Interestingly, intra-OT drug infusions elicited stronger locomotor and reinforcing effects than intra-NAcc infusions (Cools, 1986
; Ikemoto, 2003
; Ikemoto et al., 2005
). Despite these positive findings, we previously tested the impact of profound 6-OHDA lesions of OT on the locomotor stimulant and rewarding (CPP) effects of systemic amphetamine challenge and concluded that DAergic transmission in the OT does not contribute significantly to either behavioral effect (Clarke et al., 1988
, 1990
). Hence, at present, it is an open question whether the OT contributes significantly to the locomotor stimulant and rewarding effects of any systemically administered psychostimulant.
The overall goal of the present study was, therefore, to localize the ventral striatal actions of systemically administered cocaine. The first experiment investigated whether the locomotor stimulant effects of i.v. and i.p. cocaine are diminished by DA denervation in the accumbens core or medial shell. The next two experiments determined whether the stimulant and rewarding effects of cocaine could be dissociated by selective 6-OHDA lesions of either structure, as previously seen with amphetamine (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). The final experiment tested for OT involvement in cocaine reward and locomotor activation, again after systemic drug challenge.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subjects. Subjects were male Long-Evans rats (Charles River, St. Constant, QC, Canada) weighing 250 to 325 g at the time of surgery. Rats were housed individually (experiment 1) or in groups of three (experiments 24) in clear Plexiglas cages in a temperature- and humidity-controlled animal colony, lit from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Food and water were available ad libitum except during behavioral testing. All experiments were approved by the McGill Faculty of Medicine Animal Care Committee in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines.
Stereotaxic Infusion of 6-OHDA. Surgery was performed 7 to 10 days before the start of behavioral testing. Rats were anesthetized with ketamine HCl (90 mg/kg i.p.) and xylazine HCl (16 mg/kg i.p.) before placement in a stereotaxic apparatus (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA) with the incisor bar set at 3.9 mm. Depending on the experiment (see Table 1), rats received bilateral infusions of either 6-OHDA or vehicle into either NAcc core, medial shell, or anteromedial olfactory tubercle (amOT). Infusions were made via a 30 gauge stainless steel cannula attached by polyethylene tubing to a 10-µl Hamilton syringe driven by a model 5000 Micro Injection Unit (David Kopf Instruments) (core or medial shell) or via two separate 10-µl Hamilton syringes driven by a multichannel syringe pump (amOT; MD-1001, BAS Bioanalytical Systems Inc., West Lafayette, IN). For greater accuracy, coordinates for all three target subregions were derived from the mean of two coordinate systems. Thus, anterior-posterior coordinates were +10.3 mm from interaural zero and +1.3 mm from bregma for both core and shell and +10.7 mm from interaural zero and +1.7 mm from bregma for amOT. Lateral coordinates were ±0.6 mm (shell), ±2.4 mm (core), and ±0.8 mm (amOT). Ventral coordinates for shell (three injections) were +2.0, +2.4, and +2.8 mm from interaural zero and 8.0, 7.6, and 7.2 mm from bregma. Ventral coordinates for core were +2.7 mm from interaural zero and 7.3 mm from bregma. For amOT, ventral coordinates were +1.1 and 8.9 mm, respectively, from interaural zero and bregma. All coordinates are based on the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1997
). 6-OHDA or vehicle was infused on each side in a volume of 0.1 µl (core), as three infusions of 0.06 µl (medial shell) or 0.2 µl (amOT) on each side. For core and medial shell, 6-OHDA was infused at a rate of 0.1 µl/min; for amOT, the rate of infusion was 0.1 µl/10 min. The concentration of 6-OHDA used was 80 µg/µl (core) or 48 µg/µl (shell). For amOT, a volume of 0.2 µl of either vehicle or 6-OHDA (40 µg/µl free base) was infused bilaterally over 20 min. The different doses of 6-OHDA, infusion volumes, and infusion times used at each lesion site were chosen based on pilot studies and represented the best compromise between efficacy (DA depletion) and anatomical selectivity. For all three lesion sites, the cannula remained at the final infusion site for 5 min.
Intravenous Catheterization. During 6-OHDA lesion surgery, rats were implanted with chronic indwelling Silastic catheters (0.51 mm i.d. and 0.94 mm o.d., Fisher Scientific, Montreal, QC, Canada) in the left jugular vein. Tubing was secured to the vein by surgical silk sutures, was led s.c. to the skull surface, and was then fitted onto a 22-gauge cannula attached to a plastic connector (model number C313G-5UP; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA). The cannula/connector was fixed to the animal's skull with small stainless steel screws (Lomir, Notre-Dame-de-L'Ile Perrot, QC, Canada) and dental cement (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). To keep catheters patent, 0.1- to 0.15-ml heparinized 0.9% saline was administered at the end of surgery, on the first day of behavioral testing, and every 2 to 3 days thereafter.
Locomotor Activity Testing (Experiment 1). Horizontal locomotor activity was tested in the CPP apparatus (see below for description). Rats were first given one pre-exposure session (20 min) in the absence of drug. Each rat then received eight tests on consecutive days with cocaine given i.v. (0, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mg/kg) or i.p. (0, 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg) in a randomized order. Each test session lasted 30 min, starting immediately after injection. Test cages contained one bar and one mesh tile (see below).
Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity Testing (Experiments 2, 3, and 4). The apparatus and general procedure were as described previously (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). In brief, the procedure consisted of three phases: pre-exposure (1 day), conditioning (6 days), and test (1 day). All phases were carried out in a one-compartment box (58 cm x 29 cm x 53 cm) with walls made of white plastic-coated particle board. In the pre-exposure phase, Beta-Chip sawdust bedding covered the floor of the cage. In the conditioning phase, two square tactile tiles of either bar or mesh texture were placed in the bottom of the cage, on top of the bedding. During this phase, video tracking software (EthoVision version 3.0; Noldus Information Technology, Leesburg, VA) measured locomotor activity, expressed as horizontal distance moved (in meters). During the test phase, one bar and one mesh tile were placed on the bottom of the cage. The time spent on bar or mesh texture was measured by EthoVision software. All three phases were carried out under dark-room lighting using a Kodak GBX-2 safelight filter (Vistek, Toronto, ON, Canada), to minimize visual cues. Animals do not spontaneously prefer either texture (L. H. L. Sellings and P. B. S. Clarke, unpublished data), and all experiments were as fully counterbalanced as possible with respect to drug-texture pairing and order of drug pairing (drug-saline or saline-drug) within each surgery group. For all experiments, pre-exposure sessions lasted 20 min, and the test session lasted 10 min. Conditioning trial duration for i.v. cocaine was 15 min and for i.p. cocaine was 25 min.
For i.v. infusion (experiments 1, 2, and 4), a fluid swivel was fixed above the center of each cage. Each swivel was connected on one end to a 1-ml syringe and on the other end to a brass connector (Produits MSM, Laval, QC, Canada) and a protective spring (Heiplex, Montreal, QC, Canada) via Tygon tubing of 0.51-mm diameter. The cannula fixed to the skull of the rat was attached to the Tygon tubing, and the brass connector was fastened to the plastic connector to secure the tubing to the cannula, hence allowing administration of drug immediately after placement of the animal in the CPP cage. Drug was infused over 25 to 30 s. Cocaine administered i.p. was injected immediately before placement in the CPP cage.
Tissue Preparation. Tissue was prepared for autoradiography and Nissl staining (Cresyl violet) as described previously (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). In brief, rats were sacrificed 3 to 5 h after CPP testing by decapitation under sodium pentobarbital (65 mg/kg i.p.) anesthesia. Brains were removed, frozen in 2-methylbutane at 50°C for 30 s, and stored at 40°C.
Coronal sections (20 µm) were taken on a cryostat at several rostrocaudal levels through the ventral striatum. In experiments 1, 2, and 3, sections were examined at 11.2, 10.7, 10.2, and 9.7 mm anterior to interaural zero; 9.2 and 8.7 mm were also examined in experiment 4 (Paxinos and Watson, 1997
). Four adjacent sections were collected for autoradiography and one for Nissl staining with Cresyl violet. Sections were thaw mounted onto gelatin-subbed slides, air-dried at room temperature for 20 to 30 min, and stored with desiccant at 40°C.
Quantitative Autoradiography. The extent and chemical selectivity of the 6-OHDA lesion was quantified by autoradiographic labeling of the DA transporter (DAT) and the 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) transporter (SERT) (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
), using a nonsaturating concentration of [125I]3
-(4-iodophenyl)tropan-2-
-carboxylic acid methyl ester ([125I]RTI-55) (2200 Ci/mmol; NEN-Mandel, Guelph, ON, Canada).
Sections were thawed at room temperature for 10 min and then placed in a staining dish containing an aqueous buffer solution of 120 mM NaCl, 0.1 M sucrose, 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, and 10 pM [125I]RTI-55, with the pH adjusted to 7.4. In the DAT autoradiographic assay, 50 nM citalopram hydrobromide was used to occlude SERT; nonspecific binding was determined by addition of 10 µM 1-{2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride (GBR 12909). For SERT autoradiography, 1 µM 1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride (GBR 12935) was added to occlude DAT; nonspecific binding was determined by addition of 50 nM citalopram HBr (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). Slides were incubated at room temperature for 2 h and then washed three times in ice-cold buffer solution (once for 1 min and twice for 20 min) and for 1 to 2 s in distilled and deionized water. They were then blow-dried and placed in X-ray film cassettes. Kodak BioMax MS film (Amersham Biosciences, Baie d'Urfé, QC, Canada) was exposed to slides for 48 h (DAT) or 120 h (SERT) with 125I autoradiographic standards (Amersham Biosciences). After development of film, DAT and SERT binding were quantified using an MCID M4 imaging system (Imaging Research, St. Catherines, ON, Canada).
Histological Examination. Tissue was stained with cresyl violet to assess nonspecific damage, as described previously (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
) and examined under a light microscope (40200x magnification).
Drugs. Drug sources were as follows: cocaine HCl (gift of National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD); citalopram HBr (gift from H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark); dipyrone (Vétoquinol, Quebec, QC, Canada); ketamine HCl (Vetalar; Vetrepharm, London, ON, Canada); xylazine HCl (Anased; Novopharm, Toronto, ON, Canada); GBR 12909 (National Institute of Mental Health Chemical Synthesis and Drug Supply Program, Bethesda, MD), and GBR 12935·2HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada). Unless otherwise stated, all other chemicals were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Montreal, QC, Canada).
Cocaine HCl was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline and injected at 1 ml/kg (i.v. or i.p.). 6-OHDA HBr was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline containing 0.3 mg/ml sodium metabisulfite (Sigma-Aldrich) as an antioxidant and protected from light. Vehicle solutions as well as 6-OHDA to be infused into the medial shell or amOT were neutralized to pH 7.3 ± 0.1 with NaOH (to reduce nonspecific damage; see Results). Doses of all drugs except 6-OHDA HBr are expressed as the salt. 6-OHDA HBr doses are expressed as free base.
Data Analysis. A commercial software program (Systat v10.2; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all data analyses. In all experiments, locomotor responses to cocaine were calculated as the difference of locomotor counts between drug and saline conditioning sessions. In CPP experiments, saline locomotor scores were calculated as the mean activity over all three conditioning sessions with saline and are expressed as means ± S.E.M. After initial data inspection, sham groups were combined within each experiment. Group differences were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. CPP magnitude was calculated as the difference between time spent on the drug-paired and vehicle-paired sides during the 10-min test session. Experiments 2 and 4 were each carried out in different batches because of space constraints in the animal facility; after initial data inspection, the results within each experiment were pooled. The existence of a significant CPP magnitude or locomotor stimulant effect was determined by a one-sample Student's t test with the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The relationship between behavioral measures versus [125I]RTI-55 labeling was analyzed by multiple linear regression. A p value of <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered significant. Group data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. throughout.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
60%) also showed a minimal degree of cell loss,
30% of rats possessed a small region of decreased cell density at the infusion site (Fig. 1B), and
10% of rats showed more pronounced nonselective damage (Fig. 1C). This larger region of nonspecific damage did not extend more than 0.3 mm from the site of infusion and was almost always found at only one anterior-posterior level.
|
Sampling locations for DAT and SERT binding density are indicated in Fig. 2. [125I]RTI-55 autoradiographs of DAT binding are shown in Fig. 3. Residual DAT binding as a percentage of combined sham groups is given in Tables 2 (experiments 13) and 3 (experiment 4). Radioligand binding to SERT in tissue from lesioned animals was minimally changed by all lesion parameters in all experiments (Tables 2 and 3). In all experiments, rats were allowed 7 to 10 days recovery postsurgery before the start of behavioral testing.
|
|
|
|
The Magnitude of Core, but Not Medial Shell, DA Denervation Predicted Locomotor Responses to Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Cocaine. The effects of 6-OHDA lesions of core versus medial shell on cocaine-induced locomotion were tested most extensively in experiment 1. Locomotor responses to i.p. and i.v. cocaine are shown in Fig. 4, A and B (absolute values), and Fig. 4, C and D (saline-subtracted values). Saline test scores did not differ significantly among the three surgery groups (Fig. 4, A and B). The locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were blunted only in the core-lesioned group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed significant positive associations between core DAT binding and the locomotor stimulant response for both administration routes used and at all doses except for 0.5 mg/kg i.v. (range p < 0.001p < 0.05). Significant negative associations were observed between medial shell DAT binding and the locomotor stimulant response at several cocaine doses (1 mg/kg i.v. and 5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.; p < 0.05p < 0.005).
|
The effects of core and medial shell 6-OHDA lesions on cocaine-induced locomotion were also tested in two CPP experiments (i.e., experiments 2 and 3). Locomotor data were obtained from the three drug and saline conditioning sessions. Experiment 2 examined the locomotor stimulant response to cocaine (0.5 mg/kg i.v.). Here, saline locomotor scores did not differ significantly among groups and were as follows: 52 ± 2 m (sham), 54 ± 2 m (core 6-OHDA), and 55 ± 2 m (medial shell 6-OHDA). A significant locomotor stimulant effect was observed in sham-lesioned and medial shell-lesioned animals, but not in the core-lesioned subjects (Fig. 5A). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a positive trend between the locomotor response and DAT binding in the core (p = 0.086; Fig. 5B) but not medial shell (Fig. 5C).
|
|
Conditioned Place Preference for Intraperitoneal Cocaine Was Unaffected by Lesions of Core or Medial Shell. In experiment 3, a significant CPP to i.p. cocaine occurred in the sham-lesioned group, with a similar trend in the two lesion groups (Fig. 6D). No significant relationship was observed between the CPP magnitude and core or medial shell DAT binding (Fig. 6, E and F).
CPP Magnitude for Intravenous Cocaine Was Related to OT Residual DAT Binding. It was recently reported that amOT more robustly supports intracranial self-infusion of cocaine than does medial shell (see Discussion). Therefore, we first re-examined the data from experiment 2 (i.v. cocaine) to determine whether amOT DAT binding may have contributed significantly to the CPP magnitude. However, amOT binding was reduced only slightly in this experiment (by 28% in the core- and 11% in the shell-lesioned group). We therefore addressed the question of amOT involvement by directly comparing the effects of 6-OHDA lesions of the medial shell versus amOT on i.v. cocaine CPP (experiment 4).
Infusions of 6-OHDA into either amOT or medial shell depleted DAT binding locally and also tended to produce a smaller and variable depletion in the other structure (Fig. 7). Initial analysis revealed a high degree of colinearity existing in DAT binding levels between different OT subregions. Accordingly, these values were averaged, and subsequent analyses were carried out using OT rather than amOT values.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methodological Considerations. The present series of experiments revealed associations between residual DA innervation in various ventral striatal structures and cocaine-induced locomotion or CPP. It is doubtful that these relationships represent segregation between conditioned and unconditioned drug effects rather than between reward and locomotion, as core but not medial shell 6-OHDA lesions abolished amphetamine-induced conditioned locomotion (Sellings and Clarke, 2006
).
In the present study, quantitative autoradiographic analysis was performed by taking a large number of samples within each structure (e.g., 24 each for medial shell and core). Within each targeted structure, the extent of DAT depletion appeared rather uniform (see Fig. 3 and Sellings and Clarke, 2003
), and visual inspection revealed no evidence for smaller sites of preferential depletion. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that our behavioral effects resulted from damage to functionally important "hot spots" within the targeted structures.
It is unlikely that nonspecific damage caused these lesion effects, since only minimal changes were observed in SERT binding levels, and Nissl staining revealed only slight nonspecific damage in a subset of medial shell- and medial OT-lesioned animals (Fig. 1). However, 6-OHDA infusion almost certainly depleted noradrenaline as well as DA. Preservation of noradrenergic terminals by using systemic desipramine proved impossible, since in pilot studies the routinely used dose of 25 mg/kg (Kelly and Iversen, 1976
) caused significant mortality (>25%). Nevertheless, for several reasons, it is unlikely that the observed lesion effects were due to loss of noradrenergic terminals. First, neither noradrenergic agonists nor antagonists, when injected into ventral striatum, affected locomotion (Pijnenburg et al., 1975
, 1976
). Second, noradrenergic denervation of ventral striatum does not alter locomotor stimulant responses to cocaine and amphetamine (Roberts et al., 1975
; Kelly and Iversen, 1976
). Third, noradrenergic afferents to NAcc largely avoid the core (Delfs et al., 1998
), where lesion effects on locomotor stimulation occurred. Fourth, stimulation of noradrenergic transmission did not produce CPP (Martin-Iverson et al., 1985
; Subhan et al., 2000
). Fifth, neither
-nor
-adrenergic receptor antagonists affected the rewarding effects of i.v. cocaine as reflected by self-administration behavior (Johanson and Fischman, 1989
). Sixth, the disruptive effects of 6-OHDA lesions on cocaine self-administration appear to be unrelated to noradrenaline depletion (Roberts et al., 1975
, 1977
). Lastly, self-administration of cocaine directly into the amOT was blocked by coinfusion of a D1 or D2 DA receptor antagonist (Ikemoto, 2003
). On this basis, it seems reasonable to conclude that our 6-OHDA lesions produced their behavioral effects via local depletion of DA.
The Accumbens Core and Locomotor Activation. There is currently no consensus on the role of core versus shell in psychostimulant-induced locomotion (Boye et al., 2001
; Ikemoto, 2002
, and references therein). In particular, studies with intra-accumbens microinjection of direct or indirect DAergic agonists have implicated core, shell, or both structures, depending on the drug. For example, amphetamine acted with similar potency at either injection site, whereas cocaine stimulated locomotor activity most strongly after injection into medial OT and medial shell (Ikemoto, 2002
). Importantly, locomotor responses from accumbens core injections of cocaine may have been weakened by local anesthesia (Ikemoto and Witkin, 2003
).
The present experiments show that the locomotor stimulant effects of systemically administered cocaine are associated with DAergic neurotransmission in core rather than medial shell. This result generalized to several doses of the drug and to both i.p. and i.v. routes of administration. These findings accord with observations using systemic amphetamine (Boye et al., 2001
; Sellings and Clarke, 2003
, and references therein) and methylphenidate (L. H. L. Sellings, L. E. McQuade, and P. B. S. Clarke, manuscript submitted for publication). Taken together, they suggest a general mechanism by which systemically administered psychostimulants produce activating effects. Whether core DA transmission directly mediates the locomotor stimulant action of these drugs or plays an indirect enabling role remains a question for the future.
Differences between Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Cocaine CPP. In the present study, i.v. cocaine produced CPP that appears to be dependent on DA transmission in both medial shell and OT. In contrast, i.p. cocaine CPP did not appear to be dependent on accumbens DA transmission. This finding is consistent with reports suggesting that i.v. cocaine produces DA-dependent CPP and i.p. cocaine produces DA-independent CPP (Morency and Beninger, 1986
; Spyraki et al., 1987
). Although neuroadaptation may account for the lack of lesion effect on i.p. cocaine CPP, this appears unlikely considering the fact that similar medial shell lesions reduced CPP both for i.v. cocaine and for amphetamine (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
). Our results do not rule out other forms of accumbens involvement; indeed glutamatergic and serotonergic manipulations within this structure affect i.p. cocaine CPP (Kaddis et al., 1995
; Harris et al., 2001
).
Because cocaine produces CPP more potently after i.v. than after i.p. administration (Spyraki et al., 1987
; O'Dell et al., 1996
), care was taken in the present study to select submaximal i.p. and i.v. doses of cocaine approximately matched in terms of CPP magnitude. Hence, it is likely that the differential sensitivity to DA depletion reflected route of administration and not dose.
The neurochemical basis of this differential susceptibility cannot readily be related to changes in extracellular DA. The i.v. dose used (0.5 mg/kg) has been reported to increase dialysate DA levels in the medial shell but not the core (Pontieri et al., 1995
), whereas the i.p. dose (10 mg/kg) robustly increased DA levels in both subregions (Cadoni et al., 2000
). Another reported difference between i.v. and i.p. cocaine administration is that only the former caused significant increases in glucose metabolism in NAcc and OT (Porrino, 1993
); in the latter study, the use of a wide range of doses suggests strongly that route of administration was the critical factor. The basis for route-dependent effects on cerebral glucose utilization and the possible relation to cocaine reward remain to be elucidated.
Cocaine CPP: Dependence on Both Medial Shell and OT. Although there is a rich body of literature linking the NAcc to drug reward, possible OT involvement has been largely unexamined (Clarke et al., 1990
; Kornetsky et al., 1991
; Ikemoto, 2003
; Ikemoto et al., 2005
; Ikemoto and Donahue, 2005
). The present results suggest that both medial shell and OT play important roles in mediating i.v. cocaine reward.
Self-administration of cocaine directly into the ventral striatum appears strongly site-dependent; responding was vigorous for infusions into amOT, marginal in medial shell, and negligible within accumbens core (Rodd-Henricks et al., 2002
; Ikemoto, 2003
). In addition, only cocaine infusion at amOT sites produced CPP at the doses tested (Ikemoto, 2003
). However, the behavioral effects of focal cocaine infusion into the NAcc (shell or core) may be masked by local anesthesia (Ikemoto and Witkin, 2003
). Nevertheless, DA antagonist microinjection experiments suggest that it is the medial shell rather than the core that mediates the reinforcing effects of self-administered i.v. cocaine (Bari and Pierce, 2005
).
In experiment 2, lesions of the medial shell reduced i.v. cocaine CPP independently of accumbens core; in this experiment, DA denervation in the OT was minimal. When 6-OHDA infusions of medial shell and OT were directly compared (experiment 4), only OT DA innervation significantly predicted i.v. cocaine CPP. These results may indicate that the OT is a stronger mediator of cocaine reward, as concluded from findings based on intracranial cocaine infusion (Ikemoto, 2003
). It is unlikely that these lesion effects represent disruptions of memory or learning, as medial shell lesions did not affect CPP induced by morphine (Sellings and Clarke, 2003
) or i.p. cocaine (present study), and extensive 6-OHDA lesions of OT did not disrupt amphetamine CPP (Clarke et al., 1990
).
Several factors could determine the relative contributions of OT versus medial shell to psychostimulant CPP. First, the nature of the CPP paradigm used may be a factor. Our CPP procedure is based on tactile cues; other types of stimuli may engage other ventral striatal subregions. Another factor of potential importance is the drug in question. Our results suggest that i.v. cocaine CPP engages OT mechanisms. This does not appear to be the case for i.p. amphetamine CPP (Clarke et al., 1990
).
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: NAcc, nucleus accumbens; CPP, conditioned place preference; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; DAergic, dopaminergic; DA, dopamine; OT, olfactory tubercle; amOT, anteromedial olfactory tubercle; DAT, dopamine transporter; SERT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) transporter; RTI-55, 3
-(4-iodophenyl)tropan-2-
-carboxylic acid methyl ester; GBR 12909; 1-{2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl}-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride; GBR 12935, 1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Paul B. S. Clarke, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler Room 1325, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1Y6. E-mail: paul.clarke{at}mcgill.ca
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bari AA and Pierce RC (2005) D1-like and D2-dopamine receptor antagonists administered into the shell subregion of the rat nucleus accumbens decrease cocaine, but not food, reinforcement. Neuroscience 135: 959968.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boye SM, Grant RJ, and Clarke PB (2001) Disruption of dopaminergic neurotransmission in nucleus accumbens core inhibits the locomotor stimulant effects of nicotine and D-amphetamine in rats. Neuropharmacology 40: 792805.[Medline]
Cadoni C, Solinas M, and Di Chiara G (2000) Psychostimulant sensitization: differential changes in accumbal shell and core dopamine. Eur J Pharmacol 388: 6976.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clarke PBS, Jakubovic A, and Fibiger HC (1988) Anatomical analysis of the involvement of mesolimbocortical dopamine in the locomotor stimulant actions of D-amphetamine and apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 96: 511520.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clarke PBS, White NM, and Franklin KB (1990) 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the olfactory tubercle do not alter (+)-amphetamine-conditioned place preference. Behav Brain Res 36: 185188.[Medline]
Cools AR (1986) Mesolimbic dopamine and its control of locomotor activity in rats: differences in pharmacology and light/dark periodicity between the olfactory tubercle and the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 88: 451459.[Medline]
Delfs JM, Zhu Y, Druhan JP, and Aston-Jones GS (1998) Origin of noradrenergic afferents to the shell subregion of the nucleus accumbens: anterograde and retrograde tract-tracing studies in the rat. Brain Res 806: 127140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Di Chiara G, Bassareo V, Fenu S, De Luca MA, Spina L, Cadoni C, Acquas E, Carboni E, Valentini V, and Lecca D (2004) Dopamine and drug addiction: the nucleus accumbens shell connection. Neuropharmacology 47 (Suppl 1): 227241.
Everitt BJ and Wolf ME (2002) Psychomotor stimulant addiction: a neural systems perspective. J Neurosci 22: 33123320.
Harris GC, Altomare K, and Aston-Jones G (2001) Preference for a cocaine-associated environment is attenuated by augmented accumbal serotonin in cocaine withdrawn rats. Psychopharmacology 156: 1422.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ikemoto S (2002) Ventral striatal anatomy of locomotor activity induced by cocaine, D-amphetamine, dopamine and D1/D2 agonists. Neuroscience 113: 939955.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ikemoto S (2003) Involvement of the olfactory tubercle in cocaine reward: intracranial self-administration studies. J Neurosci 23: 93059311.
Ikemoto S and Donahue KM (2005) A five-minute, but not a fifteen-minute, conditioning trial duration induces conditioned place preference for cocaine administration into the olfactory tubercle. Synapse 56: 5759.[Medline]
Ikemoto S, Qin M, and Liu ZH (2005) The functional divide for primary reinforcement of D-amphetamine lies between the medial and lateral ventral striatum: is the division of the accumbens core, shell and olfactory tubercle valid? J Neurosci 25: 50615065.
Ikemoto S and Wise RA (2004) Mapping of chemical trigger zones for reward. Neuropharmacology 47 (Suppl 1): 190201.
Ikemoto S and Witkin BM (2003) Locomotor inhibition induced by procaine injections into the nucleus accumbens core, but not the medial ventral striatum: implication for cocaine-induced locomotion. Synapse 47: 117122.[Medline]
Johanson CE and Fischman MW (1989) The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse. Pharmacol Rev 41: 352.[Medline]
Kaddis FG, Uretsky NJ, and Wallace LJ (1995) DNQX in the nucleus accumbens inhibits cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Brain Res 697: 7682.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelly PH and Iversen SD (1976) Selective 6-OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 40: 4556.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koob GF, Sanna PP, and Bloom FE (1998) Neuroscience of addiction. Neuron 21: 467476.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kornetsky C, Huston-Lyons D, and Porrino LJ (1991) The role of the olfactory tubercle in the effects of cocaine, morphine and brain-stimulation reward. Brain Res 541: 7581.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin-Iverson MT, Ortmann R, and Fibiger HC (1985) Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine. Brain Res 332: 5967.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morency MA and Beninger RJ (1986) Dopaminergic substrates of cocaine-induced place conditioning. Brain Res 399: 3341.[CrossRef][Medline]
O'Dell LE, Khroyan TV, and Neisewander JL (1996) Dose-dependent characterization of the rewarding and stimulant properties of cocaine following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 123: 144153.[Medline]
Paxinos G and Watson C (1997) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th ed, Academic Press, San Diego.
Pecina S and Berridge KC (2005) Hedonic hot spot in nucleus accumbens shell: where do mu-opioids cause increased hedonic impact of sweetness? J Neurosci 25: 1177711786.
Pijnenburg AJ, Honig WM, Van der Heyden JA, and van Rossum JM (1976) Effects of chemical stimulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system upon locomotor activity. Eur J Pharmacol 35: 4558.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pijnenburg AJ, Honig WM, and van Rossum JM (1975) Effects of antagonists upon locomotor stimulation induced by injection of dopamine and noradrenaline into the nucleus accumbens of nialamide-pretreated rats. Psychopharmacologia 41: 175180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pontieri FE, Tanda G, and Di Chiara G (1995) Intravenous cocaine, morphine and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the "shell" as compared with the "core" of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 1230412308.
Porrino LJ (1993) Functional consequences of acute cocaine treatment depend on route of administration. Psychopharmacology 112: 343351.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roberts DCS, Corcoran ME, and Fibiger HC (1977) On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6: 615620.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roberts DCS, Zis AP, and Fibiger HC (1975) Ascending catecholamine pathways and amphetamine-induced locomotor activity: importance of dopamine and apparent non-involvement of norepinephrine. Brain Res 93: 441454.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodd-Henricks ZA, McKinzie DL, Li TK, Murphy JM, and McBride WJ (2002) Cocaine is self-administered into the shell but not the core of the nucleus accumbens of Wistar rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303: 12161226.
Sellings LHL and Clarke PBS (2003) Segregation of amphetamine reward and locomotor stimulation between nucleus accumbens medial shell and core. J Neurosci 23: 62956303.
Sellings LHL and Clarke PBS (2006) 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of nucleus accumbens core abolish amphetamine-induced conditioned activity. Synapse 59: 374377.[Medline]
Spyraki C, Nomikos GG, and Varonos DD (1987) Intravenous cocaine-induced place preference: attenuation by haloperidol. Behav Brain Res 26: 5762.[CrossRef][Medline]
Subhan F, Deslandes PN, Pache DM, and Sewell RD (2000) Do antidepressants affect motivation in conditioned place preference? Eur J Pharmacol 408: 257263.[Medline]
van Dongen YC, Deniau JM, Pennartz CM, Galis-de Graaf Y, Voorn P, Thierry AM, and Groenewegen HJ (2005) Anatomical evidence for direct connections between the shell and core subregions of the rat nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience 136: 10491071.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wise RA (2004) Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 483494.[Medline]
Zahm DS and Brog JS (1992) On the significance of subterritories in the "accumbens" part of the rat ventral striatum. Neuroscience 50: 751767.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||