![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CARDIOVASCULAR
9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
School of Biomedical Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Received September 19, 2005; accepted December 9, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), produces peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
-mediated vasorelaxation of conduit arteries. We have now investigated whether incubation with THC affects agonist-stimulated contractile (methoxamine) and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant (acetylcholine) responses in the rat superior mesenteric artery (G0) and aorta by myography. We have also investigated whether similar responses are observed in isolated resistance (G3) vessels of the mesenteric bed. In both the aorta and G0, incubation with 10 µM THC for 2 h, but not 10 min, significantly attenuated the contractile responses to methoxamine. This effect of THC was abolished in the presence of the enzyme catalase, which breaks down H2O2, and was reduced in the presence of the superoxide dismutase inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DETCA), but it was not PPAR
-mediated. THC also inhibited calcium influx in a H2O2-dependent manner. In G0, but not the aorta, incubation with 10 µM THC for 2 h significantly enhanced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. This was inhibited by a PPAR
antagonist, 2-chloro-5-nitro-N-phenylbenzamide (GW9662), catalase, and DETCA, but not by the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. By contrast, in G3, no time-dependent vasorelaxation of precontracted arteries to THC was observed, and incubation with THC led to potentiation of contractile responses and blunting of vasorelaxation to acetylcholine, which seems to involve inhibition of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) production, and agonist-stimulated production of EDHF. These data demonstrate further the time-dependent vascular actions of THC and also highlight the heterogenous effects of THC in different arterial types.
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), was identified, followed by the discovery of an endogenous ligand for this receptor, anandamide (Devane et al., 1992
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) belong to a family of nuclear receptors of which there are three isoforms:
,
, and
(Ferre, 2004
). When activated, PPARs translocate to the nucleus where they heterodimerize with the retinoid X receptor and bind to DNA sequences, leading to the transcription of responsive genes (for review, see Bishop-Bailey, 2000
). PPAR
was traditionally thought to be involved mainly in adipogenesis; however, it has recently become clear that PPAR
is widely expressed with a range of physiological roles (Braissant et al., 1996
; Bishop-Bailey, 2000
). PPAR
agonists are used in the management of type 2 diabetes (Ferre, 2004
; Rangwala and Lazar, 2004
), but they have also been shown to have additional positive cardiovascular effects (Bishop-Bailey, 2000
; Hsueh and Bruemmer, 2004
). These include in vitro evidence of increased availability of NO and in vivo reductions in blood pressure, anti-inflammatory actions, and attenuation of atherosclerosis after PPAR
administration. We have also shown that the PPAR
ligand rosiglitazone causes time-dependent, protein synthesis-dependent vasorelaxation of the rat aorta (Cunnane et al., 2004
).
PPARs are relatively promiscuous and are activated by a number of natural and synthetic ligands. Recent evidence has shown that various cannabinoid compounds and their and metabolites activate PPARs. The endocannabinoid oleylethanolamide regulates feeding through activation of PPAR
(Fu et al., 2003
), and metabolism of another endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, causes release of 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid glyceryl ester, a PPAR
agonist (Kozak et al., 2002
). Similarly, the endocannabinoid palmitolyethanolamide has anti-inflammatory properties mediated by PPAR
(Lo Verme et al., 2005
). It has also been reported that ajulemic acid, a THC metabolite analog, binds to PPAR
with potential anti-inflammatory actions (Liu et al., 2003
). On this basis, we previously investigated whether THC itself is a PPAR
ligand, causing time-dependent vasorelaxant effects via PPAR
activation and demonstrated that THC is indeed a PPAR
ligand, activation of which increases superoxide dismutase activity, leading to time-dependent vasorelaxation through increased bioavailability of nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide production (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
).
The aims of the present study were therefore to investigate further the time-dependent effects of THC in conduit arteries by studying the ability of THC to modulate agonist-stimulated vasorelaxation and vasoconstriction. Because our previous work investigated only larger conduit arteries (the superior mesenteric artery and aorta), we have now also investigated the time-dependent effects of THC in isolated mesenteric resistance arteries.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of THC on Contractile Responses. In G3, G0, and the aorta, the effects of THC on contractile function were examined by constructing concentration-response curves to methoxamine in adjacent segments of artery 2 h after adding either 10 µM THC or 5 µl of ethanol (vehicle) to the organ baths. For all arteries, tone was readjusted to 0.5 g before the addition of methoxamine because over the 2-h incubation period, there tended to be both increases and decreases in tone, although it was not observed that there was a consistent change in tone in response to THC from baseline. The effects of long-term incubation with THC were compared with the acute effects of 10 µM THC where methoxamine concentration-response curves were performed 10 min after addition of THC or vehicle. In each case, there was no difference between adjacent segments in their ability to contract to a high potassium solution before the incubation periods; therefore, the contractile potential of each segment should be similar.
The possible contribution of alterations in NO were established by performing experiments in the presence of the nitric-oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 300 µM), which was added to the Krebs' solution and present throughout the entire experiment. In G3 vessels, the role of prostanoids in the response to THC was assessed by performing experiments in the presence of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10 µM). Again, indomethacin was added to the Krebs' solution and present throughout the entire experiment A role for hydrogen peroxide production was investigated by performing experiments in the presence of the catalase (2500 U/ml), which metabolizes H2O2 into water and oxygen and thus terminates the biological actions of H2O2. Catalase was added to the Krebs' solution and present throughout the entire experiment. To test whether changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity contribute to the vascular effects of THC, vessels were pretreated with the SOD inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DETCA; 3 mM) added 30 min before the addition of THC or vehicle (Paisley and Martin, 1996
). A potential role for PPAR
activation was investigated using the PPAR
antagonist GW9662 (1 mM; Leesnitzer et al., 2002
). In these experiments, GW9662 was added to the organ baths 10 min before the 2-h THC incubation. In G3 vessels, to establish a role for changes in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) production, some experiments were performed in the presence of L-NAME and indomethacin in combination with 100 nM charybdotoxin (ChTX) to block large calcium-activated K+ channels and voltage-sensitive K+ channels and 500 nM apamin to block small calcium-activated K+ channels because this combination inhibits EDHF responses. In some experiments, the effects of ChTX and apamin alone in the buffer were tested. In all cases, the potassium channels blockers were added to the organ baths 10 min before the 2-h THC incubation.
Effects of THC on Agonist-Stimulated Vasorelaxant Responses. In G3, G0, and the aorta, the effects of long-term incubation (2 h) with 10 µM THC on agonist-stimulated vasorelaxation were examined by performing concentration-response curves to acetylcholine in vehicle- and THC-treated adjacent segments of artery precontracted by the methoxamine concentration-response curve as described above (maximum dose 100 µM methoxamine). A potential role for NO (L-NAME; 300 µM), hydrogen peroxide (catalase; 2500 U/ml), SOD activity (DETCA; 3 mM), or EDHF inhibition (30 µM L-NAME, 10 µM indomethacin, 100 nM ChTX, and 500 nM apamin) were examined in subsequent experiments.
Effects of THC on Calcium Channels. To investigate the effects of THC on calcium influx, concentration-response curves to CaCl2 (1 µM100 mM) were performed in vehicle controls and in the presence of 10 µM THC for 2 h. The vessels were first allowed to equilibrate in calcium-free Krebs' and were then bathed in calcium-free, high potassium (80 mM) Krebs' solution. After 2 h, a concentration-response curve to CaCl2 was constructed. Some experiments were also performed in the presence of catalase (2500 U/ml) to inhibit hydrogen peroxide activity.
Statistical Analysis. The concentration of vasorelaxant giving the half-maximal response (EC50) and maximal responses (Rmax) were obtained from the concentration-response curve fitted to a sigmoidal logistic equation with the minimum vasorelaxation set to zero using the GraphPad Prism package (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) (Tep-areenan et al., 2003
). Rmax and pEC50 (negative logarithm of the EC50) values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. The number of animals in each group is represented by n. In each protocol, the difference between THC-treated and vehicle-treated vessels was analyzed by paired Student's t test. Other data were compared, as appropriate, by Student's t test or by analysis of variance with statistical significance between manipulations and controls determined by Dunnett's post hoc test.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Mechanisms of Time-Dependent Effects of THC in the Isolated Aorta (Tables 1 and 2). The inhibitory effects of THC on contractile responses to methoxamine were not affected if vessels were washed out after the 2-h incubation period (THC 2-h Rmax = 1.74 ± 0.18 g cf. THC 2-h and washout Rmax = 1.97 ± 0.29 g; n = 5; Fig. 2A). Additionally, short-term incubation with 10 µM THC for 10 min did not significantly alter the subsequent contractile responses to methoxamine (n = 7; Fig. 2B). In the presence of L-NAME, THC continued to significantly inhibit the contractile responses to methoxamine (n = 5; Fig. 2C). The inhibitory effects of THC on methoxamine-induced responses in the aorta were also not affected by the PPAR
antagonist GW9662 (1 mM; n = 6; Fig. 2D). However, in the presence of catalase, there was no difference in the contractile response between vehicle- and THC-treated vessels (n = 8; Fig. 2E). In the presence of the SOD inhibitor DETCA (3 mM), THC inhibited the effects of methoxamine compared with vehicle-treated vessels (n = 7; Fig. 2F). However, the percentage of inhibition of the methoxamine response caused by THC in the presence of DETCA was significantly less than in the control situation (control 49.8 ± 5.4% inhibition cf. DETCA 24.1 ± 5.4% inhibition; P < 0.05; analysis of variance) (percentage of inhibition in the presence L-NAME = 44.1 ± 9.4, percentage of inhibition in the presence of GW9662 = 53.0 ± 7.3).
|
The contractile responses to the reintroduction of calcium in a calcium-free, high potassium Krebs-Henseleit solution was significantly reduced after incubation with 10 µM THC for 2 h in the lower concentration range (10300 µM CaCl2; Student's t test paired analysis; P < 0.05; n = 9; Fig. 3A). In the presence of catalase, this effect of THC was reversed such that arteries incubated with THC tended to contract more to the reintroduction of calcium than vehicle-treated vessels (Fig. 3B). The vasorelaxant effects of acetylcholine were not altered under any conditions in the presence of THC (Fig. 4, AF).
|
|
In summary, 2-h incubation with 10 µM THC in the aorta leads to the inhibition of contractile responses to methoxamine, which are time-dependent, not washed out, involve hydrogen peroxide, and partly involve SOD activity, but do not involve nitric oxide or the PPAR
receptor. THC also blocks calcium channels in the aorta, also involving hydrogen peroxide. THC incubation for 2 h had no effect on subsequent vasorelaxant response to acetylcholine.
Mechanisms of Time-Dependent Effects of THC in the Superior Mesenteric Artery (Tables 1 and 2). Short-term incubation with THC for 10 min did not significantly alter the subsequent contractile responses to methoxamine (n = 5; Fig. 5B). In the presence of L-NAME, THC significantly reduced the contractile response to methoxamine (n = 6; Fig. 5C). However, in the presence of the hydrogen peroxide-inhibiting enzyme catalase, the inhibitory effects of THC on methoxamine-induced responses were absent (n = 6; Fig. 5E). In the presence of the SOD inhibitor DETCA (3 mM), THC inhibited the contractile responses to methoxamine (n = 7; Fig. 5F), although this inhibitory effect tended to be smaller than that seen in the control experiments where THC caused around 50% inhibition of the methoxamine response (in the presence of DETCA, this was approximately 25%; see Fig. 5, A and F). The inhibitory effects of THC on methoxamine responses in the superior mesenteric artery were not affected by the PPAR
antagonist GW9662 (n = 6; Fig. 5D).
|
The contractile responses to the reintroduction of calcium in a calcium-free, high potassium Krebs-Hensleit solution were significantly reduced in the presence of THC from 100 µM to 3 µM (n = 7; Fig. 6A). The inhibitory effect of THC was abolished when similar experiments were performed in the presence of catalase (n = 5; Fig. 6B).
|
antagonist GW9662 (n = 6; Fig. 7D).
|
receptor. Two-hour incubation with THC also leads to an augmentation of the vasorelaxant response to acetylcholine, which was inhibited by hydrogen peroxide inhibition, SOD inhibition, and antagonism of the PPAR
receptor.
Time-Dependent Effects of THC in G3 Resistance Arteries. In G3 vessels, 10 µM THC caused acute vasorelaxation during the first 15 min after administration. However, after 30 min, there was no difference between the THC- and vehicle-treated vessels (Fig. 8A), such that unlike that observed in the conduit vessels (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
), no time-dependent vasorelaxation to THC was seen in G3 vessels (Fig. 8A). Additionally, unlike conduit vessels (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
), the PPAR
antagonist GW9662 (1 µM) had no effect on vascular responses to THC over time in G3 vessels (Fig. 8B).
|
|
Incubation with 10 µM THC for 2 h inhibited the vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine (vehicle pEC50 = 7.96 ± 0.10 cf. THC pEC50 = 7.49 ± 0.10; n = 5; P < 0.01; Fig. 1B). In the presence of L-NAME (Fig. 10A), THC greatly attenuated the vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine. The effect of THC became more prominent with prolonged incubation, because although incubation for 10 min with THC caused some attenuation of the acetylcholine response, this was not significantly different from vehicle-treated vessels (vehicle pEC50 = 7.83 ± 0.23 cf. THC pEC50 = 7.58 ± 0.30; n = 7; Fig. 10B). In the presence of catalase, THC significantly inhibited the maximal vasorelaxant response to acetylcholine (vehicle Rmax = 93.3 ± 3.6% relaxation cf. THC Rmax = 73.8 ± 4.8% relaxation; n = 6; P < 0.01; Fig. 10C). Under conditions known to inhibit EDHF activity (in the presence of L-NAME and indomethacin in combination with apamin and charybdotoxin), there was no difference in the maximal relaxant response to acetylcholine between vehicle-treated and THC-treated vessels (10 µM; 2 h) (vehicle Rmax = 30.5 ± 2.2% relaxation cf. THC Rmax = 34.4 ± 2.6% relaxation; n = 5; Fig. 10D). The remaining relaxation to acetylcholine obtained under these conditions was inhibited using catalase, again with no difference between vehicle- and THC-treated vessels (vehicle Rmax = 10.4 ± 1.4% relaxation cf. THC Rmax = 12.0 ± 1.0% relaxation; n = 3; Fig. 10D).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
antagonism and also involved increased stimulated hydrogen peroxide production. By contrast, in isolated mesenteric resistance vessels, THC potentiated the vasoconstrictor effects of methoxamine and inhibited endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation, which seemed to be through the blockade of EDHF activity. These data highlight that the vascular effects of THC are dependent on the vasodilator mechanisms prevalent in a given artery.
We have previously demonstrated that THC produces time-dependent vasorelaxation, which was dependent on an intact endothelium, nitric oxide availability, hydrogen peroxide production, and superoxide dismutase (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
). Importantly, we showed that these effects were mediated by PPAR
activation. These novel data have led to several questions as to whether THC has similar effects in the cardiovascular system as other PPAR
ligands. Our present study first aimed to further characterize the in vitro effects of long-term THC exposure to establish whether preincubation with THC would lead to changes in agonist-stimulated responses as a consequence of altered protein activity caused by PPAR
activation. We now show that in conduit arteries (the superior mesenteric artery and aorta), incubation with THC causes significant blunting of the vasoconstrictor response to methoxamine and that this is a time-dependent event that persists after washout. In both vessels, the effects of THC were not affected by the presence of the nitric-oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME and were therefore not because of changes in nitric oxide production. However, in the presence of catalase, which metabolizes H2O2 into water and oxygen and thus terminates the biological actions of H2O2, the effects of THC were inhibited, suggesting that THC inhibits contractile responses through increased H2O2 production. SOD catalyzes the conversion of superoxides to H2O2, so we investigated the effects of THC on methoxamine-induced contractile responses in the presence of a SOD inhibitor, DETCA. We found that DETCA reduced the inhibitory effects of THC, indicating that THC increases H2O2 production by enhancing SOD activity. We also showed that preincubation with THC significantly reduced the vasoconstrictor responses to calcium reintroduction in a calcium-free high potassium solution, suggesting that blockade of calcium entry by THC may also contribute to the blunting of methoxamine-induced responses in both the aorta and superior mesenteric artery. Interestingly, this response to THC was inhibited in the presence of catalase, implicating that blockade of calcium channels by THC involves H2O2 production. In support of these data, it has been previously shown that incubation with H2O2 inhibits agonist-stimulated contractions, although the underlying mechanisms for this remained unclear (Iesaki et al., 1994
). Additionally, a role for Ca2+ channel blockade has been implicated in the vasorelaxant effects of H2O2 in the rat aorta (Yang et al., 1999
). Our data would support this suggestion as we found that the contractile response to calcium reintroduction was increased in the presence of catalase, suggesting that basal H2O2 might play a role in the modulation of calcium channels. To summarize, our data suggest that through an increase in SOD activity, THC stimulates H2O2 production, which leads to calcium channel blockade and subsequent inhibition of contractile responses.
In the superior mesenteric artery, it was found that incubation with THC for 2 h led to a significant augmentation of the endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine. This effect of THC persisted in the presence of L-NAME, and was therefore not because of increased stimulation of NO release, but it was inhibited in the presence of catalase and DETCA, again pointing toward a role for increased agoniststimulated H2O2 release through increased SOD activity. It has been previously shown that some of the endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant effects of acetylcholine are through the release of H2O2 in certain vessels (Matoba et al., 2000
; Hatoum et al., 2005
). Thus, the difference in results obtained between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery may be explained by the fact that in the aorta, H2O2 does not seem to play a role in the vasorelaxant response to acetylcholine, as indicated by the complete inhibition of responses to acetylcholine in the aorta in the presence of L-NAME. However, in the superior mesenteric artery, there was residual vasorelaxation to acetylcholine in the presence of L-NAME, which was sensitive to catalase, indicating a role for H2O2 in the vasorelaxation to acetylcholine in this vessel. It is important to also note that the augmented responses to acetylcholine induced by THC in the presence of L-NAME were also sensitive to catalase, further confirming that the augmented endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation to acetylcholine caused by THC were through augmented stimulated release of H2O2.
Unlike the blunting effect of THC on contractile response to methoxamine in the superior mesenteric artery, the increased endothelium-dependent relaxant responses following THC incubation in the vessel were inhibited by the PPAR
antagonist GW9662, which is in line with our previous finding that time-dependent vasorelaxation to THC is PPAR
-mediated (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
). It has also previously been shown that PPAR
ligand treatment augments/restores vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine in various models of endothelial dysfunction, including diabetes (Kanie et al., 2003
; Majithiya et al., 2005
) and hypertension (Ryan et al., 2004
). Additionally, a recent study has shown that PPAR
ligands (ciglitazone or 15-deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2) stimulate both activity and expression of Cu/Zn-SOD in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (Hwang et al., 2005
), which is also consistent with the present data. Because the time-dependent, SOD-dependent effects of THC on methoxamine-induced responses were PPAR
-independent, it may be that THC is capable of increasing SOD activity and H2O2 production through both PPAR
-dependent and -independent mechanisms. It is of note that vasorelaxant effects of acetylcholine in the presence of GW9662 were reduced in both the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery. Our current knowledge of the pharmacology of GW9662 is incomplete, and it is possible that it may have additional pharmacological actions. The acetylcholine response is dependent on several components, including muscarinic receptor activation, nitric-oxide synthase activity, potassium channel, and gap junctional communication, and it is therefore conceivable that actions of GW9662 at one or more of these sites could reduce the response to acetylcholine. Accordingly, further work is required to define the pharmacological activity of GW9662.
We previously reported that THC causes time-dependent, PPAR
-mediated vasorelaxation of conduit arteries (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
). In the present study, we have examined whether a similar response to THC is observed in isolated resistance arteries of the mesenteric arterial bed. Although 10 µM THC caused the expected acute vasorelaxation of resistance vessels (O'Sullivan et al., 2005b
), after 30 min, there was no difference between the THC-treated and vehicle-treated vessels; furthermore, PPAR
antagonism had no effect on the THC response in resistance vessels at any time point. Thus, unlike in the aorta and superior mesenteric artery (O'Sullivan et al., 2005a
), there is no time-dependent PPAR
-mediated vasorelaxation to THC in resistance mesenteric arteries. Although our data do not point toward a reason for the heterogeneity between vessel types, it might be speculated that this could be because of differences in expression and/or function of the PPAR
receptor between tissues. Because G3 vessels did not respond similarly to THC as conduit arteries, it was not surprising to find that incubation with THC had the opposite effect on G3 arteries as on conduit vessels; potentiation of methoxamine-induced contractile responses and significant inhibition of vasorelaxant response to acetylcholine. The potentiation of methoxamine responses in G3 were not time-dependent (i.e., were also observed if THC was incubated for only 10 min), persisted in the presence of indomethacin, but were abolished in the presence of L-NAME or after EDHF inhibition. Collectively, this indicates that in G3, THC inhibits nitric oxide and EDHF basal activity but not prostaglandins, leading to enhanced vasoconstrictor responsiveness. Furthermore, in G3, THC significantly reduced the vasorelaxant responses to acetylcholine. It was clear that THC was specifically inhibiting the fast component of relaxation to acetylcholine, which suggests that THC might be inhibiting the EDHF component of the acetylcholine response, as has been shown previously in rabbit mesenteric arteries (Fleming et al., 1999
) and mesenteric arteries (O'Sullivan et al., 2005b
). To confirm this, we performed experiments in the presence of L-NAME to eliminate the nitric oxide contribution to vasorelaxation to acetylcholine and found that the inhibition of vasorelaxation by THC persisted (Fig. 10B). However, when EDHF activity was blocked, there was no longer any difference between the vehicle- and THC-treated vessels. Together, this suggests that THC is capable of inhibiting both the basal and agonist-stimulated production of EDHF in resistance vessels.
Collectively, our data demonstrate that the effects of THC on endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation are clearly dependent on the predominant endothelium-dependent relaxing factor in a given artery. In the aorta, where nitric oxide is the predominant relaxing factor, THC has no effect on agonist-stimulated vasorelaxation. In the superior mesenteric artery, where hydrogen peroxide production contributes to vasorelaxation, THC enhances agonist-stimulated endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. Finally, in resistance mesenteric arteries, where EDHF is the predominant relaxing factor, THC inhibits endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation.
In conclusion, we have now shown further time-dependent vascular action of THC in conduit arteries that are both PPAR
-mediated and -independent, but both seem to involve increases in SOD activity, leading to increased H2O2 production. Importantly, in some vessels, this leads to THC causing an augmentation of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. By contrast, in resistance vessels, THC inhibits both basal and stimulated EDHF activity. These data highlight the heterogeneous effects of THC in different arterial types.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: THC,
9-tetrahydrocannabinol; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; GW9662, 2-chloro-5-nitro-N-phenylbenzamide; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; SOD, superoxide dismutase; DETCA, diethyldithiocarbamate; EDHF, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor; ChTX, charybdotoxin; Veh, vehicle.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Saoirse E. O'Sullivan, School of Biomedical Sciences, E Floor, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. E-mail: saoirse.o'sullivan{at}nottingham.ac.uk
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bishop-Bailey D (2000) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the cardiovascular system. Br J Pharmacol 129: 823834.[CrossRef][Medline]
Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauca M, and Wahli W (1996) Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-
, -
, and -
in the adult rat. Endocrinology 137: 354366.[Abstract]
Cunnane SE, Chan YY, and Randall MD (2004) Rosiglitazone-induced vasorelaxation in the rat aorta. Proceedings of the British Pharmacological Society at http://www.pa2online.org/Vol2Issue2abst096P.html.
Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Pertwee RG, Stevenson LA, Griffin G, Gibson D, Mandelbaum A, Etinger A, and Mechoulam R (1992) Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science (Wash DC) 258: 19461949.
Ellis EF, Moore SF, and Willoughby KA (1995) Anandamide and delta 9-THC dilation of cerebral arterioles is blocked by indomethacin. Am J Physiol 269: H1859H1864.[Medline]
Ferre P (2004) The biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: relationship with lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes 53: S43S50.
Fleming I, Schermer B, Popp R, and Busse R (1999) Inhibition of the production of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor by cannabinoid receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 126: 949960.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fu J, Gaetani S, Oveisi F, Lo Verme J, Serrano A, Rodriguez De Fonseca F, Rosengarth A, Luecke H, Di Giacomo B, Tarzia G, et al. (2003) Oleylethanolamide regulates feeding and body weight through activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-alpha. Nature (Lond) 425: 9093.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hatoum OA, Binion DG, Miura H, Telford G, Otterson MF, and Gutterman DD (2005) Role of hydrogen peroxide in ACh-induced dilation of human submucosal intestinal microvessels. Am J Physiol 288: H48H54.
Hsueh WA and Bruemmer D (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma: implications for cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 43: 297305.
Hwang J, Kleinhenz DJ, Lassegue B, Griendling KK, Dikalov S, and Hart CM (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands regulate endothelial membrane superoxide production. Am J Physiol 288: C899C905.[CrossRef]
Iesaki T, Okada T, Yamaguchi H, and Ochi R (1994) Inhibition of vasoactive amine induced contractions of vascular smooth muscle by hydrogen peroxide in rabbit aorta. Cardiovasc Res 28: 963968.[Medline]
Kanie N, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi T, and Kamata K (2003) Relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma) and endothelium-dependent relaxation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Br J Pharmacol 140: 2332.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kozak KR, Crews BC, Morrow JD, Wang LH, Ma YH, Weinander R, Jakobsson PJ, and Marnett LJ (2002) 15-Lipoxygenase metabolism of 2-arachidonylglycerol. Generation of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist. J Biol Chem 277: 2327823286.
Leesnitzer LM, Parks DJ, Bledsoe RK, Cobb JE, Collins JL, Consler TG, Davis RG, Hull-Ryde EA, Lenhard JM, Patel L, et al. (2002) Functional consequences of cysteine modification in the ligand binding sites of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors by GW9662. Biochemistry 41: 66406650.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu J, Li H, Burstein SH, Zurier RB, and Chen JD (2003) Activation and binding of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by synthetic cannabinoid ajulemic acid. Mol Pharmacol 63: 983992.
Lo Verme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, and Piomelli D (2005) The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha mediates the anti-inflammatory actions of palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol 67: 1519.
Majithiya JB, Paramar AN, and Balaraman R (2005) Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, restores endothelial function in aorta of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Res 66: 150161.
Matoba T, Shimokawa H, Nakashima M, Hirakawa Y, Mukai Y, Hirano K, Kanaide H, and Takeshita A (2000) Hydrogen peroxide is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in mice. J Clin Investig 106: 15211530.[Medline]
Mulvany MJ and Halpern W (1977) Contractile properties of small arterial resistance vessels in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. Circ Res 41: 1926.
O'Sullivan SE, Kendall DA, and Randall MD (2005a) Novel time-dependent vascular actions of
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR
). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337: 824831.[Medline]
O'Sullivan SE, Kendall DA, and Randall MD (2005b) The vascular effects of
9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its interactions with the endocannabinoid anandamide. Br J Pharmacol 145: 514526.[CrossRef][Medline]
Paisley K and Martin W (1996) Blockade of nitrergic transmission by hydroquinone, hydroxocobalamin and carboxy-PTIO in bovine retractor penis: role of superoxide anion. Br J Pharmacol 117: 16331638.[Medline]
Randall MD, O'Sullivan SE, and Kendall DA (2004) The complexities of the cardiovascular actions of cannabinoids. Br J Pharmacol 142: 2026.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rangwala SM and Lazar MA (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in diabetes and metabolism. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25: 331336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ryan MJ, Didion SP, Mathur S, Faraci FM, and Sigmund CD (2004) PPAR(gamma) agonist rosiglitazone improves vascular function and lowers blood pressure in hypertensive transgenic mice. Hypertension 43: 661666.
Tep-areenan P, Kendall DA, and Randall MD (2003) Mechanisms of vasorelaxation to testosterone in the rat aorta. Eur J Pharmacol 465: 125132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yang Z, Zhang A, Altura BT, and Altura BM (1999) Hydrogen peroxide-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation of rat aorta involvement of Ca2+ and other cellular metabolites. Gen Pharmacol 33: 325336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zygmunt PM, Andersson DA, and Hogestatt ED (2002) delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinol activate capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves via a CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor-independent mechanism. J Neurosci 22: 47204727.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. C Villar, A. J Hobbs, and A. Ahluwalia Sex differences in vascular function: implication of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 447 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. O'Sullivan, M. D. Randall, and S. M. Gardiner The in Vitro and in Vivo Cardiovascular Effects of {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Rats Made Hypertensive by Chronic Inhibition of Nitric-Oxide Synthase J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 663 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||