![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CARDIOVASCULAR
Department of Pharmacology, CV Therapeutics, Palo Alto, California (A.K.D., M.-Y.W., W.-Q.W., L.B.); and Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (I.B.)
Received September 8, 2005; accepted October 13, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-blocker, attenuated the increase in HR but had no effect on the hypotension caused by regadenoson. In the presence of hexamethonium (10 mg/kg), a ganglionic blocker, the tachycardia was completely prevented even though MAP was further reduced. Regadenoson treatment (10 µg/kg) significantly (p < 0.05) increased plasma norepinephrine levels almost 2-fold above baseline. The dissociation of HR and MAP effects by dose, time, and pharmacological interventions provides evidence that tachycardia caused by regadenoson is independent of the decrease in MAP and may not entirely be baroreflex-mediated, suggesting that regadenoson may cause a direct stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system via activation of A2A adenosine receptors.
A2A adenosine receptor agonists cause vasodilation in most vascular beds by a direct action on A2A receptors on endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells (Belardinelli et al., 1998
; Hein et al., 1999
). The peripheral vasodilation causes a decrease in arterial pressure, which in turn elicits a baroreflex-mediated activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and thereby an increase in heart rate. This has been proposed to be the mechanism underlying the increase in heart rate (HR) caused by adenosine and A2A receptor agonists (Nekooeian and Tabrizchi, 1996
; Alberti et al., 1997
). However, it has been shown that adenosine elicits a direct positive chronotropic effect (Koos et al., 1993
) and that activation of A2A receptors leads to direct stimulation of the autonomic nervous system (Koos and Chau, 1998
). In this regard, adenosine has also been shown to cause stimulation of carotid body chemoreceptors (McQueen and Ribeiro, 1981
; Biaggioni et al., 1987
). The adenosine receptor subtype responsible for chemoreceptor activation by adenosine and stable analogs has been proposed to be the A2 receptor (McQueen and Ribeiro, 1986
).
To further establish the role of A2A receptors and the mechanism of the tachycardia caused by adenosine and A2A receptor agonists, we used regadenoson (also known as CVT-3146), a novel A2A adenosine receptor agonist (Gao et al., 2001
). Regadenoson has been shown to be selective for the A2A adenosine receptors versus the A1, A2B, and A3 receptor subtypes in radioligand binding and functional studies (Gao et al., 2001
). This A2A receptor agonist is currently being developed as a pharmacological "stress" agent (coronary vasodilator) for myocardial perfusion imaging using radionuclides (Hendel et al., 2005
). Clinical data show that rapid i.v. injections of regadenoson cause a transient (2-5 min) nearmaximal increase in coronary blood flow velocity, which is accompanied by a sinus tachycardia of approximately 20 ± 2 beats per minute (bpm) (Kerensky et al., 2002
). A pharmacokinetic study of regadenoson in healthy volunteers revealed that regadenoson causes a dose (concentration)-dependent sinus tachycardia with minimal or no changes in systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure (Cannon et al., 2003
). This finding is similar to the observations reported in laboratory animals with adenosine (Koos et al., 1993
) and more recently in humans using another selective A2A receptor agonist, binodenoson (Barrett et al., 2005
). Altogether, these observations suggest that the A2A adenosine receptor-mediated sinus tachycardia may not entirely be due to a baroreceptor reflex triggered by a decrease in arterial pressure. Thus, the present study was undertaken to determine whether regadenoson-induced tachycardia is solely baroreflex-mediated or also due to a direct activation of the SNS.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300 ± 50 gm with two indwelling cannulas (carotid artery and jugular vein) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA). Animals were maintained on a 12-h light and dark cycle and received standard laboratory rat chow and water ad libitum. All experimental procedures were performed under the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (CV Therapeutics, Inc.) and in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Research Council.
Experimental Protocol. All experiments were carried out in unrestrained awake rats. On the day of the experiment (at least 1 week after the intravascular cannulation), the animal was weighed and placed in a small cage to acclimatize to the environment for at least 1 h prior to the commencement of the experiment. Food was withheld during the experiment, but water was given ad libitum. Baseline measurements were recorded for at least 30 min before starting treatment. Rats were given intravenous injections of regadenoson up to 2 doses each of 0.3, 1.0, 3, 10, 30, and 50 µg/kg at 30-min intervals or longer (at the higher doses) to ensure that the parameters being measured returned to baseline levels before the next dose was given. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was given as an i.v. bolus at 0.1-, 3-, and 10-µg/kg doses. In experiments with ZM 241385 (A2A adenosine receptor antagonist), metoprolol (
1-adrenoceptor antagonist), or hexamethonium (ganglionic blocker), these agents were given as an i.v. bolus to the rats 10 min prior to regadenoson. The doses used for these agents were derived from the literature (Poucher et al., 1996
) and/or were tested by giving repeated injections of the blocking agents to determine the dose that ensured complete blockade of the response consistent with the action of each agent (data not shown). All test compounds were injected via the jugular vein catheter.
Measurement of Cardiovascular Responses. All measurements were done in unrestrained awake animals. Heart rate and arterial pressure were monitored continuously throughout the experiment. The arterial catheter was connected to a pressure transducer (MLT0698; ADInstruments, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO) and transducer signal conditioner (model 13-6615-50; Gould Instrument Systems, Inc., Valley View, OH) to monitor arterial pressure. Arterial pressure (diastolic and systolic) and HR were recorded using a Gould PONEMAH system (Gould Instrument Systems, Inc.). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated (in mm Hg) 2/3 diastolic + 1/3 systolic blood pressure.
Measurement of Norepinephrine Levels. A separate group of animals was used for measurement of norepinephrine levels. Animals were weighed and placed in metabolic cages with both the arterial and venous catheters attached to infusion sets (needles 21-gauge, volume 0.17 ml; Terumo Medical Corp., Somerset, NJ). Regadenoson was injected into the venous site, and blood samples were drawn from the arterial site. Blood was withdrawn using a 1-ml syringe with 25-gauge needle and placed in a plasma separator tube (on ice) containing EDTA (Microtainer brand). The samples were centrifuged at 8000 rpm (4°C) for 5 min, and plasma were stored in a microtube (on ice) containing a 10-µl aliquot of EDTA-glutathione (Sigma) preservative. Plasma samples were then transferred to -80°C until analyzed. Plasma norepinephrine concentrations were determined by HPLC using the electrochemical detection method as described in detail elsewhere (Boudreau et al., 1993
).
Data Analysis. Data are presented as percent change ± S.E.M. from baseline. Baseline values are presented under Results and/or figure legends. Statistical comparisons among various treatment groups were carried out using two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. Differences between two groups were determined by Student's t test. Differences among mean values were considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10%, p < 0.001), at a dose as low as 1 µg/kg. At higher doses, the increases in HR were in the range of 15 to 30% above basal (p < 0.001). As to the time course of the changes in HR caused by regadenoson, the increases in HR, independent of the doses, were evident at as early as 1 min after the i.v. bolus. At lower doses (1 µg/kg) of regadenoson, the HR returned to baseline within 2.5 min, whereas at higher doses, not only did the tachycardia last longer (15-30 min) but the magnitude of the effect was also greater (Fig. 1A).
|
20% decrease at 50 µg/kg), which was noted as early as 1 min after the injection. MAP returned to baseline within 5 min at lower doses (<10 µg/kg) of regadenoson, whereas at higher doses (30 and 50 µg/kg), MAP remained slightly below baseline up to 30 min postinjection. A similar pattern was observed in the effect of regadenoson on systolic and diastolic pressure (data not shown).
|
Summarized in Fig. 1C are the maximal changes (% control) in MAP and HR caused by various doses of regadenoson. There was no significant change in MAP at lower doses (0.3-3 µg/kg). A significant decrease in MAP was observed only at 10 µg/kg and at higher doses. However, increases in HR were observed at doses of 1 and 3 µg/kg when there were no appreciable decreases in MAP. The maximal increase in HR was achieved at the 3-µg/kg dose of regadenoson, whereas the maximal decrease in MAP was observed at the highest regadenoson dose studied (50 µg/kg). It is important to note that the maximal increase in HR was observed at the 3-µg/kg dose of regadenoson, at which there was very small decrease in MAP. Thereafter, no further increase in HR was observed with increasing doses of regadenoson, even though the peak response in MAP continued to grow.
Temporal Relationship between Changes in Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Pressure. Figure 2 shows the time course of changes in HR and MAP caused by three different doses (0.3, 3, and 50 µg/kg) of regadenoson. At the 0.3 µg/kg dose (Fig. 2A), there was a small but significant (p < 0.05) increase (11 ± 2%) in HR at 1 min, whereas there was no significant change in MAP. HR returned to baseline values within 10 min of the regadenoson injection. At 3 µg/kg dose (Fig. 2B), there was greater than 20% increase in HR above baseline (p < 0.01), whereas there was no appreciable decrease in MAP. At this dose, HR returned to baseline values within 15 min after regadenoson injection. At the 50 µg/kg dose (Fig. 2C), there was a significant decrease (18 ± 2%, p < 0.01) in MAP; however, the maximal HR response was not very different from the 3-µg/kg dose. At the 50-µg/kg dose of regadenoson, HR remained elevated for 30 min, even though the MAP returned to near normal levels within 5 min.
Pharmacological Interventions. To determine whether the A2A receptor subtype was responsible for mediating the tachycardia and hypotension caused by regadenoson, the animals were pretreated 10 min prior to administration of regadenoson with ZM 241385 (Fig. 3, ZM), an A2A receptor antagonist. ZM itself had no significant effect on HR or MAP. Regadenoson (3 µg/kg) caused a 16 ± 1% (p < 0.01) increase in HR and a 5 ± 3% decrease in MAP. Pretreatment with ZM completely prevented the decrease in MAP and significantly (p < 0.01) attenuated the increase in HR (to 6 ± 1% above baseline) caused by regadenoson.
|
-blocker metoprolol (MET) at a dose of 1 mg/kg (Fig. 4). Treatment with MET caused a small decrease (5% below baseline) in HR but had no effect on MAP. Regadenoson (3 µg/kg) caused a 16 ± 1% (p < 0.01) increase in HR, which was significantly blunted after pretreatment with MET (-1 ± 3%) (Fig. 4). MET treatment had no effect on the hypotension caused by regadenoson (Fig. 4B).
|
|
Comparison with Sodium Nitroprusside. The effects of regadenoson on HR and MAP were compared with those of the vasodilator SNP. SNP is a nonselective vasodilator that causes hypotension mediated by nitric oxide that results in baroreflex-mediated increases in HR. SNP caused a dose-dependent decrease in MAP, which was accompanied by a proportional increase in HR (Fig. 6A). Similar to SNP, regadenoson decreased MAP in a dose-dependent manner, but unlike SNP, the associated increase in HR was not proportional to the magnitude of decrease in MAP (Fig. 6B). This is further illustrated in Fig. 6C, which shows the relationship between changes in HR and MAP by SNP and regadenoson.
|
Effect of Regadenoson on Plasma Norepinephrine Levels. Regadenoson given as an i.v. bolus at a dose of 10 µg/kg caused a significant (p < 0.05) increase in norepinephrine (NE) plasma levels (Fig. 7). The baseline NE levels were 146 ± 11 pg/ml, which increased to a maximum of 269 ± 22 pg/ml. The peak increase in NE concentration effect was observed between 1 and 5 min after the injection of regadenoson, and NE levels returned to baseline by 60 min postinjection of regadenoson.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A2A Receptor-Mediated Responses. The effects of regadenoson on MAP and HR described in the present study are consistent with those reported previously using known selective A2A agonists (Webb et al., 1990
; Koos et al., 1993
; Mathot et al., 1995
; Nekooeian and Tabrizchi, 1996
; Alberti et al., 1997
; Schindler et al., 2005
). Hence, the decrease in MAP and tachycardia are commonly observed pharmacological effects of A2A agonists. The sinus tachycardia and lowering of MAP caused by regadenoson were completely prevented by pretreatment with a selective A2A receptor antagonist ZM 241385, confirming that these effects of regadenoson are mediated by the A2A adenosine receptor subtype. Thus, the results of the present study support previous evidence for the role of A2A receptors in mediating adenosine-induced hypotension and tachycardia (Webb et al., 1991
; Koos et al., 1993
; Bonizzoni et al., 1995
; Nekooeian and Tabrizchi, 1996
; Schindler et al., 2005
).
Role of Sympathetic Stimulation in Regadenoson-Induced Tachycardia. Pretreatment with metoprolol completely abolished the HR response without any change in the effect of regadenoson on MAP, indicating that the tachycardia caused by regadenoson is mediated by an increase in sympathetic tone. Likewise, pretreatment with hexamethonium caused a greater fall in MAP by regadenoson, but the increase in HR caused was completely prevented. This finding also suggests that activation of the SNS plays a major role in the tachycardia induced by regadenoson. Furthermore, regadenoson caused almost an 2-fold increase in circulating plasma norepinephrine levels, which is indicative of sympathoexcitation. Previously, it has been shown that NECA, a nonselective agonist of adenosine receptors, caused increase in plasma norepinephrine levels (Laborit et al., 1990
). Likewise, adenosine has been shown to increase plasma catecholamine levels in sheep (Koos et al., 1993
), an effect that was suggested to be mediated by A2A receptors. However, these data do not discriminate between direct and indirect activation of the SNS.
Regadenoson-Induced Tachycardia Is Independent of Decrease in MAP. Comparison of the dose-response and time course of the effects of regadenoson on HR and MAP revealed that regadenoson can increase HR independent of decreasing MAP. In support of this conclusion, the 0.3- and 3.0-µg/kg doses of regadenoson significantly increased HR but caused no decrease in MAP. At the higher doses of regadenoson (30 and 50 µg/kg) that cause significant hypotension, MAP returned to baseline, whereas marked tachycardia was still present. The tachycardia outlasted the lowering of MAP by at least 20 to 30 min. These data indicate that a baroreflex-mediated increase in HR may not be the sole mechanism for the tachycardia observed with regadenoson. In fact, this lack of association between changes in HR and MAP has been previously reported for other A2A agonists (Lappe et al., 1992
; Koos and Chau, 1998
; Schindler et al., 2005
). In fetal sheep, CGS 21680 caused a significant increase in HR (61%) without an effect on MAP (Koos and Chau, 1998
). Lappe et al. (1992
) reported that systemic administration of the A2A agonist DMPA ([N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2 methylphenyl)ethyl]adenosine) caused sinus tachycardia without a significant change in MAP in awake rats. A recent study shows that peripheral administration of CGS 21680 resulted in both hypotension and tachycardia, whereas central administration (lateral ventricle) caused tachycardia without causing hypotension, suggesting that the hypotensive effect of this A2A agonist is mediated by peripheral receptors, whereas the tachycardia is mediated by centrally located A2A receptors (Schindler et al., 2005
). Altogether, these observations suggest that the tachycardia caused by A2A agonists is not solely the result of a reflex response caused by their hypotensive effect. Although the tachycardia and hypotension caused by regadenoson are mediated by the same receptor subtype (A2A), differences in receptor reserve (and coupling efficiency) for these two effects could be responsible for the differential sensitivity and duration of the effect. However, this remains to be investigated.
A comparison between cardiovascular responses of regadenoson with that of a pure vasodilator SNP provides additional evidence that tachycardia caused by regadenoson is not simply caused by reflex. SNP is a direct vasodilator that causes relaxation of vascular smooth muscle by nitric oxide and cGMP formation (Ignarro and Kadowitz, 1985
). SNP caused a dose-dependent decrease in MAP, which was accompanied by a proportional increase in HR caused by baroreflex-mediated mechanism to keep arterial pressure from falling. However, the decrease in MAP caused by regadenoson was associated with a much greater response in HR and, compared with SNP, seems to be disproportionate to the magnitude of decrease in MAP. This is more evident in Fig. 6B where changes in HR are plotted against changes in MAP for both agents. A linear relationship was seen between MAP and HR changes caused by SNP but not for regadenoson, indicating a lack of dependence of the increase in HR on MAP changes caused by regadenoson. This analysis provides evidence that the increase in HR caused by regadenoson may not be solely be due to its vasodilatory effects, as is the case for the pure vasodilator SNP.
Mechanism of Sympathetic Stimulation. The mechanism of direct sympathoexcitation caused by A2A agonists remains to be established. Adenosine reportedly activates a variety of afferent nerve terminals (myocardial, renal, and skeletal muscle), leading to sympathetic activation (Katholi et al., 1984
; Cox et al., 1989
; Costa et al., 2001
). In humans, activation of arterial chemoreceptors is particularly prominent during intravenous administration of adenosine, which can lead to increase in ventilation, sympathetic activation with a modest increase in systolic pressure, and increase in HR (Biaggioni et al., 1987
, 1991
; Engelstein et al., 1994
). The receptor subtype that mediates adenosine-mediated activation of arterial chemoreceptors is suggested to be A2A (McQueen and Ribeiro, 1983
, 1986
; Koos et al., 1993
). In contrast, adenosine-induced tachycardia in fetal sheep mediated by A2A receptors was proposed to be attributed to direct activation of the SNS independent of the peripheral arterial chemoreceptors (Koos et al., 1993
). Thus, further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of A2A receptor-mediated sympathoexcitation.
In conclusion, the results from the present study show that regadenoson causes dose- and time-dependent decreases in MAP and tachycardia in awake rats mediated by A2A adenosine receptors. The dissociation of the effects of regadenoson on HR and MAP by dose, time course, pharmacological interventions, and in comparison with SNP provides evidence that tachycardia observed with regadenoson in this study could not be explained simply by a baroreflex-mediated phenomenon because of the vasodilatory effects of regadenoson. Therefore, we propose that tachycardia was due, in part, to a direct stimulation of arterial chemoreceptors, as suggested by previous studies (McQueen and Ribeiro, 1986
; Biaggioni et al., 1987
; Engelstein et al., 1994
). A limitation of the study is that we have not conclusively proven our hypothesis by directly measuring afferent sympathetic nerve traffic arising from arterial chemoreceptors or studied the effects of regadenoson in chemodenervated animals.
A potential clinical implication of the findings of the present study is that sympathoexcitation caused by A2A agonists should contribute to the diagnostic value of these agents for coronary artery disease in myocardial perfusion imaging studies, because they not only increase coronary vasodilation but also increase heart rate to mimic exercise, a physiological stressor.
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: regadenoson/CVT-3146, adenosine, 2-[4-(methylamino)carbonyl]-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]; ZM 241385, 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)-[1,2,4]-triazolo-[2,3-a]-[1,3,5]-triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol; CGS 21680, 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine; NECA, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine; SNS, sympathetic nervous system; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MET, metoprolol; HEX, hexamethonium; ANOVA, analysis of variance; NE, norepinephrine.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Arvinder K. Dhalla, CV Therapeutics, 1651 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail: arvinder.dhalla{at}cvt.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alberti C, Monopoli A, Casati C, Forlani A, Sala C, Nador B, Ongini E, and Morganti A (1997) Mechanism and pressor relevance of the short-term cardiovascular and renin excitatory actions of the selective A2A adenosine receptor agonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 30: 320-324.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barrett RJ, Lamson MJ, Johnson J, and Smith WB (2005) Pharmacokinetics and safety of binodenoson after intravenous dose escalation in healthy volunteers. J Nucl Cardiol 12: 166-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
Belardinelli L, Linden J, and Berne RM (1989) The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 32: 73-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
Belardinelli L, Shryock JC, Snowdy S, Zhang Y, Monopoli A, Lozza G, Ongini E, Olsson RA, and Dennis DM (1998) The A2A adenosine receptor mediates coronary vasodilation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 284: 1066-1073.
Biaggioni I, Killian TJ, Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson RM, and Robertson D (1991) Adenosine increases sympathetic nerve traffic in humans. Circulation 83: 1668-1675.
Biaggioni I, Olafsson B, Robertson RM, Hollister AS, and Robertson D (1987) Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of adenosine in conscious man. Evidence for chemoreceptor activation. Circ Res 61: 779-786.
Bonizzoni E, Milani S, Ongini E, Casati C, and Monopoli A (1995) Modeling hemodynamic profiles by telemetry in the rat: a study with A1 and A2a adenosine agonists. Hypertension 25: 564-569.
Boudreau G, Peronnet F, De Champlain J, and Nadeau R (1993) Presynaptic effects of epinephrine on norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerves in dogs. Am J Physiol 265: H205-H211.[Medline]
Cannon RO, Freestone S, Mair SJ, Skettino SL, Belardinelli L, Blackburn BK, and Wolff AA (2003) A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover, ascending dose tolerance and pharmacokinetic study of CVT-3146: a novel agent for potential use in myocardial perfusion imaging (Abstract). Clin Pharmacol Ther 73: 31.[CrossRef][Medline]
Costa F, Diedrich A, Johnson B, Sulur P, Farley G, and Biaggioni I (2001) Adenosine, a metabolic trigger of the exercise pressor reflex in humans. Hypertension 37: 917-922.
Cox DA, Vita JA, Treasure CB, Fish RD, Selwyn AP, and Ganz P (1989) Reflex increase in blood pressure during the intracoronary administration of adenosine in man. J Clin Investig 84: 592-596.[Medline]
Dhalla AK, Shryock JC, Shreeniwas R, and Belardinelli L (2003) Pharmacology and therapeutic applications of A1 adenosine receptor ligands. Curr Top Med Chem 3: 369-385.[CrossRef][Medline]
Engelstein ED, Lerman BB, Somers VK, and Rea RF (1994) Role of arterial chemoreceptors in mediating the effects of endogenous adenosine on sympathetic nerve activity. Circulation 90: 2919-2926.
Fredholm BB, IJzerman AP, Jacobson KA, Klotz KN, and Linden J (2001) International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 53: 527-552.
Gao Z, Li Z, Baker SP, Lasley RD, Meyer S, Elzein E, Palle V, Zablocki JA, Blackburn B, and Belardinelli L (2001) Novel short-acting A2A adenosine receptor agonists for coronary vasodilation: inverse relationship between affinity and duration of action of A2A agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 209-218.
Hein TW, Belardinelli L, and Kuo L (1999) Adenosine A2A receptors mediate coronary microvascular dilation to adenosine: role of nitric oxide and ATP-sensitive potassium channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 291: 655-664.
Hendel RC, Bateman TM, Cerqueira MD, Iskandrian AS, Leppo JA, Blackburn BK, and Mahmarian JJ (2005) Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol, in press.
Ignarro LJ and Kadowitz PJ (1985) The pharmacological and physiological role of cyclic GMP in vascular smooth muscle relaxation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 25: 171-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Iskandrian AS, Verani MS, and Heo J (1994) Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses and results in detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 1: 94-111.[Medline]
Johnston DL, Daley JR, Hodge DO, Hopfenspirger MR, and Gibbons RJ (1995) Hemodynamic responses and adverse effects associated with adenosine and dipyridamole pharmacologic stress testing: a comparison in 2,000 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 70: 331-336.[Abstract]
Katholi RE, Whitlow PL, Hageman GR, and Woods WT (1984) Intrarenal adenosine produces hypertension by activating the SNS via the renal nerves in the dog. J Hypertens 2: 349-359.[Medline]
Kerensky RA, von Mering GO, Kent KM, Cannon RO, and Belardinelli L (2002) Dose dependent increase in human coronary blood flow velocity following an IV bolus of CVT-3146, a novel A2A adenosine receptor agonist: a potential agent for the use in pharmacological stress testing for myocardial perfusion imaging (abstract). Circulation 106 (Suppl II): 618.
Koos BJ and Chau A (1998) Fetal cardiovascular and breathing responses to an adenosine A2a receptor agonist in sheep. Am J Physiol 274: R152-R159.[Medline]
Koos BJ, Mason BA, and Ducsay CA (1993) Cardiovascular responses to adenosine in fetal sheep: autonomic blockade. Am J Physiol 264: H526-H532.[Medline]
Laborit H, Manzo-Fay G, Baron C, and Hasni H (1990) Changes in plasma catecholamine levels after the intraperitoneal and intracerebroventricular administration of adenosine analogues and of clonidine in conscious rats. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 68: 307-327.[Medline]
Lappe RW, Sheldon JH, and Cox BF (1992) Selective adenosine-2 agonist produces both direct and reflex tachycardia in normotensive rats. J Cardiovasc Pharm 19: 460-463.[Medline]
Mathot RA, Cleton A, Soudijn W, IJzerman AP, and Danhof M (1995) Pharmacokinetic modelling of the haemodynamic effects of the A2a adenosine receptor agonist CGS 21680C in conscious normotensive rats. Br J Pharmacol 114: 761-768.[Medline]
McQueen DS and Ribeiro JA (1981) Effect of adenosine on carotid chemoreceptor activity in the cat. Br J Pharmacol 74: 129-136.[Medline]
McQueen DS and Ribeiro JA (1983) On the specificity and type of receptor involved in carotid body chemoreceptor activation by adenosine in the cat. Br J Pharmacol 80: 347-354.[Medline]
McQueen DS and Ribeiro JA (1986) Pharmacological characterization of the receptor involved in chemoexcitation induced by adenosine. Br J Pharmacol 88: 615-620.[Medline]
Nekooeian AA and Tabrizchi R (1996) Effects of adenosine A2A receptor agonist, CGS 21680, on blood pressure, cardiac index and arterial conductance in anaesthetized rats. Eur J Pharmacol 307: 163-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
Poucher SM, Keddie JR, Brooks R, Shaw GR, and McKillop D (1996) Pharmacodynamics of ZM 241385, a potent A2a adenosine receptor antagonist, after enteric administration in rat, cat and dog. J Pharm Pharmacol 48: 601-606.[Medline]
Schindler CW, Karcz-Kubicha M, Thorndike EB, Muller CE, Tella SR, Ferre S, and Goldberg SR (2005) Role of central and peripheral adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular responses to intraperitoneal injections of adenosine A1 and A2A subtype receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 144: 642-650.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trochu JN, Zhao G, Post H, Xu X, Belardinelli L, Belloni FL, and Hintze TH (2003) Selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist as a coronary vasodilator in conscious dogs: potential for use in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 41: 132-139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Udelson JE, Heller GV, Wackers FJ, Chai A, Hinchman D, Coleman PS, Dilsizian V, DiCarli M, Hachamovitch R, Johnson JR, et al. (2004) Randomized, controlled dose-ranging study of the selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist binodenoson for pharmacological stress as an adjunct to myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 109: 457-464.
Verani MS (1991) Pharmacological stress with adenosine for myocardial perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 21: 266-272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Webb RL, Barclay BW, and Graybill SC (1991) Cardiovascular effects of adenosine A2 agonists in the conscious spontaneously hypertensive rat: a comparative study of three structurally distinct ligands. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259: 1203-1212.
Webb RL, McNeal RB, Barclay BW, and Yasay GD (1990) Hemodynamic effects of adenosine agonists in the conscious spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254: 1090-1099.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Cerqueira, P. Nguyen, P. Staehr, S. R. Underwood, A. E. Iskandrian, and on behalf of the ADVANCE-MPI Trial Investigators Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 307 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gordi, B. Blackburn, and H. Lieu Regadenoson Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability in Subjects With Impaired Renal Function J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2007; 47(7): 825 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||