![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Departments of Pharmacology (R.R.M., J.T.D., J.J.R.) and Neurology (B.B., J.A.B.), and Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics (J.A.B., M.A.T.), Detroit, Michigan; Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Programs in Molecular Biology and Human Genetics (R.R.M., J.M.K., J.E.N., M.A.T.) and in Proteases (J.J.R.), Detroit, Michigan; and Wayne State University, Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P.M., J.J.R.) and Environmental Health Sciences Center for Molecular & Cellular Toxicology with Human Applications (R.R.M., J.A.B., M.A.T., J.J.R.), Detroit, Michigan
Received June 22, 2005; accepted October 19, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The NF1 tumor-suppressor gene product neurofibromin is a large protein that includes a domain with GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity toward Ras proto-oncogene products (DeClue et al., 1991
). Therefore, a loss of neurofibromin expression would be expected to increase Ras activation; this has been demonstrated in cells derived from NF1 patients (Basu et al., 1992
; DeClue et al., 1992
) and from transgenic mice that are deficient in neurofibromin (Kim et al., 1995
). Farnesyltransferase inhibitor(s) (FTI) block the post-translational modification of Ras that is required for its function. They were developed with the initial expectation that they would provide a therapeutic approach to the approximately one-quarter of human tumors that have mutationally active oncogenic Ras (Adjei, 2001
). They have also been proposed as potential therapeutics for tumors, such as those from NF1 patients, that may be driven by an overactive proto-oncogenic Ras (Yan et al., 1995
; Parada, 2000
; Costa et al., 2002
).
There are four human Ras proteins that are expressed from three genes (H-, K-, and N-Ras; K-Ras is alternatively spliced). There may be important functional differences between the Ras isoforms. N-Ras, for example, has been ascribed a particular role in cell survival in fibroblasts (Wolfman and Wolfman, 2000
). The farnesyltransferase inhibitors were developed from biochemical experiments on H-Ras proteins, and it is likely that K-Ras (and perhaps also N-Ras) proteins can be alternatively modified by geranylgeranylation when farnesyltransferase activity is blocked (Adjei, 2001
).
Another approach to therapeutically target an overactive Ras pathway is to block critical signal transduction cascades that are initiated by activated Ras. Ras stimulation of the Raf-MAP kinase kinase (MEK)-MAP kinase (ERK) pathway is often required for cell proliferation. Inhibitors of MEK have been used to block the growth of some tumors (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
). In NF1, this pathway has been shown to be important for proliferation of neurofibromin-deficient myeloid (Donovan et al., 2002
) and astrocytoma (Lau et al., 2000
) cells. To date, three agents have been used for the pharmacological inhibition of MEK. PD98059 and U0126 both potently inhibit MEK1 in a variety of cell types when used in the low micromolar concentration range (Dudley et al., 1995
; Favata et al., 1998
; Reiners et al., 1998
). A third inhibitor termed PD184352 (also called CI-1040) potently inhibits MEK1,2 activities in the high nanomolar range (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
). PD184352 has sufficient bioavailability for in vivo studies (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
) and has entered clinical trials (Allen et al., 2003
).
In this study, we tested the efficacy of the three MEK inhibitors, PD98059, U0126, and PD184352, in three cell lines derived from human malignant schwannomas: ST88-14 and NF90-8 from NF1 patients (DeClue et al., 1992
) and STS-26T from a sporadic tumor in a non-NF1 patient (Dahlberg et al., 1993
). The goal was to determine whether MEK inhibition may be a viable approach to suppress the proliferation of schwannomas and whether there may be any increased dependence on the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade in NF1-derived tumors. The results confirm that Ras and ERK1,2 are constitutively activated in the neurofibromin-deficient cells and further show that it is the N-Ras and K-Ras isoforms that are affected. To variable degrees, all three MEK inhibitors suppressed cell proliferation and induced G1 arrest. Only PD184352 potently induced apoptosis and blocked anchorage-independent growth. This cytotoxic effect occurred in both the NF1 and non-NF1 schwannoma cell lines and also in primary rat Schwann cells. This latter effect on normal cells may limit the usefulness of PD184352 in the treatment of NF1.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anchorage-Independent Growth. ST88-14 and STS-26T cells were plated at 1 x 104 cells/ml in media with 15% fetal bovine serum and 0.35% agarose and grown for 14 days. Colonies were measured with a microscope fitted with a calibrated eyepiece, and colonies
60 µm were counted as positive. Values for percent growth were calculated as the number of positive colonies/number of cells plated x 100.
Flow Cytometry. Schwannoma cell lines were harvested and processed for FACS analyses of DNA content as described previously (Reiners et al., 1999
). DNA analyses were made with a FACScalibur instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Percentages of cells in the G0/G1, S, and G2/M stages of the cell cycle were determined with a DNA histogram-fitting program (MODFIT; Verity Software, Topsham, ME). When possible, a minimum of 104 events/sample was collected for subsequent analyses.
DEVDase Assay. The procedures used for the preparation of lysates and the assay of DEVDase using Ac-DEVD-AMC as the substrate have been described in detail (Caruso et al., 2004
). Changes in fluorescence over time were converted into picomoles of product by comparison with a standard curve made with AMC. DEVDase specific activities are reported as nanomolar product per minute per milligram of protein. The bicinchoninic acid assay, using bovine serum albumin as a standard, was used to estimate protein concentrations.
Western Blot Analyses. The procedures used for the preparation of lysates and the Western blot analyses of caspase-3 have been described in detail (Caruso et al., 2004
). Whole-cell lysates were prepared for Western blotting of diphosphorylated ERK1,2 with a 1:2000 dilution of mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-ERK1,2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and then stripped and reprobed for total ERK1,2 content with a 1:1000 dilution of a rabbit anti-ERK1,2 antibody (UBI, Charlottesville, VA). The procedures for the assay of phosphorylated and then total ERK5 and for phosphorylated 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (p90RSK) and total p90RSK were similar, except that the antibodies used were a 1:325 dilution of rabbit anti-ERK5 (phosphothreonine-218/phosphotyrosine-220), 1:500 dilution of rabbit anti-ERK5, 1:1000 rabbit anti-p90RSK (phosphothreonine-359/phosphoserine-363), and 1:1000 dilution of rabbit anti-p90RSK (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Cell lysates were probed for Ras-GAP p120 as described previously (Mattingly et al., 1994
) for neurofibromin with a 1:1000 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal antibody against the C-terminal region of human neurofibromin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and for
-tubulin with a 1:1000 dilution of the E7 monoclonal antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA). Cell lysates were prepared for measurement of total and active/GTP-bound Ras, using an affinity-pulldown reaction with beads precoated with a glutathione S-transferase fusion of the Ras-binding domain of Raf (Taylor and Shalloway, 1996
). Total Ras was detected with 1:250 anti-pan-Ras (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY). Whole-cell lysates of COS cells were prepared for Western blotting 48 h post-transfection. Transfected epitope-tagged Ras proteins were detected with 1:5000 of the 9e10 anti-Myc monoclonal (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Isoform-specific blotting of Ras proteins was performed with monoclonal antibodies. H-Ras was detected with a 1:100 dilution of sc-29 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). K-Ras was detected with a combination of 1:100 sc-30 (Santa Cruz) plus 1:200 K-Ras Ab1 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). N-Ras was detected with 1:200 sc-31 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) plus 1:100 N-Ras Ab1 (Calbiochem). Immune complexes were visualized by appropriate secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescent detection and recorded on X-ray film.
Quantification of Gene Expression by Q-RT-PCR. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen). Q-RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR detection kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and run on the ABI 5700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). All methods for reactions and quantification were performed according to recommendations from the manufacturer, which can be found in the ABI User Bulletin #2 (Applied Biosystems). Gylceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control for quantification. The primer pair for N-Ras was 5'-AGGGTTGTATGGGATTGCCA-3' (forward) and 5'-TCAGGACCAGGGTGTCAGTG-3' (reverse). The primer pair for H-Ras was 5'-TGTGCACAGACTGTCTTGAACATC-3' (forward) and 5'-TGATCCCATCTGTGCCCG-3' (reverse). The primer pair for K-Ras was 5'-AAGAGACCAAGGTTGCAAGGC-3' (forward) and 5'-TGACAACACTGGATGACCGTG-3' (reverse). The target sequence for all Ras isoforms was located either wholly or partially in the noncoding sequence at the carboxy end of the mRNA transcript. The primer pair for GAPDH was 5'-ATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAGG-3' (forward) and 5'-TGTCGCTGTTGAAGTCAGAGG-3' (reverse).
Drugs and Other Reagents. PD98059, PD184352, and U0126 were purchased from Calbiochem. PD184352 (CI-1040) was also generously supplied by Pfizer, Inc (New York, NY). Control experiments demonstrated that the potency and efficacy of PD184352 from the two sources were identical. The MEK inhibitors were prepared as stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide and stored as frozen single-use aliquots at -80°C. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) was purchased from Invitrogen.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulin were similar in all three cell lines. To investigate the activation status of Ras, we performed affinity-pulldown reactions with the Ras-binding domain of Raf. This assay has the advantage over an alternative protocol that involves radiolabeling of nucleotide pools with inorganic phosphate (Mattingly et al., 1994
|
Because there are three Ras genes, we next addressed which Ras isoforms may contribute to the constitutive Ras activation that occurs in the NF1 cell lines. We first established conditions under which we could selectively and semi-quantitatively detect the individual Ras isoforms by Western blotting. We expressed Myc-tagged versions of H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras in COS-7 cells and then used the cell lysates to standardize the antibodies (Fig. 2A, upper panels). Blotting for the epitope tag verified the loading of the transfected Ras proteins and that the isoform-directed antibodies only detected the specific isoform intended. We then repeated the total and active Ras assays in the schwannoma cell lines with isoform-specific detection (Fig. 2A, lower panels). The pattern of expression of the isoforms was identical in all three lines, suggesting that this may be determined by cell lineage. N-Ras was easily detectable with short exposures, indicating that it is likely to be the predominant isoform in these cells. K-Ras was also detected but typically required longer exposure times. We could not detect endogenous H-Ras protein under these conditions or even when up to 150 µg of cell lysate protein per well was analyzed (data not shown). Both activated N-Ras and activated K-Ras were present in the NF1 lines. No activated Ras isoforms could be detected in the STS-26T cells under these conditions. To further investigate the expression of the individual Ras isoforms in the neurofibrosarcoma cell lines, Q-RT-PCR was performed (Fig. 2B). The results showed that the mRNA for N-Ras was the most abundant followed by the mRNA for H-Ras and then that for K-Ras. PCR amplification of genomic DNA followed by DNA sequence analysis demonstrated that there were no mutations in any of the exons of the Ras isoforms in any of these cell lines.
|
Inhibition of ERK MAP Kinase Activation by MEK Inhibitors. To test the hypothesis that the increased amounts of phosphorylated ERK1,2 in the NF1 lines were due to Ras stimulation of the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade, we examined the abilities of three MEK inhibitors to block the activation of ERK1,2 in the malignant schwannoma cell lines. To ensure that the data on MEK inhibitor effects on ERK1,2 phosphorylation were collected under the same experimental conditions as used for cell-cycle analyses, subsequent experiments on ERK activation were performed on cells grown for at least 24 h in the presence of 1% serum. The MEK inhibitors were tested for their effects on basal ERK1,2 phosphorylation and for their ability to block EGF-stimulated ERK1,2 activation (Fig. 3). All of the MEK inhibitors reduced basal ERK1,2 phosphorylation, with U0126 and PD184352 being fully effective at 1 µM. PD98059 was less potent. In dose-response analysis against EGF-stimulated ERK1,2 phosphorylation, PD184352 was fully inhibitory at 1 µM, whereas U0126 required 10 µM for full inhibition, and PD98059 was only partially effective even at 20 µM. Equivalent data were also obtained for the effects of the inhibitors against ERK1,2 phosphorylation in cells stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (data not shown).
|
Inhibition of p90RSK Phosphorylation by MEK Inhibitors. To establish whether the effects of the MEK inhibitors to block ERK1,2 activation produced inhibition of downstream signaling, we assayed the phosphorylation state of p90RSK at residues threonine 359/serine 363 (Frodin and Gammeltoft, 1999
). One hour of treatment with PD184352 at 1 µM or U0126 at 10 µM could fully inhibit both the basal level of p90RSK phosphorylation and the increase that was induced by EGF stimulation (Fig. 4). After 48 h of treatment with PD184352 at 1 µM or U0126 at 10 µM, the ability of EGF to stimulate an increase in p90RSK phosphorylation was also greatly reduced, indicating that inhibition of signal transduction through the MEK/ERK1,2 axis could be maintained.
|
|
PD184352 at 0.1 µM partially suppressed ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 3A) and the proliferations of all three schwannoma cell lines (Fig. 5, C, I, and O). Increasing the concentration to 1 µM, which totally suppressed ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 3A), almost totally suppressed the proliferations of all three cell lines (Fig. 5, C, I, and O). These effects were paralleled by marginal toxicity in the STS-26T cell line (Fig. 5R) and strong toxicities in the ST88-14 and NF90-8 cell lines. A higher concentration of PD184352 (10 µM) was very cytotoxic to all three lines.
Flow-cytometric analyses of the DNA contents of ST88-14 cells (Fig. 6A) and STS-26T cells (Fig. 6C) indicated that concentrations of PD184352 sufficient to suppress proliferation perturbed cell-cycle progression. Specifically, concentrations
1 µM induced the accumulation of G1-phase cells and the loss of S-phase cells (Fig. 6, A and C). In addition, in both cell types, a population of cells with sub-G0/G1 DNA contents appeared within 24 h of treatment with 10 µM PD184352 (Fig. 6, A and C) and accumulated upon further exposure. The antiproliferative effects of 10 µM U0126 and 20 µM PD98059 on ST88-14 (Fig. 6B) and STS-26T (Fig. 6D) cultures also reflected the loss of S-phase cells and an accumulation of G0/G1-phase cells. Neither of these MEK inhibitors induced the appearance/accumulation of populations having sub-G0/G1 DNA contents in either cell line (data not presented). Flow-cytometric analyses of DNA contents were also performed on the NF90-8 cell line following exposure to PD184352. In agreement with the trypan blue exclusion data presented in Fig. 5L, exposure to
1 µM induced a rapid and extensive accumulation of cells having sub-G0/G1 DNA contents (data not presented).
|
|
Effects of MEK Inhibitors on Anchorage-Independent Growth. Formation of colonies during growth in soft agar culture is a condition that is thought to model malignant cell proliferation. ST88-14 and STS-26T cells formed robust colonies under anchorage-independent conditions and thus could be evaluated for the effects of the MEK inhibitors on this activity (Table 1). Line NF90-8 did not form colonies in soft agar in our test protocol. The results showed that PD184352 effectively suppressed anchorage-independent growth of both malignant schwannoma cell lines when used in the high nanomolar concentration range. The other two MEK inhibitors, PD98059 and U0126, were markedly less potent in this assay.
|
Lack of Effect of MEK Inhibitors on ERK5 Phosphorylation. Because PD184352 potently induced apoptosis and blocked anchorage-independent growth, whereas PD98059 and U0126 did not, we addressed whether this difference could reflect differential abilities to inhibit ERK5 activation (Fig. 8). U0126 and PD98059 have been reported to block ERK5 phosphorylation in COS cells transfected with an epitope-tagged ERK5 construct (Kamakura et al., 1999
), unlike PD184352 (Squires et al., 2002
). Our studies showed that basal levels of ERK5 phosphorylation were undetectable in the two NF1 cell lines and very low in STS-26T cells. Note that our analyses were performed under the same culture conditions where PD184352 produced a strong growth inhibitory and proapoptotic response (Figs. 5, 6, 7). In other cell types, ERK5 phosphorylation has been shown to be strongly induced by treatment with EGF (Kato et al., 1998
; Mody et al., 2001
). EGF was found to strongly stimulate ERK5 phosphorylation in all of the malignant schwannoma cell lines (Fig. 8). None of the three MEK inhibitors when used at the concentrations at which they were effective inhibitors of ERK1,2 phosphorylation significantly inhibited EGF-stimulated ERK5 activation.
|
Proapoptotic Effect of PD184352 in Primary Rat Schwann Cells. PD184352 potently induced apoptosis in human malignant schwannoma cell lines. We therefore tested whether PD184352 was cytotoxic to primary Schwann cells to determine whether the proapoptotic effect was specific to the transformed phenotype. Primary rat Schwann cells were isolated from the sciatic nerve and treated with the MEK inhibitors. Morphological analysis (Fig. 9) demonstrated that neither PD98059 nor U0126 at concentrations up to 20 µM had much effect on primary Schwann cells. Assays of cell viability confirmed that 99% of the Schwann cells were viable under control incubations and that at least 96% of the cells remained viable after 72 h of treatment with PD98059 or U0126. Treatment with 10 µM or 20 µM PD184352, however, induced a profound morphological change in the Schwann cell cultures (Fig. 8) that indicated cytotoxicity. In agreement with the morphological assessment, PD184352 at 20 µM reduced cell viability to 38% within 48 h of treatment.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, a rational therapy for NF1 may be to inhibit Ras signaling. A direct approach to inhibit Ras would be to block its required post-translational processing, e.g., by inhibition of farnesyltransferase. In preclinical studies, for example, FTI have been shown to block proliferation of a human neurofibrosarcoma cell line (Yan et al., 1995
) and of Schwann cells derived from a neurofibromin-deficient mouse (Kim et al., 1997
). FTI administration also reversed learning deficits in the heterozygous NF1+/- mouse (Costa et al., 2002
). There is a currently accruing phase 2 clinical trial of an FTI for progressing plexiform neurofibromas in NF1 (protocol 01-C-0222). It has previously been noted that FTI treatment is not very effective at inhibiting proliferation of hematopoietic cells from neurofibromin-deficient mice, which the authors attributed to the lack of ability of the FTI to inhibit the processing of K- and N-Ras (Mahgoub et al., 1999
). Functional connections between neurofibromin deficiency and N-Ras activation have also previously been made in astrocytes (Bajenaru et al., 2001
). Our data show that three human malignant schwannoma cell lines all predominantly express N-Ras and K-Ras and that those isoforms are activated in the neurofibromin-deficient lines. The absence of detectable H-Ras activation in these neurofibrosarcoma cell lines could suggest that FTI may not be particularly effective against these tumors, although it is possible that the actual therapeutic target of FTI may be another farnesylated protein, such as RhoB (Mattingly et al., 2002
). It is also significant that Q-RT-PCR demonstrates that, although the mRNA for N-Ras is the most abundant as we would expect from the Western blotting results, the mRNA for H-Ras is present at similar or greater levels than that for K-Ras. Thus, our inability to detect H-Ras by Western blotting could have several explanations. On the one hand, the level of H-Ras protein may indeed be very low, which would suggest that there is strong control of H-Ras expression at the translational or degradation levels. On the other hand and despite our attempts to standardize the detection of the Ras isoforms by Western blotting using recombinant standards, it may be that the H-Ras isoform-selective antibody is insufficiently sensitive.
Ras controls cell proliferation and survival through its activation of downstream signaling cascades. Ras-GTP is a potent activator of the Raf/MEK1,2/ERK1,2 MAP kinase cascade. Our data confirm that Ras is constitutively activated in neurofibromin-deficient schwannoma cells and that this Ras activation is accompanied by a constitutive increase in ERK1,2 phosphorylation. Therefore, it is reasonable to investigate whether small molecules that can prevent ERK1,2 activation may be useful in NF1.
The most promising pharmacological target within the Raf/MEK/ERK cascade has been MEK (Allen et al., 2003
). Three compounds have been described as selective inhibitors of MEK. The first of these was PD98059, which inhibits MEK1 at low µM concentrations (Dudley et al., 1995
). This compound has been extensively used in in vitro studies, including the demonstration that 50 µM PD98059 can block the increased proliferation of astrocytes that are haploinsufficient for neurofibromin (Gutmann et al., 1999
). A second effective MEK inhibitor is U0126, which inhibits MEK1,2 in the high nanomolar range in tissue culture studies (Favata et al., 1998
). A third MEK inhibitor is PD184352 (CI-1040), which is both more potent and has sufficient bioavailability that it can be used in mice (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
) and the clinic (Allen et al., 2003
). To differing degrees, the MEK inhibitors suppressed the proliferations of the three schwannoma cell lines and reduced their cellular phosphorylated ERK1,2 contents. The rank order for MEK potency and efficacy for these two activities was PD184352 > U0126 > PD98059. The antiproliferative activities of the three MEK inhibitors were only seen at concentrations that reduced phosphorylated ERK1,2 contents. However, in the cases of PD98059 and U0126, ERK1,2 inhibition did not equate with antiproliferative effects. For example, whereas exposure to 1 µM U0126 or 10 µM PD98059 eliminated ERK1,2 activities in all three cell lines grown in 1% serum (Fig. 3), those concentrations of U0126 had no effect on proliferation and PD98059 was only weakly cytostatic (Fig. 5). Higher concentrations of U0126 were cytotoxic. In contrast, the antiproliferative and ERK1,2 inhibitory activities of PD184352 correlated with one another. In addition, PD184352 differed from the other MEK inhibitors in its ability to induce apoptosis. Although U0126 was cytotoxic to all three cell lines, the death that occurred did not have the characteristics of apoptosis. Either PD184352 induces a proapoptotic effect that is unique to itself or PD184352 lacks an activity that is induced by PD98059 and U0126, which suppress the initiation/development of apoptosis. Interestingly, PD184352 was without any notable proapoptotic effect on SKNSH human neuroblastoma cells or MCF10A human breast epithelial cells (data not shown). Thus, the cytotoxic effect of PD184352 is probably dependent on one or more aspects of the Schwann cell lineage, although a less likely possibility is that it could depend on a property of primary cells that is retained by the schwannoma cells but not the other two cell lines. One relevant property of Schwann cells may be that they are sensitive to cytokine-induced apoptosis (Skoff et al., 1998
). Therefore, it will be interesting to explore whether the cytotoxic effect of PD184352 may be related to the cytotoxic program normally induced by cytokines. If so, such a finding could imply that schwannomas may also retain some susceptibility to cytokine-induced apoptosis.
One potential distinction in the actions of the MEK inhibitors could be in their abilities to inhibit MEK5, which is responsible for ERK5 phosphorylation. Both PD98059 and U0126 have been reported to be effective inhibitors of MEK5 (Kamakura et al., 1999
; Karihaloo et al., 2001
), as opposed to PD184352 (Squires et al., 2002
). However, our data suggest that this distinction is unlikely to explain the differential induction of apoptosis in malignant schwannomas following treatment with MEK inhibitors. We could not detect ERK5 phosphorylation in the NF1 lines under the growth conditions in which the cytostatic/proapoptotic effects were defined. Since ERK5 does not seem to be significantly activated in the relevant growth environment, inhibition of this pathway is unlikely to explain the effects of the drugs. Nevertheless, it is possible that there is a particular fraction of ERK5 that is activated and critical for a prosurvival outcome but that it is not adequately detected during assays of total cellular ERK5 phosphorylation. Therefore, it is significant that pretreatment with the MEK inhibitors at concentrations sufficient to inhibit EGF stimulation of ERK1,2 phosphorylation had no effect on EGF-stimulated ERK5 phosphorylation. Our data agree somewhat with the study by Mody et al. (2001
), who compared the effects of the three MEK inhibitors against both ERK1,2 and ERK5 phosphorylation in HeLa cells. Their data show that higher concentrations of PD98059, U0126, and PD184352 are required to inhibit ERK5 phosphorylation than to inhibit ERK1,2 phosphorylation. In that study, which was performed by adding drugs to cells that had been starved for serum overnight prior to treatment, PD98059 inhibited ERK5 phosphorylation only partially with a 100 µM pretreatment, whereas U0126 and PD184352 partially inhibited ERK5 phosphorylation at 10 µM. Our experiments were performed in cells in the presence of 1% fetal calf serum to ensure that data were collected under the same experimental conditions used to investigate effects on cell proliferation and viability. Under these conditions, we found that, although PD184352 was less potent as a MEK inhibitor than it was under serum-free conditions (data not shown), it was still highly effective. Both PD184352 at 1 µM and U0126 at 10 µM were able to suppress signaling to p90RSK activation through the MEK/ERK1,2 pathway for at least 48 h despite their lack of effect on ERK5 phosphorylation. Thus, it is unlikely that effects on ERK5 activation explain the differential effects of the MEK inhibitors on malignant schwannomas.
A rational therapy for NF1 will presumably target the underlying molecular defect that drives the aberrant proliferation of neuroectodermal cells. Therefore, it is noteworthy that the effects of all the MEK inhibitors were largely indistinguishable between the NF1 cell lines and the control malignant schwannoma from a non-NF patient. The control cell line maintained neurofibromin expression and low levels of Ras and ERK1,2 activation and yet was equally sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of the MEK inhibitors. The MEK inhibitors were expected to be most effective against tumors, such as those with oncogenic Ras, that had constitutively high levels of ERK MAP kinase activaton (Sebolt-Leopold et al., 1999
). However, this does not seem to be a decisive determinant of response because some tumors with high ERK phosphorylation are resistant to the effects of MEK inhibitors, whereas other malignancies with low constitutive ERK phosphorylation may be sensitive (Allen et al., 2003
). Our data with the malignant schwannoma cell lines suggest that PD184352 may provide an effective therapy for this tumor type, whether it is NF1-derived or sporadic, although the proapoptotic effect of PD184352 in primary rat Schwann cells indicates that its effects on the peripheral nervous system should be carefully assessed.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: NF1, type 1 neurofibromatosis; AMC, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; EGF, epidermal growth factor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor(s); GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GAPDH, gylceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAP kinase kinase or ERK kinase; p90RSK, 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase; Q-RT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; PD98059, 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflavone; U0126, 1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(2-aminophenylthio)butadiene; PD184352 (CI-1040), 2-(2-chloro-4-iodo-phenylamino)-N-cyclopropylmethoxy-3,4-difluoro-benzamide.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Raymond R. Mattingly, Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University, 540 East Canfield Ave., Detroit, MI 48201. E-mail: r.mattingly{at}wayne.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adjei AA (2001) Blocking oncogenic Ras signaling for cancer therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1062-1074.
Allen LF, Sebolt-Leopold J, and Meyer MB (2003) CI-1040 (PD184352), a targeted signal transduction inhibitor of MEK (MAPKK). Semin Oncol 30: 105-116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bajenaru ML, Donahoe J, Corral T, Reilly KM, Brophy S, Pellicer A, and Gutmann DH (2001) Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) heterozygosity results in a cell-autonomous growth advantage for astrocytes. Glia 33: 314-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
Basu TN, Gutmann DH, Fletcher JA, Glover TW, Collins FS, and Downward J (1992) Aberrant regulation of ras proteins in malignant tumour cells from type 1 neurofibromatosis patients. Nature (Lond) 356: 713-715.[CrossRef][Medline]
Caruso JA, Mathieu PA, Joiakim A, Leeson B, Kessel D, Sloane BF, and Reiners JJ Jr (2004) Differential susceptibilities of murine hepatoma 1c1c7 and Tao cells to the lysosomal photosensitizer NPe6: influence of aryl hydrocarbon receptor on lysosomal fragility and protease contents. Mol Pharmacol 65: 1016-1028.
Cichowski K, Shih TS, Schmitt E, Santiago S, Reilly K, McLaughlin ME, Bronson RT, and Jacks T (1999) Mouse models of tumor development in neurofibromatosis type 1. Science (Wash DC) 286: 2172-2176.
Costa RM, Federov NB, Kogan JH, Murphy GG, Stern J, Ohno M, Kucherlapati R, Jacks T, and Silva AJ (2002) Mechanism for the learning deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Nature (Lond) 415: 526-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dahlberg WK, Little JB, Fletcher JA, Suit HD, and Okunieff P (1993) Radiosensitivity in vitro of human soft tissue sarcoma cell lines and skin fibroblasts derived from the same patients. Int J Radiat Biol 63: 191-198.[Medline]
DeClue JE, Cohen BD, and Lowy DR (1991) Identification and characterization of the neurofibromatosis type 1 protein product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 9914-9918.
DeClue JE, Papageorge AG, Fletcher JA, Diehl SR, Ratner N, Vass WC, and Lowy DR (1992) Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis. Cell 69: 265-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
Donovan S, See W, Bonifas J, Stokoe D, and Shannon KM (2002) Hyperactivation of protein kinase B and ERK have discrete effects on survival, proliferation and cytokine expression in Nf1-deficient myeloid cells. Cancer Cell 2: 507-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dudley DT, Pang L, Decker SJ, Bridges AJ, and Saltiel AR (1995) A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 7686-7689.
Favata MF, Horiuchi KY, Manos EJ, Daulerio AJ, Stradley DA, Feeser WS, Van Dyk DE, Pitts WJ, Earl RA, Hobbs F, et al. (1998) Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J Biol Chem 273: 18623-18632.
Frodin M and Gammeltoft S (1999) Role and regulation of 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) in signal transduction. Mol Cell Endocrinol 151: 65-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gutmann DH, Loehr A, Zhang Y, Kim J, Henkemeyer M, and Cashen A (1999) Haploinsufficiency for the neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) tumor suppressor results in increased astrocyte proliferation. Oncogene 18: 4450-4459.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamakura S, Moriguchi T, and Nishida E (1999) Activation of the protein kinase ERK5/BMK1 by receptor tyrosine kinases. Identification and characterization of a signaling pathway to the nucleus. J Biol Chem 274: 26563-26571.
Karihaloo A, O'Rourke DA, Nickel C, Spokes K, and Cantley LG (2001) Differential MAPK pathways utilized for HGF- and EGF-dependent renal epithelial morphogenesis. J Biol Chem 276: 9166-9173.
Kato Y, Tapping RI, Huang S, Watson MH, Ulevitch RJ, and Lee JD (1998) Bmk1/Erk5 is required for cell proliferation induced by epidermal growth factor. Nature (Lond) 395: 713-716.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim HA, Ling B, and Ratner N (1997) Nf1-deficient mouse Schwann cells are angiogenic and invasive and can be induced to hyperproliferate: reversion of some phenotypes by an inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase. Mol Cell Biol 17: 862-872.[Abstract]
Kim HA, Rosenbaum T, Marchionni MA, Ratner N, and DeClue JE (1995) Schwann cells from neurofibromin-deficient mice exhibit activation of p21ras, inhibition of cell proliferation and morphological changes. Oncogene 11: 325-335.[Medline]
Klose A, Ahmadian MR, Schuelke M, Scheffzek K, Hoffmeyer S, Gewies A, Schmitz F, Kaufmann D, Peters H, Wittinghofer A, et al. (1998) Selective disactivation of neurofibromin GAP activity in neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum Mol Genet 7: 1261-1268.
Lau N, Feldkamp MM, Roncari L, Loehr AH, Shannon P, Gutmann DH, and Guha A (2000) Loss of neurofibromin is associated with activation of RAS/MAPK and PI3-K/AKT signaling in a neurofibromatosis 1 astrocytoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59: 759-767.[Medline]
Mahgoub N, Taylor BR, Gratiot M, Kohl NE, Gibbs JB, Jacks T, and Shannon KM (1999) In vitro and in vivo effects of a farnesyltransferase inhibitor on Nf1-deficient hematopoietic cells. Blood 94: 2469-2476.
Mattingly RR, Gibbs RA, Menard RE, and Reiners JJ Jr (2002) Potent suppression of proliferation of a10 vascular smooth muscle cells by combined treatment with lovastatin and 3-allylfarnesol, an inhibitor of protein farnesyltransferase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303: 74-81.
Mattingly RR, Sorisky A, Brann MR, and Macara IG (1994) Muscarinic receptors transform NIH 3T3 cells through a Ras-dependent signalling pathway inhibited by the Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain. Mol Cell Biol 14: 7943-7952.
Menon AG, Anderson KM, Riccardi VM, Chung RY, Whaley JM, Yandell DW, Farmer GE, Freiman RN, Lee JK, Li FP, et al. (1990) Chromosome 17p deletions and p53 gene mutations associated with the formation of malignant neurofibrosarcomas in von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 5435-5439.
Mody N, Leitch J, Armstrong C, Dixon J, and Cohen P (2001) Effects of MAP kinase cascade inhibitors on the MKK5/ERK5 pathway. FEBS Lett 502: 21-24.[CrossRef][Medline]
Packer RJ, Gutmann DH, Rubenstein A, Viskochil D, Zimmerman RA, Vezina G, Small J, and Korf B (2002) Plexiform neurofibromas in NF1: toward biologic-based therapy. Neurology 58: 1461-1470.[Medline]
Parada LF (2000) Neurofibromatosis type 1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1471: M13-M19.[Medline]
Reiners JJ Jr, Clift R, and Mathieu P (1999) Suppression of cell cycle progression by flavonoids: dependence on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Carcinogenesis 20: 1561-1566.
Reiners JJ Jr, Lee JY, Clift RE, Dudley DT, and Myrand SP (1998) PD98059 is an equipotent antagonist of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Mol Pharmacol 53: 438-445.
Sebolt-Leopold JS, Dudley DT, Herrera R, Van Becelaere K, Wiland A, Gowan RC, Tecle H, Barrett SD, Bridges A, Przybranowski S, et al. (1999) Blockade of the MAP kinase pathway suppresses growth of colon tumors in vivo. Nat Med 5: 810-816.[CrossRef][Medline]
Skoff AM, Lisak RP, Bealmear B, and Benjamins JA (1998) TNF-alpha and TGF-beta act synergistically to kill Schwann cells. J Neurosci Res 53: 747-756.[CrossRef][Medline]
Squires MS, Nixon PM, and Cook SJ (2002) Cell-cycle arrest by PD184352 requires inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) 1/2 but not ERK5/BMK1. Biochem J 366: 673-680.[CrossRef][Medline]
Taylor SJ and Shalloway D (1996) Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras. Curr Biol 6: 1621-1627.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vogel KS, Klesse LJ, Velasco-Miguel S, Meyers K, Rushing EJ, and Parada LF (1999) Mouse tumor model for neurofibromatosis type 1. Science (Wash DC) 286: 2176-2179.
Wolfman JC and Wolfman A (2000) Endogenous c-N-Ras provides a steady-state anti-apoptotic signal. J Biol Chem 275: 19315-19323.
Wu GS (2004) The functional interactions between the p53 and MAPK signaling pathways. Cancer Biol Ther 3: 156-161.[Medline]
Yan N, Ricca C, Fletcher J, Glover T, Seizinger BR, and Manne V (1995) Farnesyl-transferase inhibitors block the neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) malignant phenotype. Cancer Res 55: 3569-3575.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. C. Henderson, S.-H. Ahn, and G. L. Clayman Inhibition of the Growth of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Cells by CI-1040 Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2009; 135(4): 347 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Wojtkowiak, F. Fouad, D. T. LaLonde, M. D. Kleinman, R. A. Gibbs, J. J. Reiners Jr., R. F. Borch, and R. R. Mattingly Induction of Apoptosis in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Cell Lines by a Combination of Novel Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors and Lovastatin J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2008; 326(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Johansson, Y. Y. Mahller, M. H. Collins, M.-O. Kim, T. Nobukuni, J. Perentesis, T. P. Cripe, H. A. Lane, S. C. Kozma, G. Thomas, et al. Effective in vivo targeting of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2008; 7(5): 1237 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Barkan, S. Starinsky, E. Friedman, R. Stein, and Y. Kloog The Ras Inhibitor Farnesylthiosalicylic Acid as a Potential Therapy for Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5533 - 5542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang and R. R. Mattingly The Ras-GRF1 Exchange Factor Coordinates Activation of H-Ras and Rac1 to Control Neuronal Morphology Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2006; 17(5): 2177 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||