![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Pharmaceutical Research Center, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan
Received December 7, 2004; accepted March 25, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PGD2 exerts a variety of actions in various tissues and cells via two G protein-coupled receptors, prostaglandin D2 receptor (DP) and chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper type 2 cells (CRHT2) (Boie et al., 1995
; Hirai et al., 2001
). CRTH2 was cloned as a Th2-specific marker by differential display (Nagata et al., 1999
). CRTH2-mediated signals enhance the IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 production by Th2 cells and cause up-regulation of CD11b and CD40L in resting Th2 cells (Tanaka et al., 2004
). CRTH2 is expressed not only on Th2 cells but also on eosinophils and basophils and induces their migration (Hirai et al., 2001
). Gervais et al. (2001
) have demonstrated that PGD2 induces degranulation of eosinophil via CRTH2 stimulation. Since PGD2 has been shown to enhance the release of leukotriene C4 in response to the calcium ionophore A23187
[GenBank]
in eosinophils (Raible et al., 1992
), this phenomenon may be through the activation of CRTH2. These reports have strongly suggested the critical role of PGD2 and CRTH2 in allergic diseases. The pharmacological blockade of PGD2-mediated events at CRTH2 receptors may then reduce the allergic pathogenesis caused by activated Th2 cells, basophils, and eosinophils. However, the importance of CRTH2 in allergic pathogenesis still remains to be clarified. To elucidate the implications of CRTH2 in these pathological conditions, one of the best tools is a selective ligand. Recently, ramatroban (BAY u3405), a thromboxane-type prostanoid (TP) receptor antagonist, has been revealed to be a CRTH2 antagonist (Sugimoto et al., 2003
), and indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, has been identified as a CRTH2 agonist (Hirai et al., 2002
). The use of these compounds is, however, limited due to the other activities they have in addition to their effects on CRTH2. Therefore, we have explored molecules specific for CRTH2. We now report a small molecule agonist K376 and antagonists K117 and K604, which are selective for CRTH2 and the effects of these compounds on eosinophil migration.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of pAMoh-hCRTH2 Mammalian Expression Vector. The human CRTH2 cDNA was generated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using a human leukocyte total RNA as a template and the following primers: 5'-CCAAGCTTCCACCATGTCGGCCAACGCCACACTG-3' (sense) and 5'-TAGGTACCTAACTCGAGGTGCTGCTCAGC-3' (antisense). The amplified DNA fragment was cloned into pCR-Blunt vector using Zero Blunt polymerase chain reaction cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The nucleotide sequence of cloned cDNA was confirmed to be identical to the reported sequence (GenBank accession no. AY507142
[GenBank]
). The human CRTH2 cDNA was subsequently subcloned into HindIII-Asp718 sites in the mammalian episomal expression vector pAMoh (the hygromycin B resistant-type of pAMo vector; Sasaki et al., 1993
) for generation of a cell line stably expressing human CRTH2.
Cells and Culture. The cell line 293EBNA was purchased from Invitrogen and maintained in culture in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 250 µg/ml G418 (for EBNA selection). Stable expression of human CRTH2 in 293EBNA cells was achieved by transfection of the pAMoh-hCRTH2 plasmid using FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were maintained in culture for 48 h post-transfection and then grown in the presence of 300 µg/ml hygromycin B (Wako Junyaku, Osaka, Japan) for 2 weeks to select for resistant cells expressing the human CRTH2 receptor (293EBNA/hCRTH2).
|
[3H]PGD2 binding to the membrane fraction of 293EBNA/hCRTH2 was measured by a modification of the method described by Wright et al. (1998
). Briefly, the reaction mixture containing an assay buffer, the membrane suspension (20 µg of 293EBNA/hCRTH2), 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 1 nM [3H]PGD2 was incubated for 120 min at 25°C, in a volume of 0.2 ml. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM PGD2. Under these conditions, specific binding (total minus nonspecific) of the radioligand to the receptor reached equilibrium. The binding reactions were terminated by filtration through GF/B filters (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) under reduced pressure using a MT-24 cell harvester (Brandel Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The filters were washed three times with ice-cold assay buffer and placed in scintillation vials, and the bound radioactivity was determined using a liquid scintillation counter (LS6500; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). The concentration-response curves were obtained from assays performed in duplicate at four concentrations of each drug.
Selectivity Panel. The binding assays for 15 receptors and the enzymatic assays for four arachidonic acid-metabolizing enzymes were run by MDS Pharma Services (Bothell, WA). The target runs were adrenergic receptors
1 (nonselective),
2 (nonselective), and
(nonselective); dopamine D1 and D2L receptors; histamine H1 and H2 receptors; muscarinic receptor M1; serotonin receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 (nonselective); leukotriene D4 receptor (Cys-LT1); leukotriene B4 receptor (BLT1); platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptors; thromboxane A2 receptor (TP); DP; cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2; 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO); and thromboxane (TX) synthase. All assays were run using recombinant human receptors and enzymes, except where noted. The full methods and references can be found on the MDS Pharma Services Web site (http://www.mdsps.com/). The assays were run at 1 µM of all test compounds, and the percentage of inhibition is given as the average of two experiments performed in duplicate.
Ca2+ Mobilization Assay. Cells (2 x 106 cells/ml) were preincubated with 3 µM Fura 2/AM and 0.003% Pluronic F-127 (Asahidenka Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan) in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) buffer for 1 h at 37°C. After washing three times with HBSS buffer to remove any extracellular dye, the cells were suspended in HBSS buffer at 2 x 106 cells/ml and kept in the dark at room temperature. The cell suspension was transferred to each cuvette, stirred with a magnetic stirrer, and the fluorescence intensity of Fura 2 was quantified using a CAF-100 Ca2+ analyzer (Japan Spectroscopic, Tokyo, Japan). For measuring the antagonistic activity of compounds, antagonists were added to each cuvette 1.5 min before the addition of PGD2. The ratio of the fluorescence intensities at excitation wave-lengths of 340 and 380 nm was recorded.
Preparation of Human Eosinophils. All donors fully understood and consented to the procedure. Human eosinophils were purified according to the procedure described by Hansel et al. (1991
). In brief, granulocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of nonallergic, normal volunteers by discontinuous Ficoll gradient centrifugation. The granulocytes were then incubated for 30 min at 4°C with magnetic beads coated with anti-CD16 (Miltenyi Biotech Inc., Bergish Gladbach, Germany). Eosinophils and neutrophils were thereafter separated in a steel matrix column. Neutrophils attached to anti-CD16 beads stayed in the column, whereas eosinophils were eluted from the column. The purity of the isolated eosinophils was more than 90%. Eosinophils were washed with 0.2% bovine serum albumin-phosphate-buffered saline and resuspended in a chemotaxis assay buffer at the concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml.
Human Eosinophil Chemotaxis. For the chemotaxis assay, the test compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (chemotaxis assay buffer). The final concentration of DMSO in a test compound solution was 0.1%. PGD2 and BW245c were dissolved in ethanol. DK-PGD2 dissolved in methyl acetate was evaporated with a nitrogen stream and dissolved in the chemotaxis assay buffer before use. Human recombinant eotaxin was dissolved in distilled water. All chemoattractants were diluted with chemotaxis assay buffer before use. The chemotaxis assays were performed using 24-well Transwell plates with 3-µm pore-size polycarbonate filters (Costar, Cambridge, MA), as described previously (Gervais et al., 2001
). The chemoattractants in chemotaxis assay buffer (0.5 ml) were placed in the lower chamber. In the upper chamber, purified eosinophils (1 x 105 cells) were loaded in a volume of 0.1 ml. The Transwells were then incubated for 3 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The migrated cells into the lower chamber were recovered and counted by a flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). For evaluation of agonistic activity on human CRTH2, the test compounds in chemotaxis assay buffer were placed in the lower chamber without any chemoattractants, and the cells were loaded into the upper chamber. For evaluation of antagonistic activity on human CRTH2, the test compounds were placed in the lower chamber with chemoattractants, and the cells incubated with the test compound for 15 min at 37°C were loaded into the upper chamber. For the control wells, chemotaxis assay buffer with 0.1% DMSO was used. As the chemoattractants, 100 nM PGD2 and 10 ng/ml human recombinant eotaxin were used as a CRTH2 agonist and a CCR3 agonist, respectively. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, these compounds showed a significant selectivity for human CRTH2. Even at a concentration of 1 µM, these compounds have little effect on the specific binding of radioligands for
1- and
2-adrenoceptors,
-adrenoceptors, dopamine D1 and D2L receptors, histamine H1 and H2 receptors, muscarinic M1 receptors, serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors, Cys-LT1 receptors, BLT1 receptors, PAF receptors, thromboxane A2 receptors, and prostanoid DP receptors and on the enzymatic activities of arachidonic acid-metabolizing enzymes such as COX-1, COX-2, 5-LO, and TX synthase (Table 1).
|
Effects of K376, K117, and K604 on Ca2+ Mobilization in 293EBNA/hCRTH2 Cells. PGD2 induced Ca2+ mobilization in 293EBNA/hCRTH2 cells at nanomolar concentrations, but it did not in mock-transfected 293EBNA/Vec cells even at 10 µM (data not shown). K376 induced Ca2+ mobilization in 293EBNA/hCRTH2 cells at submicromolar concentrations with around 1 order of magnitude lower potency than that of PGD2 (Fig. 2B); however, K376 induced no significant Ca2+ mobilization in the mock-transfected 293EBNA/Vec cells even at 10 µM (Fig. 2A). Having once responded to PGD2, 293EBNA/hCRTH2 cells did not show any responses to K376 in the Ca2+ mobilization assay and vice versa (data not shown).
On the other hand, although K117 and K604 showed no effect on the Ca2+ mobilization in 293EBNA/hCRTH2 cells, K117 and K604 inhibited the Ca2+ mobilization induced by 3 nM PGD2 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3, A and B, respectively).
|
Agonistic Effect of K376 on Human Eosinophil Chemotaxis. Consistent with the previous observation (Hirai et al., 2001
), human eosinophils exhibited chemotactic responses to either CRTH2 agonist PGD2 or DK-PGD2, but not to DP agonist BW245c (Fig. 4A). Also, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, which has been reported to have an agonistic activity on human CRTH2 (Hirai et al., 2002
), induced a chemotactic activity of human eosinophils (Fig. 4B). K376, a compound showing agonistic activity on human CRTH2 in the Ca2+ mobilization assay, induced the weak human eosinophil chemotaxis at the concentration of 10 µM (Fig. 4C).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To explore the CRTH2 antagonists, we used a PGD2 binding assay with 293EBNA cell membranes expressing human CRTH2. Saturation analysis of [3H]PGD2-specific binding to human CRTH2 revealed the presence of a specific binding site with an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 1.4 nM. This value is 1 order of magnitude lower than the value (31.3 nM) reported previously by Hirai et al. (2001
), in which a whole cell binding assay was performed. This dissociation may reflect the differences in experimental settings such as buffer constitution, incubation time, reaction temperature, and human CRTH2 expression system. It has also been reported that saturation analysis of [3H]PGD2-specific binding to human embryonic kidney 293 (EBNA) cell membranes expressing CRTH2 reveals the presence of high-affinity binding sites with a Kd value of 2.5 nM, although there also exists low-affinity binding sites (Sawyer et al., 2002
).
Using an equilibrium competition binding assay, we have identified 4-aminotetrahydroquinoline derivatives having potent inhibitory activity on human CRTH2. The Ki values of K376, K117, and K604 are 91, 5.5, and 11 nM, respectively. K117 and K604 are more potent than ramatroban because calculated from the reported IC50 value (Sugimoto et al., 2003
), Ki value of ramatroban is 86 nM. The selectivity of our compounds for CRTH2 is demonstrated by the lack of binding to other representative G protein-coupled receptors, including DP receptors (Table 1).
We have further evaluated these compounds by Ca2+ mobilization assay to identify whether these compounds are antagonists. When PGD2 is added, 293EBNA/CRTH2 cells show intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, but the vector-transfected 293EBNA cells do not show any responses to PGD2, even at a concentration of 10 µM. Therefore, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in 293EBNA/CRTH2 induced by PGD2 can be the specific response via CRTH2. This result is consistent with a previous report that revealed that CRTH2 can induce Ca2+ influx (Hirai et al., 2001
). In our assay system, K117 and K604 do not influence the basal Ca2+ level in 293EBNA/CRTH2 cells by themselves, but they do inhibit intracellular Ca2+ mobilization induced by 3 nM PGD2 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3). The concentration of 1 µM is sufficient to completely ablate the response. Therefore, these results suggest that K117 and K604 have an antagonistic activity on human CRTH2 without any agonistic activity. On the other hand, K376 induces intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in a concentration-dependent manner in 293EBNA/CRTH2 cells, even though the potency is weaker than PGD2 and DK-PGD2, CRTH2 full agonists. Since the potency of K376 in inducing eosinophil chemotaxis is also comparatively weak in spite of its potent activity in the binding assay (Figs. 1C and 4C), K376 may be a partial agonist, not a full agonist of human CRTH2. The structures of K376, K117, and K604 are very similar. Therefore, it can be possible to manipulate the structure to convert an agonist to an antagonist and vice versa. However, more information about the structure-activity relationship is required, which we are now investigating.
CRTH2 is expressed on human eosinophils, and once activated by PGD2, a chemotactic response is induced (Hirai et al., 2001
). On the other hand, DP is also expressed on human eosinophils, and DP has been considered to negatively regulate the action of other mediators (Monneret et al., 2002
). According to previous studies, PGD2 induces the chemotactic response of eosinophils in our assay system. DK-PGD2, a metabolite of PGD2 and selective CRTH2 agonist, also induces eosinophil migration, but BW245c, a selective DP agonist, does not. Therefore, it has also been confirmed that eosinophils show a chemotactic response via CRTH2. Since both K117 and K604 inhibit eosinophil migration induced by 100 nM PGD2, but not by eotaxin, an agonist of CCR3 chemokine receptor, these compounds selectively inhibit the response via CRTH2 (Fig. 5, A and B). K117 is a more potent antagonist than K604 because an IC50 value of K117 (7.8 nM) is lower than that of K604 (42.2 nM). This result is consistent with the results from the competitive binding assay and Ca2+ mobilization assay (Figs. 1C and 3). Furthermore, K117 and K604 are more potent compounds than ramatroban because it has been reported that ramatroban has an IC50 value of 170 nM in the eosinophil migration assay in which 1 nM PGD2 is used as a chemoattractant (Sugimoto et al., 2003
).
In allergic responses, there are two phases of reactions. One is the immediate type reaction induced by mast cell-oriented mediators, including histamine and leukotrienes (Naclerio, 1988
). The other is late reaction induced by migrated inflammatory cells, such as eosinophils and lymphocytes especially the Th2 phenotype, several hours after an immediate reaction (Frew and Kay, 1990
). PGD2 is well known as an important mediator of the immediate reaction in addition to histamine and leukotrienes because plenty of PGD2 is immediately released after the antigen-antibody reaction from mast cells (Schleimer et al., 1985
; Murray et al., 1986
). It has also been indicated that PGD2 is continuously released several hours after the immediate reaction (Reddy and Herschman, 1997
). Therefore, PGD2 may work as a mediator in the late allergic reaction through activation of CRTH2 expressed on eosinophils and Th2 cells. To reveal the roles of CRTH2 in the allergic pathology, the evaluation with the CRTH2 antagonists in the animal allergic models is a beneficial approach. K117 and K604, potent and selective CRTH2 antagonists, can be suitable tools in this approach.
In conclusion, we have identified low molecular weight compounds K117 and K604 as selective and potent CRTH2 antagonists. These compounds can be useful tools to explore the CRTH2 functions in allergic diseases in the future.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: PG, prostaglandin; DP, prostaglandin D2 receptor; CRTH2, chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper 2 cells; Th2, T helper 2; IL, interleukin; TP, thromboxane-type prostanoid; K376, (2R*,4S*)-N-(2-methyl-1-propionyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-yl)-N-phenylacetamide; K117, (2R*,4S*)-N-(1-benzoyl-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-yl)-N-phenylisobutyramide; K604, (2R*,4S*)-N-(1-benzoyl-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-yl)-N-phenylcyclopropanecarboxamide; BW245c, (4S)-(3-[(3R,S)-3-cyclohexyl-3-hydroxypropyl]-2,5-dioxo)-4-imidazolidineheptanoic acid; CD, cluster of differentiation; DK-PGD2, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGD2; AM, acetoxymethyl ester; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); LT, leukotriene; PAF, platelet-activating factor; COX, cyclooxygenase; 5-LO, 5-lipoxygenase; TX, thromboxane; SCH23390 R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; SQ29548, [1S-[1
,2
(Z),3
,4
]]-7-[3-[[2-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]hydrazino]methyl]-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl]-5-heptenoic acid; HBSS, Hank's balanced salt solution; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Hideki Mimura, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd., 1188 Shimotogari, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka 411-8731, Japan. E-mail: hideki.mimura{at}kyowa.co.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Boie Y, Sawyer N, Slipetz DM, Metters KM, and Abramovitz M (1995) Molecular cloning and characterization of the human prostanoid DP receptor. J Biol Chem 270: 18910-18916.
Charlesworth EN, Kagey-Sobotka A, Schleimer RP, Norman PS, and Lichtenstein LM (1991) Prednisone inhibits the appearance of inflammatory mediators and the influx of eosinophils and basophils associated with the cutaneous late-phase response to allergen. J Immunol 146: 671-676.[Abstract]
Frew AJ and Kay AB (1990) Eosinophils and T-lymphocytes in late-phase allergic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 85: 533-539.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gervais FG, Cruz RPG, Chateauneuf A, Gale S, Sawyer N, Nantel F, Metters KM, and O'Neill GP (2001) Selective modulation of chemokinesis, degranulation and apoptosis in eosinophils through the PGD2 receptors CRTH2 and DP. J Allergy Clin Immunol 108: 982-988.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hansel TT, De Vries IJM, Iff T, Rihs S, Wandzilak M, Betz S, Blaser K, and Walker C (1991) An improved immunomagnetic procedure for the isolation of highly purified human blood eosinophils. J Immunol Methods 145: 105-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirai H, Tanaka K, Takano S, Ichimasa M, Nakamura M, and Nagata K (2002) Agonistic effect of indomethacin on a prostaglandin D2 receptor, CRTH2. J Immunol 168: 981-985.
Hirai H, Tanaka K, Yoshie O, Ogawa K, Kenmotsu K, Takamori Y, Ichimasa M, Sugamura K, Takano S, and Nagata K (2001) Prostaglandin D2 selectively induces chemotaxis in T helper type 2 cells, eosiniphils and basophils via seven-transmembrane receptor CRTH2. J Exp Med 193: 255-261.
Lewis RA, Soter NA, Diamond PT, Austin KF, Oates JA, and Roberts LJ (1982) Prostaglandin D2 generation after activation of rat and human mast cells with anti-IgE. J Immunol 129: 1627-1631.[Abstract]
Monneret G, Li H, Vasilescu J, Rokach J, and Powell WS (2002) 15-Deoxy-delta 12,14-prostaglandins D2 and J2 are potent activators of human eosinophils. J Immunol 168: 3563-3569.
Murray JJ, Tonnel AB, Brash AR, Roberts LJ 2nd, Gosset P, Workman R, Capron A, and Oates JA (1986) Release of prostaglandin D2 into human airways during acute antigen challenge. N Engl J Med 315: 800-804.[Abstract]
Naclerio RM (1988) The pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis: impact of therapeutic intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol 82: 927-934.[Medline]
Naclerio RM, Meier HL, Kagey-Sobotka A, Norman PS, and Lichtenstein LM (1983) Mediator release after nasal airway challenge with allergen. Am Rev Respir Dis 128: 597-602.[Medline]
Naclerio RM, Proud D, Togias AG, Adkinson NF Jr, Meyers DA, Kagey-Sobotka A, Plaut M, Norman PS, and Lichtenstein LM (1985) Inflammatory mediators in late antigen-induced rhinitis. N Engl J Med 313: 65-70.[Abstract]
Nagata K, Tanaka K, Ogawa K, Kemmotsu K, Imai T, Yoshie O, Abe H, Tada K, Nakamura M, Sugamura K, et al. (1999) Selective expression of a novel surface molecule by human Th2 cells in vivo. J Immunol 162: 1278-1286.
Raible DG, Schulman ES, DiMuzio J, Cardillo R, and Post TJ (1992) Mast cell mediators prostaglandin-D2 and histamine activate human eosinophils. J Immunol 148: 3536-3542.[Abstract]
Reddy ST and Herschman HR (1997) Prostaglandin synthase-1 and prostaglandin synthase-2 are coupled to distinct phospholipases for the generation of prostaglandin D2 in activated mast cells. J Biol Chem 272: 3231-3237.
Sasaki K, Watanabe E, Kawashima K, Sekine S, Dohi T, Oshima M, Hanai N, Nishi T, and Hasegawa M (1993) Expression cloning of a novel Gal
(1-3/1-4)GlcNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase using lectin resistance selection. J Biol Chem 268: 22782-22787.
Sawyer N, Cauchon E, Chateauneuf A, Cruz RPG, Nicholson DW, Metters KM, O'Neill GP, and Gervais FG (2002) Molecular pharmacology of the human prostaglandin D2 receptor, CRTH2. Br J Pharmacol 137: 1163-1172.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schleimer RP, Fox CC, Naclerio RM, Plaut M, Creticos PS, Togias AG, Warner JA, Kagey-Sobotka A, and Lichtenstein LM (1985) Role of human basophils and mast cells in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol 76: 369-374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sugimoto H, Shichijo M, Iino T, Manabe Y, Watanabe A, Shimazaki M, Gantner F, and Bacon KB (2003) An orally bioavailable small molecule antagonist of CRTH2, ramatroban (BAY u3405), inhibits prostaglandin D2-induced eosinophil migration in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305: 347-352.
Tanaka K, Hirai H, Takano S, Nakamura M, and Nagata K (2004) Effects of prostaglandin D2 on helper T cell functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316: 1009-1014.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wright DH, Metters KM, Abramovitz M, and Ford-Hutchinson AW (1998) Characterization of the recombinant human prostanoid DP receptor and identification of L-644,698, a novel selective DP agonist. Br J Pharmacol 123: 1317-1324.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Cossette, S. E. Walsh, S. Kim, G.-J. Lee, J. A. Lawson, S. Bellone, J. Rokach, and W. S. Powell Agonist and Antagonist Effects of 15R-Prostaglandin (PG) D2 and 11-Methylene-PGD2 on Human Eosinophils and Basophils J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 173 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Mathiesen, A. Christopoulos, T. Ulven, J. F. Royer, M. Campillo, A. Heinemann, L. Pardo, and E. Kostenis On the Mechanism of Interaction of Potent Surmountable and Insurmountable Antagonists with the Prostaglandin D2 Receptor CRTH2 Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1441 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||