![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Received January 3, 2005; accepted March 9, 2005.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BKB2 receptors are constitutively expressed in a variety of tissues and mediate most of the in vivo effects of kinins (Bathon and Proud, 1991
). On the other hand, BKB1 receptors are not present in any significant amount in normal tissues, and their expression is often inducible rather than constitutive (Regoli et al., 1978
; Sardi et al., 2000
). Synthesis of BKB1 receptors can be induced during tissue isolation trauma and incubation or under certain pathophysiological conditions conveying tissue injury or inflammation (Marceau et al., 1998
). Among them, a relevant role has been attributed to BKB1 receptor function in different processes, such as endotoxic shock (Pesquero et al., 2000
; deBlois and Horlick, 2001
), bronchial hyper-responsiveness (Huang et al., 1999
), ischemia (Tschope et al., 2004
), ischemia reperfusion (Lagneux et al., 2003
), and postischemic neovascularization (Emanueli et al., 2002
). Taking this into account, the aim of the present work was to evaluate, through functional studies, the possible roles NEP, ACE, and APM might play in the biological inactivation of DAKD in isolated HUA and to validate this vessel as yet another BKB1 receptor model preparation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Usually within 3 h after delivery, the samples were placed onto dissecting dishes containing Krebs' solution, and arteries (internal diameter approximately 1 mm) were carefully dissected free from Wharton's jelly using micro-dissecting instruments and cut into rings of approximately 3-mm width. Whenever necessary, endothelium was removed by gently rubbing the inner side of HUA rings with a roughened steel rod.
Functional Studies. Immediately after dissection, rings were suspended in 5-ml organ baths and stretched with an optimal resting tension of 2 to 4 g (Tufan et al., 2003
). Changes in tension were measured with Grass isometric force transducers (FT-03C; Grass Instruments Co., Quincy, MA) and displayed on Grass model 7D polygraphs. During the incubation period, Krebs' solution was maintained at 37°C and at pH 7.4 by constant bubbling with 95% O2/5% CO2. Bath solution was replaced every 15 min with fresh bubbled buffer. Rings were incubated for 5 h, and then CRCs to DAKD or Sar0-D-Phe8-des-Arg9-BK were obtained by the cumulative addition of agonists in 0.25-log10 increments. Since the majority of isolated smooth muscle preparations become responsive to BKB1 receptor agonists as a function of time, HUA preparations were incubated for 5 h prior to obtaining the CRCs to DAKD or Sar0-D-Phe8-des-Arg9-BK. Antagonist and peptidase inhibitors were applied 30 min before and during the addition of either agonist. Neither antagonist nor peptidase inhibitors produced any significant increase in basal tone of HUA rings when applied.
At the end of each CRC, 10 µM serotonin (5-HT) was applied to determine the tissue maximal contractile response (Altura et al., 1972
), which was 7.96 ± 0.24 g (n = 140). All experiments were performed in parallel with rings from the same umbilical cord. Only one agonist CRC was performed in each ring.
Drugs. The following compounds were used for functional studies: 5-hydroxytryptamine creatine sulfate complex from Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA); des-Arg9-KD and Lys-des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK (des-Arg9-Leu8-KD) from Bachem Biosciences Inc. (King of Prussia, PA); Sar0-D-Phe8-des-Arg9-BK from Phoenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Belmont, CA); amastatin hydrochloride [(2S,3R)-3-amino-2-hydroxy-5-methylhexanoyl-Val-Val-Asp hydrochloride] and captopril (N-[(S)-3-mercapto-2-methylpropionyl]-L-proline) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); phosphoramidon (N-
-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy(hydroxyphosphinyl)-L-leucyl-L-tryptophan) from Peptides International Inc. (Louisville, KY).
Preparation of all stock solutions and their subsequent dilutions were performed in glass bidistilled water. Stock solutions were stored in frozen aliquots and thawed and diluted daily.
Expression of Results and Statistical Analysis. All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. The number of experiments n represents the number of rings from different cords tested. Responses are expressed as the percentage of tissue maximum response elicited by 10 µM 5-HT. The estimates of EC50 values (i.e., the agonists concentration that produces 50% of the maximal response), the maximal response (Emax), and the slope factor (nH) were obtained using ALL-FIT (DeLean et al., 1978
). Briefly, responses obtained for each agonist concentration in each ring tested in the same group were averaged and then fitted to a four-parameter logistic model expressed as
![]() |
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
In addition, a significant leftward shift of DAKD-induced responses was observed by treatment of HUA rings with 10 µM amastatin, a selective APM inhibitor (control: pEC50 7.42 ± 0.09, n = 26; treated: pEC50 8.24 ± 0.17, n = 8, P < 0.05; Fig. 2B; Table 1). Maximum responses produced by DAKD were not significantly modified by treatment of rings with 10 µM amastatin (control: Emax 49.3 ± 7.1%, n = 26; treated: Emax 67.7 ± 14.0%, n = 8, P > 0.05; Fig. 2B; Table 1).
Lack of Potentiation of DAKD-Elicited Responses in HUA by ACE Inhibition. Neither pEC50 nor maximum responses to DAKD were modified by treatment with the selective ACE inhibitor captopril (1 µM) (Fig. 2C and Table 1).
Effects of Triple Peptidase Inhibition on DAKD-Induced Responses in HUA. CRCs to DAKD obtained in the presence of 10 µM phosphoramidon, 10 µM amastatin, and 1 µM captopril yielded a pEC50 value of 8.86 ± 0.09 and a maximum response value of 87.3 ± 2.0% (n = 6; Fig. 3; Table 1). The potency of DAKD-induced responses in the presence of triple peptidase inhibition was significantly increased over CRCs obtained in the presence of 10 µM phosphoramidon and 10 µM amastatin (pEC50 8.13 ± 0.11, n = 8, P < 0.05; Fig. 3; Table 1).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
APM is a transmembrane M1 zinc metallopeptidase. Proud et al. (1987
) have reported that APM is able to cleave the amino terminal Lys- of DAKD and Lys-BK into des-Arg9-BK and BK, respectively. Palmieri et al. (1989
) characterized APM activity in cultured porcine aorta endothelium and smooth muscle cells and suggested that vascular APM may modulate vasoactive peptide levels in vivo, particularly within the microenvironment of endothelial and smooth muscle cell surface receptors. Correspondingly, it has been demonstrated that APM inhibition can potentiate in vitro responses produced by angiotensin III in different isolated vessels (Robertson et al., 1992
; Li et al., 1997
). In addition, in lipopolysaccharide-pretreated rabbits, inhibition of APM by previous treatment with amastatin increased the duration of the hypotension induced by DAKD (Drapeau et al., 1991
). The authors suggested that APM represents an inactivation pathway for the potent natural BKB1 receptor agonist since its metabolite, des-Arg9-BK, is a much less potent BKB1 receptor agonist. The present study, in agreement with these hypotheses, demonstrates that in HUA, inhibition of APM significantly potentiates DAKD-induced contractile responses, suggesting that this enzyme might be another important pathway of kinin inactivation in this tissue. According to available bibliography, there is no previous evidence of potentiation of in vitro contractile responses by DAKD in human isolated vascular tissue induced by APM inhibition.
ACE is a single-chain transmembrane M2 zinc metallopeptidase that converts angiotensin I into angiotensin II by removing the C-terminal dipeptide from the former (Skeggs et al., 1956
). This enzyme has been described in endothelial cells of many origins (Erdos, 1990
), in human heart (Kokkonen et al., 1999
), and in rat aorta smooth muscle (Arnal et al., 1994
). ACE cleaves the C-terminal tripeptide from BKB1 receptor agonists, yielding BK1-5 but at a slower rate and with less affinity than the removal of the C-terminal dipeptide from BK (Marceau et al., 1998
). It has been shown that ACE inhibition potentiates in vitro effects of BK in vascular tissues (Miyamoto et al., 2002
). However, in our model, ACE inhibition by captopril did not modify DAKD-induced contractile responses. Similarly, Babiuk et al. (1982
) failed to observe any potentiation of vasoconstrictor responses elicited by des-Arg9-BK or DAKD in isolated rabbit aorta by ACE inhibition. Nevertheless, in the present study, when ACE, NEP, and APM were simultaneously inhibited, DAKD-induced responses in HUA were potentiated when compared with those obtained in conditions of concurrent APM and NEP inhibition.
Together, the above-mentioned results support our hypothesis that the potentiation of DAKD-induced responses in HUA was due to impairment of its biotransformation in biophase. In addition, the absence of potentiation of responses elicited by Sar-D-Phe8-des-Arg9-BK, a peptidase resistant BKB1 receptor agonist (Drapeau et al., 1993
), by triple enzymatic inhibition substantiates our hypothesis. On the other hand, a direct agonist effect of ACE inhibitors has been proposed by Ignjatovic et al. (2002
), who observed in several cell culture models that enalaprilat produced an agonist-like action, which they considered belonged to stimulation of BKB1 receptors. However, Fortin et al. (2003
) have failed to observe such effects when evaluating responses to captopril, enalaprilat, and zofenoprilat on isolated rabbit aorta and mouse stomach, two BKB1 receptor model preparations. In addition, in the same study enalaprilat produced negligible vasomotor effects on human umbilical vein, yet another extensively characterized BKB1 receptor model. The absence of vasoconstrictor responses observed with captopril in HUA suggests a lack of activity of ACE inhibitors on BKB1 receptors in this tissue.
NEP, APM, and ACE have been characterized in endothelial cells of several species, including human (Erdos, 1990
; Llorens-Cortes et al., 1992
; Walsh et al., 1993
). However, when we evaluated DAKD-elicited contractile responses in HUA, no differences were observed between responses obtained in intact and de-endothelized rings. The lack of potentiation of responses induced by DAKD in HUA rings without endothelium suggests that, in this tissue, the enzymatic activity of NEP, APM, and ACE responsible for biological inactivation of this agonist is not endothelial.
The only work to date that proposed the presence of BKB1 receptors mediating contraction in HUA was carried out in presence of indomethacin, with low oxygen tension in Krebs' media and with unusually low obtained maximum responses (Abbas et al., 1998
). In our study, CRCs to DAKD obtained in the presence of triple enzymatic inhibition yielded a maximum effect approximately 2-fold and a potency approximately 30-fold higher when compared with those obtained in control HUA rings. Taking into account this marked potentiation, we considered that the enzymatic inhibition of BKB1 receptor agonist metabolization was the best condition for a more reliable pharmacological characterization of the receptor population involved in DAKD-elicited responses in HUA. In this condition, a highly selective BKB1 receptor antagonist, Lys-des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK, competitively antagonized DAKD-induced responses, yielding a pKB value of 8.57. This finding is in agreement with previously reported affinities of Lys-des-Arg9-[Leu8]-BK for the human BKB1 receptor (Ki value of 1.3 nM; Menke et al., 1994
). In addition, the obtained Schild slope was not different from unity, consistent with involvement of a single homogeneous receptor population in DAKD-elicited responses (Kenakin, 1992
).
Although evidence from different models suggests that the BKB2 receptor subtype mediates most kinin actions under physiological conditions, the rapid and long-lasting up-regulation of BKB1 receptors after inflammatory insult implies that this receptor may become the dominant subtype in mediating chronic inflammation (Dray and Perkins, 1993
). The relevance of the BKB1 receptor subtype in different pathophysiological conditions has been reported. BKB1 gene deletion prevents endotoxic shock by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mice (Pesquero et al., 2000
) and, in accordance with this report, deBlois and Horlick (2001
) have suggested that hemodynamic and inflammatory phenomena observed after LPS treatment in green monkeys, a nonhuman primate model, are mainly mediated by BKB1 receptor activation. Additionally, associated with other inflammatory stimuli, it has been described that BKB1 receptor mRNA expression is increased in an allergen-induced bronchial hyper-responsiveness model in rats (Huang et al., 1999
). Moreover, allergic lung inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized mice is diminished by systemic treatment with a BKB1 receptor antagonist. The role of BKB1 receptors in ischemic processes has also been studied. Lagneux et al. (2003
) have shown that des-Arg9-BK infusion in an isolated rat heart low-flow ischemia-reperfusion model significantly reduced infarct size. Additionally, Tschope et al. (2004
) have reported that the cardioprotective effects of angiotensin receptor 1 blockade after experimental myocardial infarction, by coronary artery ligation, are partly mediated by secondary activation of the BKB1 receptor pathway. Moreover, Emanueli et al. (2002
) have established a functional role for the BKB1 receptor in postischemic neovascularization by means of a murine model of limb ischemia. According to the authors, BKB1 receptor signaling plays an essential role in reparative angiogenesis by modulating endothelial cell proliferation and survival. In addition, they suggest that potentiation of this mechanism may exert a therapeutic effect by accelerating spontaneous tissue healing. Together, all these data underline the potential relevance of BKB1 receptor-mediated actions in different pathological conditions. Taking into account the present results, the possible potentiation of BKB1 receptor agonist-induced responses by NEP, APM, and/or ACE inhibition in the above-mentioned pathophysiological models could be tested. Data obtained from these future studies, and from the present one, could potentially contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies for these pathologies.
In summary, this work constitutes the first pharmacological evidence that metallopeptidases NEP, APM, and ACE represent a relevant inactivation mechanism of the endogenous BKB1 receptor agonist DAKD in isolated HUA.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: BK, bradykinin; DAKD, Lys-des-Arg9-BK; NEP, neutral endopeptidase; APM, aminopeptidase M; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; HUA, human umbilical artery; CRC, concentration-response curves; 5-HT, serotonin; KD, kallidin.
Address correspondence to: Rodolfo Pedro Rothlin, Paraguay 2155, 9th floor, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1121), Argentina. E-mail: farmaco3{at}fmed.uba.ar
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbas F, Clayton JK, Marshall KM, and Senior J (1998) Characterisation of kinin receptors on the human isolated umbilical artery. J Endocrinol 156: 389-394.[Abstract]
Altura BM, Malaviya D, Reich CF, and Orkin LR (1972) Effects of vasoactive agents on isolated human umbilical arteries and veins. Am J Physiol 222: 345-355.
Arnal JF, Battle T, Rasetti C, Challah M, Costerousse O, Vicaut E, Michel JB, and Alhenc-Gelas F (1994) ACE in three tunicae of rat aorta: Expression in smooth muscle and effect of renovascular hypertension. Am J Physiol 267: H1777-H1784.
Arunlakshana O and Schild HO (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 14: 48-58.[Medline]
Babiuk C, Marceau F, St-Pierre S, and Regoli D (1982) Kininases and vascular responses to kinins. Eur J Pharmacol 78: 167-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bathon JM and Proud D (1991) Bradykinin antagonists. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 31: 129-162.[CrossRef][Medline]
deBlois D and Horlick RA (2001) Endotoxin sensitization to kinin B(1) receptor agonist in a non-human primate model: haemodynamic and pro-inflammatory effects. Br J Pharmacol 132: 327-335.[CrossRef][Medline]
DeLean A, Munson PJ, and Rodbard D (1978) Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay and physiological dose-response curves. Am J Physiol 235: E97-E102.
Drapeau G, Audet R, Levesque L, Godin D, and Marceau F (1993) Development and in vivo evaluation of metabolically resistant antagonists of B1 receptors for kinins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 266: 192-199.
Drapeau G, deBlois D, and Marceau F (1991) Hypotensive effects of Lys-des-Arg9-bradykinin and metabolically protected agonists of B1 receptors for kinins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259: 997-1003.
Dray A and Perkins M (1993) Bradykinin and inflammatory pain. Trends Neurosci 16: 99-104.[CrossRef][Medline]
Emanueli C, Bonaria Salis M, Stacca T, Pintus G, Kirchmair R, Isner JM, Pinna A, Gaspa L, Regoli D, Cayla C, et al. (2002) Targeting kinin B(1) receptor for therapeutic neovascularization. Circulation 105: 360-366.
Erdos EG (1990) Some old and some new ideas on kinin metabolism. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 15 (Suppl 6): S20-S24.
Fortin JP, Gobeil F Jr, Adam A, Regoli D, and Marceau F (2003) Do angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors directly stimulate the kinin B1 receptor? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H277-H282.
Frossard N, Stretton CD, and Barnes PJ (1990) Modulation of bradykinin responses in airway smooth muscle by epithelial enzymes. Agents Actions 31: 204-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gafford JT, Skidgel RA, Erdos EG, and Hersh LB (1983) Human kidney "enkephalinase", a neutral metalloendopeptidase that cleaves active peptides. Biochemistry 22: 3265-3271.[CrossRef][Medline]
González W, Soleilhac JM, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP, and Michel JB (1998) Characterization of neutral endopeptidase in vascular cells, modulation of vasoactive peptide levels. Eur J Pharmacol 345: 323-331.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang TJ, Haddad EB, Fox AJ, Salmon M, Jones C, Burgess G, and Chung KF (1999) Contribution of bradykinin B(1) and B(2) receptors in allergen-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160: 1717-1723.
Ignjatovic T, Tan F, Brovkovych V, Skidgel RA, and Erdos EG (2002) Activation of bradykinin B1 receptor by ACE inhibitors. Int Immunopharmacol 2: 1787-1793.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kenakin TP (1992) Tissue response as a functional discriminator of receptor heterogeneity: effects of mixed receptor populations on Schild regressions. Mol Pharmacol 41: 699-707.[Abstract]
Kerr MA and Kenny AJ (1974) The purification and specificity of a neutral endopeptidase from rabbit kidney brush border. Biochem J 137: 477-488.[Medline]
Kokkonen JO, Kuoppala A, Saarinen J, Lindstedt KA, and Kovanen PT (1999) Kallidin- and bradykinin-degrading pathways in human heart: degradation of kallidin by aminopeptidase M-like activity and bradykinin by neutral endopeptidase. Circulation 99: 1984-1990.
Lagneux C, Adam A, and Lamontagne D (2003) A study of the mediators involved in the protection induced by exogenous kinins in the isolated rat heart. Int Immunopharmacol 3: 1511-1518.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li Q, Feenstra M, Pfaffendorf M, Eijsman L, and van Zwieten PA (1997) Comparative vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II, III and IV in human isolated saphenous vein. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 29: 451-456.[CrossRef][Medline]
Llorens-Cortes C, Huang H, Vicart P, Gasc JM, Paulin D, and Corvol P (1992) Identification and characterization of neutral endopeptidase in endothelial cells from venous or arterial origins. J Biol Chem 267: 14012-14018.
Marceau F, Hess JF, and Bachvarov DR (1998) The B1 receptors for kinins. Pharmacol Rev 50: 357-386.
McEachern AE, Shelton ER, Bhakta S, Obernolte R, Bach C, Zuppan P, Fujisaki J, Aldrich RW, and Jarnagin K (1991) Expression cloning of a rat B2 bradykinin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 7724-7728.
Menke JG, Borkowski JA, Bierilo KK, MacNeil T, Derrick AW, Schneck KA, Ransom RW, Strader CD, Linemeyer DL, and Hess JF (1994) Expression cloning of a human B1 bradykinin receptor. J Biol Chem 269: 21583-21586.
Miyamoto A, Murata S, and Nishio A (2002) Role of ACE and NEP in bradykinin-induced relaxation and contraction response of isolated porcine basilar artery. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 365: 365-370.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palmieri FE, Bausback HH, and Ward PE (1989) Metabolism of vasoactive peptides by vascular endothelium and smooth muscle aminopeptidase M. Biochem Pharmacol 38: 173-180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pesquero JB, Araujo RC, Heppenstall PA, Stucky CL, Silva JA Jr, Walther T, Oliveira SM, Pesquero JL, Paiva AC, Calixto JB, et al. (2000) Hypoalgesia and altered inflammatory responses in mice lacking kinin B1 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8140-8145.
Proud D, Baumgarten CR, Naclerio RM, and Ward PE (1987) Kinin metabolism in human nasal secretions during experimentally induced allergic rhinitis. J Immunol 138: 428-434.[Abstract]
Regoli D, Barabe J, and Park WK (1977) Receptors for bradykinin in rabbit aortae. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 55: 855-867.[Medline]
Regoli D, Marceau F, and Barabe J (1978) De novo formation of vascular receptors for bradykinin. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 56: 674-677.[Medline]
Robertson MJ, Cunoosamy MP, and Clark KL (1992) Effects of peptidase inhibition on angiotensin receptor agonist and antagonist potency in rabbit isolated thoracic aorta. Br J Pharmacol 106: 166-172.[Medline]
Sardi SP, Errasti AE, Rey-Ares V, Rogines-Velo MP, and Rothlin RP (2000) Bradykinin B1 receptor in isolated human umbilical vein: an experimental model of the in vitro up-regulation process. Acta Pharmacol Sin 21: 105-110.[Medline]
Skeggs L, Kahn J, and Shumway N (1956) The preparation and function of the hypertensin-converting enzyme. J Exp Med 103: 295-299.[Abstract]
Tschope C, Spillmann F, Altmann C, Koch M, Westermann D, Dhayat N, Dhayat S, Bascands JL, Gera L, Hoffmann S, et al. (2004) The bradykinin B1 receptor contributes to the cardioprotective effects of AT1 blockade after experimental myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 61: 559-569.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tufan H, Ayan-Polat B, Tecder-Unal M, Polat G, Kayhan Z, and Ogus E (2003) Contractile responses of the human umbilical artery to KCl and serotonin in Ca-free medium and the effects of levcromakalim. Life Sci 72: 1321-1329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Walsh DA, Mapp PI, Wharton J, Polak JM, and Blake DR (1993) Neuropeptide degrading enzymes in normal and inflamed human synovium. Am J Pathol 142: 1610-1621.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Moreau, M.-T. Bawolak, G. Morissette, A. Adam, and F. Marceau Role of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and Protein Kinase C Signaling in the Expression of the Kinin B1 Receptor in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 949 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Pelorosso, A. V. Halperin, A. M. Palma, W. Nowak, A. E. Errasti, and R. P. Rothlin Neutral Endopeptidase Up-Regulation in Isolated Human Umbilical Artery: Involvement in Desensitization of Bradykinin-Induced Vasoconstrictor Effects J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 713 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gera, J.-P. Fortin, A. Adam, J. M. Stewart, and F. Marceau Discovery of a Dual-Function Peptide That Combines Aminopeptidase N Inhibition and Kinin B1 Receptor Antagonism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Fortin, L. Gera, J. Bouthillier, J. M. Stewart, A. Adam, and F. Marceau Endogenous Aminopeptidase N Decreases the Potency of Peptide Agonists and Antagonists of the Kinin B1 Receptors in the Rabbit Aorta J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1169 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||