JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on February 18, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.080713


0022-3565/05/3132-877-887$20.00
JPET 313:877-887, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.104.080713v1
313/2/877    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCollum, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCollum, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, M. J., Jr.

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR

Arsenite Delays Progression through Each Cell Cycle Phase and Induces Apoptosis following G2/M Arrest in U937 Myeloid Leukemia Cells

Geniece McCollum, Peter C. Keng, J. Christopher States, and Michael J. McCabe, Jr.

Departments of Environmental Medicine (G.M., M.J.M.) and Radiation Oncology (P.C.K.), School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky (J.C.S.)

Received November 12, 2004; accepted February 17, 2005.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arsenic is a well known toxicant and carcinogen that is also effective as a chemotherapeutic in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Although its effects on humans are well documented, arsenic's mechanism of action is not well understood. Its ability to act as a carcinogen and as a chemotherapeutic seems paradoxical. However, cancer cell transformation and cancer cell destruction can both occur through perturbations of the cell cycle machinery, making cell cycle function a likely target of arsenic action. Arsenic has previously been shown to inhibit cancer cell cycle progression, but the targeted cell cycle phase has been debated. This study was designed to identify the cell cycle phase at which U937 cells are most sensitive to arsenite-induced growth inhibition. Centrifugal elutriation was used to divide asynchronous cell cultures into specific cell cycle phase-enriched fractions. These fractions were monitored for cell cycle phase progression in the presence and absence of sodium arsenite. We found an overall reduction in cell cycle progression rather than induction of arrest at one specific checkpoint. G2/M is the phase most sensitive to arsenite-induced apoptosis. However, arsenite profoundly affects U937 cell growth by increasing the length of time it takes cells to transit each phase of the cell cycle. Future study of cell cycle inhibition by arsenic should consider that the effect may not be mediated by the major cell cycle checkpoints. Arsenic's ability to inhibit growth in any cell cycle phase may increase its value as a chemotherapeutic used together with other, more phase-selective agents, such as camptothecin.


Despite its well known toxicity and carcinogenicity, arsenic is approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) (Antman, 2001Go). Treatment with arsenic trioxide, a source of trivalent, inorganic arsenic, otherwise known as arsenite, produces complete remission in more than 50% of APL patients (Miller et al., 2002Go). Chemotherapeutic blood plasma levels of arsenic trioxide corresponding to 1 to 4 µM arsenite lead to apoptosis of leukemic cells, whereas lower levels (0.2–1 µM arsenite) lead to differentiation (Chen et al., 2001Go). The large body of research directed at understanding the mechanism through which arsenic acts to eliminate APL cells is summarized by Miller et al. (2002Go). Various mechanisms have been proposed, but no unified agreement has been reached. Some examples of proposed mechanisms include: degradation of the PML-RAR{alpha} fusion oncoprotein characteristic of APL cells, influence on signaling pathways (such as activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase), and induction of oxidative stress (Huang et al., 1999Go; Jing et al., 1999Go; Cai et al., 2000Go; Zhu et al., 2001Go). Arsenite reacts with biomolecules through binding to vicinal thiol groups, resulting in disruption of protein activity (Reglinski, 1998Go; Miller et al., 2002Go). It has been shown to inhibit enzymes such as succinic dehydrogenase and acetylcholine esterase (Reglinski, 1998Go; Chou et al., 2000Go). These targets are affected by arsenite at very high concentrations and may be more relevant to overt arsenite toxicity than to chemotherapeutic effects. The specific proteins targeted by more clinically relevant concentrations of arsenite are unknown.

To date, most study of the chemotherapeutic mechanism of arsenite has concentrated on experiments with the NB4 cell line (Wang et al., 1998Go; Jing et al., 1999Go; Cai et al., 2000Go). NB4 cells were derived from an APL patient, and they contain the PML-RAR{alpha} fusion oncoprotein (de The and Chelbi-Alix, 2001Go). The U937 cell line is another model system for studying the effects of arsenite (McCabe et al., 2000Go). U937 was derived from a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with a block in differentiation of monocyte progenitors (Sundstrom and Nilsson, 1976Go). U937 does not contain the PML-RAR{alpha} fusion protein, yet arsenite inhibits its growth and enhances its differentiation (McCabe et al., 2000Go). Therefore, U937 is a good model system for the study of arsenite's effects on myeloid leukemia cells outside of its effects on PML-RAR{alpha}. Because U937 cells respond to arsenite similarly to APL cells, arsenite's mechanism of action in this context will shed light on its chemotherapeutic mechanism.

Sodium arsenite, another source of trivalent, inorganic arsenic, can cause a growth delay in U937 cells at concentrations below 10 µM (McCabe et al., 2000Go). However, the nature of this delay is unknown. Cell growth is dependent on the efficient passage of cells through all phases of the cell cycle (Murray and Hunt, 1993Go). During times of stress, it is commonly held that cells may pause in their cell cycle progression at one of two major checkpoints. One checkpoint lies at the end of G1 as a cell prepares to enter S phase. The other can be triggered during G2, before a cell commits to mitosis. However, cell cycle progression can be altered outside of these two best studied checkpoints. In response to DNA damage, not only do cells arrest in G2 phase, but S phase transit is also slowed to allow for DNA repair to occur in parallel with its replication (Abraham, 2001Go). Agents that interfere with mitotic spindle function induce a metaphase arrest, preventing asymmetrical distribution of chromosomes (Howell et al., 2000Go). Many proteins are involved in the regulation of each of these cell cycle transitions. To narrow the field of possible molecular targets of arsenite, it is desirable to define the cell cycle phase during which cells are most sensitive. Here, we present evidence that supports previous findings that G2/M cells are most sensitive to arsenite-induced cell cycle arrest leading to apoptosis (Li and Broome, 1999Go; Park et al., 2001Go; Halicka et al., 2002Go; Ling et al., 2002Go; States et al., 2002Go; Cai et al., 2003Go). However, another dramatic effect of arsenite is an induction of nonphase-specific cell cycle prolongation (i.e., arsenite increases the length of time it takes a cell to transit each phase of the cell cycle). The prolongation of cell cycle transit time has the potential to contribute greatly to growth suppression by arsenite, because at any given time, the percentage of cells susceptible to G2/M arrest and apoptosis is small compared with the percentage of cells susceptible to G1 or S phase delay.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents. Sodium m-arsenite (i.e., NaAsO2) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Fresh stock solutions of sodium arsenite (2 mM in Hanks' balanced salt solution) were prepared before every experiment and filter sterilized using a 0.2-µm syringe filter. The following reagents were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich: 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), pepsin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), Tween 20, propidium iodide (PI), RNase A, N-CBZ-Val-Ala-Asp(O-Me) fluoromethyl ketone (Z-VAD-FMK), and camptothecin. Concentrated HCl was purchased from Fisher Scientific Co. (Pittsburgh, PA). Purified mouse {alpha}-bromodeoxyuridine, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 specific monoclonal antibody, 1x cell lysis buffer, and Ac-DEVD-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin substrate were purchased from BD Biosciences PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM antibody was purchased from Caltag Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). The TG-3 antibody (in hybridoma culture supernatant) was a generous gift from Dr. Peter Davies (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY). HEPES solution (1 M) and 1x PBS were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Glycerol and dithiothreitol were purchased from J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ).

Cell Culture. U937 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 0.1% gentamicin. RPMI 1640, FBS, glutamine, and gentamicin were obtained from Invitrogen. Cells were maintained in logarithmic growth at a density between 0.1 and 1 x 106 cells/ml at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere consisting of 5% CO2. For most experiments, the seeding cell density was 2.0 x 105 cells/ml.

PI Exclusion Assay. U937 cells (2.7 x 106 cells/10 ml) were cultured for up to 72 h with or without arsenite. Cells were washed twice with 1x PBS, then 1 x 106 cells in 1 ml of PBS were stained with 1.67 µg of propidium iodide. PI fluorescence was determined by flow cytometry on a FACScalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cells with intact membranes excluded PI and were counted as viable. The percentage of PI-excluding cells in each sample was normalized to the percentage of such cells in the control sample. A minimum of 10,000 cells/sample were analyzed. Data were collected and analyzed using CellQuest software.

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell Cycle Progression. U937 cells were enriched for cells in various cell cycle phases via centrifugal elutriation as described by Donaldson et al. (1997Go). Cells (2.0 x 106 cells/10 ml) were exposed to 0 to 5 µM arsenite and/or 0 to 50 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 0 to 24 h and pulse-labeled by incubation with 10 µM BrdU for 15 min at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After being washed with 10 ml of 1x PBS, the cells were fixed with 70% ethanol overnight at 4°C. Fixed cells were rinsed with PBS and incubated with 0.2 mg/ml pepsin/2 N HCl/1x PBS for 20 min at 37°C. Following two washes with 1x PBS/0.5% BSA/0.5% Tween 20, cells were treated with 1x PBS/2% FBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with 0.5 µg of purified mouse {alpha}-bromodeoxyuridine and 1 µl of TG-3 hybridoma culture supernatant/10 µl in the dark overnight at 4°C and washed in 1x PBS/0.5% BSA/0.5% Tween 20. Cells were incubated with 0.5 µg of FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody and 0.1 µg of APC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM antibody/10 µl in the dark for 2 h at 4°C and washed in 1x PBS/0.5% BSA/0.5% Tween 20. They were then incubated in 500 µl of PBS containing 10 µg/ml PI in the presence of RNase A (100 U/ml final) for at least 30 min at room temperature. PI fluorescence (i.e., DNA content), FITC fluorescence (BrdU incorporation), and APC fluorescence (TG-3 labeling) were determined by flow cytometry on a FACScalibur (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 20,000 cells/sample were analyzed. Data were collected and analyzed using CellQuest software.

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell Cycle Kinetics. U937 cells (2.0 x 106 cells/10 ml) were pulse labeled by incubation with 10 µM BrdU for 15 min at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. They were then washed once with 1x PBS and cultured for 4 h with or without arsenite. After being washed with 10 ml of PBS, the cells were fixed with 70% ethanol overnight at 4°C. Fixed cells were labeled with anti-BrdU and TG-3 antibody, stained with PI, and analyzed as described above.

Caspase Activity Assay. Elutriated U937 cells were exposed to 0to5 µM arsenite and/or 0 to 50 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 8 or 12 h. Cells were harvested and washed in ice-cold PBS. Cell pellets were snapfrozen in dry ice bath to preserve protein integrity and stored at –80°C. Pellets were lysed with 1x cell lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl/10 mM NaH2PO4/NaHPO4, pH 7.5/130 mM NaCl/1% Triton X-100/10 mM sodium pyrophosphate). Cell lysate was added to 1x HEPES buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, and 2 mM dithiothreitol) containing Ac-DEVD-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin substrate. The fluorescence emission yielded by 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin release was monitored every 45 s for 1 h at a temperature of 37°C in a SPECTRAmax GEMINI XS Dual-Scanning Microplate Spectrofluorometer from Molecular Devices (Sunnyvale, CA). The protein concentration of each lysate was determined by bicinchoninic acid protein assay using a kit from Pierce Chemical (Rockford, IL). Caspase activity was expressed in terms of arbitrary fluorescence units released per mg protein per second.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arsenite (5 µM) Inhibits U937 Cell Growth without Inducing Cell Death. U937 cells were cultured in the presence of sodium arsenite, and cell recovery at 24 or 48 h was determined using a Coulter Counter. As shown in Fig. 1A, there was a concentration-dependent decrease in cell recovery from arsenite-treated cultures. To show that arsenite is cytostatic but not cytotoxic at clinically relevant concentrations of 5 µM or less, U937 cells were treated with up to 20 µM arsenite for 24 to 72 h, and cell viability based on PI exclusion was assessed using flow cytometry (Fig. 1B). The ability of the PI exclusion assay to detect cell death is demonstrated by the loss of viability seen with exposure to higher, cytotoxic concentrations of arsenite (10–20 µM). However, the majority of U937 cells are viable with arsenite treatments up to 5 µM for 72 h. Therefore, lower concentrations of arsenite (≤5 µM) inhibit cell growth but do not immediately induce cell death. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3), rather than sodium arsenite (NaAsO2), is the chemical form of the drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of APL. Both are sources of trivalent inorganic arsenic, differing mainly in their stoichiometry. The experiments shown in Fig. 1 were repeated using 0.5 to 5 µM arsenic trioxide to establish that the effect is similar to that seen with sodium arsenite. The results were virtually identical to those shown in Fig. 1 except that arsenic trioxide inhibits growth and reduces viability at lower concentrations (data not shown), a difference predicted by the fact that arsenic trioxide contains more arsenic per mole than does sodium arsenite. We chose to use sodium arsenite in the remaining experiments because it is far more soluble in aqueous solution than is arsenic trioxide, which must be solubilized in 1 M sodium hydroxide prior to use.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Arsenite treatment decreases cell recovery but is not cytotoxic at concentrations up to 5 µM. A, U937 cells treated with sodium arsenite (0–10 µM) for 24 or 48 h. Cells were counted with a Coulter counter. Points represent average percentage of the starting cell number over at least six experiments. Error bars represent SEM. B, U937 cells treated with sodium arsenite (0–20 µM) for 24 to 72 h. PI exclusion was measured using flow cytometry to demonstrate cell viability. Results are expressed as percentage of viable cells normalized to the percentage of viable cells in the control samples at each time point. The graph is derived from three independent experiments in which duplicate measures were taken. Error bars represent coefficient of variance.

 

Arsenite Induces Mitotic Arrest in U937 Myeloid Leukemia Cells. Centrifugal elutriation was used to obtain a cell fraction containing an enriched population of cells within the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Following elutriation and collection of the enriched G2/M fraction, BrdU-pulsed cells were labeled with anti-BrdU and monoclonal TG-3 antibody and stained with PI to verify their cell cycle phase distribution. TG-3 antibody recognizes mitosis-specific phosphorylation of nucleolin, making TG-3 labeling a useful marker to discriminate mitotic cells from G2 phase cells (Anderson et al., 1998Go). As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, G2/M cells were highly enriched following elutriation (compare top and bottom right quadrants of Fig. 2, A and B), and TG-3 staining revealed that ~12% of the elutriated cells were mitotic. Cells from this elutriated fraction were treated for up to 8 h with sodium arsenite. Cell cycle analysis at the end of 8 h of treatment showed that the mitotic population (top right quadrant) decreased in untreated samples (Fig. 2C) but increased in the presence of arsenite (Fig. 2D). The accumulation of mitotic cells suggests that arsenite arrested cells in mitosis. This was confirmed by a BrdU pulse-chase experiment to track the progression of S phase cells through mitosis. Asynchronous cells were pulsed with BrdU prior to treatment with sodium arsenite for up to 12 h. Before and after treatment, cell cycle distribution was analyzed with anti-BrdU, TG-3 antibody, and PI (Fig. 3; data not shown). In a representative experiment, before treatment, ~1.7% of the cells were shown to be mitotic by TG-3 labeling (Fig. 3A, leftmost panel, total of top and bottom right quadrants). As expected, all of the mitotic cells were BrdU-negative (bottom right quadrant). After 4 h, in untreated samples, most of the cells that were in G2/M at the beginning of the experiment have moved out of mitosis as shown by a lack of TG-3 labeling. Few cells remain in the BrdU-negative mitotic population (Fig. 3A, middle panel, bottom right quadrant). With arsenite treatment, the population of BrdU-negative mitotic cells remains constant over 4 h (Fig. 3A, compare bottom right quadrants of leftmost and rightmost panels), indicating that cells in mitosis upon arsenite treatment are arrested there. Additionally, cells are also slow to transit from S phase into mitosis, as evidenced by the decreased percentage of BrdU-positive mitotic cells in the arsenite-treated samples after 4 h (Fig. 3A, compare top right quadrants of middle and rightmost panels). In an asynchronous population, the percentage of cells in mitosis is small (~2%), but we have observed consistent, statistically significant differences between untreated and arsenite-treated cells (Fig. 3B), suggesting that there is a real difference in the kinetics of cell cycle transit between these two populations.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Arsenite treatment results in the accumulation of mitotic cells. A and B, U937 cells in G2 and M phases of the cell cycle enriched by centrifugal elutriation. C and D, cells incubated for 8 h with sodium arsenite (0 or 5 µM). Cells were subjected to flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation, DNA content, and TG-3 antibody labeling. Representative density dot plots of TG-3 antibody labeling versus DNA content show that arsenite treatment increases the percentage of cells labeling with TG-3 antibody. A, cells before elutriation. B, cell fraction enriched for G2 and M phases by centrifugal elutriation. C, untreated cells 8 h after elutriation. D, cells treated with 5 µM arsenite for 8 h after elutriation. Values refer to the percentage of cells that are mitotic (found within the top right quadrant). The figure is one representative experiment of six.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Arsenite treatment results in mitotic arrest. An asynchronous population of U937 cells was labeled with BrdU for 15 min. Cells were then incubated for 4 h with 0 or 5 µM sodium arsenite. After treatment, they were subjected to flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation and TG-3 antibody labeling. A, representative contour plots of BrdU incorporation versus TG-3 antibody labeling. Values refer to the percentage of cells in the top or bottom right quadrants. The bottom right quadrant contains BrdU-negative mitotic cells, and the top right quadrant contains cells that have moved from S phase into mitosis during the 4-h incubation. The figure is one representative experiment of three. B, compilation of the data from the three experiments represented in A. Results are presented in a bar graph as average cell percentage (white, control; black, arsenite-treated). Error bars = S.D. *, P = 0.008; **, P = 0.0002, arsenite-treated compared with control according to Student's paired t test with a two-tailed distribution.

 

Arsenite Induces Apoptosis in G2/M Phase U937 Cells. Arsenite (5 µM) is known to induce apoptosis in U937 cells (McCabe et al., 2000Go). Many studies have been published in support of a G2/M phase-specific sensitivity to arsenite-induced apoptosis in this and other cell types (Li and Broome, 1999Go; Park et al., 2001Go; Halicka et al., 2002Go; Ling et al., 2002Go; States et al., 2002Go; Cai et al., 2003Go). Given the induction of mitotic arrest seen with arsenite treatment, we further investigated the cell cycle phase specificity of the apoptotic response. Centrifugal elutriation was used to obtain cell fractions enriched for cells with G1, S, or G2/M phase DNA content. Cell cycle phase distribution for each fraction was determined by analysis with BrdU and PI (Fig. 4; data not shown). Cells from these elutriated fractions were treated for 8 or 12 h with sodium arsenite. Treatment duration was chosen to maximize the detection of caspase activity because the relatively small number of cells obtained in each fraction of a centrifugal elutriation limits the number of samples that can be generated. Caspase activity was detected only in arsenite-treated samples with G2/M phase populations larger than those in the corresponding untreated samples (Fig. 4). An untreated population enriched for G2/M phase cells largely progressed into G1 phase over 8 h. When treated with 5 µM arsenite, the same population was delayed in G2/M phase and contained activated caspases (Fig. 4B). Caspase activation was also detected in arsenite-treated S phase-enriched cells that were delayed in G2/M following incubation for 12 h (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, arsenite treatment delays G1 phase-enriched cells in G1 phase, but caspase activation is largely absent (Fig. 4A). This suggests, in agreement with previous studies, that arsenite induces apoptosis specifically in delayed G2/M phase cell populations (Li and Broome, 1999Go; Park et al., 2001Go; Halicka et al., 2002Go; Ling et al., 2002Go; States et al., 2002Go; Cai et al., 2003Go). Experiments using the general caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD-FMK, further supported that G2/M phase is the specific cell cycle phase at which cells are vulnerable to apoptosis induction by arsenite. A cell fraction enriched for cells with S phase DNA content was obtained by centrifugal elutriation, and its cell cycle distribution was confirmed by analysis with BrdU and PI (Fig. 5A). Cells from this S phase-enriched fraction were treated for 16 h with sodium arsenite, with Z-VAD-FMK, or with both arsenite and the inhibitor. Once again, the treatment time was chosen to maximize the effect to most efficiently use the elutriated cells. Z-VAD-FMK treatment, alone, had no effect on cell cycle distribution. Over the course of 16 h, most of the cells in the control sample move from S phase to G1 or S phase of the next cell cycle (Fig. 5B). These results are not unexpected because cell cycle kinetics analyses have shown that untreated U937 cells complete S phase in approximately 10 to 12 h and G2/M phase in approximately 4 to 8 h (data not shown). In the experiment depicted in Fig. 5, many of the cells are already near the end of S phase at elutriation, allowing plenty of time for them to enter a subsequent S phase by 16 h. With arsenite treatment, however, 16.9% of cells are arrested in mitosis, and a population of BrdU-negative cells with S phase DNA content appears (Fig. 5, A and C). The addition of Z-VAD-FMK to the culture results in the complete inhibition of arsenite-induced caspase activity (Fig. 4). Also, more cells are arrested in mitosis in response to arsenite (24.5%), and fewer cells appear in the BrdU-negative population with S phase DNA content (Fig. 5, A and D). Because a portion of this population depends on caspase activity, it is likely that this portion represents G2/M phase cells in which caspase-dependent DNA degradation is occurring. It is appropriate to say that this population has sub-G2 DNA content because one would say that cells undergoing apoptosis out of G1 phase develop sub-G1 DNA content (Nicoletti et al., 1991Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Arsenite induces caspase activation in cycling cells. U937 cells in individual phases of the cell cycle (A, G1 phase-enriched cells; B, G2/M phase-enriched cells; C, S phase-enriched cells) were enriched by centrifugal elutriation. Cells were incubated for 8 or 12 h with 0 or 5 µM sodium arsenite and/or 0 or 50 µM Z-VAD-FMK. Cell lysates were subjected to caspase activity and protein concentration analyses. Results are presented in bar graphs as average fluorescence units released per second by each sample normalized to protein concentration (white, control; black, arsenite-treated). Up to five independent experiments in which triplicate measures were taken were performed. Error bars = S.D. Cell cycle phase distributions determined by flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation and DNA content are shown as pie charts.

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Arsenite treatment results in apoptosis of mitotic cells. U937 cells in S phase of the cell cycle were enriched by centrifugal elutriation (note S phase percentage at elutriation in A). Cells were cultured in the presence or absence of 5 µM sodium arsenite and 50 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 16 h, at which time they were harvested for cell cycle analysis. A, representative cell cycle distributions, determined by flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation and DNA content, are shown for each treatment group. Mitotic cell percentage was determined from TG-3 labeling. Arsenite-treated cell populations total to less than 100% because of the presence of BrdU-negative cells with S phase DNA content that fall within the gates drawn in C and D. B, gates used to determine the percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2/M phase are indicated on a representative contour plot of BrdU incorporation versus DNA content for the untreated control sample 16 h postelutriation. C and D, representative contour plots of BrdU incorporation versus DNA content for samples treated with 5 µM arsenite (C) or with 5 µM arsenite and 50 µM Z-VAD-FMK (D). Values refer to the percentage of cells within the gates, which contain BrdU-negative cells with sub-G2 (or S phase) DNA content. The figure is one representative experiment of three.

 

Arsenite Inhibits Cell Cycle Progression through All Phases of the Cell Cycle. It has been established that arsenite induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis of mitotic cells (Li and Broome, 1999Go; Ling et al., 2002Go). However, it was important to examine the effect of arsenite on other phases of the cell cycle because ~98% of an asynchronous population is made up of nonmitotic cells, making it likely that effects on these cells have an important impact on overall growth inhibition. We have looked at progression of arsenite-treated cells from each cell cycle stage to the next and have found that arsenite slows cell growth in every phase of the cycle. Cells elutriated in G1 phase enter S phase more slowly in the presence of arsenite (Fig. 6B, compare left panels). Once in early S phase, arsenite-treated cells are slow to progress to late S phase (Fig. 6B, compare right panels). Analysis of U937 cell cycle kinetics using the method described by Begg et al. (1985Go) reveals that the DNA synthesis time in asynchronous populations of untreated cells is between 10 and 12 h (data not shown). When cells are treated with 5 µM sodium arsenite, the DNA synthesis time increases to 16 h, indicating that transit through S phase is affected. We noted earlier that cell movement from S phase to mitosis is slowed in the presence of arsenite (Fig. 3, right panel, compare top right quadrants). We wanted to determine whether it was the S to G2 phase or the G2 to M phase transition that was more sensitive to arsenite. We used centrifugal elutriation to collect fractions of cells excluding those in G1 phase to ensure that the cell populations under study contained only actively cycling cells. These fractions were allowed to grow in the presence or absence of arsenite for 8 h. An 8-h treatment allowed enough time for most cells in the untreated samples to progress out of S phase but not enough time for mitotic cells to enter a subsequent cell cycle. After treatment, the samples were analyzed by BrdU, TG-3, and PI staining. The results clearly show that cell passage from any cell cycle phase to the next is inhibited by arsenite (Fig. 7). At elutriation, ~49% of cells are in late S phase (Fig. 7A). In control samples after 8 h, ~44% of cells have moved on from S phase to later phases of the cell cycle (Fig. 7A, compare left and top right panels). In arsenite-treated samples, however, only 38% are able to exit S phase during the 8 h treatment (Fig. 7A, compare left and bottom right panels). Similar cell cycle phase transition inhibition is seen for movement from G2 to M phase and, as established earlier, for movement out of mitosis (Fig. 7B).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Arsenite treatment inhibits progression from G1 to S phase. A, U937 cells in G1 phase of the cell cycle were enriched by centrifugal elutriation at 0 h. B, cells were incubated for 4 or 8 h with 0 or 5 µM sodium arsenite, then subjected to flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation and DNA content. Representative density dot plots show that arsenite treatment decreases the percentage of cells entering S phase from G1 by 4 h and the percentage progressing through S phase by 8 h. The percentage of cells in the top left quadrant (early S phase), and the incubation times are indicated. The figure is one representative experiment of two.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Arsenite treatment decreases transit through S, G2, and M phases. A, actively cycling U937 cells enriched by centrifugal elutriation. Cells were incubated for 8 h with 0 or 5 µM sodium arsenite and then subjected to flow cytometric analysis of BrdU incorporation, DNA content, and TG-3 antibody labeling. Representative contour plots of BrdU incorporation versus DNA content are shown. Values for M phase are taken from analysis of TG-3 antibody labeling. B, cell cycle progression determined from the values in A depicted as a flow chart for both control and arsenite-treated cells. The top arrows contain values representing the percentage of cells moving between the indicated cell cycle phases in control samples over 8 h. The bottom arrows contain the same types of values for arsenite-treated cells. The values between the top and bottom arrows represent the difference between control and arsenite-treated samples. The figure is one representative experiment of four.

 

Since an important action of arsenite in U937 cells seems to be slowing of S phase progression, we thought that perhaps arsenite as a chemotherapeutic agent may be more effective if administered in combination with a drug that targets S phase cells. Such a drug is the topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin. U937 cells were cultured in the presence of 40 nM camptothecin together with 1 µM sodium arsenite, and cell recovery at 24 or 48 h was determined using a Coulter counter. As shown in Fig. 8, the decrease in cell recovery from camptothecin-treated cultures was enhanced by the addition of only 1 µM sodium arsenite. It is possible that both arsenite and camptothecin may be effective chemotherapeutic agents at lower concentrations if used in combination.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Arsenite treatment enhances growth inhibition by camptothecin. U937 cells were treated with 1 µM sodium arsenite and/or 40 nM camptothecin for 24 or 48 h. Cells were counted with a Coulter counter. As, arsenite; CT, camptothecin; 1As, treatment with 1 µM sodium arsenite; 40CT, treatment with 40 nM camptothecin. Points represent average percentage of the starting cell number over three separate experiments. Error bars = S.E.M. *, P = 0.02, 40 nM camptothecin-treated compared with the combined treatment according to Student's paired t test with a two-tailed distribution.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arsenite has potential as an effective chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of a variety of cancers (Wang et al., 1998Go; Lu et al., 1999Go; Rousselot et al., 1999Go; Seol et al., 1999Go; Zhang et al., 1999Go; Zhu et al., 1999Go; Rego et al., 2000Go; Antman, 2001Go; Bachleitner-Hofmann et al., 2001Go; Chen et al., 2001Go; de The and Chelbi-Alix, 2001Go; Wang, 2001Go; Miller et al., 2002Go). Arsenite's chemotherapeutic mechanism is not well understood. Arsenic trioxide is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of APL, which is most often characterized by the presence of the oncogenic fusion protein PML-RAR{alpha} within the leukemic cells (Chen et al., 2001Go; de The and Chelbi-Alix, 2001Go; Soignet, 2001Go). PML-RAR{alpha} exerts a double dominant-negative effect on the function of both PML and RAR{alpha} proteins, blocking both apoptosis and differentiation. It is thought that arsenite exerts its apoptotic and differentiative effects on these cells by inducing PML-RAR{alpha} degradation (Zhu et al., 2001Go). However, degradation of the oncoprotein is not the sole mechanism of arsenite action because arsenite does induce apoptosis and differentiation in cell lines that lack the fusion protein (Wang et al., 1998Go; Lu et al., 1999Go; Rousselot et al., 1999Go; Seol et al., 1999Go; Zhang et al., 1999Go; Zhu et al., 1999Go; McCabe et al., 2000Go; Rego et al., 2000Go; Bachleitner-Hofmann et al., 2001Go). Therefore, arsenite may be useful in the treatment of cancers other than APL.

Arsenite's effects on cell cycle progression have been studied in many cell types. The identification of the most arsenite-sensitive cell cycle phase has been controversial. Some studies have found that certain cells arrest in G1 phase in response to arsenite (Zhang et al., 1998Go; Park et al., 2000Go). In U937 cells, we have found that arsenite treatment induces growth arrest and apoptosis to the greatest extent in G2/M phase (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5). Also, G2/M phase cells specifically accumulate in response to combined arsenite and caspase inhibitor treatment (Fig. 5A), suggesting that it is cells in the G2/M compartment that are specifically susceptible to arsenite-induced apoptosis. However, by looking at cell cycle progression in synchronized cells, we were also able to observe that arsenite slows progression through the G1 checkpoint and through S phase (Figs. 6 and 7). These results may begin to explain why it has been difficult to pinpoint the cell cycle phase most affected by arsenite. Our results best agree with past studies that have found that trivalent arsenic species induce accumulation and apoptosis of mitotic cells in several cell types (Li and Broome, 1999Go; Park et al., 2001Go; Halicka et al., 2002Go; Ling et al., 2002Go; States et al., 2002Go; Cai et al., 2003Go). Park et al. (2001Go) reported that U937 cells accumulate in G2/M phase and undergo apoptosis in response to treatment with arsenic trioxide. They found that cells arrested in S phase by aphidicolin were resistant to apoptosis induced by trivalent arsenic. Their conclusion was that arsenite-induced apoptosis occurs specifically in cells arrested in G2/M phase. Our research takes their findings further in that we have followed the cell cycle progression of synchronized U937 cells in the absence of chemical manipulation, allowing us to eliminate any unexpected effects that may result from treating cells with two different cell cycle inhibitory agents simultaneously (i.e., trivalent arsenic and aphidicolin). Also, we were able to separate effects on G2 phase cells from those on mitotic cells by use of the TG-3 antibody. As a result, we found that sodium arsenite induces arrest followed by apoptosis in both of these distinct cell cycle compartments. Ling et al. (2002Go) used a panel of various cancer cell lines and found that all of them underwent mitotic arrest in response to arsenite. Along with mitotic arrest, the cells also displayed characteristics of apoptosis [activation of caspases, poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage] that were specific to mitotic cells. Similarly, we found that arsenite-induced caspase activation occurs primarily in cells outside of G1 phase (Fig. 4) and that caspase inhibition exacerbates arsenite-induced G2/M phase arrest (Fig. 5). We used a terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase dUTP nick end labeling assay to detect caspase-induced DNA strand breaks in elutriated cell populations and found that with 8 h of arsenite treatment, such breaks could only be detected in cells with S or G2/M phase DNA content (data not shown). It is important to understand the mechanism by which arsenite induces arrest and apoptosis in M phase because this may be an important way in which arsenic can target cancer cells.

In the U937 cell model, however, it seems that the effects of arsenite on mitotic cells, although severe, may be out-weighed by its ability to stall cell cycle progression in other phases of the cell cycle. For instance, it is interesting that no appreciable cell death is observed even at 72 h of arsenite treatment at a concentration known to induce apoptosis in the U937 cell line (Fig. 1B). Although apoptotic cells will maintain membrane integrity longer than necrotic cells, under cell culture conditions, at late stages, even apoptotic cell membrane integrity will be compromised. The conclusion we can draw from the information in Fig. 1 is that arsenite's inhibitory effects on cell recovery are less a result of the induction of cell death, be it apoptotic or necrotic, and more a result of growth inhibition. We went on to observe that arsenite inhibits cell cycle progression through all phases of the cell cycle (Figs. 6 and 7). The difference in the percentage of cells that transit from phase to phase between control and arsenite-treated samples, as shown in Fig. 7B, is partly a function of the decreased movement through the preceding cell cycle transitions. However, the difference increases with each subsequent transition, showing that arsenite exerts an inhibitive influence at each phase. Because cells in every phase of the cell cycle are affected, arsenite treatment profoundly decreases the rate of U937 cell growth (Fig. 1A). Cells that survive mitosis in the presence of arsenite (seen, for example, in the bottom left quadrant of Fig. 2D) remain susceptible to growth inhibition in other phases, further highlighting the importance of arsenite's effects on nonmitotic cells. Our conclusion is that although mitotic cells are most sensitive to arsenite-induced apoptosis, arsenite also inhibits growth in this cell line through the accumulation of its smaller effects on progression through each cell cycle phase.

We have observed that arsenite-treated cells are slow to move from G1 to S phase (Fig. 6). The G1 checkpoint is usually mediated via p53 activation, but the U937 cell line lacks p53 protein because of a 46-base deletion mutation in the p53 gene (Sugimoto et al., 1992Go). However, p21 activation has been observed in these cells, especially in the context of differentiation induction by 1{alpha}, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (Liu et al., 1996Go). We have used immunoblotting to look for increases in p21 levels in arsenite-treated U937 cells and have found none (data not shown). We have similarly found no changes in levels of other negative regulators of the G1 checkpoint: p27 and retinoblastoma protein (data not shown). These results were initially surprising, but it soon became clear that arsenite may not inhibit cell growth in this cell line by targeting a defined checkpoint. The uniformity of its effect on progression through G1, S, and G2 phases suggests that it does not activate a target with a negative influence at a distinct cell cycle phase transition, but rather that it inhibits something fundamental to the movement of cells into and through the cycle. Likely candidates are proteins involved in the process of DNA synthesis. A direct impairment of DNA synthesis would explain the apparent hesitation of cells to enter S phase and the increased S phase transit time (Fig. 6; data not shown). Impaired DNA synthesis may also cause subtle DNA damage that could trigger a G2 delay. Future studies will examine the effects of arsenite on the initiation of DNA synthesis and on the elongation of nascent DNA strands.

We have presented data that suggest that an overall slowing of cell cycle progression is a pronounced effect of arsenite in U937 cells. The most sensitive cells are those in mitosis because they undergo arsenite-induced apoptosis, but the growth-slowing effect of arsenite affects cells in every phase. In conclusion, arsenite treatment induces apoptosis in mitotic cells, as expected from the results of previous studies. Induction of apoptosis is an important chemotherapeutic mechanism that may potentially be used against many cancers. However, another important action of arsenite in U937 cells is to slow cell cycle progression of nonmitotic cells, prolonging the time spent in G1 and S phases. For this reason, arsenite as a chemotherapeutic agent may be more effective if administered in combination with a drug such as camptothecin that targets cells in S phase of the cell cycle, as suggested by the data in Fig. 8. Ultimately, a precise target of arsenic action remains to be identified, but knowledge of the specific cellular response to arsenic in a given cell type dramatically narrows the list of possible mediators of arsenic chemotherapy.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank M. A. O'Reilly and T. A. Gasiewicz for comments and suggestions that helped to develop the manuscript; Kevin Eckles for technical expertise shared in the collection of data; and David Lehmann, David Farrer, Christine Hammond, Russell Garrett, and Sara Hueber for thoughtful discussion. We also greatly appreciate thegenerous donation of the TG-3 antibody by Peter Davies of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30 ES01247 and R01 ES011314 (to J.C.S.). During the course of this study, G.M. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant T32 ES07026 and by a Predoctoral Fellowship in Pharmacology/Toxicology from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation.

doi:10.1124/jpet.104.080713.

ABBREVIATIONS: APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; PML, promyelocytic leukemia protein; RAR{alpha}, retinoic acid receptor-{alpha}; BrdU, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PI, propidium iodide; Z-VAD-FMK, N-CBZ-Val-Ala-Asp(O-Me) fluoromethyl ketone; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; APC, allophycocyanin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FBS, fetal bovine serum.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Michael J. McCabe, Jr., Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 575 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642. E-mail: michael_mccabe{at}urmc.rochester.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Abraham RT (2001) Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev 15: 2177–2196.[Free Full Text]

Anderson HJ, de Jong G, Vincent I, and Roberge M (1998) Flow cytometry of mitotic cells. Exp Cell Res 238: 498–502.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antman KH (2001) Introduction: the history of arsenic trioxide in cancer therapy. Oncologist 6 (Suppl 2): 1–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gisslinger B, Grumbeck E, and Gisslinger H (2001) Arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid: synergy with potential implications for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia? Br J Haematol 112: 783–786.[CrossRef][Medline]

Begg AC, McNally NJ, Shrieve DC, and Karcher H (1985) A method to measure the duration of DNA synthesis and the potential doubling time from a single sample. Cytometry 6: 620–626.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cai X, Shen YL, Zhu Q, Jia PM, Yu Y, Zhou L, Huang Y, Zhang JW, Xiong SM, Chen SJ, et al. (2000) Arsenic trioxide-induced apoptosis and differentiation are associated respectively with mitochondrial transmembrane potential collapse and retinoic acid signaling pathways in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 14: 262–270.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cai X, Yu Y, Huang Y, Zhang L, Jia PM, Zhao Q, Chen Z, Tong JH, Dai W, and Chen GQ (2003) Arsenic trioxide-induced mitotic arrest and apoptosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia 17: 1333–1337.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen Z, Chen GQ, Shen ZX, Chen SJ, and Wang ZY (2001) Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with arsenic compounds: in vitro and in vivo studies. Semin Hematol 38: 26–36.

Chou S, Odin M, Sage GW, and Little S (2000) Toxicological profile for arsenic, in Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA.

de The H and Chelbi-Alix MK (2001) APL, a model disease for cancer therapies? Oncogene 20: 7136–7139.[CrossRef][Medline]

Donaldson KL, McShea A, Wahl AF (1997) Separation by counterflow centrifugal elutriation and analysis of T- and B-lymphocytic cell lines in progressive stages of cell division cycle. J Immunol Meth 203: 25–33.[CrossRef][Medline]

Halicka HD, Smolewski P, Darzynkiewicz Z, Dai W, and Traganos F (2002) Arsenic trioxide arrests cells early in mitosis leading to apoptosis. Cell Cycle 1: 201–209.[Medline]

Howell BJ, Hoffman DB, Fang G, Murray AW, and Salmon ED (2000) Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers and at spindle poles in living cells. J Cell Biol 150: 1233–1250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang C, Ma WY, Li J, and Dong Z (1999) Arsenic induces apoptosis through a c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-dependent, p53-independent pathway. Cancer Res 59: 3053–3058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jing Y, Dai J, Chalmers-Redman RM, Tatton WG, and Waxman S (1999) Arsenic trioxide selectively induces acute promyelocytic leukemia cell apoptosis via a hydrogen peroxide-dependent pathway. Blood 94: 2102–2111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li YM and Broome JD (1999) Arsenic targets tubulins to induce apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells. Cancer Res 59: 776–780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ling YH, Jiang JD, Holland JF, and Perez-Soler R (2002) Arsenic trioxide produces polymerization of microtubules and mitotic arrest before apoptosis in human tumor cell lines. Mol Pharmacol 62: 529–538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu M, Lee M-H, Cohen M, Bommakanti M, and Freedman LP (1996) Transcriptional activation of the Cdk inhibitor p21 by vitamin D3 leads to the induced differentiation of the myelomonocytic cell line U937. Genes Dev 10: 142–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lu M, Levin J, Sulpice E, Sequeira-Le Grand A, Alemany M, Caen JP, and Han ZC (1999) Effect of arsenic trioxide on viability, proliferation and apoptosis in human megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines. Exp Hematol 27: 845–852.[CrossRef][Medline]

McCabe MJ Jr, Singh KP, Reddy SA, Chelladurai B, Pounds JG, Reiners JJ Jr, and States JC (2000) Sensitivity of myelomonocytic leukemia cells to arsenite-induced cell cycle disruption, apoptosis, and enhanced differentiation is dependent on the inter-relationship between arsenic concentration, duration of treatment and cell cycle phase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: 724–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller WH Jr, Schipper HM, Lee JS, Singer J, and Waxman S (2002) Mechanisms of action of arsenic trioxide. Cancer Res 62: 3893–3903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Murray A and Hunt T (1993) The Cell Cycle. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Nicoletti I, Migliorati G, Pagliacci MC, Grignani F, and Riccardi C (1991) A rapid and simple method for measuring thymocyte apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 139: 271–279.[CrossRef][Medline]

Park JW, Choi YJ, Jang MA, Baek SH, Lim JH, Passaniti T, and Kwon TK (2001) Arsenic trioxide induces G2/M growth arrest and apoptosis after caspase-3 activation and bcl-2 phosphorylation in promonocytic U937 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286: 726–734.[CrossRef][Medline]

Park WH, Seol JG, Kim ES, Hyun JM, Jung CW, Lee CC, Kim BK, and Lee YY (2000) Arsenic trioxide-mediated growth inhibition in MC/CAR myeloma cells via cell cycle arrest in association with induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21 and apoptosis. Cancer Res 60: 3065–3071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reglinski J (1998) Environmental and medicinal chemistry of arsenic, antimony and bismuth, in Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony, and Bismuth (Norman NC ed) pp 403–440, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK.

Rego EM, He LZ, Warrell RP Jr, Wang ZG, and Pandolfi PP (2000) Retinoic acid (RA) and As2O3 treatment in transgenic models of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) unravel the distinct nature of the leukemogenic process induced by the PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha oncoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 10173–10178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rousselot P, Labaume S, Marolleau JP, Larghero J, Noguera MH, Brouet JC, and Fermand JP (1999) Arsenic trioxide and melarsoprol induce apoptosis in plasma cell lines and in plasma cells from myeloma patients. Cancer Res 59: 1041–1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seol JG, Park WH, Kim ES, Jung CW, Hyun JM, Kim BK, and Lee YY (1999) Effect of arsenic trioxide on cell cycle arrest in head and neck cancer cell line PCI-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 265: 400–404.[CrossRef][Medline]

Soignet SL (2001) Clinical experience of arsenic trioxide in relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncologist 6 (Suppl 2): 11–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

States JC, Reiners JJ Jr, Pounds JG, Kaplan DJ, Beauerle BD, McNeely SC, Mathieu P, and McCabe MJ Jr (2002) Arsenite disrupts mitosis and induces apoptosis in SV40-transformed human skin fibroblasts. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 180: 83–91.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sugimoto K, Toyoshima H, Sakai R, Miyagawa K, Hagiwara K, Ishikawa F, Takaku F, Yazaki Y, and Hirai H (1992) Frequent mutations in the p53 gene in human myeloid leukemia cell lines. Blood 79: 2378–2383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sundstrom C and Nilsson K (1976) Establishment and characterization of a human histiocytic lymphoma cell line (U-937). Int J Cancer 17: 565–577.[Medline]

Wang Z-G, Rivi R, Delva L, Konig A, Scheinberg DA, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Gabrilove JL, Warrell RP Jr, and Pandolfi PP (1998) Arsenic trioxide and melarsoprol induce programmed cell death in myeloid leukemia cell lines and function in a PML and PML-RARalpha independent manner. Blood 92: 1497–1504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang ZY (2001) Arsenic compounds as anticancer agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 48 (Suppl 1): S72–76.

Zhang TC, Cao EH, Li JF, Ma W, and Qin JF (1999) Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of human gastric cancer MGC-803 cell growth by arsenic trioxide. Eur J Cancer 35: 1258–1263.

Zhang W, Ohnishi K, Shigeno K, Fujisawa S, Naito K, Nakamura S, Takeshita K, Takeshita A, and Ohno R (1998) The induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by arsenic trioxide in lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia 12: 1383–1391.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhu J, Lallemand-Breitenbach V, and de The H (2001) Pathways of retinoic acid- or arsenic trioxide-induced PML/RARalpha catabolism, role of oncogene degradation in disease remission. Oncogene 20: 7257–7265.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhu XH, Shen YL, Jing YK, Cai X, Jia PM, Huang Y, Tang W, Shi GY, Sun YP, Dai J, et al. (1999) Apoptosis and growth inhibition in malignant lymphocytes after treatment with arsenic trioxide at clinically achievable concentrations. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 772–778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Wu, M. Yamada-Mabuchi, E. J. Morris, P. S. Tanwar, L. Dobens, S. Gluderer, S. Khan, J. Cao, H. Stocker, E. Hafen, et al.
The Drosophila homolog of human tumor suppressor TSC-22 promotes cellular growth, proliferation, and survival
PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5414 - 5419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
K. Nohara, K. Ao, Y. Miyamoto, T. Suzuki, S. Imaizumi, Y. Tateishi, S. Omura, C. Tohyama, and T. Kobayashi
Arsenite-Induced Thymus Atrophy is Mediated by Cell Cycle Arrest: A Characteristic Downregulation of E2F-Related Genes Revealed by a Microarray Approach
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2008; 101(2): 226 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. M. Lehmann and M. J. McCabe Jr
Arsenite Slows S Phase Progression via Inhibition of cdc25A Dual Specificity Phosphatase Gene Transcription
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 70 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
X. Shi, A. Seluanov, and V. Gorbunova
Cell Divisions Are Required for L1 Retrotransposition
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2007; 27(4): 1264 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. F. Taylor, S. C. McNeely, H. L. Miller, G. M. Lehmann, M. J. McCabe Jr., and J. C. States
p53 Suppression of Arsenite-Induced Mitotic Catastrophe Is Mediated by p21CIP1/WAF1
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 142 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.104.080713v1
313/2/877    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCollum, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCollum, G.
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, M. J., Jr.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition