QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.104.075028v1 312/2/786    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson-Anuna, L. N. Articles by Wood, W. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson-Anuna, L. N. Articles by Wood, W. G.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Chronic Administration of Statins Alters Multiple Gene Expression Patterns in Mouse Cerebral Cortex

Department of Pharmacology (L.N.J.-A., U.I., W.G.W.), University of Minnesota School of Medicine and Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Pharmacology (G.P.E., C.F., W.E.M.) and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry (J.H.K., M.S.-Z., M.K.), ZAFES Biocenter Niederursel, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and Applied Biosystems (T.F.), Applera Germany GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany

Received July 26, 2004; accepted September 9, 2004.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Statins have been reported to lower the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease; however, the mechanism of this potentially important neuroprotective action is not understood. Lowering cholesterol levels does not appear to be the primary mechanism. Statins have pleiotropic effects in addition to lowering cholesterol, and statins may act on several different pathways involving distinct gene expression patterns that would be difficult to determine by focusing on a few genes or their products in a single study. In addition, gene expression patterns may be specific to a particular statin. To understand the molecular targets of statins in brain, DNA microarrays were used to identify gene expression patterns in the cerebral cortex of mice chronically treated with lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin. Furthermore, brain statin levels were determined using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. These studies revealed 15 genes involved in cell growth and signaling and trafficking that were similarly changed by all three statins. Overall, simvastatin had the greatest influence on expression as demonstrated by its ability to modify the expression of 23 genes in addition to those changed by all three drugs. Of particular interest was the expression of genes associated with apoptotic pathways that were altered by simvastatin. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments confirmed the microarray findings. All three drugs were detected in the cerebral cortex, and acute experiments revealed that statins are relatively rapidly removed from the brain. These results provide new insight into possible mechanisms for the potential efficacy of statins in reducing the risk of Alzheimer's disease and lay the foundation for future studies.

There is a growing recognition that statins have pleiotropic effects beyond lowering cholesterol levels. Pleiotropic effects of statins outside of the central nervous system have been described that include, for example, activation of protein kinase Akt, up-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase expression, anti-inflammatory actions, and antioxidant activity (reviewed in Werner et al., 2002). In an experimental model of stroke, brain tissue of rats treated with either simvastatin or atorvastatin displayed increased synaptogenesis, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis that was cholesterol-independent (Chen et al., 2003). In another study, however, simvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and mevastatin protected mouse neurons from N-methyl-D-aspartate-mediated excitotoxicity and cell death and appeared to be cholesterol-dependent because alterations in cholesterol by cyclodextrin modified excitotoxicity (Zacco et al., 2003). The potential neuroprotective effects of statins may include several different pathways involving distinct gene expression patterns that would be difficult to determine by focusing on a few genes or their products in a single study. In addition, gene expression patterns may be specific to a particular statin. Therefore, to understand the molecular targets of statins in brain, DNA microarrays were used to identify gene expression patterns in the cerebral cortex of mice chronically treated with the two hydrophobic statins lovastatin and simvastatin and the hydrophilic statin pravastatin. Lovastatin has been detected in human cerebrospinal fluid, whereas pravastatin is not thought to cross the blood-brain barrier (Botti et al., 1991) even though patients taking pravastatin were at a lower risk for developing AD (Jick et al., 2000; Wolozin et al., 2000; Rockwood et al., 2002). Statins may accumulate in brain as a result of chronic administration including pravastatin, and therefore statin levels were determined in cerebral cortex of mice acutely and chronically administered statins. Statin quantification was accomplished using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). We demonstrate that statins have pleiotropic effects on gene expression in the brain of mice treated with lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin. The three statins altered expression of numerous genes in the brain, particularly genes associated with cell growth and signaling and trafficking that could be fundamental contributors to neuroprotection. Overlap in effects of the three statins on gene expression was high. However, simvastatin altered expression of more genes than the other statins that could be due to differences in brain levels or targeting of specific genes. Levels of the three statins were detected in brain suggesting that all three drugs were able to cross the blood-brain barrier and that statin levels declined quickly in the brain. Simvastatin was detected at the highest concentration in the brain followed by lovastatin and pravastatin. Cholesterol levels were reduced between 8% and 13% in the cerebral cortex. Statins have pleiotropic effects on gene expression in brain in addition to acting on cholesterol levels suggesting potential pathways of neuroprotection.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Statin Administration. Female C57BL/6 mice 2 months of age were used in this study and were purchased from Charles River (Sulzbach, Germany). Mice were administered lovastatin, pravastatin (100 mg/kg b.wt.), or simvastatin (50 mg/kg b.wt.) by oral gavage once a day for 21 days. The difference in the drug dose of lovastatin and pravastatin compared with simvastatin is based on the differences in efficacy of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with simvastatin being more potent (Law et al., 2003). Statin concentrations used were based on earlier studies using mice (Eckert et al., 2001; Kirsch et al., 2003). There were four mice per statin group, and four mice served as controls and received the statin vehicle (0.2% w/v, agarose gel/kilograms of body weight). Mice were weighed daily to calculate statin and vehicle dosage. Animals were killed by decapitation 24 h following the last treatment. Cerebral cortex was dissected, weighed, and either placed at -80°C or homogenized in 5 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4 (1 ml of buffer per 100 mg of brain.). In a separate experiment, mice were acutely treated with one of the three statins, and statin levels in cerebral cortex were determined at 1, 3, and 6 h following statin administration.

RNA Isolation and Microarray Analysis. RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), chloroform, and 100% ethanol according to manufacturer's instructions. Microarray analysis was performed using the Affymetrix chip Murine Genome U74Av2 (www.affymetrix.com). Twenty micrograms of RNA were precipitated from stock RNA and used in microarray experiments. Reactions were performed according to the GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual and all reagents were purchased from Invitrogen unless otherwise indicated. Targets were hybridized to MU74Av2 probe arrays for 16 h according to the Affymetrix protocol. Washing, staining, and scanning procedures were performed by the Affymetrix Core Unit located at the University of Minnesota. Data were analyzed using Microarray Suite (MAS) 5.0 and GeneSpring 6 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA). The following criteria were used to select candidate genes for further analysis: 1) gene expression was rated as "present" by specific Affymetrix criteria; 2) hybridization levels were rated as "changed" by specific Affymetrix criteria; and 3) there was 1.8-fold difference in hybridization intensity/average differences and significantly different compared with control group.

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reactions (RT-PCR). RT-PCR were used to confirm microarray findings of selected candidate genes satisfying the criteria described above. The gene candidates that were selected for RT-PCR were genes that are well defined with respect to neuronal function and apoptosis. In addition, because simvastatin had the greatest effect on gene expression compared with the other statins, we elected to do RT-PCR on specific genes whose expression was altered by simvastatin particularly with respect to apoptosis. Reactions were carried out using 5 µg of RNA from the same sample stock used in microarray analysis. PCR products were run on a 2% gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized using the Stratagene Eagle Eye II system. Densitometry was used to ascertain relative changes in transcriptional levels due to statin treatment.

LC/MS/MS. Statin levels in brain were quantified using LC/MS/MS. Liquid chromatography was carried out on an Agilent 1100 instrument (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) using a monolithic reversed-phase column (Chromolith Performance rod, 100 mm, i.d. 4.6 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Separation of the analytes was achieved using a gradient solvent system: solvent A (water/acidic acid pH 3.1), solvent B (95% acetonitril/5% water/acidic acid pH 3.1): 0-2 min, linear from 60% A to 20% A; 2-5 min, 20% A; 5-5.1 min, from 20% A to 60% A; 5.1-8 min, 60% A. Solvents were degassed by the Agilent 1100 system online degasser. Electrospray data was acquired using an AB-Sciex (Concord, ON, Canada) API 4000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer in the positive ion mode with a spray voltage of 4.5 kV and a declustering potential of 40-80, depending on the statin investigated. The orthogonal Turbo-V source's injectors were heated to 450°C to allow connection to the high-pressure liquid chromatography without mobile phase splitting. The values of the curtain gas (30 psig), nebulizer gas (30 psig), and turbo gas (60 psig) were the same for all statins. The dwell time for the multiple reaction monitoring was 200 ms. MS/MS was performed using nitrogen as collision gas (collision-activated dissociation gas setting 6) at a collision cell exhibit potential of 6 to 11 V. Both Q1 and Q3 were operated at unit resolution. The instrument parameters were optimized for the transition of the parent ion of each statin to its major fragment. During the preliminary experiments, the following transitions produced the highest signals in the multiple reaction monitoring mode: pravastatin (m/z 425269), lovastatin hydroxy acid (m/z 423303), simvastatin hydroxy acid (m/z 437285), lovastatin (m/z 405199), and simvastatin (m/z 419199). Quantification of the statins was based on internal standardization using the peak area ratios of the analyte and the internal standard.

Cholesterol Determination. Cholesterol was determined enzymatically using procedures previously reported (Kirsch et al., 2003).

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Statins Alter Gene Expression in Cerebral Cortex. Our overall hypothesis was that the action of statins in the brain is not fully explainable by inhibition of the HMG-CoA reductase pathway but involves multiple pathways. We used microarray and RT-PCR to identify those gene expression pathways in cerebral cortex of mice treated with either lovastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin, and statin levels were quantified using LC/MS/MS. Simvastatin had the largest effect on the number of genes meeting the criteria for significant change. There were 38 genes whose expression levels were altered by simvastatin, lovastatin 26 genes, and pravastatin 21 genes. For each of the statins, more genes showed an increase in expression than a decrease in gene expression.

Table 1 shows that there were 15 genes whose expression was significantly altered by each of the three statins. These genes could be grouped into the broad categories of cell growth and signaling and trafficking. Of particular interest are three genes related to cell growth: Enc1, Cotl1, and Arh. These genes contribute to actin function, a process reported to be disrupted in AD (Butterfield, 2002).

Expression levels of several potentially important genes involved with signaling and trafficking were increased by the three statins (Table 1). Expression levels of MCT2 were increased by each statin. MCT2 encodes for a monocarboxylic acid transporter-2, and this transporter family has been recently shown to transport the acid form of lovastatin into glomerular mesangial cells (Nagasawa et al., 2002). Of the 15 genes whose expression was changed by each of the three statins, only Fin15 listed under cell growth showed a decrease in gene expression. Fin15 belongs to a group of genes that are stimulated by fibroblast growth factors.

Table 2 contains data on gene expression changes induced by either lovastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin but not all three drugs. Simvastatin altered expression levels of 23 genes, lovastatin 11 genes, and pravastatin 6 genes. Overall, genes most affected were in cell growth, signaling and trafficking, and genes associated with apoptosis in the case of simvastatin. Table 2 shows that there was a clustering of genes in the cell growth family associated with glucose homeostasis (Igfbp3, Hk1, and Gpi1). Expression of Igfbp3 was significantly elevated by pravastatin and simvastatin. Lovastatin increased gene expression of Igfbp3 by 1.7-fold, but did not meet the 1.8 or greater cutoff. HK1 is the gene that encodes hexokinase 1, the key glucose phosphorylating enzyme, and expression of HK1 was significantly increased by simvastatin and pravastatin. Expression levels of Npy1r were significantly increased for lovastatin and pravastatin. Npy1r encodes the neuropeptide Y receptor Y1. NPY receptor densities and NPY levels were reported to be decreased in AD brains and cerebrospinal fluid (Martel et al., 1990; Nilsson et al., 2001). The neuropeptide gene Hcrt showed significantly increased expression by lovastatin and pravastatin. Hcrt encodes the orexin precursor (hypocretin) that is cleaved, resulting in two peptides (Ferguson and Samson, 2003). The hypocretins play a significant role in energy metabolism and arousal (Ferguson and Samson, 2003). Simvastatin significantly increased expression levels of Edn1 that encodes the endothelin-1 precursor (Table 2). The mature peptide endothelin-1 has been reported to contribute to neuroprotection of cells in vitro (Walter and Stella, 2003).

Expression levels of specific genes associated with apoptosis (c-fos, c-myc, H1.2, and Bcl-2) were altered primarily by simvastatin (Table 2). Lovastatin only significantly increased expression of c-myc, and pravastatin did not significantly modify expression levels of c-fos, c-myc, H1.2, or Bcl-2. Simvastatin significantly reduced expression of the proto-oncogenic gene c-fos. On the other hand, both lovastatin and simvastatin significantly increased expression of the oncogene c-myc. Myc proteins are involved in basic cellular processes such as proliferation, growth, apoptosis, and differentiation (Schuhmacher et al., 2001). Simvastatin significantly increased expression levels of H1.2, a gene encoding the linker histone H1.2. A potentially important gene whose expression level was increased by simvastatin was the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2. This gene has been shown to suppress apoptosis in different cell types, and it is thought to play a pivotal role in neuronal cell survival (Akhtar et al., 2004). Lovastatin and pravastatin did increase Bcl-2 gene expression by 1.75- and 3.8-fold, respectively, but within-group variability negated statistically significant differences compared with control expression.

A sample of five candidate genes (Enc-1, Npy1r, c-fos, c-myc, and Bcl-2) were selected for confirmation using RT-PCR. Of particular interest, were c-fos, c-myc, and Bcl-2 because of the linkage of statins with cell growth and apoptosis. Figure 1, panels A-E show that expression levels were confirmed.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. RT-PCR analysis of candidate gene expression and confirmation of microarray results. The gels displayed here are representative of RT-PCR experiments performed on each sample for each candidate gene normalized by calculating the ratio of specific mRNA to GAPDH mRNA that can be seen in the panel for Enc-1. Densitometric analysis provided a measure of changes in relative transcription of statin-treated samples compared with control. Results are expressed as mean densitometric results ± S.E.M. (n 3). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with control values. Lov, lovastatin; Pra, pravastatin; Sim, simvastatin.

Statin Levels in the Cerebral Cortex. We determined lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin levels in the cerebral cortex of mice that had received statins for 21 days using LC/MS/MS. Figure 2 shows that relatively low levels of lovastatin and simvastatin were detected in the cerebral cortex following the 24-h wash out period. Pravastatin was not detected in the cerebral cortex of chronically treated animals 24 h following treatment. The low levels of lovastatin and simvastatin and the absence of pravastatin at 24 h were puzzling because of the significant effects of the three statins on gene expression in the cerebral cortex. One possible explanation was that statins were not accumulating in the brain but were being transported out of the brain. To examine statin accumulation and removal, we determined statin levels in the cerebral cortex at 1, 3, and 6 h after an acute statin treatment. At these time points, all three statins were successfully detected in the brain (Fig. 2). Not surprisingly, brain levels of the three statins reflected their hydrophobicity with simvastatin levels > lovastatin levels > pravastatin levels. The maximum average concentrations of simvastatin, lovastatin, and pravastatin are 600, 300, and 100 pmol/g brain, respectively.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Statin levels in the cerebral cortex of acutely treated and chronically treated mice. Acute treatment consisted of a single administration, and statin levels were determined at 1, 3, and 6 h postadministration using LC/MS/MS. Chronic administration was for 21 days and statin levels were determined 24 h after the last statin administration. Means ± S.E.M. (n = 4 samples/treatment).

Statins Reduce Cholesterol Levels in Cerebral Cortex. There was a small but significant reduction in cholesterol levels of the cerebral cortex of mice treated with the three statins, but only cholesterol levels of pravastatin- and simvastatin-treated mice were significantly lower when compared with control mice (Fig. 3). Percentage of reduction in cholesterol levels compared with the cerebral cortex of control mice were: lovastatin 8%, pravastatin 11%, and simvastatin 13%. Cholesterol levels in the cerebral cortex did not differ significantly among the different statin-treated mice. Expression levels of the gene HMGCR encoding HMG-CoA reductase were not significantly changed by the three statins (data not shown).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Cholesterol levels in cerebral cortex of mice administered statins for 21 days. Cholesterol levels were determined using an enzyme assay. Data are the means ± S.E.M. (n = 4 samples/group). *, p < 0.05 compared with the control group. Lov, lovastatin; Pra, pravastatin; Sim, simvastatin.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The results of this study show that, indeed, statins have pleiotropic effects on gene expression in brain in addition to acting on cholesterol levels. We did observe a small reduction in cerebral cortex cholesterol levels in each statin group compared with the control group, but significant differences were only observed in pravastatin- and simvastatin-treated mice. In addition, changes in expression levels for genes directly involved in the cholesterol synthesis pathway did not meet the criteria for significant changes in expression levels (data not shown). Statins altered the expression of many genes with potentially protective effects (e.g., Arhu, Enc1, Cotl1, and Igfbp3). Arhu, Enc1, and Cotl1 are genes involved in actin function and whose expression levels were significantly increased by one, two, or all of the statins. Enc1 is a mammalian Kelch-related gene highly expressed in brain that encodes an actin-binding protein (Hernandez et al., 1997). Arhu is a novel gene that encodes a homolog of the Rho family of GTPases (Tao et al., 2001) and is involved with actin cytoskeleton organization (de Hostos et al., 1993). Igfbp3 encodes a protein reported to be the primary carrier for insulin-like growth factors (IGF), IGF-1 and IGF-II which are expressed in several cell types including astrocytes and neurons (Lee et al., 1997). There is a growing body of data linking the role of insulin and IGF-1 to AD (Gasparini and Xu, 2003). IGF-1 has been reported to have a neuroprotective effect by regulating A and its clearance from the brain (Carro et al., 2002). It would seem that increased expression of the IGFBP3 protein that transports IGF-1 would be beneficial to brain cell function. Furthermore, IGFBP3 has been linked to humanin, a newly identified protein capable of rescuing neurons from A toxicity (Ikonen et al., 2003). IGFBP3 levels were elevated in AD brains and incubation of cultured human brain pericytes with A_1-40 increased IGFBP3 mRNA levels (Rensink et al., 2002). Whether the elevation in IGFBP3 levels of AD brains is indicative of inducing neurodegeneration or inhibiting a neuronal insult is not understood.

Expression levels of specific genes associated with apoptosis (Bcl-2, c-fos, H1.2, and c-myc) were altered primarily by simvastatin. With respect to these four genes, lovastatin only significantly increased expression of c-myc, and pravastatin increased expression but the change was not significant. Simvastatin significantly increased expression of the major antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2. This gene encodes a protein apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 that has been shown to suppress apoptosis in different cell types (Adams and Cory, 1998). Increased expression of Bcl-2 is interesting because the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax has been proposed to be important in the regulation of apoptosis (Adams and Cory, 1998). Overexpression of Bcl-2 in transgenic mice protected neurons from ischemic insult (Martinou et al., 1994), and Bcl-2 can serve as a compensatory mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases to combat reactive oxygen species-induced cell damage (Migheli et al., 1994). Several different lines of evidence indicate that Bcl-2 may play a role in AD. Neurons exhibiting neurofibrillary tangle formation were found to have reduced Bcl-2 levels, however, astrocytes had increased Bcl-2 levels as determined by immunohistochemical staining (Satou et al., 1995). The effect seen in astrocytes may be due to a role in damage repair. Both lovastatin and pravastatin increased Bcl-2 gene expression by 1.75- and 3.8-fold, respectively, but within-group variability negated statistically significant differences compared with control expression. A recent article demonstrated that Bcl-w, a member of the Bcl-2 family, was neuroprotective against staurosporine and amyloid -protein-induced apoptosis in a human neuroblastoma cell line (Zhu et al., 2004). Increased protein levels of Bcl-w were observed in the brain of AD individuals compared with age-matched controls (Zhu et al., 2004). Clearly, an up-regulation of Bcl-2 and other genes and proteins in this family could provide enhanced neuronal protection against neurotoxic events and possibly prevent or perhaps delay the neurodegeneration associated with AD. Statins may have neuroprotective effects. However, it has been reported that statins induced apoptosis in neuroblasts, glioma cell lines, and rat primary neurons (García-Román et al., 2001; Murakami et al., 2001; Meske et al., 2003). Protein levels of Bcl-2 were significantly lower in neuroblasts that had been incubated with lovastatin for 24 h (García-Román et al., 2001). The in vitro studies used statin concentrations that were several orders of magnitude higher than concentrations used in the present in vivo study. Also, it has not been reported whether statins administered in vivo induce apoptosis in the brain. In view of the potential efficacy of statins in reducing the prevalence of AD, much more work is needed to understand the pharmacological actions of statins in the brain.

We determined statin levels in the cerebral cortex using LC/MS/MS and report the novel findings that pravastatin was detected in the brain at levels above the IC₅₀ for inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase activity (Bischoff and Heller, 1998) and that statin levels declined quickly in brain. Lovastatin and simvastatin also were detected in the cerebral cortex. Detecting pravastatin in the brain at the levels observed was surprising because it is thought that little if any pravastatin crosses the blood-brain barrier (Botti et al., 1991). Lovastatin and simvastatin administered as hydrophobic lactones readily cross the blood-brain barrier. Pravastatin is a hydrophilic drug with a very low octanol/buffer coefficient of -0.47 (log D_7.0) compared with lovastatin 3.9 and simvastatin 4.8 (Ishigami et al., 2001). Pravastatin, however, is associated with reduced risk of developing AD, alters the transbilayer distribution of cholesterol in synaptic plasma membranes of chronically treated mice (Kirsch et al., 2003), and as we now show, modifies gene expression in mouse cerebral cortex. One interpretation of our findings with pravastatin is that effects of the drug are occurring outside of the brain, and those effects in turn alter brain gene expression. Arguing against that possibility are several lines of evidence. Pravastatin-treated mice showed a small but significant decrease in cerebral cortex cholesterol levels. Cholesterol levels in brain and in serum outside of the brain are not in equilibrium. Outside of the brain it is well established that statin-induced inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase reduces mevalonate levels leading to a reduction in the sterol regulatory pool that results in up-regulation of HMG-CoA reductase. We found that HMG-CoA reductase brain gene expression was increased in pravastatin-treated mice (1.08-fold increase) but that change did not meet our criteria for significant gene expression. In addition, although pravastatin was not detected in brain after 24 h following statin administration, it was detected after 1, 3, and 6 h; therefore, a key question pertains to mechanisms transporting pravastatin into the brain. There are two potential mechanisms for pravastatin transport: simple membrane partitioning or active transport. Membrane partitioning of pravastatin acid is unlikely due to its hydrophilicity and an octanol/buffer partition coefficient of -0.47; however, pravastatin can be transported into cells by active transport. Organic anion transporters (OATs) have been identified that transport pravastatin and are expressed in the brain (Kusuhara et al., 1999; Takeda et al., 2004). Another transporter that shuttles statin acids and is expressed in the brain is the monocarboxylic acid transporter MCT2 (Tsuji et al., 1993). Importantly, we found that pravastatin, along with lovastatin and simvastatin, significantly increased MCT2 gene expression.

Brain levels of the three statins rapidly declined between 1 and 6 h as shown in Fig. 2 and could be due to transport out of the brain or metabolism. The OATs described above can also transport acids out of cells, and it has been reported that OATs are involved in the excretion of both endogenous and exogenous acids (Kusuhara et al., 1999). An additional transporter is P-glycoprotein that has been identified in brain (Hirrlinger et al., 2002). There is evidence that statins are substrates for P-glycoprotein and that this transporter may play a role in statin efflux from cells (Bogman et al., 2001). An alternative hypothesis is that statins are rapidly metabolized in brain. Statin metabolism has not been studied in brain but data have been reported for serum half-lives in human subjects (Jones et al., 1998). For example, simvastatin lactone and acid have half-lives of between 2.2 to 3.1 and 3.2 to 4.4 h, respectively. The reduction in simvastatin levels in the cerebral cortex was most notable between 1 and 3 h postadministration (Fig. 2), and it is certainly plausible that statin metabolism could occur in brain. Active transport as well as metabolism may be responsible for the rapid decline in drug statin levels observed between 1 and 6 h following statin administration.

We report the novel findings that the hydrophobic statins lovastatin and simvastatin and the hydrophilic statin pravastatin had pleiotropic effects on gene expression in mouse cerebral cortex and that levels of the three statins were detected in brain. Surprisingly, the genes directly involved in cholesterol synthesis were relatively unaffected by statin treatment when our selection criteria was applied, and cholesterol levels were only slightly lowered. These findings, along with the many potentially protective genes that were changed, suggest that the neuroprotective effects of statins are largely cholesterol-independent. Moreover, these results provide new insight into possible mechanisms for the efficacy of statins in reducing the prevalence of AD and lay the foundation for future studies.

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank Dr. Sabita Roy and Jennifer Kelschenbach for advice on RT-PCR.

	Footnotes

 
Supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging grants North Atlantic Treaty Organization Collaborative Linkage Grant (980136), Alzheimer Forschung Initiative (02806), Hirnliga, Hanna Bragard Foundation, and the Medical Research Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Data analysis was accomplished using the resources of the Supercomputing Institute for Digital Simulation and Advanced Computation, University of Minnesota.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.104.075028.

ABBREVIATIONS: AD, Alzheimer's disease; A, amyloid -protein; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A; LC/MS/MS, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction(s); psig, pounds per square inch gauge pressure; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; OATs, organic anion transporters.

Address correspondence to: Dr. W. Gibson Wood, VA Medical Center, One Veterans Drive, GRECC 11G, Minneapolis, MN 55417. E-mail: woodx002{at}umn.edu

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

Adams JM and Cory S (1998) The Bcl-2 protein family: arbiters of cell survival. Science (Wash DC) 281: 1322-1325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Akhtar RS, Ness JM, and Roth KA (2004) Bcl-2 family regulation of neuronal development and neurodegeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1644: 189-203.[Medline]

Bischoff H and Heller AH (1998) Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of cerivastatin. Am J Cardiol 82: 18J-25J.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bogman K, Peyer A-K, Török M, Küsters E, and Drewe J (2001) HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and P-glycoprotein modulation. Br J Pharmacol 132: 1183-1192.[CrossRef][Medline]

Botti RE, Triscari J, Pan HY, and Zayat J (1991) Concentrations of pravastatin and lovastatin in cerebrospinal fluid in healthy subjects. Clin Neuropharmacol 14: 256-261.[Medline]

Butterfield DA (2002) Amyloid beta-peptide (1-42)-induced oxidative stress and neurotoxicity: implications for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease brain. A review. Free Radic Res 36: 1307-1313.[CrossRef][Medline]

Carro E, Trejo JL, Gomez-Isla T, LeRoith D, and Torres-Aleman I (2002) Serum insulin-like growth factor I regulates brain amyloid-beta levels. Nat Med 8: 1390-1397.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen J, Zhang ZG, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Jiang H, Zhang C, Lu M, Katakowski M, Feldkamp CS, et al. (2003) Statins induce angiogenesis, neurogenesis and synaptogenesis after stroke. Ann Neurol 53: 743-751.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Hostos EL, Bradtke B, Lottspeich F, and Gerisch G (1993) Coactosin, a 17 kDa F-actin binding protein from Dictyostelium discoideum. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 26: 181-191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eckert GP, Kirsch C, and Müller WE (2001) Differential effects of lovastatin treatment on brain cholesterol levels in normal and apoE deficient mice. Neuroreport 12: 883-887.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ferguson AV and Samson WK (2003) The orexin/hypocretin system: a critical regulator of neuroendocrine and autonomic function. Front Neuroendocrinol 24: 141-150.[CrossRef][Medline]

García-Román N, Álvarez AM, Toro MJ, Montes A, and Lorenzo MJ (2001) Lovastatin induces apoptosis of spontaneously immortalized rat brain neuroblasts: involvement of nonsterol isoprenoid biosynthesis inhibition. Mol Cell Neurosci 17: 329-341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gasparini L and Xu H (2003) Potential roles of insulin and IGF-1 in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci 26: 404-406.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hernandez MC, Andres-Barquin PJ, Martinez S, Bulfone A, Rubenstein JL, and Israel MA (1997) ENC-1: a novel mammalian kelch-related gene specifically expressed in the nervous system encodes an actin-binding protein. J Neurosci 17: 3038-3051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirrlinger J, Konig J, and Dringen R (2002) Expression of mRNAs of multidrug resistance proteins (Mrps) in cultured rat astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglial cells and neurons. J Neurochem 82: 716-729.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ikonen M, Liu B, Hashimoto Y, Ma L, Lee K-W, Niikura T, and Nishimoto I (2003) Interaction between the Alzheimer's survival peptide humanin and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 regulates cell survival and apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 13042-13047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ishigami M, Honda T, Takasaki W, Ikeda T, Komai T, Ito K, and Sugiyama Y (2001) A comparison of the effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors on the CYP3A4-dependent oxidation of mexazolam in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos 29: 282-288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, Seshadri S, and Drachman DA (2000) Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet 356: 1627-1631.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, and Hunninghake D (1998) Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES study). Am J Cardiol 81: 582-587.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kirsch C, Eckert GP, and Müller WE (2003) Statin effects on cholesterol microdomains in brain plasma membranes. Biochem Pharmacol 65: 843-856.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kusuhara H, Sekine T, Utsunomiya-Tate N, Tsuda M, Kojima R, Cha SH, Sugiyama Y, Kanai Y, and Endou H (1999) Molecular cloning and characterization of a new multispecific organic anion transporter from rat brain. J Biol Chem 274: 13675-13680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Law MR, Wald NJ, and Rudnicka AR (2003) Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 326: 1-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee WH, Wang GM, Yang XL, Seaman LB, and Vannucci SI (1997) Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia decreased neuronal but increased cerebral vascular endothelial IGFBP3 expression. J Neurosci Res 50: 721-728.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martel JC, Alagar R, Robitaille Y, and Quirion R (1990) Neuropeptide Y receptor binding sites in human brain. Possible alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res 519: 228-235.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martinou JC, Dubois-Dauphin M, Stable JK, Rodriguez I, Frankowski H, Missotten M, Albertini P, Talabot D, Catsicas S, and Pietra C (1994) Overexpression of bcl-2 in transgenic mice protects neurons from naturally occurring cell death and experimental ischemia. Neuron 13: 1017-1030.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meske V, Albert F, Richter D, Schwarze J, and Ohm TG (2003) Blockade of HMG-CoA reductase activity causes changes in microtubule-stabilizing protein tau via suppression of geranylgeranylpyrophosphate formation: implications for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurosci 17: 93-102.[CrossRef][Medline]

Migheli A, Cavalla P, Piva R, Giordana MT, and Schiffer D (1994) Bcl-2 protein expression in aged brain and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroreport 5: 1906-1908.[Medline]

Murakami M, Goto T, Saito Y, Goto S, Kochi M, and Ushio Y (2001) The inhibitory effect of simvastatin on growth in malignant gliomas—with special reference to its local application with fibrin glue spray in vivo. Int J Oncol 19: 525-531.[Medline]

Nagasawa K, Nagi K, Sumitani Y, Moriya Y, Muraki Y, Takara K, Ohnishi N, Yokoyama T, and Fujimoto S (2002) Monocarboxylate transporter mediates uptake of lovastatin acid in rat cultured mesangial cells. J Pharm Sci 91: 2605-2613.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nilsson CL, Brinkmalm A, Minthon L, Blennow K, and Ekman R (2001) Processing of neuropeptide Y, galanin and somatostatin in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Peptides 22: 2105-2112.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rensink AA, Gellekink H, Otte-Höller I, ten Donkelaar HJ, de Waal RM, Verbeek MM, and Kremer B (2002) Expression of the cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor and pro-apoptotic insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol 104: 525-533.[Medline]

Rockwood K, Kirkland S, Hogan DB, MacKnight C, Merry H, Verreault R, Wolfson C, and McDowell I (2002) Use of lipid-lowering agents, indication bias and the risk of dementia in community-dwelling elderly people. Arch Neurol 59: 223-227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Satou T, Cummings B, and Cotman C (1995) Immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 protein within neurons in the Alzheimer's disease brain increases with disease severity. Brain Res 697: 35-43.[CrossRef][Medline]

Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, St. George-Hyslop PH, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo SH, Rosi BL, Gusella JF, Crapper-Maclachlan DR, Alberts MJ, et al. (1993) Association of apolipoprotein E allele E4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 43: 1467-1472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schuhmacher M, Kohlhuber F, Holzel M, Kaiser C, Burtscher H, Jarsch M, Bornkamm GW, Laux G, Pollack A, and Weidle UH (2001) The transcriptional program of a human B cell line in response to Myc. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 397-406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takeda M, Noshiro R, Onazato ML, Tojo A, Hasannejad H, Huang X-L, Narikawa S, and Endou H (2004) Evidence for a role of human organic anion transporters in the muscular side effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol 483: 133-138.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tao W, Pennica D, Xu L, Kalejta RF, and Levine AJ (2001) Wrch-1, a novel member of the Rho gene family that is regulated by Wnt-1. Genes Dev 15: 1796-1807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tsuji A, Saheki A, Tamai I, and Terasaki T (1993) Transport mechanism of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors at the blood-brain barrier. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: 1085-1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walter L and Stella N (2003) Endothelin-1 increases 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) production in astrocytes. Glia 44: 85-90.[CrossRef][Medline]

Werner N, Nickenig G, and Laufs U (2002) Pleiotropic effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Basic Res Cardiol 97: 105-116.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wolozin B (2004) Cholesterol and the biology of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron 41: 7-10.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wolozin B, Kellman W, Ruosseau P, Celesia GG, and Siegel G (2000) Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arch Neurol 57: 1439-1443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wood WG, Eckert GP, Igbavboa U, and Müller WE (2003) Amyloid beta-peptide interactions with membranes and cholesterol: causes or casualties of Alzheimer's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1610: 281-290.[Medline]

Zacco A, Togo J, Spence K, Ellis A, Lloyd D, Furlong S, and Piser T (2003) 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors protect cortical neurons from excitotoxicity. J Neurosci 23: 11104-11111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu X, Wang Y, Ogawa O, Lee H-G, Raina AK, Siedlak SL, Harris PLR, Fujioka H, Shimohama S, Tabaton M, et al. (2004) Neuroprotective properties of Bcl-w in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem 89: 1233-1240.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Ostrowski, B. L. Wilkinson, T. E. Golde, and G. Landreth Statins Reduce Amyloid-beta Production through Inhibition of Protein Isoprenylation J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 26832 - 26844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shankaran, C. King, J. Lee, R. Busch, M. Wolff, and M. K. Hellerstein Discovery of Novel Hippocampal Neurogenic Agents by Using an in Vivo Stable Isotope Labeling Technique J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1172 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Thelen, K. M. Rentsch, U. Gutteck, M. Heverin, M. Olin, U. Andersson, A. von Eckardstein, I. Bjorkhem, and D. Lutjohann Brain Cholesterol Synthesis in Mice Is Affected by High Dose of Simvastatin but Not of Pravastatin J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1146 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Paintlia, M. K. Paintlia, M. Khan, T. Vollmer, A. K. Singh, and I. Singh HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor augments survival and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitors in animal model of multiple sclerosis FASEB J, September 1, 2005; 19(11): 1407 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.104.075028v1 312/2/786    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson-Anuna, L. N. Articles by Wood, W. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson-Anuna, L. N. Articles by Wood, W. G.