![]() |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GASTROINTESTINAL, HEPATIC, PULMONARY, AND RENAL
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California (F.J.E., J.C.-H.H., K.L., A.G.L.); Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.S.); and Department of Physical Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, California (M.T.G.)
Received July 28, 2004; accepted September 14, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we investigated the mechanism for the ileal-selective antimuscarinic action of p-FHHSiD. As reported by Eglen et al. (1990
), we found that p-FHHSiD exhibited greater potency at blocking muscarinic agonist-induced contractions of the ileum compared with those of the trachea. Resultant analysis showed that only part of its inhibitory effect in the ileum could be attributed to competitive antagonism, whereas all of its effect in the trachea was competitive. There was little difference in the competitive component of p-FHHSiD for inhibiting contractions in the ileum and trachea. We also observed no difference in the potency of p-FHHSiD for antagonizing muscarinic agonist-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis in bovine trachea and guinea pig ileum. Our results suggest that p-FHHSiD does not discriminate markedly between M3 muscarinic receptors eliciting contraction and phosphoinositide hydrolysis in ileum and trachea but that it may exhibit a more potent, nonmuscarinic receptor-mediated inhibitory effect in the ileum.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis. Whole trachea from steer were obtained from a slaughterhouse (Shamrock Meats, Vernon, CA) and transported to the laboratory on ice. Slices of tracheal smooth muscle were prepared and placed in KRB buffer as described previously (Ostrom and Ehlert, 1998
). The longitudinal muscle of the guinea pig ileum was isolated as described by Paton and Vizi (1969
). The tissue was cross-chopped at 90° and 350 µm using a MacIlwaine tissue chopper. The slices were washed three times in warm (37°C) KRB buffer gassed with O2/CO2 (19:1) and allowed to equilibrate at 37°C. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured using a technique similar to that described previously (Thomas et al., 1993
). Our method incorporates the [3H]inositol labeling and ion exchange method of Berridge et al. (1982
) and the perchloric acid extraction method of Kendall and Hill (1990
). Tissue slices were incubated with [3H]inositol (200 µCi) for 90 min in a final volume of 10 ml of KRB buffer. Aliquots (50 µl) of sedimented tissue slices were incubated with the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-M in a final volume of 0.3 ml containing KRB buffer. The incubations were carried out in plastic tubes gassed with O2/CO2 (19:1) and capped. The slices were first incubated in the presence of oxotremorine-M or oxotremorine-M and p-FHHSiD for 30 min to allow these drugs to reach equilibrium with muscarinic receptors in the presence of each other. Control experiments showed little increase in [3H]inositolphosphates in the absence of LiCl during this time. After this equilibration phase, an aliquot of LiCl (3 µl) was added to achieve a final concentration of 10 mM, and the incubation was allowed to proceed for another 30 min. The incubations were stopped by the addition of an aliquot (200 µl) of perchloric acid [5% (w/v)], and the tubes were placed on ice for approximately 15 min. An aliquot (approximately 200 µl) containing KOH (0.525 M) and Tris base (10 mM) was added to precipitate the perchlorate, and the tubes were allowed to stand on ice for 15 min, but no longer. The tubes were centrifuged at approximately 3000g for 10 min, and most of the supernatant (0.6 ml) was removed and transferred to a tube containing 2.4 ml of 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4. The entire 3-ml extract was applied to an ion exchange column consisting of 1 ml of Dowex AG1 x 8 (100200 mesh). The column was washed four times with 5 ml of water each time. [3H]Inositolphosphates were eluted from the column and collected directly into scintillation vials with 2.5 ml of 1 M ammonium formate and 0.1 M formic acid. The data were expressed as [3H]inositolphosphates (cpm).
Calculations. The EC50 and Emax (maximal response) values of oxotremorine-M were estimated by fitting an increasing logistic equation to the concentration-response curves for contraction or phosphoinositide hydrolysis as described previously (Candell et al., 1990
). Two different methods were used to estimate the dissociation constant (KB) of p-FHHSiD, based on its ability to antagonize oxotremorine-M-induced responses. The first method rests on the assumption that the entire effect of p-FHHSiD is caused by competitive antagonism of the agonistic effect of oxotremorine-M at muscarinic receptors. In this instance, the KB value is calculated according to the method of Schild (Arunlakshana and Schild, 1959
):
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
In some experiments, the ability of p-FHHSiD to inhibit the contractile action of histamine was investigated, and a decrease in both Emax and potency (increase in EC50) was noted in the ileum. In this circumstance, we tested whether the effect of p-FHHSiD could be described empirically as a reduction in agonist efficacy using a procedure described previously (Ostrom and Ehlert, 1997
). We refer to the apparent decrease in agonist efficacy as a decrease in observed coupling efficiency. We make no conclusions regarding agonist efficacy; we simply use the technique as an empirical method to convert the inhibitory effects on the two disparate parameters, EC50 and Emax, into common currency.
Reagents. Reagents were obtained from the following sources: oxotremorine-M and p-FHHSiD (Sigma/RBI, Natick, MA); atropine and indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), and [3H]inositol (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA). 4-DAMP was synthesized as described by Barlow et al. (1976
).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The estimation of the KB value of p-FHHSiD in eq. 1 is based on the assumption that p-FHHSiD acts solely through competitive antagonism of the muscarinic receptor mediating contraction. To determine whether an additional nonreceptor-mediated inhibitory effect of p-FHHSiD might skew the estimate of its KB value, we used resultant analysis to estimate the true KB value of p-FHHSiD. With this method, it is possible to distinguish between a competitive effect of an antagonist and a possible nonreceptor-mediated effect on the stimulus-response function (e.g., contractile mechanism). The method involves comparing the extent of antagonism caused by a known competitive inhibitor, like atropine, in the presence of the test compound p-FHHSiD with that observed in its absence. Resultant analysis of the inhibitory effect of p-FHHSiD is shown in Fig. 2.
In the absence of p-FHHSiD, atropine (10 nM) shifted the concentration-response curve of oxotremorine-M to the right about 5.9-fold in the ileum (Fig. 2a). Similar effects were observed in the trachea (Fig. 2b). The estimates of the pKB values of atropine in the ileum and trachea were 8.70 ± 0.044 and 9.22 ± 0.039, respectively. The ability of atropine to shift the concentration-response of oxotremorine-M curve was also measured in the presence of two concentrations of p-FHHSiD. In the ileum, the atropine-induced increases in the EC50 value of oxotremorine-M at low (0.03 µM) and high (0.1 µM) concentrations of p-FHHSiD were 4.1- and 2.6-fold, respectively (Fig. 2c). Using eq. 2, it is possible to estimate the true KB value of p-FHHSiD based on its ability to interfere with the competitive antagonism caused by atropine. These estimates of the resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD were 7.17 ± 0.20 and 7.25 ± 0.11 when calculated at concentrations of 0.03 and 0.1 µM, respectively, in the presence of atropine (10 nM) in the ileum. These resultant pKB values are listed in Table 1. It can be seen that there is little difference between these estimates made at the two concentrations of p-FHHSiD in the ileum, and the average value was estimated at 7.21 ± 0.14. Similar experiments were run in the trachea (Fig. 2d), except that higher concentrations of p-FHHSiD were used. In the trachea, the atropine-induced increases in the EC50 value of oxotremorine-M at low (0.3 µM) and high (1.0 µM) concentrations of p-FHHSiD were 9.4- and 4.3-fold, respectively. There was little difference between the corresponding resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD in the trachea, and these were calculated to be 6.71 ± 0.21 and 6.82 ± 0.076, respectively, with the average estimate being 6.76 ± 0.14. Table 1 summarizes resultant analysis. It can be seen that, in the ileum, the resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD are significantly smaller (lower potency) than the corresponding observed pKB values estimated using the simple competitive model. In contrast, there is little difference between the observed and resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD in the trachea. Although the average estimate of the resultant pKB value of p-FHHSiD in the ileum (pKB = 7.21) was greater than that observed in the trachea (pKB = 6.76), the difference in potency was only 2.8-fold and not quite significant (P = 0.067) in contrast to the larger, highly significant 11.5-fold difference between the observed KB values in the two tissues. This similarity in resultant pKB values between the two tissues indicates that the true potency of p-FHHSiD for competitively antagonizing muscarinic receptors eliciting contraction in the ileum and trachea is similar, but perhaps not identical. Also, the data suggest that the majority of the differential blocking effect of p-FHHSiD in ileum and trachea (i.e., 11.5-fold difference in observed pKB values) is due to a mechanism not directly related to competitive antagonism of muscarinic receptors.
To validate our approach in the ileum, we used resultant analysis to analyze the interaction between atropine and another known competitive antagonist, 4-DAMP (Fig. 3). We expected that in this situation, there should be little or no difference between the simple competitive estimate of the pKB of 4-DAMP and that measured by resultant analysis. At concentrations of 3 and 10 nM, 4-DAMP shifted the oxotremorine-M concentration-response curve to the right 5.5- and 14-fold, respectively (Fig. 3a), yielding simple pKB values estimated assuming a competitive model (eq. 1 of 9.17 and 9.09; Table 2). In these experiments, atropine (10 nM) shifted the oxotremorine-M concentration-response curve to the right 12-fold (Fig. 3b), which yields a pKB estimate of 9.04. In the presence of atropine (10 nM), the shifts in the oxotremorine-M concentration-response curve cause by 4-DAMP at 3 and 10 nM were 3.6- and 1.9-fold, respectively (Fig. 3, c and d). Resultant analysis yielded true pKB values of 9.04 and 9.15, respectively, for the effects of the two concentrations of 4-DAMP used in the presence of atropine. The pKB values of 4-DAMP calculated using the simple equation for competitive inhibition (eq. 1) are similar to those for resultant analysis (eq. 2). These results are consistent with the idea that both 4-DAMP and atropine inhibit the contractile effects of oxotremorine-M solely through a competitive mechanism.
|
|
As suggested above, the discrepancy between the observed and resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD in the ileum may be explained by an inhibitory mechanism distinct from antagonism of muscarinic receptors. To explore this hypothesis, we measured the effects of p-FHHSiD on the contractile response to a nonmuscarinic contractile agent (i.e., histamine) in the ileum and trachea. When tested in the ileum, p-FHHSiD (0.3 µM) caused a 1.5-fold increase in the EC50 value of histamine and 6% decrease in the maximal response (Fig. 4a). At a concentration of 1 µM, p-FHHSiD caused a 1.9-fold increase in the EC50 value of histamine and 34% decrease in the maximal response. These decreases in the contractile action of histamine at 0.3 µM and 1.0 µM p-FHHSiD are equivalent to those caused by 39 and 70% decreases, respectively, in the observed coupling efficiency of histamine receptors in the ileum. This decrease in the activity of histamine was significant at both the low (0.3 µM; P = 0.027) and high (1.0 µM; P = 0.044) concentrations of p-FHHSiD. In contrast, the same concentrations of p-FHHSiD had no significant effect on contractions elicited to histamine in the trachea (Fig. 4b). The results indicate that, in the concentration range of 0.3 to 1.0 µM, p-FHHSiD inhibits the contractile effects of histamine in the ileum, but not in the trachea.
The relatively small, 2.8-fold difference between the resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD in ileum and trachea suggests a small difference in the potency of p-FHHSiD for antagonizing muscarinic receptors eliciting contraction in the two tissues. Such a difference might be attributed to a greater contribution of the M2 muscarinic receptor to contraction in the trachea compared with the ileum, because p-FHHSiD exhibits approximately 16-fold higher binding affinity for M3 receptors compared with M2 (Esqueda et al., 1996
). Consequently, we wondered whether another muscarinic antagonist with comparable selectivity for M3 receptors over M2 might exhibit a similar preference for the ileum relative to trachea. To test this idea, we measured the competitive antagonism of oxotremorine-M-induced contractions by 4-DAMP in ileum and trachea. 4-DAMP exhibits 10-fold higher binding affinity for human M3 muscarinic receptors (pKD = 8.81) expressed in CHO cells compared with human M2 receptors (pKD = 7.87) (Griffin et al., 2004
). At a concentration of 10 nM, 4-DAMP caused similar shifts (10.2- and 15.9-fold) in the oxotremorine-M concentration-response curve in ileum and trachea, respectively. These results yielded pKB values of 8.96 ± 0.12 and 9.17 ± 0.05 in ileum (n = 4) and trachea (n = 3), respectively. There was no significant difference between the pKB values of 4-DAMP in ileum and trachea (P = 0.16). The pKB values estimated for 4-DAMP from the data just described as well as those in Fig. 3 are similar to the binding affinity of 4-DAMP estimated at human M3 muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO cells (pKD = 8.81), but not with that estimated at human M2 muscarinic receptors (pKD = 7.87) (Griffin et al., 2004
). In these latter assays, binding was measured in a modified KRB buffer similar to that used in the present study.
Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis. Since muscarinic agonist-induced contractions represent a complicated response involving several steps and perhaps more than one muscarinic receptor subtype, we were interested in examining the inhibitory effects of p-FHHSiD on a simpler response more closely coupled to the M3 muscarinic receptor in the ileum and trachea. Using this approach, it seemed more likely that the inhibitory effect of p-FHHSiD would be confined to competitive antagonism of a single receptor subtype, i.e., the M3. Consequently, we measured the ability of p-FHHSiD to inhibit oxotremorine-M-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in slices of the bovine trachea and longitudinal muscle of the guinea pig ileum. Since the tracheal smooth muscle from the guinea pig is too small to provide an adequate source of tissue, we used the cow as a source of trachea for these experiments. As shown in Fig. 5, oxotremorine-M caused a concentration-dependent increase in phosphoinositide hydrolysis in both ileum and trachea with the maximal effect being 36,000 ± 3000 and 35,000 ± 9400 cpm, respectively, when expressed as cpm of [3H]inositolphosphates. The pEC50 values of oxotremorine-M in these two tissues were 5.18 ± 0.11 and 5.96 ± 0.15, respectively. At a concentration of 1 µM, p-FHHSiD shifted the concentration-response curve of oxotremorine-M to the right 13.0- and 12.6-fold in ileum and trachea, respectively. The pKB values of p-FHHSiD were estimated from these shifts, and these values are listed in Table 1. The pKB estimates in the ileum 7.08 ± 0.046 and trachea 7.06 ± 0.12 are the same.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several possibilities have been suggested for the mechanism of the tissue selective effect of p-FHHSiD, including pharmacokinetic (i.e., uptake process for p-FHHSiD) as well as pharmacodynamic (i.e., tissue differences in M3 muscarinic receptors) explanations (Eglen et al., 1990
). To address the latter possibility, we investigated the effects of p-FHHSiD on oxotremorine-M-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in bovine trachea and guinea pig ileum. We used bovine trachea because the guinea pig trachea is too small to measure phosphoinositide hydrolysis feasibly. Competitive antagonism studies have shown that the phosphoinositide hydrolysis is mediated by the M3 muscarinic receptor in ileum (Candell et al., 1990
) and trachea (Roffel et al., 1990
). We found that p-FHHSiD exhibited similar potency for blocking muscarinic receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the ileum and trachea. Thus, these data show that p-FHHSiD does not discriminate between M3 muscarinic receptors in guinea pig ileum and bovine trachea. This observation is highly relevant because it is thought that the M3 receptor mediates contraction directly in guinea pig ileum and trachea (for reviews, see Eglen et al., 1996
; Ehlert et al., 1997
). It is conceivable that p-FHHSiD might exhibit different affinities for bovine and guinea pig tracheal M3 receptors; however, the agreement between the observed pKB value for phosphoinositide hydrolysis in bovine trachea and the observed and true pKB values for antagonizing contraction in the guinea pig trachea argues against this possibility.
Since both M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors have a contractile role in smooth muscle (for review, see Ehlert, 2003
), and since p-FHHSiD exhibits approximately 16-fold higher affinity for M3 muscarinic receptors over M2 (Esqueda et al., 1996
), it might seem that a greater contribution of the M2 receptor to contraction in the trachea could explain the ileal selectivity of p-FHHSiD relative to trachea. However, we found that another muscarinic antagonist (4-DAMP) with 10-fold higher affinity for M3 receptors over M2 lacked ileal selectivity, which provides no support for the latter hypothesis. Studies on ileum and trachea from muscarinic receptor knockout mice have shown a large loss of muscarinic contractile function in M3 knockout mice, a small loss of function in M2 knockout mice, and a complete loss of function in M2/M3 double knockout mice (Matsui et al., 2000
, 2002
; Stengel et al., 2000
, 2002
). Nevertheless, the relatively small M2 receptor-mediated contractions observed in M3 receptor knockout mice are greater in trachea (Stengel et al., 2002
) compared with ileum (Matsui et al., 2000
), suggesting a greater role for the M2 receptor in the trachea. In guinea pig, M2 muscarinic receptors have been shown to mediate a high potency inhibition of the relaxant effects of agents that increase cAMP (Thomas et al., 1993
) and a low potency enhancement in M3 receptor-mediated contractions (Sawyer and Ehlert, 1999
). However, these latter mechanisms are ultimately contingent upon Ca2+ mobilization by another receptor, like the M3. It has been shown that the competitive inhibition of this type of receptor interaction has a tendency to resemble the pharmacological profile of the directly acting receptor (i.e., M3) and not that of the conditionally acting receptor (i.e., M2) (Ehlert et al., 1999
; Sawyer and Ehlert, 1999
; Ehlert, 2003
). Thus, the ileal selectivity of p-FHHSiD relative to trachea cannot be explained by the differential contribution of the M2 receptor to contraction.
Perhaps the strongest data to suggest an alternative mechanism for the tissue-selective effects is shown in Fig. 6, which shows a histogram of the binding affinities of p-FHHSiD at human recombinant M2 and M3 receptors plotted together with the pKB values estimated by different methods in functional assays on the guinea pig ileum and guinea pig and bovine trachea. The binding affinities were measured in a prior study (Esqueda et al., 1996
) using a modified KRB buffer nearly identical to that used for the contractile assays of this study. It can be seen that p-FHHSiD has approximately 16-fold higher binding affinity for M3 receptors (pKD = 7.30) compared with M2 (pKD = 6.09). Moreover, its binding affinities (pKD values) for M1 (7.08), M4 (7.08), and M5 (6.26) receptors are in between those shown for M2 and M3 receptors in Fig. 6 (Esqueda et al., 1996
). Surprisingly, its observed pKB value for antagonizing oxotremorine-M-mediated contractions in the ileum exceeds its binding affinity for the M3 receptor as well as any known muscarinic subtype by at least 4.5-fold. In contrast, its observed pKB value for blocking contractions in the trachea is nearly the same as its binding affinity at the M3 receptor. If the tissue selective action of p-FHHSiD were caused by a differential contribution of the M2 receptor to contraction, then one would expect the observed pKB values to vary across tissues within a range bounded by the high affinity M3 pKD and the low affinity M2 pKD. However, as just described, the observed pKB in the ileum exceeds this range, which strongly suggests an alternative, nonmuscarinic receptor mechanism. In contrast, the resultant pKB values of p-FHHSiD in the ileum and trachea are similar to its binding affinity at the M3 receptor, which is consistent with the well known direct role that the M3 receptor plays in contraction in these tissues. Moreover, the pKB values of p-FHHSiD for antagonizing oxotremorine-M-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis are also in agreement with the binding affinity observed at M3 receptors. Collectively, the data show that p-FHHSiD does not discriminate markedly between M3 muscarinic receptors in the ileum and trachea.
|
Although our data show little difference between the binding affinity of p-FHHSiD for recombinant M3 receptors and its resultant pKB values in ileum and trachea, we did observe that the resultant pKB value of p-FHHSiD in the ileum was 2.8-fold greater than that observed in the trachea, although the difference was not quite significant (P = 0.067). This modest difference in resultant pKB values cannot entirely explain the relatively large, ileal selectivity of p-FHHSiD relative to trachea.
Resultant analysis is an ingenious method for estimating the dissociation constant of an antagonist in situations where the antagonist has at least two actions: competitive antagonism at the receptor and some other nonreceptor-mediated effect. Our observation that the observed pKB value of p-FHHSiD in the ileum (7.95) exceeds its corresponding resultant pKB value (7.21) by a 5.5-fold difference in potency suggests that p-FHHSiD may possess an alternative, inhibitory mechanism on muscarinic agonist-induced contractions of the ileum distinct from competitive antagonism of M3 receptors. Accordingly, we noted that p-FHHSiD caused a moderate inhibition of histamine-induced contractions of the ileum in the concentration range of 0.3 to 1.0 µM, while having no effect on histamine-induced contractions of the trachea. This inhibitory effect on the ileum was substantial at 1 µM, equivalent to that caused by a 70% reduction in the intrinsic efficacy of histamine. However, we were unable to demonstrate an inhibitory effect on histamine-induced contractions of the ileum in the low concentration range (0.030.1 µM) where an ileal-selective, antimuscarinic action of p-FHHSiD is apparent.
In considering the actions of p-FHHSiD, it is important to note that the compound contains a chiral silicon atom. Homologous compounds with a similar chiral center, but lacking the Si-O bond, often exhibit a large difference in the antimuscarinic effects of the enantiomers (Tacke et al., 1995
, 2001
). Thus, it is possible that the different effects of p-FHHSiD (i.e., competitive antagonism and nonmuscarinic receptor mediated inhibition) observed in this study are mediated by different enantiomers. This question is difficult to address because enantiomers of silanols similar to p-FHHSiD racemize quickly in aqueous solution because of the highly polar Si-O bond (Tacke et al., 1987
).
A variety of interesting antimuscarinic agents have been developed and analyzed for their muscarinic receptor binding properties and inhibitory effects in functional assays. Some of these agents have been shown to exhibit tissue selectivity in contractile assays on smooth muscle (e.g., zamifenacin; Watson et al., 1995
). Our results illustrate the power of resultant analysis in determining the true muscarinic receptor selectivity of an antagonist and suggest caution in assuming that the apparent tissue selectivity of a muscarinic antagonist implies tissue differences in muscarinic receptors. Our results might also suggest the existence of a high affinity (pKD = 8.0) nonmuscarinic binding site for p-FHHSiD that may nonetheless be a useful target for the development of tissue selective smooth relaxant agents that inhibit cholinergic induced contractions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: p-FHHSiD, p-fluorohexahydrosiladifenidol; KRB, Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate; 4-DAMP, N,N-dimethyl-4-piperidinyl diphenylacetate; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Frederick J. Ehlert, Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4625. E-mail: fjehlert{at}uci.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arunlakshana O and Schild HO (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmacol 14: 48-58.[Medline]
Barlow RB, Berry KJ, Glenton PA, Nilolaou NM, and Soh KS (1976) A comparison of affinity constants for muscarine-sensitive acetylcholine receptors in guinea-pig atrial pacemaker cells at 29°C and in ileum at 29°C and 37°C. Br J Pharmacol 58: 613-620.[Medline]
Barnes PJ (2003) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 12: New treatments for COPD. Thorax 58: 803-808.
Berridge MJ, Downes CP, and Hanley MR (1982) Lithium amplifies agonist-dependent phosphatidylinositol responses in brain and salivary glands. Biochem J 206: 587-595.[Medline]
Black JW, Gerskowitch VP, Leff P, and Shankley NP (1986) Analysis of competitive antagonism when this property occurs as part of a pharmacological resultant. Br J Pharmacol 89: 547-555.[Medline]
Candell LM, Yun SH, Tran LL, and Ehlert FJ (1990) Differential coupling of subtypes of the muscarinic receptor to adenylate cyclase and phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the longitudinal muscle of the rat ileum. Mol Pharmacol 38: 689-697.[Abstract]
de Groat WC and Yoshimura N (2001) Pharmacology of the lower urinary tract. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41: 691-721.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eglen RM, Hegde SS, and Watson N (1996) Muscarinic receptor subtypes and smooth muscle function. Pharmacol Rev 48: 531-565.[Medline]
Eglen RM, Michel AD, Montgomery WW, Kunysz EA, Machado CA, and Whiting RL (1990) The interaction of parafluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol at muscarinic receptors in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 99: 637-642.[Medline]
Ehlert FJ (2003) Pharmacological analysis of the contractile role of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor in smooth muscle. Recept Channels 9: 261-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ehlert FJ, Sawyer GW, and Esqueda EE (1999) Contractile role of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in gastrointestinal smooth muscle [published erratum appears in Life Sci 1999;64(26):2535]. Life Sci 64: 387-394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ehlert FJ, Thomas EA, Gerstin EH, and Griffin MT (1997) Muscarinic receptors and gastrointestinal smooth muscle, in Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in Smooth Muscle (Eglen RM ed) pp 92-147, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Esqueda EE, Gerstin EH Jr, Griffin MT, and Ehlert FJ (1996) Stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation and phosphoinositide hydrolysis by M3 muscarinic receptors in the rat peripheral lung. Biochem Pharmacol 52: 643-658.[CrossRef][Medline]
Griffin MT, Matsui M, Shehnaz D, Ansari KZ, Taketo MM, Manabe T, and Ehlert FJ (2004) Muscarinic agonist-mediated heterologous desensitization in isolated ileum requires activation of both muscarinic M2 and M3 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308: 339-349.
Kendall DA and Hill SJ (1990) Measurement of [3H]inositol phospholipid turnover, in Methods in Neurotransmitter Receptor Analysis (Yamamura HI ed) pp 68-87, Raven Press, New York.
Lambrecht G, Feifel R, Forth B, Strohmann C, Tacke R, and Mutschler E (1988) p-Fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol: the first M2 beta-selective muscarinic antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 152: 193-194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lambrecht G, Feifel R, Wagner-Roder M, Strohmann C, Zilch H, Tacke R, Waelbroeck M, Christophe J, Boddeke H, and Mutschler E (1989) Affinity profiles of hexahydro-sila-difenidol analogues at muscarinic receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 168: 71-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matsui M, Motomura D, Fujikawa T, Jiang J, Takahashi S, Manabe T, and Taketo MM (2002) Mice lacking M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are devoid of cholinergic smooth muscle contractions but still viable. J Neurosci 22: 10627-10632.
Matsui M, Motomura D, Karasawa H, Fujikawa T, Jiang J, Komiya Y, Takahashi S, and Taketo MM (2000) Multiple functional defects in peripheral autonomic organs in mice lacking muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene for the M3 subtype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 9579-9584.
Nilvebrant L, Hallen B, and Larsson G (1997) Tolterodinea new bladder selective muscarinic receptor antagonist: preclinical pharmacological and clinical data. Life Sci 60: 1129-1136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ostrom RS and Ehlert FJ (1997) M2 muscarinic receptor inhibition of agonist-induced cyclic adenosine monophosphate accumulation and relaxation in the guinea pig ileum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280: 1-11.
Ostrom RS and Ehlert FJ (1998) M2 muscarinic receptors inhibit forskolin- but not isoproterenol-mediated relaxation in bovine tracheal smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 234-242.
Paton WD and Vizi ES (1969) The inhibitory action of noradrenaline and adrenaline on acetylcholine output by guinea-pig ileum longitudinal muscle strip. Br J Pharmacol 35: 10-28.[Medline]
Roffel AF, Meurs H, Elzinga CR, and Zaagsma J (1990) Characterization of the muscarinic receptor subtype involved in phosphoinositide metabolism in bovine tracheal smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 99: 293-296.[Medline]
Sawyer GW and Ehlert FJ (1999) Muscarinic M3 receptor inactivation reveals a pertussis toxin-sensitive contractile response in the guinea pig colon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 464-476.
Stengel PW, Gomeza J, Wess J, and Cohen ML (2000) M(2) and M(4) receptor knockout mice: muscarinic receptor function in cardiac and smooth muscle in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292: 877-885.
Stengel PW, Yamada M, Wess J, and Cohen ML (2002) M(3)-receptor knockout mice: muscarinic receptor function in atria, stomach fundus, urinary bladder and trachea. Am J Physiol 282: R1443-R1449.
Tacke R, Kornek T, Heinrich T, Burschka C, Penka M, Pulm M, Keim C, Mutschler E, and Lambrecht G (2001) Syntheses and pharmacological characterization of achiral and chiral enantiopure C/Si/Ge-analogous derivatives of the muscarininc antagonist cycrimine: a study on C//Si/Ge biosterism. J Organometallic Chem 640: 140-165.[CrossRef]
Tacke R, Linoh H, Ernst L, Moser U, Mutschler E, Sarge S, Cammenga HK, and Lambrecht G (1987) Preparation and properties of the enantiomers of the antimuscarinic agents sila-procyclidine and sila-tricyclamol iodide: optically active silanols with silicon as the center of chirality. Chem Ber 120: 1229-1237.
Tacke R, Reichel D, Kropfgans M, Jones PG, Mutschler E, Gross J, Hou X, Waelbroeck M, and Lambrecht G (1995) Biological recognition of enantiomeric silanes: syntheses and antimuscarinic properties of optically active (2-aminoethyl)cyclohexyl(hydroxymethyl)phenylsilanes and related quaternary ammonium derivatives. Organometallics 14: 251-262.[CrossRef]
Talley NJ (2003) Pharmacologic therapy for the irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 750-758.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thomas EA, Baker SA, and Ehlert FJ (1993) Functional role for the M2 muscarinic receptor in smooth muscle of guinea pig ileum. Mol Pharmacol 44: 102-110.[Abstract]
Wallis RM and Napier CM (1999) Muscarinic antagonists in development for disorders of smooth muscle function. Life Sci 64: 395-401.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watson N, Reddy H, Stefanich E, and Eglen RM (1995) Characterization of the interaction of zamifenacin at muscarinic receptors in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 285: 135-142.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||