![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM, AND EXCRETION
Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (J.L., N.H., B.D.P., B.C.B., P.K., L.-M.C.); and Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (M.T.)
Received March 2, 2004; accepted April 5, 2004.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-phthalimidoglutarimide, Thal), despite its teratogenicity (McBride, 1961
There have been a number of other studies on the in vitro metabolism of Thal in different species. Ando and coworkers compared the ability of liver microsomes from five different species to form 5-hydroxythalidomide (5-OH Thal) and cis-5'-OH Thal and found that human microsomes had the lowest activity (Ando et al., 2002a
). The formation of 5,6-dihydroxythalidomide was also reported, with CYP2C19 identified as responsible for the hydroxylation of Thal in humans. Another study (Eriksson et al., 1998
) has compared the formation of hydroxylated metabolites in vitro using human S9 liver fractions and in vivo in healthy human volunteers: both 5-OH Thal and cis-5'-OH Thal were formed in vitro but only cis-5'-OH Thal was detected in vivo. However, Teo et al., (2000
) did not detect any metabolites after incubating Thal with human liver microsomes or in the plasma of patients with Hansen's disease, although trace amounts of 5-OH Thal were detected in urine. We have taken advantage of progress in the chemical synthesis of Thal metabolites, together with the development of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and LC-MS technologies, to determine the rate of 5-OH Thal formation in liver microsomes of mice, rabbits, and humans, as well as to characterize all the major metabolites formed in vitro to compare them with those formed in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Liver Microsome Preparation. All studies with animals and humans conformed to institutional ethical guidelines. Human livers were obtained from two liver donors, HL5 and HL18, and stored in the human liver bank at the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology (Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland). These livers have been genotyped for CYP2C19; HL18 is CYP2C19 *1/*2 and HL5 is CYP2C19 *1/*1. Pooled C57/Bl/6 mouse livers and livers from New Zealand White rabbit and human donors were rinsed in ice-cold phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and blotted dry. Liver weights were recorded. Livers were then homogenized in 67 mM phosphate buffer containing 1.15% KCl (volume of buffer was 3 times the weight of the liver). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 10,000g for 20 min, and the supernatant was removed and centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h. The supernatant was again removed and the remaining microsomal pellets were rinsed with phosphate buffer. The rinsed pellets were resuspended in a small volume of phosphate buffer and stored at 80°C until analysis. The protein content of microsomes of all three species was determined using bicinchoninic acid assay (Smith et al., 1985
).
Microsomal Incubation and Sample Preparation for HPLC and LC-MS. In the preliminary control experiments, the degradation of 400 µM Thal was <10% in phosphate buffer at 37°C. The rate of Thal hydroxylation was linear with respect to microsomal protein concentration (0.42 mg/ml) and time (1030 min) in mouse and rabbit hepatic microsomes and linear between 0.62 mg/ml and 4060 min in the presence of human liver microsomes. Incubations were carried out in a shaking water bath at 37°C for 30 min for mouse and rabbit microsomes and 60 min for human microsomes. The reaction mixture consisted of 67 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 4 mM NADPH, Thal (6.25600 µM), and 2 mg/ml microsomes in a final volume of 300 µl. Thal was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and then diluted in phosphate buffer (final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide was <0.2%). After a 5-min preincubation, the reaction was initiated by addition of hepatic microsomes. Boiled microsomes were added to the control incubations. The reaction was terminated by addition of 300 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid containing phenacetin as an internal standard and was then vortexed and centrifuged (3000g) for 10 min to remove precipitated protein (Torano et al., 1999
). The supernatants were processed by solid phase extraction as described previously (Lu et al., 2003
), and the dry residues were reconstituted in 300 µl of mobile phase. Reconstituted samples were analyzed for 5-OH Thal concentration (200 µl each) using HPLC and metabolite identification (100 µl each) determined by LC-MS immediately afterward.
Detection and Identification of Metabolites Formed in Vitro Using LC-MS. Samples (100 µl) from preliminary in vitro incubations (using 2 mg/ml liver microsomes, 400 µM Thal, and 60-min incubation time) and the final in vitro incubations (using 2 mg/ml liver microsomes, 6.25600 µM Thal, and incubation time of 30 min for rabbit and mouse, 60 min for human) were analyzed together with authentic standards using an Agilent 1100 series LC-MS system (Agilent Techonologies, Avondale, PA) as described previously (Lu et al., 2003
) with two modifications. The proportions of solution A (80% ACN, 1% glacial acetic acid, and 19% Milli Q water) and solution B (9.5% ACN, 1% glacial acetic acid, and 89.5% Milli Q water) in the mobile phase were altered slightly to improve resolution; all samples were analyzed using diode array UV detection at 230 nm and mass spectral detection set on negative-ion scan mode with a molecular weight range of 70 to 1000 amu, negative single-ion monitoring mode, with the sensitivity of 1 pg, at the molecular weights 257, 273, 275, 276, 289, 291, 293, 294, and 449, and positive single-ion monitoring mode at the molecular weights 259, 275, 277, 278, 291, 293, 295, 296, and 451 (corresponding to each of the peaks) simultaneously. Chromatograms of each sample were compared with control samples and authentic standards, and molecular masses of metabolites were obtained by mass spectral detection. The relative abundances of peaks of interest in negative single-ion mass spectral-detected chromatograms or UV-detected chromatograms were obtained from integration using ChemStation Software (Agilent Technologies).
In Vitro 5-OH Thal Formation. Samples were analyzed for 5-OH Thal concentrations using HPLC. Solutions containing a range of concentrations of 5-OH Thal, together with phenacetin as internal standard, were processed alongside with samples. 5-OH Thal concentrations were determined using the method developed from this laboratory with slight modifications of HPLC run time and mobile phase (Chung et al., 2004
,Chung et al., 2004
). In brief, duplicate aliquots (100 µl) of reconstituted samples were loaded onto a Waters Breeze chromatograph (Waters, Milford, MA), which consisted of a model 717plus auto-sampler, model 1525 binary pump, and model 2487 dual wavelength absorbance detector. Compounds of interest were separated using a 100 x 4.6-mm stainless steel Luna 5-µm Phenylhexyl column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) as well as a combination of the following solutions: solution A, which contained 100% acetonitrile, and solution B, which contained 10% acetonitrile and 1% acetic acid in Milli Q water. The elution program was 100% solution B at 0.5 ml/min over 0 to 10 min, addition of 0 to 10% solution A in a linear gradient at 1 ml/min over 10 to 15 min, 90% solution B and 10% solution A at 1 ml/min over 15 to 23 min, subtraction of 10 to 0% solution A in a linear gradient at 0.5 ml/min over 23 to 27 min and 100% solution B at 0.5 ml/min over 27 to 30 min. Phenacetin, Thal, and 5-OH Thal were detected at ultraviolet wavelengths of 220 and 248 nm. The retention times of 5-OH Thal and phenacetin were 20.1 and 22.8 min, respectively. Data acquisition and integration were achieved using Breeze Software (Waters, Milford, MA). A calibration curve of 5-OH Thal in phosphate buffer was prepared fresh for each HPLC run. To construct the calibration curve, the peak/area ratios relative to the internal standard were plotted against 5-OH Thal concentrations and the best-fit straight line was obtained by linear regression analysis. The range of calibration curve of 5-OH Thal was 0.125 µM(r2 = 0.999). The intra-assay accuracy and precision were acceptable with relative recoveries and coefficient of variation of 90 to 110% and 5 to 9% (n = 3), respectively. Similar results were achieved for interassay accuracy and precision with relative recoveries and coefficient of variations of 96 to 104 and 2 to 4% (n = 5). Quality control liver microsomes with three nominal 5-OH Thal concentrations (0.2, 5, and 25 µM) added were stored at 80°C. These were included in each analysis and were found to be stable over a period of 14 days and within 3% of the validated value, respectively. Reconstituted samples (100 µl each in duplicate) were injected onto HPLC and 5-OH Thal concentrations were determined using calibration curve described above. The 5-OH Thal concentrations were used to calculate the rate of formation. Michaelis-Menten models were used to describe the in vitro enzyme kinetics, and the kinetic parameters were determined by Prism 3.0 program (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
A comparison of the relative formation of hydroxylated metabolites by hepatic microsomes in the different species indicates that metabolic rate via hydroxylation is mouse > rabbit > human (Table 2). In particular, the relative abundance of each of the hydroxylated metabolite peaks produced by HL18 microsomes was much lower than the corresponding peak formed by mouse or rabbit liver microsomes (Table 2). Similarly, the relative amount of hydroxylated metabolites was higher in the presence of mouse liver microsomes compared with rabbit liver microsomes, with the exception of peak 3.
|
The relative amount of hydrolysis products formed in microsomes from all three species did not differ significantly from the amount in control samples regardless of microsomal concentrations, with the exception of phthaloylisoglutamine (peak 5) and N-(o-carboxybenzoyl)isoglutamine (peak 2) in rabbit microsomal solutions (Figs. 1 and 2; Table 3). The formation of phthaloylisoglutamine exhibited a linear relationship with rabbit microsomal protein concentration (r2 = 0.983; Fig. 3). Hence, it seems that the hydrolysis of Thal to phthaloylisoglutamine in rabbit microsomes, at high substrate concentrations (400 µM), is an enzymatic process. Increased formation of N-(o-carboxybenzoyl)isoglutamine (peak 2) may be a consequence of the hydrolysis of the phthalimide ring of phthaloylisoglutamine (peak 5). Another finding in accordance with the above-mentioned finding is that incubating rabbit and mouse microsome with Thal at 6.25 µM did not show difference in phthaloylisoglutamine formation, but when Thal concentrations were raised to 12.5 µM and above, rabbit liver microsome formed more phthaloylisoglutamine than mice.
|
|
The relative percentages of metabolite formation were obtained by comparing the peak areas of metabolites detected by UV with the sum of peak areas of all the metabolites and thalidomide (Fig. 2). A comparison of the relative total formation of hydrolysis products and hydroxylated metabolites in microsomes from the three species indicates that rabbit has the highest overall metabolic clearance of Thal (25.7%), mainly due to enzymatic hydrolysis (Table 4). In human and mouse liver microsomes, the formation of hydrolysis products was lower (7.77.9%) and due solely to nonenzymatic hydrolysis (Table 4). In contrast, metabolic clearance of Thal via hydroxylation was negligible in human liver microsomes and highest in mouse microsomes (6.1%).
|
Rate of 5-OH Thal Formation. Previous studies have indicated that the formation of 5-OH Thal may be catalyzed by CYP2C19 (Ando et al., 2002a
). To determine the relative rates of metabolism of Thal to 5-OH Thal in the three species, the enzyme kinetics of 5-OH Thal formation was determined. HPLC with UV detection resolved the hydroxylated metabolites (cis- and trans-5'-OH Thal and 5-OH Thal) and internal standard (phenacetin) from Thal with retention times of 18.3, 19.6, 20.1, 22.8, and 23.6 min, respectively. The formation of 5-OH Thal increased linearly with mouse and rabbit microsomal protein concentrations up to 2 mg/ml (r2 = 0.984 and 0.985, respectively), whereas the formation of 5-OH Thal by human liver microsomes was close to the limit of detection. Microsomes from donor HL18 (CYP2C19 *1/*2) formed measurable amounts of 5-OH Thal (quantitative limit of 0.1 µM) at microsomal concentrations higher than 0.6 mg/ml, whereas 5-OH Thal formed by microsomes from donor HL5 (CYP2C19 *1/*1) was below the limit of detection. The formation of 5-OH Thal also increased with incubation time in the presence of 2 mg/ml mouse and rabbit liver microsomes and was linear up to 30 min (r2 = 0.998 and 0.999 for mouse and rabbit, respectively), whereas 5-OH Thal formation by human liver microsomes (HL18) required an incubation time of greater than 40 min. Microsomes from mouse and rabbit formed measurable 5-OH Thal at concentrations of Thal above 6.25 µM. The formation of 5-OH Thal followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Fig. 4) and the kinetic parameters Vmax (maximum velocity of reaction) and KM (Michaelis-Menten constant) were 45.2 pmol/min/mg and 208.3 µM for mouse microsomes, and 11.91 pmol/min/mg and 88.02 µM for rabbit microsomes, respectively. Previous reports have indicated that the metabolism of Thal to 5-OH and cis-5'-OH Thal may be important routes of metabolic clearance catalyzed by CYP2C19 in vitro (Ando et al., 2002a
), but the kinetic parameters of Thal to 5-OH Thal in microsomes were not calculated due to the nonlinear formation of 5-OH Thal. We used conditions optimized for 5-OH Thal formation (higher microsomal protein concentration and shorter incubation time) to calculate the kinetic parameters because it seemed to be the major route of metabolism detected in vivo (Lu et al., 2003
; Chung et al., 2004
,Chung et al., 2004
). However, as products of further hydroxylation of cis-, trans-5'-OH Thal, and 5-OH Thal were detected in the present in vitro study, kinetic parameters of formation of the primary hydroxylated metabolites of Thal (5-OH and cis-5'-OH) are compromised by the rate(s) of the second hydroxylation step; hence, the kinetic parameters, in particular KM, can only be described as apparent. The apparent intrinsic clearance (CLint) (CLint = Vmax/KM) of Thal to 5-OH Thal in mouse and rabbit microsomes was 0.217 and 0.135 ml/min/g, respectively. Therefore, the apparent in vitro intrinsic clearance was 1.6-fold greater in mouse than rabbit microsomes. In contrast, the Vmax, KM, and CLint from Thal to 5-OH Thal in HL18 microsomes were 0.334 pmol/min/mg, 85.8 µM, and 0.004 ml/min/g, respectively. However, given that the data were calculated only from three concentration points (200, 400, and 600 µM), where detectable 5-OH Thal was formed, the results are only an estimate of the kinetics of formation of 5-OH Thal in human microsomes. A comparison of the apparent CLint of Thal to 5-OH Thal in the different species and in vivo plasma clearance of Thal (Cl/F) determined previously (unpublished data) are shown in Table 5. The relative rates of metabolism of Thal to 5-OH Thal in the three species in vitro correlates with the total in vivo clearance of Thal. Mouse has the highest rate of in vivo clearance (0.03 l/min/kg) and the highest rate of in vitro clearance to 5-OH Thal, whereas the negligible in vitro clearance of Thal to 5-OH Thal occurs in human liver microsomes corresponds to the very low in vivo clearance of Thal (0.0023 l/min/kg).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nonenzymatic hydrolysis of Thal was observed in this study, confirming previous results from other groups in a number of species, including rats, humans, and rabbits (Faigle, 1962
; Keberle et al., 1965
; Schumacher et al., 1965
; Williams et al., 1965
). In addition, we have found evidence of significant enzymatic hydrolysis of Thal to phthaloylisoglutamine in rabbit hepatic microsomes. This confirms an earlier report (Schumacher et al., 1968
) indicating that the rate of hydrolysis of Thal was higher in rabbit liver than in rat liver, although the specific hydrolysis pathway from Thal to phthaloylisoglutamine was not identified. Because no differences in the relative amounts of phthaloylisoglutamine in the plasma of mice and rabbits after administration of Thal (2 mg/kg p.o.) were observed (Chung et al., 2004
,Chung et al., 2004
), enzymatic hydrolysis would be expected to occur only at the high Thal concentrations used in in vitro experiments (
12.5 µM) and not at plasma concentrations (Cmax < 2.2 µM) that are observed in vivo (Chung et al., 2004
,Chung et al., 2004
). Thalidomide is mainly excreted in the form of metabolites as shown by that less than 1% of the administered dose is excreted unchanged in urine in many species (Smith et al., 1965
). Total metabolic clearance of Thal in vitro via both hydrolysis (enzymatic and nonenzymatic) and hydroxylation was greatest in the rabbit and negligible in human liver microsomes. However, because enzymatic hydrolysis of Thal in the rabbit may not occur at in vivo concentrations, clearance via hydroxylation may be more important.
Although hydroxylated metabolites were measurable in human microsomal incubations with donor liver HL18, no metabolism of Thal was observed with another human liver donor HL5. This is in agreement with previous reports (Ando et al., 2002a
) where of two human livers, one produced metabolites at or below the limit of quantification, and the other source had very low rate of metabolite formation. Ando et al. (2002a
) indicated that this was related to the relative expression of CYP2C19; however, pooled human liver microsomes were also very poor metabolizers of Thal. Of the two livers used in this study, one HL5 was homozygous wild type (*1/*1) for CYP2C19, and the other liver HL18 was a heterozygote for the mutant allele (*1/*2). Although, in vitro studies with purified CYP2C19 indicated that this enzyme is involved in the hydroxylation of Thal, more recent in vivo studies (Ando et al., 2002b
) have indicated that some patients with an extensive metabolizer genotype do not hydroxylate Thal to any significant extent. The role of CYP2C19 in the metabolism of Thal requires further study, but importantly, regardless of the P450 isozyme(s) involved, the overall rate of metabolism of Thal is negligible in human liver in comparison with mouse and rabbit.
In conclusion, the results support previous reports of low in vitro metabolic clearance of Thal in humans (Ando et al., 2002a
) and suggest that there is minimal involvement of the hepatic P450 system in Thal metabolism. The data support in vivo data showing that hydroxylated metabolites are not detectable in patients with multiple myeloma (Lu et al., 2003
; Chung et al., 2004
,Chung et al., 2004
) or with Hansen's disease (Teo et al., 2000
). Hydroxylated metabolites can be detected in vitro but only at concentrations of Thal (200600 µM) that are well above the highest plasma concentrations of Thal (50 µM) that have reported in human studies (Figg et al., 1999
). These results suggest that Thal is unlikely to interact with other drugs extensively metabolized by human P450 system (Trapnell et al., 1998
; Scheffler et al., 1999
; Teo et al., 2000
), which makes it a good candidate for combined chemotherapy. The data also strongly suggest that hydroxylated metabolites are unlikely to be involved in the mechanism of action of Thal in humans and that the parent compound and/or its hydrolysis product(s) are involved in its action.
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: Thal, thalidomide; 5-OH Thal, 5-hydroxythalidomide; 5'-OH Thal, 5'-hydroxythalidomide; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; P450, cytochrome P450; ACN, acetonitrile.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Lai-Ming Ching, The Auckland Cancer Society Research Center, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: l.ching{at}auckland.ac.nz
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ando Y, Fuse E, and Figg WD (2002a) Thalidomide metabolism by the CYP2C subfamily. Clin Can Res 8: 19641973.
Ando Y, Price DK, Dahut WL, Cox MC, Reed E, and Figg WD (2002b) Pharmacogenetic associations of CYP2C19 genotype with in vivo metabolisms and pharmacological effects of thalidomide. Cancer Biol Ther 1: 669673.[Medline]
Barfield M, Spear RJ, and Sternhell S (1975) Interproton spin-spin coupling across a dual path in 2,5-dihydrofurans and phthalans. J Am Chem Soc 97: 51605167.[CrossRef]
Calabrese L and Fleischer AB (2000) Thalidomide: current and potential clinical applications. Am J Med 108: 487495.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chung F, Lu J, Palmer BD, Kestell P, Browett P, Baguley BC, Tingle MD and Ching LM (2004) Thalidomide pharmacokinetics and metabolite formation in mice, rabbits and multiple myeloma patients. Clin Cancer Res, in press.
Chung F, Wang LCS, Kestell P, Baguley BC, and Ching LM (2004) Modulation of thalidomide pharmacokinetics by cyclophosphamide or 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) in mice: the role of tumour necrosis factor. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 53: 377383.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eisen TG (2000) Thalidomide in solid tumors: the London experience. Oncology (Huntington) 14: 1720.
Eriksson T, Bjorkman S, Roth B, Bjork H, and Hoglund P (1998) Hydroxylated metabolites of thalidomide: formation in-vitro and in-vivo in man. J Pharm Pharmacol 50: 14091416.[Medline]
Faigle JW (1962) The metabolic fate of thalidomide. Experientia 18: 389397.[CrossRef]
Figg WD, Raje S, Bauer KS, Tompkins A, Venzon D, Bergan R, Chen A, Hamilton M, Pluda J, and Reed E (1999) Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in an elderly prostate cancer population. J Pharm Sci 88: 121125.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gordon GB, Spielberg SP, Blake DA, and Balasubramanian V (1981) Thalidomide teratogenesis: evidence for a toxic arene oxide metabolite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 25452548.
Keberle H, Faigle JW, Fritz H, Knusel F, Loustalot P, and Schmid K (1965) Theories on the mechanism of action of thalidomide, in Embryopathic Activity of Drugs (Robson JM, Sullivan FM, and Smith RL eds) pp 210233, J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London.
Lenz W (1962) Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities. Lancet 1: 45.
Lu J, Palmer BD, Kestell P, Browett P, Baguley BC, Muller G, and Ching LM (2003) Thalidomide metabolites in mice and patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 9: 16801688.
McBride W (1961) Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities. Lancet 2: 1358.
Scheffler MR, Colburn W, Kook KA, and Thomas SD (1999) Thalidomide does not alter estrogen-progesterone hormone single dose pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 65: 483490.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schumacher H, Blake DA, and Gillette JR (1968) Disposition of thalidomide in rabbits and rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 160: 201211.
Schumacher H, Smith RL, and Williams RT (1965) The metabolism of thalidomide: the fate of thalidomide and some of its hydrolysis products in various species. Br J Pharmacol 25: 338351.[Medline]
Sheskin J (1965) Further observation with thalidomide in lepra reactions. Leprosy Rev 36: 183187.[Medline]
Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, et al. (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341: 15651571.
Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Garter FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, and Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bichinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150: 7685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith RL, Fabro S, Schumacher H, and Williams RT (1965) Studies on the relationship between the chemical structure and embryotoxic activity of thalidomide and related compound, in Embryopathic Activity of Drugs (Robson JM, Sullivan FM, and Smith RL eds) pp 195209, J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London.
Teo SK, Sabourin PJ, O'Brien K, Kook KA, and Thomas SD (2000) Metabolism of thalidomide in human microsomes, cloned human cytochrome P-450 isozymes and Hansen's disease patients. J Biochem Toxicol 14: 140147.
Torano JS, Verbon A, and Guchelaar HJ (1999) Quantitative determination of thalidomide in human serum with high-performance liquid chromatography using protein precipitation with trichloroacetic acid and ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 734: 203210.
Trapnell CB, Donahue SR, Collins JM, Flockhart DA, Thacker D, and Abernethy DR (1998) Thalidomide does not alter the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 64: 597602.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williams RT, Schumacher H, Fabro S, and Smith RL (1965) The chemistry and metabolism of thalidomide, in Embryopathic Activity of Drugs (Robson JM, Sullivan FM, and Smith RL eds) pp 167193, J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London.
Zwingenberger K and Wnendt S (1996) Immunomodulation by thalidomide: systematic review of the literature and of unpublished observations. J Inflamm 46: 177211.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Helsby, M. A. Goldthorpe, M. H. Y. Tang, G. J. Atwell, E. M. Smith, W. R. Wilson, and M. D. Tingle Influence of Mustard Group Structure on Pathways of in Vitro Metabolism of Anticancer N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-3,5-dinitrobenzamide 2-Mustard Prodrugs Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||