![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY
Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Parkville, Australia; and Department of Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Received October 10, 2003; accepted December 22, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiological evidence indicates that men have an earlier onset of schizophrenia, compared with women, of approximately 3 to 4 years (Häfner et al., 1993
). This sex difference in age-at-onset is consistent across cultures and is found by many studies, regardless of the definition of onset and definition of illness used (Häfner et al., 1993
; Castle et al., 1995
). Furthermore, only in women does the distribution peak for age-at-onset of schizophrenia show a second peak around 50 years of age (Castle et al., 1995
). Compared with men, women demonstrate a less severe course of illness in terms of milder symptoms, superior treatment response to antipsychotic medication, and improved social, intellectual, and occupational outcome (Seeman and Lang, 1990
; Castle et al., 1995
).
The common interpretation of these epidemiological data is that the female hormone, estrogen, plays a neuroprotective role in schizophrenia (Seeman and Lang, 1990
; Häfner et al., 1993
). Female schizophrenia patients have lower estrogen levels compared with healthy controls (Oades and Schepker, 1994
; Riecher-Rossler et al., 1994
). In addition, schizophrenic symptomatology in women increases at times of low circulating estrogen levels (e.g., postpartum) and decreases at times of high estrogen levels (e.g., during pregnancy) (Seeman and Lang, 1990
; Riecher-Rossler et al., 1994
). Recently, estrogen treatment was used in a placebo-controlled clinical trial in women with acute schizophrenia. It was found that estrogen improved schizophrenic symptoms by accelerating the beneficial effect of the antipsychotic treatment (Kulkarni et al., 2001
). Compared with estrogen, however, little is known about the role of other female hormones, such as progesterone, in schizophrenia.
Estrogen has been found to reduce 5-HT1A receptor gene expression in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Pecins-Thompson and Bethea, 1999
), regions of the hippocampus (Birzniece et al., 2001
) and amygdala (Österlund and Hurd, 1998
). Progesterone further reduces 5-HT1A receptor gene expression in the dorsal raphe nucleus of estrogen-primed animals (Pecins-Thompson and Bethea, 1999
); however, it increases 5-HT1A receptor gene expression in the hippocampus (Birzniece et al., 2001
). Therefore, in the present study, we focus on the interaction of estrogen and progesterone with 5-HT1A receptors.
To study this interaction, we used prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. PPI is shown in humans as well as in experimental animals and has construct, face, and predictive validity as an animal model of sensorimotor gating (Swerdlow et al., 1996
). Sensorimotor gating functions as a filter of irrelevant information, which prevents information overload and allows for coherent thought. Deficits in gating incoming sensory information may result in stimulus flooding and misinterpretation of stimuli (Geyer and Markou, 1995
), and may cause certain symptoms of schizophrenia, such as disturbed thought (Perry and Braff, 1994
), and delusions and hallucinations (Rigdon and Weatherspoon, 1992
). It has been shown that patients with schizophrenia have deficient PPI, and treatment with atypical antipsychotic medication may reverse this deficit (Braff et al., 2001
). Administration of 5-HT1A receptor agonists to rats causes a marked disruption of PPI (Rigdon and Weatherspoon, 1992
).
In intact female rats, PPI has been found to be reduced during proestrous, i.e., the high estrogen phase of the estrous cycle (Koch, 1998
). In contrast, ovariectomized rats receiving acute estrogen injections displayed increased PPI (Van den Buuse and Eikelis, 2001
). In addition, estrogen did not seem to interact with central dopaminergic or glutamatergic mechanisms in PPI (Van den Buuse and Eikelis, 2001
). In male rats, progesterone was found to partially reverse apomorphine-induced disruption of PPI (Rupprecht et al., 1999
). Neither of these studies has yet examined the effects of these hormones on serotonergic mechanisms, nor has progesterone treatment been tested in female rats. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the interaction of estrogen and progesterone with 5-HT1A receptor-mediated effects on PPI, in female ovariectomized rats.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ovariectomy. Rats were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of sodium pentobarbitone (Nembutal, 60 mg/ml; Merial Australia, Rhone Merieux, QLD, Australia), with an injection volume of 1 ml/kg, and placed upon a heat pad. The abdominal area was shaved and the skin cleaned with an antiseptic solution (0.1% chlorhexidine acetate; Baxter Healthcare, Old Toongabbie, NSW, Australia). A midline incision was made through the skin and the muscle layer, avoiding the intestines. The ovaries were located and a piece of silk suture (Cyanamid Australia, Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia) was used to ligate the fallopian tubes, after which the ovaries were carefully removed. The muscle layer and skin were suture-closed. Intact rats were sham-operated.
Hormone Treatment. During the ovariectomy procedure, rats were subcutaneously implanted with silastic implants at the nape of the neck. These implants were either empty or filled with crystalline steroid hormones and were of a length aimed at maintaining normal circulating levels, as reported previously (Williams and Lipner, 1982
; Albert et al., 1991
; Suzuki et al., 1995
; Lerant and Freeman, 1998
). Estrogen implants were 5 mm in length, and filled with either 100% estradiol (17
-estradiol, salt; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), or a 20% estradiol-cholesterol mixture (5-cholesten-3
-OL, salt; Steraloids, Newport, RI). Progesterone implants were 35 mm in length and filled with 100% progesterone (4-pregnene-3,20-dione, salt; Sigma-Aldrich). The implants were prepared the day before surgery with silastic tubing (Dow Corning, i.d. 1.98 mm, o.d. 3.18 mm; Futuremedics Australia, Balwyn, VIC, Australia) that was cut to the required length plus an additional 6 mm. Each end of the tube was sealed with 3 mm of silicon sealant. Before the implant was inserted, it was immersed in 100% ethanol and then soaked in sterile saline (0.9% sodium chloride; Baxter Healthcare) for 10 min.
Postoperative Procedures. After surgery, antiseptic cream (Betadine, povidone-iodine 10%; Faulding Consumer, Salisbury, SA, Australia) was applied over the sutures. Rats were also given a s.c. injection of 5 mg/kg of the nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory analgesic carprofen (Zenecarp, 50 mg/ml; Heriot AgVet, Rowville, VIC, Australia). Behavioral experiments commenced 2 weeks after surgery. Three days after completion of experiments, the rats were killed by decapitation, and the uteri were removed and weighed. One untreated ovariectomized rat was removed from data analysis due to an abnormally high uterus weight.
Prepulse Inhibition. PPI of the acoustic startle response was measured with four automated startle chambers (SR-Lab; San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA). Rats were placed individually into a transparent Plexiglas cylinder (8.8 cm in diameter) that was closed on each end. Each cylinder was positioned on a platform with a piezoelectric transducer mounted below the platform to detect whole body startle responses. The cylinders were placed in a well lit, sound-attenuating and ventilated cabinet. Background noise and acoustic noise bursts were presented through a speaker, and responses were measured with the SR-Lab software (San Diego Instruments) running on a PC in an adjacent room.
PPI sessions were conducted as described previously (Van den Buuse and Eikelis, 2001
). In brief, there were 100 trials, including 40 115-dB pulse-alone trials and 50 prepulse-pulse trials. Prepulse-pulse trials consisted of a prepulse (PP) of an intensity of 2, 4, 8, 12, or 16-dB above the 70-dB background (10 each), followed 100 ms later by a startle pulse of 115-dB. Trials were presented with variable intervals (10-37 s) to prevent learning and anticipatory responses. Startle data are measured using the middle 20 115-dB pulse-alone trials. The percentage of PPI was calculated as the difference in amplitude between the startle response to the pulse-alone trials and the prepulse-pulse trials, divided by the response to the pulse-alone trial x 100%. Each PPI session also included 10 no-stimulus trials to control for nonspecific movement artifacts.
Experimental Protocol. For experiment 1, female rats were randomly chosen to become sham-operated controls receiving an empty implant (n = 10); ovariectomized (OVX) rats receiving an empty implant (n = 10); OVX rats implanted with the 20% estradiol mixture (E20, n = 8); or OVX rats treated with the 100% estrogen-filled implant (E100, n = 7). Based on the results of experiment 1, for experiment 2, female rats were randomly chosen to become OVX rats receiving an empty implant (n = 10); OVX rats treated with progesterone (P, n = 7); or OVX rats treated with both E20 and P (E/P, n = 9).
Two weeks after surgery, all rats were randomly injected with saline, or 0.02 or 0.5 mg/kg of the selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT, salt; Sigma/RBI, Natick, MA). These doses were selected on the basis of the literature (Rigdon and Weatherspoon, 1992
; Sipes and Geyer, 1995
) and preliminary experiments. 8-OH-DPAT was dissolved in sterile saline and administered in the flank (s.c.) 10 min before the rat being placed in the PPI chamber. In a randomized, crossover protocol, all rats in each experiment received all treatments, with 3 to 4 days allowed between each experiment.
Statistical Analysis. PPI and startle data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, where appropriate, using the statistical software package SYSTAT 9.0 (SPSS Science Inc., Chicago, IL). In both experiments, we assessed main effects of group and of dose, and interactions of dose by group. When significant differences were found in the main analysis, further pairwise ANOVAs were analyzed. Differences between groups or treatments were considered to be significant at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Startle Amplitude. Treatment with 8-OH-DPAT caused a significant dose-dependent increase in startle amplitude [main effect of dose F(2,62) = 10.0; p < 0.001; Fig. 1]. There were no differences between the groups nor of the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on startle amplitude between groups.
|
With respect to the effect of 8-OH-DPAT, pairwise ANOVA showed that startle amplitude was significantly increased in rats treated with 0.02 mg/kg [F(1,31) = 5.0; p = 0.032] and 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT [F(1,31) = 22.6; p < 0.001], compared with saline treatment (Fig. 1). In addition, startle amplitudes were higher after treatment with 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT than 0.02 mg/kg [F(1,31) = 4.7; p = 0.038].
Prepulse Inhibition. When comparing all the rat groups of experiment 1, there was a highly significant main effect of prepulse intensity [F(4,124) = 227.9; p < 0.001], reflecting the expected progressive reduction of startle responses with increasing prepulse intensity (Fig. 2). There was also a significant main effect of dose [F(2,62) = 15.0; p < 0.001], reflecting the dose-dependent reduction of PPI induced by 8-OH-DPAT. Furthermore, the effect of 8-OH-DPAT seemed to depend on the prepulse intensity, as shown by a significant prepulse by dose interaction [F(8,248) = 4.0; p < 0.001]. No main group effect was found, but the disruption of PPI caused by 8-OH-DPAT was different between the four groups [dose by group interaction F(6,62) = 2.4; p = 0.038]. In addition, there was a significant dose by prepulse by group interaction [F(24,248) = 1.9; p = 0.010].
|
With respect to the main effect of dose, pairwise ANOVA showed that, compared with saline treatment, PPI was significantly reduced in rats treated with 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT [F(1,31) = 26.5; p < 0.001], but not with 0.02 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. The significant dose by prepulse interaction reflects that the 0.5 mg/kg dose of 8-OH-DPAT caused a greater disruption at the lower prepulse intensities (data not shown).
The differential effect of 8-OH-DPAT in the different hormone treatment groups was further explored with pairwise ANOVAs. When analyzing data from sham-operated rats and untreated OVX rats only, ANOVA showed no significant dose by group interaction, reflecting the similar effect of 8-OH-DPAT in these two groups (Fig. 2). Similarly, when combining data from untreated OVX rats and E20-treated OVX rats, there was no dose by group interaction. In contrast, there is a significant dose by group interaction [F(2,30) = 4.2; p = 0.025] when comparing untreated OVX rats and E100-treated rats, reflecting the marked reduction of the effect of 8-OH-DPAT in E100-treated rats compared with untreated OVX rats (Figs. 2 and 5). Treatment with 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT induced a 31% reduction of average PPI in untreated OVX rats, but only a 6% reduction in E100-treated OVX rats (Fig. 5).
|
Experiment 2: Effect of Estrogen and/or Progesterone Treatment
Body and Uterus Weight. There was no significant difference in body weight between either of the groups at the time of surgery (Table 1). However, although the body weight gain of P-treated OVX rats was not significantly different to the untreated OVX rat group, the E/P-treated OVX rats showed significantly less weight gain compared with untreated OVX rats [F(1,17) = 71.9; p < 0.001]. In addition, the untreated and P-treated OVX rats had similar uterus weights (Table 1), whereas E/P-treated OVX rats had significantly higher uterus weight compared with untreated OVX rats [F(1,20) = 336.6; p < 0.001].
Startle Amplitude. As in experiment 1, treatment with 8-OH-DPAT caused a significant dose-dependent increase in startle amplitude [main effect of dose F(2,46) = 3.6; p = 0.034; Fig. 3]. There were, however, overall differences between the groups [main effect of group F(2,23) = 4.6; p = 0.020] and the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on startle amplitude tended to be different between groups [dose by group interaction F(4,46) = 2.7; p = 0.043].
|
With respect to the effect of 8-OH-DPAT, pairwise ANOVA showed that startle amplitude was significantly increased in rats treated with 0.02 mg/kg [F(1,23) = 6.3; p = 0.020] but not 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT, compared with saline treatment (Fig. 3).
With respect to the main effect of group (and slight dose by group interaction), pairwise ANOVA comparing untreated OVX rats and E/P-treated OVX rats revealed a significant difference in startle amplitude [F(1,17) = 7.8; p = 0.013]. Inspection of the data (Fig. 3) suggested that whereas E/P-treated OVX rats showed a dose-dependent increase in startle amplitude, untreated OVX rats showed a trend toward greatest startle after treatment with 0.02 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. There was no significant difference in startle amplitudes when comparing untreated OVX rats and P-treated OVX rats.
Prepulse Inhibition. Similar to experiment 1, in experiment 2 there was a highly significant main effect of prepulse intensity [F(4,92) = 250.5; p < 0.001; Fig. 4]. There was a significant main effect of dose [F(2,46) = 13.4; p < 0.001], reflecting the dose-dependent reduction of PPI induced by 8-OH-DPAT. In addition, the effect of 8-OH-DPAT depended on the prepulse intensity, as indicated with a significant prepulse by dose interaction [F(8,184) = 2.5; p = 0.014]. Furthermore, there was a significant main effect of group [F(2,23) = 4.3; p = 0.026].
|
With respect to the main effect of dose, pairwise ANOVA showed that, compared with saline treatment, PPI was significantly reduced in rats treated with 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT [F(1,23) = 26.8; p < 0.001], but not with 0.02 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. The significant dose by prepulse interaction reflects that although the 0.5 mg/kg dose of 8-OH-DPAT resulted in a significant disruption at all prepulse intensities (data not shown), inspection of the data reveals that the disruption of PPI tends to be greatest at the lowest prepulse intensities.
In terms of the overall group differences, pairwise ANOVA comparing untreated OVX rats and E/P-treated OVX rats revealed a significant difference in PPI [main effect of group F(1,17) = 7.0; p = 0.017], reflecting the reduction of the effect of 8-OH-DPAT in E/P-treated (Figs. 4 and 5). In addition, whereas treatment with 0.5 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT induced a 34% reduction of average PPI in untreated OVX rats, there was only a 16% reduction in E/P-treated OVX rats (Fig. 5). In contrast, there was no significant difference in PPI between untreated OVX rats and P-treated OVX rats (Fig. 4).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As reported previously (Ke et al., 1997
), ovariectomy of the rats caused a significant decrease in uterus weight and an increase in body weight gain. Uterus weight and body weight gain in E20-treated OVX rats was similar to that in sham-operated controls, demonstrating that this dose of estrogen was effective in reversing the physiological effects of ovariectomy. In E100-treated and E/P-treated OVX rats, uterus weight was increased and body weight gain decreased compared with sham-operated rats, suggesting that these doses were supraphysiological in terms of these parameters. Progesterone treatment did not influence the effects of ovariectomy on body weight and uterus weight, as has been described previously (Bond et al., 1994
).
Previous research has found that estrogen implants similar to the E20 implants used in the present study, restored physiological circulating estrogen levels in OVX rats. Specifically, these implants provided estradiol concentrations equal to the mean level of estradiol present throughout the estrous cycle (16 pg/ml) (Williams and Lipner, 1982
; Albert et al., 1991
). Implants similar to the E100 implants have been found to produce a serum estradiol concentration of 55 pg/ml in OVX rats (Lerant and Freeman, 1998
), which is equivalent to the peak estradiol level reached during noon of proestrous (Williams and Lipner, 1982
; Albert et al., 1991
). Also, it has been shown that in OVX rats, progesterone implants similar to the ones used in the present study have been found to provide concentrations that are approximately two-thirds of the maximum progesterone level reached during the estrous cycle (Williams and Lipner, 1982
; Albert et al., 1991
).
In the present study, there was no difference between the hormone-treated groups in terms of the dose-dependent increase in startle amplitude induced by 8-OH-DPAT treatment. This suggests that ovariectomy and estrogen treatment do not influence the level of acoustic startle and its regulation by 5-HT1A receptors. Thus, any differential effects of hormone treatment on PPI cannot be explained by marked changes in startle amplitudes.
Only the high dose of estrogen treatment prevented the disruption of PPI by 8-OH-DPAT treatment. It is unlikely that the low dose of estrogen was simply ineffective, because this dose had physiological effects, i.e., it reversed uterus and body weight and tended to increase baseline PPI, compared with untreated OVX rats, as published previously (Van den Buuse and Eikelis, 2001
). However, with respect to PPI, it seems that an effect of the low dose of estrogen is only observed in the presence of progesterone. In the present study, neither the low dose of estrogen nor progesterone influenced 5-HT1A receptor-mediated disruptions of PPI when administered alone, but when combined, the effect was similar to that of the high dose of estrogen. It has been suggested that the site of action of 8-OH-DPAT on PPI is via 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Sipes and Geyer, 1995
), increasing dopamine release in the forebrain and subsequently causing a disruption of PPI (Rigdon and Weatherspoon, 1992
). We therefore propose that the effect of estrogen and progesterone occurs in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Both estrogen and progesterone receptors are located in this nucleus in the rat (Alves et al., 1998
). In addition, estrogen induces progesterone receptor expression in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Bethea, 1994
). Previous studies have suggested that estrogen reduces 5-HT1A receptor gene expression and the addition of progesterone enhances this effect on 5-HT1A autoreceptors (Pecins-Thompson and Bethea, 1999
) but reverses the effect of estrogen on the postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors (Birzniece et al., 2001
). Therefore, one explanation for the present results could be that estrogen induces progesterone receptor expression in the dorsal raphe nucleus, and together these hormones significantly inhibit 5-HT1A autoreceptor expression, reducing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on PPI. It could be that the high dose of estrogen does not need the presence of progesterone to exert a similar effect. However, further studies are needed to confirm whether the effect of the different hormone treatments is mediated by alterations in 5-HT1A autoreceptor density, altered postsynaptic signaling mechanisms, or changes in the activity of other transmitter systems "downstream" from the 5-HT1A receptor.
The finding that ovariectomy did not induce any changes in PPI compared with sham-operated rats could indicate that in the intact female rat, estrogen and progesterone do not play a tonic modulatory role on 5-HT1A receptor-mediated regulation of PPI. Koch (1998
) showed a disruption in PPI during the high estrogen (and low progesterone) phase of the estrous cycle, in the intact female rat (Koch, 1998
). Alternatively, the complex nature of hormonal interactions occurring during the estrous cycle, involving hypothalamic, pituitary, and ovarian hormones (Kelly et al., 1999
), may mask the role of estrogen and progesterone, a role that becomes clear only when using a chronic treatment regimen, such as used in the present study. Unlike female rats, castrating male rats reduced 8-OH-DPAT-mediated disruptions of PPI (Gogos and Van den Buuse, 2003
). Treatment of these rats with testosterone restored the effect of 8-OH-DPAT. In addition, the disruption of PPI by 8-OH-DPAT was greater in intact, male rats compared with intact, female rats (Gogos and Van den Buuse, 2003
). Together, these findings support the concept of a facilitatory role of testosterone on 5-HT1A receptor-mediated PPI disruption as opposed to a protective role of estrogen and progesterone.
One methodological limitation of the present study was the chronic treatment regimen of hormone replacement. Chronic treatment was chosen as it has advantages over acute treatment in mimicking the chronic in vivo situation, although a disadvantage is that silastic implants produce stable, continuous hormone release, as opposed to the cyclical levels that occur during the estrous cycle (Albert et al., 1991
). Another limitation of this study is that only 8-OH-DPAT was used as a drug stimulus. Although 8-OH-DPAT is the most selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist available, it also exhibits some agonist activity at the 5-HT7 receptor (Barnes and Sharp, 1999
). The possibility that 8-OH-DPAT acted on the 5-HT7 receptor in the present study is unlikely, however, because previous research has found that 8-OH-DPAT induced disruptions of PPI are reversed with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,135 (Sipes and Geyer, 1995
). Finally, it should be noted that PPI is a model of only one aspect of schizophrenia and the 5-HT1A receptor is only one neurotransmitter receptor implicated in schizophrenia. Future studies should therefore address the interaction of estrogen/progesterone with 5-HT1A receptors in other behavioral models of aspects of this illness as well as the interaction of estrogen/progesterone with other receptors, e.g., dopamine D2 or 5-HT2A receptors.
PPI is a valid animal model of sensorimotor gating which is disrupted in schizophrenia (Geyer and Markou, 1995
) and some other psychiatric illnesses. The findings of the present study on the effects of estrogen and progesterone on PPI may be of importance to sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia. Estrogen and progesterone, administered in the appropriate experimental conditions, seem to modulate 5-HT1A receptor-mediated responses in PPI and thus could play a role in schizophrenia through their effects on the 5-HT1A receptor. Furthermore, the present results may lead to further insight into the causes of gender differences seen in schizophrenia and may help to explain beneficial effects of hormone treatment on symptoms of the illness.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: D, dopamine; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); PPI, prepulse inhibition; P, progesterone; OVX, ovariectomized; E20, 20% 17
-estradiol; E100, 100% 17
-estradiol; E/P, 20% 17
-estradiol and progesterone; 8-OH-DPAT, 8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin; ANOVA, analysis of variance; PP, prepulse; WAY 100,135, N-tert-butyl-3[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl]-2-phenylpropanamide.
Address correspondence to: Dr. M. Van den Buuse, Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, 155 Oak St., Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. E-mail: mvandenbuuse{at}mhri.edu.au
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Albert DJ, Jonik RH, Gorzalka BB, Newlove T, Webb B, and Walsh ML (1991) Serum estradiol concentration required to maintain body weight, attractivity, proceptivity and receptivity in the ovariectomized female rat. Physiol Behav 49: 225-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
Alves SE, Weiland NG, Hayashi S, and McEwen BS (1998) Immunocytochemical localization of nuclear estrogen receptors and progestin receptors within the rat dorsal raphe nucleus. J Comp Neurol 391: 322-334.[Medline]
Barnes NM and Sharp T (1999) A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38: 1083-1152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bethea CL (1994) Regulation of progestin receptors in raphe neurons of steroid-treated monkeys. Neuroendocrinology 60: 50-61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Birzniece V, Johansson IM, Wang MD, Seckl JR, Backstrom T, and Olsson T (2001) Serotonin 5-HT1A receptor mRNA expression in dorsal hippocampus and raphe nuclei after gonadal hormone manipulation in female rats. Neuroendocrinology 74: 135-142.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bond EF, Heitkemper MM, and Jarrett M (1994) Intestinal transit and body weight responses to ovarian hormones and dietary fiber in rats. Nurs Res 43: 18-24.[Medline]
Braff DL, Geyer MA, and Swerdlow NR (2001) Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups and pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology 156: 234-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
Castle DJ, Abel K, Takei N, and Murray RM (1995) Gender differences in schizophrenia: hormonal effect or subtypes? Schizophr Bull 21: 1-12.
Dean B (2000) Signal transmission, rather than reception, is the underlying neurochemical abnormality in schizophrenia. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 34: 560-569.[CrossRef][Medline]
Geyer MA and Markou A (1995) Animal models of psychiatric disorders, in Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress (Bloom FE and Kupfer DJ eds) pp 787-798, Raven Press, New York.
Gogos A and Van den Buuse M (2003) Castration reduces the effect of serotonin-1A receptor stimulation on prepulse inhibition in rats Behav Neurosci 117: 1407-1415.[CrossRef][Medline]
Häfner H, Riecher-Rossler A, An Der Heiden W, Maurer K, Fatkenheuer B, and Loffler W (1993) Generating and testing a causal explanation of the gender difference in age at first onset of schizophrenia. Psychol Med 23: 925-940.[Medline]
Harrison P (1999) The neuropathology of schizophrenia: a critical review of the data and their interpretation. Brain 122: 593-624.
Hashimoto T, Nishino N, Nakai H, and Tanaka C (1991) Increase in serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in prefrontal and temporal cortices of brains from patients with chronic schizophrenia. Life Sci 48: 355-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ke HZ, Chen HK, Simmons HA, Qi H, Crawford DT, Pirie CM, Chidsey-Frink KL, Ma YF, Jee WS, and Thompson DD (1997) Comparative effects of droloxifene, tamoxifen, and estrogen on bone, serum cholesterol and uterine histology in the ovariectomized rat model. Bone 20: 31-39.[Medline]
Kelly SJ, Ostrowski NL, and Wilson MA (1999) Gender differences in brain and behavior: hormonal and neural bases. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64: 655-664.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koch M (1998) Sensorimotor gating changes across the estrous cycle in female rats. Physiol Behav 64: 625-628.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kulkarni J, Riedel A, de Castella AR, Fitzgerald PB, Rolfe TJ, Taffe J, and Burger H (2001) Estrogen - a potential treatment for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 48: 137-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lerant A and Freeman ME (1998) Ovarian steroids differentially regulate the expression of PRL-R in neuroendocrine dopaminergic neuron populations: a double label confocal microscopic study. Brain Res 802: 141-154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oades RD and Schepker R (1994) Serum gonadal steroid hormones in young schizophrenic patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19: 373-385.[CrossRef][Medline]
Österlund MK and Hurd YL (1998) Acute 17 beta-estradiol treatment downregulates serotonin 5-HT1A receptor mRNA expression in the limbic system of female rats. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 55: 169-172.[Medline]
Pecins-Thompson M and Bethea CL (1999) Ovarian steroid regulation of serotonin-1A autoreceptor messenger RNA expression in the dorsal raphe of rhesus macaques. Neuroscience 89: 267-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Perry W and Braff DL (1994) Information-processing deficits and thought disorder in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 151: 363-367.[Abstract]
Riecher-Rossler A, Hafner H, Stumbaum M, Maurer K, and Schmidt R (1994) Can estradiol modulate schizophrenic symptomatology? Schizophr Bull 20: 203-214.
Rigdon GC and Weatherspoon JK (1992) 5-Hydroxytryptamine1a receptor agonists block prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263: 486-493.
Rollema H, Lu Y, Schmidt AW, Sprouse JS, and Zorn SH (2000) 5-HT1A receptor activation contributes to ziprasidone-induced dopamine release in the rat prefrontal cortex. Biol Psychiatry 48: 229-237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rupprecht R, Koch M, Montkowski A, Lancel M, Faulhaber J, Harting J, and Spanagel R (1999) Assessment of neuroleptic-like properties of progesterone. Psychopharmacology 143: 29-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seeman MV and Lang M (1990) The role of estrogens in schizophrenia gender differences. Schizophr Bull 16: 185-194.
Simpson MD, Lubman DI, Slater P, and Deakin JF (1996) Autoradiography with [3H]8-OH-DPAT reveals increases in 5-HT1A receptors in ventral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 39: 919-928.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sipes TA and Geyer MA (1995) 8-OH-DPAT disruption of prepulse inhibition in rats: reversal with (+)WAY 100,135 and localization of site of action. Psychopharmacology 117: 41-48.[CrossRef][Medline]
Suzuki M, Nishihara M, and Takahashi M (1995) Hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression during rat estrous cycle. Endocr J 42: 789-796.[Medline]
Swerdlow NR, Braff DL, Bakshi VP, and Geyer MA (1996) An animal model of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia predicts antipsychotic drug action, in Antipsychotics (Csernansky JG ed) pp 289-312, Springer, Berlin.
Van den Buuse M and Eikelis N (2001) Estrogen increases prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 425: 33-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Williams AT and Lipner H (1982) The contribution of gonadostatin (inhibin-F) to the control of gonadotropin secretion in a simulated estrous cycle in steroid-treated ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 111: 231-237.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Deurveilher, E. M. Cumyn, T. Peers, B. Rusak, and K. Semba Estradiol replacement enhances sleep deprivation-induced c-Fos immunoreactivity in forebrain arousal regions of ovariectomized rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): R1328 - R1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Brown Jr Effects of Bisphenol-A and Other Endocrine Disruptors Compared With Abnormalities of Schizophrenia: An Endocrine-Disruption Theory of Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, January 31, 2008; (2008) sbm147v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van den Buuse and A. Gogos Differential Effects of Antipsychotic Drugs on Serotonin-1A Receptor-Mediated Disruption of Prepulse Inhibition J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2007; 320(3): 1224 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||