![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
4
1/
4
7 Antagonist Differentiates between the Low-Affinity States of
4
1 and
4
7: Characterization of Divalent Cation Dependence
Pharmacology (L.A.E., J.C., U.K., P.A.D.), High Throughput Screening (C.M.), Immunology and Rheumatology (G.V.R., E.M., R.A.M.), Medicinal Chemistry (L.S.L., S.E.d.L., D.N.Y., G.Y., W.K.H.), Drug Metabolism (D.C.D., C.E.R., M.A.W., A.N.J.), Merck & Co., Rahway, New Jersey; Aventis (J.A.S.), Bridgewater, New Jersey; and Biogen, Inc. (R.B.P., D.M.S., W.-C.L., M.A.C.), Cambridge, Massachusetts
Received December 4, 2002; accepted May 22, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
1/
4
7
dual antagonist, 35S-compound 1, was used as a model ligand to
study the effect of divalent cations on the activation state and ligand
binding properties of
4 integrins. In the presence of 1 mM
each Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound to
several cell lines expressing both
4
1 and
4
7, but
2S-[(1-benzenesulfonyl-pyrrolidine-2S-carbonyl)-amino]-4-[4-methyl-2S-(methyl-{2-[4-(3-o-tolyl-ureido)-phenyl]-acetyl}-amino)
pentanoylamino]-butyric acid (BIO7662), a specific
4
1 antagonist, completely inhibited
35S-compound 1 binding, suggesting that
4
1 was responsible for the observed
binding. 35S-Compound 1 bound RPMI-8866 cells expressing
predominantly
4
7 with a
KD of 1.9 nM in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+, and
binding was inhibited only 29% by BIO7662, suggesting that the probe is a
potent antagonist of activated
4
7. With
Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound Jurkat cells
expressing primarily
4
1 with a
KD of 18 nM. In contrast, the binding of
35S-compound 1 to Mn2+-activated Jurkat cells occurred
slowly, reaching equilibrium by 60 min, and failed to dissociate within
another 60 min. The ability of four
4
1/
4
7
antagonists to block binding of activated
4
1 or
4
7
to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 or mucosal addressin cell adhesion
molecule-1, respectively, or to 35S-compound 1 was measured, and a
similar rank order of potency was observed for native ligand and probe.
Inhibition of 35S-compound 1 binding to
4
1 in Ca2+/Mg2+ was
used to identify nonselective antagonists among these four. These studies
demonstrate that
4
1 and
4
7 have distinct binding properties for the
same ligand, and binding parameters are dependent on the state of integrin
activation in response to different divalent cations.
4
1 and
4
7 are members of a small subset of
integrins that can also mediate rolling
(Bargatze et al., 1995
4
1 and
4
7 in leukocyte-mediated inflammation in
animal models (Foster, 1996
4, Elan/Biogen) resulted in
remission for Crohn's disease patients
(Gordon et al., 2001
4 integrins are constitutively expressed on a variety of
leukocytes and can bind to shared or distinct binding partners.
4
1 is expressed on lymphocytes,
eosinophils, and monocytes and mediates adhesion to vascular cell adhesion
molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expressed on the endothelium and to the connecting
segment-1 (CS-1) subdomain of human fibronectin in the extracellular matrix.
4
1 and
4
7 are coexpressed on peripheral blood
leukocytes, and
4
7 is highly expressed on a
discrete subpopulation of gut-homing memory T and B lymphocytes, mediating
lymphocyte adhesion within the vasculature of the gastrointestinal tract,
where its major ligand, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1),
is preferentially expressed on high endothelial venules
(Butcher, 1999
). Although both
4
7 and
4
1 can bind VCAM-1 and CS-1,
4
1 does not bind MAdCAM-1, and
4
7 binds to MAdCAM-1 with higher affinity
than to VCAM-1 or to CS-1 (Berlin et al.,
1993
).
Key motifs for the binding of
4
7 and
4
1 to native ligands have been defined as
leucine-aspartic acid-threonine in MAdCAM-1
(Viney et al., 1996
),
isoleucine-aspartic acid-serine in VCAM-1
(Wang et al., 1995
), and
leucin-aspartic acid-valine in CS-1
(Wayner and Kovach, 1992
).
Small molecule antagonists of
4
7 that mimic
the LDT motif have been described that block the binding of
4
7-expressing cells to MAdCAM-Ig in the
presence of Mn2+ (Carson et al.,
1997
; Shroff et al.,
1998
; Martin et al.,
1999
; Harriman et al.,
2000
; Egger et al.,
2002
). Similarly, antagonists of
4
1 have been reported to block binding of
Mn2+-activated (Jackson et al.,
1997
; Vanderslice et al.,
1997
; Lin et al.,
1998
; Hagmann et al.,
2001
; Muller et al.,
2001
) and unactivated
4
1 (Chen
et al., 1999
,
2001
) to ligand in vitro.
The essential role of cation-binding sites in regulating integrin function
is known, but the coordination of each cation-binding site and the individual
role of different metal cations is not well understood
(Leitinger et al., 2000
). All
integrin
-subunits have seven homologous 60-amino acid repeats at the N
terminus that have been predicted to fold into a
-propeller structure
(Shimaoka et al., 2002
), and
three to four putative Ca2+ binding sites are located within
repeats 4 through 7. A metal ion-dependent activation site motif is a unique
Mg2+/Mn2+ binding site located in the I-domain of the
-subunit, and divalent cation bound at this site has a structural role
in coordinating the binding of ligand to the I-domain containing integrins.
Although
4 does not contain an I-domain, an I-like domain
that contains a metal ion-dependent activation site-like motif is present in
the
-chain of all integrins. Although the effect of divalent cations on
4
7-ligand interactions has not been
extensively characterized, recent studies have shown that Ca2+ is
essential to support rolling under shear flow, whereas Mg2+ can
promote firm adhesion of cells expressing
4
7 to MAdCAM-1
(de Chateau et al., 2001
).
To assess the effect of divalent cations on the activation state of
4 integrins expressed on human lymphocytes, we used a novel
dual
4
1/
4
7
antagonist, 35S-compound 1 (Fig.
1), as a model ligand. A similar approach has been used to study
multiple activation states of
4
1 through
their different affinities for a small molecule ligand (Chen et al.,
1999
,
2001
), but the binding of a
small molecule ligand to different activation states of
4b7 has not been described. These studies provide
new information that
4
1 and
4
7 have distinct binding affinities for the
same small molecule ligand, and binding is dependent on the state of integrin
activation in response to different divalent cations.
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
7
and
4
1.
Antibodies and Cell Lines. The following purified monoclonal
antibodies were obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA): 4B4 (mouse
anti-human
1), FIB27 (rat anti-mouse
7 that
cross-reacts with human
7), and isotype controls (mouse IgG1,
rat IgG2b). HP2/1 (mouse anti-human
4) was obtained from
Coulter/Immunotech (Hialeah, FL). The following cell lines were used:
RPMI-8866 cells (human B cell line) obtained from John A. Wilkins (University
of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada); Jurkat and HUT-78 (human T cell lines) from
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA); and
K562/
4
7 cells, a stably transfected human
erythroleukemia cell-line obtained from David J. Erle (University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA).
Binding of Native Ligands to Cells Expressing
4
7 and
4
1. A ligand binding assay for
Mn2+-activated
4
7 has been
described previously (Egger et al.,
2002
) and was performed by incubating RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x
105 cells/well) with <200 pM iodinated human MAdCAM-Ig.
Similarly, a ligand binding assay for activated
4
1 was performed by incubating Jurkat cells
(5 x 105 cells/well) expressing
4
1 with <100 pM iodinated VCAM-Ig in the
presence of Mn2+, as described previously
(Hagmann et al., 2001
).
Purified VCAM-Ig and MAdCAM-Ig were labeled with 125I using Bolton
Hunter reagent and purified using HPLC gel filtration chromatography, and
specific radioactivities were in excess of 1,100 Ci/mmol. Compounds were
evaluated by incubating radioligand, compound (prepared in DMSO; <1% DMSO
final concentration), cells, and binding buffer (25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3
mM KCl, 2 mM glucose, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4) containing 1 mM
MnCl2 at 25°C for 30 min (
4
1
assays) or 45 min (
4
7 assays) in a 96-well
Millipore (Bedford, MA) multiscreen MHVBN filtration plate. After filtration
and a single wash with binding buffer, the filtration plates were dried and
transferred to adaptor plates. After adding 100 µl of Microscint-20
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) to each well, the plates were sealed,
placed on a shaker for 1 min, and counted on a PerkinElmer Top-Count. Wells
containing cells + radioligand + 1 µM compound or DMSO alone served as
controls to calculate 100 and 0% inhibition, respectively.
Binding of a Dual
4
1/
4
7
Antagonist Probe, 35S-Compound 1, to Cells Expressing
4
7 or
4
1. Equilibrium binding studies were
performed by incubating either RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x 105
cells/tube) expressing
4
7 or Jurkat cells
(5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing
4
1 in binding buffer containing either 1 mM
MnCl2 or 1 mM each CaCl2 and MgCl2 with 0 to
30 nM (for
4
7 studies) or 0 to 60 nM (for
4
1 studies) 35S-compound 1 in
siliconized Eppendorf microfuge tubes for 1 h at 4°C. All
35S-compound 1 binding studies with RPMI-8866 cells were conducted
in the presence or absence of a specific
4
1
antagonist, 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et al.,
2001
), to selectively block
4
1.
The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000g for 3 min,
washed twice with binding buffer at 4°C, transferred to a scintillation
vial containing 5 ml of CytoScint (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA), and
cell-associated 35S-compound 1 was measured by scintillation
counting. Tubes containing cells + radioligand + 1 µM compound 1 or DMSO
alone served as controls to calculate 100 and 0% inhibition, respectively.
Data were analyzed by nonlinear regression to calculate
Bmax and KD values.
Kinetic analysis of 35S-compound 1 binding to cells expressing
4 was performed by incubating RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x
105 cells/tube) expressing
4
7 or
Jurkat cells (5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing
4
1 in binding buffer containing either 1 mM
MnCl2 or 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 with 6.5
nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 in siliconized
Eppendorf microfuge tubes for 2 to 120 min at 4°C. RPMI-8866 cells were
pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et
al., 2001
) as described above. Binding was terminated by adding 5
µM compound 1 at each time point. Cells were immediately transferred to an
ice-bath for 10 min, pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000g for 3 min,
and cell associated 35S-compound 1 was determined by scintillation
counting as described above.
When the rate of 35S-compound 1 dissociation was evaluated, reaction mixtures were incubated with 6.5 nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 for 1 h at 4°C, followed by the addition of 5 µM compound 1 for another 2 to 120 min. At each time point, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with 4°C binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM each CaCl2 and MgCl2, and counted for cell-associated 35S-compound 1 as described above. On rates (kon), off rates (koff), and KD values for the binding of 35S-compound 1 were determined from kinetic measurements. Prism 3.0 software was used to calculate kobs (min-1) and koff (min-1) values from the on and off rate binding curves, respectively: kon (min-1 nM-1) = (kobs - koff)/[ligand], and KD (M) = koff/kon.
A 35S-compound 1 binding assay for activated or unactivated
4 was performed by incubating either RPMI-8866 cells (7.5
x 105 cells/well), K562/
4
7
cells (1 x 105 cells/well), HUT-78 cells (5 x
105 cells/well), or Jurkat cells (5 x 105
cells/well) in binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM
CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 with less than 150 pM
35S-compound 1 for
4
7 or
4
1 studies. RPMI-8866 cells were pretreated
with 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et al.,
2001
) as described above. Test compounds were evaluated by
incubating radioligand, compound, cells, and binding buffer at 25°C for 45
min in a 96-well multiscreen filtration plate on a shaking platform. After
filtration and a single wash with binding buffer containing either 1 mM
MnCl2 or 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2, the
plates were processed and counted as described above for the binding of native
ligand to cells expressing
4. Nonspecific binding (NSB) was
determined by the addition of 1 µM compound 1.
Quantitative FACS Analysis. A total of 106 RPMI-8866 or
Jurkat cells were incubated for 30 min on ice in FACS buffer
(phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM each CaCl2 and
MgCl2, 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml goat IgG, and 0.05%
sodium azide) containing saturating levels of the following
phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies: FIB504 rat anti-mouse
7
(2.4 µg/ml; cross-reacts with human
7), MAR4 mouse
anti-human
1 (80 µg/ml), 9F10 mouse anti-human
4 (10 µg/ml), mIgG1 isotype, and rIgG2a isotype controls.
All phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies were obtained from BD PharMingen.
Cells were washed in FACS buffer and resuspended in FACS buffer containing 1
µg/ml propidium iodide. Cells were analyzed by a FACScan flow cytometer (BD
Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Standardized quantum R-phycoerythrin
microbeads (Flow Cytometry Standards Corp., Fishers, IN) were analyzed by flow
cytometry and used to create a calibration curve that relates mean
fluorescence intensities to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorescence for
use in calculating receptor density values.
Statistical Analysis. Curve fits and statistics were performed using KaleidaGraph (Synergy, Reading, PA) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) with a one-way analysis of variance (nonparametric test) followed by a Tukey's post test if overall P < 0.05, and a paired t test was used when comparing only two sets of data. Data were analyzed by nonlinear regression with an equation for one-site binding to calculate Bmax and KD values. Nonlinear regression analysis was used with equations for one-phase exponential association with no weighting or one-phase exponential decay with no weighting to obtain curve fits for association and dissociation plots, respectively. R2 values were used as an indication of the goodness of fit, and both single- and double-phase exponential equations were compared to obtain the best fit. Double reciprocal plots were analyzed by linear regression analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
1 and
4
7 Ligand Binding Assays. Compound 1
(Fig. 1) represents one of a
structural class of potent
4
1 antagonists
(Hagmann et al., 2001
4
7, the ability of this compound to inhibit
binding of 125I-hMAdCAM-Ig to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of
the divalent cation Mn2+ was evaluated using methods described
previously (Egger et al.,
2002
4
7 (
60,000
4
7 receptors/cell), but low levels of
4
1 (
4,000
4
1 receptors/cell), as demonstrated by
quantitative flow cytometry (Fig.
2A). In addition, the specificity of MAdCAM-Ig binding to
4
7 on the RPMI-8866 cells has been
confirmed by demonstrating that anti-
4 and
anti-
7 mAbs block binding, whereas an anti-
1
mAb does not block binding (Egger et al.,
2002
4
1 expressed on the RPMI-8866 cell line do
not bind VCAM-Ig in the presence of anti-
7 mAbs
and1mMMn2+ or1mMCa2+/Mg2+ (data not shown).
Thus, RPMI-8866 cells can be used to evaluate the potency of compounds in
blocking binding of
4
7, but not
4
1, to MAdCAM-Ig. Compound 1 inhibited the
binding of MAdCAM-Ig to
4
7 with an
IC50 of 1.1 nM (Table
1).
|
|
To compare the potency of compound 1 for blockade of
4
1 under similar conditions, the ability of
the compound to inhibit 125I-hVCAM-Ig binding to Jurkat cells
expressing
4
1 in the presence of the
divalent cation Mn2+ was performed as described previously
(Egger et al., 2002
). For this
assay, Jurkat cells, a human T cell line, were chosen, because they express
high levels of
4
1 (
90,000
4
1 receptors/cell), but low levels of
4
7 (
7,000
4
7 receptors/cell)
(Fig. 2B). Specificity of
VCAM-Ig binding to
4
1 on Jurkat cells, was
confirmed previously using anti-
4 and
anti-
1 mAbs to completely abrogate binding, in the absence of
inhibition by anti-
7 mAb
(Egger et al., 2002
). The low
level of
4
7 expressed on the Jurkat cell
line does not bind MAdCAM-Ig in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ or 1 mM
Ca2+/Mg2+ (data not shown), indicating that Jurkat cells
can be used to evaluate the potency of compounds in blocking binding of
4
1, but not
4
7, to VCAM-Ig. Compound 1 inhibited the
binding of VCAM-Ig to
4
1 with an
IC50 of 0.10 nM (Table
1). Thus, compound 1 is a potent dual
4
1/
4
7
antagonist.
Divalent Cation-Dependent Binding of a Radiolabeled
4
1/
4
7
Antagonist Probe, 35S-compound 1, to RPMI-8866 Cells,
K562/
4
7 Cells, and HUT-78 Cells.
4-ligand interactions are dependent on divalent cations,
which modulate the affinity state of the integrins for their ligands
(Leitinger et al., 2000
). To
test the divalent cation dependence of binding, an assay was developed to
measure the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells expressing
activated or unactivated
4
7 in the presence
of the divalent cations Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+,
respectively (Fig. 3). In the
presence of 1 mM Mn2+, RPMI-8866 cells bound
35S-compound 1 with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of
12 (Fig. 3A). In the presence
of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound
RPMI-8866 cells with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 6. Specific
binding was not observed in the presence of either 1 mM Ca2+ or 1
mM Mg2+ alone (data not shown). The inclusion of 10 mM EDTA in the
binding reaction abrogated specific binding, as expected.
|
To determine whether the low level of
4
1
present on RPMI-8866 cells (Fig.
2A) contributed to the observed binding of 35S-compound
1, binding was measured with or without 100 nM BIO7662 added to specifically
block
4
1
(Fig. 3A). BIO7662, a highly
selective inhibitor of
4
1
(Chen et al., 2001
;
Pepinsky et al., 2002
;
Leone et al., 2003
), was used
for these studies because none of the available anti-
4 or
anti-
1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies blocked the binding
of 35S-compound 1 to
4
1 even at
concentrations up to 3.3 µg/ml (data not shown). BIO7662 (100 nM) was
selected to completely saturate
4
1
(IC50 of 0.03 nM in the
4
1/125IVCAM-Ig binding assay;
Table 1) without interfering
with
4
7 (IC50 of 3.34 µM in
the
4
7/125I-MAdCAM-Ig binding
assay; Table 1). In the
presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, RPMI-8866 cells bound
35S-compound 1 (input counts
150 pM) with a ratio of specific
to nonspecific binding of 8 (Fig.
3A), and binding was reduced by 29% compared with cells not
treated with BIO7662, indicating that, as expected, most of the total counts
bound are due to binding to
4
7. Total
binding in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and BIO7662
was not significantly different from background binding, suggesting that low
levels of unactivated
4
1 expressed on
RPMI-8866 cells are responsible for the binding of 35S-compound 1
under these conditions. Comparison of the specific binding of
35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells measured in the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+/Mg2+ with or without BIO7662 was significantly
different with a P value < 0.01. Furthermore, when incubating
RPMI-8866 cells with 0 to 30 nM 35S-compound 1 in the presence of 1
mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, no significant binding
above background was observed (data not shown). The results shown in
Fig. 3A indicate that
4
7 on RPMI-8866 cells requires
Mn2+ to support binding of 35S-compound 1 and that the
unactivated state of the receptor does not support binding.
To determine whether the inability of 35S-compound 1 to bind
unactivated
4
7 was dependent on cell type,
we measured binding to K562 cells stably transfected with
4
7
(K562/
4
7) in the presence of different
divalent cations. As demonstrated by quantitative FACS analysis,
K562/
4
7 cells express
200,000
copies/cell of
4
1 and
200,000
copies/cell of
4
7 (data not shown). In the
presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662,
K562/
4
7 cells bound 35S-compound
1 with a 19-fold ratio of specific to nonspecific binding, and binding was
reduced by 63% compared with cells not treated with BIO7662
(Fig. 3B). Thus, the binding of
35S-compound 1 to activated
K562/
4
7 cells is mediated by both
4
1 and
4
7, with each integrin having a similar
contribution to the total binding. In the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound
K562/
4
7 cells with a ratio of specific to
nonspecific binding of 31-fold (Fig.
3B), but pretreating the cells with 100 nM BIO7662 abrogated
binding (Fig. 3B), indicating
that K562/
4
7 cell binding to
35S-compound 1 is mediated solely by unactivated
4
1. To extend the above-mentioned findings
to another cell line, the effect of divalent cations on the binding of
35S-compound to HUT-78 cells was evaluated. By FACS analysis,
HUT-78 cells express equal proportions of both
4
1 and
4
7 (data not shown), and the relative
receptor density of
4
7 was similar to
levels observed on RPMI-8866 cells (Erle
et al., 1994
). Mn2+-activated HUT-78 cells bound to
35S-compound 1 with a 10- or 2-fold ratio of specific to
nonspecific binding in the absence or presence of 100 nM BIO7662, respectively
(Fig. 3C). In the presence of 1
mM Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound
unactivated HUT-78 cells with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of
9-fold, but failed to bind unactivated cells after pretreatment with 100 nM
BIO7662 (Fig. 3C), indicating
that unactivated
4
1 is also completely
responsible for HUT-78 cell binding to 35S-compound 1. Thus, the
binding properties of 35S-compound 1 for different activation
states of
4 are not dependent on cell type or expression
levels of
4
1 relative to
4
7, but rather are dependent on the
activation state of the integrins.
Binding Kinetics of 35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866 Cells.
After three cell lines expressing both
4
1
and
4
7 were evaluated, subsequent studies
on
4
7 focused on characterizing the binding
of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells that predominantly express
4
7. To determine whether an assay could be
developed to study both the association and dissociation of unlabeled
compounds from binding to activated
4
7,
equilibrium and kinetic studies for the binding of 35S-compound 1
to
4
7 were performed in the presence of
Mn2+ with cells pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662
(Fig. 4). Binding of
35S-compound 1 was dose-dependent and saturable with maximal
binding to
4
7 observed at approximately 10
nM. Assuming that each receptor bound one ligand, specific counts bound at
saturation provided a direct measure of
4
7
expression levels. Based on the calculation of Bmax
values, the RPMI-8866 cells used in these studies had approximately 43,000
copies of
4
7/cell, which is in good
agreement with the receptor density determined by quantitative FACS analysis
(Fig. 2A).
|
The quadratic shape of the binding curve in
Fig. 4 suggested that the
apparent KD for binding was small compared with the
concentration of
4
7 (360 pM) present in the
binding assay, which is consistent with reports that measure binding of small
molecule antagonists to
4
1 (Chen et al.,
1999
,
2001
). Based on this
observation, it was evident that the saturation binding curves measured
titration of the receptor to full occupancy, and a kinetic assessment of
affinity was used to measure actual affinity constants. In the presence of 1
mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, binding occurred rapidly with a
kon of 0.05 nM-1 min-1, reached
equilibrium within 10 min, and reversed with a koff of
0.09 min-1 (Fig. 5).
Thus, a KD value of 1.9 nM was calculated based on the
binding kinetics of compound 1 to activated
4
7.
|
Effect of Divalent Cation Concentration on the Binding of
35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866 Cells. To elucidate the role of
divalent cations on integrin activation, the effects of metal ion
concentration on the binding of the 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866
cells were examined. Cells were pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 to block
4
1, and binding was measured as a function
of changing Mn2+ or Mg2+ concentrations from 0.03 to 100
mM (Fig. 6A). Mn2+
enhanced the binding of the 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells with
an EC50 of 0.5 mM, whereas Mg2+ only enhanced binding at
higher concentrations (3-fold increase in specific binding at 5 mM;
Fig. 6A).
|
To determine whether Ca2+ can affect the ability of
Mg2+ or Mn2+ to activate
4
7, RPMI-8866 cells were treated with 100
nM BIO7662 and increasing concentrations of Ca2+ (0.04-5 mM) in
combination with 5 mM Mn2+ or5mMMg2+, to achieve maximal
activation and partial activation, respectively. In the presence of 5 mM
Mn2+, Ca2+ at 1.25 mM and 5 mM inhibited the binding of
35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells by 35 and 65%, respectively
(Fig. 6B). Similarly, when
combined with 5 mM Mg2+,Ca2+ at 1.25 and 5 mM inhibited
the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells by 38 and 51%,
respectively.
To further explore the interaction between Mn2+ and
Ca2+, the binding of 35S-compound 1 to
4
7 was measured in the presence of
increasing concentrations of Ca2+ (0.1-100 mM) in combination with
three different fixed concentrations of Mn2+ (0.2, 1, and 5 mM).
Ca2+ inhibited the binding of 35S-compound 1 to
RPMI-8866 cells with IC50 values of 1.0, 4.0, and 14.0 mM,
respectively. A double reciprocal plot of these data
(Fig. 6D) indicated that the
inhibition observed by Ca2+ in the presence of Mn2+ is
noncompetitive in nature, and this lack of competition is between
Ca2+ and Mn2+ rather than ligand.
Divalent Cation-Dependent Binding 35S-Compound 1 to Jurkat
Cells. To understand how divalent cations regulate the activation state of
4
1, an assay was developed to measure the
binding of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells expressing activated or
unactivated
4
1 in the presence of the
divalent cations Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+,
respectively (Fig. 7). Binding
of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells was dose-dependent and reached
saturation at 5 nM. Because available
anti-
4
1 mAb did not compete with the
binding of 35S-compound 1, the specificity of
35S-compound 1 binding to
4
1 was
determined by direct competition with unlabeled compound 1 at 1 µM.
Specific counts bound at saturation provided a direct measure of
4
1 expression levels, and, based on this
value, Jurkat cells used in these studies have approximately 64,000 copies (in
Mn2+) and 57,000 copies (in Ca2+/Mg2+) of
4
1/cell, which is in agreement with the
receptor density determined by quantitative FACS analysis
(Fig. 2B). Binding was
dependent on the presence of divalent cations, and was blocked in the presence
of 10 mM EDTA (data not shown).
|
As observed for the binding of 35S-compound 1 to
4
7, the apparent KD for
binding seemed to be small compared with the concentration of
4
1 (350 and 320 pM, respectively) present
in the binding assay (Fig. 7).
The kinetic assessment of binding of compound 1 to
4
1 in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+
indicated that binding occurred very slowly, reaching equilibrium by 60 min,
and dissociation was not observed after another 60 min of incubation
(Fig. 8A), or even after
another 180 min (48,036 specific cpm bound after 240 min of total incubation
time; data not shown). In the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+/Mg2+, binding occurred with a
kon of 0.01 nM-1 min-1, reaching
equilibrium within 10 min, and dissociation was rapid, with a
koff of 0.24 min-1, resulting in a
KD of 18 nM (Fig.
8B). Because the saturation binding curves measured titration of
the receptor to full occupancy, the KD values obtained
from the kinetic binding curves represent the actual binding affinity.
Although binding of the protein ligand 125I-VCAM-Ig requires an
activated state of
4
1, achieved by adding 1
mM Mn2+, 35S-compound 1 is observed to bind both
activated and unactivated states of
4
1.
Although similar association rates were observed for the binding of
35S-compound 1 to unactivated and activated
4
1, dissociation rates were dependent on
the activation state of the integrin, with dissociation from the activated
receptor indiscernible under the conditions of the assay.
|
Ability of Antagonists of
4
1/
4
7 to
Block the Binding of Native Ligand or 35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866
or Jurkat Cells. After demonstrating that 35S-compound 1 can be
used to analyze
4 interactions on both RPMI-8866 and Jurkat
cell lines, we were interested in determining the potency of four
4
1/
4
7
antagonists. Compounds were initially evaluated for their ability to block
125I-MAdCAM-Ig binding to RPMI-8866 cells and
125I-VCAM-Ig binding to Jurkat cells, in the presence of
Mn2+ (Table 1).
Compound 2, a recently described
4
1
antagonist (Hagmann et al.,
2001
), and compound 3, a structurally related analog, inhibited
binding to both
4
1 and
4
7
(Table 1). An inactive analog,
compound 4 (Hagmann et al.,
2001
; Egger et al.,
2002
), did not inhibit binding when tested at concentrations up to
100 µM, demonstrating the importance of specific structural features to the
activities of compounds 1, 2, and 3 (Kopka
et al., 2002
; Table
1). TR14035 (Fig.
1) has been reported to potently inhibit both
4
1 and
4
7
(Martin et al., 1999
; Sircar
et al.,
1999a
,1999b
;
Egger et al., 2002
), and this
was confirmed (Table 1).
After evaluating the potency of compounds in conventional
4-ligand binding assays, we determined the potency of the
same four compounds to block 35S-compound 1 binding to RPMI-8866
cells in the presence of Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662. The concentration
of 35S-compound 1 used for the binding assay was maintained at less
than 150 pM, based on an IC50 of 400 pM for competition by
unlabeled compound 1 (Table 1),
and the results for the compounds tested are shown in
Table 1. Although a small
(5-fold or less) shift toward reduced potency in the 35S-compound
1/
4
7 assay was observed, a similar rank
order of compounds (cmpd 1
TR14035 > cmpd 2 > cmpd 3 >> cmpd
4) was maintained for the IC50 values when the
35S-compound 1/
4
7 and
125IMAdCAM-Ig/
4
7 binding assays
were compared.
The ability of the same four compounds to block 35S-compound 1
binding to Jurkat cells expressing activated
4
1 in the presence of Mn2+ was
also measured. The concentration of 35S-compound 1 used for the
binding assay was maintained at less than 150 pM, based on an IC50
of 2.5 and 2.3 nM for competition by unlabeled compound 1 with activated and
unactivated Jurkat cells, respectively
(Table 1), and the potency of
compounds tested is shown in Table
1. Despite the overall shift toward reduced potency (26- to
79-fold less potent) in the 35S-compound
1/
4
1 assay, the same rank order of compound
IC50 values (cmpd 1 = cmpd 2 = TR14035 > cmpd 3 >> cmpd 4)
was observed for the 35S-compound
1/
4
1 and
125I-VCAM-Ig/
4
1 binding
assays.
The same four compounds were titrated for inhibition of
35S-compound 1 binding to Jurkat cells expressing unactivated
4
1 in the presence of
Ca2+/Mg2+. As described in
Table 1, the activities of
compounds 2 and 3 were within 2-fold of the values observed in the
35S-compound 1/activated
4
1
binding assay in the presence of Mn2+. As expected, compound 4 did
not block binding of
35S-compound 1 to unactivated
4
1 at concentrations up to 1 mM
(Table 1). Nonselective
compounds, those that have relatively equal potency for activated and
unactivated
4
1, would be expected to follow
the same rank order in both assays. Using this criterion, compounds 2 and 3
were identified as dual antagonists that are nonselective for
4
1, whereas TR14035 had a 17-fold greater
potency for inhibiting binding to activated
4
1 than for unactivated
4
1, making it a dual antagonist that is
selective for activated
4
1.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
7- and
4
1-ligand interactions in the presence of
different metal cations. 35S-Compound 1 bound both unactivated and
activated states of
4
1 that occur in
suspension in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+ or
Mn2+, respectively, but only bound activated
4
7. Binding kinetics revealed that
35S-compound 1 dissociated from activated
4
7 and unactivated
4
1, but failed to dissociate from activated
4
1 in the time frame observed. Although
radiolabeled probes have been used to study the function of
4
1-ligand interactions (Chen et al.,
1999
4
1/
4
7
antagonist can be used to elucidate the effect of divalent cations on both
4
7- and
4
1-ligand interactions, defining distinct
binding properties of the probe for each integrin.
Integrins are known to exist in multiple affinity states in the presence of
different divalent cations (Shimaoka et
al., 2002
). For many integrin-ligand interactions, including those
of
1,
2, and
3 integrins,
the most efficient binding to immobilized ligand occurs in the presence of
Mn2+, with less binding in the presence of Mg2+, and
little or no binding in the presence of Ca2+
(Dransfield et al., 1992
;
Mould et al., 1995
;
Chen et al., 1999
;
Chigaev et al., 2001
). Binding
of cells expressing
E
7 to E-cadherin is
observed with 1 mM Mn2+/Mg2+/Ca2+ or with
EGTA plus 10 mM Mg2+, whereas negligible binding occurs in the
presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+
(Higgins et al., 1998
). These
published results are consistent with observations in this report where an
8-fold difference in affinity was detected between the binding of
35S-compound 1 to Mn2+-activated
4
7 and
4
7 in the presence of
Ca2+/Mg2+ (Fig.
3A with BIO7662). Mn2+ enhanced the binding of
35S-compound 1 to
4
7 with an
EC50 of 0.5 mM (Fig.
6A), whereas 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ supported
binding to
4
1, but not
4
7 (Figs.
3A and
7B). Ca2+ alone did
not support binding to
4
7, and
nonphysiological levels of Mg2+ were required to stimulate binding
to
4
7
(Fig. 6A).
The 29% reduction in the binding of compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells in
Mn2+ with 100 nM BIO7662 (Fig.
3A) added was surprising, because only a 5 to 10% drop in total
counts bound was expected due to the binding to
4
1 (Fig.
2A). One explanation for this finding is that with 100 nM BIO7662
added, a small fraction of the
4
7 was
occupied by BIO7662 and blocked binding of 35S-compound 1. To test
this possibility, we reevaluated the binding of BIO7662 to
4
7, but on JY cells, a human B cell line,
which expresses high levels of
4
7 and no
detectible
4
1. First, binding was evaluated
using radiolabeled BIO7662. No specific measurable binding was observed with
10 nM 35S-BIO7662, supporting the observation that the affinity of
BIO7662 for
4
7 is low. Second, the
IC50 of BIO7662 for
4
7 was
measured in an adhesion format in which the ability of BIO7662 to block
binding of fluorescently labeled JY cells to plates coated with
N-[4-(6-aminohexane-1-sulfonylamino)-2,6-dichlorobenzoyl]-4-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-L-phenylalanine
trifluoroacetate-bovine serum albumin conjugate was quantified.
N-[4-(6-Aminohexane-1-sulfonylamino)-2,6-dichlorobenzoyl]-4-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-L-phenylalanine
trifluoroacetate (Pepinsky et al.,
2002
), an analog of compound 1 that had been engineered to contain
a linker for cross-linking, was used for these studies. IC50 values
in this assay of 10 µM in 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ buffer and 1
µMin1mMMn2+ verify that BIO7662 is a poor inhibitor of
4
7. Although these studies support the
integrin selectivity data for BIO7662, the separation under activating
conditions between the IC50 of BIO7662 in the adhesion assay (1
µM) and the amount added to prevent
4
1
binding, 100 nM, was not as great as was predicted from the MAdCAM-Ig binding
study (Table 1), and
consequently binding of BIO7662 to
4
7 is
likely to have accounted for the reduction in the counts bound for
35S-compound 1.
The RPMI-8866 cell line has been widely used in binding assays to identify
4
7 antagonists
(Carson et al., 1997
;
Shroff et al., 1998
;
Martin et al., 1999
;
Harriman et al., 2000
). We
provide the first evidence that low levels of unactivated
4
1 expressed on RPMI-8866 cells are capable
of binding to a small molecule antagonist, such as 35S-compound 1,
and we demonstrate that unactivated
4
7 on a
variety of cell lines does not bind 35S-compound 1. Low levels of
4
1 expressed on RPMI-8866 cells do not
contribute to binding of MAdCAMIg, and the binding of MAdCAM-1 to cells in
suspension expressing
4
7 is known to
require Mn2+ (Egger et al.,
2002
). Blockade of
4
1 by
BIO7662 abrogated binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866,
K562/
4
7, or HUT-78 cells in
Ca2+/Mg2+, indicating that
4
1 was responsible for binding observed in
the unactivated condition (Fig.
3). Thus, the binding properties of
4 integrins
coexpressed on the same cell varies depending on the state of activation.
Recent reports have described the use of radiolabeled small molecule
ligands that can be used to study
4
1-ligand
interactions (Chen et al.,
1999
,
2001
). For example,
35S-BIO7662 is a specific
4
1
antagonist that binds with high affinity (KD < 10 pM)
to both unactivated and activated
4
1
(Chen et al., 2001
). Solution
binding studies on purified
4
1 identified a
high-affinity site for Ca2+ that stimulates BIO7662 binding and a
low-affinity site that functions independently of BIO7662 binding
(Chen et al., 2001
). Similarly,
[3H]BIO1211 has been identified as a specific
4
1 antagonist that binds with low affinity
(KD of 20-40 nM) to unactivated
4
1 but with high affinity to activated
4
1 (KD of 18-100 pM) to
Chen et al. (1999
). Studies
with antagonists of
4
1 demonstrate that the
metal ion dependence of ligand binding is affected by the affinity of the
ligand for
4
1, because the ED50
concentrations required to support BIO7662 binding were 2-fold lower for
Mn2+, 30-fold lower for Mg2+, and >1000-fold lower
for Ca2+, compared with the concentrations required to support
BIO1211 binding (Chen et al.,
1999
,
2001
).
Compared with association rates reported for BIO7662, BIO1211 and an
LDV-based peptide, the association rate for compound 1 binding to
4
1 in the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+/Mg2+ was greater by an order of magnitude (Chen et
al., 1999
,
2001
;
Chigaev et al., 2001
).
Consistent with published reports on the binding properties of specific
4
1 antagonists, 35S-compound 1
had similar association rates for binding to unactivated and activated
4
1, but dissociation rates were highly
dependent on the state of activation (Fig.
8). 35S-Compound 1 rapidly dissociated from Jurkat
cells expressing unactivated
4
1, but
dissociation from activated
4
1 could not be
observed even after 180 min. Although 35S-compound 1 is a lower
affinity ligand than BIO1211 or BIO7662, this is the first report of a dual
4
1/
4
7
antagonist that can be used to study the metal-cation dependence of both
4
1 and
4
7 binding.
Finally, observations presented here have key implications for the
development of a dual
4
1/
4
7
antagonist that is selective or nonselective for
4
1. Both
4
1 and
4
7 are pharmaceutical targets for a variety
of inflammatory disorders, including asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and
multiple sclerosis (Gordon et al.,
2001
; Jackson,
2002
). The two
4 integrins are unique in their
ability to act both as low-affinity receptors that participate in rolling and
tethering, and as high-affinity receptors that mediate firm adhesion
(Bargatze et al., 1995
;
Berlin et al., 1995
). A
continuum of integrin activation states is known to exist in vivo, and the
Mn2+-activated state may not resemble the highest affinity state
that occurs under physiological conditions. Integrin activation through G
protein-linked receptors occurs within seconds, whereas activation-dependent
arrest takes minutes (Butcher,
1999
). Because the association rate of an antagonist may be slower
than the rate of integrin activation, a nonselective antagonist may be
required for effective blockade of ligand binding, and nonselective
neutralizing antibodies against
4 and
4
7 are known to be efficacious in in vivo
models (Foster, 1996
;
Butcher, 1999
). Both a
selective antagonist that blocks binding to the activated state or a
nonselective antagonist will inhibit the extravasation of lymphocytes to
extracellular sites. Access to integrins after they bind high-affinity
ligands, however, may be limited, or it may be too late to disrupt tight
binding, and a nonselective antagonist might overcome this problem.
State-selective antagonists of
4
1,
however, may have an improved embryonic safety profile. Microinjection of a
nonselective
4
1 blocking antibody or
continuous exposure of rat whole embryo cultures to nonselective antagonists
of
4
1 can induce defects in
chorio-allantoic fusion. Although a selective antagonist of
4
1 was evaluated in this study, the lack of
potency of this compound in 90% serum made it difficult to assess the role of
selective antagonism on development
(Spence et al., 2002
).
Furthermore, although gene knockouts of the
4 subunit or
VCAM-1 have been shown to result in embryo-lethality, this is not the case for
gene knockouts of
7
(Butcher, 1999
). Thus, the use
of small molecule ligands to measure binding parameters of
4
1 and
4
7 in different states of activation will
advance our understanding of how to develop potent, efficacious, and safe
antagonists of
4
1 and
4
7.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
4
7 ligand binding assay. We thank Qian Si
for helpful discussions during the development of an 35S-compound 1
binding assay for
4. We also thank Dr. David Erle
(University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) for providing the
K562/
4
7 cell line. | Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; MAdCAM-1, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; NSB, nonspecific binding; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; CS-1, connecting segment-1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; cmpd, compound.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Linda A. Egger, Merck & Co., Inc., Pharmacology, P.O. Box 2000, RY80N-A26, Rahway, NJ 07065. E-mail: linda_egger{at}merck.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bargatze RF, Jutila MA, and Butcher EC (1995) Distinct
roles of L-selectin and integrins
4
7 and
LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer's patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model
confirmed and refined. Immunity
3: 99-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berlin C, Bargatze RF, Campbell JJ, von Andrian UH, Szabo MC,
Hasslen SR, Nelson RD, Berg EL, Erlandsen SL, and Butcher EC
(1995)
4 integrins mediate lymphocyte
attachment and rolling under physiologic flow. Cell
80:
413-422.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berlin C, Berg EL, Briskin MJ, Andrew DP, Kilshaw PJ, Holzmann B,
Weissman IL, Hamann A, and Butcher EC (1993)
4
7 integrin mediates lymphocyte binding to
the mucosal vascular addressin MAdCAM-1. Cell
74:
185-195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Butcher EC (1999) Lymphocyte homing and intestinal immunity, in Mucosal Immunology, 2nd ed (Ogra PL, Lamm ME, Bienenstock J, Mestecky J, Strober W, and McGhee JR, eds) pp 507-522, Academic Press, San Diego.
Carson KG, Schwender CF, Shroff HN, Cochran NA, Gallant DL, and Briskin MJ (1997) Sulfonopeptide inhibitors of leukocyte adhesion. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 7: 711-714.
Chen LL, Whitty A, Lobb RR, Adams SP, and Pepinsky RB
(1999) Multiple activation states of integrin
4
1 detected through their different
affinities for a small molecule ligand. J Biol Chem
274:
13167-13175.
Chen LL, Whitty A, Scott D, Lee W-C, Cornbese M, Adams SP, Petter
RC, Lobb RR, and Pepinsky RB (2001) Evidence that ligand and
metal ion binding to integrin
4
1 are
regulated through a coupled equilibrium. J Biol Chem
276:
36520-36529.
Chigaev A, Blenc AM, Braaten JV, Kumaraswamy N, Kepley CL, Andrews
RP, Oliver JM, Edwards BS, Prossnitz ER, Larson RS, et al. (2001)
Real time analysis of the affinity regulation of
4 integrin.
The physiologically activated receptor is intermediate in affinity between
resting and Mn2+ or antibody activation. J Biol
Chem 276:
48670-48678.
de Chateau M, Chen S, Salas A, and Springer TA (2001)
Kinetic and mechanical basis of rolling through an integrin and novel
Ca2+-dependent rolling and Mg2+-dependent firm adhesion
modalities for the
4
7-MAdCAM-1 interaction.
Biochemistry 40:
13972-13979.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dransfield I, Cabanas C, Craig A, and Hogg N (1992)
Interaction of leukocyte integrins with ligand is necessary but not sufficient
for function. J Cell Biol
116:
219-226.
Egger LA, Kidambi U, Cao J, Van Riper G, McCauley E, Mumford RA,
Amo S, Lingham R, Lanza T, Lin LS, et al. (2002)
4
7/
4
1
dual integrin antagonists block
4
7-dependent adhesion under shear flow.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
302:
153-162.
Erle DJ, Briskin MJ, Butcher EC, Garcia-Pardo A, Lazarovits AI, and
Tidswell M (1994) Expression and function of the MAdCAM-1
receptor, integrin
4
7, on human leukocytes.
J Immunol 153:
517-528.[Abstract]
Foster CA (1996) VCAM-1/
4 integrin
adhesion pathway: therapeutic target for allergic inflammatory disorders.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
98:
S270-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gordon FH, Lai CWY, Hamilton MI, Allison MC, Srivastava ED,
Fouweather MG, Donoghue S, Greenlees C, Subhani J, Amlot PL, et al.
(2001) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of a humanized
monoclonal antibody to
4 integrin in active Crohn's disease.
Gastroenterology 121:
268-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hagmann WK, Durette PL, Lanza T, Kevin NJ, de Laszlo SE, Kopka IE, Young D, Magriotis PA, Li B, Lin LS, et al. (2001) The discovery of sulfonylated dipeptides as potent VLA-4 antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11: 2709-2713.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harriman GCB, Schwender CF, Gallant D, Cochran NA, and Briskin MJ (2000) Cell adhesion antagonists: synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of phenylalanine based inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 10: 1497-1499.[Medline]
Higgins JMG, Mandlebrot DA, Shaw SK, Russell GJ, Murphy EA, Chen
Y-T, Nelson WJ, Parker CM, and Brenner MB (1998) Direct and
Regulated Interaction of Integrin
E
7 with
E-Cadherin. J Cell Biol
140:
197-210.
Jackson DY (2002)
4 integrin
antagonists. Curr Pharm Des
8:
1229-1253.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jackson DY, Quan C, Artis DR, Rawson T, Blackburn B, Struble M,
Fitzgerald G, Chan K, Mullins S, Burnier JP, et al. (1997) Potent
4
1 peptide antagonists as potential
anti-inflammatory agents. J Med Chem
40:
3359-3368.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kopka IE, Young D, Lin LS, Mumford RA, MacCoss M, Mills SG, Van Riper G, McCauley E, Egger LA, Kidambi U, et al. (2002) Substituted N-(3,5-dichlorobenzenesulfonyl)-L-prolyl-phenylalanine analogues as potent VLA-4 antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12: 637-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
Leitinger B, McDowall A, Stanley P, and Hogg N (2000) The regulation of integrin function by Ca2+. Biochim Biophys Acta 1498: 91-98.[Medline]
Leone DR, Giza K, Gill A, Dolinski BM, Yang W, Perper S, Scott DM,
Lee W-C, Cornebise M, Wortham K, et al. (2003) An assessment of
the mechanistic differences between two integrin
4
1 inhibitors, the mAb TA-2 and the small
molecule BIO5192, in rat EAE. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
305:
1150-1162.
Lin K-C, Ateeq HS, Hsiung SH, Chong LT, Zimmerman CN, Castro A, Lee
WC, Hammond CE, Kalkunte S, Chen LL, et al. (1998) Selective,
tight-binding inhibitors of integrin
4
1
that inhibit allergic airway responses. J Med Chem
42:
920-934.
Lin LS, Lanza TJ, McCauley ED, Van Riper G, Kidambi U, Cao J, Egger
LA, Mumford RA, Schmidt JA, MacCoss M, et al. (2002) Specific and
dual antagonists of
4
1 and
4
7 integrins. Bioorg Med Chem
Lett 12:
133-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin R, Sircar I, Liang JT, Nomura S, Morningstar MM, Gudmundsson
KS, Nowlin DM, Cardarelli PM, Mah JR, Connell SA, et al. (1999)
SAR of TR14035:an orally active dual
4
7/
4
1
integrin antagonist, in Abstracts, 218th National Meeting of the
American Chemical Society, MEDI 60, 1999, August 22: New Orleans,
LA; American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH.
Mould AP, Akiyama SK, and Humphries MJ (1995)
Regulation of integrin
5
1-fibronectin
interactions by divalent cations. Evidence for distinct classes of binding
sites for Mn2+, Mg2+ and Ca2+. J
Biol Chem 270:
26270-26277.
Muller G, Albers M, Fischer R, Hessler G, Lehmann TE, Okigami H,
Tajimi M, Bacon K, and Rolle T (2001) Discovery and evaluation of
piperidinyl carboxylic acid derivatives as potent
4
1 integrin antagonists. Bioorg
Med Chem Lett 11:
3019-3021.[Medline]
Pepinsky RB, Mumford RA, Chen LL, Leone D, Amo SE, Van Riper G,
Whitty A, Dolinski B, Lobb RR, Dean DC, et al. (2002) Comparative
assessment of the ligand and metal Ion binding properties of integrins
9
1 and
4
1. Biochemistry
41:
7125-7141.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shimaoka M, Takagi J, and Springer TA (2002) Conformational regulation of integrin structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys Biomed Struct 31: 485-516.
Shroff HN, Schwender CF, Baxter AD, Brookfield F, Payne LJ, Cochran
NA, Gallant DL, and Briskin MJ (1998) Novel modified tripeptide
inhibitors of
4
7-mediated lymphoid cell
adhesion to MAdCAM-1. Bioorg Med Chem Lett
8:
1601-1606.[Medline]
Sircar I, Gudmundsson KS, and Martin R (1999a)
Inventors, Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd. Assignee. Inhibitors of
4-mediated cell adhesion. US Patent WO 99/36393.
1999 July 22.
Sircar I, Gudmundsson KS, Martin R, Nomura S, Jayakumar H, Nowlin
DM, Caradelli PM, Mah JR, Castro MA, Cao Y, et al. (1999b)
Discovery of TR14035: an orally active dual
4
7/
4
1
integrin antagonist, in Abstracts, 218th National Meeting of the
American Chemical Society, MEDI 59, 1999 August 22: New Orleans,
LA; American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH.
Spence S, Vetter C, Hagmann WK, Van Riper G, Williams H, Mumford RA, Lanza TJ, Lin LS, and Schmidt JA (2002) Effects of VLA-4 antagonists in rat whole embryo culture. Teratology 65: 26-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vanderslice P, Ren K, Revelle JK, Kim DC, Scott D, Bjercke RJ, Yeh
ETH, Beck PJ, and Kogan TP (1997) A cyclic hexapeptide is a
potent antagonist of
4 integrins. J
Immunol 158:
1710-1718.[Abstract]
Viney JL, Jones S, Chiu HH, Lagrimas B, Renz ME, Presta LG, Jackson D, Hillan KJ, Lew S, and Fong S (1996) Mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1: a structural and functional analysis demarcates the integrin binding motif. J Immunol 157: 2488-2497.[Abstract]
Wang J-H, Pepinsky B, Stehle T, Liu J-H, Karpusas M, Browning B,
and Osborn L (1995) The crystal structure of an N-terminal
two-domain fragment of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1): a cyclic
peptide based on the domain 1 C-D loop can inhibit VCAM-1-
4
integrin interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
5714-5718.
Wayner EA and Kovach NL (1992) Activation-dependent
recognition by hematopoietic cells of the LDV sequence in the V region of
fibronectin. J Cell Biol
116:
489-497.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||