JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on May 23, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.047704


0022-3565/03/3063-903-913$20.00
JPET 306:903-913, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.102.047704v1
306/3/903    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detmers, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detmers, P. A.

INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY

A Small Molecule {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 Antagonist Differentiates between the Low-Affinity States of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7: Characterization of Divalent Cation Dependence

Linda A. Egger, Jin Cao, Christine McCallum, Usha Kidambi, Gail Van Riper, Ermengilda McCauley, Richard A. Mumford, Thomas J. Lanza, Linus S. Lin, Stephen E. de Laszlo, David N. Young, Ginger Yang, Dennis C. Dean, Conrad E. Raab, Mike A. Wallace, Allen N. Jones, William K. Hagmann, John A. Schmidt, R. Blake Pepinsky, Daniel M. Scott, Wen-Cherng Lee, Mark A. Cornebise, and Patricia A. Detmers

Pharmacology (L.A.E., J.C., U.K., P.A.D.), High Throughput Screening (C.M.), Immunology and Rheumatology (G.V.R., E.M., R.A.M.), Medicinal Chemistry (L.S.L., S.E.d.L., D.N.Y., G.Y., W.K.H.), Drug Metabolism (D.C.D., C.E.R., M.A.W., A.N.J.), Merck & Co., Rahway, New Jersey; Aventis (J.A.S.), Bridgewater, New Jersey; and Biogen, Inc. (R.B.P., D.M.S., W.-C.L., M.A.C.), Cambridge, Massachusetts

Received December 4, 2002; accepted May 22, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
An {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 dual antagonist, 35S-compound 1, was used as a model ligand to study the effect of divalent cations on the activation state and ligand binding properties of {alpha}4 integrins. In the presence of 1 mM each Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound to several cell lines expressing both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7, but 2S-[(1-benzenesulfonyl-pyrrolidine-2S-carbonyl)-amino]-4-[4-methyl-2S-(methyl-{2-[4-(3-o-tolyl-ureido)-phenyl]-acetyl}-amino) pentanoylamino]-butyric acid (BIO7662), a specific {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonist, completely inhibited 35S-compound 1 binding, suggesting that {alpha}4{beta}1 was responsible for the observed binding. 35S-Compound 1 bound RPMI-8866 cells expressing predominantly {alpha}4{beta}7 with a KD of 1.9 nM in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+, and binding was inhibited only 29% by BIO7662, suggesting that the probe is a potent antagonist of activated {alpha}4{beta}7. With Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound Jurkat cells expressing primarily {alpha}4{beta}1 with a KD of 18 nM. In contrast, the binding of 35S-compound 1 to Mn2+-activated Jurkat cells occurred slowly, reaching equilibrium by 60 min, and failed to dissociate within another 60 min. The ability of four {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonists to block binding of activated {alpha}4{beta}1 or {alpha}4{beta}7 to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 or mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1, respectively, or to 35S-compound 1 was measured, and a similar rank order of potency was observed for native ligand and probe. Inhibition of 35S-compound 1 binding to {alpha}4{beta}1 in Ca2+/Mg2+ was used to identify nonselective antagonists among these four. These studies demonstrate that {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 have distinct binding properties for the same ligand, and binding parameters are dependent on the state of integrin activation in response to different divalent cations.


Lymphocyte recruitment in the vasculature is regulated by the differential expression and activation of homing receptors (selectins and integrins) on lymphocytes that interact with counter-receptors of the Ig superfamily on endothelial cells. This interaction mediates a multistep process, involving rolling and tethering of leukocytes to endothelial ligands, rapid activation of integrins by locally released chemokines, stable adhesion of activated integrins to endothelial ligands, and transendothelial migration through the vessel wall (Bargatze et al., 1995Go). Although all integrins expressed on leukocytes can mediate firm adhesion during normal lymphocyte trafficking and in response to inflammatory stimuli, {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 are members of a small subset of integrins that can also mediate rolling (Bargatze et al., 1995Go; Berlin et al., 1995Go). In vivo studies with monoclonal antibodies or inhibitory peptides demonstrate the pathophysiological role of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 in leukocyte-mediated inflammation in animal models (Foster, 1996Go; Butcher, 1999Go), and clinical trials with Antegren (anti-{alpha}4, Elan/Biogen) resulted in remission for Crohn's disease patients (Gordon et al., 2001Go).

{alpha}4 integrins are constitutively expressed on a variety of leukocytes and can bind to shared or distinct binding partners. {alpha}4{beta}1 is expressed on lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes and mediates adhesion to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expressed on the endothelium and to the connecting segment-1 (CS-1) subdomain of human fibronectin in the extracellular matrix. {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 are coexpressed on peripheral blood leukocytes, and {alpha}4{beta}7 is highly expressed on a discrete subpopulation of gut-homing memory T and B lymphocytes, mediating lymphocyte adhesion within the vasculature of the gastrointestinal tract, where its major ligand, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), is preferentially expressed on high endothelial venules (Butcher, 1999Go). Although both {alpha}4{beta}7 and {alpha}4{beta}1 can bind VCAM-1 and CS-1, {alpha}4{beta}1 does not bind MAdCAM-1, and {alpha}4{beta}7 binds to MAdCAM-1 with higher affinity than to VCAM-1 or to CS-1 (Berlin et al., 1993Go).

Key motifs for the binding of {alpha}4{beta}7 and {alpha}4{beta}1 to native ligands have been defined as leucine-aspartic acid-threonine in MAdCAM-1 (Viney et al., 1996Go), isoleucine-aspartic acid-serine in VCAM-1 (Wang et al., 1995Go), and leucin-aspartic acid-valine in CS-1 (Wayner and Kovach, 1992Go). Small molecule antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}7 that mimic the LDT motif have been described that block the binding of {alpha}4{beta}7-expressing cells to MAdCAM-Ig in the presence of Mn2+ (Carson et al., 1997Go; Shroff et al., 1998Go; Martin et al., 1999Go; Harriman et al., 2000Go; Egger et al., 2002Go). Similarly, antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1 have been reported to block binding of Mn2+-activated (Jackson et al., 1997Go; Vanderslice et al., 1997Go; Lin et al., 1998Go; Hagmann et al., 2001Go; Muller et al., 2001Go) and unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go) to ligand in vitro.

The essential role of cation-binding sites in regulating integrin function is known, but the coordination of each cation-binding site and the individual role of different metal cations is not well understood (Leitinger et al., 2000Go). All integrin {alpha}-subunits have seven homologous 60-amino acid repeats at the N terminus that have been predicted to fold into a {beta}-propeller structure (Shimaoka et al., 2002Go), and three to four putative Ca2+ binding sites are located within repeats 4 through 7. A metal ion-dependent activation site motif is a unique Mg2+/Mn2+ binding site located in the I-domain of the {alpha}-subunit, and divalent cation bound at this site has a structural role in coordinating the binding of ligand to the I-domain containing integrins. Although {alpha}4 does not contain an I-domain, an I-like domain that contains a metal ion-dependent activation site-like motif is present in the {beta}-chain of all integrins. Although the effect of divalent cations on {alpha}4{beta}7-ligand interactions has not been extensively characterized, recent studies have shown that Ca2+ is essential to support rolling under shear flow, whereas Mg2+ can promote firm adhesion of cells expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 to MAdCAM-1 (de Chateau et al., 2001Go).

To assess the effect of divalent cations on the activation state of {alpha}4 integrins expressed on human lymphocytes, we used a novel dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonist, 35S-compound 1 (Fig. 1), as a model ligand. A similar approach has been used to study multiple activation states of {alpha}4{beta}1 through their different affinities for a small molecule ligand (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go), but the binding of a small molecule ligand to different activation states of {alpha}4b7 has not been described. These studies provide new information that {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 have distinct binding affinities for the same small molecule ligand, and binding is dependent on the state of integrin activation in response to different divalent cations.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Structure of antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 integrins. The structures of compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 (Hagmann et al., 2001Go; Kopka et al., 2002Go; Lin et al., 2002Go), TR14035 (Sircar et al., 1999aGo), and BIO7662 (Chen et al., 2001Go) are shown. Chemical names are given in "Compounds".

 


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Compounds. Compound 1, N-[N-benzenesulfonyl-4(R)-cyclopropylamino-2(S)-prolyl]-(L)-4-(2',6'-bismethoxyphenyl)phenylalanine; compound 2, N-{[N-(3,5-dichlorobenzenesulfonyl)]-2(S)-methylprolyl}(L)-4-(2',6'-bismethoxyphenyl)phenylalanine; compound 3, N-{[N-(3,5-dichlorobenzenesulfonyl)]-2(S)-methylprolyl}-(L)-4-(2',6'-bishydroxyphenyl)phenylalanine; and compound 4, N-{[N-(3,5-dichlorobenzenesulfonyl)]-2(R)-methylprolyl}-(D)-phenylalanine, were synthesized as described previously (Hagmann et al., 2001Go; Kopka et al., 2002Go; Lin et al., 2002Go) or by using similar methods. TR14035, N-(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)-(L)-4-(2',6'-bis-methoxyphenyl) phenylalanine, was synthesized as described previously (Sircar et al., 1999aGo). BIO7662, 2S-[(1-benzenesulfonyl-pyrrolidine-2S-carbonyl)-amino]-4-[4-methyl-2S-(methyl-{2-[4-(3-o-tolyl-ureido)-phenyl]-acetyl}-amino) pentanoylamino]-butyric acid, was synthesized as described previously (Chen et al., 2001Go). The structures of all compounds are shown in Fig. 1. 35S-Compound 1 was synthesized by reacting [35S]PhSO2Cl with an appropriately diprotected amine precursor in dichloromethane in the presence of ditertbutylmethylpyridine. After sequential deprotection of the resulting [35S]sulfonamide intermediate, crude 35S-compound 1 was purified by semipreparative HPLC and formulated as a solution in methanol with a concentration of 1.14 mCi/ml. The radiochemical purity of the compound was >95% as measured by reverse phase HPLC, and the specific activity was measured to be 722 Ci/mmol by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The radioligand in MeOH was aliquoted and stored at -20°C. The binding affinity for the radiolabeled compound was indistinguishable from that of the unlabeled compound as measured by the ability of compound to block the binding of native ligands to cells expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 and {alpha}4{beta}1.

Antibodies and Cell Lines. The following purified monoclonal antibodies were obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA): 4B4 (mouse anti-human {beta}1), FIB27 (rat anti-mouse {beta}7 that cross-reacts with human {beta}7), and isotype controls (mouse IgG1, rat IgG2b). HP2/1 (mouse anti-human {alpha}4) was obtained from Coulter/Immunotech (Hialeah, FL). The following cell lines were used: RPMI-8866 cells (human B cell line) obtained from John A. Wilkins (University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada); Jurkat and HUT-78 (human T cell lines) from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA); and K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells, a stably transfected human erythroleukemia cell-line obtained from David J. Erle (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA).

Binding of Native Ligands to Cells Expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 and {alpha}4{beta}1. A ligand binding assay for Mn2+-activated {alpha}4{beta}7 has been described previously (Egger et al., 2002Go) and was performed by incubating RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x 105 cells/well) with <200 pM iodinated human MAdCAM-Ig. Similarly, a ligand binding assay for activated {alpha}4{beta}1 was performed by incubating Jurkat cells (5 x 105 cells/well) expressing {alpha}4{beta}1 with <100 pM iodinated VCAM-Ig in the presence of Mn2+, as described previously (Hagmann et al., 2001Go). Purified VCAM-Ig and MAdCAM-Ig were labeled with 125I using Bolton Hunter reagent and purified using HPLC gel filtration chromatography, and specific radioactivities were in excess of 1,100 Ci/mmol. Compounds were evaluated by incubating radioligand, compound (prepared in DMSO; <1% DMSO final concentration), cells, and binding buffer (25 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 2 mM glucose, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4) containing 1 mM MnCl2 at 25°C for 30 min ({alpha}4{beta}1 assays) or 45 min ({alpha}4{beta}7 assays) in a 96-well Millipore (Bedford, MA) multiscreen MHVBN filtration plate. After filtration and a single wash with binding buffer, the filtration plates were dried and transferred to adaptor plates. After adding 100 µl of Microscint-20 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) to each well, the plates were sealed, placed on a shaker for 1 min, and counted on a PerkinElmer Top-Count. Wells containing cells + radioligand + 1 µM compound or DMSO alone served as controls to calculate 100 and 0% inhibition, respectively.

Binding of a Dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 Antagonist Probe, 35S-Compound 1, to Cells Expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 or {alpha}4{beta}1. Equilibrium binding studies were performed by incubating either RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 or Jurkat cells (5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing {alpha}4{beta}1 in binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM each CaCl2 and MgCl2 with 0 to 30 nM (for {alpha}4{beta}7 studies) or 0 to 60 nM (for {alpha}4{beta}1 studies) 35S-compound 1 in siliconized Eppendorf microfuge tubes for 1 h at 4°C. All 35S-compound 1 binding studies with RPMI-8866 cells were conducted in the presence or absence of a specific {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonist, 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et al., 2001Go), to selectively block {alpha}4{beta}1. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000g for 3 min, washed twice with binding buffer at 4°C, transferred to a scintillation vial containing 5 ml of CytoScint (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA), and cell-associated 35S-compound 1 was measured by scintillation counting. Tubes containing cells + radioligand + 1 µM compound 1 or DMSO alone served as controls to calculate 100 and 0% inhibition, respectively. Data were analyzed by nonlinear regression to calculate Bmax and KD values.

Kinetic analysis of 35S-compound 1 binding to cells expressing {alpha}4 was performed by incubating RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 or Jurkat cells (5 x 105 cells/tube) expressing {alpha}4{beta}1 in binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 with 6.5 nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 in siliconized Eppendorf microfuge tubes for 2 to 120 min at 4°C. RPMI-8866 cells were pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et al., 2001Go) as described above. Binding was terminated by adding 5 µM compound 1 at each time point. Cells were immediately transferred to an ice-bath for 10 min, pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000g for 3 min, and cell associated 35S-compound 1 was determined by scintillation counting as described above.

When the rate of 35S-compound 1 dissociation was evaluated, reaction mixtures were incubated with 6.5 nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 for 1 h at 4°C, followed by the addition of 5 µM compound 1 for another 2 to 120 min. At each time point, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with 4°C binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM each CaCl2 and MgCl2, and counted for cell-associated 35S-compound 1 as described above. On rates (kon), off rates (koff), and KD values for the binding of 35S-compound 1 were determined from kinetic measurements. Prism 3.0 software was used to calculate kobs (min-1) and koff (min-1) values from the on and off rate binding curves, respectively: kon (min-1 nM-1) = (kobs - koff)/[ligand], and KD (M) = koff/kon.

A 35S-compound 1 binding assay for activated or unactivated {alpha}4 was performed by incubating either RPMI-8866 cells (7.5 x 105 cells/well), K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells (1 x 105 cells/well), HUT-78 cells (5 x 105 cells/well), or Jurkat cells (5 x 105 cells/well) in binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 with less than 150 pM 35S-compound 1 for {alpha}4{beta}7 or {alpha}4{beta}1 studies. RPMI-8866 cells were pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 (Chen et al., 2001Go) as described above. Test compounds were evaluated by incubating radioligand, compound, cells, and binding buffer at 25°C for 45 min in a 96-well multiscreen filtration plate on a shaking platform. After filtration and a single wash with binding buffer containing either 1 mM MnCl2 or 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2, the plates were processed and counted as described above for the binding of native ligand to cells expressing {alpha}4. Nonspecific binding (NSB) was determined by the addition of 1 µM compound 1.

Quantitative FACS Analysis. A total of 106 RPMI-8866 or Jurkat cells were incubated for 30 min on ice in FACS buffer (phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM each CaCl2 and MgCl2, 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml goat IgG, and 0.05% sodium azide) containing saturating levels of the following phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies: FIB504 rat anti-mouse {beta}7 (2.4 µg/ml; cross-reacts with human {beta}7), MAR4 mouse anti-human {beta}1 (80 µg/ml), 9F10 mouse anti-human {alpha}4 (10 µg/ml), mIgG1 isotype, and rIgG2a isotype controls. All phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies were obtained from BD PharMingen. Cells were washed in FACS buffer and resuspended in FACS buffer containing 1 µg/ml propidium iodide. Cells were analyzed by a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Standardized quantum R-phycoerythrin microbeads (Flow Cytometry Standards Corp., Fishers, IN) were analyzed by flow cytometry and used to create a calibration curve that relates mean fluorescence intensities to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorescence for use in calculating receptor density values.

Statistical Analysis. Curve fits and statistics were performed using KaleidaGraph (Synergy, Reading, PA) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) with a one-way analysis of variance (nonparametric test) followed by a Tukey's post test if overall P < 0.05, and a paired t test was used when comparing only two sets of data. Data were analyzed by nonlinear regression with an equation for one-site binding to calculate Bmax and KD values. Nonlinear regression analysis was used with equations for one-phase exponential association with no weighting or one-phase exponential decay with no weighting to obtain curve fits for association and dissociation plots, respectively. R2 values were used as an indication of the goodness of fit, and both single- and double-phase exponential equations were compared to obtain the best fit. Double reciprocal plots were analyzed by linear regression analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Potency of Compound 1 in {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 Ligand Binding Assays. Compound 1 (Fig. 1) represents one of a structural class of potent {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonists (Hagmann et al., 2001Go). To determine whether compound 1 could also block ligand binding to {alpha}4{beta}7, the ability of this compound to inhibit binding of 125I-hMAdCAM-Ig to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of the divalent cation Mn2+ was evaluated using methods described previously (Egger et al., 2002Go). RPMI-8866 cells, a human B cell line, were chosen for the assay, because they express high levels of {alpha}4{beta}7 (~60,000 {alpha}4{beta}7 receptors/cell), but low levels of {alpha}4{beta}1 (~4,000 {alpha}4{beta}1 receptors/cell), as demonstrated by quantitative flow cytometry (Fig. 2A). In addition, the specificity of MAdCAM-Ig binding to {alpha}4{beta}7 on the RPMI-8866 cells has been confirmed by demonstrating that anti-{alpha}4 and anti-{beta}7 mAbs block binding, whereas an anti-{beta}1 mAb does not block binding (Egger et al., 2002Go). Furthermore, the low levels of {alpha}4{beta}1 expressed on the RPMI-8866 cell line do not bind VCAM-Ig in the presence of anti-{beta}7 mAbs and1mMMn2+ or1mMCa2+/Mg2+ (data not shown). Thus, RPMI-8866 cells can be used to evaluate the potency of compounds in blocking binding of {alpha}4{beta}7, but not {alpha}4{beta}1, to MAdCAM-Ig. Compound 1 inhibited the binding of MAdCAM-Ig to {alpha}4{beta}7 with an IC50 of 1.1 nM (Table 1).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Surface expression of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 on RPMI-8866 and Jurkat cell lines. Quantitative FACS analysis was used to determine the density of antibody binding sites for {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 expressed on the surface of the RPMI-8866 human B cell line (A) and the Jurkat human T cell line (B) as described under Materials and Methods. The data represent the mean number of receptors expressed per cell (rec/cell) for at least two independent experiments for each cell type. The isotype control, anti-{alpha}4, anti-{beta}1, and anti-{beta}7 mAb-treated cell profiles are represented by the gray, black, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Activity of antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 in ligand binding assays Compounds were tested using a 10-point titration in assays that measure the binding of either 125I-MAdCAM-Ig, 125I-VCAM-Ig, or 35S-compound 1 to cells expressing {alpha}4 to determine compound potency and specificity. Assays for activated {alpha}4{beta}7 measured the binding of either 125I-MAdCAM-Ig to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ or the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662. Similarly, assays for activated {alpha}4{beta}1 measured the binding of either 125I-VCAM-Ig or 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+, whereas an unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 assay measured the binding of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+. Values represent the average of at least two independent experiments, and all values were within 95% confidence limits.

 

To compare the potency of compound 1 for blockade of {alpha}4{beta}1 under similar conditions, the ability of the compound to inhibit 125I-hVCAM-Ig binding to Jurkat cells expressing {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of the divalent cation Mn2+ was performed as described previously (Egger et al., 2002Go). For this assay, Jurkat cells, a human T cell line, were chosen, because they express high levels of {alpha}4{beta}1 (~90,000 {alpha}4{beta}1 receptors/cell), but low levels of {alpha}4{beta}7 (~7,000 {alpha}4{beta}7 receptors/cell) (Fig. 2B). Specificity of VCAM-Ig binding to {alpha}4{beta}1 on Jurkat cells, was confirmed previously using anti-{alpha}4 and anti-{beta}1 mAbs to completely abrogate binding, in the absence of inhibition by anti-{beta}7 mAb (Egger et al., 2002Go). The low level of {alpha}4{beta}7 expressed on the Jurkat cell line does not bind MAdCAM-Ig in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ or 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (data not shown), indicating that Jurkat cells can be used to evaluate the potency of compounds in blocking binding of {alpha}4{beta}1, but not {alpha}4{beta}7, to VCAM-Ig. Compound 1 inhibited the binding of VCAM-Ig to {alpha}4{beta}1 with an IC50 of 0.10 nM (Table 1). Thus, compound 1 is a potent dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonist.

Divalent Cation-Dependent Binding of a Radiolabeled {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 Antagonist Probe, 35S-compound 1, to RPMI-8866 Cells, K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 Cells, and HUT-78 Cells. {alpha}4-ligand interactions are dependent on divalent cations, which modulate the affinity state of the integrins for their ligands (Leitinger et al., 2000Go). To test the divalent cation dependence of binding, an assay was developed to measure the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells expressing activated or unactivated {alpha}4{beta}7 in the presence of the divalent cations Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+, respectively (Fig. 3). In the presence of 1 mM Mn2+, RPMI-8866 cells bound 35S-compound 1 with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 12 (Fig. 3A). In the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound RPMI-8866 cells with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 6. Specific binding was not observed in the presence of either 1 mM Ca2+ or 1 mM Mg2+ alone (data not shown). The inclusion of 10 mM EDTA in the binding reaction abrogated specific binding, as expected.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of divalent cations on the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells. A, binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells was measured by pretreating cells with binding buffer containing one of the following: 1 mM Mn2+, 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+, 1 mM Mn2+ plus 10 mM EDTA, or 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+ plus 10 mM EDTA, or the corresponding binding buffer containing 100 nM BIO7662. Total binding was measured as described under Materials and Methods in the absence ({blacksquare}) or presence ({square}) of BIO7662, and addition of 1 µM unlabeled compound 1 was used to define NSB for cells treated with binding buffer alone () or binding buffer containing BIO7662 (). B and C, binding of 35S-compound 1 to K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells (B) or HUT-78 cells (C) was measured by pretreating cells with binding buffer containing either 1 mM Mn2+ or 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+ in the absence ({blacksquare}) or presence ({square}) of 100 nM BIO7662. Total binding was determined as described above, and treatment with 1 µM unlabeled compound 1 was used to define NSB for cells treated with binding buffer alone () or binding buffer containing BIO7662 (). Statistics were generated with Prism by using a one-way analysis of variance (nonparametric test) with a Tukey's post test, and *, P < 0.001 when comparing total binding for each condition with the matched nonspecific binding control. The data represent the mean ± S.E.M. calculated from a total of four replicates from at least two independent experiments.

 

To determine whether the low level of {alpha}4{beta}1 present on RPMI-8866 cells (Fig. 2A) contributed to the observed binding of 35S-compound 1, binding was measured with or without 100 nM BIO7662 added to specifically block {alpha}4{beta}1 (Fig. 3A). BIO7662, a highly selective inhibitor of {alpha}4{beta}1 (Chen et al., 2001Go; Pepinsky et al., 2002Go; Leone et al., 2003Go), was used for these studies because none of the available anti-{alpha}4 or anti-{beta}1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies blocked the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}1 even at concentrations up to 3.3 µg/ml (data not shown). BIO7662 (100 nM) was selected to completely saturate {alpha}4{beta}1 (IC50 of 0.03 nM in the {alpha}4{beta}1/125IVCAM-Ig binding assay; Table 1) without interfering with {alpha}4{beta}7 (IC50 of 3.34 µM in the {alpha}4{beta}7/125I-MAdCAM-Ig binding assay; Table 1). In the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, RPMI-8866 cells bound 35S-compound 1 (input counts <=150 pM) with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 8 (Fig. 3A), and binding was reduced by 29% compared with cells not treated with BIO7662, indicating that, as expected, most of the total counts bound are due to binding to {alpha}4{beta}7. Total binding in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and BIO7662 was not significantly different from background binding, suggesting that low levels of unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 expressed on RPMI-8866 cells are responsible for the binding of 35S-compound 1 under these conditions. Comparison of the specific binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells measured in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ with or without BIO7662 was significantly different with a P value < 0.01. Furthermore, when incubating RPMI-8866 cells with 0 to 30 nM 35S-compound 1 in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, no significant binding above background was observed (data not shown). The results shown in Fig. 3A indicate that {alpha}4{beta}7 on RPMI-8866 cells requires Mn2+ to support binding of 35S-compound 1 and that the unactivated state of the receptor does not support binding.

To determine whether the inability of 35S-compound 1 to bind unactivated {alpha}4{beta}7 was dependent on cell type, we measured binding to K562 cells stably transfected with {alpha}4{beta}7 (K562/{alpha}4{beta}7) in the presence of different divalent cations. As demonstrated by quantitative FACS analysis, K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells express ~200,000 copies/cell of {alpha}4{beta}1 and ~200,000 copies/cell of {alpha}4{beta}7 (data not shown). In the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells bound 35S-compound 1 with a 19-fold ratio of specific to nonspecific binding, and binding was reduced by 63% compared with cells not treated with BIO7662 (Fig. 3B). Thus, the binding of 35S-compound 1 to activated K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells is mediated by both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7, with each integrin having a similar contribution to the total binding. In the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cells with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 31-fold (Fig. 3B), but pretreating the cells with 100 nM BIO7662 abrogated binding (Fig. 3B), indicating that K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cell binding to 35S-compound 1 is mediated solely by unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1. To extend the above-mentioned findings to another cell line, the effect of divalent cations on the binding of 35S-compound to HUT-78 cells was evaluated. By FACS analysis, HUT-78 cells express equal proportions of both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 (data not shown), and the relative receptor density of {alpha}4{beta}7 was similar to levels observed on RPMI-8866 cells (Erle et al., 1994Go). Mn2+-activated HUT-78 cells bound to 35S-compound 1 with a 10- or 2-fold ratio of specific to nonspecific binding in the absence or presence of 100 nM BIO7662, respectively (Fig. 3C). In the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+, 35S-compound 1 bound unactivated HUT-78 cells with a ratio of specific to nonspecific binding of 9-fold, but failed to bind unactivated cells after pretreatment with 100 nM BIO7662 (Fig. 3C), indicating that unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 is also completely responsible for HUT-78 cell binding to 35S-compound 1. Thus, the binding properties of 35S-compound 1 for different activation states of {alpha}4 are not dependent on cell type or expression levels of {alpha}4{beta}1 relative to {alpha}4{beta}7, but rather are dependent on the activation state of the integrins.

Binding Kinetics of 35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866 Cells. After three cell lines expressing both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 were evaluated, subsequent studies on {alpha}4{beta}7 focused on characterizing the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells that predominantly express {alpha}4{beta}7. To determine whether an assay could be developed to study both the association and dissociation of unlabeled compounds from binding to activated {alpha}4{beta}7, equilibrium and kinetic studies for the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}7 were performed in the presence of Mn2+ with cells pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 (Fig. 4). Binding of 35S-compound 1 was dose-dependent and saturable with maximal binding to {alpha}4{beta}7 observed at approximately 10 nM. Assuming that each receptor bound one ligand, specific counts bound at saturation provided a direct measure of {alpha}4{beta}7 expression levels. Based on the calculation of Bmax values, the RPMI-8866 cells used in these studies had approximately 43,000 copies of {alpha}4{beta}7/cell, which is in good agreement with the receptor density determined by quantitative FACS analysis (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Equilibrium binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of Mn2+. RPMI-8866 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of 35S-compound 1 (0-30 nM) in binding buffer containing 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662. Specific binding (cpm) was measured as described under Materials and Methods, and nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled compound 1. Bmax values (receptors/cell) were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis by using a one-site binding model (R2 value of 0.98). The data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments containing duplicate samples in each experiment.

 

The quadratic shape of the binding curve in Fig. 4 suggested that the apparent KD for binding was small compared with the concentration of {alpha}4{beta}7 (360 pM) present in the binding assay, which is consistent with reports that measure binding of small molecule antagonists to {alpha}4{beta}1 (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go). Based on this observation, it was evident that the saturation binding curves measured titration of the receptor to full occupancy, and a kinetic assessment of affinity was used to measure actual affinity constants. In the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662, binding occurred rapidly with a kon of 0.05 nM-1 min-1, reached equilibrium within 10 min, and reversed with a koff of 0.09 min-1 (Fig. 5). Thus, a KD value of 1.9 nM was calculated based on the binding kinetics of compound 1 to activated {alpha}4{beta}7.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. On and off rates for 35S-compound 1 binding to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of Mn2+. RPMI-8866 cells were incubated for the indicated times with 6.5 nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 in binding buffer containing 1 mM Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662. Specific binding (cpm) for compound association ({blacksquare}) or dissociation ({blacktriangleup}) was measured as described under Materials and Methods, with nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled compound 1. kobs was determined at a ligand concentration of 11.5 nM by fitting the data to a one-phase exponential association equation (R2 value of 0.92). The indicated on rate (kon), off rate (koff) and KD value for the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}7 on RPMI-8866 cells were determined from the kinetic measurements by fitting the data to a one-phase exponential association or decay equation (R2 value of 0.99 for each curve). The data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments containing duplicate samples in each experiment.

 

Effect of Divalent Cation Concentration on the Binding of 35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866 Cells. To elucidate the role of divalent cations on integrin activation, the effects of metal ion concentration on the binding of the 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells were examined. Cells were pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 to block {alpha}4{beta}1, and binding was measured as a function of changing Mn2+ or Mg2+ concentrations from 0.03 to 100 mM (Fig. 6A). Mn2+ enhanced the binding of the 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells with an EC50 of 0.5 mM, whereas Mg2+ only enhanced binding at higher concentrations (3-fold increase in specific binding at 5 mM; Fig. 6A).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells under different divalent cation conditions. For all experiments, RPMI-8866 cells were pretreated with 100 nM BIO7662 and incubated at room temperature for 45 min with 110 pM of 35S-compound 1. A, cells were incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations of Mn2+ ({bullet}) or Mg2+ ({square}). Specific binding (cpm) was measured as described under Materials and Methods, and nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled compound 1. B, cells were incubated in the presence of 5 mM Mn2+ ({square}) or 5 mM Mg2+ ({bullet}) and increasing concentrations of Ca2+, and specific counts bound were determined as described above. C, cells were incubated in the presence of 0.2 mM Mn2+ (), 1 mM Mn2+ ({bullet}), or 5 mM Mn2+ ({boxplus}) and increasing concentrations of Ca2+. D, a double reciprocal plot of the data shown in C. By linear regression analysis, the three lines intersect approximately on the x-axis, indicative of noncompetitive inhibition. R2 values are 0.97 (5 mM Mn2+ with Ca2+), 0.99 (1 mM Mn2+ with Ca2+) and 0.99 (0.2 mM Mn2+ with Ca2+). All data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments containing duplicate samples in each experiment.

 

To determine whether Ca2+ can affect the ability of Mg2+ or Mn2+ to activate {alpha}4{beta}7, RPMI-8866 cells were treated with 100 nM BIO7662 and increasing concentrations of Ca2+ (0.04-5 mM) in combination with 5 mM Mn2+ or5mMMg2+, to achieve maximal activation and partial activation, respectively. In the presence of 5 mM Mn2+, Ca2+ at 1.25 mM and 5 mM inhibited the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells by 35 and 65%, respectively (Fig. 6B). Similarly, when combined with 5 mM Mg2+,Ca2+ at 1.25 and 5 mM inhibited the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells by 38 and 51%, respectively.

To further explore the interaction between Mn2+ and Ca2+, the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}7 was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of Ca2+ (0.1-100 mM) in combination with three different fixed concentrations of Mn2+ (0.2, 1, and 5 mM). Ca2+ inhibited the binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells with IC50 values of 1.0, 4.0, and 14.0 mM, respectively. A double reciprocal plot of these data (Fig. 6D) indicated that the inhibition observed by Ca2+ in the presence of Mn2+ is noncompetitive in nature, and this lack of competition is between Ca2+ and Mn2+ rather than ligand.

Divalent Cation-Dependent Binding 35S-Compound 1 to Jurkat Cells. To understand how divalent cations regulate the activation state of {alpha}4{beta}1, an assay was developed to measure the binding of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells expressing activated or unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of the divalent cations Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+, respectively (Fig. 7). Binding of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells was dose-dependent and reached saturation at 5 nM. Because available anti-{alpha}4{beta}1 mAb did not compete with the binding of 35S-compound 1, the specificity of 35S-compound 1 binding to {alpha}4{beta}1 was determined by direct competition with unlabeled compound 1 at 1 µM. Specific counts bound at saturation provided a direct measure of {alpha}4{beta}1 expression levels, and, based on this value, Jurkat cells used in these studies have approximately 64,000 copies (in Mn2+) and 57,000 copies (in Ca2+/Mg2+) of {alpha}4{beta}1/cell, which is in agreement with the receptor density determined by quantitative FACS analysis (Fig. 2B). Binding was dependent on the presence of divalent cations, and was blocked in the presence of 10 mM EDTA (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Equilibrium binding of 35S-compound 1 to Jurkat cells expressing {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+. Jurkat cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of 35S-compound 1 (0-54 nM) in binding buffer containing 1 mM Mn2+ (A) or 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (B) and 100 nM BIO7662. Specific binding (cpm) was measured as described under Materials and Methods, with nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled compound 1. Bmax values (receptors/cell) were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis by fitting the data to a one-site binding model (R2 value of 0.95 or 0.97 for A and B, respectively). The data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments.

 

As observed for the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}7, the apparent KD for binding seemed to be small compared with the concentration of {alpha}4{beta}1 (350 and 320 pM, respectively) present in the binding assay (Fig. 7). The kinetic assessment of binding of compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of 1 mM Mn2+ indicated that binding occurred very slowly, reaching equilibrium by 60 min, and dissociation was not observed after another 60 min of incubation (Fig. 8A), or even after another 180 min (48,036 specific cpm bound after 240 min of total incubation time; data not shown). In the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+, binding occurred with a kon of 0.01 nM-1 min-1, reaching equilibrium within 10 min, and dissociation was rapid, with a koff of 0.24 min-1, resulting in a KD of 18 nM (Fig. 8B). Because the saturation binding curves measured titration of the receptor to full occupancy, the KD values obtained from the kinetic binding curves represent the actual binding affinity. Although binding of the protein ligand 125I-VCAM-Ig requires an activated state of {alpha}4{beta}1, achieved by adding 1 mM Mn2+, 35S-compound 1 is observed to bind both activated and unactivated states of {alpha}4{beta}1. Although similar association rates were observed for the binding of 35S-compound 1 to unactivated and activated {alpha}4{beta}1, dissociation rates were dependent on the activation state of the integrin, with dissociation from the activated receptor indiscernible under the conditions of the assay.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. On and off rates for 35S-compound 1 binding to Jurkat cells in the presence of Mn2+ or Ca2+/Mg2+. A, Jurkat cells were incubated for the indicated times with 6.5 nM 35S-compound 1 and 5 nM unlabeled compound 1 in binding buffer containing 1 mM Mn2+ or 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+. A, specific binding (cpm) for compound association ({blacksquare}) to or dissociation ({blacktriangleup}) from Mn2+-activated {alpha}4{beta}1 was measured as described under Materials and Methods. B, specific binding (cpm) for compound association ({square})toor dissociation ({triangleup}) from unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 was measured as outlined above and as described under Materials and Methods. kobs was determined at a ligand concentration of 11.5 nM, and the on rate (kon), off rate (koff) and KD values for the binding of 35S-compound 1 were determined from kinetic measurements by fitting the data to a one-phase exponential association or decay equation (R2 value of 0.86 and 0.99 for association and dissociation, respectively). The data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments containing duplicate values in each experiment.

 

Ability of Antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 to Block the Binding of Native Ligand or 35S-Compound 1 to RPMI-8866 or Jurkat Cells. After demonstrating that 35S-compound 1 can be used to analyze {alpha}4 interactions on both RPMI-8866 and Jurkat cell lines, we were interested in determining the potency of four {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonists. Compounds were initially evaluated for their ability to block 125I-MAdCAM-Ig binding to RPMI-8866 cells and 125I-VCAM-Ig binding to Jurkat cells, in the presence of Mn2+ (Table 1). Compound 2, a recently described {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonist (Hagmann et al., 2001Go), and compound 3, a structurally related analog, inhibited binding to both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 (Table 1). An inactive analog, compound 4 (Hagmann et al., 2001Go; Egger et al., 2002Go), did not inhibit binding when tested at concentrations up to 100 µM, demonstrating the importance of specific structural features to the activities of compounds 1, 2, and 3 (Kopka et al., 2002Go; Table 1). TR14035 (Fig. 1) has been reported to potently inhibit both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 (Martin et al., 1999Go; Sircar et al., 1999aGo,1999bGo; Egger et al., 2002Go), and this was confirmed (Table 1).

After evaluating the potency of compounds in conventional {alpha}4-ligand binding assays, we determined the potency of the same four compounds to block 35S-compound 1 binding to RPMI-8866 cells in the presence of Mn2+ and 100 nM BIO7662. The concentration of 35S-compound 1 used for the binding assay was maintained at less than 150 pM, based on an IC50 of 400 pM for competition by unlabeled compound 1 (Table 1), and the results for the compounds tested are shown in Table 1. Although a small (5-fold or less) shift toward reduced potency in the 35S-compound 1/{alpha}4{beta}7 assay was observed, a similar rank order of compounds (cmpd 1 >= TR14035 > cmpd 2 > cmpd 3 >> cmpd 4) was maintained for the IC50 values when the 35S-compound 1/{alpha}4{beta}7 and 125IMAdCAM-Ig/{alpha}4{beta}7 binding assays were compared.

The ability of the same four compounds to block 35S-compound 1 binding to Jurkat cells expressing activated {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of Mn2+ was also measured. The concentration of 35S-compound 1 used for the binding assay was maintained at less than 150 pM, based on an IC50 of 2.5 and 2.3 nM for competition by unlabeled compound 1 with activated and unactivated Jurkat cells, respectively (Table 1), and the potency of compounds tested is shown in Table 1. Despite the overall shift toward reduced potency (26- to 79-fold less potent) in the 35S-compound 1/{alpha}4{beta}1 assay, the same rank order of compound IC50 values (cmpd 1 = cmpd 2 = TR14035 > cmpd 3 >> cmpd 4) was observed for the 35S-compound 1/{alpha}4{beta}1 and 125I-VCAM-Ig/{alpha}4{beta}1 binding assays.

The same four compounds were titrated for inhibition of 35S-compound 1 binding to Jurkat cells expressing unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+. As described in Table 1, the activities of compounds 2 and 3 were within 2-fold of the values observed in the 35S-compound 1/activated {alpha}4{beta}1 binding assay in the presence of Mn2+. As expected, compound 4 did not block binding of

35S-compound 1 to unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 at concentrations up to 1 mM (Table 1). Nonselective compounds, those that have relatively equal potency for activated and unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1, would be expected to follow the same rank order in both assays. Using this criterion, compounds 2 and 3 were identified as dual antagonists that are nonselective for {alpha}4{beta}1, whereas TR14035 had a 17-fold greater potency for inhibiting binding to activated {alpha}4{beta}1 than for unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1, making it a dual antagonist that is selective for activated {alpha}4{beta}1.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
35S-Compound 1 was used as a model ligand to study divergent {alpha}4{beta}7- and {alpha}4{beta}1-ligand interactions in the presence of different metal cations. 35S-Compound 1 bound both unactivated and activated states of {alpha}4{beta}1 that occur in suspension in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+ or Mn2+, respectively, but only bound activated {alpha}4{beta}7. Binding kinetics revealed that 35S-compound 1 dissociated from activated {alpha}4{beta}7 and unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1, but failed to dissociate from activated {alpha}4{beta}1 in the time frame observed. Although radiolabeled probes have been used to study the function of {alpha}4{beta}1-ligand interactions (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go), this is the first report that a dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonist can be used to elucidate the effect of divalent cations on both {alpha}4{beta}7- and {alpha}4{beta}1-ligand interactions, defining distinct binding properties of the probe for each integrin.

Integrins are known to exist in multiple affinity states in the presence of different divalent cations (Shimaoka et al., 2002Go). For many integrin-ligand interactions, including those of {beta}1, {beta}2, and {beta}3 integrins, the most efficient binding to immobilized ligand occurs in the presence of Mn2+, with less binding in the presence of Mg2+, and little or no binding in the presence of Ca2+ (Dransfield et al., 1992Go; Mould et al., 1995Go; Chen et al., 1999Go; Chigaev et al., 2001Go). Binding of cells expressing {alpha}E{beta}7 to E-cadherin is observed with 1 mM Mn2+/Mg2+/Ca2+ or with EGTA plus 10 mM Mg2+, whereas negligible binding occurs in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (Higgins et al., 1998Go). These published results are consistent with observations in this report where an 8-fold difference in affinity was detected between the binding of 35S-compound 1 to Mn2+-activated {alpha}4{beta}7 and {alpha}4{beta}7 in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+ (Fig. 3A with BIO7662). Mn2+ enhanced the binding of 35S-compound 1 to {alpha}4{beta}7 with an EC50 of 0.5 mM (Fig. 6A), whereas 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ supported binding to {alpha}4{beta}1, but not {alpha}4{beta}7 (Figs. 3A and 7B). Ca2+ alone did not support binding to {alpha}4{beta}7, and nonphysiological levels of Mg2+ were required to stimulate binding to {alpha}4{beta}7 (Fig. 6A).

The 29% reduction in the binding of compound 1 to RPMI-8866 cells in Mn2+ with 100 nM BIO7662 (Fig. 3A) added was surprising, because only a 5 to 10% drop in total counts bound was expected due to the binding to {alpha}4{beta}1 (Fig. 2A). One explanation for this finding is that with 100 nM BIO7662 added, a small fraction of the {alpha}4{beta}7 was occupied by BIO7662 and blocked binding of 35S-compound 1. To test this possibility, we reevaluated the binding of BIO7662 to {alpha}4{beta}7, but on JY cells, a human B cell line, which expresses high levels of {alpha}4{beta}7 and no detectible {alpha}4{beta}1. First, binding was evaluated using radiolabeled BIO7662. No specific measurable binding was observed with 10 nM 35S-BIO7662, supporting the observation that the affinity of BIO7662 for {alpha}4{beta}7 is low. Second, the IC50 of BIO7662 for {alpha}4{beta}7 was measured in an adhesion format in which the ability of BIO7662 to block binding of fluorescently labeled JY cells to plates coated with N-[4-(6-aminohexane-1-sulfonylamino)-2,6-dichlorobenzoyl]-4-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-L-phenylalanine trifluoroacetate-bovine serum albumin conjugate was quantified. N-[4-(6-Aminohexane-1-sulfonylamino)-2,6-dichlorobenzoyl]-4-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-L-phenylalanine trifluoroacetate (Pepinsky et al., 2002Go), an analog of compound 1 that had been engineered to contain a linker for cross-linking, was used for these studies. IC50 values in this assay of 10 µM in 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ buffer and 1 µMin1mMMn2+ verify that BIO7662 is a poor inhibitor of {alpha}4{beta}7. Although these studies support the integrin selectivity data for BIO7662, the separation under activating conditions between the IC50 of BIO7662 in the adhesion assay (1 µM) and the amount added to prevent {alpha}4{beta}1 binding, 100 nM, was not as great as was predicted from the MAdCAM-Ig binding study (Table 1), and consequently binding of BIO7662 to {alpha}4{beta}7 is likely to have accounted for the reduction in the counts bound for 35S-compound 1.

The RPMI-8866 cell line has been widely used in binding assays to identify {alpha}4{beta}7 antagonists (Carson et al., 1997Go; Shroff et al., 1998Go; Martin et al., 1999Go; Harriman et al., 2000Go). We provide the first evidence that low levels of unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 expressed on RPMI-8866 cells are capable of binding to a small molecule antagonist, such as 35S-compound 1, and we demonstrate that unactivated {alpha}4{beta}7 on a variety of cell lines does not bind 35S-compound 1. Low levels of {alpha}4{beta}1 expressed on RPMI-8866 cells do not contribute to binding of MAdCAMIg, and the binding of MAdCAM-1 to cells in suspension expressing {alpha}4{beta}7 is known to require Mn2+ (Egger et al., 2002Go). Blockade of {alpha}4{beta}1 by BIO7662 abrogated binding of 35S-compound 1 to RPMI-8866, K562/{alpha}4{beta}7, or HUT-78 cells in Ca2+/Mg2+, indicating that {alpha}4{beta}1 was responsible for binding observed in the unactivated condition (Fig. 3). Thus, the binding properties of {alpha}4 integrins coexpressed on the same cell varies depending on the state of activation.

Recent reports have described the use of radiolabeled small molecule ligands that can be used to study {alpha}4{beta}1-ligand interactions (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go). For example, 35S-BIO7662 is a specific {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonist that binds with high affinity (KD < 10 pM) to both unactivated and activated {alpha}4{beta}1 (Chen et al., 2001Go). Solution binding studies on purified {alpha}4{beta}1 identified a high-affinity site for Ca2+ that stimulates BIO7662 binding and a low-affinity site that functions independently of BIO7662 binding (Chen et al., 2001Go). Similarly, [3H]BIO1211 has been identified as a specific {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonist that binds with low affinity (KD of 20-40 nM) to unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1 but with high affinity to activated {alpha}4{beta}1 (KD of 18-100 pM) to Chen et al. (1999Go). Studies with antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1 demonstrate that the metal ion dependence of ligand binding is affected by the affinity of the ligand for {alpha}4{beta}1, because the ED50 concentrations required to support BIO7662 binding were 2-fold lower for Mn2+, 30-fold lower for Mg2+, and >1000-fold lower for Ca2+, compared with the concentrations required to support BIO1211 binding (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go).

Compared with association rates reported for BIO7662, BIO1211 and an LDV-based peptide, the association rate for compound 1 binding to {alpha}4{beta}1 in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ was greater by an order of magnitude (Chen et al., 1999Go, 2001Go; Chigaev et al., 2001Go). Consistent with published reports on the binding properties of specific {alpha}4{beta}1 antagonists, 35S-compound 1 had similar association rates for binding to unactivated and activated {alpha}4{beta}1, but dissociation rates were highly dependent on the state of activation (Fig. 8). 35S-Compound 1 rapidly dissociated from Jurkat cells expressing unactivated {alpha}4{beta}1, but dissociation from activated {alpha}4{beta}1 could not be observed even after 180 min. Although 35S-compound 1 is a lower affinity ligand than BIO1211 or BIO7662, this is the first report of a dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonist that can be used to study the metal-cation dependence of both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 binding.

Finally, observations presented here have key implications for the development of a dual {alpha}4{beta}1/{alpha}4{beta}7 antagonist that is selective or nonselective for {alpha}4{beta}1. Both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 are pharmaceutical targets for a variety of inflammatory disorders, including asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis (Gordon et al., 2001Go; Jackson, 2002Go). The two {alpha}4 integrins are unique in their ability to act both as low-affinity receptors that participate in rolling and tethering, and as high-affinity receptors that mediate firm adhesion (Bargatze et al., 1995Go; Berlin et al., 1995Go). A continuum of integrin activation states is known to exist in vivo, and the Mn2+-activated state may not resemble the highest affinity state that occurs under physiological conditions. Integrin activation through G protein-linked receptors occurs within seconds, whereas activation-dependent arrest takes minutes (Butcher, 1999Go). Because the association rate of an antagonist may be slower than the rate of integrin activation, a nonselective antagonist may be required for effective blockade of ligand binding, and nonselective neutralizing antibodies against {alpha}4 and {alpha}4{beta}7 are known to be efficacious in in vivo models (Foster, 1996Go; Butcher, 1999Go). Both a selective antagonist that blocks binding to the activated state or a nonselective antagonist will inhibit the extravasation of lymphocytes to extracellular sites. Access to integrins after they bind high-affinity ligands, however, may be limited, or it may be too late to disrupt tight binding, and a nonselective antagonist might overcome this problem.

State-selective antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1, however, may have an improved embryonic safety profile. Microinjection of a nonselective {alpha}4{beta}1 blocking antibody or continuous exposure of rat whole embryo cultures to nonselective antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1 can induce defects in chorio-allantoic fusion. Although a selective antagonist of {alpha}4{beta}1 was evaluated in this study, the lack of potency of this compound in 90% serum made it difficult to assess the role of selective antagonism on development (Spence et al., 2002Go). Furthermore, although gene knockouts of the {alpha}4 subunit or VCAM-1 have been shown to result in embryo-lethality, this is not the case for gene knockouts of {beta}7 (Butcher, 1999Go). Thus, the use of small molecule ligands to measure binding parameters of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 in different states of activation will advance our understanding of how to develop potent, efficacious, and safe antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7.


    Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to Dr. David G. Melillo (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ) for coordinating the synthesis of 35S-compound 1 and Herbert J. Jenkins (Merck Research Laboratories), Yolanda Jakubowski, Anson Chang, and Rosemary Marques (Merck Research Laboratories) for HPLC and LC/MS analysis of 35S-compound 1. We thank Dr. Russel B. Lingham and Suzanne E. Amo for initial testing of TR14035 in an {alpha}4{beta}7 ligand binding assay. We thank Qian Si for helpful discussions during the development of an 35S-compound 1 binding assay for {alpha}4. We also thank Dr. David Erle (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) for providing the K562/{alpha}4{beta}7 cell line.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Linda A. Egger, Merck and Co., Inc., Pharmacology, P.O. Box 2000, RY80W-206, Rahway, NJ 07065. E-mail: linda_egger{at}merck.com

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.047704.

ABBREVIATIONS: VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; MAdCAM-1, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; NSB, nonspecific binding; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; CS-1, connecting segment-1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; cmpd, compound.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Linda A. Egger, Merck & Co., Inc., Pharmacology, P.O. Box 2000, RY80N-A26, Rahway, NJ 07065. E-mail: linda_egger{at}merck.com


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Bargatze RF, Jutila MA, and Butcher EC (1995) Distinct roles of L-selectin and integrins {alpha}4{beta}7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer's patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3: 99-108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Berlin C, Bargatze RF, Campbell JJ, von Andrian UH, Szabo MC, Hasslen SR, Nelson RD, Berg EL, Erlandsen SL, and Butcher EC (1995) {alpha}4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow. Cell 80: 413-422.[CrossRef][Medline]

Berlin C, Berg EL, Briskin MJ, Andrew DP, Kilshaw PJ, Holzmann B, Weissman IL, Hamann A, and Butcher EC (1993) {alpha}4{beta}7 integrin mediates lymphocyte binding to the mucosal vascular addressin MAdCAM-1. Cell 74: 185-195.[CrossRef][Medline]

Butcher EC (1999) Lymphocyte homing and intestinal immunity, in Mucosal Immunology, 2nd ed (Ogra PL, Lamm ME, Bienenstock J, Mestecky J, Strober W, and McGhee JR, eds) pp 507-522, Academic Press, San Diego.

Carson KG, Schwender CF, Shroff HN, Cochran NA, Gallant DL, and Briskin MJ (1997) Sulfonopeptide inhibitors of leukocyte adhesion. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 7: 711-714.

Chen LL, Whitty A, Lobb RR, Adams SP, and Pepinsky RB (1999) Multiple activation states of integrin {alpha}4{beta}1 detected through their different affinities for a small molecule ligand. J Biol Chem 274: 13167-13175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen LL, Whitty A, Scott D, Lee W-C, Cornbese M, Adams SP, Petter RC, Lobb RR, and Pepinsky RB (2001) Evidence that ligand and metal ion binding to integrin {alpha}4{beta}1 are regulated through a coupled equilibrium. J Biol Chem 276: 36520-36529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chigaev A, Blenc AM, Braaten JV, Kumaraswamy N, Kepley CL, Andrews RP, Oliver JM, Edwards BS, Prossnitz ER, Larson RS, et al. (2001) Real time analysis of the affinity regulation of {alpha}4 integrin. The physiologically activated receptor is intermediate in affinity between resting and Mn2+ or antibody activation. J Biol Chem 276: 48670-48678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Chateau M, Chen S, Salas A, and Springer TA (2001) Kinetic and mechanical basis of rolling through an integrin and novel Ca2+-dependent rolling and Mg2+-dependent firm adhesion modalities for the {alpha}4{beta}7-MAdCAM-1 interaction. Biochemistry 40: 13972-13979.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dransfield I, Cabanas C, Craig A, and Hogg N (1992) Interaction of leukocyte integrins with ligand is necessary but not sufficient for function. J Cell Biol 116: 219-226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Egger LA, Kidambi U, Cao J, Van Riper G, McCauley E, Mumford RA, Amo S, Lingham R, Lanza T, Lin LS, et al. (2002) {alpha}4{beta}7/{alpha}4{beta}1 dual integrin antagonists block {alpha}4{beta}7-dependent adhesion under shear flow. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 153-162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Erle DJ, Briskin MJ, Butcher EC, Garcia-Pardo A, Lazarovits AI, and Tidswell M (1994) Expression and function of the MAdCAM-1 receptor, integrin {alpha}4{beta}7, on human leukocytes. J Immunol 153: 517-528.[Abstract]

Foster CA (1996) VCAM-1/{alpha}4 integrin adhesion pathway: therapeutic target for allergic inflammatory disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol 98: S270-277.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gordon FH, Lai CWY, Hamilton MI, Allison MC, Srivastava ED, Fouweather MG, Donoghue S, Greenlees C, Subhani J, Amlot PL, et al. (2001) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of a humanized monoclonal antibody to {alpha}4 integrin in active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 121: 268-274.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hagmann WK, Durette PL, Lanza T, Kevin NJ, de Laszlo SE, Kopka IE, Young D, Magriotis PA, Li B, Lin LS, et al. (2001) The discovery of sulfonylated dipeptides as potent VLA-4 antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11: 2709-2713.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harriman GCB, Schwender CF, Gallant D, Cochran NA, and Briskin MJ (2000) Cell adhesion antagonists: synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of phenylalanine based inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 10: 1497-1499.[Medline]

Higgins JMG, Mandlebrot DA, Shaw SK, Russell GJ, Murphy EA, Chen Y-T, Nelson WJ, Parker CM, and Brenner MB (1998) Direct and Regulated Interaction of Integrin {alpha}E{beta}7 with E-Cadherin. J Cell Biol 140: 197-210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jackson DY (2002) {alpha}4 integrin antagonists. Curr Pharm Des 8: 1229-1253.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jackson DY, Quan C, Artis DR, Rawson T, Blackburn B, Struble M, Fitzgerald G, Chan K, Mullins S, Burnier JP, et al. (1997) Potent {alpha}4{beta}1 peptide antagonists as potential anti-inflammatory agents. J Med Chem 40: 3359-3368.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kopka IE, Young D, Lin LS, Mumford RA, MacCoss M, Mills SG, Van Riper G, McCauley E, Egger LA, Kidambi U, et al. (2002) Substituted N-(3,5-dichlorobenzenesulfonyl)-L-prolyl-phenylalanine analogues as potent VLA-4 antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12: 637-640.[CrossRef][Medline]

Leitinger B, McDowall A, Stanley P, and Hogg N (2000) The regulation of integrin function by Ca2+. Biochim Biophys Acta 1498: 91-98.[Medline]

Leone DR, Giza K, Gill A, Dolinski BM, Yang W, Perper S, Scott DM, Lee W-C, Cornebise M, Wortham K, et al. (2003) An assessment of the mechanistic differences between two integrin {alpha}4{beta}1 inhibitors, the mAb TA-2 and the small molecule BIO5192, in rat EAE. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305: 1150-1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lin K-C, Ateeq HS, Hsiung SH, Chong LT, Zimmerman CN, Castro A, Lee WC, Hammond CE, Kalkunte S, Chen LL, et al. (1998) Selective, tight-binding inhibitors of integrin {alpha}4{beta}1 that inhibit allergic airway responses. J Med Chem 42: 920-934.

Lin LS, Lanza TJ, McCauley ED, Van Riper G, Kidambi U, Cao J, Egger LA, Mumford RA, Schmidt JA, MacCoss M, et al. (2002) Specific and dual antagonists of {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}7 integrins. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12: 133-136.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martin R, Sircar I, Liang JT, Nomura S, Morningstar MM, Gudmundsson KS, Nowlin DM, Cardarelli PM, Mah JR, Connell SA, et al. (1999) SAR of TR14035:an orally active dual {alpha}4{beta}7/{alpha}4{beta}1 integrin antagonist, in Abstracts, 218th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, MEDI 60, 1999, August 22: New Orleans, LA; American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH.

Mould AP, Akiyama SK, and Humphries MJ (1995) Regulation of integrin {alpha}5{beta}1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. Evidence for distinct classes of binding sites for Mn2+, Mg2+ and Ca2+. J Biol Chem 270: 26270-26277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muller G, Albers M, Fischer R, Hessler G, Lehmann TE, Okigami H, Tajimi M, Bacon K, and Rolle T (2001) Discovery and evaluation of piperidinyl carboxylic acid derivatives as potent {alpha}4{beta}1 integrin antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11: 3019-3021.[Medline]

Pepinsky RB, Mumford RA, Chen LL, Leone D, Amo SE, Van Riper G, Whitty A, Dolinski B, Lobb RR, Dean DC, et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of the ligand and metal Ion binding properties of integrins {alpha}9{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}1. Biochemistry 41: 7125-7141.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shimaoka M, Takagi J, and Springer TA (2002) Conformational regulation of integrin structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys Biomed Struct 31: 485-516.

Shroff HN, Schwender CF, Baxter AD, Brookfield F, Payne LJ, Cochran NA, Gallant DL, and Briskin MJ (1998) Novel modified tripeptide inhibitors of {alpha}4{beta}7-mediated lymphoid cell adhesion to MAdCAM-1. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 8: 1601-1606.[Medline]

Sircar I, Gudmundsson KS, and Martin R (1999a) Inventors, Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd. Assignee. Inhibitors of {alpha}4-mediated cell adhesion. US Patent WO 99/36393. 1999 July 22.

Sircar I, Gudmundsson KS, Martin R, Nomura S, Jayakumar H, Nowlin DM, Caradelli PM, Mah JR, Castro MA, Cao Y, et al. (1999b) Discovery of TR14035: an orally active dual {alpha}4{beta}7/{alpha}4{beta}1 integrin antagonist, in Abstracts, 218th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, MEDI 59, 1999 August 22: New Orleans, LA; American Chemical Society, Columbus, OH.

Spence S, Vetter C, Hagmann WK, Van Riper G, Williams H, Mumford RA, Lanza TJ, Lin LS, and Schmidt JA (2002) Effects of VLA-4 antagonists in rat whole embryo culture. Teratology 65: 26-37.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vanderslice P, Ren K, Revelle JK, Kim DC, Scott D, Bjercke RJ, Yeh ETH, Beck PJ, and Kogan TP (1997) A cyclic hexapeptide is a potent antagonist of {alpha}4 integrins. J Immunol 158: 1710-1718.[Abstract]

Viney JL, Jones S, Chiu HH, Lagrimas B, Renz ME, Presta LG, Jackson D, Hillan KJ, Lew S, and Fong S (1996) Mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1: a structural and functional analysis demarcates the integrin binding motif. J Immunol 157: 2488-2497.[Abstract]

Wang J-H, Pepinsky B, Stehle T, Liu J-H, Karpusas M, Browning B, and Osborn L (1995) The crystal structure of an N-terminal two-domain fragment of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1): a cyclic peptide based on the domain 1 C-D loop can inhibit VCAM-1-{alpha}4 integrin interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 5714-5718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wayner EA and Kovach NL (1992) Activation-dependent recognition by hematopoietic cells of the LDV sequence in the V region of fibronectin. J Cell Biol 116: 489-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.102.047704v1
306/3/903    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detmers, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detmers, P. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition