![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR
Sugen, Inc., South San Francisco, California (N.P., L.S., D.M., H.C., P.L, K.G.M., X.W., A.R., D.T., A.D.L., X.Y., Q.Z., C.T., G.M., A.H.); and Pharmacia Corporation, Chesterfield, Missouri (K.M.L.)
Received March 26, 2003; accepted May 14, 2003.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PDGFR
), and fibroblast
growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR-1); and no detectable activity against other
protein tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Src,
and hepatocyte growth factor receptor. In cellular assays, the selectivity for
SU10944 to inhibit VEGFR is maintained compared with other tyrosine kinases
(IC50 for SCFR of 1.6 ± 0.3 µM, for PDGFR
of 30.6
± 13.3 µM, for FGFR-1 of >50 µM, and for EGFR of >50
µM). Upon oral administration, SU10944 gave a clear dose response in the
corneal micropocket model with an ED50 value for inhibition of
neovascularization of
30 mg/kg and a maximum inhibition of 95% at 300
mg/kg. Similarly, upon oral administration in the Miles assay, SU10944
potently inhibited VEGF-induced vascular permeability. Our data indicate that
small molecule inhibitors of VEGFR signaling have the potential to ameliorate
VEGF-induced neovascularization as well as vascular permeability.
As with ocular neovascularization, elevated levels of VEGF are associated
clinically with ocular edema (Vinores et
al., 1995
; Funatsu et al.,
2002
). In preclinical models, VEGF is likewise associated with
changes in vascular integrity. Increases in ocular VEGF in diabetic animals
correlate with elevated vascular permeability, before observable retinal
proliferative changes (Sone et al.,
1997
; Gilbert et al.,
1998
). Local delivery of VEGF by intravitreal implants result in
significant increases in retinal permeability by day 3, whereas retinal
neovascularization is observed only after 14 days
(Alikacem et al., 2000
). A
similar breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier occurs in primates administered
VEGF by intravitreal implant (Ozaki et
al., 1997
).
Intervention in VEGF signaling, either by decreasing local concentrations
of ligand with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides
(Robinson et al., 1996
) or
soluble chimeric receptors (Aiello et al.,
1995
), or by inhibiting receptor signaling by small molecules
(Ozaki et al., 2000
),
decreases ocular neovascularization, thus confirming the central role of VEGF
in this process. Neovascularization in DR and AMD may differ significantly
from angiogenesis in other pathological contexts such as tumor angiogenesis
where multiple targets have been implicated, including PDGF, FGF, and IL-8
(Laird et al., 2000
;
Rofstad and Halsor, 2000
;
Shaheen et al., 2001
). Current
data strongly suggest that in diabetic retinopathy and exudative age-related
macular degeneration, VEGF is the key driver. In a preclinical model of
diabetic retinopathy, hypoxia-driven retinal neovascularization, VEGF
inhibitors are efficacious but PDGFR inhibitors are not
(Ozaki et al., 2000
).
Similarly in a model of AMD, injury-induced choroidal neovascularization, a
VEGF inhibitor decreases choroidal neovascularization
85%, but
administration of a PDGF inhibitor does not decrease choroidal
neovascularization (Kwak et al.,
2000
). The contribution of FGF to neovascularization is less well
understood. Although bFGF is expressed in neovascular membranes from AMD and
DR patients (Frank et al.,
1996
) and intravitreally administered FGF has a synergistic effect
with VEGF in producing retinal hemorrhage
(Wong et al., 2001
), retinal
neovascularization occurs upon hypoxic challenge even in the absence of bFGF
(Ozaki et al., 1998
).
Moreover, overexpression of bFGF in a transgenic mouse does not produce
retinal neovascularization nor increase the degree of neovascularization upon
hypoxia (Ozaki et al.,
1998
).
Inhibition of PDGF could have deleterious effects, particularly in the
context of DR. PDGF seems to play a special role in retinal vasculature.
Recent reports suggest that PDGF signaling is important for survival of
retinal vasculature, specifically pericytes, under conditions of hypoxic or
metabolic stress (Kodama et al.,
2001
; Hammes et al.,
2002
). In vivo, PDGF plays a role in retinal capillary coverage:
PDGFB-deficient mice (PDGFB +/-) have fewer retinal pericytes and more
acellular retinal capillaries than wild-type controls, differences that are
more pronounced in diabetic animals. In the hypoxia-induced model of
neovascularization, new vessels are twice as prevalent in PDGFB +/- mice
compared with wild-type animals (Hammes et
al., 2002
), suggesting that pericyte deficiency renders
endothelial cells more susceptible to angiogenesis. Therefore, a potential
side effect of PDGF inhibition could be to accelerate the loss of pericytes,
which are implicated in the destabilization of blood vessels during the early
stages of diabetic retinopathy. Therefore, given the lack of data supporting a
role for PDGF in retinal and choroidal neovascularization as well as the risk
of increasing pericyte dropout, a VEGF-selective inhibitor is likely the best
choice for treatment of retinopathies.
Our goal was to identify and characterize an orally available, selective VEGFR inhibitor, because angiogenesis and increased vascular permeability in DR and exudative AMD are primarily or solely driven by VEGF in these settings. A selective compound should minimize the potential toxicities resulting from the inhibition of additional kinases and be more likely to give a sufficient therapeutic index for the treatment of nonlife-threatening disease.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Kinetic Analysis. The catalytic portion of mouse VEGFR-2 was
expressed as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein after
infection of Spodoptera frugiperda (sf9) cells with engineered
baculoviruses by standard methods (King
and Possee, 1992
). GSTVEGFR-2 was purified to homogeneity from
infected sf9 cell lysates by glutathione-Sepharose chromatography
(Smith and Johnson, 1988
).
GST-fusion preparations were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and determined to
be of high purity, with no detectable breakdown products as determined using
protein staining and Western blot analysis for the GST moiety. Protein
concentration was determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent kit
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using a standard curve with bovine serum albumin
(BSA). For the SU10944 Ki determination against VEGFR-2,
biochemical kinase reactions were performed as described below (see
"Biochemical Assays") in the presence of various ATP and inhibitor
concentrations. Rates were expressed as the increase in time-resolved
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) counts per minute of reaction
within the linear reaction time. Ki values were determined
by graphical analysis of the plot of the slopes from the double reciprocal
plot versus inhibitor concentration. The final Ki value
represents the average ± the standard deviation from five independent
experiments.
Biochemical Assays. VEGFR-2 and PDGFR
TR-FRET
autophosphorylation assays were performed as described previously
(Moshinsky et al., 2003
).
Briefly, 1 nM VEGFR-2 or 5 nM PDGFR
was added to a reaction buffer
composed of 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.01% BSA, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol, containing twice the apparent Km
concentration of both ATP and N-terminal biotinylated peptide (KY-tide:
KYKKYKKKYKKKKYKYK) in a 50-µl total volume. Reactions were allowed to
proceed within the linear reaction time then terminated by the addition of 20
µl of 90 mM EDTA. Eu-W1024-labeled anti-phosphotyrosine PY20 and
Streptavidin: SureLight-Allophycocyanin (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Foster
City, CA) were diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.02% BSA and 0.1%
Tween 20 and added to a final concentration of 0.5 and 1.6 nM, respectively.
After incubation for at least 10 min, samples were excited at 340 nM, and
emissions were read at 665 nM using an LJL Analyst (LJL Biosystems, Sunnyvale,
CA). The increase in signal for both assays was determined to be
time-dependent with a requirement for ATP, peptide, kinase, and divalent metal
cation. FGFR-1 and EGFR autophosphorylation reactions were performed using
immunocaptured kinases as described previously
(Laird et al., 2000
). The HGFR
and VEGFR-1 assays were performed using poly(Glu, Tyr) 4:1 as a substrate as
described previously (Blake et al.,
2000
). For the cdk2/cyclin A assay, a scintillation proximity
assay method was used (Amersham
Pharmaceutical Assays Development Group, 1995
). The SCFR, src,
LCK/YES-related Novel tyrosine kinase, and fyn assays were performed in
standard TR-FRET format (Kolb et al.,
1998
) using peptide substrates found by screening an internal
peptide substrate library. Conditions for compound testing were saturating
peptide concentration and an ATP concentration of 2 ·
Km.
VEGFR-2 Cell Autophosphorylation Assay. Full-length mouse VEGFR-2 was cloned into the C-terminal 3xFLAG-tag expression vector p3xFLAG-CMV-14 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and grown in a 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The construct was transfected into 293T cells using LipofectAMINE2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) under manufacturer's recommendations. After transfection, cells were starved in DMEM containing no serum and 0.1% BSA for 24 h. Cells were then split into 96-well plates and treated with compound in a final concentration of 1% dimethyl sulfoxide for 2 h. Cells were lysed by the addition of HNTG (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EGTA), and lysates were transferred to polystyrene 96-well plates that had been precoated with 1 µg/well of M2 anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) to capture the 3xFLAG-tagged kinase. Quantitation of phosphorylation was performed by incubating with horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-phosphotyrosine PY99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), followed by detection with a 2,2'-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate (6)) diammonium salt color readout.
VEGFR-2 Phosphorylation Detected by Western Blot. NIH/3T3 cells stably expressing VEGFR-2 were grown to confluence in DMEM with 10% heat-inactivated calf serum and then incubated in serum-free medium containing different concentrations of SU10944 for 20 h. After stimulation with human recombinant VEGF165 (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 50 ng/ml for 10 min, cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 100 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and 2 µg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin. VEGFR-2 protein was isolated with a monoclonal anti-mouse VEGFR-2 antibody made at Sugen, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA), designated L4. Phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 was then analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting using biotin-labeled anti-phosphotyrosine PY99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Total VEGFR-2 levels were assessed by stripping and reprobing the membrane with anti-VEGFR-2 antibody L4 (Sugen, Inc.).
VEGFR-2 Cellular Functional Assay. The assay is an immunoassay for the quantitative detection of human tissue factor. HUVECs were seeded at 50,000 cell/well in growth medium (endothelial cell basal medium; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) + 10% fetal bovine serum with complete supplements containing human epidermal growth factor (0.5 ml/500 ml), hydrocortisone (0.5 ml/500 ml), gentamicin sulfate amphotericin-B (0.5 ml/500 ml), and bovine brain extract (2 ml/500 ml) (BioWhittaker) in 24-well plates coated with 0.2% gelatin. Cells were grown for 2 days to >90% confluence and then treated with SU10944 and human recombinant VEGF165 (R & D Systems) at 50 ng/ml or PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; Sigma-Aldrich) at 10 nM for 4 h; negative control cells received media only. Cells were lysed with HNTG lysis buffer plus EDTA (1:100), protease inhibitor (1:100), and PMSF (1:100) in 125 µl/well for 20 min at 4°C. Cell lysates were processed using an IMUBIND tissue factor ELISA kit (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, CT). Briefly, lysates were transferred to 96-well format precoated micro-test strips and incubated at 4°C overnight. The microtest strips were washed four times with wash buffer, and 100 µl of biotinylated anti-human tissue factor antibody was added to each well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing four times, 100 µl of diluted streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody was added to each well, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed four times with wash buffer and incubated with 100 µl of tetramethyl-benzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) substrate solution for 20 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by the additional of 50 µl of H2SO4 solution, and absorbance was read on a microplate reader at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Functional Cellular Assays for SCFR, EGFR, PDGFR
, and
FGFR-1. For EGFR, PDGFR
, and FGFR-1, the functional activity of the
receptor was measured by a ligand-induced BrdU incorporation assay in 3T3
cells that endogenously express both FGFR-1 and PDGFR
but not EGFR. A
single cell line stably transfected with EGFR was used for all assays. Cells
seeded in a 96-well plate were made quiescent by serum deprivation for 24 h
and then stimulated with FGF2/bFGF (1.5 nM), epidermal growth factor (4 nM),
or PDGF (3.8 nM) in the absence or presence of the indicated concentrations of
SU10944 for 20 h. BrdU was added for a 2-h labeling period, and the cells were
fixed. The amount of BrdU incorporation was determined with an
anti-BrdU-peroxidase-conjugated antibody using an ELISA kit (Roche
Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Cell viability after exposure to compounds in
the assay format was assessed by substituting the addition of BrdU with
resazurin (1 mg/ml) at 1:100 after the 20-h incubation. After a 3-h
incubation, the absorbance of the samples are measured at 630 nm in
"dual wavelength" mode with a filter reading at 450 nm, as a
reference wavelength, on a Dynatech ELISA plate reader. Compound was added to
wells in the dilutions used to determine IC50 values, including a
negative control in which all components were included except for cells and a
positive control in which all components except compound were added. The
resazurin assay is based upon the conversion of the dark blue resazurin dye to
a pink dye in proportion to the metabolic activity of the cells
(O'Brien et al., 2000
). For
each IC50 value, the standard deviation is reported.
The functional activity of SCFR was assessed using a SCF-dependent cell proliferation/survival assay. MO7e cells were grown and expanded in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum in the presence of IL-3 (10 ng/ml) and granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor (10 ng/ml). After counting, cells were pelleted by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS. Cells were resuspended in medium containing either IL-3 or SCF (100 ng/m) and aliquoted into 96-well plates at 50,000 cells/well along with varying concentrations of SU10944. After incubation for 3 d at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2, live cells were quantified by their ability to metabolize resazurin as described above.
Corneal Angiogenesis Model. An intrastromal pocket was surgically
created in one or both corneas of each anesthetized Sprague-Dawley female rat.
A slow release hydron/sucralfate pellet containing 150 ng of human recombinant
VEGF165 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) was inserted into the pocket as
described previously (Kenyon et al.,
1996
), the pocket closed to self-seal, and the rats given
analgesia and topical antibiotic ointment applied once to the eye. The rats
recovered from anesthesia on a warming pad and were returned to their cages.
SU10944 was administered daily by gavage in a 1.0-ml suspension of 0.5%
methylcellulose (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.025% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) to four to
six rats per dose group beginning the day before implant, and continuing the
length of the study. Four days after surgery, the corneas of the
reanesthetized rats were examined under a slit lamp microscope and the
neovascular response was quantified by measuring the average new vessel length
(VL), the corneal radius (r = 2.6 mm), and the contiguous
circumferential zone (CH = clock hours where 1 CH is 30°), and applied to
the formula area (in square millimeters) = (CH/12) x
3.14(r2 - (r - VL)2). The rats were
then immediately euthanized. Eyes from rats that developed infection as a
result of the surgery were not included in the study. Six to eight eyes were
included per dosing group. The neovascular areas of the vehicle and 250-mg/kg
dosed rat corneas were dissected from the eye, flat mounted, and photographed
at 4x with a digital camera mounted on a microscope. Rat corneas
implanted with pellets containing no growth factor (placebo pellets) generated
no new blood vessel growth (Leahy et al.,
2002
). All animal treatment protocols were reviewed by and were in
compliance with Pharmacia's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Miles Assay for Vascular Permeability. The Miles assay for vascular
permeability (Miles and Miles,
1952
) was adapted to athymic mice as follows. Mice were given a
single oral dose of SU10944 or vehicle alone. Simultaneously or at designated
later time points, 100 µl of 0.5% Evan's blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS
was administered intravenously via the tail vein. One hour later, mice were
injected intradermally (in duplicate sites on their backs) with 400 ng of VEGF
(human recombinant VEGF165; R & D Systems) dissolved in 20
µl of PBS or (in adjacent duplicate sites) with PBS alone. After an
additional 30 min, VEGF-dependent dye leakage from the vasculature into skin
was assessed visually and scored semiquantitatively (100, 50, or 0% inhibition
for each spot). Two spots per animal allowed each animal to be scored as
representing 100, 75, 50, 25, or 0% inhibition. Low-level background effects
from time-matched vehicle-treated groups were subtracted out.
Determination of SU10944 Plasma Levels. Plasma samples (100 µl), SU10944 standard or quality control samples in mouse blank plasma were mixed with acetonitrile (300 µl) containing DL-propranolol hydrochloride (internal standard) in a 96-well polypropylene plate (Orochem Technology, Westmont, IL). The plate was mixed by vortex for 1 min and the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm. Ten microliters of the supernatant was injected onto the liquid chromatograph tandem mass spectrometry system where separation occurred on a BDS HYPERSIL C18 (5 µm, 100 x 4.6 mm) reverse-phase HPLC column (Keystone Scientific, Foster City, CA). The amount of SU10944 and the internal standard in each mouse plasma sample was quantified based on standard curves generated using known amounts of compound ranged from 5 to 10,000 ng/ml. Standard curve samples and quality control samples of SU010944 were prepared by spiking 10 µl of stock standard solutions with 90 µl of blank plasma.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After the identification of SU10944 as an inhibitor of VEGFR-2 in
biochemical assays (IC50 of 96 ± 20 nM), we went on to
further assess the biochemical activity of the compound against other kinases,
as well as its potential to act as a competitor for ATP. SU10944 exhibited
competitive inhibition with respect to ATP for VEGFR-2. This is indicated by
the fact that the lines from the double reciprocal plot
(Fig. 2) converge on the
y-axis. The Ki value was determined to be 21
± 5 nM. In a panel of kinase assays, SU10944 potently inhibited VEGFR-2
with an IC50 of 96 ± 20 nM and exhibited even greater
activity against VEGFR-1 with an IC50 of 6 ± 1 nM
(Fig. 3). It showed some
activity against other closely related family members, for example,
PDGFR
and FGFR-1 but exhibited significantly less activity against other
receptors (Table 1). The
compound is not a pan-kinase inhibitor because no discernible inhibition of
more distantly related tyrosine kinases was evident, e.g., EGFR and Src.
|
|
|
We then used a panel of three cell-based assays to determine whether the compound could cross the cellular membrane and inhibit VEGFR-2 within cells. In 293T cells transiently transfected with mouse VEGFR-2, SU10944 exhibited an IC50 of 227 ± 80 nM for receptor autophosphorylation as measured by ELISA (Fig. 4A). Similarly, in an assay to assess the functional activity of endogenous VEGFR-2 in HUVECs, tissue factor production stimulated by VEGF was inhibited with an IC50 value of 102 ± 27 nM (Fig. 4B). However, SU10944 did not inhibit PMA-stimulated release of tissue factor (Fig. 4B). Final confirmation that the compound inhibits VEGFR-2 receptor phosphorylation was obtained by Western blot analysis of 3T3 cells engineered to express mouse VEGFR-2 (Fig. 4C). After cells were pretreated with compound and stimulated with VEGF, VEGFR-2 was immunoprecipitated and then detected on the blot with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. SU10944 inhibited receptor autophosphorylation confirming the results of the 293 assay in a different cell type and assay formats.
|
For kinases against which SU10944 was active in biochemical assays,
cellular assays were performed to determine whether the activity was
maintained in a more physiological setting
(Table 2). Similar to the
observations in the panel of biochemical assays, significantly higher
concentrations of compound were required to inhibit a closely related subgroup
of family members such as FGFR-1, SCFR, and PDGFR
than was required for
the inhibition of VEGFR-2 in functional assays. The functional activities of
the FGFR-1, PDGFR
, and EGFR were measured by ligand-induced cell
proliferation of 3T3 cells as measured by BrdU incorporation. For SCFR, the
activity was measured by the SCF-dependent survival of MO7e cells. SU10944 did
not exhibit detectable inhibition of EGFR or FGFR-1 (IC50 values
> 50 µM). Furthermore, SU10944 was not cytotoxic: the LD50
value was >50 µM for 3T3 cells.
|
We then assessed the ability of SU10944 to inhibit angiogenesis and
vascular permeability in vivo when administered by the oral route. In the rat
corneal micropocket model of angiogenesis, a VEGF pellet is implanted in the
cornea to stimulate neovascularization. In this model, the compound
significantly decreased the angiogenesis, both the number of vascular sprouts
as well as the length of the sprouts (Fig.
5). Moreover, SU10944 gave a clear dose response with an
ED50 of
50 mg/kg for inhibition of neovascularization
(Fig. 6). To increase potential
exposure levels upon oral administration by decreasing dissolution rate
limitations of the compound, we prepared an in situ sodium salt of SU10944 and
repeated the experiment. The sodium salt decreased the apparent
ED50 value slightly, to approximately 30 mg/kg. In addition, a
maximum inhibition of 95% was achieved at the highest dose of 300 mg/kg.
Increased exposure upon administration of the sodium salt was confirmed in
pharmacokinetic studies (data not shown).
|
|
In the Miles assay for vascular permeability
(Miles and Miles, 1952
), a
visualization dye is administered intravenously, followed by a bolus
administration of VEGF by the intradermal route. Leakage of the dye in the
skin indicates a local increase in vascular permeability. In this assay,
SU10944 inhibited VEGF-induced vascular permeability in a time- and
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
7a). Maximum inhibition was observed at the earliest time point (1
h), with decreasing levels of inhibition over the course of 24 h. At 100
mg/kg, the maximum inhibition of vascular permeability was sustained to 2 h,
and a 50% reduction in response was still apparent 24 h postdose. In contrast,
at the 30-mg/kg dose maximum inhibition was seen at 1 h and decreased
dramatically over 24 h to zero. Plasma concentrations of SU01944 were also
determined and correlated with inhibition
(Fig. 7b). Based on the total
data set that reflects a range of doses and times postadministration of
compound, we conclude that SU10944 plasma exposures of 250 ng/ml (844 nM)
result in 50% inhibition of VEGF-mediated vascular permeability in vivo.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From a panel of biochemical and cellular assays, we conclude that SU10944
is a relatively selective inhibitor with a strong preference for VEGFRs. The
kinase activity of both VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 are potently inhibited by the
compound, with low- to mid-nanomolar IC50 values. Some activity was
observed in the biochemical assays, particularly against other members of the
class III receptor tyrosine kinases, for example, PDGFR
(1000 ±
83 nM) and SCFR (1580 ± 270 nM). SU10944 exhibited little or no
activity against the other kinases surveyed, which represent a range of
tyrosine kinases as well as some serine/threonine kinases. We limited our
cellular assays to those kinases that had shown activity in biochemical
assays, plus one more distantly related kinase. Consistent with the
biochemical observations, the compound displayed very limited cross-reactivity
in the cellular functional assays. The most notable cross-reactivity occurred
against SCFR (IC50 of 1600 ± 300 nM); however, compared with
VEGFR functional readout (IC50 of 102 ± 27 nM), there was an
18-fold selectivity. Selectivity at the cellular level was good compared with
PDGFR
(IC50 of 30.6 ± 13.3 µM), with a ratio of
340x.
Although SU10944 inhibited the kinase activity of purified VEGFR-2 with an
IC50 of 96 ± 20 nM, when the compound was tested in cellular
assays the apparent IC50 value shifted to 227 ± 80 nM in the
autophosphorylation assay but was in very close agreement with the functional
assay (IC50 of 102 ± 27 nM). A more notable discrepancy was
observed between the IC50 values for the kinase activity of
purified PDGFR
(1,000 ± 83 nM) compared with the cellular assay
(IC50 of 30.6 ± 13.3 µM). Modest discrepancies between
the biochemical and cellular values are not uncommon findings with small
molecule enzyme inhibitors because the physical properties of the compounds as
well as the assay format become important when translating from biochemical to
cellular activity. To inhibit activity of the kinase within a cellular
context, the compound must cross the cell membrane and retain activity in the
presence of cellular proteins. In addition, differences in assay formats can
influence the observed IC50 values.
In the context of potential treatments for exudative AMD and diabetic retinopathy, a therapeutic molecule should inhibit both neovascularization as well as increased vascular permeability to be maximally effective. In preclinical models, SU10944 potently inhibited both VEGF-induced angiogenesis and vascular permeability after administration by the oral route. In the corneal micropocket model of angiogenesis, we observed a clear dose response with a maximal inhibition of nearly 100%. Compound levels obtained by oral administration clearly achieved sufficient exposure levels to inhibit the functional activity of the receptor. Similarly, in the Miles assay of vascular permeability, a time- and dose-dependent response was observed. The maximum response was nearly 100%, confirming that in a second species and different model, pharmacologically relevant levels of drug were achieved by oral administration.
We note that there is a discrepancy between the in vitro potency of SU10944 (227 ± 80 nM in the autophosphorylation assay, 102 ± 27 nM in the functional assay) and its in vivo activity as measured in the vascular permeability assay (EC50 cut-off estimated to be 833 nM). Although there can be many reasons for such observed differences in the translation from in vitro to in vivo results, the main source in this case is likely to be high plasma protein binding of the compound. Other compounds in the series have been shown to have high protein binding; our data suggest protein binding of >98% (data not shown). The unbound concentration of SU10944 in vivo would therefore be roughly 16 nM, a value in better agreement with our in vitro observations.
To develop the compound for potential use in the treatment of human ocular
disease, the efficacy of the compound in more relevant disease models, as well
as the potential safety of the compound with systemic administration will
require careful investigation. The activity of the compound in human retinal
endothelial cells and in more physiologically relevant animal models such as
retinal vascular permeability in streptozoticin-induced rats, hypoxia-driven
retinal angiogenesis in mouse neonates, and laser injury-induced choroidal
neovascular model of AMD should be determined. In addition, the therapeutic
index of such compounds will be essential to establish because of potential
mechanism-based toxicities with systemically administered VEGFR inhibitors,
particularly in the context of diabetic comorbidities. One area of particular
concern is whether VEGFR inhibitors will further impair coronary collateral
formation in diabetic patients, in response to myocardial ischemia. Collateral
vessel development occurs by the process of arterio-genesis, the expansion of
existing arterioles, a process that is differentially regulated from
angiogenesis. Monocyte migration into the area of ischemia is a key process in
the formation of the collateral vessels. Current evidence suggests that
impaired collateral vessel formation in diabetic individuals results from a
signaling defect downstream of VEGFR-1 in monocytes
(Waltenberger, 2001
), which
normally respond to VEGF-A by increased migration. Because the signaling via
VEGFR-1 is already impaired in diabetic patients, it remains to be determined
whether a VEGFR-1 inhibitor would be additive or neutral for collateral
formation, or whether a selective VEGFR-2 inhibitor would be preferred for
treatment of diabetic retinopathy.
Unlike VEGFR-2, VEGFR-1 has not been implicated directly in mediating VEGF-induced angiogenesis or vascular permeability. However, inhibition of VEGFR-1 may be beneficial in AMD where macrophage infiltration has been suggested to play a role in the etiology of the disease. VEGF produced by hypoxic retinal pigmented epithelial cells has been postulated to act as a chemotactic factor for macrophages, which can then secrete additional VEGF as well as other proangiogenic factors.
We have identified and characterized a novel small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-2, SU10944. This compound is a potent, ATP-competitive inhibitor of VEGFR-2 biochemical activity and is active in the nanomolar range in cellular assays. SU10944 can be administered in vivo by the oral route and achieves sufficient exposure to inhibit nearly all VEGF-stimulated neovascularization and vascular permeability. A selective, well tolerated VEGFR inhibitor, administered orally or by local delivery, should be of therapeutic benefit in both diabetic retinopathy and exudative age-related macular degeneration. In addition, we believe compounds of this nature will be valuable in delineating the role of VEGF in various forms of pathological angiogenesis where multiple kinases may play contributing roles. Clinical trials will be necessary to show the potential prophylactic or therapeutic utility of these novel and selective VEGFR inhibitors in human eye diseases. The discovery of a multiple VEGFR inhibitors representing a variety of pharmacophores offers the opportunity to generate new molecules with increased potency or improved pharmaceutical properties by rational design based on cocrystals with VEGFR-2.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: DR, diabetic retinopathy; AMD, age-related macular
degeneration; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PDGFR
,
platelet-derived growth factor receptor
; FGFR-1, fibroblast growth
factor receptor-1; IL, interleukin; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor;
VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; GST, glutathione
S-transferase; TR-FRET, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy
transfer; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HGFR, hepatocyte growth factor receptor;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; HUVEC, human umbilical vein
endothelial cell; EGFR, human epidermal growth factor receptor; ELISA,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; BrdU, 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine; PBS,
phosphate-buffered saline; SCF, stem cell factor; SCFR, stem cell factor
receptor; SU10944,
3-[5-methyl-2-(2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-indol-3-ylidenemethyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-proprionic
acid.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Neela Patel, Discovery Biology, Sugen, Inc., 230 E. Grand Ave., South San Francisco, CA 94080. E-mail: neela.patel{at}sugen.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adamis AP, Miller JW, Bernal MT, Damico DJ, Folkman J, Yeo TK, and Yeo KT (1994) Increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthal 118: 445-450.[Medline]
Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST,
Pasquale LR, Thieme H, Iwamoto MA, Park JE, et al. (1994)
Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic
retinopathy and other retinal disorders. New Engl J
Med 331:
1480-1487.
Aiello LP, Pierce EA, Foley ED, Takagi H, Chen H, Riddle L, Ferrara
N, King GL, and Smith LEH (1995) Suppression of retinal
neovascularization in vivo by inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF) using soluble VEGF-receptor chimeric proteins. Proc Nat Acad
Sci USA 92:
10457-10461.
Alikacem N, Yoshizawa T, Nelson KD, and Wilson CA
(2000) Quantitative MR imaging study of intravitreal sustained
release of VEGF in rabbits. Investig Ophthalmol Vis
Sci 41:
1561-1569.
Amersham Pharmaceutical Assays Development Group (1995) Measurement of cdk2 activity using a [33P]ATP scintillation proximity assay. Proximity News 18: 1-4.
Blake RA, Broome MA, Liu X, Wu J, Gishizky M, Sun L, and
Courtneidge SA (2000) SU6656, a selective Src family kinase
inhibitor, used to probe growth factor signaling. Mol Cell
Biol 20:
9018-9027.
Frank RN, Amin RH, Eliott D, Puklin JE, and Abrams GW (1996) Basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are present in epiretinal and choroidal neovascular membranes. Am J Ophthal 122: 393-403.[Medline]
Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Ikeda T, Nakanishi Y, Kitano S, and Hori S (2002) Increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in the aqueous humor of diabetics with macular edema. Am J Ophthal 133: 70-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gilbert RE, Vranes D, Berka JL, Kelly DJ, Cox A, Wu LL, Stacker SA, and Cooper ME (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in control and diabetic rat eyes. Lab Investig 78: 1017-1027.[Medline]
Hammes H-P, Lin J, Renner O, Shani M, Lundqvist A, Betsholtz C,
Brownlee M, and Deutsch U (2002) Pericytes and the pathogenesis
of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes
51:
3107-3112.
Kenyon BM, Voest EE, Chen CC, Flynn E, Folkman J, and D'Amato RJ
(1996) A model of angiogenesis in the mouse cornea.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
37:
1625-1632.
King LA and Possee RD (1992) The Baculovirus Expression System: A Laboratory Guide, Chapman & Hall, London.
Kodama T, Oku H, Kawamura H, Sakagami K, and Puro DG (2001) Platelet-derived growth factor-BB: a survival factor for the retinal microvasculature during periods of metabolic compromise. Curr Eye Res 23: 93-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kolb AJ, Kaplita PV, Hayes DJ, Park Y-W, Pernell C, Major JS, and Mathis G (1998) Tyrosine kinase assays adapted to homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence. Drug Disc Today 3: 333-342.[CrossRef]
Kwak N, Okamoto N, Wood JM, and Campochiaro PA (2000)
VEGF is a major stimulator in model of choroidal neovascularization.
Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci
41:
3158-3164.
Laird AD, Vajkoczy P, Shawver LK, Thurnher A, Liang C, Mohammadi M,
Schlessinger J, Ullrich A, Hubbard SR, Blake RA, et al. (2000)
SU6668, a broad spectrum angiogenesis inhibitor, exhibits potent anti-tumor
activity in xenograft models, including regression of established tumors.
Cancer Res 60:
4152-4160.
Leahy KM, Ornberg RL, Wang Y, Zweifel BS, Koki AT, and Masferrer JL
(2002) Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by celecoxib reduces
proliferation and induces apoptosis in angiogenic endothelial cells in vivo.
Cancer Res 62:
625-631.
Miles AA and Miles EM (1952) Vascular reactions to histamine, histamine-liberator and leukotaxine in the skin of guinea pigs. J Physiol (Lond) 118: 228-257.
Moshinsky DJ, Ruslim L, Blake RA, and Tang F (2003) A widely applicable, high-throughput TR-FRET assay for the measurement of kinase autophosphorylation: VEGF receptor 2 as a prototype. J Biomol Screening, in press.
O'Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, and Pognan F (2000) Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem 267: 5421-5426.[Medline]
Ozaki H, Hayashi H, Vinores SA, Moromizato Y, Campochiaro PA, and Oshima K (1997) Intravitreal sustained release of VEGF causes retinal neovascularization in rabbits and breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier in rabbits and primates. Exp Eye Res 64: 505-517.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ozaki H, Okamoto N, Ortega S, Chang M, Ozaki K, Sadda S, Vinores
MA, Derevjanik N, Zack D, Basilico C, et al. (1998) Basic
fibroblast growth factor is neither necessary nor sufficient for the
development of retinal neovascularization. Am J Pathol
153:
757-765.
Ozaki H, Seo MS, Ozaki K, Yamada H, Yamada E, Okamoto N, Hofmann F,
Wood JM, and Campochiaro PA (2000) Blockade of vascular
endothelial growth factor receptor signaling is sufficient to completely
prevent retinal neovascularization. Am J Pathol
156:
697-707.
Robinson GS, Pierce EA, Rook SL, Foley E, Webb R, and Smith LEH
(1996) Oligodeoxynucleotides inhibit retinal neovascularization
in a murine model of proliferative retinopathy. Proc Nat Acad Sci
USA 93:
4851-4856.
Rofstad EK and Halsor EF (2000) Vascular endothelial
growth factor, interleukin 8, platelet-derived endothelial growth cell factor
and basic fibroblast growth factor promote angiogenesis and metastasis in
human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res
60:
4932-4938.
Shaheen RM, Tseng WW, Davis DW, Liu W, Reinmuth N, Vellagas R,
Wieczorek AA, Ogura Y, McConkey DJ, Drazan KE, et al. (2001)
Tyrosine kinase inhibition of multiple angiogenic growth factor receptors
improves survival in mice bearing colon cancer liver metastases by inhibition
of endothelial cell survival mechanisms. Cancer Res
61:
1464-1468.
Smith DB and Johnson KS (1988) Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene 67: 31-40.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sone H, Kawakami Y, Okuda Y, Sekine Y, Honmura S, Matsuo K, Segawa T, Suzuki H, and Yamashita K (1997) Ocular vascular endothelial growth factor levels in diabetic rats are elevated before observable retinal proliferative changes. Diabetologia 40: 726-730.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun L, Tran N, Liang C, Hubbard S, Tang F, Lipson K, Schreck R, Zhou Y, McMahon G, and Tang C (2000) Identification of substituted 3-[(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indol-2-yl)methylene]-1,3-dihydroindol-2-ones as growth factor receptor inhibitors for VEGF-R2 (Flk-1/KDR), FGF-R1 and PDGF-R tyrosine kinases. J Med Chem 43: 2655-2663.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun L, Tran N, Liang C, Tang F, Rice A, Schreck R, Waltz K, Shawver LK, McMahon G, and Tang C (1999) Design, synthesis, and evaluations of substituted 3-[(3-or 4-carboxyethylpyrrol-2-yl)methylidenyl]indolin-2-ones as inhibitors of VEGF, FGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinases. J Med Chem 42: 5120-5130.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun L, Tran N, Tang F, App H, Hirth P, McMahon G, and Tang C (1998) Synthesis and biological evaluations of 3-substituted indolin-2-ones: a novel class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors that exhibit selectivity toward particular receptor tyrosine kinases. J Med Chem 41: 2588-2603.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vinores SA, Kuchle M, Mahlow J, Chiu C, Green WR, and Campochiaro PA (1995) Blood-ocular barrier breakdown in eyes with ocular melanoma. A potential role for vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor. Am J Pathol 147: 1289-1297.[Abstract]
Waltenberger J (2001) Impaired collateral vessel
development in diabetes: potential cellular mechanisms and therapeutic
implications. Cardiovasc Res
49:
554-560.
Wong CG, Rich KA, Liaw L-HL, Hsu HT, and Berns MW (2001) Intravitreal VEGF and bFGF produce florid retinal neovascularization and hemorrhage in the rabbit. Curr Eye Res 22: 140-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yarden Y and Ullrich A (1988) Growth factor receptor
tyrosine kinases. Annu Rev Biochem
57:
443-478.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Santulli, W. A. Kinney, S. Ghosh, B. L. DeCorte, L. Liu, R. W. A. Tuman, Z. Zhou, N. Huebert, S. E. Bursell, A. C. Clermont, et al. Studies with an Orally Bioavailable {alpha}V Integrin Antagonist in Animal Models of Ocular Vasculopathy: Retinal Neovascularization in Mice and Retinal Vascular Permeability in Diabetic Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 894 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Potapova, A. D. Laird, M. A. Nannini, A. Barone, G. Li, K. G. Moss, J. M. Cherrington, and D. B. Mendel Contribution of individual targets to the antitumor efficacy of the multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11248 Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2006; 5(5): 1280 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tussiwand, N. Onai, L. Mazzucchelli, and M. G. Manz Inhibition of Natural Type I IFN-Producing and Dendritic Cell Development by a Small Molecule Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor with Flt3 Affinity J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3674 - 3680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Tissot van Patot, G. Leadbetter, L. E. Keyes, J. Bendrick-Peart, V. E. Beckey, U. Christians, and P. Hackett Greater free plasma VEGF and lower soluble VEGF receptor-1 in acute mountain sickness J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2005; 98(5): 1626 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pietras and D. Hanahan A Multitargeted, Metronomic, and Maximum-Tolerated Dose "Chemo-Switch" Regimen is Antiangiogenic, Producing Objective Responses and Survival Benefit in a Mouse Model of Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2005; 23(5): 939 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||