JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on May 15, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.052431


0022-3565/03/3062-532-537$20.00
JPET 306:532-537, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.052431v1
306/2/532    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veng-Pedersen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Widness, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veng-Pedersen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Widness, J. A.

ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM, AND EXCRETION

A Differential Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Erythropoietin Receptor Population in Newborn and Adult Sheep

P. Veng-Pedersen, S. Chapel, N. H. Al-Huniti, R. L. Schmidt, E. M. Sedars, R. J. Hohl, and J. A. Widness

The Colleges of Pharmacy (P.V.-P., N.H.A.-H.) and Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics (R.L.S., E.M.S., J.A.W.) and Internal Medicine (R.J.H.), University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; and Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, New Jersey (S.C.)

Received April 1, 2003; accepted April 28, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Strong evidence indicates that erythropoietin (Epo) is eliminated via Epo receptors (EpoR). Epo receptors may be classified as erythropoietic receptors that are largely located on erythroid progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM) and nonerythropoietic receptors present in most tissues. Epo's elimination kinetics was studied using a very sensitive tracer interaction method (TIM) before and after chemical ablation of BM as an indirect way of evaluating the EpoR through an assortment of pharmacokinetic parameters (VM, KM, K, and CL) used in differentiating the EpoR population in newborn and adult sheep. TIM identified a parallel nonlinear Michaelis-Menten (VM and KM), and linear (K) elimination pathway and found the latter pathway to be significantly (p < 0.01) more dominant in lamb: K/(VM/KM + K) = 0.309 (25.3) versus 0.0895 (18.4) mean (CV%) lambs versus adult sheep. The significantly (p < 0.01) larger total clearance found for lambs indicates a larger nonhematopoietic tissue clearance of Epo (CL = 118 (10.9) ml/h/kg versus 67.8 (19.3) lamb versus adult sheep). The VM/KM ratio for the nonlinear pathway was not found to be significantly different (p > 0.05) between newborn and adults with values of 1.10 (15.8) and 1.30 (3.81) h1, respectively. We proposed the hypothesis that the linear pathway is via nonhematopoietic EpoR. Assuming that Epo's elimination largely depends not only on erythropoietic EpoR but also on nonhematopoietic EpoR, this work shows a significant difference in the relative proportions of the two EpoR populations in lamb and adult sheep. The larger dominance of the nonhematopoietic EpoR in lamb supports the hypothesis that these receptors are more needed in early life, e.g., providing neuroprotection from perinatal hypoxemic-ischemic episodes.


Erythropoietin (Epo) is a 34-kDa glycoprotein hormone the primary function of which is to regulate erythrocyte production by stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of erythroid progenitors (Fisher, 2003Go). Epo exerts this effect by binding to specific cell-surface receptors (EpoRs) on erythroid progenitor cells located primarily in the bone marrow (Sawada et al., 1990Go). In recent years, EpoRs have been identified in numerous nonhematopoietic tissues outside the bone marrow (Juul et al., 1998Go). An increasing number of recent reports have demonstrated and postulated Epo's nonhematopoietic role in the development and protection of the central nervous system, and possibly other effects (Juul et al., 2001Go). The relative proportions and quantities of the erythropoietic and nonhematopoietic EpoRs in the body are not known in addition to how these quantities may change during development. Epo receptor mRNA analysis of isolated heterogeneous tissue samples provides only a microscopic local picture that cannot be extrapolated to consider the body as a whole. Also, gene expression does not always equate with protein expression. The objective of this study is to further our understanding of the EpoR population in vivo. We present a pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis that looks at the macroscopic PK effect of the EpoRs in vivo using a sensitive, tracer-based methodology that we refer to as the tracer interaction method (TIM) (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1997Go). The TIM approach enables an in vivo analysis of not only the quantity of EpoRs but also their binding characteristics. Because the latter differ among distinct receptor populations the TIM may be used to distinguish these populations. In the present study, we have combined the TIM methodology with chemical ablation of the EpoR population in the bone marrow to augment the differentiation of the EpoR population.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
All procedures with animals received prior approval from the local University Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were housed in an indoor, light- and temperature-controlled environment and were maintained in good health throughout the study period. Jugular venous catheters for blood sampling were surgically placed days before the first TIM study under pentobarbital anesthesia, and ampicillin (1 g b.i.d.) was administered the first three postoperative days. Four adult sheep [weight = 23.8 (CV% 11) kg], and four newborn sheep [6.45 (CV% 15) kg] with postnatal ages from 8 to 9 days were used in the experiments. Each animal underwent two TIM experiments (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1997Go). The first TIM experiment was conducted before chemical ablation of the bone marrow with busulfan. The second TIM experiment was conducted 8 to 10 days after the start of the busulfan ablation. Thus, the analysis involved a total of 32 sets of plasma level data, namely, 16 sets of 125I-r-HuEpo tracer data, and 16 sets of "cold" r-HuEpo data. Each of the 16 tracer data sets consisted of approximately 36 plasma level versus time data points, and each of the 16 cold data sets consisted of approximately 22 data points. Overall, the analysis used approximately 930 plasma level data points.

Blood Level Assay
Plasma samples were assayed for 125 I-r-HuEpo using a sensitive and specific, double antibody immunoprecipitation assay developed in our laboratory (Widness et al., 1992aGo) with a lower level of detection of 0.004 mU/ml. Plasma r-HuEpo concentration was measured in triplicate using a double-antibody radioimmunoassay (Widness et al., 1986Go). Linear assay values for r-HuEpo concentrations are obtained between 10 and 450 mU/ml in the sheep RIA. To reduce assay variability all samples were measured in the same assay. To assess CFU-E and BFU-E, samples from the bone marrow before and after busulfan treatment were cultured as described previously (Clapp et al., 1995Go). Colonies derived from CFU-Es were counted after 6 days of incubation, whereas BFU-E colonies were counted after 9 days of incubation.

Study Protocol
Ablation by Busulfan. Busulfan was administered orally twice a day in a dose of 11 mg/kg/day for three consecutive days. Ampicillin (1 g b.i.d.) was administered daily for the first 3 days before the busulfan treatment, and again daily after the start of the treatment. Animals were clinically monitored for adverse effects of the chemotherapy such as weight loss, hair loss, blood in urine or stools, fever, unusual bleeding or bruising, and loss of appetite.

TIM Experiments. A detailed description of the theory and principles of the TIM methodology has been published previously (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1997Go). Briefly, each TIM experiment consists of two stages: 1) an initial 0.10 U/kg i.v. bolus dose of an 125I-r-HuEpo tracer (specific activity, 1.42 x 106 cpm/U) immediately followed by an i.v. infusion at 0.70 mU/kg/min of the tracer to the end of the experiment. 2) An i.v. bolus of the r-HuEpo nontracer administered at the plateau of the tracer (around 4 h).

The immediate, abrupt rise in the plasma tracer level seen after the bolus dose of the r-HuEpo nontracer, as seen in Figs. 1 and 2, top, is a result of the nonlinear Epo elimination. Similarly, the absence of such a perturbation in the tracer level, as seen in Figs. 1 and 2, bottom, after the BM ablation signifies a lack of nonlinearity, i.e., demonstrates linearity in the disposition kinetics.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. TIM experiment conducted in an adult sheep before and after busulfan treatment. The curves shown fitted simultaneously to the 125I-r-HuEpo tracer data (squares) before and after busulfan treatment (top and bottom panels) are given by eqs. 1 and 2. The nontracer r-HuEpo data (+) are fitted by a general cross validation cubic spline function. The arrow indicates the time when r-HuEpo is injected.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. TIM experiment conducted in a newborn sheep before and after busulfan treatment. The curves shown fitted simultaneously to the 125I-r-HuEpo tracer data (squares) before and after busulfan treatment (top and bottom panels) are given by eqs. 1 and 2. The nontracer r-HuEpo data (crosses) are fitted by a general cross-validation cubic spline function. The arrow indicates the time when r-HuEpo is injected.

 

Data Analysis. The tracer plasma level data were analyzed according to the TIM-based PK model given by eqs. 1 and 2 using the interactive WINFUNFIT computer program for general nonlinear regression, written for the Windows (Microsoft, Remond, WA) platform, evolved from the original FUNFIT program (Veng-Pedersen, 1977Go):

(1)

(2)
The convolution type (* denotes convolution), integro-differential equations (eqs. 1 and 2) describe the tracer plasma level in the TIM experiments in the presence and absence of a nonlinear elimination pathway, respectively, corresponding to the "before" and "after" ablation conditions. Equation 1 applied before the busulfan marrow ablation considers an elimination via two routes, namely, a nonlinear route corresponding to the Michaelis-Menten terms VM/(KM + cb) and VM/(KM + ca), and a linear route corresponding to the first-order elimination rate constant K. The terms ca and cb denote the plasma concentration profiles of the 125I-r-HuEpo tracer and the cold r-HuEpo, respectively. The rate of infusion of the tracer is denoted by R and the volume of distribution by V. Equation 2, applied after the ablation, contains only the linear elimination pathway (K) remaining after the nonlinear pathway has been obliterated by the busulfan BM ablation. Equation 2 is the function used to describe the tracer data (curve fitted to square symbols) in the ablated state as shown in the lower panel of Figs. 1 and 2. Equation 2 is obtained from eq. 1 by deleting the nonlinear terms VM/(KM + ca) and VM/(KM + cb) corresponding to the nonlinear elimination pathway. In the above-mentioned equations KM and VM are the Michaelis-Menten parameters, G and g are distribution function parameters, and T is the time when the i.v. bolus dose of the cold erythropoietin is injected (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1997Go).

Equations 1 and 2 are conveniently converted to the following equivalent equations (eqs. 3 and 4). These new equations are simpler to deal with computationally because they do not involve a convolution operation. Equations 3 to 5 are ordinary first-order differential equations that in contrast to the original equations (eqs. 1 and 2) can be solved numerically by regular first-order differential equation software:

(3)

(4)

(5)
The variable z introduced in eqs. 3 to 5 is a dummy variable that has the exact same effect as the convolution term in eqs. 1 and 2. Equations 3 to 5 were used in the curve fittings. A cross-validation cubic spline (Hutchinson and deHoog, 1985Go) fitted to the unlabeled r-HuEpo data were used to represent the cold r-HuEpo plasma concentration profile, cb in eq. 3. The numerical integration solution, ca(t), of the two components of eq. 3 is fitted using WINFUNFIT to the tracer data for the pre- (t < T) and post- (t > T) cold r-HuEpo administration phases before the ablation. This fitting of eq. 3 to the preablation tracer data is done simultaneously with the fitting of eq. 4 to the tracer data acquired after the complete ablation (occurring 8–10 days after busulfan treatment; Chapel et al., 2001Go).

The clearance parameter (CL) of drugs with nonlinear elimination kinetics is not a constant parameter, but is concentration-dependent. However, a unique clearance parameter denoted the linear clearance is the clearance corresponding to "very small" concentrations of erythropoietin, defined as concentrations much smaller that the KM value, i.e., c « KM which gives VM/(KM + c) ~ VM/KM. Accordingly, the clearance ("linear clearance") reported in this work (Table 1) is calculated as follows:

(6)

(7)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters determined from simultaneous fitting of eqs. 3 and 4 to plasma level data acquired before and after bone marrow ablation

 


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The correlation coefficients between predicted (eqs. 1 and 2) and observed Epo tracer concentrations were 0.994 and 0.991 for the newborn and adult data, respectively, showing a good agreement with the data for the proposed TIM model.

Busulfan Ablation Effects
Effect on Elimination Kinetics. The ablation of the bone marrow by busulfan had a marked effect on the elimination kinetics of Epo as determined by the TIM experiments. This effect is clearly shown in the representative plots in Figs. 1 and 2, where the top panel (preablation TIM data) shows a significant perturbation in the tracer data (square symbols) caused by the bolus injection of the nontracer (+ symbol) at about 4 h. The pronounced perturbation is absent in the bottom panel in the ablated state. This phenomenon was consistently observed in all eight animals. The finding that the bone marrow ablation changes the elimination kinetics from nonlinear to linear, corresponding to an elimination of the nonlinear elimination pathway (eqs. 1 and 2), was further tested. This was done in the fully ablated state 9 days after the start of the busulfan treatment by two additional experiments using significantly larger bolus doses of the nontracer r-HuEpo. In these experiments, the standard r-HuEpo dose of 100 U/kg was increased to 400 and 4000 U/kg. Doing so did not result in a detectable perturbation in the tracer level (data not shown), further confirming the linear elimination kinetics in the ablated state. Nonlinearity may still exist at higher concentrations; however, a dosing as high or higher than 4000 U/kg is not met in current clinical practice.

Effect on Volume of Distribution (V). The volume of distribution was not found to change significantly (p > 0.05) as a result of the ablation, with before/after ablation values [mean (CV%)] for newborns of 74.4 (5.24)/78.2 (15.0) ml/kg and for adults of 47.5 (20.5)/58.0 (20.0) ml/kg.

Effect on CL. The ablation resulted in a substantial reduction in the tracer clearance in both adult and newborn sheep (p < 0.01; Table 1).

Newborn Compared with Adult Sheep
CL before Ablation. Newborns had a significantly (p < 0.01) larger clearance before ablation than adults, with CL values of 118 (10.9) and 67.8 (19.8) ml/h/kg, respectively (Table 1).

CL after Ablation. The newborns also had a significantly (p < 0.01) larger clearance after the ablation than adults, with CL values of 39.8 (40.8) and 7.62 (39.8) m/h/kg, respectively (Table 1).

Reduction in CL Resulting from the Ablation. With the reduction in clearance expressed in a relative manner as (CL after ablation)/(CL before ablation), the newborn showed a significantly smaller reduction resulting from the ablation (p < 0.05) with values of 0.333 (37.3) and 0.110 (19.6) for newborns and adults, respectively.

First-Order Elimination Rate Constant (K) for the Nonablated Elimination Pathway. The elimination rate constant for the nonablated elimination pathway was found to be significantly larger for the newborns than the adults with values of 0.498 (33.2) and 0.128 (17.9) h1, respectively (Table 1).

"First-Order" Elimination Rate Constant (VM/KM) for the Ablated Elimination Pathway. The first-order elimination rate constant corresponding to low concentrations (c « KM) for the ablatable elimination pathway was not found to be significantly different between newborns and adults, with values of 1.10 (15.8) and 1.30 (3.81) h1, respectively (Table 1).

Michaelis-Menten Parameter KM. The KM parameter for the ablated elimination pathway was not found to be significantly different (p > 0.05) between newborns and adults with values of 425 (17) and 523 (15) mU/ml, respectively. The values are similar to reported in vitro binding affinity ka values for humans and animal erythroid progenitors cell lines expressing EpoR, i.e., 240 to 2400 mU/ml (Sawyer, 1990Go).

The maximum plasma concentration of the tracer was consistently less that 4500 cpm/ml, which corresponds to about 3 mU/ml. Thus, the tracer concentration, ca, was all the time well into to linear range (ca « Km). Accordingly, the Vm/(Km + ca) term in eq. 3 t <= T becomes Vm/Km, and the TIM analysis can as discussed previously (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1997Go) be done by measuring the tracer in cpm per milliliter units without the need for converting to milliunits per milliliter. This is a convenient advantage because an accurate determination of the specific activity of biologicals can be a problem.

Michaelis-Menten Parameter VM. The VM parameter for the ablated elimination pathway was not found to be significantly different (p > 0.05) between newborns and adults with values of 455 (34) and 682 (24) mU/ml/h, respectively.

Relative Dominance of the Nonablated Elimination Pathway [K/(VM/KM + K)]. The relative dominance of the nonablated elimination pathway was found to be significantly larger for newborns than adults, with values of 0.309 (25.3) and 0.0895 (18.4), respectively (Table 1).

Ablation by Busulfan. No CFU-E colonies were found after 6 days of incubation for bone marrow aspirates drawn at days 8 and 13 after busulfan treatment. In contrast, prebusulfan aspirates yielded 29 CFU-E colonies/105 cells in CFU-E cultures. Similarly, when those samples were incubated for 9 days, 29, 3, and 0 colonies/105 cells in BFU-E culture were observed for the samples drawn on day –1, 8, and 13, respectively. Microscopic analysis of bone marrow core biopsies showed no significant cellularity after the busulfan treatment.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Contrary to most nonprotein type of drugs, the kidneys and liver are not considered important in the in vivo elimination of Epo (Widness et al., 1996Go; Yoon et al., 1997Go). Also, the long-term stability of Epo in whole blood at room temperature indicates that no significant biotransformation takes place in blood (Widness et al., 1984Go; Kendall et al., 1991Go). However, the possibility of a tissue-based, extrarenal, extrahepatic elimination, e.g., via proteolysis cannot be completely ruled out. An increasing amount of evidence suggests that the metabolic fate of Epo is largely depending on the bone marrow containing EpoR carrying progenitor cells that eliminate Epo through endocytosis of the EpoR-Epo complex followed by lysosomal degradation (Sawyer, 1990Go; Sawyer and Hankins, 1993Go; Fisher, 2003Go). The hypothesis of a receptor-based elimination is consistent with previous findings that most growth factors, neuropeptides, and biologically active endogenous polypeptides are eliminated via receptor-based endocytosis (Gammeltoft, 1991Go).

Erythroid progenitor mass has been shown to be a determinant of serum Epo concentration at a given hemoglobin level (Cazzola et al., 1998Go). Subjects infected with human parvovirus (B19) showed a severe loss of EpoR-carrying erythroid precursor cells, resulting in a pronounced increase in the Epo plasma level that was nearly inversely related to the presence of red blood cell progenitors. It was suggested that this relationship reflects Epo's binding to receptors (Potter et al., 1987Go). After observing that plasma Epo levels remained abnormally high in sublethally irradiated dogs after the cessation of hypoxia, Stohlman concluded that plasma Epo levels were significantly "influenced by the functional state of the erythroid tissue of the marrow" (Stohlman, 1959Go). Other studies have documented that plasma Epo levels increase after bone marrow ablation in excess of that expected by a reduction in hemoglobin alone (Grace et al., 1991Go; Davies et al., 1995Go). Several studies have reported nonlinearity in Epo's PK in which its plasma clearance decreases with increasing Epo doses (Kato et al., 1997aGo; Yoon et al., 1997Go) consistent with a Michaelis-Menten-type elimination kinetics.

EPO's nonlinear behavior has been documented in various animal species, including rats (Kato et al., 1997bGo), mice (Kato et al., 1998Go), rabbits (Yoon et al., 1997Go), sheep (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1999Go), and humans (Flaharty et al., 1990Go; Veng-Pedersen et al., 1995Go, 1999Go).

The fact that the ablation of the bone marrow changes the elimination kinetics from nonlinear (linear + nonlinear) to purely linear (eqs. 1 and 2; Figs. 1 and 2) supports the hypothesis that the nonlinear elimination kinetics is due to elimination via the EpoR pool located in the bone marrow. However, the possibility that the nonlinearity present before ablation is due to both a nonlinear and linear binding component of the EpoR in the bone marrow cannot be completely ruled out.

It is well recognized that EpoRs exist in many tissues other than the bone marrow (Juul et al., 2001Go; Nagai et al., 2001Go). The role of these nonhematopoietic receptors is not well understood. However, recent reports have indicated that at least some of these receptors seem to have a neuroproctective role in protection from hypoxemic-ischemic insults (Juul, 2002Go). Busulfan ablation is considerably more selective in ablating bone marrow cells than most other tissues' cells in the body, including tissues where mRNA for EpoR have been detected (Carlini et al., 1999Go). Thus, it does not seem very likely that such EpoR cells outside the bone marrow will be much affected by the busulfan treatment.

The PK parameters obtained by the TIM analysis provides an indirect quantification of the EpoR populations under the well supported assumption that Epo's elimination is via EpoRs. From this assumption, it follows from simple kinetic principles that the quantity of ablateable EpoR is proportional to VM/KM and the quantity of receptors remaining after the busulfan ablation is proportional to K. The total ablation of the bone marrow makes it possible to "isolate" the receptors outside the bone marrow. This is of particular interest considering the discovery of the neuroprotective role of Epo (Juul, 2002Go) and the recent attention to Epo's possible nonhematopoietic importance in development.

Based on the analysis of the data from this study (Table 1), we propose the following Epo receptor development (ERD) hypothesis: the nonerythroid receptors are most dominant while playing an important role in early development. Their relative importance diminishes later in development when Epo's role is more directed at ensuring proper tissue oxygenation by production of red blood cells.

The ERD hypothesis suggests that the observation that severe hypoxemic-ischemic episodes in the life of mammals occurring at birth, e.g., perinatal asphyxia. The effect of such episodes may be mitigated to a greater extent in newborn relative to adult (Dawes, 1968Go). As discussed below, our PK analysis supports this ERD hypothesis under the assumptions that 1) a significant fraction of the receptors located outside BM is aimed at neuroprotection, and 2) Epo is primarily eliminated via its Epo receptors. With respect to assumption 1 we propose that the elimination of Epo after the bone marrow ablation is primarily via nonhematopoietic receptors, as quantified by the rate constant K.

Our PK analysis does not provide an analysis of the function(s) of the proposed nonhematopoietic EpoR population; we can only speculate that it involves receptors associated with neuroprotective and other yet to be discovered effects. The large amount of evidence of Epo's elimination via erythropoietic EpoR in the bone marrow supports the hypothesis that nonerythropoietic Epo receptors outside the bone marrow are also involved in the elimination. Accordingly, the quantification of the elimination by VM/KM in combination with K (Table 1) gives a "reference" from which an indirect measure of the relative importance of the nonhematopoietic EpoR population can be obtained. This measure is given by K/(VM/KM + K) (Table 1), which is the fraction of Epo that is eliminated via the nonhematopoietic pathway. This fraction is significantly (p < 0.05) larger in the newborn than adult sheep, indicating that the linear elimination, i.e., the nonhematopoietic EpoR population, is more dominant in lamb than adult sheep.

The reduction in the total clearance expressed as the ratio (CL after ablation)/(CL before ablation) also shows a significantly (p < 0.05) smaller reduction for newborn [0.333 (37.3) versus 0.110 (19.6)], again supporting the ERD hypothesis. Moreover, looking at the nonhematopoietic elimination pathway in an absolute, rather than relative sense, gives the same consistent picture: the value for K is significantly (p < 0.05) larger for the newborn compared with adult sheep. Our finding of a significantly (p < 0.05) larger total clearance for the newborn in the nonablated state compared with adult sheep is consistent with our previous findings (Widness et al., 1992bGo). This may be explained by the more pronounced elimination via nonerythropoietic EpoR in newborn as evident by a smaller reduction in the total clearance by the BM ablation.

The use of a tracer in PK analysis is based on the assumption that the tracer behaves in an identical kinetic manner to that of the parent drug, which is never exactly the case. However, the difference is usually so small that the analysis results provide reliable, useful information about the parent drug. In any case, when analyzing the PK disposition with an unknown endogenous production under dynamically variable conditions such as in the present study, there is no alternative to the use of a tracer.

It is difficult to predict whether the current study extrapolates to humans. However, because Epo genetically is well preserved across mammalian species, and because of an excellent similarity in the PK between sheep and humans (Veng-Pedersen et al., 1999Go), we believe such an extrapolation is indeed possible, but the final answer will have to wait until a safe (nonradioactive) r-HuEpo tracer is developed enabling the ERD hypothesis to be tested in humans.


    Acknowledgements
 
The recombinant human EPO used in the EPO RIA was a gift from Dr. H. Kinoshita (Chugai Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The rabbit EPO antiserum used in the EPO RIA was a generous gift from Dr. Gisela K. Clemens. We gratefully acknowledge the technical advice on CFU-E cultures from Dr. Wade Clapp (Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN).


    Footnotes
 
ABBREVIATIONS: Epo, erythropoietin; EpoR, erythropoietin receptor; PK, pharmacokinetics; TIM, tracer interaction method; r-HuEpo, recombinant human erythropoietin; RIA, radioimmunoassay; CFU-E, colony-forming unit-erythroids; BFU-E, burst forming units erythroids; BM, bone marrow; CL, clearance; ERD, Epo receptor development.

This work was supported by the U.S. Public Health Service National Institute of Health Grants P01 HL46925, R21, and GM57367, and Grant RR000359 from the General Clinical Research Center Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.

DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.052431.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Peter Veng-Pedersen, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail veng{at}uiowa.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Carlini RG, Alonzo EJ, Dominguez J, Blanca I, Weisinger JR, Rothstein M, and Bellorin-Font E (1999) Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on endothelial cell apoptosis. Kidney Int 55: 546–553.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cazzola M, Guarnone R, Cerani P, Centenara E, Rovati A, and Beguin Y (1998) Red blood cell precursor mass as an independent determinant of serum erythropoietin level. Blood 91: 2139–2145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chapel SH, Veng-Pedersen P, Hohl RJ, Schmidt RL, McGuire EM, and Widnes JA (2001) Changes in erythropoietin pharmacokinetics following busulfan-induced bone marrow ablation in sheep: evidence for bone marrow as a major erythropoietin elimination pathway. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 820–827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clapp DW, Freie B, Lee WH, and Zhang YY (1995) Molecular evidence that in situ-transduced fetal liver hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells give rise to medullary hematopoiesis in adult rats. Blood 86: 2113–2122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davies SV, Fegan CD, Kendall R, Beguin Y, and Cavill I (1995) Serum erythropoietin during autologous bone marrow transplantation: relationship to measures of erythroid activity. Clin Lab Haematol 17: 139–144.[Medline]

Dawes GS (1968) Birth Asphyxia Ressucitation and Brain Damage. Year Book Medical Publisher Inc., Chicago.

Fisher JW (2003) Erythropoietin: physiology and pharmacology update. Exp Biol Med 224: 1–14.

Flaharty KK, Caro J, Erslev A, Whalen JJ, Morris EM, Bjornsson TD, and Vlasses PH (1990) Pharmacokinetics and erythropoietic response to human recombinant erythropoietin in healthy men. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47: 557–564.[Medline]

Gammeltoft S (1991) Receptor-mediated endocytosis and degradation of polypeptide hormones, growth factors and neuropeptides, in Degradation of Bioactive Substances: Physiology and Pathophysiology (Henriksen JH) pp 140–165, chapter 5, CRC Press, Boston.

Grace RJ, Kendall RG, Chapman C, Hartley AE, Barnard DL, and Norfolk DR (1991) Changes in serum erythropoietin levels during allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Haematol 47: 81–85.[Medline]

Hutchinson MF and deHoog FR (1985) Smoothing noise data with spline functions. Numer Math 47: 99–106.

Juul S (2002) Erythropoietin in the central nervous system and its use to prevent hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Acta Paediatr Suppl 438: 36–42.

Juul SE, Ledbetter DJ, Joyce AE, Dame C, Christensen RD, Zhao Y, and DeMarco V (2001) Erythropoietin acts as a trophic factor in neonatal rat intestine. Gut 49: 182–189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Juul SE, Yachnis AT, and Christensen RD (1998) Tissue distribution of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in the developing human fetus. Early Hum Dev 52: 235–249.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kato M, Kamiyama H, Okazaki A, Kumaki K, Kato Y, and Sugiyama Y (1997a) Mechanism for the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of erythropoietin in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 283: 520–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kato M, Kato Y, and Sugiyama Y (1997b) Mechanism of the upregulation of erythropoietin-induced uptake clearance by the spleen. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 283: 520–527.

Kato M, Miura K, Kamiyama H, Okazaki A, Kumaki K, Kato Y, and Sugiyama Y (1998) Pharmacokinetics of erythropoietin in genetically anemic mice. Drug Metab Dispos 26: 126–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kendall RG, Chapman C, Hartley AE, and Norfolk DR (1991) Storage and preparation of samples for erythropoietin radioimmunoassay. Clin Lab Haematol 13: 189–196.[Medline]

Nagai A, Nakagawa E, Choi HB, Hatori K, Kobayashi S, and Kim SU (2001) Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptors in human CNS neurons, astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes grown in culture. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60: 386–392.[Medline]

Potter CG, Potter AC, Hatton CSR, Chapel HM, Anderson MJ, Pattison JR, Tyrrell DAJ, Higgins PG, Willman JS, Parry HF, et al. (1987) Variation of erythroid and myeloid precursors in the marrow and peripheral blood of volunteer subjects infected with human parvovirus (B19). J Clin Investig 79: 1486–1492.

Sawada K, Krantz SB, Dai CH, Koury ST, Horn ST, Glick AD, and Civin CI (1990) Purification of human blood burst-forming units-erythroid and demonstration of the evolution of erythropoietin receptors. J Cell Physiol 142: 219–230.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sawyer ST (1990) Receptors for Erythropoietin. Distribution, Structure and Role in Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis in Erythroid Cells, Plenum Press, New York.

Sawyer ST and Hankins WD (1993) The functional form of the erythropoietin receptor is a 78-kDa protein: correlation with cell surface expression, endocytosis and phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 6849–6853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stohlman F (1959) Observations on the physiology of erythropoietin and its role in the regulation of red cell production. Ann NY Acad Sci 77: 710–724.

Veng-Pedersen P (1977) Curve fitting and modelling in pharmacokinetics and some practical experiences with NONLIN and a new program FUNFIT. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 5: 513–531.[CrossRef][Medline]

Veng-Pedersen P, Widness JA, Pereira LM, Peters C, Schmidt RL, and Lowe LS (1995) Kinetic evaluation of nonlinear drug elimination by a disposition decomposition analysis. Application to the analysis of the nonlinear elimination kinetics of erythropoietin in adult humans. J Pharm Sci 84: 760–767.[CrossRef][Medline]

Veng-Pedersen P, Widness JA, Pereira LM, Schmidt RL, and Lowe LS (1999) A comparison of nonlinear pharmacokinetics of erythropoietin in sheep and humans. Biopharm Drug Dispos 20: 217–223.[CrossRef][Medline]

Veng-Pedersen P, Widness JA, Wang J, and Schmidt RL (1997) A tracer interaction method for nonlinear pharmacokinetics analysis: application to evaluation of nonlinear elimination. J Pharmacokin Biopharm 25: 569–593.[Medline]

Widness JA, Clemons GK, Garcia JF, Oh W, and Schwartz R (1984) Increased immunoreactive erythropoietin in cord serum after labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148: 194–197.[Medline]

Widness JA, Garcia JF, Clemons GK, Cavalieri RL, Susa JB, Teramo KA, and Schwartz R (1986) Temporal response of immunoreactive erythropoietin to acute hypoxemia in the sheep fetus. Pediatr Res 20: 15–19.[Medline]

Widness JA, Schmidt RL, Veng-Pedersen P, Modi N, and Sawyer ST (1992a) A sensitive and specific erythropoietin immunoprecipitation assay: application to pharmacokinetic studies. J Lab Clin Med 119: 285–294.[Medline]

Widness JA, Veng-Pedersen P, Modi NB, Pereira LM, Schmidt RL, and Lowe LS (1992b) Erythropoietin nonlinear pharmacokinetics in newborn lambs (Abstract). Exp Hematol 20: 778.

Widness JA, Veng-Pedersen P, Schmidt RL, Lowe LS, Kisthard JA, and Peters C (1996) In vivo 125I-erythropoietin pharmacokinetics are unchanged after anesthesia, nephrectomy and hepatectomy in sheep. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 279: 1205–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoon WH, Park SJ, Kim IC, and Lee MG (1997) Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human erythropoietin in rabbits and 3/4 nephrectomized rats. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 96: 227–240.[Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. H. Al-Huniti, J. A. Widness, R. L. Schmidt, and P. Veng-Pedersen
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Paradoxal Regulation of Erythropoietin Production in Acute Anemia
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2004; 310(1): 202 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.052431v1
306/2/532    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veng-Pedersen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Widness, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veng-Pedersen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Widness, J. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition