JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on April 29, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.051037


0022-3565/03/3062-478-483$20.00
JPET 306:478-483, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.051037v1
306/2/478    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, N.

GASTROINTESTINAL, HEPATIC, PULMONARY, AND RENAL

Renal Action of Acute Chloroquine and Paracetamol Administration in the Anesthetized, Fluid-Balanced Rat

Mohamed H. Ahmed, Richard J. Balment, and Nick Ashton

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Received February 28, 2003; accepted April 16, 2003.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chloroquine induces diuresis, natriuresis, and an increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the rat. These responses are modified in rats with analgesic nephropathy induced by long-term paracetamol (acetaminophen) administration. Here, the effects of acute paracetamol treatment on renal function and the response to chloroquine are reported. Under intraval anesthesia (100 mg kg1) male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 6/group) were infused with 2.5% dextrose for 3 h. After a control hour, they received either vehicle, chloroquine (0.04 mg h1), paracetamol (priming dose of 210 mg kg1 followed by 110 mg kg1h–1) or chloroquine and paracetamol over the next hour. Compared with vehicle, chloroquine infusion resulted in increases in GFR (2.4 ± 0.3 versus 4.8 ± 0.6 ml min1), urine flow (4.2 ± 0.3 versus 10.4 ± 0.7 ml h1), and sodium excretion (47.7 ± 4.1 versus 171.2 ± 18.6 µmol h1) and a reduction in urine osmolality (223.2 ± 5.9 versus 121.7 ± 23.9 mOsM kg1). Paracetamol reduced sodium excretion but had no effect on urine flow, GFR, or urine osmolality. When combined, paracetamol blocked the chloroquine-induced diuresis (3.9 ± 0.7 ml h1) and natriuresis (22.6 ± 8.5 µmol h1), attenuated the increase in glomerular filtration rate (3.5 ± 0.2 ml min1), and raised urine osmolality (280.0 ± 22.8 mOsM kg1). The differing effects of acute and long-term paracetamol treatment on basal and chloroquine-mediated renal function suggest that the length of prior exposure to paracetamol, and thus the presence of analgesic nephropathy, is an important determinant of the renal response to chloroquine.


Chloroquine is a widely used antimalarial agent (Sharma and Mishra, 1999Go), often also used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erytheromatosis (Ducharme and Farinotti, 1996Go). In addition to these therapeutic effects, we have shown that chloroquine has a number of pronounced renal actions that seem to be mediated, at least in part, by nitric oxide (Musabayane et al., 1994Go; Ahmed et al., 2003aGo). Chloroquine infusion in the anesthetized rat resulted in marked increases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine flow, and sodium excretion rate, accompanied by a reduction in urine osmolality. All of these responses could be blocked by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, suggesting that nitric oxide plays a role in mediating these renal actions of chloroquine (Ahmed et al., 2003aGo).

Chloroquine is often taken against a background of chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ingestion in regions where malaria is prevalent. NSAIDs such as aspirin and paracetamol (known as acetaminophen in the United States) are taken regularly to reduce fever associated with malaria; hence, people living in these regions are likely to ingest paracetamol on a regular basis over a long period of time (Chada, 1998Go; Eddleston, 2000Go). One consequence of this is an increased risk of developing analgesic nephropathy.

Paracetamol is a rapid, reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of cyclooxygenase activity and thus products of the arachidonic acid cascade (Hardman et al., 2001Go). At doses within the therapeutic range, it affects renal function, lowering renal blood flow, GFR, sodium excretion, and prostaglandin E2 excretion in both human and the rat (Prescott et al., 1989Go; Trumper et al., 1998Go). Paracetamol also exerts acute and chronic nephrotoxic effects. Acute toxicity after ingestion of large doses (10–15 g) is characterized by necrosis and damage to the proximal tubule. Chronic ingestion of much lower doses (500–1000 mg) can produce renal damage, resulting in analgesic nephropathy (Blantz, 1996Go). This is defined as habitual ingestion of an analgesic, which after an insidious onset, leads to renal papillary necrosis and chronic interstitial nephritis with progressive renal failure (Henrich, 1998Go).

We have recently described a model of subclinical analgesic nephropathy in the rat induced by ingestion of paracetamol at 500 mg kg1 b.wt. day1 for 30 days (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). This treatment regime did not produce gross renal histological changes associated with clinical nephropathy, such as papillary necrosis and interstitial nephritis, but it did reduce the urinary concentrating ability of the animals. Previous studies have shown that treatment at this dose for up to 20 weeks is required to induce renal histopathological changes (Nanra et al., 1973Go), reflecting the relative resistance of the rat to analgesic nephropathy.

In the same study (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo), we also assessed the effect of chronic paracetamol treatment on the renal actions of chloroquine. The response to chloroquine of rats with analgesic nephropathy was markedly different from that in untreated animals. The diuresis, natriuresis, and increase in GFR seen with chloroquine alone were all reversed when chloroquine was infused in rats that had previously been treated with paracetamol (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). This could be attributable to either the acute inhibitory effect of paracetamol on prostaglandin synthesis (Hardman et al., 2001Go) or long-term loss of urine-concentrating ability arising through papillary necrosis and interstitial nephritis, which are typical of analgesic nephropathy (Henrich, 1998Go).

We could not distinguish between these two possible mechanisms in the previous study (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo), because animals continued to receive paracetamol in their drinking water up until the time that renal function was assessed. Paracetamol has a plasma half-life of 2 to 4 h, being inactivated in the liver (Hardman et al., 2001Go), and its excretion rate is markedly reduced by renal impairment (Prescott et al., 1989Go), so it is highly likely that paracetamol remained in the circulation of these animals during the measurement of their renal function. Consequently, we may have observed acute paracetamol-mediated effects on chloroquine's actions on the kidney in addition to those attributable to analgesic nephropathy alone. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine the renal action of acute paracetamol infusion and its influence on chloroquine-mediated changes in renal function in the absence of long-term paracetamol-induced changes in the kidney. This was achieved by assessing renal function in previously untreated rats receiving acute infusion of either paracetamol or chloroquine, or a combination of the two drugs.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All experiments were performed under the authority of a UK Home Office Project License and received local ethical committee approval.

Animal Preparation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River (Margate, Kent, UK) and were held in the School of Biological Sciences where they had free access to food (Beekay Rat and Mouse Standard Diet; Bantin and Kingman Ltd., Hull, UK) and water, with a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle before experimentation. The weight of animals at renal function study was between 330 and 340 g. Animals were anesthetized with intraval (100 mg kg1 b.wt., thiopentone sodium BP; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Limited, Nenagh, Co Tipperary, Ireland) and transferred to a hot-plate that maintained body temperature, monitored by a rectal probe, at 37°C throughout the experiment. Cannulae were inserted into an external jugular vein, carotid artery, and the bladder and a tracheotomy was performed, as described previously (Ahmed et al., 2003aGo,bGo).

The Servo-Controlled Fluid Replacement System. Euvolemic fluid replacement of spontaneous urine output was achieved using a servo-controlled fluid replacement system, as described previously (Ahmed et al., 2003aGo,bGo). Briefly, urine flow rate, determined gravimetrically, is transmitted to an adjustable pump via a computer. A program developed at the University of Manchester (Burgess et al., 1993Go) allows the infusion rate of the pump to be automatically adjusted to precisely replace intravenously the volume of fluid lost as urine. Clearance marker ([3H]inulin in 2.5% dextrose, 6 µCi h1; Amersham Biosciences UK, Ltd., Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) is delivered via a second, slow, constant infusion pump (1 ml h1).

Experimental Protocol. After surgery, a bolus dose of [3H]inulin (6 µCi) was injected via the venous cannula and servo-infusion replacement initiated. All animals were allowed a 3-h equilibration period, after which animals were assigned to vehicle (n = 6), paracetamol (n = 6), chloroquine (n = 6), or paracetamol/chloroquine (n = 6) groups for the remaining 3 h of the experiment. All rats received 2.5% dextrose replacement for a 1-h control period. The vehicle animals continued to receive 2.5% dextrose for the remaining 2 h of the experiment. In the chloroquine-treated group, infusion of chloroquine (0.04 mg h1 chloroquine diphosphate; Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, Dorset, UK; previously shown in our hands to affect renal function in the anesthetized rat; Ahmed et al., 2003aGo,bGo) was started via the constant infusion pump for 1 h, after which the infusate was switched to 2.5% dextrose for the final hour of the experiment.

In the paracetamol-treated group, paracetamol was administered initially as a loading dose of 210 mg kg1 immediately after the control hour, followed by a continuous infusion at 110 mg kg1 h1 for 2 h (Jang et al., 1994Go; Sigma-Aldrich). In the final group, a loading dose of paracetamol was given after the control hour after which combined paracetamol and chloroquine infusion commenced for an hour. Chloroquine infusion ceased after 1 h and rats continued to receive paracetamol for the final hour. Urine samples were collected every 10 min after the equilibration period, and blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 h postequilibration. Blood samples (0.6 ml) were collected from the carotid artery, and a similar volume of dextrose solution was replaced. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at 4°C before analysis.

Analysis. Urine and plasma sodium concentrations were measured by flame photometry (Corning 480; Corning Ltd., Halstead, Essex, UK) and osmolality by freezing point depression (Roebling osmometer; LH Roebling, Berlin, Germany). [3H]Inulin was determined using a 1900CA Tri-Carb liquid scintillation analyzer (Canberra Industries, Meriden, CT) beta-counter.

Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows (standard version 10.1.0; SPSS UK Ltd., Woking, Surrey, UK). Comparisons between groups over time were by repeated measures ANOVA, and comparisons within control, treatment, or recovery periods were by ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test. Significance was ascribed at the 5% level.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Urine Flow Rate. Urine flow rate throughout the 3 h postequilibration period is shown in Fig. 1. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant effects both over time (F3,62 = 26.2, p < 0.001) and between drug treatments (F3,21 = 5.4, p < 0.01). Over the control hour, before paracetamol or chloroquine infusion, urine flow rate did not differ between the groups. Paracetamol infusion alone had no effect on urine flow rate by comparison with vehicle-infused rats (Fig. 1A). In contrast, chloroquine treatment induced a significant increase in urine flow rate (Fig. 1B) by comparison with vehicle-treated rats (post hoc SNK test vehicle versus chloroquine, p < 0.05). This continued into the postchloroquine recovery hour, reaching a peak of 12.2 ± 1.9 ml h1 (p < 0.05 versus vehicle) at the end of the 3rd hour. Combined infusion of paracetamol and chloroquine reversed the diuretic response to chloroquine alone (Fig. 1B; p < 0.05 versus chloroquine alone), returning urine flow to a rate comparable with paracetamol alone and vehicle-infused rats (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Urine flow rate in rats infused with vehicle (n = 6) or paracetamol (n = 6) (A) or chloroquine (n = 6) or paracetamol and chloroquine (n = 6) (B). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. The 1st h represents the control period during which all animals received 2.5% dextrose. In the 2nd h chloroquine and/or paracetamol infusion commenced, whereas the 3rd hour represents the postchloroquine recovery phase. Repeated measures ANOVA was significant over time (F3,62 = 26.2, p < 0.001) and between drug treatments (F3,21 = 5.4, p < 0.01).

 

Mean arterial blood pressure remained stable over the course of the whole experiment and did not differ between groups (vehicle, 126 ± 3; chloroquine, 130 ± 4; paracetamol, 129 ± 3; chloroquine/paracetamol, 125 ± 2 mm Hg).

There were no differences in glomerular filtration rate (Fig. 2; ANOVA 1st h, F3,23 = 0.49, p = 0.69), sodium excretion rate (Fig. 3; F3,23 = 1.73, p = 0.19) nor urine osmolality (Fig. 4; F3,23 = 0.25, p = 0.86) during the initial postequilibration control hour between the four groups. Thus, for ease of comparison, in subsequent graphs the mean values are presented for the control, postequilibration hour (1st h), the hour of drug treatment (2nd h), and the recovery hour (3rd h).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. GFR in rats infused with either vehicle (n = 6), chloroquine (n = 6), paracetamol (n = 6), or paracetamol and chloroquine (n = 6). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis across all groups and time points was by one-way ANOVA (F11,71 = 6.14, p < 0.001) and SNK test. Statistical differences from the vehicle-infused group are shown as *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001; and between chloroquine and paracetamol/chloroquine as +, p < 0.05 within each hour of the experiment.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Urinary sodium excretion in rats infused with either vehicle (n = 6), chloroquine (n = 6), paracetamol (n = 6), or paracetamol and chloroquine (n = 6). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis across all groups and time points was by one-way ANOVA (F11,71 = 25.4, p < 0.001) and SNK test. Statistical differences from the vehicle-infused group are shown as *, p < 0.05 and ***, p < 0.001; and between chloroquine and paracetamol/chloroquine as +++, p < 0.001 within each hour of the experiment.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Urine osmolality in rats infused with either vehicle (n = 6), chloroquine (n = 6), paracetamol (n = 6), or paracetamol and chloroquine (n = 6). Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis across all groups and time points was by one-way ANOVA (F11,71 = 8.25, p < 0.001) and Student-Newman-Keuls test. Statistical differences from the vehicle infused group are shown as *, p < 0.05 and between chloroquine and paracetamol/chloroquine as ++, p < 0.01 within each hour of the experiment.

 

Glomerular Filtration Rate. Chloroquine infusion resulted in a significant increase in GFR by comparison with vehicle-infused rats (Fig. 2) over both the 2nd h (ANOVA 2nd h, F3,23 = 7.55, p = 0.001; post hoc SNK test vehicle versus chloroquine p < 0.01) and the 3rd, recovery hour (ANOVA 3rd hour, F3,23 = 8.48, p = 0.001; vehicle versus chloroquine p < 0.001). Paracetamol alone had no effect on GFR. When chloroquine and paracetamol were coinfused, GFR remained at a rate comparable with vehicle-infused rats over the 2nd hour (chloroquine versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05). There was an increase in GFR over the 3rd hour (vehicle versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05), but not to the same extent as that seen with chloroquine alone (chloroquine versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05).

Sodium Excretion. Urinary sodium excretion is depicted in Fig. 3. Chloroquine infusion resulted in a marked increase in sodium excretion by comparison with the vehicle group over both hours (ANOVA 2nd h, F3,23 = 18.3, p < 0.001, post hoc SNK test vehicle versus chloroquine p < 0.001; ANOVA 3rd h, F3,23 = 47.1, p < 0.001; vehicle versus chloroquine p < 0.001). In contrast, paracetamol infusion resulted in a significant fall in urinary sodium output compared with vehicle infused rats over both the 2nd (vehicle versus paracetamol p < 0.05) and 3rd h (p < 0.05). When chloroquine and paracetamol were coinfused, the sodium excretion rate was comparable with that seen with paracetamol alone. For both hours, the sodium excretion rate of rats receiving a combination of chloroquine and paracetamol was significantly lower than that of vehicle-infused rats (2nd and 3rd h, vehicle versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05) and chloroquine-infused rats (2nd and 3rd h, chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05).

Urine Osmolality. Urine osmolality is shown in Fig. 4 as an indication of urine-concentrating ability. There was a significant (F2,15 = 31.5, p < 0.001) decline in urine osmolality over time in vehicle-treated animals reflecting the concomitant increase in urine flow rate (Fig. 1) and lack of sodium load in the infusate. Despite this decrease in vehicle-treated rats over time, the urine osmolality of rats infused with chloroquine was significantly lower than that of vehicle infused rats over both the 2nd (vehicle versus chloroquine p < 0.05) and 3rd h (p < 0.05). Paracetamol infusion did not alter urine osmolality compared with vehicle-treated rats. However, when chloroquine and paracetamol were coinfused, urine osmolality was significantly higher than that of vehicle-infused and chloroquine-infused rats over both hours (2nd h vehicle versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05, chloroquine versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.01; 3rd h vehicle versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05, chloroquine versus chloroquine/paracetamol p < 0.05).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study confirms our previous report that chloroquine has a natriuretic and diuretic effect in the anesthetized, euvolemic rat (Ahmed et al., 2003aGo) and extends our observations of the effects of paracetamol on renal excretion of salt and water (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). It also demonstrates that the modifying effect of paracetamol on chloroquine's renal actions depends on the length of prior exposure to paracetamol.

In our previous study (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo) we reported that paracetamol administration at 500 mg kg1 b.wt. day1 for 30 days induced a subclinical level of analgesic nephropathy that was typified by a reduction in GFR, sodium excretion, and urine osmolality coupled with a somewhat higher urine flow rate. In the present study, paracetamol was administered to previously untreated rats to assess its short-term actions on renal function in undamaged kidneys. The infusion was maintained over 2 h because the half-life of paracetamol after intravenous administration has been shown to be <30 min (Prescott, 1980Go; Schlondorff, 1993Go). Under these conditions, paracetamol infusion was associated with only a modest reduction in GFR, a significant fall in sodium excretion, and no change in urine osmolality or urine flow rate by comparison with vehicle-infused control rats. The most notable difference between the two treatment regimes was in urine osmolality [acute paracetamol (this study), n = 6, 334.0 ± 34.5 versus chronic paracetamol (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo), n = 6, 135.4 ± 10.8 mOsM kg H2O1, p < 0.01], indicating that rats receiving paracetamol for 30 days had impaired urine concentrating ability, which is a typical feature of analgesic nephropathy (Henrich, 1998Go).

Paracetamol is a rapid, reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (Hardman et al., 2001Go). It has been shown to decrease both renal blood flow and GFR in the dog in vivo (Colletti et al., 1999Go) and to decrease GFR in the isolated perfused rat kidney (Trumper et al., 1998Go). Hence, the modest reduction in GFR with paracetamol observed over the 2nd hour of the present study is in accord with the previously reported actions of paracetamol. Chronic paracetamol treatment resulted in a marked reduction in GFR (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo), presumably reflecting greater or more sustained influence of paracetamol on renal function.

There were also differences in the urine flow rate between the two studies. Urine flow in rats receiving chronic paracetamol was double that of control, untreated rats (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo), whereas in the current study, urine flow after acute paracetamol was not significantly different from that of vehicle-infused rats. This probably reflects the influence of papillary damage and a reduction in urinary concentrating ability after long-term paracetamol administration. Indeed, short-term infusion of paracetamol might be expected to result in a reduction in urine flow rate because acute administration of NSAIDs is associated with an elevation in vasopressin secretion (Wilkinson and Kasting, 1993Go; Walker et al., 1994Go). Although we did not measure plasma vasopressin in this study, it is likely that urine output after acute paracetamol infusion was moderated by an increase in circulating vasopressin concentration.

One possible explanation for the antinatriuretic effect of acute and chronic (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo) paracetamol administration is the inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis. Prostaglandin E2 infusion has been shown to increase sodium excretion (Villa et al., 1997Go) and inhibit active transport of NaCl in the thick ascending limb and cortical collecting duct of isolated perfused nephrons (Stokes, 1979Go; Kokko, 1981Go). The threshold dose of paracetamol required to inhibit sodium excretion is also the same as that which inhibits prostaglandin synthesis (Feldman et al., 1978Go). Thus, in both studies it is possible that paracetamol may have altered renal tubular sodium handling by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. However, in future studies measurements of renal prostaglandin excretion are required to confirm this suggestion.

The renal effects of coadministered paracetamol and chloroquine depend, in part, on alterations in their pharmacokinetics when the two drugs are infused at the same time. Chloroquine and paracetamol are both metabolized through the P450 pathway by the liver (Raucy et al., 1989Go; Lancaster et al., 1990Go) and thus the presence of one drug can affect the clearance rate of the other. Hence, prior paracetamol treatment has been shown to increase the maximum serum concentration of chloroquine after a single oral dose in humans and also increased the area under the chloroquine concentration curve (Raina et al., 1993Go). In the converse situation, when paracetamol was administered to volunteers already treated with chloroquine, chloroquine increased the maximal plasma paracetamol concentration achieved (Adjepon-Yamoah et al., 1986Go).

In the current study, coadministration of paracetamol with chloroquine completely blocked the increase in urine flow rate seen with chloroquine administration alone. A similar pattern of response was observed when chloroquine was infused into rats after chronic paracetamol treatment (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). This suggests that the influence of paracetamol on chloroquine-mediated diuresis may arise through a mechanism other than long-term damage to the renal concentrating mechanism. We have previously suggested that chloroquine stimulates a diuresis in anesthetized, euvolemic rats by a combination of nitric oxide-induced cGMP generation and prostaglandin synthesis (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). Together, these could act to inhibit the increase in medullary collecting duct cAMP generation that is expected to arise after a chloroquine-induced increase in plasma vasopressin concentration (Musabayane et al., 1996Go; Ahmed et al., 2003aGo). However, in the presence of paracetamol, a combination of higher circulating vasopressin levels (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo) and a predicted decreased in prostaglandin synthesis may allow sufficient cAMP generation to activate aquaporin 2 insertion and facilitate water reabsorption in the collecting duct. Again, further study is required to establish the role of renal prostaglandins in this suggested mechanism.

Combined infusion of paracetamol and chloroquine attenuated, but did not completely abolish, the marked increase in GFR observed after infusion of chloroquine alone. A similar response was observed after infusion of chloroquine into rats after chronic paracetamol treatment (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). Chloroquine seems to induce renal nitric oxide synthesis (Ahmed et al., 2003aGo,bGo). Nitric oxide activates both constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenase, resulting in an increase in vasodilatory prostaglandins (Salvemini et al., 1993Go). Thus, together, nitric oxide and prostaglandins might be expected to cause vasodilatation and an increase in GFR. If paracetamol inhibits cyclooxygenase (Hardman et al., 2001Go), this vasodilatory tone will be diminished, resulting in an attenuated GFR response to chloroquine.

The inhibitory effect of acute paracetamol and chloroquine infusion on sodium excretion differed from the natriuresis observed after chloroquine infusion after chronic paracetamol treatment (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). This does not seem to arise through differences in the filtered load of sodium, because GFR was comparable in the two experimental groups. Rather, this probably reflects the loss of urinary concentrating ability typical of analgesic nephropathy after chronic NSAID administration. Against such a background, the natriuretic effect of chloroquine-induced nitric oxide dominates by inhibiting proximal tubule sodium reabsorption (Eitle et al., 1998Go). When chloroquine is coinfused with paracetamol in an animal with a fully functional kidney, the increased delivery of sodium from the proximal tubule to the distal nephron seems to be completely reabsorbed. The site of action is not clear from these data, but could involve the thick ascending limb, because prostaglandin E2 inhibits sodium reabsorption in this segment (Kaojarern et al., 1983Go), or it may reflect a change in tubuloglomerular balance.

In summary, acute paracetamol administration reduced renal sodium excretion, but had no effect on urine flow rate, GFR, or urine osmolality. This contrasts with our previous observations of the effects of chronic paracetamol treatment, which was associated with a reduction in GFR, sodium excretion, and urine osmolality and a tendency toward higher urine output (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). These differences reflect renal responses that may be mediated, at least in part, by prostaglandins or other humoral factors, and hence can occur after both acute and long-term paracetamol treatment, and those that arise as a result of damage to the renal concentrating mechanism and only occur after long-term paracetamol treatment. Modification of chloroquine-induced changes in renal function could also reflect mechanisms involving prostaglandin inhibition or urine concentration deficit. Hence, when coadministered with chloroquine, acute paracetamol infusion inhibited the diuretic and natriuretic effects of chloroquine and restored GFR to levels comparable with the vehicle-infused controls. Chronic paracetamol treatment was similarly effective in blocking the increase in GFR and diuresis associated with chloroquine infusion, but failed to inhibit the natriuresis (Ahmed et al., 2003bGo). These data suggest that the effects of paracetamol on basal and chloroquine-mediated renal function depend on the length of prior exposure to the drug and thus the presence or absence of analgesic nephropathy.


    Footnotes
 
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.051037.

ABBREVIATIONS: GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; ANOVA, analysis of variance; SNK, Student-Newman-Keuls.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Nick Ashton, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, G38 Stopford Bldg., Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: nick.ashton{at}man.ac.uk


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Adjepon-Yamoah KK, Woolhouse NM, and Prescott LF (1986) The effect of chloroquine on paracetamol disposition and kinetics. Br J Clin Pharmacol 21: 322–324.[Medline]

Ahmed MH, Ashton N, and Balment RJ (2003a) The effect of chloroquine on renal function and vasopressin secretion: a nitric oxide-dependent effect. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304: 156–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ahmed MH, Ashton N, and Balment RJ (2003b) Renal function in a rat model of analgesic nephropathy: effect of chloroquine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305: 123–130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blantz RC (1996) Acetaminophen: acute and chronic effects on renal function. Am J Kidney Dis 28: S3–S6.[Medline]

Burgess WJ, Shalmi M, Petersen JS, Plange-Rhule J, Balment RJ, and Atherton JC (1993) A novel computer-driven, servo-controlled fluid replacement technique and its application to renal function studies in conscious rats. Clin Sci 85: 129–137.[Medline]

Chada N (1998) Adding methionine to every paracetamol tablet. Drugs as important as paracetamol in developing countries should not be tainted. Br Med J 316: 474.

Colletti AE, Vogl HW, Rahe T, and Zambraski EJ (1999) Effects of acetaminophen and ibuprofen on renal function in anesthetized normal and sodium-depleted dogs. J Appl Physiol 86: 592–597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ducharme J and Farinotti R (1996) Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of chloroquine. Focus on recent advancements. Clin Pharmacokinet 31: 257–274.[Medline]

Eddleston M (2000) Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world. Q J Med 93: 715–731.

Eitle E, Hiranyachattada S, Wang H, and Harris PJ (1998) Inhibition of proximal tubular fluid absorption by nitric oxide and atrial natriuretic peptide in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 274: C1075–C1080.

Feldman D, Loose DS, and Tan SY (1978) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cause sodium and water retention in the rat. Am J Physiol 234: F490–F496.

Hardman JG, Limbird LE, and Goodman Gilman A eds (2001) Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

Henrich WL (1998) Analgesic nephropathy. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 109: 147–158; discussion 158–149.[Medline]

Jang SH, Lee MH, and Lee MG (1994) Pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen after intravenous and oral administration to spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive Wistar rats. J Pharm Sci 83: 810–814.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaojarern S, Chennavasin P, Anderson S, and Brater DC (1983) Nephron site of effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on solute excretion in humans. Am J Physiol 244: F134–F139.

Kokko JP (1981) Effect of prostaglandins on renal epithelial electrolyte transport. Kidney Int 19: 791–796.[Medline]

Lancaster DL, Adio RA, Tai KK, Simooya OO, Broadhead GD, Tucker GT, and Lennard MS (1990) Inhibition of metoprolol metabolism by chloroquine and other antimalarial drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol 42: 267–271.[Medline]

Musabayane CT, Ndhlovu CE, and Balment RJ (1994) The effects of oral chloroquine administration on kidney function. Ren Fail 16: 221–228.[Medline]

Musabayane CT, Windle RJ, Forsling ML, and Balment RJ (1996) Arginine vasopressin mediates the chloroquine induced increase in renal sodium excretion. Trop Med Int Health 1: 542–550.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nanra RS, Chirawong P, and Kincaid-Smith P (1973) Medullary ischaemia in experimental analgesic nephropathy-the pathogenesis of renal papillary necrosis. Aust NZ J Med 3: 580–586.[Medline]

Prescott LF (1980) Kinetics and metabolism of paracetamol and phenacetin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 10 (Suppl 2): 291S–298S.

Prescott LF, Speirs GC, Critchley JA, Temple RM, and Winney RJ (1989) Paracetamol disposition and metabolite kinetics in patients with chronic renal failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36: 291–297.[CrossRef][Medline]

Raina RK, Bano G, Amla V, Kapoor V, and Gupta KL (1993) The effect of aspirin, paracetamol and analgin on pharmacokinetics of chloroquine. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 37: 229–231.[Medline]

Raucy JL, Lasker JM, Lieber CS, and Black M (1989) Acetaminophen activation by human liver cytochromes P450IIE1 and P450IA2. Arch Biochem Biophys 271: 270–283.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salvemini D, Misko TP, Masferrer JL, Seibert K, Currie MG, and Needleman P (1993) Nitric oxide activates cyclooxygenase enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 7240–7244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schlondorff D (1993) Renal complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Kidney Int 44: 643–653.[Medline]

Sharma A and Mishra NC (1999) Inhibition of a protein tyrosine kinase activity in Plasmodium falciparum by chloroquine. Indian J Biochem Biophys 36: 299–304.[Medline]

Stokes JB (1979) Effect of prostaglandin E2 on chloride transport across the rabbit thick ascending limb of Henle. Selective inhibitions of the medullary portion. J Clin Investig 64: 495–502.

Trumper L, Monasterolo LA, and Elias MM (1998) Probenecid protects against in vivo acetaminophen-induced nephrotoxicity in male Wistar rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 284: 606–610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Villa E, Garcia-Robles R, Haas J, and Romero JC (1997) Comparative effect of PGE2 and PGI2 on renal function. Hypertension 30: 664–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walker MP, Moore TR, and Brace RA (1994) Indomethacin and arginine vasopressin interaction in the fetal kidney: a mechanism of oliguria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171: 1234–1241.[Medline]

Wilkinson MF and Kasting NW (1993) Vasopressin release within the ventral septal area of the rat brain during drug-induced antipyresis. Am J Physiol 264: R1133–R1138.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.051037v1
306/2/478    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmed, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, N.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition