JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on January 21, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.042606


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.102.042606v1
305/1/48    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gwag, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gwag, B. J.

Vol. 305, Issue 1, 48-56, April 2003


The Novel Neuroprotective Action of Sulfasalazine through Blockade of NMDA Receptors

Bo Rum Ryu, Young Ae Lee, Seok Joon Won, Ji-Hyun Noh, Su-Youne Chang, Jun-Mo Chung, Jun Sub Choi, Choun Ki Joo, Sung Hwa Yoon and Byoung Joo Gwag

Departments of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Center for the Interventional Therapy of Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease (CITSAD), Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, Korea (B.R.R., Y.A.L., S.J.W., B.J.G.); Department of Life Sciences and Center for Cell Signaling Research (CCSR), Ewha Womans University, Daehyun-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, Korea (J.-H.N., S.-Y.C., J.-M.C.); Laboratory of Opthalomology and Visual Science, Catholic University, Research Institute of Medical Science, Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea (J.S.C., C.K.J.); and Department of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, Korea (S.H.Y.).

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Sulfasalazine is widely used to treat inflammatory diseases. Besides anti-inflammatory actions such as blockade of nuclear factor-kappa B and cyclooxygenases, we found that 30 to 1000 µM sulfasalazine dose dependently blocked N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity without intervening kainate or alpha -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid neurotoxicity. The neuroprotective effects of sulfasalazine were attributable to prevention of Ca2+ influx and accumulation through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors as a low-affinity antagonist. The systemic administration of sulfasalazine reduced neuronal death following transient cerebral and retinal ischemia in adult rat. The present findings suggest that the neuroprotective action of sulfasalazine can be therapeutically applied to halt devastating neuronal death following hypoxic ischemia, trauma, and neurodegenerative diseases.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammatory processes play a role in degeneration of neuronal cells in acute and chronic neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the inducible enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is up-regulated in ischemic brain areas following focal cerebral ischemia and global forebrain ischemia (Planas et al., 1995; Nakayama et al., 1998), which converts arachidonic acid into the proinflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins. Selective inhibitors and genetic knockout of COX-2 reduce ischemic neuronal death (Sasaki et al., 1988; Iadecola et al., 2001). Increased expression of COX-2 is observed in Alzheimer's disease and traumatized brain and spinal cord and probably contributes to progress of diseases (Oka and Takashima, 1997; Resnick et al., 1998; Dash et al., 2000).

The transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) regulates expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor and interleukins, cell adhesion molecules, and the inducible enzymes such as nitric oxide synthase, COXs, and manganese superoxide dismutase (Baeuerle and Baltimore, 1996; O'Neill and Kaltschmidt, 1997) and modulates degeneration of neurons and non-neuronal cells (Beg and Baltimore, 1996; Scatena et al., 1998). Activation of NF-kappa B is observed in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons of patients with Alzheimer's disease and in vulnerable brain areas after ischemic injury (Boissiere et al., 1997; Clemens et al., 1997; Stephenson et al., 2000). Activation of NF-kappa B mediates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated neuronal death but can protect neurons from oxidative stress and apoptosis (Mattson et al., 1997; Taglialatela et al., 1997; Qin et al., 1998; Won et al., 1999).

Acetylsalicylate (aspirin), an inhibitor of COXs and NF-kappa B, holds multiple therapeutic effects, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects (Kopp and Ghosh, 1994; Vane and Botting, 1998). Aspirin reduces platelet aggregation and the risk of recurrent stroke (Diez-Tejedor et al., 1995). Acetyl salicylate also attenuates ischemic neuronal death, cognitive deficiency in Alzheimer's disease, and motor deficits in the transgenic mouse of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Rich et al., 1995; Barneoud and Curet, 1999; Khayyam et al., 1999). Aspirin appears to exert its neuroprotective effects by preventing activation of NF-kappa B and c-jun N-terminal kinase, voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, and free radical production (Grilli et al., 1996; Aubin et al., 1998; Ko et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2001). Aspirin prevents NMDA neurotoxicity without preventing NMDA-induced accumulation of intracellular Ca2+ (Grilli et al., 1996). Nevertheless, the neuroprotective effects of aspirin at higher doses (>3 mM) limit its therapeutic potential to prevent neuronal death in brain diseases.

Sulfasalazine, a conjugate of 5-aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine, inhibits activity of COXs and NF-kappa B and has been widely used as an anti-inflammatory drug to treat rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (Svartz, 1942; Wahl et al., 1998). Interestingly, we found that sulfasalazine prevented NMDA-induced neuronal death at the therapeutic doses needed to treat inflammatory diseases. Complete blockade of NMDA-induced neuronal death by sulfasalazine raises the possibility that sulfasalazine protects neurons through a novel mechanism irrespective of anti-inflammatory effects. We set out experiments to delineate how sulfasalazine prevents NMDA-induced neuronal death and to examine if sulfasalazine prevents hypoxic ischemic brain injury in animal models.

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Materials

L-Buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO), ferrous chloride, cytosine arabinofuranoside, and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). alpha -Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), kainate, NMDA, and SKF38393 were obtained from Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA). Trolox was obtained from Aldrich Chemical (Milwaukee, WI). Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCDHF), dihydroethidium, Fura-2 AM, and Pluronic F-127 were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). MnTBAP was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA).

Methods

Mouse Cortical Cell Cultures. Cortical cells were obtained from brains of fetal ICR mice at a 14- to 15-day gestation and plated on a 24-well plate (approximately 105 cells/well) precoated with 100 µg/ml poly-D-lysine and 4 µg/ml laminin in a plating medium containing Eagle's minimal essential medium (with Earle's salts) supplemented with 21 mM glucose, 5% fetal bovine serum, 5% horse serum, and 2 mM glutamine (Gwag et al., 1995). Animal care and treatment were in compliance with a protocol approved by our institutional animal care committee. For cocultures of neurons and glia, 10 µM cytosine arabinofuranoside was included to cultures at 7 to 9 days in vitro (DIV), when glial cells were confluent underneath neurons. Cultures were fed with plating medium without fetal bovine serum twice a week. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Neurotoxicity Experiment. Experiments were performed in cortical cell cultures (DIV 12 to 14). For NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity, cultures were exposed to NMDA for 10 min in HEPES controlled salt solution (HCSS buffer) containing 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.6 mM MgCl2, 2.3 mM CaCl2, 15 mM glucose, 20 mM HEPES, and 10 mM NaOH. For non-NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity or free radical injury, cultures were continuously exposed to AMPA, kainate, Fe2+, or BSO in minimal essential medium supplemented with 21 mM glucose. Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring levels of LDH released into bathing medium and scaled to the mean LDH value released 24 h after continuous exposure to 500 µM NMDA (=100%) or a sham wash (=0%).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay. Cells were harvested, resuspended in a hypotonic buffer, incubated with 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min (Ko et al., 1998). Crude nuclear proteins were reacted with a double-stranded oligonucleotides (Genosys, The Wood-lands, TX) containing the NF-kappa B binding sequence from the murine kappa -immunoglobin light-chain gene enhancer, 5'-GGGAGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGG-3' end-labeled with 32P using a Klenow fragment in a buffer containing 8.5 mM EDTA, 8.5 mM EGTA, 8% glycerol, 50 µg/ml poly(dI-dC), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.3 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 6 mM MgCl2. The reaction mixture was resolved on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. The DNA binding activity of NF-kappa B was detected by exposing the gel to the X-ray film.

Measurement of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Activity of COXs was analyzed by measuring levels of PGE2 according to the manufacturer's manual (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI). In brief, cortical cell cultures were pretreated with 30 µM arachidonic acid for 1 h and exposed to target drugs. Supernatants were collected immediately after drug treatment and used to determine the amount of accumulated PGE2 by enzyme-linked immunoassay.

Measurement of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species ([ROS]i) and [Ca2+]i. For analysis of [ROS]i, cortical cell cultures grown on a glass bottom dish were incubated in 2% Pluronic F-127 plus 10 µM 6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, DCDHF, or 5 µM dihydroethidium in HCSS buffer for 20 min at 37°C. For analysis of [Ca2+]i, cortical cell cultures were incubated in 2% Pluronic F-127 plus 5 µM Fura-2 AM in HCSS buffer for 30 min at room temperature (Seo et al., 1999). The fluorescence signal of 6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (Ex = 490 nm; Em = 510: the oxidation product of DCDHF by reactive oxygen species), ethidium (Ex = 518 nm; Em = 605 nm: the oxidation product of dihydroethidium by superoxide), and Fura-2 (Ex = 340/380 nm; Em = 510 nm) was acquired with a Nikon Diaphot inverted microscope equipped with a 100-W Xenon lamp and a Nikon 20×, 0.4 N.A. objective. The fluorescence signals were analyzed using a QuantiCell 700 system (Applied Imaging, Newcastle, England).

Uptake of 45Ca2+. Uptake of 45Ca2+ was performed as described before (Hartley et al., 1993). Cortical cell cultures were treated with drugs in HCSS buffer containing 1 µCi/ml 45Ca2+ for 10 min. Cultures were then washed three times with HCSS and dissolved in 400 µl of 0.2% SDS. Radioactivity of 45Ca2+ was read in the scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).

Measurement of NMDA---Induced Currents. Whole-cell recordings were performed on cortical cell cultures (DIV 12-14) at room temperature (18-23°C). Whole-cell currents recorded with an Axopatch 100A amplifier were filtered at 2 to 5 KHz, digitized, and stored using an analog-to-digital interface and software (Digidata 1300 and pClamp 6.0; Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Electrode seal resistances ranged from 2 to 3 MOmega when filled with the internal solution consisting of 135 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM ATP-Na2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, and 11 mM EGTA (pH 7.3). The external solution contained 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 25 mM D-glucose, 10 mM HEPES, and 0.01 mM glycine (pH 7.4). Leak and capacitive currents were subtracted on-line from active responses using a P/4 protocol (Bezanilla and Armstrong, 1977). Drugs were applied by a gravity-driven rapid perfusion system (Yellen, 1982).

Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (i.p., 400 mg/kg). The rectal temperature was recorded and maintained at 37°C with a homeothermic blanket. The right middle cerebral artery was exposed, ligated, and both common carotid arteries then occluded using aneurysm clips (Tamura et al., 1981). The ischemic injury was terminated by removing the aneurysm clips. Immediately after occlusion of common carotid arteries, animals received sulfasalazine solved in phosphate-buffered saline at high doses (60 mg/kg) for the first 2 h and low doses (240 mg/kg) for the next 22 h into femoral vein through infusion pump (Harvard Apparatus, Inc., South Natick, MA). To analyze infarct volume, rats were euthanized by chloral hydrate 24 h after reperfusion, sectioned coronally into six slices (2 mm thick) in a rodent brain matrix (Harvard Instruments, Inc.), and placed in 2% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride at 37°C for 30 min. The images of brain sections were captured by an image analyzing system (BioRad, Hercules, CA), and hemispheric infarct volume was determined by summation of infarct volumes measured in each brain slice using TINA 2.0 (KAIST, Daejeon, Korea).

Retinal Ischemia. Male rats (Sprague-Dawley, 180-200 g) were anesthetized with chloral hydrate. The intraocular pressure was increased to 160 to 180 mm Hg for 90 min by inserting a 30.5-gauge needle into the anterior chamber. Sulfasalazine or vehicle was injected into the eye through a Hamilton syringe inserted into the vitreous chamber 15 min before the ischemic injury. Rats were euthanized 24 h after reperfusion. Eyes were removed, fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde, sectioned at 1 mm of thickness, and stained with 1% Toluidine blue. Neuronal death in the retina was analyzed by counting viable neurons in 100 × 25-µm squares underlying the ganglion cell layer and inner nuclear cell layer (Joo et al., 1999).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Neuroprotective Effects of Sulfasalazine against NMDA Receptor-Mediated Excitotoxicity in Cortical Cell Cultures. We first examined effects of sulfasalazine against excitotoxicity in primary cortical cell cultures. Cortical neurons exposed to 300 µM NMDA revealed marked swelling of cell body within 30 min. Administration of 1 mM sulfasalazine completely blocked the NMDA-induced morphological change (Fig. 1A). The neuroprotective effect of 300 µM to 1 mM sulfasalazine was not reversed by increasing doses of NMDA up to 1 mM, suggesting a noncompetitive mode of inhibition (Fig. 1B). A 10-min exposure to 300 µM NMDA produced approximately 80% neuronal death 24 h later that was completely blocked by concurrent treatment with 1 mM sulfasalazine as well as 3 µM MK-801 (Fig. 1C). The neuroprotective effects of sulfasalazine against 300 µM NMDA were apparent at concentrations as low as 300 µM, whereas aspirin prevented NMDA neurotoxicity at a dose of 10 mM (Fig. 1D). The neuroprotective concentrations of sulfasalazine were comparable to the amounts in serum after oral ingestion of 4- to 12-g dose in humans (Schroder and Campbell, 1972; Reynolds, 1996). We performed additional experiments to determine whether sulfasalazine would interfere with non-NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. Continuous exposure to 50 µM kainate or 20 µM AMPA produced 50 to 60% neuronal death 24 h later (Fig. 1E). Concurrent administration of sulfasalazine did not reduce kainate- or AMPA-induced neuronal death.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Sulfasalazine protects cortical neurons from NMDA neurotoxicity. A, phase contrast photomicrographs of cortical cell cultures 30 min after 10-min exposure to 300 µM NMDA, alone (a1) or with 1 mM sulfasalazine (a2). Bar denotes 30 µm. Arrows indicate the swollen neurons. B, cortical cell cultures were exposed to the indicated doses of NMDA for 10 min, alone (filled circles) or in the presence of 300 µM (filled triangles) or 1 mM (open circles) sulfasalazine. Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8-16 culture wells/condition), scaled to the mean LDH value corresponding to complete neuronal death induced by continuous exposure to 500 µM NMDA. C, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone (open triangle) or with the indicated doses of MK-801 (filled circles) or sulfasalazine (open circles). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3-34 culture wells/condition), scaled to the mean LDH value corresponding to complete neuronal death induced by continuous exposure to 500 µM NMDA. D, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone (open triangle) or with the indicated doses of aspirin (open circles) or sulfasalazine (filled circles). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8-24 culture wells/condition), scaled to the mean LDH value corresponding to complete neuronal death induced by continuous exposure to 500 µM NMDA. E, cortical cell cultures were exposed continuously to 50 µM kainate (filled circles) or 20 µM AMPA (open circles), alone or with the indicated doses of sulfasalazine (SUL). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing media, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8 culture wells/condition). *, significant difference from relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test.

Neither NF-kappa B nor COXs Mediates the Neuroprotective Effect of Sulfasalazine. We examined the possibility that NF-kappa B would mediate the neuroprotective actions of sulfasalazine against NMDA. Nuclear extracts from sham-operated cortical cell cultures showed slight NF-kappa B DNA binding activity. Administration of NMDA increased the DNA binding activity of NF-kappa B within 10 min, as previously reported (Ko et al., 1998). Inclusion of 300 µM sulfasalazine or 1-pyrrolidinecarbodithioic acid (PDTC), a selective inhibitor of NF-kappa B, blocked NMDA-induced activation of NF-kappa B (Fig. 2A). In contrast to the protective effect of sulfasalazine, PDTC did not reduce NMDA-induced neuronal death (Fig. 2B). Thus, sulfasalazine appears to prevent NMDA neurotoxicity through NF-kappa B-independent mechanisms.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   NF-kappa B does not mediate the neuroprotective effect of sulfasalazine. A, an autoradiogram showing DNA binding activity of NF-kappa B from nuclear extracts that were obtained from cortical cell cultures exposed to a sham wash (sham) or 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone (NMDA) or in the presence of 300 µM sulfasalazine (+SUL) or 1 mM PDTC (+PDTC). B, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone or in the presence of sulfasalazine (SUL; 300 µM or 1000 µM) or PDTC (100 µM or 1000 µM). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8 culture wells/condition). *, significant difference from relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test.

We next investigated COXs as a putative target for the neuroprotective effects of sulfasalazine against NMDA toxicity. As previously reported (Hewett et al., 2000), a brief exposure of cortical cell cultures to 300 µM NMDA increased activity of COXs within 2 h (Fig. 3A). Inclusion of 300 µM to 1 mM sulfasalazine or 100 µM NS398, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, prevented NMDA-induced activation of COXs. Nevertheless, none of COX inhibitors except sulfasalazine prevented NMDA-induced neuronal death (Fig. 3B). Thus, sulfasalazine appears to prevent NMDA neurotoxicity irrespective of its anti-inflammatory actions, inhibition of COX-2 as well as NF-kappa B.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   COXs do not mediate the neuroprotective action of sulfasalazine against NMDA. A, cortical cell cultures were exposed to sham wash (sham) or 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone or in the presence of sulfasalazine (SUL; 300 µM or 1000 µM) or 100 µM NS398, a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Activity of cyclooxygenases was analyzed 2 h later by measuring PGE2 released into the bathing media, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 2-3 cultures/condition). Similar results were obtained from two separate experiments. *, significant difference from sham control; #, significant difference from NMDA alone at p < 0.05, using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. B, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone or with inclusion of 30 µM or 100 µM indomethacin (Indo), nabumetone (Nabu), or NS398. Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8-40 cultures/condition).

The Antioxidant Property of Sulfasalazine Does Not Mediate the Neuroprotective Effect against NMDA. Sulfasalazine can act as a free radical scavenger (Aruoma et al., 1987), which can contribute to prevention of free radical production and neuronal death following activation of NMDA receptors. Cortical cell cultures exposed to free radical-inducing agents, Fe2+ or BSO, underwent widespread neuronal death that was sensitive to antioxidants such as vitamin E (Gwag et al., 1995; Ryu et al., 1999). Administration of 30 to 100 µM sulfasalazine prevented the oxidative neuronal death (Fig. 4A). Neither aspirin nor salicylate, however, prevented oxidative neuronal death following exposure to Fe2+ or BSO (data not shown), suggesting that the neuroprotective effects against oxidative stress are unique to sulfasalazine compared with other salicylates. Sulfasalazine reduced production of [ROS]i possibly as a direct antioxidant (Fig. 4B). As previously reported (Dugan et al., 1995; Sengpiel et al., 1998), treatment with 300 µM NMDA caused production of superoxide in cortical neurons as determined by oxidation of dihydroethidium to ethidium (Fig. 4, C-D). Addition of Trolox or sulfasalazine blocked NMDA-induced production of superoxide. Except sulfasalazine, neither Trolox nor other antioxidants (N-acetylcystein, SKF38393, or MnTBAP, a cell-permeable superoxide dismutase mimetic) attenuated NMDA neurotoxicity (Fig. 4E). This implies that sulfasalazine should prevent NMDA neurotoxicity via a novel mechanism that differs from anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions. In support of this, a combination of indomethacin, PDTC, and Trolox slightly reduced NMDA neurotoxicity (Fig. 4F). This means that the antagonistic actions of sulfasalazine against NMDA receptors are attributable primarily to blockade of NMDA neurotoxicity.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Antioxidant property of sulfasalazine does not mediate the neuroprotective effect against NMDA. A, cortical cell cultures were continuously exposed to 50 µM Fe2+ (filled circles) or 10 mM BSO (open circles), alone or with inclusion of 3 to 100 µM sulfasalazine (SUL). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4-12 culture wells/condition). *, significant difference from sham control; #, significant difference from the relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. B, cortical cell cultures were exposed or 50 µM Fe2+ for the indicated points of time, alone (filled circles) or with inclusion of 100 µM sulfasalazine (open circles). Levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species in cortical neurons [ROS]i were analyzed by measuring fluorescence intensity of 6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate, the oxidation product of DCDHF-DA, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 53-80 neurons randomly chosen from three culture dishes for each condition). *, significant difference from the relevant control (Fe2+ alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. C, fluorescence photomicrographs of cortical neurons showing ethidium, the oxidation product of dihydroethidium with superoxide, in cortical cell cultures exposed to sham wash (c1), 300 µM NMDA (c2), 300 µM NMDA plus 300 µM sulfasalazine (c3), or 300 µM NMDA plus 100 µM Trolox (c4) for 5 min. D, cortical cell cultures were exposed to sham wash (sham) or 300 µM NMDA, alone or in the presence of 300 µM SUL or 100 µM Trolox (TRO). Sister cultures were exposed to 300 µM sulfasalazine or 100 µM Trolox alone. Levels of superoxide were analyzed 5 min later by measuring fluorescence intensity of ethidium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 40-80 neurons randomly chosen from four culture dishes/condition). *, significant difference from sham control; #, significant difference from the relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. E, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone or with inclusion of 300 µM SUL, 100 µM TRO, 100 µM N-acetylcystein (NAC), 10 µM SKF38393 (SKF), or 10 µM MnTBAP (MTB). Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing media, means ± S.E.M. (n = 10-2 culture wells/condition). *, significant difference from NMDA alone at p < 0.05, using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. F, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA for 10 min, alone or with a combination of 100 µM indomethacin, 100 µM Trolox, and 100 µM PDTC. Neuronal death was analyzed 24 h later by measuring LDH efflux into the bathing medium, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4 culture wells/condition). *, significant difference from NMDA alone at p < 0.05 using Student's t test.

Sulfasalazine Prevents Ca2+ Overload following Activation of NMDA Receptors. Excess activation of NMDA receptors results in massive influx of Ca2+ that causes delayed neuronal death (Choi, 1987). We reasoned that the neuroprotective effect of sulfasalazine against NMDA would involve buffering intracellular Ca2+ overload. Neuronal [Ca2+]i was elevated to a peak level within 20 s after exposure of cortical cell cultures to 300 µM NMDA (Fig. 5A). Inclusion of sulfasalazine prevented NMDA-induced elevation of [Ca2+]i. Sulfasalazine also prevented 45Ca2+ uptake subsequent to activation of NMDA receptors (Fig. 5B). Taken together, the neuroprotective effect of sulfasalazine against NMDA likely stems from prevention of Ca2+ influx and accumulation.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Sulfasalazine blocks NMDA currents. A, cortical cell cultures were exposed to 300 µM NMDA, alone (filled circles) or with inclusion of 300 µM sulfasalazine (open circles) or 1 mM sulfasalazine (filled triangles). [Ca2+]i in cortical neurons was analyzed using Fura-2 at indicated points of time, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 55-94 randomly chosen neurons from four to six dishes/condition), scaled to mean neuronal [Ca2+]i after the sham control (=100%). [Ca2+]i in cortical neurons treated with 300 µM to 1 mM sulfasalazine is significantly different from relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. B, cortical cell cultures were exposed to a sham wash or 300 µM NMDA, alone or in the presence of 30 µM to 1 mM sulfasalazine (SUL). Ca2+ influx was analyzed 10 min later by measuring influx of 45Ca2+ into cortical cells, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 12 cultures/each condition). *, significant difference from relevant control (NMDA alone) at p < 0.05 using ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. C-E, whole-cell currents were elicited from cortical neurons at a holding potential of -60 mV after exposure to 300 µM NMDA. In C, neurons were applied with 300 µM SUL for the indicated times and NMDA-induced peak currents were analyzed, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 7 neurons/each condition). *, significant difference from NMDA currents at p < 0.003 using student's t test (paired). In D, NMDA-induced peak currents were analyzed with inclusion of different doses of SUL, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 neurons/each condition). In E, 300 µM SUL was applied before administration of 300 µM NMDA. F, whole-cell currents were elicited from cortical neurons exposed to 300 µM NMDA, alone or with inclusion of 300 µM SUL for the indicated times, at a holding potential of + 50 mV as well as -60 mV. The inhibitory effect of sulfasalazine was normalized to NMDA-induced currents (=100%), mean ± S.E.M. (n = 5 neurons/each condition). No significant difference between the inhibitory effects of sulfasalazine at + 50 mV and -60 mV using student's t test (paired).

We performed whole-cell recordings to study whether sulfasalazine would reduce NMDA-induced inward currents. Bath application of 300 µM sulfasalazine immediately depressed NMDA-evoked currents in cortical neurons (Fig. 5C). NMDA currents were rapidly recovered after removal of sulfasalazine. Sulfasalazine inhibited NMDA currents in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 value of sulfasalazine for NMDA currents was 294 ± 1.21 µM, and the Hill coefficient was 1.19 (Fig. 5D). Sulfasalazine alone did not influence the holding current, and pretreatment with sulfasalazine did not block the inward current evolving after a subsequent application of NMDA (Fig. 5E). Thus, sulfasalazine appears to act as an open-channel blocker that blocks agonist-activated NMDA receptors. In support of this, a competition binding assay showed that sulfasalazine inhibited binding of [3H]N-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine, a selective ligand of phencyclidine binding sites, without significant effects on NMDA and glycine binding sites in rat cortical homogenates (for inhibition of N-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine: IC50 = 48 µM and Ki = 32.5 µM). It is possible, however, that sulfasalazine may antagonize NMDA receptors through allosteric modulation. Application of NMDA elicited the outward current when cortical neurons were held at 50 mV. Administration of sulfasalazine prevented NMDA-induced outward current (Fig. 5F). Thus, sulfasalazine appears to block NMDA currents in a voltage-independent manner. The voltage-independence and open-channel blockade of NMDA receptors underlies the pharmacological action of MK-801, a typical open-channel blocker (Halliwell et al., 1989).

Sulfasalazine Reduces Ischemic Damage in Vivo. We examined the neuroprotective effect of sulfasalazine in animal models of hypoxic ischemia that would cause neuronal death primarily through excess activation of NMDA receptors (Choi and Rothman, 1990). Approximately 300 mm3 of cerebral infarct was observed 24 h following occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCAO) for 60 min. When sulfasalazine was continuously injected into the femoral vein at the beginning of occlusion, the infarct volume was significantly reduced (Fig. 6A). Sulfasalazine-treated animals did not show significant change in physiologic variables such as mean arterial blood pressure, Pao2, Paco2, pH, and blood glucose during and after ischemia (Table 1). We finally studied the protective effect of sulfasalazine against hypoxic ischemic injury in retina. As previously reported (Joo et al., 1999), increasing intraocular pressure to 160 to 180 mm Hg for 90 min produced retinal ischemia and subsequent neuronal death in the ganglion cell layer and inner nuclear cell layer 24 h later (Fig. 6,B-C). The neuronal death in the retina was significantly reduced by the vitreous injections of sulfasalazine 15 min before ischemic insults, which was comparable to the neuroprotective effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (Joo et al., 1999). Sulfasalazine was more potent than aspirin in reducing ischemic neuronal death in retina (Fig. 6D). Dose-response experiments and assays of inflammatory responses and oxidative stress, however, will be needed for quantitative and qualitative comparison of aspirin and sulfasalazine against ischemic injury.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Sulfasalazine reduces ischemic injury in brain and retina. A, adult rats received transient cerebral ischemia by MCAO for 60 min, with intravenous injections of vehicle (MCAO) or sulfasalazine (+SUL) at the beginning of ischemic injury. The volume of the infarction was analyzed 24 h later after staining brain slices with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 7-8 rats/each condition). *, significant difference from the vehicle (MCAO) control, p < 0.05 using the independent t test. B, bright field photomicrographs of retinal sections stained with Toluidine blue 24 h after retinal ischemia, alone (ischemia) or with injections of 30 nmol of sulfasalazine 15 min before ischemia (+SUL). Note the pyknotic neurons (arrows) and the swelling neurons (asterisks) in ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner nuclear layer (INL) after the ischemic injury that was reduced by administration of sulfasalazine. Bar denotes 50 µm. ONL, outer nuclear layer. C and D, the number of viable cells in GCL (filled bars) and INL (open bars) was counted in 100 × 25-mm square 24 h after retinal ischemia, alone (ischemia) or with injections of indicated doses of sulfasalazine (C) or aspirin (D) 15 min before ischemia, mean ± S.E.M. (n = 15 fields randomly chosen from five rats/condition), scaled to mean value of viable cells after the sham control (=100%). *, significant difference from the vehicle control at p < 0.05, ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Physiologic variables during and after ischemia

Values are the mean ± S.D. (n = 4-7).

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We have found that the anti-inflammatory drug sulfasalazine noncompetitively prevents NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal death at doses of 30 µM to 1 mM irrespective of blockade of NF-kappa B and COXs and antioxidant effect. The neuroprotective actions of sulfasalazine are mediated through blocking NMDA receptors. The novel neuroprotective actions of sulfasalazine are verified in animal models of focal cerebral ischemia and retinal ischemia.

As sulfasalazine contains the acetylsalicylate moiety that prevents NMDA neurotoxicity possibly through blockade of the inflammatory mediators NF-kappa B and COXs, it is conceivable to deduce that the anti-inflammatory action of sulfasalazine is essential for blocking NMDA neurotoxicity. The present study excluded this possibility, however. First, PDTC, the selective inhibitor of NF-kappa B, blocked NMDA-induced NF-kappa B activation but did not protect against NMDA neurotoxicity. Second, administrating an inhibitor of COXs resulted in slight or no protection against NMDA neurotoxicity, although they completely blocked NMDA-induced activation of COXs (Hewett et al., 2000; Iadecola et al., 2001). In contrast to an inhibitor of COXs, sulfasalazine completely blocked NMDA neurotoxicity (Fig. 2). This suggests that blockade of NMDA neurotoxicity by sulfasalazine should involve other mechanisms besides COXs and NF-kappa B.

As previously reported (Dugan et al., 1995; Sengpiel et al., 1998), treatment with 300 µM NMDA caused production of superoxide in cortical neurons, as determined by oxidation of dihydroethidium to ethidium (Fig. 4, C-D). Activation of NMDA receptors results in massive influx and accumulation of ions and accumulation of ROS. We examined the antioxidant property of sulfasalazine as a possible mechanism underlying the neuroprotective effect against NMDA. We observed that sulfasalazine as well as antioxidants prevented pro-oxidant-induced neuronal death and NMDA-induced production of ROS in cortical cell cultures. Antioxidants did not, however, reduce NMDA-induced neuronal death, suggesting that the antioxidant property of sulfasalazine does not mediate the neuroprotective effect against NMDA. Moreover, a combination of indomethacin and PDTC as well as Trolox slightly reduced NMDA neurotoxicity that was completely blocked by sulfasalazine.

As sulfasalazine blocked downstream events such as activation of COXs and NF-kappa B, production of ROS, and swelling of neuronal cell body subsequent to activation of NMDA receptors, we reasoned that NMDA receptors could be the pharmacological target of sulfasalazine. In fact, sulfasalazine prevented NMDA-induced accumulation and influx of intracellular Ca2+. Electrophysiological study demonstrates that sulfasalazine blocks the open state of NMDA receptors in a voltage-independent mode as open channel blockers such as MK-801 and 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)piperidine (phencyclidine) do. Nevertheless, the rapid dissociation from NMDA receptors is a unique property of sulfasalazine. The neuroprotective action of sulfasalazine as a direct NMDA receptor antagonist differs from that of aspirin that is attributable to blockade of NF-kappa B and c-jun N-terminal kinase without reducing NMDA-induced accumulation of intracellular Ca2+ (Grilli et al., 1996; Ko et al., 1998).

Transient and excess activation of NMDA receptors causes fulminant neuronal death and plays a primary role in neuronal death following hypoxic ischemic brain injury. Several NMDA receptor antagonists have been developed and applied to reduce neuronal death in patients with ischemic stroke (Muir and Lees, 1995). The therapeutic efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists has not been verified in the clinical trials of ischemic patients (Davis et al., 1997; Lees, 1997), however. Systemic administration of NMDA receptor antagonists impairs normal brain function and can cause widespread neuronal damage in adult rat brain (Olney et al., 1989). The neuropsychopathological side effects are produced by high-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists and appear to be avoided with channel-blocking NMDA receptor antagonists with low-affinity and rapid-kinetic response (Rogawski, 2000). Sulfasalazine antagonizes NMDA receptors as a low-affinity and rapidly dissociating open channel blocker and can be applied to securely block NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal death following hypoxic ischemic injury. In support of this, administration of sulfasalazine into femoral vein or vitreous does not produce neuronal damage in normal rat brain and retina, whereas it significantly reduces degeneration of cortical and retinal neurons following transient ischemic insults. The neuroprotective effects of sulfasalazine against retinal ischemia were more portent than aspirin.

The antithrombotic action of aspirin is widely used to treat acute ischemic stroke and to reduce the incidence of transient ischemic attack (Hennekens et al., 1988). In addition to the antithrombotic action and antioxidant, sulfasalazine can block NMDA receptors, the major routes of ischemic neuronal death, within the range of therapeutic doses to treat inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. The antithrombotic and multiple neuroprotective actions of sulfasalazine hold a promise for the primary and secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 6, 2003.

Received for publication August 9, 2002.

This work is supported by a National Research Laboratory grant and a G7 grant (08-01-A-07) from the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology (B.J.G.) and the KOSEF grant through the CCSR Research Fund (J.M.C.).

DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.042606

Address correspondence to: Byoung Joo Gwag, Departments of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Center for the Interventional Therapy of Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease (CITSAD), Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, 442-749 Korea. E-mail: bjgwag{at}madang.ajou.ac.kr

    Abbreviations

COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; NF-kappa B, nuclear factor-kappa B; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; BSO, L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine; AMPA, alpha -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; SKF38393, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine; DCDHF, dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; DIV, days in vitro; HCSS buffer, HEPES controlled salt solution; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; [ROS]i, intracellular reactive oxygen species; MK-801, dizocilpine maleate; PDTC, 1-pyrrolidinecarbodithioic acid; NS398, N-[2-(cyclohexyloxyl)-4-nitrophenyl]-methanesulfonamide; MCAO, occlusion of middle cerebral artery; ANOVA, analysis of variance; MnTBAP, meso-tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)porphyrin.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/03/3051-0048-0056$07.00
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.102.042606v1
305/1/48    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gwag, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gwag, B. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition