|
|
|
|
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR
Department of Pharmacology (M.H., Y.W., L.M.G.) and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (S.B.C., B.S.M.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nucleoside analogs that interfere with nucleotide metabolism and DNA
replication are widely used in anticancer or antiviral therapies
(Pastor-Anglada et al., 1998
).
Specifically pyrimidine nucleoside derivatives such as gemcitabine (dFdC) and
cytarabine (Ara-C), pyrimidine derivatives (bromodeoxyuridine and
iododeoxyuridine), and the purine derivatives cladribine (CdA) and fludarabine
(F-ara-A) are currently used as chemotherapeutic agents
(Pastor-Anglada et al., 1998
;
Galmarini et al., 2001
). The
clinical efficacy of these compounds is highly dependent on the rates of
uptake across the plasma membrane, which is mediated by specific nucleoside
transporters (Pastor-Anglada et al.,
1998
).
The recent cloning of the genes for the nucleoside transporters has
resulted in the identification of many of the specific transporters
responsible for these events
(Pastor-Anglada et al., 2001
).
The concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs) transport nucleosides and
nucleoside analogs in a sodium-dependent manner
(Cass et al., 1999
). However,
the most widely expressed nucleoside transporter subtype in mammalian cells or
tissues is the equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs), which transport
nucleosides in a sodium-independent manner. These transporters can be further
defined by their differential sensitivity (es/ENT1) or insensitivity (ei/ENT2)
to the inhibitor, nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR)
(Cass et al., 1999
). The
es/ENT1 equilibrative transporters are also sensitive to inhibition by the
cardioprotective agents dilazep, draflazine, and dipyridamole
(Baldwin et al., 1999
).
Although the es/ENT1 transporters have a similar affinity for NBMPR,
significant species differences have been observed in the sensitivity of the
es/ENT1 transporters to other structurally diverse inhibitors such as
dipyridamole and draflazine (Hammond,
2000
). The finding that these structurally unrelated inhibitors
show differential affinity for the es/ENT1 transporter from different species
and that dipyridamole is capable of competing the binding of
[3H]NBMPR in a variety of experimental models
(Hammond, 2000
) suggests that
dipyridamole and NBMPR have distinct but overlapping binding sites in the
nucleoside transporters (Hammond,
2000
).
The human erythroleukemia K562 cell line was isolated and characterized
from a patient with chronic myelogeneous leukemia in blast crisis, and
expresses the p210 Bcr-Abl fusion protein
(Ramakrishnan and Rosenberg,
1989
). In this cell line, approximately 80 to 90% of total
nucleoside transport activity occurs by equilibrative NBMPR-sensitive (es)
transport whereas the remainder occurs by an NBMPR-insensitive (ei) transport
process (Boleti et al., 1997
).
Using this cell line as a model system, the effects of p38 MAPK inhibitors on
the equilibrative transport process were previously evaluated
(Huang et al., 2002
).
In our current study, we have investigated a group of structurally distinct PKIs for their effects on nucleoside transport. We report here that a wide number of these compounds inhibit the uptake of both [3H]uridine and [3H]thymidine by specific inhibition of the ENT1 nucleoside transporter. Thus these studies further demonstrate that the equilibrative transporters are targets for the cellular effects of PKIs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-D-arabinofuranoside
([5-3H]Ara-C, 1530 Ci/mmol), and
[methyl-3H]thymidine (20.0 Ci/mmol) were from Moravek
Biochemicals (Brea, CA). Uridine, thymidine, adenosine, and NBMPR
(nitrobenzylthioinosine, 6-[(4-nitrobenzyl)thio]-9-(
-D-ribofuranosyl)
purine) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). SB202474, SB203580,
SB203580-iodo, SB220025, Ro 31-6045, arcyriarubin A, GF 109203X, Ro 31-8220,
Ro 32-0432, staurosporine, AG825, AG18, AG1478, AG1517 (PD153035), WHI-154,
WHI-P97, WHI-180, WHI-P258, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine
kinase inhibitor, AG490, AG1879 (PP2), rapamycin, Raf-1 inhibitor 1, H-89,
KN93, genistein, wortmannin, LY-294002, and ZM336372 were purchased from
Calbiochem-Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA). U0126 and PD 98059 were obtained from
Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). STI-571 was provided by E.
Buchdunger (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland).
Uptake Assays of [3H]Uridine and
[3H]Thymidine. The assays of [3H]uridine uptake were
conducted as described previously in sodium-containing buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl,
3 mM K2HPO4, 1 mM MgCl2 ·
6H2O, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM glucose, and 130 mM NaCl, pH 7.4)
(Huang et al., 2002
). Briefly,
5 x 105 K562 cells/sample were washed once with transport
buffer and then resuspended in 400 µl of transport buffer. After
preincubation with SB analogs, NBMPR, or DMSO for 15 min, uptake assays were
started by adding equal volume of transport buffer containing 10 µM
3H-labeled uridine (4 µCi/ml) or 3H-labeled thymidine
(10 µCi/ml) plus inhibitors or DMSO. Uptake assays were stopped at 60 or 30
s, respectively, by five rapid washes with ice-cold transport buffer
containing 1 mM unlabeled competing uridine or thymidine. The cell pellets
were lysed in 10% SDS before quantification of radioactivity.
Measurement of [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
(Gotoh et al., 2002
). For
[3H]Thymidine incorporation, exponentially growing K562 cells were
plated in 1-ml aliquots of growth medium into 24-well plates at 4 x
104 cells per well, respectively, and then treated with various
PKIs or vehicle DMSO control. After 24 h of treatment,
[3H]thymidine was added at a final concentration of 1 µCi/ml for
an additional 4 h. At harvest, cells were washed twice with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, and precipitated by 5% trichloroacetic acid at
4°C. The pellets were washed with ice-cold 95% ethanol, dried at room
temperature, and then dissolved in 200 µl of 1 M NaOH for 30 min before
quantification of radioactivity. Triplicate wells were analyzed for each
treatment.
Measurement of Cell Proliferation by MTT Assay. The effects of PKI's
on proliferation of K562 cells were determined using the modified MTT assay
method (Carmichael et al.,
1987
). Exponentially growing K562 cells were plated in 1-ml
aliquots of growth medium into 24-well plates at 4 x 104
cells per well, respectively, and then incubated with various PKIs or vehicle
alone. After 24 or 48 h of incubation, cytotoxicity assays were performed by
the modified MTT method. Triplicate wells were analyzed for each
treatment.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Analysis of a number of serine/threonine kinase inhibitors showed that the
broad specificity PKC inhibitor (staurosporine), the Raf1 kinase inhibitor
(Lackey et al., 2000
),
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (roscovitine, olomoucine, and
indirubin-3'-monoxime) (Buolamwini,
2000
), and the target-of-rapamycin (TOR) kinase inhibitor
(rapamycin) also strongly inhibited nucleoside transport
(Fig. 1). Partial inhibition
was observed with the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89, the CAMKII selective
inhibitor KN93, and the Raf kinase inhibitor ZM336372. By contrast, neither
the MEK1 inhibitors (PD 98059, U0126) nor the phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase
inhibitors (wortmannin, LY-294002) significantly inhibited the uptake of
[3H]uridine in these cells when assayed at 10 µM, thus
demonstrating the differential effects of these compounds on nucleoside
transport.
Inhibition of [3H]Uridine Transport by a Related Class of
Protein Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Because our results showed that the
tyrphostin class of protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (PTKs) inhibited
nucleoside transport, we further examined the structure-activity relationship
of these compounds. Specifically, the quinazoline tyrphostin AG1478 and the
corresponding bromo derivative AG1517 (PD 153035), two selective inhibitors of
EGFR kinase activity (Levitzki and Gazit,
1995
), were compared to other dimethoxyquinazoline derivatives for
their inhibitory effects on the uptake of [3H]uridine in K562 cells
(Fig. 2A). As shown in
Fig. 2B, WHI-P154, the
4'-hydroxyphenyl derivative of AG1517 and inhibitor of JAK3 tyrosine
kinase (Sudbeck et al., 1999
),
exhibited similar inhibitory effects on [3H]uridine uptake to that
observed with AG1517 and AG1478. WHI-P258, an inactive analog of the JAK3
inhibitor (Sudbeck et al.,
1999
), the VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor
(Hennequin et al., 1999
), or
WHI-P97 (Sudbeck et al., 1999
)
showed a reduced ability to inhibit nucleoside transport in these cells and
correlated with increasing substitutions on the 4'-phenyl group or the
loss of an electronegative group at the 3' position of this ring.
|
Comparison of AG1517 and AG1478 to the structurally distinct compound AG825 (Fig. 2C) demonstrated that these compounds suppressed [3H]uridine uptake with a similar IC50 0.9, 1.0, and 1.1 µM, respectively (Fig. 2D). By contrast, the other tyrphostins, AG 18 (a broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor), AG490 and AG 1879 (Fig. 2C), were not as effective at inhibiting transport as shown in Fig. 1.
PKC Inhibitors are Potent Inhibitors of Nucleoside Transport. Since
our data in Fig. 1 demonstrated
that the PKC inhibitor staurosporine prevented nucleoside transport
(Fig. 1), we examined a series
of related PKC inhibitors including GF 109203X, Ro 31-8220, and arcyriarubin A
(Fig. 3A). Incubation of K562
cells with these compounds at concentrations from 0.1 to 10 µM induced a
dose-dependent inhibition of [3H]uridine uptake with an
IC50 of 1.7, 0.8, and 1.7 µM, respectively
(Fig. 3B). Interestingly, Ro
32-0432, another derivative of staurosporine and selective inhibitor of PKC
(Birchall et al., 1994
), did
not inhibit nucleoside transport at concentrations up to 10 µM. In
comparison, Ro 31-6045, a staurosporine analog that does not inhibit PKC
(Davis et al., 1992
), showed
the most potent inhibitory effects on [3H]uridine transport with an
IC50 of 0.06 µM suggesting that the effects of these compounds
on nucleoside transport were independent of PKC inhibition.
|
Effects of p38 MAPK Inhibitors and Other PKIs on
[3H]Thymidine Uptake in K562 Cells. The incorporation of
3H-labeled thymidine into DNA is a widely used method to evaluate
the rate of cell proliferation. Because our previous study demonstrated that
the SB class of p38 MAPK inhibitors potently blocked the transport of
[3H]uridine, we examined whether similar effects were observed with
[3H]thymidine uptake. Incubation of K562 cells with concentrations
from 0.1 to 10 µM demonstrated that SB203580-iodo, SB203580, and SB202474
inhibited the uptake of [3H]thymidine of K562 cells in a
dose-dependent manner, whereas SB220025 was largely without effect
(Fig. 4A). Since SB202474 does
not inhibit p38 MAPK (Lee et al.,
1994
) whereas SB220025 does
(Wang et al., 1998
), these
results indicated that the effects of these compounds on thymidine uptake
occurred independently of p38 MAPK inhibition and were similar to that
observed earlier with uridine transport
(Huang et al., 2002
). Like the
p38 MAPK inhibitors, a series of other PKIs (STI-571, AG825, AG1517, AG1478)
(Fig. 4B) or Ro 31-8220, Ro
31-6045, GF 109203X, or arcyriarubin A
(Fig. 4C) also showed potent
inhibitory effects on the transport of [3H]thymidine into these
cells (Fig. 4B). By contrast,
Ro 32-0432, did not inhibit the uptake of [3H]thymidine into these
cells (Fig. 4C), consistent
with the lack of effects of this compound on [3H]uridine transport
(Fig. 3B).
|
The Effects of PKIs on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation Does Not Correlate with the Effects of These Compounds on Cell Proliferation. Because our results suggested that PKIs inhibited the transport of [3H]thymidine, we examined whether the [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA was similarly affected. Consistent with the effects of these compounds on either [3H]uridine or [3H]thymidine uptake, the incorporation of 3H-labeled thymidine into DNA was inhibited by treatment of K562 cells with the tyrphostins AG825, AG1517, AG1478, bisindolylmaleimides GF 109203X, Ro 31-6045, arcyriarubin A, Ro 31-8220, STI-571, and NBMPR, a potent ENT1 inhibitor for 24 h (Fig. 5A and data not shown). However, comparing the effects of these compounds on the MTT cell proliferation assay demonstrated important differences. Although significant inhibition of 3H-labeled thymidine into DNA was observed, only Ro 31-8220 and STI-571 significantly inhibited cell proliferation at 24 h. Instead, when assayed at concentrations up to 10 µM, NBMPR, Ro 31-6045, and the other PKIs showed little or no effect on cell proliferation (Fig. 5A and data not shown) though Ro 31-6045 showed an inhibitory effect on cell proliferation at concentrations higher than 5 µM after 48 h of treatment. Thus these results demonstrate that the effects of NBMPR, Ro 31-6045, and some PKIs on [3H]thymidine uptake and incorporation can be dissociated from the effects on cell proliferation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the fact that we found that a large number of structurally diverse
PKIs inhibited transport, insight into the structure-function relationship for
these compounds is emerging. Like NBMPR, a well known ENT1 inhibitor, the
kinase inhibitors that are effective in inhibiting nucleoside transport are
structural purine or pyrimidine analogs or structurally related compounds.
Analysis of the tyrphostins, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or the bismaleimide
PKC inhibitors has allowed comparison of the structural requirements for these
compounds. Within the tyrphostins, the most potent compound was AG1517.
Increasing the number of substitutions on the 4'-phenyl group or the
loss of a strong electronegative group (i.e., Br, Cl) at the 3' position
of this ring significantly reduced the efficacy by which these compounds
affected nucleoside transport. By contrast, WHI-P154, the
4'-hydroxyphenyl derivative of AG1517 exhibited similar inhibition of
[3H]uridine uptake to AG1517 and AG1478, though it is reported to
have reduced inhibitory effects on the EGFR kinase itself
(Sudbeck et al., 1999
).
Although tyrphostin AG825 remarkably suppressed the uptake of
[3H]uridine, the structurally unrelated tyrosine kinase inhibitor
tyrphostin AG 18 and AG 490 only slightly inhibited uridine transport.
Similarly, the PKC class of inhibitors has revealed important structural
requirements for the inhibition of nucleoside transport. Staurosporine and
related analogs inhibit PKC by competing with ATP binding to the catalytic
domain of PKC (Herbert et al.,
1990
). Although staurosporine is considered a nonselective PKI, a
new generation of bisindolylmaleimide derivatives with an opened central
aromatic ring has been shown to have significantly improved selectivity for
PKC (Mahata et al., 2002
).
Three of the bisindolylmaleimide derivatives (GF 109203X, arcyriarubin A, and
Ro 31-8220) with relatively similar inhibitory potency
(Mahata et al., 2002
) showed
similar effects on nucleoside transport. Of the bisindoylmaleimide compounds
analyzed, only Ro 32-0432, another potent PKC inhibitor, did not inhibit
nucleoside transport in these cells. Structurally, this may be related to the
substitution of the (dimethylamino)methyl tetrahydropyridol group on the
indole ring of this compound; addition of this bulky group may compromise the
ability of Ro 32-0432 to inhibit nucleoside transport. By contrast, Ro 31-6045
(bisindolylmaleimide V), an inactive analog, was the most potent inhibitor of
[3H]uridine uptake within those bisindolylmaleimides tested.
Methylation of the amino group within the maleimide ring in
bisindolylmaleimide V (Ro 31-6045) abolishes the inhibitory activity on PKC;
however, neither methylation of this group nor addition of the cationic tail
at the indole nitrogen affected the inhibition of nucleoside transport. Taken
together, these results demonstrate that the effects of these compounds on
nucleoside transport are independent of PKC inhibition.
The observation that both the uptake of [3H]uridine and
[3H]thymidine were blocked by PKIs may be expected since both
nucleosides have been shown to be transported by the equilibrative transporter
(ENT1) (Ward et al., 2000
). In
addition to the short-term transport, the long-term incorporation of
[3H]thymidine into DNA, a common assay for cell proliferation, was
also prevented. However, the inhibitory effects of these compounds did not
correlate with the inhibition of cell proliferation by MTT analysis. This was
especially clear with the transport inhibitor NBMPR, suggesting a reason for
caution when using [3H]thymidine incorporation to evaluate cell
proliferation.
The implications of these studies for the application of PKIs in clinical
studies should be mentioned. Our finding that a range of PKIs including
STI-571 are also inhibitors of nucleoside transport raises the possibility of
antagonism between PKIs and compounds used as anticancer or immunosuppressive
agents. Cellular uptake of nucleoside analogs such as hydroxyurea, Ara-C, and
gemcitabine occurs by equilibrative nucleoside transport
(Gourdeau et al., 2001
;
Valdes et al., 2002
) and
increasing evidence has shown that the combination of PKIs with anti-leukemia
drugs can produce additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects in
combination chemotherapy. For instance, the combination of STI-571 with Ara-C
in several leukemia cell lines including K562 cells resulted in synergistic
effects (Raina et al., 2002
),
whereas the combination of STI-571 and hydroxyurea
(Thiesing et al., 2000
) or
methotrexate (Kano et al.,
2001
) demonstrated antagonistic effects. This prediction was
coincident with a recent finding that inhibition of c-abl with STI-571
attenuated the Ara-C-dependent activation of the stress-activated protein
kinase activation and apoptosis (Raina et
al., 2002
). BIBW22BS, a dipyridamole derivative and a highly
efficient inhibitor of equilibrative nucleoside transport, inhibited the
effects of gemcitabine in a variety of cancer cell lines up to 100-fold
(Jansen et al., 1995
).
Moreover, a nucleoside transportdeficient variant of CCRF-CEM leukemia cell
line (CEM/ARAC8C) exhibited high levels of resistance to Ara-C (1105fold) and
gemcitabine (432-fold) (Gourdeau et al.,
2001
).
Finally, activated immune cells and most solid tumors show a higher number
of NBMPR (NBTI) binding sites than their normal counterparts
(Goh et al., 1995
), indicating
increased capability for nucleoside transport. These cells may have increased
dependence on nucleoside salvage for nucleic acid synthesis. Thus, modifying
the activity of nucleoside transporters by PKIs may offer an attractive
approach to target both protein kinases and nucleoside transport and
potentially affect the outcome of immunosuppressive or anti-cancer therapies.
In this regard, rapamycin, a clinically important immunosuppressive agent,
also strongly inhibited the uptake of nucleosides in this study. In theory,
inhibition of plasma nucleoside salvage rescue by protein kinase inhibitors
such as rapamycin could potentially enhance chemotherapy of inhibitors of de
novo purine or pyrimidine synthesis (e.g., leflunomide, mycophenolic acid, and
methotrexate). Whether part of the clinical efficacy of these compounds is
derived from inhibition of nucleoside transport remains to be determined.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: PKI, protein kinase inhibitor; PKC, protein kinase C;
dFdC, gemcitabine; Ara-C, cytarabine; CdA, cladribine; F-ara-A, fludarabine;
CNT, concentrative nucleoside transporter; ENT, equilibrative nucleoside
transporter; NBMPR, nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribonucleoside; MAPK,
mitogen-activated protein kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; TOR,
target-of-rapamycin; EGFR, endothelial growth factor receptor; MTT,
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium; SB203580,
4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridinyl)imidazole;
SB203580-iodo,
4-(3-iodophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-imidazole;
SB220025,
5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-(4-piperidinyl)imidazole;
SB202474, 4-(ethyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-imidazole; PD153035
(AG1517), 4-(3-bromophenyl)amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; AG 1478,
4-(3-chloroanilino)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; WHI-P154,
4-[(3-bromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)amino]-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; WHI-P131,
4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; WHI-P258,
4-phenylamino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; WHI-P180,
4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; WHI-P97,
4-(3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline; AG18,
-cyano-(3,4-dihydroxy)cinnamonitrile; AG490,
-cyano-(3,4-dihydroxy)-N-benzylcinnamide; AG 1879 (PP2),
4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine;
H89 dihydrochloride,
N-[2-((p-bromocinnamyl)amino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide
2HCl; ZM336372,
N-[5-(3-dimethylaminobenzamido)-2-methylphenyl]-4-hydroxybenzamide;
KN93,
2-[N-(2-hydroxyethyl)]-N-(4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl)]amino-N-(4-chlorocinnamyl)-N-methylbenzylamine);
LY 294002, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one;
arcyriarubin A, 2,3-bis(1H-indol-3-yl)maleimide; Ro 31-8220,
3-[1-[3-(amidinothio)propyl-1H-indol-3-yl]-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)maleimide;
Ro 32-0432,
2-{8-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyrido[1,2-
]indol-3-yl}-3-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)maleimide
HCl; Ro 31-6045,
2,3-bis(1H-indol-3-yl)-N-methylmaleimide; GF
109203X,
2-[1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-maleimide;
olomoucine, 2-(2-hydroxyethylamino)-6-benzylamino-9-methylpurine; roscovitine,
2-(R)-(1-ethyl-2-hydroxyethylamino)-6-benzylamino-9-isopropylpurine.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Lee M. Graves, Department of Pharmacology, 936 Mary Ellen Jones Bldg. CB 7365, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7365. E-mail: LMG{at}med.unc.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arteaga CL, Ramsey TT, Shawver LK, and Guyer CA (1997)
Unliganded epidermal growth factor receptor dimerization induced by direct
interaction of quinazolines with the ATP binding site. J Biol
Chem 272:
2324723254.
Baldwin SA, Mackey JR, Cass CE, and Young JD (1999)
Nucleoside transporters: molecular biology and implications for therapeutic
development. Mol Med Today
5:
216224.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ben-Bassat H (2001) Biological activity of tyrosine
kinase inhibitors: novel agents for psoriasis therapy. Curr Opin
Investig Drugs 2:
15391545.[Medline]
Birchall AM, Bishop J, Bradshaw D, Cline A, Coffey J, Elliott LH,
Gibson VM, Greenham A, Hallam TJ, Harris W, et al. (1994) Ro
32-0432, a selective and orally active inhibitor of protein kinase C prevents
T-cell activation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
268:
922929.
Boleti H, Coe IR, Baldwin SA, Young JD, and Cass CE
(1997) Molecular identification of the equilibrative
NBMPR-sensitive (es) nucleoside transporter and demonstration of an
equilibrative NBMPR-insensitive (ei) transport activity in human
erythroleukemia (K562) cells. Neuropharmacology
36:
11671179.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buolamwini JK (2000) Cell cycle molecular targets in
novel anticancer drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des
6:
379392.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carmichael J, DeGraff WG, Gazdar AF, Minna JD, and Mitchell JB
(1987) Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated
colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer
Res 47:
936942.
Cass CE, Young JD, Baldwin SA, Cabrita MA, Graham KA, Griffiths M,
Jennings LL, Mackey JR, Ng AM, Ritzel MW, et al. (1999)
Nucleoside transporters of mammalian cells. Pharm
Biotechnol 12:
313352.[Medline]
Davis PD, Hill CH, Lawton G, Nixon JS, Wilkinson SE, Hurst SA,
Keech E, and Turner SE (1992) Inhibitors of protein kinase C. 1.
2,3-Bisarylmaleimides. J Med Chem
35:
177184.[CrossRef][Medline]
Galmarini CM, Mackey JR, and Dumontet C (2001)
Nucleoside analogues: mechanisms of drug resistance and reversal strategies.
Leukemia 15:
875890.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ganeshaguru K, Wickremasinghe RG, Jones DT, Gordon M, Hart SM,
Virchis AE, Prentice HG, Hoffbrand AV, Man A, Champain K, et al.
(2002) Actions of the selective protein kinase C inhibitor PKC412
on B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro.
Haematologica 87:
167176.
Gekeler V, Boer R, Ise W, Sanders KH, Schachtele C, and Beck J
(1995) The specific bisindolylmaleimide PKC-inhibitor GF 109203X
efficiently modulates MRPassociated multiple drug resistance.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
206:
119126.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goh LB, Mack P, and Lee CW (1995)
Nitrobenzylthioinosine-binding protein overexpression in human breast, liver,
stomach and colorectal tumour tissues. Anticancer Res
15:
25752579.[Medline]
Gotoh Y, Noda T, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K, Rhoads CA, and Aw TY
(2002) Lipid peroxide-induced redox imbalance differentially
mediates CaCo-2 cell proliferation and growth arrest. Cell
Prolif 35:
221235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gourdeau H, Clarke ML, Ouellet F, Mowles D, Selner M, Richard A,
Lee N, Mackey JR, Young JD, Jolivet J, et al. (2001) Mechanisms
of uptake and resistance to troxacitabine, a novel deoxycytidine nucleoside
analogue, in human leukemic and solid tumor cell lines. Cancer
Res 61:
72177224.
Hammond JR (2000) Interaction of a series of
draflazine analogues with equilibrative nucleoside transporters: species
differences and transporter subtype selectivity.
Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
361:
373382.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hennequin LF, Thomas AP, Johnstone C, Stokes ES,
Pl
PA, Lohmann JJ, Ogilvie DJ, Dukes M, Wedge
SR, Curwen JO, et al. (1999) Design and structure-activity
relationship of a new class of potent VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase
inhibitors. J Med Chem
42:
53695389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Herbert JM, Seban E, and Maffrand JP (1990)
Characterization of specific binding sites for [3H]-staurosporine on various
protein kinases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun
171:
189195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang M, Wang Y, Collins M, Gu JJ, Mitchell BS, and Graves LM
(2002) Inhibition of nucleoside transport by p38 MAPK inhibitors.
J Biol Chem 277:
2836428367.
Jansen WJ, Pinedo HM, van der Wilt CL, Feller N, Bamberger U, and
Boven E (1995) The influence of BIBW22BS, a dipyridamole
derivative, on the antiproliferative effects of 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate
and gemcitabine in vitro and in human tumour xenografts. Eur J
Cancer 31A:
23132319.[CrossRef]
Kano Y, Akutsu M, Tsunoda S, Mano H, Sato Y, Honma Y, and Furukawa
Y (2001) In vitro cytotoxic effects of a tyrosine kinase
inhibitor STI571 in combination with commonly used antileukemic agents.
Blood 97:
19992007.
Lackey K, Cory M, Davis R, Frye SV, Harris PA, Hunter RN, Jung DK,
McDonald OB, McNutt RW, Peel MR, et al. (2000) The discovery of
potent cRaf1 kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett
10:
223226.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee JC, Laydon JT, McDonnell PC, Gallagher TF, Kumar S, Green D,
McNulty D, Blumenthal MJ, Heys JR, Landvatter SW, et al. (1994) A
protein kinase involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine
biosynthesis. Nature (Lond)
372:
739746.[CrossRef][Medline]
Levitzki A and Gazit A (1995) Tyrosine kinase
inhibition: an approach to drug development. Science (Wash
DC) 267:
17821788.
Lichtner RB, Menrad A, Sommer A, Klar U, and Schneider MR
(2001) Signalinginactive epidermal growth factor receptor/ligand
complexes in intact carcinoma cells by quinazoline tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Cancer Res 61:
57905795.
Mahata M, Mahapatra NR, O'Connor DT, and Mahata SK
(2002) Chromaffin cell catecholamine secretion:
bisindolylmaleimide compounds exhibit novel and potent antagonist effects at
the nicotinic cholinergic receptor in pheochromocytoma cells. Mol
Pharmacol 61:
13401347.
Merritt JE, Sullivan JA, Drew L, Khan A, Wilson K, Mulqueen M,
Harris W, Bradshaw D, Hill CH, Rumsby M, and Warr R (1999) The
bisindolylmaleimide protein kinase C inhibitor, Ro 32-2241, reverses multidrug
resistance in KB tumour cells. Cancer Chemother
Pharmacol 43:
371378.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pastor-Anglada M, Casado FJ, Valdes R, Mata J, Garcia-Manteiga J,
and Molina M (2001) Complex regulation of nucleoside transporter
expression in epithelial and immune system cells. Mol Membr
Biol 18:
8185.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pastor-Anglada M, Felipe A, and Casado FJ (1998)
Transport and mode of action of nucleoside derivatives used in chemical and
antiviral therapies. Trends Pharmacol Sci
19:
424430.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raina D, Mishra N, Kumar S, Kharbanda S, Saxena S, and Kufe D
(2002) Inhibition of c-Abl with STI571 attenuates
stress-activated protein kinase activation and apoptosis in the cellular
response to 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine. Mol
Pharmacol 61:
14891495.
Ramakrishnan L and Rosenberg N (1989) abl genes.
Biochim Biophys Acta
989:
209224.[Medline]
Shah NP and Sawyers CL (2001) Recent success with the
tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI-571lessons for targeted therapy of
cancer. Curr Opin Investig Drugs
2:
422423.[Medline]
Sudbeck EA, Liu XP, Narla RK, Mahajan S, Ghosh S, Mao C, and Uckun
FM (1999) Structure-based design of specific inhibitors of Janus
kinase 3 as apoptosisinducing antileukemic agents. Clin Cancer
Res 5:
15691582.
Swannie HC and Kaye SB (2002) Protein kinase C
inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep
4:
3746.[Medline]
Tanos V, Brzezinski A, Drize O, Strauss N, and Peretz T
(2002) Synergistic inhibitory effects of genistein and tamoxifen
on human dysplastic and malignant epithelial breast cells in vitro.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
102:
188194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thiesing JT, Ohno-Jones S, Kolibaba KS, and Druker BJ
(2000) Efficacy of STI571, an abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in
conjunction with other antileukemic agents against bcr-abl-positive cells.
Blood 96:
31953199.
Tsai CM, Levitzki A, Wu LH, Chang KT, Cheng CC, Gazit A, and Perng
RP (1996) Enhancement of chemosensitivity by tyrphostin AG825 in
high-p185(neu) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer
Res 56:
10681074.
Valdes R, Casado FJ, and Pastor-Anglada M (2002)
Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of CNT1, a concentrative nucleoside
transporter involved in the uptake of cellcycle-dependent nucleoside-derived
anticancer drugs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun
296:
575579.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang Z, Canagarajah BJ, Boehm JC, Kassisa S, Cobb MH, Young PR,
Abdel-Meguid S, Adams JL, and Goldsmith EJ (1998) Structural
basis of inhibitor selectivity in MAP kinases.
Structure 6:
11171128.[Medline]
Ward JL, Sherali A, Mo ZP, and Tse CM (2000) Kinetic
and pharmacological properties of cloned human equilibrative nucleoside
transporters, ENT1 and ENT2, stably expressed in nucleoside
transporter-deficient PK15 cells. Ent2 exhibits a low affinity for guanosine
and cytidine but a high affinity for inosine. J Biol
Chem 275:
83758381.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Reardon, M. J. Egorin, J. A. Quinn, J. N. Rich Sr, I. Gururangan, J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, S. Sathornsumetee, J. M. Provenzale, J. E. Herndon II, et al. Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate Plus Hydroxyurea in Adults With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9359 - 9368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Morel, G. Ibarz, C. Oiry, E. Carnazzi, G. Berge, D. Gagne, J.-C. Galleyrand, and J. Martinez Cross-interactions of Two p38 Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Inhibitors and Two Cholecystokinin (CCK) Receptor Antagonists with the CCK1 Receptor and P38 MAP Kinase J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21384 - 21393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Gu, L. Santiago, and B. S. Mitchell Synergy between imatinib and mycophenolic acid in inducing apoptosis in cell lines expressing Bcr-Abl Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3270 - 3277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Coy, R. Romar, R. R Payton, L. McCann, A. M Saxton, and J L. Edwards Maintenance of meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes using the S-enantiomer of roscovitine: effects on maturation, fertilization and subsequent embryo development in vitro Reproduction, January 1, 2005; 129(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Hamden, P. W. Ford, A. G. Whitman, O. F. Dyson, S.-Y. Cheng, J. A. McCubrey, and S. M. Akula Raf-Induced Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Augments Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Infection J. Virol., December 1, 2004; 78(23): 13381 - 13390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chaudary, Z. Naydenova, I. Shuralyova, and I. R. Coe The Adenosine Transporter, mENT1, Is a Target for Adenosine Receptor Signaling and Protein Kinase C{epsilon} in Hypoxic and Pharmacological Preconditioning in the Mouse Cardiomyocyte Cell Line, HL-1 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2004; 310(3): 1190 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||