![]() |
|
|
Vol. 304, Issue 1, 391-399, January 2003
Division of Molecular Psychiatry, Abraham Ribicoff Research Facilities, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Behavioral and molecular studies have established a link between drugs of abuse and the central melanocortin system, particularly the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4-R). The present study expands this line of investigation to characterization of the neurochemical and behavioral interactions between MC4-R and the psychomotor stimulant, cocaine. The results demonstrate that repeated, but not acute, cocaine administration up-regulates MC4-R mRNA expression in the striatum and hippocampus, but not cerebral cortex. Pharmacological studies indicate that the up-regulation of MC4-R expression occurs via dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-dependent mechanisms. The D1/D2 antagonist haloperidol and the D2-selective antagonist eticlopride mimic the effect of cocaine on MC4-R expression. In addition, coadministration of a D1-selective antagonist, SCH 23390 [R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine], completely blocks the up-regulation of MC4 mRNA by cocaine, demonstrating that D1 receptor activation is necessary for this response. Moreover, the results demonstrate that cocaine treatment increases behavioral responses (grooming and locomotor activity) to infusions of a melanocortin agonist, indicating that up-regulation of MC4-R expression results in functional consequences. These data further support a role for the melanocortin-MC4-R neuropeptide system in the biochemical and behavioral effects of cocaine.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pro-opiomelanocortin
(POMC) serves as a precursor for a number of neuropeptides, including
the melanocortins,
-,
-, and
-melanocyte- stimulating hormone
(MSH), and adrenocorticotrophic hormone, as well as
-endorphin. POMC-expressing neurons are located in the pituitary,
the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, and the nucleus of the
solitary tract; and the latter two structures send projections to a
number of different brain regions, including the mesolimbic dopamine
system (Jacobowitz and O'Donohue, 1978
; Eskay et al., 1979
).
The melanocortin neuropeptides are reported to influence a variety of
behavioral and neuroendocrine systems via regulation of central nervous
system centers, including grooming, thermoregulation, and learning
(Alvaro et al., 1997
). The actions of melanocortins are mediated via
activation of melanocortin receptors, of which there are five subtypes,
all of which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Two
of these, melanocortin-3 and -4 (MC3-R and MC4-R) are expressed in
significant levels in the brain and are thereby thought to mediate the
central actions of melanocortin neuropeptides.
Melanocortins are also reported to play a role in the behavioral and
neurochemical actions of opiates, psychostimulants, and alcohol. Early
studies indicated that melanocortin treatment could antagonize opiate
tolerance and dependence, and even induce opiate withdrawal-like
effects in naive animals (Szekaly et al., 1979
; Contreras and Takemori,
1984
). A preliminary study also found that a selective MC4-R antagonist
attenuates the signs of morphine withdrawal that are induced by
naloxone in opiate-dependent animals (Zhou et al., 2001
). We have also
found that chronic administration of morphine down-regulates the
expression of MC4-R in striatum and periaqueductal gray, two regions
implicated in drug reward and withdrawal, providing additional support
that the MC4-R subtype is involved in the long-term actions of opiates
(Alvaro et al., 1996
). With regard to psychostimulants, a recent study
demonstrates that administration of a melanocortin agonist augments the
threshold lowering effect of amphetamine for lateral hypothalamic
self-stimulation (Cabeza de Vaca et al., 2002
). In addition, we have
recently reported that chronic cocaine treatment increases the
expression of MC4-R mRNA in striatum and that administration of a
melanocortin antagonist blocks the rewarding and locomotor-activating
effects of cocaine (Hsu et al., 2002
). Finally, administration
of a melanocortin receptor agonist has been shown to alter ethanol
intake in alcohol-preferring rats (Ploj et al., 2000
).
The current study was initiated to extend these findings in three key
areas: to determine the 1) time course and 2) dopaminergic receptor
subtypes that are responsible for cocaine up-regulation of MC4-R
expression, and 3) the behavioral consequences of cocaine treatment on
melanocortin function. The results demonstrate that repeated, but not
acute, administration of cocaine up-regulates MC4-R expression in the
striatum of rat brain and that this effect is dependent on
D1 receptor activation. In addition, the results demonstrate that the effects of
-MSH on grooming behavior are increased by cocaine treatment. These findings provide additional support that the melanocortin-MC4-R system plays a role in the long-term actions of cocaine and morphine and begin to elucidate the
neurobiological mechanisms underlying these effects.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug Treatments.
All drugs were administered i.p., and rats
(male Sprague-Dawley, 160-180 g) were sacrificed 3 h after the
final injection. The doses and 15-day time point for cocaine and other
drug treatments were chosen based on previous neurochemical studies
(Hope et al., 1992
; Nibuya et al., 1995
; Nye et al., 1995
;
Horger et al., 1999
): cocaine, 15 mg/kg, one single treatment (1 day)
or twice daily for 4 or 14 days with a single injection following day 5 or 15, respectively; haloperidol, 2 mg/kg once daily for 21 days;
eticlopride, 0.5 mg/kg once daily for 15 days; apomorphine, 1.0 mg/kg
twice daily for 14 days and a single treatment on day 15; SCH 23390, 0.5 mg/kg once daily for 15 days; desipramine, 10 mg/kg twice daily for
14 days and a single treatment on day 15; fluoxetine, 3 mg/kg twice
daily for 14 days and a single treatment on day 15; morphine, high
dose: 75 mg subcutaneous pellet, one per day for 5 days; morphine,
escalating dose: 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 2; 20 mg/kg on days 3 and 4; 40 mg/kg on days 5 and 6; 80 mg/kg on days 7 and 8; 120 mg/kg on days 9, 10, and 11; morphine, low dose: 2 mg/kg once daily every other day for
11 days.
RNase Protection and in Situ Hybridization Analysis.
Total
RNA from various rat brain regions was extracted by homogenization in
guanidine isothiocyanate followed by centrifugation through cesium
chloride gradients. A 185-bp
[
-32P]CTP-labeled antisense riboprobe
synthesized from rat MC4-R cDNA (Alvaro et al., 1996
) was hybridized at
63°C for 18 h with 20 to 30 µg total RNA per sample. Samples
were RNase-treated, precipitated, resuspended in 80% formamide, and
run on 8% polyacrylamide gels as described previously (Alvaro et al.,
1996
). Gels were dried and exposed to X-ray film with an intensifier
screen, and autoradiograms were quantified using a
phosphorimaging process.
-32P]CTP-labeled mouse antisense riboprobe
according to standard procedures (Nibuya et al., 1995Surgery.
Bilateral indwelling cannulae (23-gauge) were
implanted under Equithesin (4.5 mg/kg i.p.) anesthesia. Standard
stereotaxic (David Kopf, Tujunga, CA) procedures were used with aseptic
surgical techniques. Coordinates for i.c.v. infusions were based on the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1982)
with skull flat: anterior-posterior
1.3 from bregma, medial-lateral ±0.5 from the midline, dorsoventral
4.5 from skull. Stainless steel guide cannulae were lowered in pairs
while mounted on "stylettes" fixed to electrode carriers. They were
aimed to terminate 1.0 mm above the infusion sites. Stainless steel
mounting screws and light curable dental resin was used to achieve
permanent guide cannulae implantation and fixation to the skull.
Temporary stylettes were placed in the guide cannula to prevent
occlusion. Animals were allowed a minimum of 7 days to recover, and
stylettes were checked regularly.
Drug Microinfusions.
Infusions (i.c.v.) of
-MSH (1.0 µg/1.0 µl; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were made bilaterally 15 min before the test. Injection cannulae (31-gauge), attached to PE-10
polyethylene tubing (Clay Adams, Parsippany, NJ) were manually lowered
through the guides to the final infusion site. A microdrive pump
(Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA) with 10-µl Hamilton
microsyringes (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV) was used to deliver the
drug. All infusions were made bilaterally in volumes of 0.5 µl over a
period of 2 min with an additional 2 min allowed to elapse prior to
removal of the infusion needles and replacement of the stylettes.
Subjects were hand-held during the infusions.
Behavioral Analysis. Before the drug treatment phase, animals were habituated to the locomotor activity boxes for 1 h over two sessions. One week after surgery to implant cannula (i.c.v.), subjects were administered saline or cocaine (15 mg/kg, twice daily for 14 days).
Three hours after the last cocaine or saline treatment, subjects were given bilateral infusions of
-MSH or saline i.c.v. Five minutes
later, they were placed in the activity monitoring cages, and locomotor
behavior was measured for 60 min. Locomotor activity was quantified
using the automated Omnitech (Columbus, OH) Digiscan Micro-monitor
system equipped with 16 photocells per chamber. Locomotor activity or
ambulation, defined as consecutive beam breaks, was collected in 10-min
intervals. The activity chambers were located inside a sound-attenuated
room equipped with a white noise generator. During activity testing,
the room was illuminated with red light only. Forty minutes after the
infusions, subjects were also assessed for several other behaviors
(i.e., time spent grooming, number of grooming bouts, stretching, and
rearing) by an observer unaware of the treatment. Grooming activity did
not result in consecutive beam breaks and therefore did not interfere with locomotor activity measurements. These assessments were made over
a 10-min period. Significant behavioral effects were further analyzed
by factorial ANOVA with Scheffe's F test. Data are expressed as
mean ± S.E.M.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time Course for the Induction of MC4-R mRNA by Cocaine
Treatment.
In a previous study we have found that chronic
administration of morphine significantly decreases the expression of
MC4-R mRNA in the striatum of rat brain (Alvaro et al., 1996
). To
extend these findings to another drug of abuse, the time course for the influence of repeated cocaine administration on the expression of MC4-R
in rat brain was determined. Rats received a single dose of cocaine (1 day) or were administered cocaine twice daily for 4 or 14 days, and on
the next morning (5th or 15th days), a final cocaine injection was
given. In all cases tissue was harvested 3 h later. Levels of
MC4-R mRNA were determined by RNase protection analysis using a
radiolabeled antisense MC4-R riboprobe (Fig. 1). In our previous study we reported
that only MC4-R, and not MC1-R or MC3-R, was expressed in most brain
regions (MC3-R is expressed in hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray,
but not striatum) (Alvaro et al., 1996
). In the present study we found
that repeated cocaine administration resulted in a highly significant
and robust up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA in striatum and hippocampus
(Figs. 1 and 2), but not in cerebral
cortex (not shown). The up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA was dependent on
repeated cocaine exposure, as there was no significant effect at the
earlier time points examined (1 and 4 days of treatment) (Fig. 2).
|
|
Pharmacological Characterization of the Induction of MC4-R by
Cocaine.
Studies were next conducted to characterize the dopamine
receptor subtypes that account for up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA by repeated cocaine. The actions of cocaine on the mesolimbic dopamine system involve regulation of D1 and
D2 receptors, albeit an indirect effect via
inhibition of dopamine reuptake (Wise, 1996
; White and Kalivas, 1998
).
The influence of a number of direct-acting D1 and
D2 antagonists and agonists on the up-regulation
of MC4-R was examined to determine whether increased expression occurs through activation of a specific dopamine receptor subtype. The drug
doses were chosen based on a previous in vivo study (Nye et al., 1995
).
Chronic administration of the nonselective
D1/D2 antagonist
haloperidol, like cocaine, also resulted in a significant up-regulation
of MC4-R mRNA in striatum (Fig. 3).
Similar results were seen following chronic administration of a
D2-selective antagonist, eticlopride. This effect
was not observed with chronic administration of either a
D1-selective antagonist, SCH 23390, or a
nonselective D1/D2 agonist,
apomorphine. The effects of two antidepressant drugs that do not
directly influence dopamine reuptake or transmission were also
examined. Repeated administration of desipramine, a norepinephrine
selective reuptake inhibitor, or fluoxetine, a serotonin selective
reuptake inhibitor, did not significantly alter levels of MC4-R mRNA in
the striatum.
|
|
Regulation of MC4-R Expression by Repeated Morphine
Administration.
In a previous study we found that chronic
administration of morphine decreased the expression of MC4-R mRNA in
striatum (Alvaro et al., 1996
). Given this finding, the results of the
current investigation demonstrating that cocaine administration
increases MC4-R expression were surprising. However, the dose of
morphine used in the previous study was very high (75-mg pellet once a day) and the length of treatment was relatively short (5 days). This
treatment regimen is often used to rapidly produce a state of tolerance
and dependence (Reith et al., 1987
; Rasmussen et al., 1990
). In
addition, the dose is much higher and the treatment time shorter than
those that are used to produce behavioral sensitization to morphine (2 mg/kg per day for 10 days) and that would produce a behavioral state
more comparable with that produced by the cocaine sensitization regimen
used in the current study (Babbini and Davis, 1972
; Reith et al.,
1987
). Therefore, a study was conducted to determine the influence of a
low dose of morphine on the expression of MC4-R mRNA. Administration of
morphine using the low-dose (2 mg/kg, 10 days) paradigm significantly
increased the expression of MC4-R mRNA in striatum, similar to the
effect of cocaine (Fig. 5). In contrast,
the high-dose morphine regimen produced a significant down-regulation
of MC4-R mRNA as reported in our previous study (Fig. 5). An
intermediate regimen was also tested, in which the dose of morphine is
increased during the course of treatment. Using this intermediate,
escalating morphine dose regimen, the expression of MC4-R was not
significantly altered, presumably because of the counteracting effects
of the tolerance and sensitization effects produced by this treatment
paradigm. These results indicate that the regulation of MC4-R by
morphine correlates with the behavioral effects of the different
treatment regimens. However, it is also possible that the different
treatment protocols (i.e., s.c. morphine pellets under halothane
anesthesia versus i.p morphine injections) result in altered control
levels of MC4-R that could influence the effect of morphine treatment.
|
Influence of Cocaine Administration on the Expression of POMC mRNA
in Arcuate Nucleus.
To provide a complete examination of the
effects of cocaine on the melanocortin system, the expression of POMC
mRNA in the hypothalamus was also studied. Levels of POMC mRNA in the
arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus were determined by in situ
hybridization analysis using an antisense mouse POMC riboprobe.
Repeated administration of cocaine, using the regimen described above
for the MC4-R mRNA studies, resulted in a significant down-regulation
of POMC mRNA levels in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (Fig.
6).
|
Influence of Cocaine Administration on Grooming Behavior and
Locomotor Activity.
To determine whether the up-regulation of
MC4-R results in alteration of melanocortin receptor function, a well
established behavioral response to melanocortins, grooming, as well as
locomotor activity, was examined. Grooming is one of the most robust
acute actions of melanocortins (Gispen et al., 1975
), and increased grooming is mediated by activation of MC4-R (Von Frijtag et al., 1998
;
Adan et al., 1999
). The amount of time spent grooming and the number of
grooming bouts, as well as the time spent stretching and rearing, were
determined by an observer blinded to the treatment condition. Animals
were implanted with bilateral cannulae into the lateral ventricles and,
after a short recovery time, were treated with cocaine for 14 days.
Three hours after the final injection of cocaine, the animals received
bilateral i.c.v. infusion of
-MSH or saline. The 3-h time point was
chosen because the locomotor activating effects of cocaine are no
longer apparent and therefore would not compete with other behavioral
responses (Post and Rose, 1976
) (also see below). Forty minutes after
the infusion, grooming behavior was measured over a 10-min period. Bilateral saline infusions (i.c.v.) resulted in very little or no
grooming behavior in animals previously treated with either saline or
cocaine (Fig. 7). In contrast, bilateral
-MSH infusions (i.c.v.) produced a robust induction of grooming in
the saline-treated control animals, and this effect was significantly
increased by approximately 2-fold in animals that received the chronic
cocaine treatment regimen (Fig. 7).
|
-MSH or saline and were placed in locomotor activity
chambers. A moderate level of activity was observed in all groups at
the first time point, most likely as a result of handling and
introduction into the activity chambers. There was no significant
elevation of locomotor activity in the cocaine-treated groups at the
first 10-min time interval as expected, because the locomotor
activation in response to cocaine is known to largely return to normal
3 h after cocaine injection. The level of activity rapidly
subsided in all four groups as the animals became accustomed to the
chambers (Fig. 8). However, over the ensuing 50 min of the test period, the cocaine-treated animals receiving
-MSH infusion exhibited a level of locomotor activity that
was significantly greater than that seen in the cocaine alone group or
the other control groups (Fig. 8). At each subsequent 10-min interval
throughout the test period, the cocaine/
-MSH group maintained a
statistically significant increase in activity relative to one or more
of the control groups.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of this study extend previous findings and provide further evidence of interactions between the melanocortin system and two drugs of abuse, cocaine and morphine. In the present study evidence is presented to demonstrate that repeated, but not acute, cocaine administration increases MC4-R expression in the striatum and decreases POMC expression in the arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus. In addition, the results demonstrate that repeated administration of cocaine augments the behavioral actions of the melanocortin-MC4-R neuropeptide system.
Previous work has demonstrated that only MC4-R mRNA is expressed in the
striatum and that repeated administration of a high dose of morphine
down-regulates MC4-R mRNA levels in this brain region (Alvaro et al.,
1996
). The results of the current investigation demonstrate that
repeated administration of cocaine up-regulates the expression of MC4-R
in the striatum and hippocampus, but not in the cerebral cortex. In the
striatum, the induction of MC4-R is particularly dramatic. The 2- to
3-fold increase in MC4-R mRNA with respect to controls is a degree of
change rarely reported in the literature for regulation of a
neurotransmitter or neuropeptide receptor in the nervous system. The
results also demonstrate that the induction of MC4-R mRNA is
time-dependent in that long-term (15-day), but not acute or short-term
(1- or 5-day), administration up-regulates MC4-R mRNA in striatum and hippocampus.
To examine the dopamine receptor mechanisms through which cocaine could
effect such a large change in the striatum, the influence of various
dopaminergic compounds on the expression of MC4-R was examined. The
role of dopamine D1- and
D2-like receptors in the neurochemical and
behavioral actions of cocaine is complex, and both receptor subtypes
are reported to be involved (Wise, 1996
; White and Kalivas, 1998
; White
et al., 1998
). The results of the present study are consistent with
previous pharmacological studies and provide evidence for two major
points to be made regarding the dopamine receptor subtypes that
underlie cocaine regulation of MC4-R. First, the actions of cocaine on
MC4-R expression are dependent on D1 receptor
activation, inasmuch as daily pretreatment with a
D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, completely
blocks the up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA. A similar pharmacological
profile for D1 receptors has also been reported
for cocaine reward (Maldonado et al., 1993
; McGregor and Roberts, 1995
)
and the acute neurochemical actions of cocaine (Graybiel et al., 1990
;
Young et al., 1991
; Couceyro et al., 1994
). Second, chronic
D2 receptor blockade, either with a nonselective
dopamine D1/D2 receptor
antagonist, haloperidol, or a very selective D2
receptor antagonist, eticlopride, also increased the expression of
MC4-R mRNA in striatum. D2 receptor blockade by
haloperidol or eticlopride could result in up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA
via blockade of autoreceptors leading to increased dopamine release
(Nye et al., 1995
; Rouge-Pont et al., 2002
). However, it is important
to point out that only single drug doses were tested, and that in some
cases the doses used could be high enough to influence other
neurotransmitter systems that could contribute to the up-regulation of
MC4-R. For example, the doses of haloperidol and SCH 23390 could
influence serotonin receptor subtypes (Bischoff et al., 1986
; Schotte
et al., 1993
).
The influence of a nonselective
D1/D2 receptor agonist,
apomorphine, on expression of MC4-R was also examined. Chronic
administration of apomorphine produced a small induction (approximately
25%) of MC4-R mRNA that was not significant, and not nearly as
efficacious as either cocaine or D2 receptor
blockade. One explanation could be that the dose and pharmacokinetics
of the drug are critical to the response, and that alternate treatment
schedules might produce effects similar to those of cocaine. This
possibility is supported by the opposite actions of two different
morphine treatment regimens on the expression of MC4-R in striatum.
Administration of selective D1 or
D2 agonists, or combinations of these selective agonists, can mimic the acute and chronic actions of cocaine (Wise, 1996
; White and Kalivas, 1998
), and future studies will be needed to
further examine the influence of these agents on the expression of
MC4-R.
The results also demonstrate that chronic elevation of two other monoamines, norepinephrine or serotonin, via administration of selective reuptake inhibitors, does not increase the expression of MC4-R mRNA in the striatum. These results indicate that the up-regulation of MC4-R is dependent on activation of the dopamine neurotransmitter system, although it is possible that higher doses of the reuptake blockers could also result in regulation of MC4-R expression. However, as discussed for apomorphine and morphine, it is also possible that other treatment regimens could result in up-regulation of MC4-R expression in striatum. The receptor mechanisms underlying the up-regulation of MC4-R mRNA in the hippocampus were not examined but could involve some of the same dopamine receptor mechanisms that account for increased expression of MC4-R in striatum, or could result from recruitment of other neurotransmitter systems.
The pharmacological profile of MC4-R up-regulation in the striatum by
dopaminergic compounds is strikingly similar to the acute and chronic
regulation of c-Fos and Fos-related antigens in this brain region
(Graybiel et al., 1990
; Young et al., 1991
; Couceyro et al., 1994
; Nye
et al., 1995
; Hiroi et al., 1997
). Chronic, but not acute,
administration of cocaine up-regulates the expression of
FosB and
related isoforms in the striatum. Activation of
D1 receptors is necessary for increased
expression of c-Fos and
FosB, and D2 receptor
blockade mimics the effect of cocaine. The similar time course and
pharmacological profile for the induction of both
FosB
immunoreactivity and MC4-R mRNA in the striatum is correlative but
suggests that the dopamine receptor mechanisms underlying their
regulation may be related. In addition, these results raise the
possibility that induction of MC4-R mRNA could be mediated by
up-regulation of c-Fos and
FosB. Studies are currently being
conducted to determine whether the expression of MC4-R is altered in
FosB transgenic mice that exhibit enhanced sensitivity to cocaine
(Kelz et al., 1999
).
In a previous study, we established that chronic administration of
morphine down-regulates MC4-R mRNA in the striatum (Alvaro et al.,
1996
), yet in the current investigation, we report an up-regulation of
the MC4-R mRNA following chronic cocaine treatment. It is important to
note, however, that in the previous study, chronic morphine treatment
involved implanting rats with 75-mg subcutaneous morphine pellets once
daily for 5 days. In other words, the dosing was both continuous and
extremely high. In the present study, on the other hand, the dose of
cocaine used was comparatively much lower and was also intermittent.
Previous studies demonstrate that the behavioral and biochemical
effects of drugs of abuse depend on the dose administered and the
dosing paradigm used (Reith et al., 1987
; Nye et al., 1995
). Based on
these findings, we hypothesized that the difference between the effect
of morphine observed previously and the actions of cocaine in the
current study might result from disparities in drug dosing and
scheduling. Therefore, the continuous high-dose morphine paradigm used
in the previous study was compared with an intermittent low-dose treatment schedule, as well as an escalating treatment regimen. As the
results demonstrate, the intermittent, low-dose morphine regimen
significantly up-regulates MC4-R expression in the striatum, similar to
the effect of cocaine. What makes these findings particularly interesting is that MC4-R mRNA levels appear to correlate with the
behavioral effects of morphine. Administration of a high dose of
morphine using a continuous treatment regimen, as used in our previous
study (Alvaro et al., 1996
) leads to tolerance and dependence (Rasmussen et al., 1990
) and decreases the expression of MC4-R in
striatum. In contrast, administration of a low dose of morphine using
an intermittent regimen, as used in the current study, produces behavioral sensitization (Reith et al., 1987
) and increases the expression of MC4-R mRNA in striatum. This is consistent with the
effects of the cocaine regimen that also produces locomotor sensitization (Horger et al., 1999
) and up-regulates MC4-R expression. The results of these studies suggest that MC4-R expression can be up-
or down-regulated depending on the type of drug treatment regimen used
and that this may result in different behavioral responses mediated by
the melanocortin-MC4-R system.
To begin to examine the behavioral interactions between the
melanocortin system and repeated administration of cocaine, a melanocortin-regulated behavior was examined. The ability of
-MSH to
induce excessive grooming is a well known and easily identified behavioral effect of melanocortin action in the brain (Gispen et al.,
1975
). The significance of these results resides in the fact that
animals that receive both chronic cocaine treatment and
-MSH
infusion exhibit markedly enhanced grooming relative to
non-cocaine-treated controls receiving the same dose of
-MSH. Structure-activity relationship studies of melanocortin analogs indicate that grooming induction occurs primarily via activation of
MC4-R and not at other MC-R subtypes (Von Frijtag et al., 1998
; Adan et
al., 1999
). It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the increase in
excessive grooming seen in chronic cocaine-treated rats results from
functional up-regulation of MC4-R. At issue is in which brain region
this functional up-regulation is occurring. The results of the current
study implicate the striatum, which includes the dorsal striatum and
nucleus accumbens. Previous studies indicate that dorsal striatum does
not mediate melanocortin induction of grooming (Wiegant et al., 1977
;
Argiolas et al., 2000
), but melanocortin infusion into the nucleus
accumbens is reported to increase grooming (Ryan and Isaacson, 1983
).
It is also possible that regulation of MC4-R expression in other brain
regions implicated in grooming behavior, including ventral tegmentum
(Torre and Celis, 1988
), periaqueductal gray (Spruijt et al., 1986
),
and paraventricular hypothalamus (Van Erp et al., 1991
), also
contributes to the induction of grooming observed in the present study.
The influence of melanocortin infusions and cocaine treatment on
locomotor activity was also examined.
-MSH infusions into the brains
of cocaine-treated rats induced a significant increase in locomotor
activity, and this activity was maintained throughout a 1-h test
period. Although cocaine alone is known to induce substantial locomotor
activity immediately after administration (Post and Rose, 1976
; Roy et
al., 1978
), we tested animals 3 h after drug treatment, when the
locomotor-activating effects are no longer exhibited (Post and Rose,
1976
). The results of the current investigation are consistent
with previous reports and demonstrate that animals receiving repeated
cocaine and then receiving an acute saline infusion (i.c.v.) 3 h
later do not exhibit locomotor activity significantly different from
the saline or
-MSH alone control groups.
-MSH itself has been
reported to induce very modest increases in locomotor activity,
primarily in hopping and rearing (Van Erp et al., 1991
). Most studies,
however, do not report any significant locomotor-activating effects of
-MSH. In fact there is a report that
-MSH infusion decreases
locomotor activity, possibly as a result of excessive grooming in these
animals (Isaacson and Green, 1978
). The results presented here on the
combined effects of cocaine and
-MSH are interesting, and indicate a
synergistic interaction that results in prolonged increases of
locomotor activation. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying
this interaction are not clear but could result from regulation of
intracellular signaling pathways in dopaminergic target neurons in the
striatum. MC4-R receptors, like D1 receptors, are
positively coupled to the cAMP pathway and could thereby enhance the
response to activation of these receptors (Gantz et al., 1993
).
The molecular and behavioral data presented in this paper further
establish a link between central melanocortin systems and cocaine and
morphine. Moreover, in a recent study we have found that blockade of
the melanocortin-MC4-R system inhibits the rewarding and
locomotor-activating effects of cocaine (Hsu et al., 2001
). Together these studies demonstrate a functional coupling of the melanocortin and dopamine neurotransmitter systems, as suggested previously (Alvaro et al., 1996
; Lindblom et al., 2000
). The
melanocortin system is also reported to play a major role in the
control of hypothalamic centers involved in the homeostatic control of
feeding (Cowley et al., 1999
), and it will be interesting to examine
the role of mesolimbic melanocortin-dopamine interactions in the more general control of such appetitive behaviors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 5, 2002.
Received for publication June 12, 2002.
This work is supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grants MH45481 and 2 P01 MH25642, a Veterans Administration National Center Grant for post-traumatic stress disorder, and the Connecticut Mental Health Center.
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.040311
Address correspondence to: Ronald S. Duman, Ph.D., Abraham Ribicoff Research Facilities, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06508. E-mail: ronald.duman{at}yale.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin;
-MSH,
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone;
SCH 23390, R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine;
MC3-R, melanocortin 3 receptor;
MC4-R, melanocortin 4 receptor;
ANOVA, analysis of variance.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
229:
21-26
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in the rat brain: evidence that
-MSH-containing cells in the arcuate region send projections to extrahypothalamic areas.
Brain Res
178:
55-67[CrossRef][Medline].
-Melanocyte stimulating hormone: immunohistochemical identification and mapping in neurons in brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
75:
6300-6304
-MSH).
Life Sci
24:
1931-1938[CrossRef][Medline].
-melanotropin induced excessive grooming: changes in dopamine activity in the nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen.
Life Sci
42:
1651-1657[CrossRef][Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. C. Benoit, D. J. Clegg, R. J. Seeley, and S. C. Woods Insulin and Leptin as Adiposity Signals Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2004; 59(1): 267 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||