Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,
University of Maryland School of Medicine (M.D.S., E.F.R.P., Y.A.,
W.P.F., W.R.R., E.X.A.), Baltimore, Maryland; Departamento de
Farmacologia Básica e Clínica, Instituto de
Ciências Biomédicas (Y.A., N.G.C., E.X.A.), and Instituto
de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho (M.D.S.), Centro de
Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
This study was designed to investigate the effects of the
cholinesterase inhibitors soman and pyridostigmine bromide (PB) on
synaptic transmission in the CA1 field of rat hippocampal slices. Soman
(1-100 nM, 10-15 min) decreased the amplitude of GABAergic postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) evoked by stimulation of Schaffer collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons. It also decreased the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous IPSCs recorded from pyramidal neurons. Whereas the maximal effect of soman on evoked GABAergic transmission was observed at 10 nM, full cholinesterase inhibition was induced by 1 nM soman. After 10-15-min exposure of
hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB, GABAergic transmission was facilitated
and cholinesterase activity was not significantly affected. At
nanomolar concentrations, soman and PB have no direct effect on
GABAA receptors. The effects of soman and PB on GABAergic transmission were inhibited by the m2
receptor antagonist 11-[[[2-diethylamino-O-methyl]-1-piperidinyl] acetyl]-5,11-dihydrol-6H-pyridol[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6- one
(1 nM) and the m3 receptor antagonist
4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine (100 nM),
respectively, and by the nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist
atropine (1 µM). Thus, changes in GABAergic transmission are likely
to result from direct interactions of soman and PB with m2 and m3
receptors, respectively, located on GABAergic fibers/neurons synapsing
onto the neurons under study. Although the effects of 1 nM soman and
100 nM PB were diametrically opposed, they only canceled one another
when PB was applied to the neurons before soman. Therefore, PB, acting
via m3 receptors, can effectively counteract effects arising from the
interactions of soman with m2 receptors in the brain.
 |
Introduction |
The
organophosphates sarin, soman, VX, and tabun are the most
powerful agents of chemical mass destruction (for review, see Reutter,
1999
). These compounds, commonly referred to as nerve agents, are
extremely toxic and their toxicity has long been attributed to their
ability to block cholinesterases irreversibly (Taylor, 1996
). The
therapeutic strategy used to prevent and/or counteract the toxic
effects of nerve agents has been designed primarily to recover
cholinesterase activity and thereby reduce manifestation of
overstimulation of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors by excessive accumulation of acetylcholine (ACh) at cholinergic synapses. However, persistence of neurological sequella despite the use of this
cholinesterase-based therapy emphasizes the significance of nerve
agents' effects on a wider range of targets (for review, see Moore,
1998
). Thus, the actions and effects of nerve agents and their
antidotes in the central nervous system (CNS) continue to be
investigated extensively.
Reportedly, doses of soman that are close to or higher than its
LD50 cause long-lasting epileptic seizure
activity that is associated with severe brain damage in rats (McLeod et
al., 1984
; Lallement et al., 1997
; McDonough and Shih, 1997
). At much
lower doses, soman induces behavioral alterations that are not
accompanied by gross histopathological changes in the brain of rats
(Sirkka et al., 1990
; Moore, 1998
; Baille et al., 2001
). The epileptic activity induced by high doses of soman in laboratory animals can be
prevented to a great extent by pretreatment with atropine (a muscarinic
receptor antagonist), pralidoxime (an oxime that reactivates
cholinesterases by removing the phosphate group bound to the esteratic
site of cholinesterases), and benzodiazepines and/or reversible
cholinesterase inhibitors that readily cross the blood-brain barrier
such as huperzine (Lennox et al., 1992
; Lallement et al., 1997
;
Carpentier et al., 2000
).
Pretreatment of rats with pyridostigmine bromide (PB), a cholinesterase
inhibitor normally included in the antidotal therapy for intoxication
by nerve agents, does not prevent seizure activity induced by high
doses of soman in rats (Lallement et al., 1997
). However, it does
improve the sensorimotor performance of rats exposed to low doses of
sarin and the cognitive impairment induced by an acute, subtoxic
treatment of rats with the organophosphate diisopropylfluorophosphate
(Stone et al., 2000
; Abou-Donia et al., 2002
). There have been no
studies directed at investigating whether PB can prevent and/or reverse
neurological alterations associated with exposure to low levels of soman.
Although the quaternary ammonium structure of PB prevents its
easy access to the brain, low levels of PB have been detected by means
of radioimmunoassay in the brain of rats treated with a single dose of
1 mg/kg PB intramuscularly (Miller and Verma, 1989
), and CNS-related
effects have been observed in laboratory animals and humans treated
with therapeutic doses of PB. These effects include enhanced CNS
arousal in humans (Borland et al., 1985
), increased startle response in
Wistar Kyoto rats (Servatius et al., 1998
), and sensorimotor
alterations that are accompanied by increases in acetylcholinesterase
activity and binding of the selective type 2 muscarinic receptor ligand
AFDX 384 in specific areas of the brain of Sprague-Dawley rats
(Abou-Donia et al., 2002
).
The present study was designed to determine the effects of soman and
low concentrations of PB on neurotransmission in the hippocampus and to
investigate possible interactions between PB and soman at the cellular
level. To this end, the whole-cell mode of the patch-clamp technique
was used to record spontaneous and field stimulation-evoked
postsynaptic currents from neurons in the CA1 pyramidal layer of rat
hippocampal slices before, during, and after their exposure to soman
and/or PB. The results presented herein demonstrate that GABAergic
transmission in the CA1 field of the hippocampus is inhibited by soman
(1-100 nM) and potentiated by PB (100 nM) and that preexposure of
hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB can effectively counteract the effects
of 1 nM soman on GABAergic transmission. Evidence is also provided that
the effects of soman and PB on GABAergic transmission are not related
to cholinesterase inhibition. Instead, they are the result of the
direct interactions of soman and PB with m2 and m3 receptors,
respectively, located on GABAergic neurons/fibers synapsing onto the
neurons under study. It is, therefore, concluded that, acting primarily
via m3 receptors, PB can prevent some of the toxic effects arising from
the interactions of soman with m2 receptors in the CNS.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Rat Hippocampal Slices.
Hippocampal slices of 250-µm
thickness were obtained from 15- to 25-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats
according to the procedure described previously (Alkondon et al.,
1999
). The slices were kept in a holding chamber containing artificial
cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) bubbled with 95% O2
and 5% CO2, at room temperature. Each slice, as
needed, was transferred to a recording chamber (capacity of 2 ml) and
held submerged by two nylon fibers. The recording chamber was
continuously perfused with bubbled ACSF, which had the following
composition: 125 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM
KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 25 mM glucose (osmolarity ~340 mOsM).
Electrophysiological Recordings.
By means of the whole-cell
mode of the patch-clamp technique, spontaneous or field
stimulation-evoked postsynaptic currents (PSCs) were recorded from
neurons of the CA1 pyramidal layer of rat hippocampal slices. Test
solutions were applied to the slices through a set of coplanar-parallel
glass tubes (400-µm i.d.) glued together and assembled on a
motor-driven system (Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA) controlled by
microcomputer. The tubes were placed at a distance of approximately 100 to 150 µm from the slice, and the gravity-driven flow rate was
adjusted to 1.0 ml/min. Each tube was connected to a different
reservoir filled with test solution. Evoked PSCs were recorded after
application of a supramaximal 20- to 60-µs electrical stimulus to
afferent fibers via a bipolar electrode made of thin platinum wires
(50-100 µm in diameter). The stimulus was delivered by an isolated
stimulator unit (Digitimer Ltd., Garden City, England) connected to a
digital-to-analog interface (TL-1 DMA; Axon Instruments, Union City,
CA). The platinum electrode was positioned at the Schaffer collaterals.
Possible changes in series resistance were detected by applying,
online, a 5-mV hyperpolarizing pulse before the test pulse.
Electrophysiological signals were recorded by means of an Axopatch 200A
(Axon Instruments), filtered at 2 kHz, and either stored on VCR tapes
or directly sampled by a microcomputer using the pClamp6 software (Axon
Instruments). Low-resistance (2-5 M
) electrodes were pulled from
borosilicate capillary glass (World Precision Instruments, New Haven,
CT) and filled with internal solution. The composition of the internal
solution used for voltage-clamp recordings from neurons in the CA1
pyramidal layer was as follows: 80 mM CsCl, 80 mM CsF, 10 mM EGTA, 22.5 mM CsOH, 10 mM HEPES, and 5 mM QX-314 (pH adjusted to 7.3 with
CsOH; 340 mOsM). All experiments were performed at room temperature
(20-22°C)
Data Analysis.
Peak amplitude, 10 to 90% rise time, and
decay-time constant of field stimulation-evoked PSCs were determined
using the pClamp6 software. Spontaneously occurring currents were
analyzed using the Continuous Data Recording software (Dempster, 1989
).
All the analyses were made on fixed 3-min recordings. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. The Student's
t test was used for pairwise comparison of results obtained
in a test group and its respective control. In addition, one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test was
used to compare results of repeated measures and multiple groups.
Cholinesterase Assay.
Cholinesterase activity was measured
by a two-phase radiotopic assay (Johnson and Russell, 1975
) using 0.788 mM [3H]ACh iodide, which was sufficient to
produce 100,000 cpm when totally hydrolyzed. The reaction (100 µl)
was terminated by addition of 100 µl of a termination mixture (1 M
monochloroacetic acid, 2 M NaCl, and 0.5 M NaOH) to which 4 ml of
scintillation mixture (10% isoamyl alcohol, 0.5% diphenyloxazole, and
0.02% dimethylphenyloxazolylbenzene in toluene) was added. The
hydrolyzed, acidified [3H]acetate partitioned
into the organic phase and was subsequently counted. All samples were
assayed in the presence of the butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor
tetraisopropylpyrophosphoramide (10
4 M).
Protein assays were performed using a micro BCA kit (Pierce Chemical,
Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer instructions. Two sets of
experiments were carried out. In one set, hippocampal slices were first
perfused for 15 min with ACSF containing no drug, 1 nM soman, or 100 nM
PB and subsequently washed three times with drug-free ACSF for 1.5 min.
Each slice was transferred to a microfuge tube containing 50 µl of
extraction buffer (pH 7.4; 1 M NaCl, 0.019 M
NaH2PO4 · H2O,
0.081 M NaHPO4 · 7H2O,
and 1% Triton X-100) and snap frozen. Cells within the slices
were lysed by five rounds of freeze-thaw, lasting approximately 5 min,
and homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4°C. Cholinesterase activity measured in the supernatant was normalized to the protein contents of the pellets. In the other set of experiments, hippocampal slices were first extracted as described above and cholinesterase activity was measured in the supernatants after 0-, 15-, 30-, and
60-min exposure to 100 nM PB.
Drugs and Biological Hazards.
Soman (1,2,2-trimethylpropyl
methylphosphonofloridate) was obtained from the U.S. Army Medical
Research and Development Command. Atropine sulfate, PB,
6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV), picrotoxin, and
4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine (4-DAMP)
methiodide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
11-[[[2-Diethylamino-O-methyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydrol-6H-pyridol[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one (AFDX-116) was purchased from Tocris Cookson (St. Louis, MO). Methyllycaconitine (MLA) citrate was a gift from Prof. M. H. Benn (Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada). Dihydro-
-erythroidine (DH
E) hydrobromide was a
gift from Merck (Rahway, NJ). A 250 mM stock solution of picrotoxin was
made in dimethyl sulfoxide, and dilutions were made in the ACSF.
NaOH was used to dissolve CNQX and APV (the 10 mM stock solution
of CNQX had 12.5 mM NaOH and the 50 mM stock solution of APV had 0.5 M
of NaOH). [3H]ACh iodide (specific activity 55 mCi/mmol) was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA).
Safe handling of organophosphates was assured according to U.S. Army
Medical Research and Development Command's recommendations. The
compounds were stored at
80°C and diluted daily in an
organophosphate vapor-proof hood. All organophosphate- and/or
tetrodotoxin-containing solutions were inactivated with 5% sodium
hypochlorite. Latex gloves and proper goggles were used throughout the experiment.
 |
Results |
Characteristics of EPSCs and IPSCs Evoked by Field Stimulation of
Schaffer Collaterals and Recorded from Neurons in the CA1 Pyramidal
Layer of Rat Hippocampal Slices.
Application of a supramaximal
stimulus to Schaffer collaterals in the stratum radiatum in the CA1
hippocampal field via a bipolar platinum electrode generated PSCs that
could be recorded from the CA1 pyramidal neurons. The finding that
these currents were blocked after perfusion of the slices with ACSF
containing the GABA type A receptor antagonist picrotoxin (100 µM)
and the glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX (20 µM) and APV (50 µM)
indicated that they were mediated by GABA or glutamate released from
field-stimulated fibers onto the neurons under study. Using these
receptor antagonists, IPSCs and EPSCs were pharmacologically isolated.
Evoked IPSCs were recorded from neurons in slices that were
continuously perfused with ACSF containing 20 µM CNQX and 50 µM
APV. On the other hand, evoked EPSCs were recorded from neurons in
hippocampal slices continuously perfused with ACSF containing 100 µM
picrotoxin. Under control conditions, evoked IPSCs or EPSCs recorded
from a single neuron had variable amplitudes. However, up to 20 min, field stimulation-evoked IPSCs or EPSCs did not show any significant rundown (Fig. 1). In most experiments,
recordings under control conditions lasted 3 to 5 min, after which time
a given drug was applied to the hippocampal slice via the multibarrel
perfusion system. In this system, solutions were exchanged within 20 to 25 s, as determined by the 4-aminopyridine-induced enhancement of
the amplitudes of evoked PSCs.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Time-dependent changes in the amplitudes of EPSCs and
IPSCs evoked by stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals and recorded
from CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. Plot of the
amplitudes of IPSCs and EPSCs evoked by field stimulation of the
Schaffer collaterals at 0.2 Hz and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons
versus recording time. Recordings of IPSCs were obtained from a neuron
in a hippocampal slice continuously perfused with ACSF containing the
glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX (20 µM) and APV (50 µM),
whereas recordings of EPSCs were obtained from a neuron in another
slice perfused with ACSF containing the GABAA receptor
antagonist picrotoxin (100 µM). Holding potential, 60 mV.
|
|
Effects of Soman on IPSCs and EPSCs Evoked by Field Stimulation of
Schaffer Collaterals and Recorded from CA1 Neurons in Hippocampal
Slices.
Perfusion of hippocampal slices with ACSF containing soman
(0.1-100 nM) resulted in a significant reduction of the amplitudes of
evoked IPSCs recorded from neurons in the CA1 pyramidal layer (Fig.
2A). The effect was
concentration-dependent; it was statistically significant at 1 nM and
reached its maximum at 10 nM (Fig. 2B). Inhibition of evoked IPSCs
became apparent at 1 min after beginning of the perfusion of the slices
with soman-containing ACSF. In addition, the effect of soman on evoked
IPSCs was not fully reversed even after 10 min of washing the
preparations with soman-free ACSF (Fig. 2A). The kinetics of evoked
IPSCs was not significantly altered by 1 to 100 nM soman. The rise
times of evoked IPSCs recorded under control conditions and in the
presence of 100 nM soman were 4.54 ± 0.63 and 4.86 ± 0.23 ms, respectively (n = 3 neurons, each from a different
slice). Likewise, the decay-time constants of the currents recorded in
the absence and in the presence of 100 nM soman were 71.7 ± 1.43 and 66.86 ± 7.66 ms, respectively (n = 3 neurons,
each from a different slice).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Soman reduces the amplitude of IPSCs evoked by field
stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal
neurons in rat hippocampal slices. A, representative recording samples
of evoked IPSCs obtained 1) under control conditions; 2) in the
presence of 0.1, 1, or 10 nM soman; and 3) after 10-min washing of the
slices with soman-free ACSF. The neurons were exposed for 10 min to
soman. All experiments were carried out in the presence of 20 µM CNQX
and 50 µM APV. Membrane potential, 60 mV. B,
concentration-dependent effect of soman on evoked IPSCs. Each
concentration was tested on a slice that had not been previously
exposed to soman. The amplitudes of events evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged amplitude of 45 events
recorded in the absence of soman was taken as 100% and used to
normalize the averaged amplitude of events recorded at the same
frequency for 3 min in the presence of the organophosphate. Graph and
error bars represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained
from four neurons. According to the unpaired Student's
t test, results are significantly different from control
with *, p < 0.05 or **,
p < 0.01.
|
|
Perfusion of hippocampal slices with ACSF containing soman up to 50 nM
resulted in no changes in the amplitudes (Fig.
3, A and B) or kinetics of evoked EPSCs.
The rise times of evoked EPSCs recorded from hippocampal neurons before
and during their exposure to 50 nM soman were 5.47 ± 0.56 and
5.74 ± 0.40 ms, respectively (n = 4 neurons, each
from a different slice). Similarly, the decay-time constants of evoked
EPSCs recorded from hippocampal neurons in the absence and in the
presence of 50 nM soman were 107.46 ± 4.70 and 114.66 ± 8.06 ms, respectively (n = 4 neurons, each from a different slice).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
EPSCs evoked by field stimulation of the Schaffer
collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons are not affected by
soman. A, representative recording samples of evoked EPSCs
obtained from neurons before (left traces) and during exposure to 1 and
50 nM soman (right traces). All experiments were carried out in the
presence of 100 µM picrotoxin. Membrane potential, 60 mV. B,
quantitative analysis of the effect of soman on evoked EPSCs. Each
concentration was tested on a neuron that had not been previously
exposed to soman. The amplitudes of events evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged amplitude of 45 events
recorded under control condition was taken as 100% and used to
normalize the averaged amplitude of events recorded at the same
frequency for 3 min in the presence of the drug. Each column and error
bar represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from
four neurons.
|
|
Effects of Soman on Spontaneously Occurring IPSCs and Miniature
IPSCs and EPSCs Recorded from Neurons in the CA1 Pyramidal Layer of
Hippocampal Slices.
In the absence of the
Na+-channel blocker tetrodotoxin and in the
continuous presence of the glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX (20 µM) and APV (50 µM), spontaneously occurring IPSCs were recorded
from neurons in the pyramidal layer of the CA1 field of hippocampal
slices. When the Schaffer collaterals were not stimulated, 0.1 and 1 nM
soman caused no significant changes in the frequency, amplitude, or
kinetics of the spontaneously occurring IPSCs (Fig.
4A). Only at 100 nM did soman cause
significant reduction of the peak amplitude and frequency of these
events (Fig. 4A). In contrast, soman at 1 or 10 nM caused a significant
reduction in the amplitudes of spontaneous IPSCs recorded from CA1
pyramidal neurons between two subsequent field stimuli applied to
Schaffer collaterals (Fig. 4B). The frequency of spontaneous IPSCs
recorded under the latter experimental condition was also significantly decreased by 10 nM soman (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Soman decreases the amplitude and frequency of
spontaneously occurring IPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in
rat hippocampal slices. A, quantitative analysis of the effects of
soman on rise time, decay-time constant, amplitude, and frequency of
spontaneous IPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in slices where
the Schaffer collaterals had not been field stimulated. The average
rise time and decay-time constant of spontaneous IPSCs recorded for 3 min from neurons before their exposure to soman were 2.5 ± 0.55 and 7.5 ± 1.44 ms, respectively. B, quantitative analysis of the
effects of soman on rise time, decay-time constant, amplitude, and
frequency of spontaneous IPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in
slices where the Schaffer collaterals were stimulated at 0.2 Hz. The
average rise time and decay-time constant of spontaneous IPSCs recorded
for 3 min under control conditions were 2.03 ± 0.39 and 8.16 ± 1.73 ms, respectively. Values of average rise time, average
decay-time constant, average amplitude, and frequency of events
recorded from a neuron in the presence of a given concentration of
soman are expressed as percentage of the values obtained before
exposure of that neuron to soman. In the graphs, each column and error
bar represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from
five neurons. Holding potential, 60 mV. According to the unpaired
Student's t test, results are significantly different
from control with *, p < 0.05.
|
|
A 10-min exposure of hippocampal slices to 50 nM soman did not result
in any significant change in the amplitude, kinetics, or frequency of
miniature IPSCs recorded from CA1 neurons that were continuously
perfused with ACSF containing 300 nM tetrodotoxin in addition to the
glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX and APV (Table
1). A previous study had shown that at
high concentrations (2 µM) soman also has no effect on miniature
IPSCs (Chebabo et al., 1999
). These results demonstrate that soman (up
to 2 µM) does not alter the activity of postsynaptic
GABAA receptors and suggest that soman-induced
block of GABAergic transmission is the result of a presynaptic
mechanism of action.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Soman has no significant effect on miniature IPSCs and EPSCs recorded
from CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices
The values of average rise time, decay-time constant, and peak
amplitude and the frequency of events recorded from a given neuron for
3 min in the presence of 50 nM soman are represented as percentage of
the values determined for events recorded from that neuron for 3 min
under control conditions. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. of
results obtained from four to six neurons, each from a different slice.
|
|
In addition to being unable to alter evoked glutamatergic transmission,
soman also had no significant effect on tetrodotoxin-insensitive glutamatergic transmission. At 50 nM, soman did not alter the amplitude, kinetics, or frequency of miniature EPSCs recorded from CA1
pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices that were continuously perfused
with ASCF containing 300 nM tetrodotoxin in addition to picrotoxin
(Table 1).
Effects of the Nonselective Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist Atropine
and of Nicotinic Receptor Antagonists on Soman-Induced Inhibition of
Evoked IPSCs in Hippocampal Slices.
In an attempt to elucidate the
mechanisms underlying the effect of soman on evoked IPSCs, the
following facts were taken into account: 1) nicotinic and muscarinic
receptors are known to modulate GABA release from hippocampal neurons
(Pitler and Alger, 1994
; Alkondon et al., 1999
); 2) organophosphates,
via cholinesterase inhibition, can indirectly alter the activity of
muscarinic and nicotinic receptors; and 3) organophosphates can
interact directly with different subtypes of nicotinic and muscarinic
receptors (Albuquerque et al., 1988
; Lockhart et al., 2001
).
Exposure of hippocampal slices to the nonselective muscarinic receptor
antagonist atropine (1 nM) had no significant effect on the amplitude
of evoked IPSCs. However, it prevented soman from reducing the
amplitudes of evoked IPSCs recorded from neurons in the CA1 field of
hippocampal slices (Fig. 5A). Perfusion
of hippocampal slices with ACSF containing 50 nM MLA, a selective
7
nAChR antagonist, and DH
E, a nicotinic antagonist that at the
concentration tested (10 µM) would have blocked by 40 and 90%,
respectively, the activity of
7 and
4
2 nAChRs, caused no
significant alteration in the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs. However, in
the continuous presence of the nAChR antagonists, soman was still
capable of reducing the amplitude of the evoked IPSCs (Fig. 5B). In the
presence of the nAChR antagonists, the magnitude of soman-induced
reduction of the IPSC amplitudes was about the same as that observed
under control conditions (Figs. 2B and 5B). Taken together, these
results suggest that the effect of soman on GABAergic transmission is
mediated by its interaction with muscarinic receptors present on
GABAergic axons/terminals synapsing onto the neurons from which
recordings were obtained.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of the muscarinic receptor antagonist
atropine and the nAChR antagonists MLA and DH E on soman-induced
inhibition of evoked IPSCs in rat hippocampal slices. A, quantitative
analysis of the effect of atropine on evoked IPSCs and on soman-induced
inhibition of evoked IPSCs. Evoked IPSCs were recorded from CA1
pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices that were exposed first to 1 nM
atropine for 5 to 8 min and subsequently to the admixture of 1 nM
atropine plus 1 nM soman for an additional 10 min. At the end of the
experiments, the preparations were washed for 10 min with drug-free
ACSF. The amplitudes of events evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged amplitudes of events recorded in the
presence of atropine or atropine plus soman and in the washing phase
are expressed as percentage of the averaged amplitudes of events
recorded at the same frequency for 3 min before exposure of the neurons
to any drug. B, quantitative analysis of the effect of MLA and DH E
on evoked IPSCs and on soman-induced inhibition of evoked IPSCs. Evoked
IPSCs were recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices
that were exposed first to 50 nM MLA plus 10 µM DH E for 5 to 8 min
and subsequently to the admixture of the antagonists and 1 nM soman for
an additional 10 min. At the end of the experiments, the preparations
were washed for 10 min with drug-free ACSF. The amplitudes of events
evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged
amplitudes of events recorded in the presence of drugs and in the
washing phase are expressed as percentage of the averaged amplitudes of
events recorded at the same frequency for 3 min under control
conditions. In the graphs, each column and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from four neurons. All
experiments were carried out in the presence of CNQX and APV. Holding
potential, 60 mV. According to the unpaired Student's
t test, results are significantly different from control
with *, p < 0.05.
|
|
Effects of PB on IPSCs and EPSCs Evoked by Field Stimulation of the
Schaffer Collaterals and Recorded from CA1 Neurons in the Pyramidal
Layer of Hippocampal Slices.
In the continuous presence of CNQX
and APV, perfusion of hippocampal slices with ACSF containing PB
increased the amplitude of IPSCs evoked by field stimulation of
Schaffer collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons (Fig.
6, A and C). This effect, which was
apparent at 100 nM and became negligible at 1 µM PB (Fig. 6C), was
completely reversed after 10 min of washing the preparations with
PB-free ACSF (Fig. 6A). In contrast, perfusion of hippocampal slices
with ACSF containing PB (30 nM-1 µM) resulted in no change in the
amplitude of evoked EPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in the
continuous presence of 100 µM picrotoxin (Fig. 6, B and C).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PB increases the amplitude of IPSCs and does alter
the amplitude of EPSCs evoked by field stimulation of the Schaffer
collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal
slices. A and B, sample recordings of evoked IPSCs (A) and EPSCs (B)
obtained from two neurons under control conditions, in the presence of
100 nM PB and after 10 min of washing of the preparations with PB-free
ACSF. The neurons were exposed to PB for 10 min. Evoked IPSCs were
recorded in the presence of 20 µM CNQX and 50 µM APV, and evoked
EPSCs were recorded in the presence of 100 µM picrotoxin. Holding
potential, 60 mV. C, graph of PB concentrations versus the amplitudes
of evoked EPSCs or IPSCs normalized to control conditions. The
amplitudes of EPSCs or IPSCs evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min
were averaged. The averaged amplitudes of events recorded in the
presence of PB are expressed as percentage of the averaged amplitudes
of events recorded at the same frequency for 3 min under control
conditions. Each concentration was tested on a neuron that had not been
previously exposed to PB. Each point and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from four neurons. According
to the unpaired Student's t test, results are different
from control with *, p < 0.05.
|
|
Effects of Atropine on PB-Induced Potentiation of Field
Stimulation-Evoked IPSCs in the CA1 Layer of Hippocampal Slices.
As aforementioned, exposure of hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB resulted
in the enhancement of the amplitudes of IPSCs evoked by field
stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals and recorded from neurons in
the CA1 pyramidal layer of hippocampal slices. The effect reached its
maximum at 30 to 60 s after beginning of the perfusion of the
slices with PB-containing ACSF, remained constant for as long as the
drug was present, i.e., 5 to 8 min (Fig.
7, A and B), and was blocked by
subsequent exposure of the slices to ACSF containing 1 nM atropine
(Fig. 7, A and C).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Atropine blocks PB-induced potentiation of
IPSCs evoked by field stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals and
recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons. A and B, amplitudes of IPSCs
evoked at 0.2 Hz and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons under
different experimental conditions. In A, recordings were obtained from
a neuron in the following sequence: 1) under control condition, 2) in
the presence of 100 nM PB, 3) in the presence of 100 nM PB and 1 nM
atropine, and 4) during the washout with drug-free ACSF. The
experimental results shown in B were obtained from another neuron
subjected to the same treatment as that described in A, except that the
concentration of atropine was 100 nM. C and D, quantitative analyses of
the effects of 1 nM (C) and 100 nM (D) atropine on PB-induced
potentiation of evoked IPSCs. The amplitudes of IPSCs evoked at a
frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged amplitudes of
events recorded from a given neuron in the presence of PB or atropine
plus PB and during the washing phase are expressed as percentage of the
averaged amplitudes of events recorded at the same frequency for 3 min
under control conditions. Each column and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from five neurons. All
experiments were carried out in the presence of the glutamate receptor
antagonists 20 µM CNQX and 50 µM APV. Holding potential, 60 mV.
According to the ANOVA test, peak amplitudes of IPSCs recorded in the
presence of PB before exposure of the neurons to 1 nM (C) or 100 nM
atropine (D) are significantly different from control with **,
p < 0.01. In addition, peak amplitudes of IPSCs
recorded in the presence of 100 nM PB plus 100 nM atropine and after
washout of both drugs are significantly different from control with
*, p < 0.05. Finally, amplitudes of events
recorded during exposure of neurons to PB plus atropine and after
removal of both drugs were significantly different from those recorded
in the presence of PB alone with **, p < 0.01.
|
|
In the presence of 100 nM atropine, not only was PB devoid of any
effect on evoked IPSCs but also the amplitude of evoked IPSCs became
smaller than those of events recorded under control conditions (Fig.
7, B and D). Furthermore, even after 10 min of washing of the preparations with drug
free-ACSF, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs remained smaller than those
of events recorded before exposure of the slices to PB and atropine
(each at 100 nM) (Fig. 7, B and D). An earlier report had
demonstrated that at concentrations
100 nM atropine alone can
reduce the amplitude of evoked IPSCs (Chebabo et al., 1999
).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Atropine blocks PB-induced increases in the amplitude
and frequency of spontaneous IPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons
in hippocampal slices where the Schaffer collaterals were stimulated at
0.2 Hz. A, quantitative analyses of the effects of various
concentrations of PB on the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous
IPSCs. The frequency and average amplitude of IPSCs recorded for 3 min
in the presence of PB are expressed as percentage of the frequency and
average amplitude of events recorded under control condition. Each
concentration was tested on a neuron that had not been previously
exposed to PB. Each point and error bar represent mean and S.E.M.,
respectively, of results obtained from four neurons. Results are
significantly different from those obtained under control conditions;
*, p < 0.05 according to the unpaired Student's
t test. B, analyses of the effects of atropine on
PB-induced increase in the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous
IPSCs. The neurons were first exposed to 100 nM PB for 5 to 8 min and
subsequently to 100 nM PB plus 1 nM atropine. After this treatment, the
neurons were perfused for 10 min with ACSF containing only PB and for
an additional 10 min with ACSF containing no atropine or PB. The
frequency and average amplitude of IPSCs recorded for 3 min under each
experimental condition are expressed as percentage of the frequency and
average amplitude of events recorded under control condition. Each
graph and error bar represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results
obtained from four neurons. Results were significantly different from
those obtained under control conditions; *, p < 0.05 according to the unpaired Student's t test.
|
|
Effects of PB on Spontaneously Occurring IPSCs Recorded from CA1
Pyramidal Neurons in Rat Hippocampal Slices: Blockade by Atropine.
In the continuous presence of the glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX
and APV, spontaneously occurring IPSCs were recorded from CA1 pyramidal
neurons in slices where the Schaffer collaterals had not been subjected
to field stimulation. At 1 and 30 nM, PB had no apparent effect on
the amplitude or frequency of spontaneously occurring IPSCs (Fig.
8A). At 100 nM, PB caused a small, albeit significant, enhancement
in the frequency and amplitude of these events. These effects became
negligible as concentration of PB was increased to 1 µM (Fig. 8A). PB
(100 nM)-induced increase in the frequency and amplitudes of
spontaneously occurring IPSCs started at 30 s after beginning of
perfusion of the hippocampal slices with PB-containing ACSF and was
fully reversed after 10 min of washing the slices with PB-free ACSF. In
addition, PB at all concentrations tested caused no significant change
on the decay-time constants of spontaneously occurring IPSCs (data not shown).
Field stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals did not alter
significantly the magnitude of the effects of 100 nM PB on
spontaneously occurring IPSCs. In the presence of 100 nM PB, the
amplitude and frequency of spontaneously occurring IPSCs recorded
between subsequent field stimuli applied to the Schaffer collaterals
were, respectively, 18.8 ± 5.3 and 24.7 ± 11.3% larger
than those recorded under control conditions (n = 3 neurons, each from a different slice). These results were not
statistically different from those obtained from slices in which the
Schaffer collaterals had not been field stimulated. In these
preparations, 100 nM PB increased by 20.0 ± 5.0 and 6.5 ± 1.0%, respectively, the frequency and amplitude of spontaneously occurring IPSCs (Fig. 8A).
Perfusion of the hippocampal slices with ACSF containing 1 nM atropine
in addition to 100 nM PB resulted in inhibition of the effects of the
carbamate on spontaneously occurring IPSCs (Fig. 8B). Atropine-induced
inhibition of the effects of PB on frequency and amplitude of IPSCs
could not be reversed, even after 10 min of washing of the preparations
with atropine-free ACSF (Fig. 8B). Furthermore, at 1 nM atropine itself
had no effect on spontaneously occurring IPSCs as evidenced by the
finding that after an additional 10 min of washing of the hippocampal
slices with drug-free ACSF, the frequency and amplitude of these events were similar to those recorded before exposure of the preparations to
any drug (Fig. 8B).
Effects of the Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists 4-DAMP and AFDX-116
on Soman-Induced Inhibition and PB-Induced Potentiation of GABAergic
Transmission in Rat Hippocampal Slices.
Numerous reports have
indicated that PB and soman can interact directly with m2 and m3
receptors (Silveira et al., 1990
; McBride et al., 1991
; Ramnarine et
al., 1996
; Shibata et al., 1998
; Lockhart et al., 2001
). Thus, the m2-
and m3-preferring antagonists AFDX-116 and 4-DAMP, respectively, were
used in an attempt to identify the muscarinic receptor subtype
underlying the effects of PB and soman on GABAergic transmission.
Perfusion of hippocampal slices with ACSF containing 100 nM
4-DAMP caused a small, albeit significant reduction of the amplitude of
IPSCs evoked by field stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals and
recorded from pyramidal neurons in the CA1 field (Fig.
9, A and B). This finding suggested that
m3 receptors in GABAergic fibers synapsing onto the studied neurons
are tonically active and facilitate GABAergic transmission. The
inhibitory effect of 1 nM soman on GABAergic transmission could be
detected even in the presence of 4-DAMP (Fig. 9A). On the other hand,
in the continuous presence of 4-DAMP, 100 nM PB was unable to
facilitate GABAergic transmission between Schaffer collaterals and CA1
pyramidal neurons (Fig. 9B). In three of four cells continuously
perfused with ACSF containing 4-DAMP, 100 nM PB caused a small, albeit
significant reduction in the amplitude of field stimulation-evoked
IPSCs; in these cells, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs recorded in the presence of 4-DAMP alone and in the presence of PB plus 4-DAMP were
88.3 ± 2.5 and 72.6 ± 6.6%, respectively, of those
recorded under control conditions (the results are significantly
different from each other according to the ANOVA test;
p < 0.05).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effects of AFDX-116 and 4-DAMP on soman-induced
inhibition and PB-induced potentiation of evoked GABAergic transmission
in hippocampal slices. A, quantitative analysis of the effects of the
m3 receptor-preferring antagonist 4-DAMP and of the m2
receptor-preferring antagonist AFDX-116 on evoked IPSCs and on
soman-induced inhibition of evoked IPSCs. Evoked IPSCs were recorded
from CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices that were exposed
first to 100 nM 4-DAMP for 5 to 8 min and subsequently to the admixture
of 100 nM 4-DAMP plus 1 nM soman for an additional 10 min. The same
protocol was carried out using AFDX-116 instead of 4-DAMP. At the end
of the experiments, the preparations were washed for 10 min with
drug-free ACSF. The amplitudes of events evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged amplitudes of events recorded
in the presence of a muscarinic receptor antagonist or that antagonist
plus soman are expressed as percentage of the averaged amplitudes of
events recorded at the same frequency for 3 min before exposure of the
neurons to any drug. Each graph and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from three to six
experiments. The amplitudes of currents recorded in the presence of
4-DAMP or 4-DAMP plus soman were significantly smaller than those
recorded under control conditions; *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01 according to the ANOVA test.
In addition, the amplitudes of events recorded in the presence of
4-DAMP plus soman were significantly different from those recorded in
the presence of 4-DAMP; *, p < 0.05 according to
the ANOVA test. B, quantitative analysis of the effects of the m3
receptor-preferring antagonist 4-DAMP and of the m2 receptor-preferring
antagonist AFDX-116 on evoked IPSCs and on PB-induced potentiation of
evoked IPSCs. The analysis is similar to that described in A. Each
graph and error bar represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results
obtained from three to six experiments. Amplitudes of events recorded
in the presence of 4-DAMP, 4-DAMP plus PB, and AFDX-116 plus PB were
significantly different from those recorded under control conditions;
*, p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 according to the ANOVA test.
|
|
The m2 receptor-preferring antagonist AFDX-116 exerted an apparent
biphasic effect on GABAergic transmission between Schaffer collaterals
and CA1 pyramidal neurons. The amplitudes of evoked IPSCs recorded from
three neurons exposed to 1 nM AFDX-116 were very similar to those
recorded under control conditions, whereas the amplitudes of evoked
IPSCs recorded from three other neurons that had been exposed to 1 nM
AFDX-116 were slightly, albeit significantly larger than those recorded
in the absence of the drug. On average, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs
recorded from the six neurons that had been exposed to 1 nM AFDX-116
were not significantly different from those recorded under control
conditions (Fig. 9B). Inhibition of evoked IPSCs by AFDX-116 became
significant at 100 nM; the amplitudes of IPSCs recorded in the presence
of 100 nM AFDX-116 were 82.1 ± 3.1% of those recorded under
control conditions (n = 3 neurons, each from a
different slice; p < 0.01 according to the ANOVA
test). Considering that activation of m2 receptors presynaptically located in GABAergic fibers/neurons inhibits GABAergic transmission in
the hippocampus (Pitler and Alger, 1992
), the potentiating effect of 1 nM AFDX-116 on GABAergic transmission can be the result of the blockade
of tonically active m2 receptors in GABAergic fibers synapsing onto the
neurons under study. The inhibition of transmission observed at higher
concentrations of AFDX-116 may be accounted for by nonselective
blockade of other muscarinic receptor subtypes, including m3 receptors,
counteracting and prevailing over the blockade of tonically active m2
receptors. Soman was unable to inhibit GABAergic transmission between
Schaffer collaterals and CA1 pyramidal neurons in the presence of 1 nM
AFDX-116 (data not shown) and 10 nM AFDX-116 (Fig. 9A). On the other
hand, PB-induced increase in the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs could be
detected in the continuous presence of 1 nM AFDX-116 (Fig. 9B).
Interactive Effects of PB and Soman on Evoked IPSCs Recorded
from CA1 Neurons in the Pyramidal Layer of Rat Hippocampal Slices.
The results presented herein demonstrate that whereas PB
facilitates, soman inhibits GABAergic transmission between the Schaffer collaterals and CA1 neurons in the pyramidal layer of rat hippocampal slices. Reduction of the GABAergic tone in the hippocampus can underlie
the proconvulsant effects of soman in animals and humans. Numerous studies have indicated that the effectiveness of PB as part of
the antidotal regimen against poisoning by organophosphates is only
evident when PB is administered before exposure to the toxicant. Thus,
GABAergic transmission was analyzed in hippocampal slices that were
exposed first to PB and subsequently to soman and in slices that were
exposed first to soman and subsequently to PB. All the results
described below were obtained from hippocampal slices in which the
Schaffer collaterals had been subjected to field stimulation.
A 10-min exposure of hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB resulted in
a 20% enhancement of the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs. Upon subsequent
perfusion of the slices with ACSF containing both 100 nM PB and 1 nM
soman, the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs were similar to those of evoked
IPSCs recorded under control conditions (Fig. 10A). In slices preexposed to 100 nM
PB, the inhibitory effect of increasing concentrations of soman
eventually outweighed the potentiating effect of PB on GABAergic
transmission. Nevertheless, the reduction of the amplitudes of evoked
IPSCs (to below control levels) was smaller than that observed in
slices that had not been preexposed to PB (Fig. 10B). However, when
slices were first perfused with ACSF containing 1 nM soman and a 20%
reduction in the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs recorded from CA1 neurons
in response to field stimulation of the Schaffer collaterals was
observed, subsequent exposure of the preparations to the
admixture of 100 nM PB and 1 nM soman caused no further changes in
GABAergic transmission (Fig. 10C).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Preexposure of the hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB
masks the inhibitory effect of soman on evoked IPSCs. A, quantitative
analyses of the effects of soman on evoked IPSCs recorded in the
continuous presence of 100 or 300 nM PB. The IPSCs were recorded from
hippocampal slices that were exposed first to 100 nM PB, subsequently
to 1, 3, or 10 nM soman plus 100 nM PB, and finally to PB alone. In
another set of experiments, IPSCs were recorded from neurons that were
exposed first to 300 nM PB and subsequently to 300 nM PB plus 3 or 10 nM soman. Each perfusion lasted 5 to 8 min. The amplitudes of IPSCs
evoked at a frequency of 0.2 Hz for 3 min were averaged. The averaged
amplitudes of events recorded from a given neuron in the presence of
the test compounds are expressed as percentage of the averaged
amplitudes of events recorded at the same frequency for 3 min under
control conditions. Each column and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from three neurons. B,
comparison of the effects of 1 and 10 nM soman on evoked IPSCs recorded
from slices that were not preexposed to 100 nM PB and from slices that
had been preexposed for 5 to 8 min to 100 nM PB. Data were extracted
from Figs. 2B and 10A to allow mutual comparison. C, inhibitory effect
of soman on evoked IPSCs was unaltered when hippocampal slices were
first exposed to 1 nM soman and subsequently to 1 nM soman plus 100 nM
PB. Soman-induced inhibition of IPSCs remained after 10-min washing of
the preparations with drug-free ACSF solution. Analyses of the results
were done according to the protocol described in A. Each graph and
error bar represent mean and S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained
from four neurons. All experiments were carried out in the presence of
20 µM CNQX and 50 µM APV. Holding potential, 60 mV. Wherever
indicated in the graphs of A, B, and C, amplitudes of events recorded
in the presence of a given drug were significantly different from those
of events recorded under control conditions; *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01, according to the
unpaired Student's t test.
|
|
Soman-induced reduction of the peak amplitude and frequency of
spontaneously occurring IPSCs below control levels was also significantly smaller in slices that were preexposed for 10 min to 100 nM PB than in slices that had not been preexposed to PB (Fig.
11A). In slices that were preexposed
for 10 min with a PB concentration that had no effect on spontaneous
IPSCs, i.e., 300 nM, the magnitude of the reduction of the amplitude
and frequency of these events by 10 nM soman was comparable to that
observed in preparations that had not been preexposed to 300 nM PB
(Figs. 4B and 11B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Preexposure of the hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB
masks the inhibitory effect of soman on spontaneous IPSCs recorded from
CA1 neurons in hippocampal slices where the Schaffer collaterals were
stimulated at 0.2 Hz. A, quantitative analyses of spontaneous IPSCs
recorded from hippocampal slices exposed first to 100 nM PB and
subsequently to 3 and 10 nM soman plus 100 nM PB and to 100 nM PB
alone. B, analysis of results obtained using 300 nM in the same
experimental protocol as that described in A. Each perfusion lasted 5 to 8 min. In A and B, the frequency and average amplitude of IPSCs
recorded for 3 min in the presence of the test compounds are expressed
as percentage of the frequency and average amplitude of events recorded
under control condition. Each point and error bar represent mean and
S.E.M., respectively, of results obtained from four neurons. Wherever
indicated in A and B, results obtained during a given treatment were
significantly different from those obtained under control conditions;
*, p < 0.05 according to the unpaired Student's
t test.
|
|
Cholinesterase Activity in Hippocampal Slices Exposed to Soman or
PB.
A radiometric assay was used to determine the extent to which
cholinesterase activity was affected after exposure of hippocampal slices to 1 nM soman or 100 nM PB. Cholinesterase activity in intact
slices that had been exposed for 15 min to 1 nM soman was approximately
99.5% lower than that measured in untreated slices (Table
2). On the other hand, cholinesterase
activity in intact slices that had been exposed to 100 nM PB was
similar to that measured in untreated slices (Table 2). When added to
homogenates of hippocampal slices, 100 nM PB caused a time-dependent
inhibition of cholinesterase. The cholinesterase activity in
homogenates that were incubated with 100 nM PB for 15, 30, and 60 min
was 68.5 ± 3.2, 56.3 ± 3.1, and 40.9 ± 1.8%,
respectively, of that measured in control homogenates (mean ± S.D., n = 3 slices). The lack of inhibition of
cholinesterase in intact hippocampal slices exposed for 15 min to PB is
likely due to the difficult penetration of PB into the slices.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Effects of soman and PB on cholinesterase activity in intact
hippocampal slices
Data are presented as mean ± S.D. of results obtained from three
hippocampal slices taken from the brain of different rats.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The present study demonstrates that the nerve agent soman and the
carbamate PB at clinically relevant concentrations selectively affect
GABAergic transmission between the Schaffer collaterals and CA1
pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. Although sparing
glutamatergic transmission, 1 to 100 nM soman inhibits and 100 nM PB
facilitates GABAergic transmission. As discussed hereafter, the effects
of both agents are the result of their direct interactions with
different muscarinic receptors present on GABAergic axons/terminals
synapsing onto the neurons from which recordings were obtained and
correlate well with their reported behavioral effects.
Mechanism of Action Underlying the Effects of Soman and PB on
GABAergic Transmission in Rat Hippocampal Slices.
At 1, 10, and
100 nM, soman reduced by approximately 20, 35, and 36%, respectively,
the amplitude of IPSCs evoked by field stimulation of Schaffer
collaterals and recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons. Soman also
decreased the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous IPSCs recorded
from CA1 pyramidal neurons. In contrast, PB potentiated evoked and
spontaneous GABAergic transmission in the CA1 field of hippocampal
slices; these effects were evident at 100 nM and became negligible at
300 nM PB. Whereas the effects of soman on GABAergic transmission
could not be reversed during washout, those of PB were promptly
reversed. The finding that soman had no effect on the amplitude or
kinetics of miniature IPSCs and the fact that only at
3 µM can
soman or PB interact directly with GABAA
receptors (Gant et al., 1987
; Swanson et al., 1997
) indicate that
soman-induced inhibition and PB-induced potentiation of GABAergic
transmission result from presynaptic actions of the drugs.
Cholinergic mechanisms regulating synaptic transmission in the
CNS are mediated by ligand-gated nAChRs and metabotropic muscarinic receptors (Table 3). Different nAChR
subtypes regulate synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. In general,
activation of
4
2 and
7 nAChRs in GABAergic fibers/neurons
facilitates spontaneous and inhibits evoked release of
GABA (Alkondon et al., 1999
, 2000
; Radcliffe et al., 1999
),
whereas activation of
7 and
3
4 nAChRs in glutamatergic
fibers/neurons facilitates glutamate release (Radcliffe et al., 1999
;
Alkondon and Albuquerque, 2002
). In the hippocampus, m1 and m3
receptors have been detected in pyramidal neurons and in a small
population of interneurons, whereas m2 receptors have been found
predominantly in interneurons (Levey et al., 1995
; Hájos et al.,
1998
). Activation of m1 or m3 receptors in interneurons increases
GABAergic activity impinging onto CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal
slices (Martin and Alger, 1999
). On the other hand, activation of m2
receptors decreases GABAergic activity impinging onto the perisomatic
region of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampus (Pitler and
Alger, 1992
; Hájos et al., 1998
). Muscarinic agonists also
inhibit glutamatergic transmission between the Schaffer collaterals and
CA1 pyramidal neurons; this effect has been attributed to activation of
m1 receptors in glutamatergic fibers (Sheridan and Sutor, 1990
).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Cholinergic modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive GABAergic and
glutamatergic transmissions in rat hippocampal slices
|
|
The effects of soman and PB on GABAergic transmission cannot be solely
explained by increased ACh concentration arising from cholinesterase
inhibition. First, the maximal effect of soman on GABAergic
transmission was observed at 10 nM, whereas 1 nM soman was sufficient
to inhibit cholinesterase activity by 99.5% in hippocampal slices.
Second, 15-min exposure of intact hippocampal slices to 100 nM PB
facilitated GABAergic transmission, but caused no significant change in
cholinesterase activity. Third, increased availability of ACh resulting
from cholinesterase blockade by soman or PB would have altered the
activity of nAChRs and muscarinic receptors, and consequently, affected
both glutamatergic and GABAergic transmissions. If cholinesterase
inhibition underlies the effects of soman or PB on GABAergic
transmission, they should also have been sensitive to nicotinic and
muscarinic receptor antagonists. Instead, soman- and PB-induced changes
in GABAergic transmission were selectively blocked by muscarinic
receptor antagonists. Therefore, potentiation and inhibition of
GABAergic transmission by PB and soman, respectively, are most likely
mediated by direct interactions of these compounds with muscarinic
receptors present in GABAergic neurons/fibers synapsing onto the
pyramidal neurons studied.
Previous binding and functional studies have indicated that soman and
PB interact directly with m2 and m3 receptors. In the rat heart, soman
displaces binding of
[3H]cis-methyldioxalane from m2
receptors; the reported K0.5 value is
0.8 nM (Silveira et al., 1990
). At concentrations >100 nM, soman also
acts as an m3 receptor antagonist as indicated by its ability to
inhibit mucus secretion in the ferret trachea (McBride et al., 1991
;
Ramnarine et al., 1996
). Soman-induced inhibition of GABAergic
transmission was blocked selectively by the m2 receptor-preferring antagonist AFDX-116 and showed a concentration dependence similar to
that of soman-induced displacement of
[3H]cis-methyldioxalane binding from
m2 receptors (Silveira et al., 1990
). These findings, in addition to
the fact that selective inhibition of m2 receptors by AFDX-116 alone
caused no significant change on GABAergic transmission, indicate that
the effect of soman on GABA release results primarily from its direct
action as an agonist on presynaptic m2 receptors. However, the
possibility that m3 receptor block contributes to soman-induced
inhibition of GABAergic transmission cannot be ruled out, because the
effect of soman on spontaneous IPSCs was more pronounced in slices
where cholinergic activity was enhanced, as previously reported, by field stimulation of Schaffer collaterals (Pitler and Alger, 1992
; Alkondon et al., 1998
; Araque et al., 2002
).
In rat brain membranes, PB displaces binding of the m2/m4 ligand
[3H]oxotremorine with an
IC50 value of approximately 1 µM (Lockhart et
al., 2001
) and in the rat trachea, PB activates m3 receptors with an
EC50 value of about 2.8 µM (Shibata et al.,
1998
). PB-induced activation of m3 receptors on GABAergic fibers
synapsing onto the CA1 pyramidal neurons under study can explain the
finding that potentiation of GABAergic transmission by 100 nM PB was
selectively blocked by the m3 receptor-preferring antagonist 4-DAMP.
The finding that PB at
300 nM had no significant effect on GABAergic
transmission can be accounted for by the fact that direct activation of
m2/m4 receptors by PB and consequent reduction of GABA release
counteracts (and might eventually prevail over) the increased GABA
release resulting from activation of m3 receptors. This notion is in
agreement with the finding that in three of four neurons 100 nM PB
caused a slight, but significant inhibition of GABAergic transmission when m3 receptors were inhibited by 4-DAMP.
Pretreatment, but not Post-Treatment with PB Can Mask Soman-Induced
Inhibition of GABAergic Transmission.
In hippocampal slices where
GABAergic transmission had already been inhibited by 1 nM soman, 100 nM
PB was devoid of any effect. An irreversible interaction of soman with
m3 receptors could explain the ability of the organophosphate to
inhibit the effect of PB. Alternatively, because there seems to be
cross talk between m2 and m3 receptors at the level of second messenger
(Dell'Acqua et al., 1993
), it is possible that alterations induced by
soman in the coupling of m2 receptors with G
proteins impair
signaling of the m3 receptors that subserve the effects of PB on
GABAergic transmission.
In hippocampal slices where GABAergic transmission had been potentiated
by preexposure to 100 nM PB, the inhibitory effect of soman could still
be detected. However, because the effects of 100 nM PB and 1 nM soman
on GABA release were diametrically opposed, preexposure of the slices
to 100 nM PB masked the effect of 1 nM soman. Pretreatment of the
slices with PB at a higher concentration that had negligible effect on
GABAergic transmission did not affect the magnitude of the inhibitory
effect of soman on GABA release. These findings indicate that PB up to
1 µM is unable to reverse the pseudoirreversible/irreversible
interaction of soman with its primary target, most likely, the m2
receptors. They also suggest that m3 receptor activation does not alter
m2 receptor signaling.
Toxicological Relevance.
Anxiety and hypolocomotion are common
symptoms observed in animals treated with low doses of soman, and
seizures are commonly observed in animals and humans exposed to high
doses of soman (Moore, 1998
). These symptoms correlate well with
decreased GABAA receptor activity in the CNS
(Ungard et al., 2000
; Trevitt et al., 2002
) and can, therefore, be the
result of the concentration-dependent inhibition of GABAergic
transmission by soman. In addition, although the cationic structure of
PB impairs its access to the brain, CNS-related symptoms have been
reported in both laboratory animals and humans treated with clinically
relevant doses of PB (Borland et al., 1985
; Servatius et al., 1998
;
Abou-Donia et al., 2002
). These symptoms, which include increased
arousal in humans and increased startle response in rats, have also
been observed under conditions of increased GABAergic activity (Fendt,
1998
; Xi et al., 1999
) and can thereby be the result of PB-induced
facilitation of GABAergic transmission.
The finding that potentiation of GABAergic transmission by 100 nM PB
functionally antagonized soman-induced inhibition of GABAergic
transmission only when hippocampal slices were pretreated with PB lends
support to the concept that PB can be an effective preventive
countermeasure to the neurotoxicity induced by low doses of soman. It
is concluded from the present study that, acting via m3 receptors
present on GABAergic neurons, PB at 100 nM effectively prevents
inhibition of GABAergic transmission induced by the interactions of
soman with m2 receptors located on GABAergic neurons. Thus, in the
absence of the nonselective muscarinic antagonist atropine, PB can
effectively counteract the toxic effects resulting from exposure to low
doses of soman.
Accepted for publication September 11, 2002.
Received for publication August 16, 2002.
This work was supported by the U.S. Army Medical and Research
Development Command contract DAMD-17-95-C-5063, a grant from the
Janssen Research Foundation, U.S. Public Health Service Grant NS41671,
and Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Brazil. A
preliminary account of this study was presented at the 1999 Annual
Meetings of the Society for Neurosciences (Abstr Soc Neurosci 25:1972, 1999; program no. 836.5, 2002 CD-ROM).
ACh, acetylcholine;
CNS, central nervous
system;
PB, pyridostigmine bromide;
AFDX-116, 11-[[[2-diethylamino-O-methyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydrol-6H-pyridol[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one;
ACSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid;
PSC, postsynaptic current;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
CNQX, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione;
APV, 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid;
4-DAMP, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine;
MLA, methyllycaconitine;
DH
E, dihydro-
-erythroidine;
EPSC, excitatory
postsynaptic current;
IPSC, inhibitory postsynaptic current;
nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor;
VX, O-ethyl
S-[2(diisopropylamino)ethyl]methylphosphonothioate;
QX-314, N-(2,6-dimethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl)triethylammonium
bromide.