![]() |
|
|
Vol. 304, Issue 1, 206-216, January 2003
4
2- and
4
4-Nicotinic
Acetylcholine Receptors
Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (C.L.G., L.H.W., R.J.L.) and Committee on Neuroscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (C.L.G., R.J.L.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of prolonged nicotinic ligand exposure on the function of human
4
2- and
4
4-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes were studied using receptors heterologously expressed in
SH-EP1 human epithelial cells. Magnitudes of acute, nAChR-mediated, specific 86Rb+ efflux responses to 1 mM
carbamylcholine were reduced after pretreatment with specific nAChR
ligands in effects that depended on pretreatment drug dose, duration of
drug pretreatment, and duration of drug-free recovery. Fifty percent
inhibition of
4
2-nAChR function following 5 min of recovery
occurred after 1 min of pretreatment with 1 mM nicotine but also after
1-h pretreatment at 10 nM nicotine. Seventy-five percent loss in
function persisted 1 h after drug removal following 15 min or more
of exposure to 1 mM nicotine. However, functional recovery was nearly
complete after 1 h in drug-free medium following 1 min to 24 h
pretreatment with 0.1 to 1 µM nicotine, i.e., in the range of smoker
plasma nicotine levels.
4
4-nAChR was similarly sensitive to
persistent inactivation by prolonged nicotine exposure. Carbamylcholine
exhibited slightly lower persistent inactivation potency than nicotine
at both
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR. The nAChR antagonist,
mecamylamine, exhibited persistent inactivation potency and efficacy
similar to nicotine at
4
2-nAChR but had a reduced effect on
4
4-nAChR. These studies illustrate persistent inactivation of
human
4
2- or
4
4-nAChR induced by prolonged exposure to
nicotine and show that other ligands induce nAChR persistent
inactivation in a subtype-specific manner.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Multiple
nAChR subtypes are present in the brain, each having a unique
distribution (reviewed in Lukas, 1998
). nAChRs in the brain are
suggested to play roles in attention and memory, in mood and emotion,
and in sensation and perception (reviewed in Paterson and Nordberg,
2000
). These nAChRs also have been implicated in nicotine dependence
(Balfour, 1994
) and in neurodegenerative and mood disorders (reviewed
in Mihailescu and Drucker-Colin, 2000b
).
Either through therapeutic use of nicotinic ligands to treat
neuropsychiatric disorders or via habitual use of tobacco products, there will be or is sustained exposure of the brain and body to nicotinic ligands. Any effects of such exposure are likely mediated by
effects on numbers and function of nAChRs. Historically, much attention
has focused on the phenomenon of quantitative increases in nAChR-like
radioligand binding sites ("up-regulation") following chronic
nicotine exposure (reviewed in Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). However,
up-regulation is predominantly attributable to changes in internal
rather than cell surface pools of nAChR-like radioligand binding sites
(Ke et al., 1998
; Whiteaker et al., 1998
), and its physiological
relevance is unclear (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). By contrast, effects on
nAChR function are of obvious, primary importance in determining
physiological and behavioral effects of sustained exposure to either
nicotine or nicotinic therapeutic agents (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
).
The literature predominantly indicates that sustained exposure to
nicotinic agonists induces losses in nAChR function. nAChR "desensitization", which descriptively refers to a rapid-in-onset, quickly and fully reversible loss of function during or following brief
(seconds) exposure to nicotinic agonists, was first discovered at the
nerve-muscle junction by Katz and Thesleff (1957)
. Subsequently, other
processes involving longer-lasting loss of nAChR function following
longer-term (minutes to days) nicotine exposure became recognized for
nAChR subtypes found in the periphery (Boyd, 1987
; Lukas, 1991
; Ke et
al., 1998
; Reitstetter et al., 1999
). Most studies also found that
sustained nicotinic agonist exposure induces more than one phase of
functional loss for the predominant, high-affinity nicotine-binding
nAChR in the brain, composed of
4 and
2 subunits (Flores et al.,
1992
), whether expressed naturally or heterologously in the oocyte
system (Collins et al., 1990a
; Marks et al., 1993
; Hsu et al., 1996
;
Fenster et al., 1997
; Gopalakrishnan et al., 1997
; Olale et al., 1997
;
Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). The longer-lasting losses of nAChR function
have been called "specific chronic desensitization" (Ochoa et al.,
1990
; Collins et al., 1994
), "stable desensitization" (Mihailescu
and Drucker-Colin, 2000a
), "functional down-regulation" (Marks et
al., 1993
), "long-lasting inactivation" (Kawai and Berg, 2001
), or
"persistent inactivation" (Lukas, 1991
; Lukas et al., 1996
; Ke et
al., 1998
). Nevertheless, further evolution in the understanding of
nAChR functional state transitions is required to identify mechanisms
and to specify processes involved in "desensitization" or any of
the other, apparently distinct processes of longer-lasting nAChR
functional loss. For example, there still is ambiguity about whether
and to what extent "desensitization" due to conversion to a
closed-channel form is "contaminated" with agonist-mediated open-channel block; it is not yet clear whether phosphorylation or
other processes account for loss of nAChR function with agonist exposure (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). That is, before tangible definitions of desensitization or of other, longer-lasting phases of nAChR functional loss can be formulated beyond postulated conversions of
agonist-receptor complexes to inactive forms, explanations for these
phenomena require refinement.
Although most studies have shown functional loss for
4
2-nAChR on
sustained exposure to nicotine, a recent electrophysiological study of
human
4
2-nAChR heterologously expressed in a mammalian human
embryonic kidney-derived cell line reported an enhancement of function
under some experimental conditions following chronic exposure to
nicotine (Buisson and Bertrand, 2001
). This finding poses new questions
about whether and how different expression systems and details of
experimental design influence functional responsiveness of individual
nAChR subtypes to chronic nicotinic ligand exposure.
This study examines functional responses of human
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR heterologously expressed in the SH-EP1 human epithelial line following pretreatment with nicotinic ligands. Whereas the
4
2-nAChR subtype is of obvious importance, nAChR
4 subunit messages as detected by in situ hybridization in nonhuman primate brain
also are abundant and colocalize with
4 subunit messages (Quik et
al., 2000
). Moreover,
4 and
4 subunits combine to form a
functional nAChR ion channel with high affinity for nicotine (Eaton et
al., 2000
). The current studies examined and contrasted effects of
nicotine as a membrane-permeant agonist, carbamylcholine (carb)
as an ionic nAChR agonist, and mecamylamine (mec) as a prototypical
nAChR antagonist with potential as an aid to smoking cessation (Rose et
al., 1998
) and a therapeutic (Sanberg et al., 1997
). A preliminary
report of these findings has appeared (Gentry and Lukas, 2001
).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug Dilutions.
All drugs were prepared fresh on the day of
the assay as 10 mM stock solutions in cell culture medium (see cell
culture) and diluted appropriately for each experiment. Efflux assay
buffer consisted of 130 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 5 mM glucose, and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Ringer's buffer consisted of 115 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 1.3 mM MgSO4, and 33 mM Tris supplemented with 1.5 mM NaN3. Buffer
components as well as (
)-nicotine bitartrate, carb Cl, and mec HCl
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Model Cell Lines and Cell Culture.
The present study used
low-passage (less than 50) SH-EP1 human epithelial cell clones stably
and heterologously expressing human
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs to
examine functional responsiveness of receptors following pretreatment
with nicotine or other nicotinic ligands. These clonal cell lines were
generated using techniques that have been previously reported (Peng et
al., 1999
; Eaton et al., 2000
; Lukas et al., 2002
). Briefly,
transfection with pcDNA3.1-zeo-human
4 and pcDNA3.1-hygro-human
2
constructs created in our laboratory [subcloned using human
4(S452)
and
2 subunit cDNAs kindly provided by Dr. Ortrud Steinlein,
Rheinishce-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet, Bonn, Germany] followed by
isolation of a stable, high-expressing clonal line was accomplished to
create SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells. Transfection with pCEP4-hygro-human
4
and pcDNA3.1-zeo-human
4 constructs created in our laboratory (the
latter was subcloned using a human
4 subunit cDNA kindly provided by
Dr. Jon Lindstrom, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) also,
followed by isolation of a high-expressing clone, was used to generate
SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells. Cells were maintained at 37°C, under 95%
O2/5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 10% horse serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 1% sodium pyruvate (Cellgro AK; Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA), 2% glutamine penicillin-streptomycin (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA), and 0.02% amphotericin B (Sigma). Cell culture medium
was also supplemented with 0.01% hygromycin (Calbiochem, San Diego,
CA) and 0.03% zeocin (Invitrogen) to maintain stable expression of
4 and
2 or
4 subunits.
Assays of nAChR Function.
86Rb+ efflux assays (Lukas
and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas et al., 2002
) were performed using
SH-EP1-h
4
2 or SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells with some assay
modifications to account for the nicotinic ligand pretreatment protocol. Cells were cultured (~2 × 105
cells per 15.5-mm-diameter well; ~150 µg of total cell protein per
well) on Falcon 24-well culture plates (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA)
precoated with poly(D-lysine), mol. wt. 70,000 to 150,000 (Sigma). Cells were grown overnight to confluence, verified using light
microscopy. 86RbCl (3.8 mCi/mg or 0.2 cpm/fmol at
40% counting efficiency) was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences
(Boston, MA).
4
2 cells (loaded with 3000 cpm of
350,000 cpm of applied
86Rb+) and 3500 cpm and 400 cpm, respectively, for SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells (loaded with 5000 cpm of
350,000 cpm of applied
86Rb+).
Conditions for 86Rb+ Loading. Prior to initiating experiments, a control study compared effects of three different methods for 15-min ligand pretreatment: 1) simply adding a concentrated aliquot of ligand in media to cells maintained in 86Rb+ loading media, 2) using the flip plate method to replace 86Rb+ loading media with 86Rb+-free media containing ligand, and 3) using the flip plate method to apply ligand in 86Rb+ loading medium. Regardless of the method used, double-normalized results obtained (see Data Analysis below) were nearly identical (data not shown). This indicated that final results were not influenced by differences in 86Rb+ loading during ligand pretreatment.
Data Analysis. To control for possible influences of ligand pretreatment and recovery conditions on 86Rb+ loading, data were subjected to a double normalization process. Background radioactivity was subtracted from all samples. Amounts of 86Rb+ loaded and present intracellularly at the start of the acute agonist challenge to initiate the functional efflux assay were determined as the sum for each sample of released (extracellular) and remaining (intracellular) 86Rb+ present at the conclusion of the functional assay. Specific 86Rb+ efflux was defined as total 86Rb+ efflux minus nonspecific 86Rb+ efflux (described above). Normalized specific 86Rb+ efflux was then expressed as a percentage of specific 86Rb+ efflux divided by 86Rb+ loaded. Double normalized specific 86Rb+ efflux was then expressed as a percentage of normalized specific 86Rb+ efflux for experimental samples subjected to ligand pretreatment divided by normalized specific 86Rb+ efflux for control samples not subjected to ligand pretreatment. Data were plotted as means ± S.E.M. using Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Results from three or more independent experiments are shown. Appropriate to sample size and degrees of freedom, unpaired t tests (two comparisons) or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests (three comparisons) or Tukey's post hoc tests (greater than three comparisons) were used to evaluate statistical significance of important data sets. Most of the statistically significant differences between and within panels of data are obvious, but statistically significant differences that are not as evident are specified in the narrative, whereas remarks about similarity between such sets of data refer to differences that are not statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval.
Radiolabeled Epibatidine Binding Studies.
Competition for
[3H]epibatidine (EBDN) binding sites on cell
membranes prepared from SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells (Lukas et al., 2002
) was
utilized as a sensitive method for quantifying residual nicotine in
efflux buffer samples collected during successive rinses of cells
pretreated for 48 h with nicotine. Assays were performed in a
total volume of 200 µl of Ringer's buffer in a 96-well plate format.
Each well used to define the concentration of nicotine in one rinse
sample of efflux buffer by competition for EBDN binding sites contained
50 µl of a 400 pM concentration of EBDN (final concentration = 100 pM), 50 µl of efflux buffer from one rinse sample, and 100 µl
of SH-EP1-
4
2 cell membrane suspension (diluted to ensure that
binding site concentrations were no more than 10 pM). Total control
binding was defined as the binding of EBDN in the absence of any rinse
sample, which was substituted for by a 50-µl aliquot of
Ringer's-NaN3 buffer. Following a 1-h incubation at room temperature (~22°C), cell membrane-bound EBDN was separated from unbound EBDN using a cell harvester system (Inotech Biosystems International, Inc., Rockville, MD) by filtration through GF/C glass
fiber filters (Inotech Biosystems International, Inc.) that had been
presoaked in a 0.1% polyethyleneimine solution at 4°C for at least
30 min. Cell membranes embedded in the filters were subsequently rinsed
twice with ice-cold Ringer's buffer before being transferred to Ready
Safe Liquid Scintillation Cocktail (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton,
CA) for determination of [3H] content by
coincidence counting on a Wallac MicroBeta TriLux microplate liquid
scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Counts obtained were
transformed for presentation to a percentage of control specific EBDN
binding defined in each assay.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Determination of Residual Drug Levels.
Because a recurring
technical critique of some studies of effects of chronic drug treatment
regards possible effects of residual pretreatment drug on the parameter
being measured, experiments were conducted to ensure that the rinse
method used in our nicotine pretreatment-acute challenge protocol was
sufficient to remove pretreatment ligands, thereby allowing nAChR to
recover from effects of drug pretreatment in a drug-free environment.
Other studies showed that rinses of 30- to 60-s duration were adequate
to allow equilibration in nicotine distribution between intra- and
extracellular spaces (J. Fryer and R. D. Lukas, unpublished
observations). Independent experiments were completed to measure
residual nicotine levels present in buffers used to rinse
SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells after nicotine pretreatment based on the ability
of residual drug to activate nAChR-mediated
86Rb+ efflux from fresh
SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells (Fig. 1). These
functional assays demonstrated that nicotine levels in first-rinse
samples were >100-fold lower than the initial nicotine concentration
(i.e., there was a more than 2 log unit, rightward shift in the
dose-response profile for the first-rinse sample from that for acute
nicotine effects). Residual nicotine present in second-rinse samples
elicited ion flux only if initial nicotine concentrations were 1 mM,
but with efficacy equivalent to 0.3 to 1 µM nicotine, indicating a 1000- to 3000-fold removal of drug. Levels of residual nicotine present
in third-rinse samples had been reduced to below those capable of
eliciting any 86Rb+ efflux;
i.e., below 100 nM, a greater than 10,000-fold reduction. The
efficiency of removal of nicotine in the second rinse appeared to be
slightly lower following longer pretreatment times of 1 or 48 h
relative to 20 s of nicotine pretreatment, but no pretreatment time-dependent difference in nicotine removal was observed after the
third rinse. Thus, three rinses were routinely used to process samples.
|
|
Effects of Nicotine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
Effects of prolonged nicotine exposure on
heterologously expressed
4
2-nAChRs were examined.
4
2-nAChRs
are the predominant form of high-affinity nicotine binding site in the
brain, making them not only physiologically and pharmacologically
important, but also the most likely effectors in nicotine dependence.
Pre-exposure of SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells for 1 min to nicotine at
concentrations as low as 1 µM produced an ~20% loss of human
4
2-nAChR function when tested with an acute challenge dose of
carb after 1 min of recovery from nicotine pre-exposure (Fig.
3, top-left). Losses of function for
1-min pretreatment with 1 or 10 µM nicotine reversed (i.e., function
elicited by an acute challenge dose of carb returned to control levels)
after 1 h of recovery. However, after 1 h (or less) of
recovery, losses of function were still evident in cells pre-exposed to
100 µM (~20% loss for 1-h recovery) or 1 mM (~30% loss for 1-h
recovery) nicotine. In the absence of tangible definitions of
desensitization and phases of longer-lasting losses of nAChR function
induced by sustained nicotinic agonist exposure, explicit, operational
definitions provided by Ke et al. (1998)
distinguishing desensitization
as a loss of nAChR function that is reversed during a 5-min period of
recovery from agonist exposure from persistent inactivation, which was
defined as a loss of nAChR function that is not reversed during a 5-min
period of recovery from agonist exposure, were applied for their
empirical utility. Thus, levels of persistent inactivation surviving
the 5-min recovery period were ~10% for pretreatment with 1 µM
nicotine and ~55% for pretreatment with 1 mM nicotine.
|
4
2-nAChR functional losses, such that
doses of nicotine as low as 10 nM (compare to smoker plasma/brain levels of 100 nM-1 µM) induced losses of nAChR function (Fig. 3).
Following nicotine exposure for 15 min,
4
2-nAChR exhibited a
decline in functional responsiveness at pretreatment doses as low as
100 nM, 75% of
4
2-nAChR function was lost following exposure to
1 µM nicotine, and pretreatment with nicotine at 10 µM or greater
caused nearly total loss of receptor function (Fig. 3, top-right).
Whereas the functional loss resulting from pretreatment with 10 µM
nicotine recovered almost completely within 1 h, nAChRs exposed to
1 mM nicotine regained only 20% of their function following 1 h
in drug-free buffer. After 5 min of recovery, the extent of persistent
inactivation varied between ~15% for 100 nM nicotine pretreatment
and ~90% for pre-exposure to 1 mM nicotine.
Following a 1-h pretreatment (compared with 1- or 15-min pretreatment)
with nicotine, additional functional decline was observed throughout
the dose range examined (Fig. 3, bottom-left). The most remarkable
effects were those at lower concentrations of nicotine. Pre-exposure to
10 nM nicotine caused ~60% loss of
4
2-nAChR function at 1 min
of recovery, ~20% functional loss that persisted after 30 min of
recovery, and ~10% functional loss evident after 1 h of
recovery. Losses in function at higher doses of nicotine pretreatment
were even greater. Overall, for 1-h pretreatment, persistent
inactivation remaining after 5 min of recovery ranged from ~50% at
10 to 100 nM nicotine to no recovery of
4
2-nAChR response after 1 mM nicotine exposure.
Functional profiles for
4
2-nAChRs pretreated with nicotine for
24 h and allowed to recover for times ranging from 1 min to 1 h were similar to profiles for 1-h pretreatment (Fig. 3, bottom-right).
One-hour recovery was sufficient to bring receptors exposed to 10 µM
or less of nicotine back to levels of function matching that of
untreated control cells. However, for the 5-min recovery period, losses
of function ranged between ~45% for 10 nM nicotine pretreatment and
~100% for pre-exposure to 1 mM nicotine.
Effects of Nicotine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
Studies of effects of chronic nicotine
exposure on function of human
4
4-nAChRs were also conducted
because nAChR
4 subunit messages in nonhuman primate brain have been
reported to be abundant and to colocalize with
4 subunit messages
and because human
4
4-nAChRs also have high affinity for nicotine.
Upon prolonged nicotine exposure, heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs in transfected SH-EP1 cells became less responsive to
subsequent activation by 1 mM carb (Fig.
4), and patterns of functional changes
were similar to those of
4
2-nAChRs. Following 1 min of exposure
to 1 mM nicotine, an ~75% reduction in efflux from
4
4-nAChRs
was observed (Fig. 4, top-left). Functional response remained at
~50% of normal when cells were allowed to recover for 1 h in
drug-free buffer. A dose of 100 µM nicotine led to ~50% reduction
in
4
4-nAChR function that did recover substantially (to ~20%
loss) following 1 h in drug-free buffer. One-minute pretreatment
with nicotine at 1 µM or less did not induce persistent inactivation.
Five-minute recovery allowed
4
4-nAChR function to return to
~80%, 70%, or 40% of control, respectively, after 10 µM, 100 µM, or 1 mM nicotine pre-exposure.
|
4
4-nAChRs exposed to nicotine for 15 min showed slightly greater
functional decline than was observed following only 1 min of nicotine
exposure and slightly less functional loss than was observed for
4
2-nAChRs following an equivalent nicotine exposure (Fig. 4,
top-right).
4
4-nAChR function did not return to normal following
1 h of recovery in drug-free buffer except when pretreatment nicotine concentration was less than 100 nM. Persistent inactivation was observed at all doses tested (10 nM-1 mM).
Increasing the pretreatment time to 1 or 24 h led to greater loss
of function for
4
4-nAChRs (Fig. 4, bottom, left and right). For
example, 24-h nicotine pretreatment and 1-min recovery was significantly different from 1-min pretreatment and 1-min recovery (p < 0.05). Effects at 10 or 100 nM nicotine became
more profound. Losses of function were ~35 to 80% after 1-min
recovery and remained at ~10 to 25% after 1-h recovery. Pretreatment
with 1 µM nicotine for 1 h followed by 1 min of recovery
produced ~75% loss of receptor function, and increasing the
pretreatment time to 24 h completely eliminated responses to
subsequent carb challenge. Function was entirely lost for 1- or 24-h
pretreatment with 10 µM to 1 mM nicotine after 1 min of recovery,
although function returned to between 30 and 89% of control after
1 h in drug-free medium. Using the persistent inactivation
criteria, losses in function after 5-min recovery ranged between
~30% at 10 nM nicotine and ~90% at 1 mM nicotine.
To summarize the results of nicotine pre-exposure on
4
2- and
4
4-nAChRs, the extent of functional loss for each subtype depended on duration of nicotine pretreatment, duration of recovery in
nicotine-free buffer, and concentration of nicotine during pretreatment. Loss of nAChR function occurred following pretreatment with low (10-100 nM) concentrations of nicotine, but only for pretreatment times of 15 min or longer.
Effects of Carbamylcholine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
carb was chosen for study as a
representative ionic agonist to allow comparisons of its ability and
that of nicotine as a membrane-permeant agonist to induce changes in
nAChR function. One-minute pretreatments with 0.1 or 1 mM carb caused a
reduction in heterologously expressed, human
4
2-nAChR function of
15% and 25%, respectively, when measured with a subsequent, acute carb challenge (Fig. 5, top-left). In
both cases, receptor function fully recovered within 30 min. One-min
pretreatment with carb concentrations of 10 µM or less had no effect.
Only 100 µM or 1 mM pretreatments produced persistent inactivation.
|
4
2-nAChR
function by more than 80% (Fig. 5, top-right). Following a 1-h recovery period,
4
2-nAChR function had returned to 75% of
untreated control. With a 15-min pretreatment, functional effects were
seen at concentrations as low as 10 µM. The 30% reduction in
4
2-nAChR function observed under these conditions recovered fully
within 15 min. However, 15-min pre-exposure to carb at concentrations between 10 nM and 1 µM produced no functional loss, although
4
2-nAChR persistent inactivation of ~25%, ~50%, and ~70%
was observed for pre-exposure to 10 µM, 100 µM, and 1 mM carb, respectively.
An additional decline in receptor function was observed following 1-h
pretreatment with carb (Fig. 5, bottom-left) when compared with 15 min
of pretreatment. Most notable differences included some functional loss
at lower concentrations (100 nM-1 µM carb) and an increase in the
extent of functional loss at higher concentrations, e.g., to 100% for
1-h pretreatment with 1 mM carb followed by 1-min recovery. However,
persistent inactivation was detectable at doses as low as 100 nM.
Functional dose-response profiles for
4
2-nAChR inactivation
following 24-h pretreatment with carb and 1-min recovery were similar
to the profiles for 1-h pretreatment and equivalent times of recovery
(Fig. 5, bottom-right).
Effects of Carbamylcholine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
Following 1 min of carb exposure,
heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs functioned normally
except when pretreated with concentrations of carb greater than 100 µM (Fig. 6, top-left). One-minute
exposure to 1 mM carb and 1-min recovery led to a reduction of efflux
response (~20% decline). Receptor function returned to normal after
30 min in drug-free buffer. Greater
4
4-nAChR functional effects
were observed following 15 min of carb exposure (Fig. 6, top-right).
After 1 h of incubation, pretreatment concentrations of carb as
low as 10 µM began to have an effect on
4
4-nAChR function (Fig.
6, bottom-left), although function recovered fully within 1 h of
drug-free recovery. Functional losses of ~60 to 70% occurred for 1-h
pretreatment with 0.1 to 1 mM carb, and function recovered to only
~80% of control after 1 h of recovery. Increasing carb exposure
time from 1 to 24 h did not change
4
4-nAChR functional inactivation (Fig. 6, bottom-right), although the range for functional loss remaining at 1 h of recovery extended to 100 nM carb (~10% loss; ~25% at 0.01 to 1 mM carb). Persistent inactivation first became evident for 1-min pretreatment with 1 mM carb, for 15 min to
1 h of pretreatment with 10 µM carb, or for 24-h pretreatment with 100 nM carb.
|
4
2- and
4
4-nAChRs when increasing pretreatment time and concentration. Differences were also observed between
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR
responses to 1-min or 15-min carb treatment, with
4
2-nAChRs
showing greater sensitivity to carb-induced functional loss (unpaired
t test, p < 0.01).
Effects of Mecamylamine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
Studies were done to determine whether
chronic exposure to mec could induce long-lasting nAChR functional
changes, in part because of its potential utility as a smoking
cessation aid and therapeutic, but also because its noncompetitive
antagonism might occur through open-channel block, possibly mimicking
effects of nicotine acting at high concentrations and/or chronically.
Pretreatment with mec induced functional losses in heterologously
expressed, human
4
2-nAChRs that persisted after removal of the
drug from media (Fig. 7). It should be
noted, however, that experiments evaluating effectiveness of rinses for
removing mec after pretreatment (not shown) indicated that our protocol
yielded an ~1000-fold reduction in mec concentration, meaning that
for samples pretreated with 1 mM mec, enough residual drug could remain
to antagonize as much as 50% of receptor function. Nevertheless, these
studies showed that residual mec levels would be less than those needed to acutely produce nAChR functional block if pretreatment with mec was
done at concentrations of 100 µM or less. Therefore, although efficiency of mec removal was lower than for removal of nicotine, any
functional loss observed following pretreatment with lower concentrations of mec can be attributed to desensitization and/or persistent inactivation rather than channel block.
4
2-nAChRs were
functioning at 25% of normal following 100 µM mec pre-exposure for 1 min and 1 min of recovery, but 5 to 60 min of recovery allowed function
to return to ~85% of control levels (Fig. 7, top-left). Pretreatment
for 1 min with mec at concentrations less than 10 µM had negligible
effects on
4
2-nAChR function. Persistent inactivation evident
after 5 min of recovery was about 15% for 1-min pretreatment with 10 µM mec.
|
4
2-nAChR functional loss of
25%, although this effect was fully reversed within 30 min of recovery
in drug-free media. One hour was insufficient for complete recovery
from functional loss after pretreatment with mec of concentrations 1 µM or higher. Defined as the loss of function after 5 min of drug
removal, persistent inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs ranged from ~10%
at 10 nM mec to ~90% at 100 µM mec. Concentration-response
profiles following 24-h mec pretreatment were similar to those
following 1 h of mec exposure (Fig. 7, bottom-right). Persistent
inactivation ranged from 20% at 100 nM mec to ~100% at 10 µM mec
or higher.
Effects of Mecamylamine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
One minute of pretreatment with as much
as 10 µM mec had no effect on subsequently assessed function of
heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs (Fig.
8, top-left). Following 1 min of 1 mM mec
exposure and 1-min recovery,
4
4-nAChR functional response was
50% of untreated control. Functional assessment after 5 min of
recovery found
4
4-nAChRs to function at 70% of normal, and recovery was to 95% of control after 0.5 to 1 h in drug-free
medium. No significant differences were observed if mec pretreatment
times were extended to 15 min (Fig. 8, top-right). One or 24 h of
pretreatment with 1 mM mec yielded only modest increases in the extent
of functional loss (Fig. 8, bottom, left and right). However,
pre-exposure to 100 µM mec for 1 h induced an ~30% loss in
function, although recovery occurred within 5 to 60 min of drug-free
incubation.
|
4
2-nAChRs exhibited a substantial reduction in
functional responsiveness following mec pretreatments, whereas
4
4-nAChRs were less vulnerable to persistent inactivation caused by mec exposure.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Major Findings.
One of the major findings of this study is
that pre-exposure to nicotine induces losses in function of human
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs heterologously expressed in the SH-EP1
cell line. Losses in function, measured at maximally efficacious
challenge doses of acute agonist, are substantial after pretreatment
with concentrations of nicotine (~100 nM-1 µM) found in the plasma
of human smokers (Russell et al., 1980
). These losses in function are
even more pronounced after pretreatment at higher doses of nicotine,
i.e., at concentrations that have acute functional efficacy equivalent
to acetylcholine when acting at active synapses. Using the operational
definition of persistent inactivation as the loss of function after 5 min of drug-free incubation (Ke et al., 1998
), the present study found that 1 h of nicotine pretreatment at "smoker doses" of 100 nM to 1 µM induces 60 to 80% loss of human
4*-nAChR function, and recovery to 90% of control levels requires ~1 h after drug removal.
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs as
assessed by functional inactivation potency (dose dependence), rate of
functional inactivation (time dependence), and extent of functional
inactivation (percentage of functional loss for a given dose and time
of drug exposure). A third major finding is that human
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR subtypes differ in their sensitivity to functional
inactivation after mec pretreatment. Pretreatment with mec powerfully
induces functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs but has no lasting
effect on
4
4-nAChR function except when mec concentrations during
pretreatment are greater than 100 µM. These observations provide
insight into molecular bases for functional inactivation.
Ligand and nAChR Subtype Selectivity of Functional
Inactivation.
As an ionic species, carb does not freely traverse
the membrane lipid bilayer and gain access to the intracellular space
as readily as nicotine does. The finding that carb induces
4*-nAChR receptor desensitization and inactivation suggests that ligand access
to cytoplasmic or other buried domains is not required for functional
inactivation. Nevertheless, whether expressed in absolute terms or
normalized to agonist acute functional efficacy and potency, nicotine
has more persistent inactivation potency (1-h pretreatment, 5-min
recovery) than carb at either
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs (Table
1). This suggests that the ability of
nicotine to access the cell interior may indeed play a role in its
strong induction of persistent inactivation. Whether expressed
absolutely or after normalization to agonist acute potency, persistent
inactivation potency of carb is higher (>6- to >20-fold) at
4
2-
than at
4
4-nAChRs (Table 1), suggesting an influence of nAChR
subunit sequence on this effect.
|
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs (Table 1). The higher sensitivity of
4
2-nAChRs than
4
4-nAChRs to mec-induced persistent
inactivation (Table 1) implicates
2-
4 subunit sequence
differences in this effect. mec acts as an open-channel blocker of
nAChRs (Varanda et al., 1985
4
2- or
4
4-nAChR (Peng et al.,
1999
4*-nAChRs or
activates transient channel openings not detected using contemporary
ion flux or electrophysiological measurements, our data with mec
suggest that channel opening is not required for conversion of
4*-nAChR to an inactivated state(s). Some noncompetitive antagonists
as well as agonists can induce desensitization and/or persistent
inactivation of other nAChR subtypes (Lukas, 1991
4*-nAChR after pretreatment, as was shown for nicotine.
Also of relevance is the finding that concentrations of nicotine below
those needed to acutely activate
4*-nAChR induce nAChR persistent
inactivation. This supports the hypothesis that channel activation is
not required for
4*-nAChR persistent inactivation. It also is
consistent with potential mechanisms involving open-channel block (but
of infrequently opening channels), allosteric interactions at distinct
ligand binding sites, or stabilization of
4*-nAChR in closed-channel states.
Comparisons to Other in Vitro Findings.
Findings in the
present study using the SH-EP1 human epithelial cell expression system
are consistent with numerous reports of functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs from different species in diverse experimental systems
following chronic nicotine exposure (Peng et al., 1994
; Hsu et al.,
1996
; Fenster et al., 1997
; Olale et al., 1997
). Other nAChR subtypes
that undergo functional inactivation following prolonged nicotine
exposure include human muscle-type
1*-nAChR naturally expressed in
TE671/RD cells,
7-nAChR and
3*-nAChR expressed in
Xenopus oocytes, and ganglionic
3*-nAChR naturally
expressed in rat PC12 or human SH-SY5Y cells (reviewed in Gentry and
Lukas, 2002
). Additionally, evidence from in vivo studies that allow
evaluation of nicotine effects and recovery times on the order of days
are consistent with the hypothesis that chronic nicotine inactivates
brain nAChR (reviewed in Gentry and Lukas, 2002
).
4
2-nAChR heterologously expressed in the
K-177 cell variant of the HEK293 human embryonic kidney fibroblast cell
line can be up-regulated in response to nicotine (0.1-1 µM for 8 h-7 days), although exposure to 10 µM or higher nicotine produced
functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChR, whether measured using ion
flux or whole-cell electrophysiological recording (Gopalakrishnan et
al., 1997
4
2-nAChRs to
chronic nicotine exposure and, if so, to elucidate the reasons for
these differences.
Relationships Between Chronic Nicotine-Induced Functional
Inactivation and nAChR Numerical Up-Regulation.
Several factors
can account for changes in the level of measurable nAChR function.
Among these are enhanced/reduced conductance of each channel,
enhanced/reduced frequency of channel opening, or
longer/shorter channel open time. Among these possibilities, changes
brought about by nicotinic ligands may be influenced by membrane lipid
composition effecting conformational equilibria of nAChR (Baenziger et
al., 2000
), electrostatic interactions (Song and Pedersen, 2000
),
enzymatic carboxymethylation (Kloog et al., 1980
), conformation changes
(Baenziger and Chew, 1997
), phosphorylation (Hsu et al., 1997
; Fenster
et al., 1999a
), endocytosis/exocytosis (Peng et al., 1994
), or number
of nAChRs on the cell surface (Ke et al., 1998
).
4
2-nAChR responses on SH-EP1 cells exposed to nicotine for
24 h did recover somewhat more quickly than nAChR on cells exposed
to nicotine for only 1 h. Perhaps this reflects the presence of
more surface nAChR or nAChR precursors due to an increase in numbers of
nAChR-like radioligand binding sites as would occur over the longer
period of nicotine exposure.
Perspectives.
The current evaluation of effects of prolonged
nicotinic ligand exposure on function of human
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR provides a comprehensive characterization of nAChR
desensitization and persistent inactivation and adds to findings
indicating that all nAChR subtypes experience functional loss in
response to chronic ligand exposure. Knowledge of nAChR subtype
selectivity with regard to rates, extents, and nicotinic ligand
concentration dependence of nAChR activation, desensitization, and
persistent inactivation is critical toward development of rational
approaches for nicotinic drug therapies in treatment of
neuropsychiatric disorders and successful approaches to smoking
cessation recognizing that tobacco use is a form of nicotine
self-medication (reviewed in Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). This is because,
as the current studies show, acute and more chronic effects of
nicotinic drugs are integrated across nAChR subtypes, drug exposure
time, and drug dose at sites of nAChR expression, inducing some balance
between activation and inactivation not only of nAChR subtypes, but
also of the excitatory or inhibitory effects they have on specific
neuronal processes and functions.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are very grateful for the kind gifts of human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit DNA from Dr. Ortrud Steinlein of the Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet and from Dr. Jon M. Lindstrom of the University of Pennsylvania. We also appreciate statistical analysis consultations with Drs. Kris Horn and Curtis Bay.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 11, 2002.
Received for publication July 16, 2002.
1 Current Address: Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0236.
This work was supported by the Ford Foundation, by
scholarship support from the International Chapter, P.E.O. Sisterhood, by a grant from the Arizona Disease Control Research Commission (10011), by endowment and/or capitalization funds from the Men's and
Women's Boards of the Barrow Neurological Foundation, and by the
Robert and Gloria Wallace Foundation, and was conducted in part in the
Charlotte and Harold Simensky Neurochemistry of Alzheimer's Disease
Laboratory. Work was previously presented in preliminary form (Gentry
and Lukas, 2001
). The contents of this report are solely the
responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
views of the aforementioned awarding agencies.
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.041756
Address correspondence to: Ronald J. Lukas, Ph.D., Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W. Thomas Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85013. E-mail: rlukas{at}chw.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; carb, carbamylcholine; EBDN, [3H]epibatidine; mec, mecamylamine; ANOVA, analysis of variance.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
2-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR).
Soc Neurosci Abstr
25:
1723.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Markou Neurobiology of nicotine dependence Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2008; 363(1507): 3159 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wu, Q. Liu, K. Yu, J. Hu, Y.-P. Kuo, M. Segerberg, P. A. St John, and R. J. Lukas Roles of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor {beta} subunits in function of human {alpha}4-containing nicotinic receptors J. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 576(1): 103 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kuryatov, J. Luo, J. Cooper, and J. Lindstrom Nicotine Acts as a Pharmacological Chaperone to Up-Regulate Human {alpha}4{beta}2 Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1839 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Davis, J. R. James, S. J. Siegel, and T. J. Gould Withdrawal from Chronic Nicotine Administration Impairs Contextual Fear Conditioning in C57BL/6 Mice J. Neurosci., September 21, 2005; 25(38): 8708 - 8713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-P. Kuo, L. Xu, J. B. Eaton, L. Zhao, J. Wu, and R. J. Lukas Roles for Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunit Large Cytoplasmic Loop Sequences in Receptor Expression and Function J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2005; 314(1): 455 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Damaj, F. I. Carroll, J. B. Eaton, H. A. Navarro, B. E. Blough, S. Mirza, R. J. Lukas, and B. R. Martin Enantioselective Effects of Hydroxy Metabolites of Bupropion on Behavior and on Function of Monoamine Transporters and Nicotinic Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 675 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||