Division of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix,
Arizona (C.L.G., L.H.W., R.J.L.) and Committee on
Neuroscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (C.L.G.,
R.J.L.)
 |
Introduction |
Multiple
nAChR subtypes are present in the brain, each having a unique
distribution (reviewed in Lukas, 1998
). nAChRs in the brain are
suggested to play roles in attention and memory, in mood and emotion,
and in sensation and perception (reviewed in Paterson and Nordberg,
2000
). These nAChRs also have been implicated in nicotine dependence
(Balfour, 1994
) and in neurodegenerative and mood disorders (reviewed
in Mihailescu and Drucker-Colin, 2000b
).
Either through therapeutic use of nicotinic ligands to treat
neuropsychiatric disorders or via habitual use of tobacco products, there will be or is sustained exposure of the brain and body to nicotinic ligands. Any effects of such exposure are likely mediated by
effects on numbers and function of nAChRs. Historically, much attention
has focused on the phenomenon of quantitative increases in nAChR-like
radioligand binding sites ("up-regulation") following chronic
nicotine exposure (reviewed in Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). However,
up-regulation is predominantly attributable to changes in internal
rather than cell surface pools of nAChR-like radioligand binding sites
(Ke et al., 1998
; Whiteaker et al., 1998
), and its physiological
relevance is unclear (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). By contrast, effects on
nAChR function are of obvious, primary importance in determining
physiological and behavioral effects of sustained exposure to either
nicotine or nicotinic therapeutic agents (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
).
The literature predominantly indicates that sustained exposure to
nicotinic agonists induces losses in nAChR function. nAChR "desensitization", which descriptively refers to a rapid-in-onset, quickly and fully reversible loss of function during or following brief
(seconds) exposure to nicotinic agonists, was first discovered at the
nerve-muscle junction by Katz and Thesleff (1957)
. Subsequently, other
processes involving longer-lasting loss of nAChR function following
longer-term (minutes to days) nicotine exposure became recognized for
nAChR subtypes found in the periphery (Boyd, 1987
; Lukas, 1991
; Ke et
al., 1998
; Reitstetter et al., 1999
). Most studies also found that
sustained nicotinic agonist exposure induces more than one phase of
functional loss for the predominant, high-affinity nicotine-binding
nAChR in the brain, composed of
4 and
2 subunits (Flores et al.,
1992
), whether expressed naturally or heterologously in the oocyte
system (Collins et al., 1990a
; Marks et al., 1993
; Hsu et al., 1996
;
Fenster et al., 1997
; Gopalakrishnan et al., 1997
; Olale et al., 1997
;
Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). The longer-lasting losses of nAChR function
have been called "specific chronic desensitization" (Ochoa et al.,
1990
; Collins et al., 1994
), "stable desensitization" (Mihailescu
and Drucker-Colin, 2000a
), "functional down-regulation" (Marks et
al., 1993
), "long-lasting inactivation" (Kawai and Berg, 2001
), or
"persistent inactivation" (Lukas, 1991
; Lukas et al., 1996
; Ke et
al., 1998
). Nevertheless, further evolution in the understanding of
nAChR functional state transitions is required to identify mechanisms
and to specify processes involved in "desensitization" or any of
the other, apparently distinct processes of longer-lasting nAChR
functional loss. For example, there still is ambiguity about whether
and to what extent "desensitization" due to conversion to a
closed-channel form is "contaminated" with agonist-mediated open-channel block; it is not yet clear whether phosphorylation or
other processes account for loss of nAChR function with agonist exposure (Gentry and Lukas, 2002
). That is, before tangible definitions of desensitization or of other, longer-lasting phases of nAChR functional loss can be formulated beyond postulated conversions of
agonist-receptor complexes to inactive forms, explanations for these
phenomena require refinement.
Although most studies have shown functional loss for
4
2-nAChR on
sustained exposure to nicotine, a recent electrophysiological study of
human
4
2-nAChR heterologously expressed in a mammalian human
embryonic kidney-derived cell line reported an enhancement of function
under some experimental conditions following chronic exposure to
nicotine (Buisson and Bertrand, 2001
). This finding poses new questions
about whether and how different expression systems and details of
experimental design influence functional responsiveness of individual
nAChR subtypes to chronic nicotinic ligand exposure.
This study examines functional responses of human
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR heterologously expressed in the SH-EP1 human epithelial line following pretreatment with nicotinic ligands. Whereas the
4
2-nAChR subtype is of obvious importance, nAChR
4 subunit messages as detected by in situ hybridization in nonhuman primate brain
also are abundant and colocalize with
4 subunit messages (Quik et
al., 2000
). Moreover,
4 and
4 subunits combine to form a
functional nAChR ion channel with high affinity for nicotine (Eaton et
al., 2000
). The current studies examined and contrasted effects of
nicotine as a membrane-permeant agonist, carbamylcholine (carb)
as an ionic nAChR agonist, and mecamylamine (mec) as a prototypical
nAChR antagonist with potential as an aid to smoking cessation (Rose et
al., 1998
) and a therapeutic (Sanberg et al., 1997
). A preliminary
report of these findings has appeared (Gentry and Lukas, 2001
).
 |
Materials and Methods |
Drug Dilutions.
All drugs were prepared fresh on the day of
the assay as 10 mM stock solutions in cell culture medium (see cell
culture) and diluted appropriately for each experiment. Efflux assay
buffer consisted of 130 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 5 mM glucose, and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Ringer's buffer consisted of 115 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 1.3 mM MgSO4, and 33 mM Tris supplemented with 1.5 mM NaN3. Buffer
components as well as (
)-nicotine bitartrate, carb Cl, and mec HCl
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Model Cell Lines and Cell Culture.
The present study used
low-passage (less than 50) SH-EP1 human epithelial cell clones stably
and heterologously expressing human
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs to
examine functional responsiveness of receptors following pretreatment
with nicotine or other nicotinic ligands. These clonal cell lines were
generated using techniques that have been previously reported (Peng et
al., 1999
; Eaton et al., 2000
; Lukas et al., 2002
). Briefly,
transfection with pcDNA3.1-zeo-human
4 and pcDNA3.1-hygro-human
2
constructs created in our laboratory [subcloned using human
4(S452)
and
2 subunit cDNAs kindly provided by Dr. Ortrud Steinlein,
Rheinishce-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitaet, Bonn, Germany] followed by
isolation of a stable, high-expressing clonal line was accomplished to
create SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells. Transfection with pCEP4-hygro-human
4
and pcDNA3.1-zeo-human
4 constructs created in our laboratory (the
latter was subcloned using a human
4 subunit cDNA kindly provided by
Dr. Jon Lindstrom, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) also,
followed by isolation of a high-expressing clone, was used to generate
SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells. Cells were maintained at 37°C, under 95%
O2/5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 10% horse serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 1% sodium pyruvate (Cellgro AK; Mediatech Inc., Herndon, VA), 2% glutamine penicillin-streptomycin (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA), and 0.02% amphotericin B (Sigma). Cell culture medium
was also supplemented with 0.01% hygromycin (Calbiochem, San Diego,
CA) and 0.03% zeocin (Invitrogen) to maintain stable expression of
4 and
2 or
4 subunits.
Assays of nAChR Function.
86Rb+ efflux assays (Lukas
and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas et al., 2002
) were performed using
SH-EP1-h
4
2 or SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells with some assay
modifications to account for the nicotinic ligand pretreatment protocol. Cells were cultured (~2 × 105
cells per 15.5-mm-diameter well; ~150 µg of total cell protein per
well) on Falcon 24-well culture plates (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA)
precoated with poly(D-lysine), mol. wt. 70,000 to 150,000 (Sigma). Cells were grown overnight to confluence, verified using light
microscopy. 86RbCl (3.8 mCi/mg or 0.2 cpm/fmol at
40% counting efficiency) was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences
(Boston, MA).
In all cases, cells were loaded with 0.5 ml of serum- and
antibiotic-supplemented cell culture medium also supplemented with 86Rb+ (~2 µCi per well)
for 4 h or longer to ensure maximal
86Rb+ uptake by the cells.
Control samples were not subjected to ligand pretreatment but were
otherwise processed identically. For 1-, 15-, or 60-min drug
pretreatments, medium containing
86Rb+ only was removed and
replaced at specific times with medium containing 86Rb+ plus the appropriate
concentration of drug. For 24-h drug pretreatments, medium containing
drug only was removed after 20 h and replaced for the final 4 h of pretreatment with medium containing
86Rb+ plus the appropriate
concentration of drug. Cells were kept in incubators in 5%
CO2 at 37°C for drug pretreatments of more than 5 min and for 86Rb+ loading
except during medium changes.
At the end of any drug pretreatment and
86Rb+ loading period,
medium was removed by aspiration to mark the beginning of the recovery period, and the "flip plate" (Lukas et al., 2002
) method was
employed to administer three rinses with 2 ml per well of drug- and
86Rb+-free efflux assay
buffer (22°C for recovery times of 5 min or less, 37°C for recovery
times greater than 5 min) to remove extracellular 86Rb+ and pretreatment
drug. For rinse times of 3 min or more, the first rinse solution was
applied for 1 min, the second rinse solution was applied for 1 min, and
the third rinse solution was applied for the remainder of the
experimentally defined length of time (1 min for 3-min recovery, 3 min
for 5-min recovery, etc.). Each of the three rinses was for 20 s
for 1-min recovery samples.
After the experimentally defined periods of recovery from ligand
exposure, efflux assays were used to evaluate nAChR function. Some
wells of cells on each 24-well cell culture plate were reserved for
controls. Total 86Rb+
efflux (or positive control condition) was defined by cells not exposed
to ligand pretreatment and only exposed for 2 min to 1 ml of 1 mM carb
alone in efflux buffer ("acute agonist challenge"). Nonspecific
86Rb+ efflux was defined
using other control samples exposed to efflux buffer alone or to efflux
buffer containing both 1 mM carb and 100 µM d-tubocurarine
(either negative control approach gave comparable results).
Simultaneously, wells of cells that had received ligand pretreatment
were exposed to 1 ml of 1 mM carb alone in efflux buffer for the 2-min
acute agonist challenge period.
At the end of the efflux period, buffer samples were collected, and
amounts of 86Rb+ released
into extracellular fluids were quantified by Cerenkov counting using a
Wallac Trilux system (40% efficiency) (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). One
milliliter per well of 0.1% SDS/0.1 M NaOH was then added to lyse the
cells and to prepare samples for determination of the amounts of
remaining, intracellular
86Rb+ (see Data
Analysis below). Specific nAChR function was defined as total
minus nonspecific 86Rb+
efflux. Typical values for specific and nonspecific
86Rb+ efflux in control
cells not subjected to ligand pretreatment were 2500 cpm and 500 cpm,
respectively, for SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells (loaded with 3000 cpm of
350,000 cpm of applied
86Rb+) and 3500 cpm and 400 cpm, respectively, for SH-EP1-h
4
4 cells (loaded with 5000 cpm of
350,000 cpm of applied
86Rb+).
Conditions for 86Rb+ Loading.
Prior
to initiating experiments, a control study compared effects of three
different methods for 15-min ligand pretreatment: 1) simply adding a
concentrated aliquot of ligand in media to cells maintained in
86Rb+ loading media, 2)
using the flip plate method to replace
86Rb+ loading media with
86Rb+-free media containing
ligand, and 3) using the flip plate method to apply ligand in
86Rb+ loading medium.
Regardless of the method used, double-normalized results obtained (see
Data Analysis below) were nearly identical (data not shown).
This indicated that final results were not influenced by differences in
86Rb+ loading during ligand pretreatment.
Data Analysis.
To control for possible influences of ligand
pretreatment and recovery conditions on
86Rb+ loading, data were
subjected to a double normalization process. Background radioactivity
was subtracted from all samples. Amounts of
86Rb+ loaded and present
intracellularly at the start of the acute agonist challenge to initiate
the functional efflux assay were determined as the sum for each sample
of released (extracellular) and remaining (intracellular)
86Rb+ present at the
conclusion of the functional assay. Specific
86Rb+ efflux was defined as
total 86Rb+ efflux minus
nonspecific 86Rb+ efflux
(described above). Normalized specific
86Rb+ efflux was then
expressed as a percentage of specific
86Rb+ efflux divided by
86Rb+ loaded. Double
normalized specific 86Rb+
efflux was then expressed as a percentage of normalized specific 86Rb+ efflux for
experimental samples subjected to ligand pretreatment divided by
normalized specific 86Rb+
efflux for control samples not subjected to ligand pretreatment. Data
were plotted as means ± S.E.M. using Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Results from three or more independent experiments are shown. Appropriate to sample size and degrees of
freedom, unpaired t tests (two comparisons) or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests (three comparisons) or
Tukey's post hoc tests (greater than three comparisons) were used to
evaluate statistical significance of important data sets. Most of the
statistically significant differences between and within panels of data
are obvious, but statistically significant differences that are not as
evident are specified in the narrative, whereas remarks about similarity between such sets of data refer to differences that are not
statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval.
Radiolabeled Epibatidine Binding Studies.
Competition for
[3H]epibatidine (EBDN) binding sites on cell
membranes prepared from SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells (Lukas et al., 2002
) was
utilized as a sensitive method for quantifying residual nicotine in
efflux buffer samples collected during successive rinses of cells
pretreated for 48 h with nicotine. Assays were performed in a
total volume of 200 µl of Ringer's buffer in a 96-well plate format.
Each well used to define the concentration of nicotine in one rinse
sample of efflux buffer by competition for EBDN binding sites contained
50 µl of a 400 pM concentration of EBDN (final concentration = 100 pM), 50 µl of efflux buffer from one rinse sample, and 100 µl
of SH-EP1-
4
2 cell membrane suspension (diluted to ensure that
binding site concentrations were no more than 10 pM). Total control
binding was defined as the binding of EBDN in the absence of any rinse
sample, which was substituted for by a 50-µl aliquot of
Ringer's-NaN3 buffer. Following a 1-h incubation at room temperature (~22°C), cell membrane-bound EBDN was separated from unbound EBDN using a cell harvester system (Inotech Biosystems International, Inc., Rockville, MD) by filtration through GF/C glass
fiber filters (Inotech Biosystems International, Inc.) that had been
presoaked in a 0.1% polyethyleneimine solution at 4°C for at least
30 min. Cell membranes embedded in the filters were subsequently rinsed
twice with ice-cold Ringer's buffer before being transferred to Ready
Safe Liquid Scintillation Cocktail (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton,
CA) for determination of [3H] content by
coincidence counting on a Wallac MicroBeta TriLux microplate liquid
scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Counts obtained were
transformed for presentation to a percentage of control specific EBDN
binding defined in each assay.
 |
Results |
Determination of Residual Drug Levels.
Because a recurring
technical critique of some studies of effects of chronic drug treatment
regards possible effects of residual pretreatment drug on the parameter
being measured, experiments were conducted to ensure that the rinse
method used in our nicotine pretreatment-acute challenge protocol was
sufficient to remove pretreatment ligands, thereby allowing nAChR to
recover from effects of drug pretreatment in a drug-free environment.
Other studies showed that rinses of 30- to 60-s duration were adequate
to allow equilibration in nicotine distribution between intra- and
extracellular spaces (J. Fryer and R. D. Lukas, unpublished
observations). Independent experiments were completed to measure
residual nicotine levels present in buffers used to rinse
SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells after nicotine pretreatment based on the ability
of residual drug to activate nAChR-mediated
86Rb+ efflux from fresh
SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells (Fig. 1). These
functional assays demonstrated that nicotine levels in first-rinse
samples were >100-fold lower than the initial nicotine concentration
(i.e., there was a more than 2 log unit, rightward shift in the
dose-response profile for the first-rinse sample from that for acute
nicotine effects). Residual nicotine present in second-rinse samples
elicited ion flux only if initial nicotine concentrations were 1 mM,
but with efficacy equivalent to 0.3 to 1 µM nicotine, indicating a 1000- to 3000-fold removal of drug. Levels of residual nicotine present
in third-rinse samples had been reduced to below those capable of
eliciting any 86Rb+ efflux;
i.e., below 100 nM, a greater than 10,000-fold reduction. The
efficiency of removal of nicotine in the second rinse appeared to be
slightly lower following longer pretreatment times of 1 or 48 h
relative to 20 s of nicotine pretreatment, but no pretreatment time-dependent difference in nicotine removal was observed after the
third rinse. Thus, three rinses were routinely used to process samples.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Functional bioassay to assess effectiveness of
removal of pretreatment nicotine. SH-EP1 cells heterologously
expressing human 4 2-nAChR were pre-exposed to nicotine at the
indicated concentration (abscissa, log M scale) for 20 s (top),
1 h (center), or 48 h (bottom). Pre-exposure medium was
aspirated, and the pre-exposed cells were subjected to four successive
rinses of 2 ml of drug-free assay buffer. The first rinse was for 1 min, and each subsequent rinse was for 2 min. Biologically active
nicotine in the rinse buffers was assayed based on its ability to
elicit function of human 4 2-nAChRs heterologously expressed in
fresh SH-EP1 cells not previously exposed to nicotine (specific
86Rb+ efflux; ordinate, percentage of control;
see Materials and Methods). nAChR function was measured
in the presence of fresh, acute nicotine ( ) to generate a standard
curve or in buffers collected from successive cell rinses (first rinse,
; 2nd rinse, ; third rinse, ; fourth rinse, ). Smooth
curves were drawn through data points, which are means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments. Concentration-response
profiles were used to determine nicotine levels in rinse buffers based
on comparison with the standard curve and indicate progressively lower
levels of residual nicotine with each rinse.
|
|
Additional and more sensitive bioassays using competition toward EBDN
binding (see Materials and Methods) also were applied to
quantify residual nicotine. Findings from these studies confirmed that
third-rinse media contained nicotine at concentrations no higher than
10 nM (Fig. 2). Thus, three successive
rinses with 2 ml per well of drug-free efflux buffer for a period of 1 min or greater reduced the concentration of drug in the media to a concentration below that capable of eliciting any nAChR channel opening
detectable using ion flux assays.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Evaluation of residual nicotine levels after cell
pretreatment based on radioligand binding competition assays. SH-EP1
cells heterologously expressing human 4 2-nAChRs were pre-exposed
to nicotine at the indicated concentration (abscissa, log M scale) for
48 h. Samples were processed and rinse medium was collected as
described in the legend to Fig. 1. Biologically active nicotine
collected in rinse buffers was tested based on its ability to inhibit
specific [3H]epibatidine binding (ordinate, percentage of
control; see Materials and Methods) to cellular membrane
fractions from fresh SH-EP1-h 4 2 cells. Assays done in the acute
presence of fresh nicotine ( ) were used to generate a standard
nicotine dose-inhibition curve against which pretreatment nicotine
dose-inhibition curves were compared for samples from successive cell
rinses (first rinse, ; second rinse, ; third rinse, ; fourth
rinse, ). Smooth curves were drawn through data points, which were
means ± S.E.M. from at least two separate experiments.
Concentration-response profiles were used to determine nicotine levels
in rinse buffers based on comparison with the standard curve and
indicate progressively lower levels of residual nicotine with each
rinse.
|
|
It is possible that residual nicotine at concentrations of 10 nM
(achieved after ~5 log unit reduction from an initial preincubation concentration of 1 mM) might be capable of stabilizing nonfunctioning nAChR conformers. However, an ~5 log unit reduction from pretreatment concentrations on the order of 1 µM would yield residual nicotine concentration closer to 10 pM, much lower than the apparent binding affinity of nicotine for desensitized nAChR. Thus, demonstrated efficiency of the rinse protocol mitigates against, and at least establishes boundary conditions for, a role for residual pretreatment drug in long-lasting effects of drug pretreatment on nAChR function.
Effects of Nicotine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
Effects of prolonged nicotine exposure on
heterologously expressed
4
2-nAChRs were examined.
4
2-nAChRs
are the predominant form of high-affinity nicotine binding site in the
brain, making them not only physiologically and pharmacologically
important, but also the most likely effectors in nicotine dependence.
Pre-exposure of SH-EP1-h
4
2 cells for 1 min to nicotine at
concentrations as low as 1 µM produced an ~20% loss of human
4
2-nAChR function when tested with an acute challenge dose of
carb after 1 min of recovery from nicotine pre-exposure (Fig.
3, top-left). Losses of function for
1-min pretreatment with 1 or 10 µM nicotine reversed (i.e., function
elicited by an acute challenge dose of carb returned to control levels)
after 1 h of recovery. However, after 1 h (or less) of
recovery, losses of function were still evident in cells pre-exposed to
100 µM (~20% loss for 1-h recovery) or 1 mM (~30% loss for 1-h
recovery) nicotine. In the absence of tangible definitions of
desensitization and phases of longer-lasting losses of nAChR function
induced by sustained nicotinic agonist exposure, explicit, operational
definitions provided by Ke et al. (1998)
distinguishing desensitization
as a loss of nAChR function that is reversed during a 5-min period of
recovery from agonist exposure from persistent inactivation, which was
defined as a loss of nAChR function that is not reversed during a 5-min
period of recovery from agonist exposure, were applied for their
empirical utility. Thus, levels of persistent inactivation surviving
the 5-min recovery period were ~10% for pretreatment with 1 µM
nicotine and ~55% for pretreatment with 1 mM nicotine.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of nicotine
exposure on function of 4 2-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 2-nAChRs were pre-exposed to
nicotine at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min (top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left) or 24 h
(bottom-right). Pre-exposure medium was aspirated and the pre-exposed
cells were subjected to three successive rinses with 2 ml of drug-free
assay buffer. The first and second rinses were for 1 min, and the third
rinse consumed the remainder of the experimentally defined recovery
time. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min ( ), 15 min
( ), 30 min ( ), or 60 min ( ). Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control),
measured as described under Materials and Methods, was
determined by eliciting nAChR function using acute (2 min) exposure to
1 mM carb. A 100% response was defined by untreated control cells'
response to 1 mM carb. Linear curves are drawn through data points
(means ± S.E.M. from at least three separate experiments). Over
much of the dose profile, 1-min pretreatment results were significantly
different from other results for either 15-min, or 1- or 24-h
pretreatments. One- and 24-h pretreatment results were not
statistically different from each other (ANOVA followed by Tukey's
post hoc test, p < 0.05).
|
|
Extending the nicotine pretreatment period led to progressively
longer-lasting and greater
4
2-nAChR functional losses, such that
doses of nicotine as low as 10 nM (compare to smoker plasma/brain levels of 100 nM-1 µM) induced losses of nAChR function (Fig. 3).
Following nicotine exposure for 15 min,
4
2-nAChR exhibited a
decline in functional responsiveness at pretreatment doses as low as
100 nM, 75% of
4
2-nAChR function was lost following exposure to
1 µM nicotine, and pretreatment with nicotine at 10 µM or greater
caused nearly total loss of receptor function (Fig. 3, top-right).
Whereas the functional loss resulting from pretreatment with 10 µM
nicotine recovered almost completely within 1 h, nAChRs exposed to
1 mM nicotine regained only 20% of their function following 1 h
in drug-free buffer. After 5 min of recovery, the extent of persistent
inactivation varied between ~15% for 100 nM nicotine pretreatment
and ~90% for pre-exposure to 1 mM nicotine.
Following a 1-h pretreatment (compared with 1- or 15-min pretreatment)
with nicotine, additional functional decline was observed throughout
the dose range examined (Fig. 3, bottom-left). The most remarkable
effects were those at lower concentrations of nicotine. Pre-exposure to
10 nM nicotine caused ~60% loss of
4
2-nAChR function at 1 min
of recovery, ~20% functional loss that persisted after 30 min of
recovery, and ~10% functional loss evident after 1 h of
recovery. Losses in function at higher doses of nicotine pretreatment
were even greater. Overall, for 1-h pretreatment, persistent
inactivation remaining after 5 min of recovery ranged from ~50% at
10 to 100 nM nicotine to no recovery of
4
2-nAChR response after 1 mM nicotine exposure.
Functional profiles for
4
2-nAChRs pretreated with nicotine for
24 h and allowed to recover for times ranging from 1 min to 1 h were similar to profiles for 1-h pretreatment (Fig. 3, bottom-right).
One-hour recovery was sufficient to bring receptors exposed to 10 µM
or less of nicotine back to levels of function matching that of
untreated control cells. However, for the 5-min recovery period, losses
of function ranged between ~45% for 10 nM nicotine pretreatment and
~100% for pre-exposure to 1 mM nicotine.
Effects of Nicotine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
Studies of effects of chronic nicotine
exposure on function of human
4
4-nAChRs were also conducted
because nAChR
4 subunit messages in nonhuman primate brain have been
reported to be abundant and to colocalize with
4 subunit messages
and because human
4
4-nAChRs also have high affinity for nicotine.
Upon prolonged nicotine exposure, heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs in transfected SH-EP1 cells became less responsive to
subsequent activation by 1 mM carb (Fig.
4), and patterns of functional changes
were similar to those of
4
2-nAChRs. Following 1 min of exposure
to 1 mM nicotine, an ~75% reduction in efflux from
4
4-nAChRs
was observed (Fig. 4, top-left). Functional response remained at
~50% of normal when cells were allowed to recover for 1 h in
drug-free buffer. A dose of 100 µM nicotine led to ~50% reduction
in
4
4-nAChR function that did recover substantially (to ~20%
loss) following 1 h in drug-free buffer. One-minute pretreatment
with nicotine at 1 µM or less did not induce persistent inactivation.
Five-minute recovery allowed
4
4-nAChR function to return to
~80%, 70%, or 40% of control, respectively, after 10 µM, 100 µM, or 1 mM nicotine pre-exposure.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of nicotine
exposure on function of 4 4-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 4-nAChR were pre-exposed to
nicotine at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min (top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left), or 24 h (bottom-right). Samples were processed as described in the legend to
Fig. 3. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min ( ), 15 min ( ), 30 min ( ), or 60 min ( ). Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control)
was measured as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments). Results were not
significantly different for 1- or 24-h pretreatments at equivalent
nicotine doses and recovery times, but these results and results from
1- and 15-min pretreatments were significantly different from each
other over the entire dose profile (ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc
test, p < 0.01).
|
|
4
4-nAChRs exposed to nicotine for 15 min showed slightly greater
functional decline than was observed following only 1 min of nicotine
exposure and slightly less functional loss than was observed for
4
2-nAChRs following an equivalent nicotine exposure (Fig. 4,
top-right).
4
4-nAChR function did not return to normal following
1 h of recovery in drug-free buffer except when pretreatment nicotine concentration was less than 100 nM. Persistent inactivation was observed at all doses tested (10 nM-1 mM).
Increasing the pretreatment time to 1 or 24 h led to greater loss
of function for
4
4-nAChRs (Fig. 4, bottom, left and right). For
example, 24-h nicotine pretreatment and 1-min recovery was significantly different from 1-min pretreatment and 1-min recovery (p < 0.05). Effects at 10 or 100 nM nicotine became
more profound. Losses of function were ~35 to 80% after 1-min
recovery and remained at ~10 to 25% after 1-h recovery. Pretreatment
with 1 µM nicotine for 1 h followed by 1 min of recovery
produced ~75% loss of receptor function, and increasing the
pretreatment time to 24 h completely eliminated responses to
subsequent carb challenge. Function was entirely lost for 1- or 24-h
pretreatment with 10 µM to 1 mM nicotine after 1 min of recovery,
although function returned to between 30 and 89% of control after
1 h in drug-free medium. Using the persistent inactivation
criteria, losses in function after 5-min recovery ranged between
~30% at 10 nM nicotine and ~90% at 1 mM nicotine.
To summarize the results of nicotine pre-exposure on
4
2- and
4
4-nAChRs, the extent of functional loss for each subtype depended on duration of nicotine pretreatment, duration of recovery in
nicotine-free buffer, and concentration of nicotine during pretreatment. Loss of nAChR function occurred following pretreatment with low (10-100 nM) concentrations of nicotine, but only for pretreatment times of 15 min or longer.
Effects of Carbamylcholine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
carb was chosen for study as a
representative ionic agonist to allow comparisons of its ability and
that of nicotine as a membrane-permeant agonist to induce changes in
nAChR function. One-minute pretreatments with 0.1 or 1 mM carb caused a
reduction in heterologously expressed, human
4
2-nAChR function of
15% and 25%, respectively, when measured with a subsequent, acute carb challenge (Fig. 5, top-left). In
both cases, receptor function fully recovered within 30 min. One-min
pretreatment with carb concentrations of 10 µM or less had no effect.
Only 100 µM or 1 mM pretreatments produced persistent inactivation.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of carb
exposure on function of 4 2-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 2-nAChRs were pre-exposed to
carb at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min
(top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left) or 24 h
(bottom-right). Otherwise, samples were processed as described in the
legend to Fig. 3. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min
( ), 15 min ( ), 30 min ( ), or 60 min ( ). Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control)
was measured as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments). For 1-min pretreatments at
equivalent carb doses and recovery times, results were significantly
different (less functional loss for 1-min pretreatment) for 1-min
recovery at high carb doses, but 15-min, 60-min, and 24-h pretreatments
were not significantly different from each other across the dose
profile (ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test,
p < 0.01). Comparing results for studies of
4 2-nAChR, carb pretreatment produced significantly less
functional inhibition across all dose profiles compared with effects of
nicotine under equivalent dose and pretreatment and recovery times
(ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test,
p < 0.05) (see Fig. 3).
|
|
Fifteen-minute pretreatment with 1 mM carb reduced
4
2-nAChR
function by more than 80% (Fig. 5, top-right). Following a 1-h recovery period,
4
2-nAChR function had returned to 75% of
untreated control. With a 15-min pretreatment, functional effects were
seen at concentrations as low as 10 µM. The 30% reduction in
4
2-nAChR function observed under these conditions recovered fully
within 15 min. However, 15-min pre-exposure to carb at concentrations between 10 nM and 1 µM produced no functional loss, although
4
2-nAChR persistent inactivation of ~25%, ~50%, and ~70%
was observed for pre-exposure to 10 µM, 100 µM, and 1 mM carb, respectively.
An additional decline in receptor function was observed following 1-h
pretreatment with carb (Fig. 5, bottom-left) when compared with 15 min
of pretreatment. Most notable differences included some functional loss
at lower concentrations (100 nM-1 µM carb) and an increase in the
extent of functional loss at higher concentrations, e.g., to 100% for
1-h pretreatment with 1 mM carb followed by 1-min recovery. However,
persistent inactivation was detectable at doses as low as 100 nM.
Functional dose-response profiles for
4
2-nAChR inactivation
following 24-h pretreatment with carb and 1-min recovery were similar
to the profiles for 1-h pretreatment and equivalent times of recovery
(Fig. 5, bottom-right).
Effects of Carbamylcholine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
Following 1 min of carb exposure,
heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs functioned normally
except when pretreated with concentrations of carb greater than 100 µM (Fig. 6, top-left). One-minute
exposure to 1 mM carb and 1-min recovery led to a reduction of efflux
response (~20% decline). Receptor function returned to normal after
30 min in drug-free buffer. Greater
4
4-nAChR functional effects
were observed following 15 min of carb exposure (Fig. 6, top-right).
After 1 h of incubation, pretreatment concentrations of carb as
low as 10 µM began to have an effect on
4
4-nAChR function (Fig.
6, bottom-left), although function recovered fully within 1 h of
drug-free recovery. Functional losses of ~60 to 70% occurred for 1-h
pretreatment with 0.1 to 1 mM carb, and function recovered to only
~80% of control after 1 h of recovery. Increasing carb exposure
time from 1 to 24 h did not change
4
4-nAChR functional inactivation (Fig. 6, bottom-right), although the range for functional loss remaining at 1 h of recovery extended to 100 nM carb (~10% loss; ~25% at 0.01 to 1 mM carb). Persistent inactivation first became evident for 1-min pretreatment with 1 mM carb, for 15 min to
1 h of pretreatment with 10 µM carb, or for 24-h pretreatment with 100 nM carb.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of carb
exposure on function of 4 4-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 4-nAChRs were pre-exposed to
carb at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min
(top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left), or 24 h
(bottom-right). Otherwise, samples were processed as described in the
legend to Fig. 3. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min
( ), ( ) 15 min, ( ) 30 min, or ( ) 60 min. Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control)
was measured as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments). Linear curves are drawn
through data points (means ± S.E.M. from at least three separate
experiments). Results were not significantly different for 1- or 24-h
pretreatments at equivalent carb doses and recovery times, but these
profiles and those for 1- and 15-min pretreatments were significantly
different from each other across the dose profile (ANOVA followed by
Tukey's post hoc test, p < 0.05). carb
pretreatment produced significantly less functional loss of
4 4-nAChR than did nicotine under all otherwise equivalent
conditions tested (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test,
p < 0.05) (see Fig. 4). Moreover, 1-min or 15-min
carb pretreatment produced significantly greater functional loss for
4 2-nAChR than for 4 4-nAChR (unpaired t test,
p < 0.01) (see Fig. 5).
|
|
In summary, differences were observed in carb-treated
4
2- and
4
4-nAChRs when increasing pretreatment time and concentration. Differences were also observed between
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR
responses to 1-min or 15-min carb treatment, with
4
2-nAChRs
showing greater sensitivity to carb-induced functional loss (unpaired
t test, p < 0.01).
Effects of Mecamylamine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
2-nAChR Function.
Studies were done to determine whether
chronic exposure to mec could induce long-lasting nAChR functional
changes, in part because of its potential utility as a smoking
cessation aid and therapeutic, but also because its noncompetitive
antagonism might occur through open-channel block, possibly mimicking
effects of nicotine acting at high concentrations and/or chronically.
Pretreatment with mec induced functional losses in heterologously
expressed, human
4
2-nAChRs that persisted after removal of the
drug from media (Fig. 7). It should be
noted, however, that experiments evaluating effectiveness of rinses for
removing mec after pretreatment (not shown) indicated that our protocol
yielded an ~1000-fold reduction in mec concentration, meaning that
for samples pretreated with 1 mM mec, enough residual drug could remain
to antagonize as much as 50% of receptor function. Nevertheless, these
studies showed that residual mec levels would be less than those needed to acutely produce nAChR functional block if pretreatment with mec was
done at concentrations of 100 µM or less. Therefore, although efficiency of mec removal was lower than for removal of nicotine, any
functional loss observed following pretreatment with lower concentrations of mec can be attributed to desensitization and/or persistent inactivation rather than channel block.
4
2-nAChRs were
functioning at 25% of normal following 100 µM mec pre-exposure for 1 min and 1 min of recovery, but 5 to 60 min of recovery allowed function
to return to ~85% of control levels (Fig. 7, top-left). Pretreatment
for 1 min with mec at concentrations less than 10 µM had negligible
effects on
4
2-nAChR function. Persistent inactivation evident
after 5 min of recovery was about 15% for 1-min pretreatment with 10 µM mec.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of mec
exposure on function of 4 2-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 2-nAChRs were pre-exposed to mec
at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min
(top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left) or 24 h
(bottom-right). Otherwise, samples were processed as described in the
legend to Fig. 3. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min
( ), 15 min ( ), 30 min ( ), or 60 min ( ). Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control)
was measured as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments). Results for 1- or 24-h
pretreatments at equivalent mec doses and recovery times were not
significantly different, but these profiles and those for 1- and 15-min
pretreatments were significantly different from each other across the
dose profile (ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test,
p < 0.01). mec produced less functional loss of
4 2-nAChR than did nicotine, but more than carb, across virtually
all conditions (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test,
p < 0.01; see Figs. 3 and 5).
|
|
After 1 min of recovery from 15-min pre-exposure to 10 µM mec,
function was ~75% of control, but 1 h after drug removal,
function was at control levels (100%). Pretreatment with mec for
1 h led to receptor inactivation occurring at lower concentrations
(Fig. 7, bottom-left). For example, pretreatment with mec at
concentrations as low as 10 nM led to
4
2-nAChR functional loss of
25%, although this effect was fully reversed within 30 min of recovery
in drug-free media. One hour was insufficient for complete recovery
from functional loss after pretreatment with mec of concentrations 1 µM or higher. Defined as the loss of function after 5 min of drug
removal, persistent inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs ranged from ~10%
at 10 nM mec to ~90% at 100 µM mec. Concentration-response
profiles following 24-h mec pretreatment were similar to those
following 1 h of mec exposure (Fig. 7, bottom-right). Persistent
inactivation ranged from 20% at 100 nM mec to ~100% at 10 µM mec
or higher.
Effects of Mecamylamine Pretreatment on SH-EP1 Cell Human
4
4-nAChR Function.
One minute of pretreatment with as much
as 10 µM mec had no effect on subsequently assessed function of
heterologously expressed, human
4
4-nAChRs (Fig.
8, top-left). Following 1 min of 1 mM mec
exposure and 1-min recovery,
4
4-nAChR functional response was
50% of untreated control. Functional assessment after 5 min of
recovery found
4
4-nAChRs to function at 70% of normal, and recovery was to 95% of control after 0.5 to 1 h in drug-free
medium. No significant differences were observed if mec pretreatment
times were extended to 15 min (Fig. 8, top-right). One or 24 h of
pretreatment with 1 mM mec yielded only modest increases in the extent
of functional loss (Fig. 8, bottom, left and right). However,
pre-exposure to 100 µM mec for 1 h induced an ~30% loss in
function, although recovery occurred within 5 to 60 min of drug-free
incubation.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Time- and concentration-dependent effects of nicotine
exposure on function of 4 4-nAChR measured using
86Rb+ efflux assays. SH-EP1 cells
heterologously expressing human 4 4-nAChRs were pre-exposed to mec
at the indicated concentrations (abscissa, log M scale) for 1 min
(top-left), 15 min (top-right), 1 h (bottom-left), or 24 h
(bottom-right). Otherwise, samples were processed as described in the
legend to Fig. 3. Recovery times were 1 min ( ), 3 min ( ), 5 min
( ), 15 min ( ), 30 min ( ), or 60 min ( ). Specific
86Rb+ efflux (ordinate, percentage of control)
was measured as described in the legend to Fig. 3 (means ± S.E.M.
from at least three separate experiments). Linear curves are drawn
through data points (means ± S.E.M. from at least three separate
experiments). Results were not significantly different for 1- or 15-min
pretreatments at equivalent mec doses and recovery times, but results
for pretreament for 1 h, compared with 1 or 15 min, at 100 µM
mec were significantly different for 1- and 3-min recovery times (ANOVA
followed by Tukey's post hoc test, p < 0.05). mec pretreatment produced significantly less functional loss of
4 4-nAChRs than did nicotine under all otherwise equivalent
conditions tested (see Fig. 4) and than did carb for 1- or 24-h
pretreatments (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test,
p < 0.01; see Fig. 6). For nearly all conditions
tested, mec pretreatment produced significantly greater functional loss
for 4 2-nAChRs than for 4 4-nAChRs (unpaired t
tests, p < 0.05; see Fig. 7).
|
|
In summary,
4
2-nAChRs exhibited a substantial reduction in
functional responsiveness following mec pretreatments, whereas
4
4-nAChRs were less vulnerable to persistent inactivation caused by mec exposure.
 |
Discussion |
Major Findings.
One of the major findings of this study is
that pre-exposure to nicotine induces losses in function of human
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs heterologously expressed in the SH-EP1
cell line. Losses in function, measured at maximally efficacious
challenge doses of acute agonist, are substantial after pretreatment
with concentrations of nicotine (~100 nM-1 µM) found in the plasma
of human smokers (Russell et al., 1980
). These losses in function are
even more pronounced after pretreatment at higher doses of nicotine,
i.e., at concentrations that have acute functional efficacy equivalent
to acetylcholine when acting at active synapses. Using the operational
definition of persistent inactivation as the loss of function after 5 min of drug-free incubation (Ke et al., 1998
), the present study found that 1 h of nicotine pretreatment at "smoker doses" of 100 nM to 1 µM induces 60 to 80% loss of human
4*-nAChR function, and recovery to 90% of control levels requires ~1 h after drug removal.
A second major finding is that carb is less effective than nicotine at
inducing functional loss of either
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs as
assessed by functional inactivation potency (dose dependence), rate of
functional inactivation (time dependence), and extent of functional
inactivation (percentage of functional loss for a given dose and time
of drug exposure). A third major finding is that human
4
2- and
4
4-nAChR subtypes differ in their sensitivity to functional
inactivation after mec pretreatment. Pretreatment with mec powerfully
induces functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs but has no lasting
effect on
4
4-nAChR function except when mec concentrations during
pretreatment are greater than 100 µM. These observations provide
insight into molecular bases for functional inactivation.
Ligand and nAChR Subtype Selectivity of Functional
Inactivation.
As an ionic species, carb does not freely traverse
the membrane lipid bilayer and gain access to the intracellular space
as readily as nicotine does. The finding that carb induces
4*-nAChR receptor desensitization and inactivation suggests that ligand access
to cytoplasmic or other buried domains is not required for functional
inactivation. Nevertheless, whether expressed in absolute terms or
normalized to agonist acute functional efficacy and potency, nicotine
has more persistent inactivation potency (1-h pretreatment, 5-min
recovery) than carb at either
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs (Table
1). This suggests that the ability of
nicotine to access the cell interior may indeed play a role in its
strong induction of persistent inactivation. Whether expressed
absolutely or after normalization to agonist acute potency, persistent
inactivation potency of carb is higher (>6- to >20-fold) at
4
2-
than at
4
4-nAChRs (Table 1), suggesting an influence of nAChR
subunit sequence on this effect.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Comparisons between nicotinic ligand functional inactivation and acute
activation/inhibition potencies
Concentrations of the indicated ligands acting at the specified nAChR
subtypes (column 1) needed to induce persistent inactivation (50% loss
of function after 1 h of drug pretreatment and 5 min of drug-free
recovery; PI-IC50 in µM; column 2) were compared with
concentrations needed to acutely induce 50% of maximal functional
activation (for agonists nicotine and carbamylcholine;
A-EC50 in µM; column 3) or to acutely inhibit
agonist-induced function by 50% (for the antagonist mecamylamine;
A-IC50 in µM; column 3). Persistent inhibition potency
normalized to acute ligand potency was then calculated as the
dimensionless ratio between persistent inactivation IC50
and either acute EC50 or IC50 values
[PI-IC50/A-EC(IC)50; column 4]. nAChR
function was determined using 86Rb+ efflux
assays (see Materials and Methods). Acute functional
EC50 or IC50 values are from Peng et al. (1999)
or Eaton et al. (2000) , respectively, for 4 2- or 4 4-nAChR,
and persistent inactivation IC50 values are from the
present study.
|
|
Absolute or normalized persistent inactivation potency for mec is lower
than that for nicotine but higher than that for carb at either
4
2- or
4
4-nAChRs (Table 1). The higher sensitivity of
4
2-nAChRs than
4
4-nAChRs to mec-induced persistent
inactivation (Table 1) implicates
2-
4 subunit sequence
differences in this effect. mec acts as an open-channel blocker of
nAChRs (Varanda et al., 1985
) and is not a steric inhibitor of
nicotinic agonist binding to
4
2- or
4
4-nAChR (Peng et al.,
1999
; Eaton et al., 2000
). Although it is possible that mec induces
persistent inactivation of spontaneously opening
4*-nAChRs or
activates transient channel openings not detected using contemporary
ion flux or electrophysiological measurements, our data with mec
suggest that channel opening is not required for conversion of
4*-nAChR to an inactivated state(s). Some noncompetitive antagonists
as well as agonists can induce desensitization and/or persistent
inactivation of other nAChR subtypes (Lukas, 1991
). As previously
discussed, open-channel blocking ability may be a common feature for
agonists and antagonists that produce functional inactivation, although
other possibilities include mutual interaction at novel regulatory
sites (Lukas, 1991
) or stabilization of distinct, closed-channel, nAChR
conformations (Changeux et al., 1990
). However, these conclusions are
based on the assumption that mec is efficiently removed from
association with
4*-nAChR after pretreatment, as was shown for nicotine.
Also of relevance is the finding that concentrations of nicotine below
those needed to acutely activate
4*-nAChR induce nAChR persistent
inactivation. This supports the hypothesis that channel activation is
not required for
4*-nAChR persistent inactivation. It also is
consistent with potential mechanisms involving open-channel block (but
of infrequently opening channels), allosteric interactions at distinct
ligand binding sites, or stabilization of
4*-nAChR in closed-channel states.
Comparisons to Other in Vitro Findings.
Findings in the
present study using the SH-EP1 human epithelial cell expression system
are consistent with numerous reports of functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChRs from different species in diverse experimental systems
following chronic nicotine exposure (Peng et al., 1994
; Hsu et al.,
1996
; Fenster et al., 1997
; Olale et al., 1997
). Other nAChR subtypes
that undergo functional inactivation following prolonged nicotine
exposure include human muscle-type
1*-nAChR naturally expressed in
TE671/RD cells,
7-nAChR and
3*-nAChR expressed in
Xenopus oocytes, and ganglionic
3*-nAChR naturally
expressed in rat PC12 or human SH-SY5Y cells (reviewed in Gentry and
Lukas, 2002
). Additionally, evidence from in vivo studies that allow
evaluation of nicotine effects and recovery times on the order of days
are consistent with the hypothesis that chronic nicotine inactivates
brain nAChR (reviewed in Gentry and Lukas, 2002
).
However, contrary to these and the current observations are reports
that function of human
4
2-nAChR heterologously expressed in the
K-177 cell variant of the HEK293 human embryonic kidney fibroblast cell
line can be up-regulated in response to nicotine (0.1-1 µM for 8 h-7 days), although exposure to 10 µM or higher nicotine produced
functional inactivation of
4
2-nAChR, whether measured using ion
flux or whole-cell electrophysiological recording (Gopalakrishnan et
al., 1997
; Buisson and Bertrand, 2001
). Reasons for these differences
are not immediately evident, although the choice(s) of agonist(s), the
concentration(s) of agonist(s) used for pretreatment and acute
functional assessment, and the experimental model (host cell
environment) used may be important factors. Use of oocyte as opposed to
mammalian cell expression systems, studies of native or heterologously
expressed nAChR, differences in temperature for cell maintenance,
culture medium composition (presence of serum), and presence of
kinases, phosphatases, or other means for post-translational
modification also may influence effects of chronic ligand exposure on
nAChR function (Buisson and Bertrand, 2001
). Additionally, species
differences, variations in pH, assay temperature, passage number (if
cell lines are used) and confluence of cells (amount of cell-to-cell
contact) (Boyd, 1987
), and subunit sequence variations may play a role
as well. Thus, more work is needed to reconcile whether there truly are
discrepant observations and/or diverse responses of
4
2-nAChRs to
chronic nicotine exposure and, if so, to elucidate the reasons for
these differences.
Relationships Between Chronic Nicotine-Induced Functional
Inactivation and nAChR Numerical Up-Regulation.
Several factors
can account for changes in the level of measurable nAChR function.
Among these are enhanced/reduced conductance of each channel,
enhanced/reduced frequency of channel opening, or
longer/shorter channel open time. Among these possibilities, changes
brought about by nicotinic ligands may be influenced by membrane lipid
composition effecting conformational equilibria of nAChR (Baenziger et
al., 2000
), electrostatic interactions (Song and Pedersen, 2000
),
enzymatic carboxymethylation (Kloog