![]() |
|
|
Vol. 303, Issue 3, 985-992, December 2002
Smooth Muscle Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied the actions of the proteinase-activated
receptor-2-activating peptide (PAR2-AP)
trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-amide (tc-LI) in femoral (FA),
renal, and small mesenteric (MA) arterial vessels from C57BL/6 [PAR2
(+/+)] and PAR2 (
/
) mice. The actions of tc-LI were compared with
those of the parent PAR2-AP Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-amide (SLIGRL-amide; SLI-NH2). Either SLI-NH2 or
tc-LI (0.1-10 µM) induced relaxation of either
9,11-dideoxy-9
,11
-methanoepoxy-prosta-5Z,13E-dien-1-oic acid (U46619)- or cirazoline-precontracted FA from PAR2 (+/+) in
endothelium-intact preparations but did not relax vessels from PAR2
(
/
) mice. This FA relaxation by SLI-NH2 and by tc-LI
was inhibited by 1) pretreatment with a combination of
L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) and
1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), 2) precontraction with 30 mM KCl, or 3) removal of the endothelium. In contrast, tc-LI caused an
L-NAME/ODQ/indomethacin-resistant relaxation of MA from
PAR2 (+/+) mice. In contrast with SLI-NH2, tc-LI (>30
µM) contracted arteries from both PAR2 (
/
) and PAR2 (+/+) mice.
Pretreatment of tissues with a combination of cyclopiazonic acid plus
caffeine reduced significantly tc-LI-induced contractions, whereas
nifedipine, CdCl2, and Ca2+-free conditions did
not. Inhibitors of vascular muscarinic,
1-adrenergic, neurokinin, thromboxane A2, histamine, angiotensin II, or
endothelin-1 receptors failed to inhibit contractions by 50 µM tc-LI.
At resting tension, SLI-NH2 (>10 µM) contracted all
arteries in an endothelium-independent manner but only from PAR2 (+/+)
mice. We conclude that the endothelium-dependent vasodilation initiated
by SLI-NH2 and tc-LI, but not the endothelium-independent contraction initiated by tc-LI, are due to the activation of PAR2. Indeed, the data from PAR2 (
/
) mice indicate that tc-LI, in addition to activating PAR2, is an agonist of vascular smooth muscle
contraction via a receptor different than PAR2.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proteinase-activated
receptors (PARs) are members of the heptahelical family of
G-protein-coupled receptors that contain seven putative transmembrane
domains (Coughlin, 2001
; Macfarlane et al., 2001
; Hollenberg and
Compton, 2002
). Their activation can result in an increased
intracellular calcium concentration
[Ca2+]i (Rasmussen et
al., 1991
; Nystedt et al., 1994
, 1995
; Molino et al., 1997
).
Proteolysis of the extracellular N terminus of PARs by serine
proteases, including thrombin and/or trypsin, reveal a characteristic
tethered ligand peptide sequence that is believed to interact with the
extracellular loop 2 of the receptor to initiate receptor activation
(Vu et al., 1991
; Coughlin et al., 1992
). Specific tethered ligand
sequences have been identified for each of the four PAR family members
(PAR1, PAR2, PAR3, and PAR4). Synthetic peptides based on the N
terminus proteolytically revealed that tethered ligand sequences have
been shown to be specific agonists for PAR1, PAR2, and PAR4 (Nystedt et
al., 1994
; Blackhart et al., 1996
; Hollenberg et al., 1997
; Kahn et
al., 1998
; Xu et al., 1998
; Kawabata et al., 1999
; Hollenberg and
Saifeddine, 2001
). Structure-activity relationships have also
led to the synthesis of chemically modified peptides that either are
equipotent to the revealed tethered ligand sequence [e.g.,
trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-NH2 (tc-LI) for
PAR2] or are receptor antagonists (e.g.,
N-trans-cinnamoyl-p-fluoro-F-p-guanidino-FLR-NH2 and trans-cinnamoyl-YPGKF-NH2
for PAR1 and PAR4, respectively) (Bernatowicz et al., 1996
; Hollenberg
et al., 1997
; Hollenberg and Saifeddine, 2001
).
PAR2-derived activating peptides (PAR2-APs) cause endothelium-dependent
relaxation of blood vessels, principally via activation of the
nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) expressed by endothelial cells (NOS3),
presumably a consequence of elevated
[Ca2+]i in these cells
(Saifeddine et al., 1996
; Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
; Sobey et al., 1999
;
Cicala, 2002
). In addition, a non-NOS/nonsoluble guanylyl cyclase
(sGC)/noncyclooxygenases (COX) endothelium-dependent PAR2-mediated
relaxation of murine-isolated resistance arteries has also been
recently described (McGuire et al., 2002
). Both endothelium-independent
contraction (mouse renal arteries) (Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
) and
endothelium-dependent contraction (rat pulmonary artery and human
umbilical vein) (Roy et al., 1998
) have been reported as vascular
responses to Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-amide (SLIGRL-NH2; SLI-NH2) in
vitro. In the former study, endothelium-independent contraction via
activation of PAR2 localized to vascular smooth muscle was demonstrated
by agonist cross-desensitization experiments (Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
).
An earlier study with the isolated aorta and femoral arteries from rats
reported the release of endothelin-1 by stimulation with PAR2-AP SLIGRL
(Magazine et al., 1996
). With respect to hemodynamics in vivo, the
duration, but not magnitude, of the blood pressure-lowering effect of
SLI-NH2 in anesthetized wild-type PAR2 mice was
decreased by pretreatment with NOS inhibitors but not by nonselective
COX inhibitors; the blood pressure-lowering effect was absent in PAR2
(
/
) mice (Damiano et al., 1999
).
In a study by Vergnolle et al. (1998)
, SLI-NH2
and tc-LI were found to be equipotent for eliciting the relaxation of
precontracted rat aorta and the activation of calcium-signaling in a
PAR2-transfected cell line, but the two peptides displayed a
significant difference in potency for activation of rat jejunal
chloride transport, as measured by short-circuit current in Ussing
chambers. The differences in the structure-activity relationships
observed for the jejunal chloride transport assay compared with the
other two assays (vascular relaxation and calcium signaling) were taken
as evidence for the activation of a non-PAR2 receptor in the jejunum by
PAR2-APs. Likewise, there is evidence demonstrating non-PAR2-mediated
contraction by SLI-NH2, but not tc-LI, in rat
pulmonary artery and human umbilical vein preparations (Roy et al.,
1998
; Saifeddine et al., 1998
).
The goals of our study were 1) to evaluate the vascular actions of tc-LI in murine arterial vessels in vitro and 2) to determine whether those effects could be ascribed to PAR2. Both mesenteric and renal arterial vessels served as controls for the known relaxant and contractile responses of murine PAR2 activation, whereas using the femoral artery extended our knowledge to a tissue in which the response to PAR2 activation was not known.
| |
Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. The following peptides were synthesized as carboxy-amides by the Peptide Synthesis Core Facility (University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada) and were purified by preparatory high-pressure liquid chromatography (>95% purity): SLI-NH2, tc-LI, LRGILS-amide, trans-cinnamoyl-OLRGIL-amide, and AYPGKF-amide. Stock solutions of all peptides and their dilutions were made in 25 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4. The concentration of the peptides and purity of all peptide stock solutions were verified by quantitative amino acid analysis and mass spectrometry. Apamin, atropine, BQ123, BQ788, caffeine, charybdotoxin, chlorpheniramine, cyclopiazonic acid, indomethacin, nifedipine, L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME), 1-H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), prazosin, and SQ29548 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Loius, MO). SR140333 and SR48968 were gifts from SANOFI Research Institute (Montpellier, France) to Dr. Nathalie Vergnolle (University of Calgary). Tetrodotoxin (without citrate) was purchased from Alamone (Jerusalem, Israel).
Animal Sources.
Wild-type genetic background male mouse
strains (C57BL/6J; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were used as
control animals and were matched for sizes when experiments were
conducted. Protocols for using animals were approved by the Animal
Resources Committee at the University of Calgary and were in accordance
with the guidelines of the Canadian Council for Animal Care in
Research. NOS3 (
/
) mice were also purchased from Jackson
Laboratories. PAR2 (
/
) mice, derived from C57BL/6 background, were
supplied by R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Spring
House, PA).
Bioassay Preparation. Male mice (8 to 16 weeks of age; 20-40 g) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and then the intestinal tissues, the kidneys with arteries and veins attached, or the quadriceps skeletal muscles containing femoral vein, artery, and nerve were removed and placed in ice-cooled modified Krebs' buffer. With the aid of a dissection light microscope, the second-order small mesenteric arteries (MA) (arterial segments separated by two branch points from the superior mesenteric artery), renal arteries, and femoral arteries were carefully isolated from surrounding tissue. Modified Krebs-bicarbonate solution was gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4 at 37°C) and had the following composition: 118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 0.87 mM MgSO4, 0.86 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, and 25 mM NaHCO3. Two to four rings (1- to 2-mm lengths) were cut from isolated blood vessels to be used for isometric tension measurements. Rings were suspended between a micropositioner and force transducer with gold-plated tungsten wires (20-µm diameter) in a Mulvany-Halpern-style organ bath (5 ml volume; 610 Multi-Myograph system; J.P. Trading, Copenhagen, Denmark). Isometric tension was recorded on-line via a serial connection to a computer hard drive at a rate of 1 Hz. Resting tension (1 mN for small mesenteric arteries or 1.5 mN for renal and femoral arteries) was fixed for an initial 1-h equilibration period. Software for data acquisition and analysis (Myodaq 2.01/Myodata 2.02) were designed by J.P. Trading for use with the 610 Multi-Myograph system.
Bioassay Protocols.
Tissues were routinely contracted with
60 to 120 mM KCl to determine their viability. Then tissues were
submaximally (50-75% of EMax)
precontracted with cirazoline (0.06-0.3 µM for femoral artery,
0.06-1 µM for renal artery, and 0.1-0.3 µM for MA), and the
response to either a single concentration (10 µM) or a cumulative concentration range (1 nM to 10 µM) was determined for ACh to assess
the responsiveness of the endothelium. Tissues from wild-type animals
and PAR2 (
/
) mice typically responded to ACh with >80% reversal
of precontracted tension. In experiments designed to determine the role
of the endothelium in the relaxation effects, a stainless steel
220-µm diameter wire was used to rub the interior surface of the
rings, thereby removing the endothelium. These tissues were deemed to
be endothelium-denuded only if there was no immediate relaxation
response to a single application of 10 µM ACh. Equilibration periods
between treatments and the incubation of inhibitors with tissues were
20 min each. Relaxation activity was determined by the reversal of a
submaximal precontraction induced by the contractile agonist;
contractions by either cirazoline or U46619 were 50 to 75% of a
maximal response, as determined by their maximal responses to U46619 or
cirazoline, whereas contractions by 30 mM KCl were about 30% of the
maximal response to 120 mM KCl. Either single concentrations (50 or 100 µM) or cumulative concentration-response relationships were
determined for SLI-NH2, tc-LI, and the
reversed-sequence control peptides LRGILS-NH2 and
trancinnamoyl-OLRGIL-NH2, respectively.
Data Analysis and Statistics. Arterial ring relaxant responses are reported on the graphs as a percentage of the initial tension (% initial tension) generated by the contractile agonists. Arterial ring contraction caused by peptides from the baseline tension were standardized as a percentage of maximal contraction generated by 120 mM KCl. The pD2 values for relaxation in response to PAR2-APs were determined from individual concentration-response relationships by manual graph interpolation. EMax values are reported as percent relaxation, whereby 100% relaxation represents a complete reversal of agonist-induced tone to baseline tension. Values represent the means ± S.E. mean (error bars) for 3 to 13 animals with two to four measurements per animal unless otherwise indicated. The comparisons of mean values for pD2 and EMax were made using either Student's t tests and one-way analysis of variance calculations (ANOVA) followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests (GraphPad Instat 2.01; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) or entire data sets by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc. Differences between means were considered significant if the Student's t test or post hoc tests indicated a p value less than 0.05.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SLI-NH2 and tc-LI Cause PAR2-Dependent Relaxation and
PAR2-Independent Contraction of Murine Femoral Arteries Precontracted
with either Cirazoline or U46619.
Initially, to assess the
vascular actions of PAR2-APs, we determined cumulative
concentration-response relationships for SLI-NH2 and tc-LI applied to cirazoline-precontracted femoral arteries from
C57BL/6J and PAR2 (
/
) mice. Both SLI-NH2 and
tc-LI caused a biphasic concentration-dependent response in femoral
arteries from C57BL/6J mice that included an initial relaxant effect
(0.1 to 10 µM) that was followed by a contractile effect at higher concentrations (Fig. 1, a and b). The
EMax and
pD2 values for SLI-NH2-induced relaxation of femoral arteries
from C67BL/6J (n = 7) mice were 70 ± 5% and 5.8 ± 0.2, respectively. The EMax and pD2 values for tc-LI-induced
relaxation of femoral arteries from C67BL/6J mice (n = 7)
were 78 ± 6% and 5.8 ± 0.1, respectively. In contrast, in
the femoral arteries preparations from PAR2 (
/
) mice, the addition
of PAR2-APs failed to cause relaxation but induced a further
contractile response of submaximal cirazoline-precontracted tissue
(Fig. 1c). The contractile responses to tc-LI (10 to 100 µM) were
significantly greater than the contractions elicited by equivalent
concentrations of SLI-NH2 in the cirazoline
precontracted femoral arteries of PAR2 (
/
) mice [Fig. 1c;
P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA followed by
(P < 0.01) Bonferroni post hoc].
|
/
) mice; nor were
these values different than the same values for the reversed-sequence peptides used with either C57BL/6J or PAR2 (
/
) mice (data not shown; p > 0.05 ANOVA). Including endothelin-1
(ETA and ETB) receptor antagonists (BQ123 and BQ788; 1 µM each) along with
L-NAME and ODQ did not significantly change the
contractile response of SLI-NH2 and tc-LI (Fig.
1, a and b). Both PAR2-APs caused similar responses in tissues
precontracted with the thromboxane A2-mimetic
U46619 instead of the
1-adrenoceptor agonist
cirazoline (data not shown).
Precontraction by 30 mM KCl Inhibits PAR2-Induced Relaxation
of Femoral Arteries, but Not Renal Arteries.
To determine the
effect of vascular smooth muscle membrane depolarization on the
relaxant activity of the PAR2-APs (i.e., relaxation mediated via
activation of K+ channels), femoral arteries from
C57BL/6J, NOS3 (
/
), and PAR2 (
/
) mice were precontracted by the
addition of 30 mM KCl (Fig. 2).
Precontraction of femoral arteries by depolarization with 30 mM KCl
reduced the relaxation by PAR2-APs in preparations from the PAR2 (+/+)
mice (Fig. 2a; p < 0.05, Student's unpaired
t test). Neither peptide caused a relaxation response in
femoral arteries from either NOS3 (
/
) or PAR2 (
/
) mice (Fig. 2,
b and c). The contractile responses elicited by tc-LI in femoral
arteries from background control (Fig. 2a), NOS3(
/
) (Fig. 2b), and
PAR2 (
/
) (Fig. 2c) mice were the same (P > 0.05;
two-way ANOVA). Similarly, whether complete blockade of vasodilator
activity by SLI-NH2 was caused by NOS/sGC
inhibitors (Fig. 1a) or by targeted gene deletions of either
NOS3(
/
) (Figs. 2b) or PAR2 (
/
) (Figs. 1c and 2c), the
contractile responses by SLI-NH2 were the same
(P > 0.05; two-way ANOVA). In contrast with the
results obtained with the femoral arterial preparation, the relaxation
responses of renal arteries from C57BL/6J mice were not reduced by
precontraction of these arteries with 30 mM KCl compared with
precontraction with cirazoline (Fig. 3;
p > 0.05; Student's unpaired t test). EMax values for
SLI-NH2-induced relaxation of renal arteries
were: cirazoline-treated (n = 3), 31 ± 9% compared
with 30 mM KCl-treated (n = 3), 49 ± 12%.
EMax values for tc-LI-induced
relaxation were: cirazoline-treated (n = 4), 30 ± 7%
compared with 30 mM KCl-treated (n = 3), 43 ± 2%.
|
|
Non-NOS/Non-sGC/Non-COX-Mediated Relaxation of Murine
Mesenterics by tc-LI.
We have reported that
SLIGRL-NH2 caused the vasodilation of small
murine second-order mesenteric arteries via a non-NOS/non-sGC/non-COX mechanism (McGuire et al., 2002
), and thus, we determined whether tc-LI
had a similar action. Indeed, tc-LI caused a vasodilation that was
partly L-NAME/ODQ/indomethacin-insensitive (Fig.
4) and was completely inhibited by
additional pretreatment of these tissues with 1 µM apamin plus 0.1 µM charybdotoxin (Fig. 4). The EMax values were all significantly different than each other (n =
3; p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls
post hoc). There was no significant difference between the
pD2 values determined for control and
L-NAME/ODQ/indomethacin-treated tissues. The
pD2 values and
EMax values for
tc-LIGRLO-NH2-induced relaxation were: control
(n = 4), 6.0 ± 0.1 and 90 ± 5% and
L-NAME/ODQ/indomethacin-treated (n =
3), 5.9 ± 0.3 and 52 ± 15%. These
pD2 values were virtually identical to
the pD2 values for
SLI-NH2-induced relaxation of MA reported
previously (McGuire et al., 2002
). The
EMax value for tissues treated with
L-NAME + ODQ + indomethacin + apamin + charybdotoxin (n = 3) was 6 ± 4%, and the
pD2 value could not be determined.
tc-LI (0.1 to 3 µM) failed to cause the relaxation of 0.1 µM
cirazoline precontracted small mesenteric arteries from PAR2 (
/
)
mice, but at concentrations >10 µM, tc-LI further contracted these
vessels (data not shown).
|
SLI-NH2 Induces PAR2-Mediated Endothelium-Independent
Contraction of Murine Arteries and tc-LI Induces Non-PAR2
Endothelium-Independent Arterial Contraction.
To assess the
contribution of the vascular smooth muscle expression of PAR2 to renal
arterial contraction by SLI-NH2 and tc-LI, renal
arteries from C57BL/6J and PAR2 (
/
) mice were treated with these
agonists. Consistent with a previous report (Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
),
SLI-NH2 elicited a contraction response from renal arteries of PAR2 (+/+) mice when these arteries were coincubated with an inhibitor of NOS (300 µM L-NAME) (Fig.
5) but did not contract the nontreated
(control) renal arteries. The other PAR2 ligand agonist, tc-LI,
contracted renal arteries whether NOS inhibitor was present or not
(Fig. 5). tc-LI, however, also caused the contraction of renal arteries
from PAR2 (
/
) mice, whereas SLI-NH2 did not, even in the presence of NOS inhibitor (Fig. 5). Renal arteries from
PAR2 (
/
) that were precontracted with cirazoline neither relaxed
nor produced further contraction when exposed to concentrations
100
µM of SLI-NH2, but contracted further to tc-LI
(
3 µM) (data not shown). KCl (120 mM) elicited equivalent
contractile responses from renal arteries from each of the mouse
strains, 4 to 5 mN/1-mm length of tissue.
|
/
),
and PAR2 (
/
) mice. L-NAME-pretreated endothelium-intact
arteries and untreated endothelium-denuded femoral arteries from
C57BL/6J mice contracted when treated with
SLI-NH2, as did the untreated femoral arteries
from NOS3 (
/
) mice (Fig. 6). The
contractile response to SLI-NH2 exhibited a very
rapid tachyphylaxis such that tissues failed to contract when exposed
to consecutive repetitive doses of SLI-NH2 either
following washout periods or after determination of cumulative
concentration-response relationships with precontracted tissues (i.e.,
same protocols represented in Figs. 1-3; data not shown). In contrast,
tc-LI contracted femoral arteries under baseline tension conditions
from all three strains of mice (Fig. 6), as it had the renal arteries,
and this contraction also was unaffected by the prior removal of the
endothelium (Fig. 6), pretreatment with tetrodotoxin (1 µM), or
repetitive exposures to tcLI (up to five times) (data not shown). KCl
(120 mM) elicited equivalent contractile responses from femoral
arteries of each of the strains of mice, 6 to 7 mN/1.5-mm length of
tissue.
|
Intracellular Caffeine-Sensitive Calcium Stores are Necessary for
tc-LI-Induced Vascular Contractions.
To determine whether an
influx of extracellular calcium contributed to the contractile response
of femoral arteries by tc-LI, tissues were preincubated in the presence
of inhibitors of either voltage-gated calcium channels (nifedipine) or
nonspecific cation channels (CdCl2) or were
incubated in calcium-free Kreb's solution. Significantly, all three of
these treatments failed to inhibit contractions by 50 µM tc-LI (Fig.
7, a and b; results not shown for
CdCl2; n = 3; p > 0.05; ANOVA). To characterize the intracellular stores of calcium that
elicited the contractions of femoral arteries by tc-LI, tissues were
pretreated with cyclopiazonic acid (10 µM), to inhibit active uptake
of calcium by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and then exposed to caffeine
(10 mM), to deplete caffeine-sensitive stores, before exposure to 50 µM tc-LI. Indeed, the depletion of intracellular caffeine-sensitive
calcium stores reduced significantly the contractions caused
subsequently by the addition of 50 µM tc-LI (Fig. 7c).
|
Contraction of Femoral Arteries by tc-LI Does Not Involve
Activation of PAR4, Vascular Muscarinic (M2), Endothelin-1
(ETA), Histamine (H1/2), Angiotensin II
(AT1),
1-Adrenergic, Substance P
(NK1/NK2), or Thromboxane A2 (TP)
Receptors Nor the activation of COX.
A series of known receptor
inhibitors were used to test the hypothesis that if any of a number of
vascular agonists, including M2,
ETA, H1,
AT1,
1,
NK1/NK2, or TP receptors,
were involved in tc-LI-induced contraction, then receptor antagonists
to these vasoactive compounds should block tc-LI-induced contraction.
However, pretreatment of femoral arteries with the following receptor
antagonists failed to inhibit 50 µM tc-LI-induced contraction of
femoral arteries: atropine (5 µM), BQ123 (1 µM), chlorpheniramine
(10 µM), Losartan (1 µM), prazosin (1.5 µM), SR140333 (100 nM)
plus SR48986 (100 nM), or SQ29548 (10 µM); the nonselective COX
inhibitor indomethacin (10 µM) also failed to block contraction (data
not shown). In addition, the PAR4-selective agonist
AYPGKF-NH2 that activated PAR4-mediated rat,
mouse, and human platelet aggregation (Faruqi et al., 2000
; Hollenberg
and Saifeddine, 2001
; Chung et al., 2002
) failed to cause a contractile
response of the femoral artery (data not shown).
Reverse-Sequenced Control PAR2-Derived Activating Peptides Fail to
Affect Vascular Tone.
To determine whether the vascular actions of
SLI-NH2 and tc-LI resulted from nonspecific
effects, we chose to determine the effects of the reverse-sequenced
peptides and trans-cinnamoic acid. In all tissues from each
strain of mouse, neither LRGILS-NH2 nor
trans-cinnamoyl-OLRGIL-NH2 (
100 µM
of each) failed to change the tone of either precontracted arteries or
arteries at baseline tension whether or not NOS inhibitor was present
(data not shown). Furthermore, 100 µM of trans-cinnamoic
acid did not affect tone (data not shown).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major finding of our study is that we have identified a
non-PAR2-mediated vasoconstrictor activity elicited by the PAR2-AP tc-LIGRLO-NH2. By the use of several different
murine blood vessels and the use of mice with selective gene deletions
for PAR2 and NOS3, we also demonstrated vessel-selective PAR2-dependent
relaxant effects caused by both SLI-NH2 and tc-LI
and confirmed the contractile effects for murine PAR2 activation in
vitro. However, tc-LI-mediated vasoconstriction was common to all of
the murine arteries studied here. The clearest distinction between PAR2
and the distinct PAR-AP receptor responsible for the action of tc-LI is
illustrated in Fig. 6, wherein the femoral arteries from PAR2 (
/
)
mice contracted in response to tc-LI but not to
SLI-NH2. A series of receptor antagonists to
known vasoconstrictor substances failed to inhibit tc-LI-induced
contraction of murine femoral arteries. Taken together with the failure
of the removal of the endothelium to inhibit contractile activity, the
data suggest the existence of a receptor with a novel pharmacology that
is expressed on murine vascular smooth muscle. In addition, these data
indicate that tc-LI may not be a selective ligand for PAR2. Furthermore
the data indicate that caffeine-sensitive intracellular calcium stores
and not extracellular influx are essential for mediating the
contractile effect linked to activation of this novel tc-LI-activated receptor.
The vascular relaxant effects of the PAR2-derived tethered
ligand-activating peptide sequences SLI-NH2 and
tc-LI were found to be dependent upon the activation of PAR2 in renal
arteries, femoral arteries, and MA. Both SLI-NH2
and tc-LI, which induced relaxation of murine femoral arteries with
identical potencies, were inhibited by pretreatment with a combination
of L-NAME + ODQ (Fig. 1) or by precontraction with 30 mM
KCl (Fig. 2). KCl (30 mM) abolished the relaxation of femoral arteries
by tc-LI at low concentrations, whereas the relaxation by
SLI-NH2 was inhibited partially; yet, both
peptide agonists used the same signal transduction pathway for
relaxation. Thus, it appears that the vasoconstrictor activity of tc-LI
was greater than the vasodilator activity in these precontracted
tissues. In femoral arteries from NOS3 (
/
) mice, PAR2-APs failed to
initiate vascular smooth muscle relaxation. These results are
consistent with the observations reported previously for the relaxation
response of precontracted renal arteries from mice that also
demonstrated the prerequisite role of NOS in PAR2-mediated vasodilation
in vitro (Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
). For comparison, we also demonstrate
that tc-LI and SLI-NH2 had equivalent actions in
the C57BL/6J mouse renal artery (Fig. 3). The coincidence of these
concentration-relaxation curves for the peptides indicates that
endogenous peptidases do not appear to account for the differences seen
in the contractile responses by these peptides. Additional pretreatment
of femoral arteries with ET-1 (ETA and
ETB) receptor antagonists failed to have any
additional effects, and this result differed from an earlier study that
reported an endothelin-1 associated contractile effect in the femoral
artery from rats (Magazine et al., 1996
).
As previously reported for SLI-NH2- and
trypsin-induced PAR2-mediated effects in MA (McGuire et al., 2002
),
tc-LI caused an L-NAME/ODQ/COX-insensitive relaxation. As
well, the relaxation of MA elicited by tc-LI was completely inhibited
by pretreatment with a combination of apamin + charybdotoxin. This
result is an indication of the involvement of small-, intermediate-,
and large (big)-conductance Ca2+-activated
K+ channels (SKCa,
IKCa, and BKCa,
respectively), most likely via an endothelium-dependent
hyperpolarization, in PAR2-induced vasodilation of resistance arteries.
We were not surprised to find that a NOS/sGC mechanism mediated
PAR2-dependent relaxation of murine femoral arteries, whereas a
non-NOS/non-sGC/non-COX mechanism mediated the relaxation of MA. The
importance of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization to vascular
smooth muscle relaxation has been highlighted for resistance rather
than conduit arteries, and thus, our data agree with this argument
(McGuire et al., 2001
).
It has been reported by ourselves and others that high concentrations
(>30 µM) of PAR2-APs induce further contraction of precontracted murine arteries (Moffatt and Cocks, 1998
; McGuire et al., 2002
). These
effects appear to be both peptide- and tissue-specific responses. In
renal arteries, the further contraction by
SLI-NH2, but not by tc-LI, is dependent upon PAR2
expression, and these results confirmed a previous study (Moffatt and
Cocks, 1998
). In femoral arteries, however, it is clearly a non-PAR2
mechanism that mediates the added SLI-NH2-induced
contractions because this response is present in PAR2 (
/
) mice.
Interestingly, in the PAR2 (
/
) preparations, the renal arteries
responded in a similar way to the MA, wherein high concentrations of
SLI-NH2 failed to contract MA from PAR2 (
/
)
mice further (McGuire et al., 2002
). In support of a study by Moffatt
and Cocks (1998)
, we also found that SLIGRL-NH2
induced an endothelium-independent, PAR2-dependent contraction of
arteries from baseline tension when NOS activity was either inhibited
or absent [NOS3 (
/
) animals]. This PAR2-dependent contractile
response to SLI-NH2 exhibited rapid
tachyphylaxis, unlike the PAR2-dependent relaxation responses, and
thus, we suggest differential regulation mechanisms for endothelial
versus vascular smooth muscle PAR2.
Our results are significantly different from those of previous studies
that propose non-PAR2 effects for SLI-NH2 and/or
tc-LI. In the study by Vergnolle et al. (1998)
, the non-PAR2 effects on
intestinal chloride transport were inhibited by indomethacin, but the
contractile response to tc-LI in the femoral artery was not
indomethacin-sensitive. In the rat and human vascular tissue bioassays,
contraction elicited by non-PAR2 actions of
SLI-NH2 was endothelium-dependent (Roy et al.,
1998
; Saifeddine et al., 1998
), whereas in our study both PAR2 and
non-PAR2 contractile effects were endothelium-independent. The question
of whether the non-PAR2 contractile mechanism of the PAR2-APs in
precontracted femoral arteries is the same as the non-PAR2 mechanism of
contraction by tc-LI at baseline tension is unanswered. We did not
identify a specific receptor inhibitor of the tc-LI-induced contractile effect in femoral arteries; nor was the contractile response due to the
activation of PAR4. Thus, these results point to the existence of a
receptor for tc-LI with a novel pharmacology. These data indicate that
several likely candidate mechanisms such as cyclooxygenase products,
NK1 and NK2,
M1 and M2,
1, H1,
ETA, AT1, TP, and PAR4 receptors are not involved. The identification of any inhibitor of this
activity would allow us to determine whether the actions at baseline
tension and precontraction are the same.
In conclusion, we determined that the vasodilator action of tc-LI in a
series of different murine blood vessels was due to PAR2 activation and
that PAR2 activation of vascular smooth muscle in murine arteries can
also produce contraction. Furthermore, we conclude that tc-LI, in
addition to activation of PAR2, is also an agonist for an as yet
unidentified receptor that can mediate the vasoconstriction of murine
arteries in vitro. Future studies to determine more precisely the
signal transduction mechanism of the contraction of murine vascular
smooth muscle from femoral arteries, likely to be facilitated by the
use of PAR2 (
/
) mice, should provide a basis for the subsequent
isolation and identification of the receptor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 9, 2002.
Received for publication June 13, 2002.
1 Current address: R.W. Johnson Research Pharmaceutical Institute, Spring House, PA 19477-0776.
These studies were supported by an AstraZeneca/Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Postdoctoral Fellowship (to J.J.M.), an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) Summer Studentship (to J.D.), by an equipment grant from AHFMR (to M.D.H. and C.R.T.), and by research operating funds from the Alberta Heart and Stroke Foundation (M.D.H. and C.R.T.), the CIHR (M.D.H. and C.R.T.), a Johnson and Johnson focused-giving program grant (to M.D.H.) and the Kidney Foundation of Canada (M.D.H.).
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.040352
Address correspondence to: Dr. John J. McGuire, Smooth Muscle Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1. E-mail: mcguire{at}ucalgary.ca
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PAR, proteinase-activated receptors;
tc-LI, trans-cinnamoyl-LIGRLO-amide;
PAR2-AP, PAR2-activating
peptides;
NOS, nitric-oxide synthase;
sGC, soluble guanylyl cyclase;
COX, cyclooxygenase;
SLI-NH2, SLIGRL-NH2,
Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-amide;
BQ123, cyclo(L-Leu-D-Trp-D-Asp-L-Pro-D-Val);
BQ788, N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-
-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine;
ODQ, 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one;
L-NAME, L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester
hydrochloride;
SQ29548, [1S-[1
,2
(Z),
3
,4
]]-7-[3[[2-[(phenylamino)carbonyl[hydrazino]methyl]-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl]-5-heptenoic
acid;
SR140333, nolpitantium;
SR48968, (S)-N-methyl-N[4-acetylamino-4-phenylpiperidino)-2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)butyl]benzamide;
MA, second-order small mesenteric artery;
ACh, acetylcholine;
U46619, 9,11-dideoxy-9
,11
-methanoepoxy-prosta-5Z,13E-dien-1-oic
acid;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
ET, endothelin-1;
M2, muscarinic receptor;
ETA, endothelin-1 receptor;
H1/2, histamine receptor;
AT1, angiotensin II
receptor;
NK1/NK2, neurokinin receptors;
TP, thromboxane A2 receptor.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Saifeddine, M. L. Seymour, Y.-P. Xiao, S. J. Compton, S. Houle, R. Ramachandran, W. K. MacNaughton, S. Simonet, C. Vayssettes-Courchay, T. J. Verbeuren, et al. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 activating peptides: distinct canine coronary artery receptor systems Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3279 - H3289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.C. G. Lee, D. A. Knight, K. B. Lane, D. S. Cheng, M. A. Koay, L. R. Teixeira, J. C. Nesbitt, R. C. Chambers, P. J. Thompson, and R. W. Light Activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2 in mesothelial cells induces pleural inflammation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): L734 - L740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. McGuire, M. Saifeddine, C. R. Triggle, K. Sun, and M. D. Hollenberg 2-Furoyl-LIGRLO-amide: A Potent and Selective Proteinase-Activated Receptor 2 Agonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2004; 309(3): 1124 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Napoli, F de Nigris, J L Wallace, M D Hollenberg, G Tajana, G De Rosa, V Sica, and G Cirino Evidence that protease activated receptor 2 expression is enhanced in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 57(5): 513 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||