Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas
for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (J.R.S.); and Tulane
University, New Orleans, Louisiana (M.D.H.)
9,10-Epoxy-12-octadecenoic acid (EOA), a metabolite of linoleic acid,
causes cardiac arrest in dogs. Other metabolites of linoleic acid also
have toxic effects. This study investigates the mechanism of action of
four of these compounds on cardiac Na+ current
(INa). The whole-cell patch-clamp technique
was used to investigate the effects of EOA,
9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic acid (DHOA), and their corresponding
methyl esters (9,10-epoxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester, EOM; and
9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester, DHOM) on
INa in isolated adult rat ventricular
myocytes. Extracellular application of each compound elicited a
concentration-dependent inhibition of INa.
The dose-response curve yielded 50% inhibition concentrations of
301 ± 117 µM for DHOA, 41 ± 6 µM for DHOM, 34 ± 5 µM for EOA, and 160 ± 41 µM for EOM. Although there was no effect on activation, 50 µM DHOM, EOA, and EOM significantly
hyperpolarized the steady-state inactivation curve by approximately
6
mV. Furthermore, EOM significantly increased the slope of the
steady-state inactivation curve. These compounds also seemed to
stabilize the inactivated state because the time for recovery from
inactivation was significantly slowed from a control value of 12.9 ± 0.5 ms to 30.5 ± 3.3, 31.4 ± 1.4, and 20.5 ± 1.0 ms by 50 µM DHOM, EOA, and EOM, respectively. These compounds have
multiple actions on Na+ channels and that despite their
structural similarities their actions differ from each other. The
steady-state block of INa suggests that
either the pore is being blocked or the channels are prevented from
gating to the open state. In addition, these compounds stabilize the
inactivated state and promote increased population of a slower
inactivated state.
 |
Introduction |
The
role of fatty acids in signaling processes is becoming increasingly
important. Various fatty acids have been shown to alter several ion
currents, including Na+ (Xiao et al., 1995
; Kang
and Leaf, 1996
), Ca2+ (Huang et al., 1992
;
Hashimoto et al., 1999
), K+ (Bogdanov et al.,
1998
; Crumb et al., 1999
), and Cl
(Ordway et
al., 1991
). Arachidonic acid (C20:4) has been widely studied for the
actions of the parent compound as well as the extensive metabolic
pathways, including the prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Although less
widely studied, linoleic acid (C18:2) is a major component of cell
membrane phospholipids and is subject to some of the same metabolic
pathways. A linoleic acid metabolite (LAM) of interest is
9,10-epoxy-12-octadecenoic acid (EOA), also known as leukotoxin. EOA is
formed by lipid autoxidation in the lungs (Sevanian et al., 1979
) and
by spontaneous reaction of oxygen radicals with linoleic acid in
neutrophil membranes (Hayakawa et al., 1996
) (Fig.
1). Although undetectable in normal
patients (Hayakawa et al., 1990
), EOA has been associated with acute
respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients where it can reach
plasma concentrations up to 300 µM (mean peak plasma concentration of
99 ± 25 µM) (Kosaka et al., 1994
). EOA has also been shown to
cause cardiac arrest in dogs (Fukushima et al., 1988
) and relax
pulmonary artery smooth muscle (Takahashi et al., 1992
). In pig
experimentally induced cardiac ischemia caused EOA to increase from
undetectable levels to on the order of 1 µg/g tissue (Dudda et al.,
1996
).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Metabolism of linoleic acid. The structures of the
tested compounds and a pathway by which they may be produced
endogenously are illustrated.
|
|
Recent studies have questioned whether EOA is the toxic agent involved,
because it may be further metabolized by epoxide hydrolases to form
9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic acid (DHOA) (Moghaddam et al., 1997
).
Both EOA and DHOA have been reported to be toxic in humans and various
animal preparations (Fukushima et al., 1988
; Kosaka et al., 1994
).
During myocardial ischemia in pig hydroxy-metabolites of linoleic acid
were found to increase from 1 to 3 µg/g tissue up to 4 to 22 µg/g
tissue, depending on the metabolite formed (Dudda et al., 1996
).
Studies have suggested that EOA must be metabolized to DHOA before
producing toxic effects (Moghaddam et al., 1997
; Greene et al., 2000
).
In accordance with this evidence, in isolated rat cardiac myocytes
9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester (DHOM) (a methyl ester of
DHOA) has been shown to block both Na+ current
(INa) and transient outward
K+ current (Ito),
whereas 9,10-epoxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester (EOM) (a methyl ester
of EOA) had no significant effect (Stimers et al., 1999
).
This study further investigated the effects of EOA, DHOA, and their
corresponding methyl esters (EOM and DHOM) on sodium current in adult
rat ventricular myocytes. This study was designed to investigate the
role of each of these four LAM in blocking Na+
channels and identify the possible mechanism of action. A kinetic analysis of the actions of each compound on
INa in adult rat cardiac myocytes
using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques was performed. Although it has
been suggested that these compounds, being lipid soluble, may have
actions on cell membranes that indirectly alter INa, we show herein for the first time
that each compound has direct actions on Na+
channels that suggest selective interaction with the channels. A
preliminary report of this work was published previously (Harrell and
Stimers, 2002
).
 |
Materials and Methods |
Chemicals.
EOA, EOM, DHOA, and DHOM were all synthesized and
purified from linoleic acid as described previously (Moran et al.,
2000
). Ethanol stock solutions were prepared before use and stored at
40°C. Unless otherwise noted, all other chemicals were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Fair
Lawn, NJ).
Solutions.
The techniques used to isolate and measure
INa were similar to those described
previously (Stimers et al., 1999
). All intracellular (pipette)
solutions contained 120 mM DL-aspartic acid, 120 mM CsOH, 10 mM CsCl, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM
MgCl2, 11 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2. A
control extracellular solution containing 145 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 5.1 mM HEPES, 4.9 mM Na HEPES, 5.55 mM dextrose, 2 mM BaCl2, 0.2 mM
CdCl2, 5 mM KCl, and 11.69 mM sucrose, pH 7.4, was used to achieve a giga-ohm seal and whole-cell configuration. Once
whole-cell configuration of the patch clamp was achieved, the external
solution was changed to 30 Na+ that contained 30 mM NaCl, 115 mM N-methyl-d-glucamine, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM CdCl2, 2 mM
BaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 5.55 mM dextrose, and 11.69 mM sucrose, pH 7.4. These solutions block all major ion currents other
than INa and reduce the magnitude of
INa so that good voltage control could
be maintained in each cell. Linoleic acid metabolites tested were
dissolved in ethanol and added to the 30 Na+
extracellular solutions. Ethanol concentration did not exceed 0.5%,
which had no effect on INa.
Cell Isolation and Culture.
Cardiac myocytes from adult male
Sprague-Dawley rats were isolated by Langendorff perfusion of 0.05%
collagenase (type II; Worthington Biochemicals, Freehold, NJ), as
described previously (Dobretsov et al., 1998
). Myocytes were then
plated in a KB buffer that contained the following: 85 mM KCl, 5 mM
HEPES, 5 mM Tris, 25 mM
KH2PO4, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5 mM
MgSO4, 5 mM K-pyruvate, 5 mM
Na2-creatine phosphate, 20 mM taurine, 0.1 mM
CaCl2, and 20 mM dextrose, pH 7.4. After allowing
cells to attach to the culture dishes, KB buffer was replaced with
culture media of M199 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 4% fetal
bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were then incubated
at 37°C under 95% air, 5% CO2 for 1 to 4 days
until use. As shown in Fig. 2 there was
no significant change in the magnitude or voltage dependence of peak
INa over this time in culture.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of time in culture on voltage dependence of
peak INa. The data were collected as
described in Fig. 3. Peak INa measured for
voltage pulses from a holding potential of 100 mV to potentials
between 80 and +60 mV in 10-mV increments. Data were collected from
two cultures that were examined on all 4 days. There are no differences
between peak currents on any day (n = 7, 7, 10, and
11 on days 1-4, respectively).
|
|
Patch Clamp.
Individual rat myocytes were patch clamped in
the whole-cell configuration with an integrating patch clamp (3900A;
Dagan, Minneapolis, MN) using standard techniques (Dobretsov and
Stimers, 1996
; Stimers and Dobretsov, 1998
; Dobretsov et al., 1998
).
Culture dishes were placed on the stage of an inverted microscope
(Diaphot; Nikon, Melville, NY) and perfused with solutions at a rate of 5 ml/min. Patch pipettes were produced from borosilicate glass using a
Flaming-Brown P77 puller (Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA). The
pipettes were then fire polished to produce pipettes with a final
resistance of 1 to 3 M
. After forming a seal, the holding potential
was set at
100 mV. Upon formation of a giga-ohm seal, the electrode
capacitance was compensated. A brief electrical pulse was used to
achieve the whole-cell configuration. Cell capacitance, input
resistance, and series resistance were measured in every cell by
applying a 10-mV pulse. Cell capacitance and series resistance compensation were used before a voltage-clamp protocol to improve the
quality of the voltage clamp. Pulses were generated and collected using
pClamp software and a Digidata 1200 computer acquisition system (Axon
Instruments, Union City, CA). In all pulse protocols used in this
study, a P/4 protocol was used to subtract capacity transients and
leak. All experiments were performed at room temperature (20-22°C).
Data Analysis.
Data were collected from only one cell in
each culture dish to ensure there was no residual contamination from
previous drug applications. Each cell is considered as an independent
measure (n) because control data were recorded from each
cell before drug application, so each cell serves as its own control.
To ensure we were not investigating a unique animal, all experiments
were repeated on cells from at least two isolations. It is our
experience for inbred animals that have not been treated in any way
that the variability between cells from a single heart is greater than the variability between animals. For example, in four animals used in
this study, the standard deviation for measurements of peak
INa at
30 mV in each animal were
9.8, 10.9, 10.7, and 25.6 pA/pF (n = 25, 9, 8, and 6, respectively); however, the standard deviation of all four animals was
only 8.8 pA/pF (n = 4). This leads us to conclude that
it is appropriate for these studies to consider each cell as an
independent measurement.
Data were initially analyzed using Clampfit (Axon Instruments);
Boltzmann, Hill, and exponential fits were performed using the
nonlinear fitting routines in Origin (MicroCal Software, Northampton, MA); and statistical analyses used Student's t test or
analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc analysis as
appropriate using SigmaStat (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).
Significant differences were defined as P < 0.05. All
averaged values were expressed as mean ± S.E.
 |
Results |
Activation.
To examine the effect of LAMs on
INa activation,
INa was measured using whole-cell
patch-clamp techniques. Membrane potential was held at
100 mV and
pulsed to potentials between
80 and 60 mV in 10-mV increments for 25 ms (Fig. 3). Typical records of Na+ currents from single cells are shown after
exposure to control solution and 50 µM DHOA or DHOM (Fig. 3). In this
cell, DHOA had no effect on INa,
whereas DHOM blocked about 50% of the inward current. Other
experiments applied 50 µM EOA or EOM (data not shown). Chemicals were
applied for 3 to 5 min before data were collected. Control currents
displayed typical activation and inactivation kinetics and voltage
dependence for INa. Peak current
measurements were made in each cell, normalized for cell capacitance,
averaged between cells with like treatments, and plotted in Fig.
4. Figure 4A shows that on average in
these experiments DHOA had no significant effect on
INa at any of the tested potentials;
however, 50 µM DHOM significantly inhibited
INa at potentials between
40 and +30
mV (P < 0.05). In contrast, both 50 µM EOA and EOM
significantly inhibited INa between
30 and +30 mV (P < 0.05; data not shown for
clarity). Figure 4B shows the percentage of inhibition caused by each
compound with respect to control measured at
30 mV, the peak of the
current-voltage relation. DHOM showed the greatest inhibition of all
tested compounds. When DHOM was included in the patch pipette solution,
there was no inhibition of INa (data not shown). There was no apparent shift in the voltage dependence for
INa activation. Such a shift would
indicate that LAMs affected the potentials necessary to activate the
sodium channels in rat ventricular myocytes. However, no such shift
occurred; therefore, LAMs have no effect on steady-state activation.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Voltage dependence of INa.
Top, protocol used to measure INa in cardiac
myocytes. Membrane potential was held at 100 mV and pulsed to
potentials between 80 and +60 mV in 10-mV increments, for 20 ms.
Bottom (three panels), resulting current recordings from a single
myocyte under control conditions and subsequently exposed to 50 µM
DHOA and 50 µM DHOM. For clarity pulses are shown in steps of 20 mV;
however, data were collected every 10 mV. Cell capacitance was 94 pF.
Time scale indicates from the start of data acquisition.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Voltage dependence of INa
and effect of linoleic acid metabolites. Peak inward current measured
at each potential from data in Fig. 3 and other cells were averaged and
plotted versus membrane potential. A, cells that were exposed to 50 µM DHOA and 50 µM DHOM. Symbols represent mean ± S.E. Data
points are connected by straight lines. B, effect of each chemical on
peak INa measured at 30 mV, the peak of
the current-voltage relation. Number of cells used was six to seven for
each chemical. DHOM, EOA, and EOM significantly inhibited peak
INa between 30 and +30 mV. DHOA has no
significant effect on INa in these cells.
|
|
Steady-State Inactivation.
Steady-state inactivation was
measured to examine the effect of EOA, EOM, DHOA, and DHOM. Myocytes
were voltage clamped at
100 mV and a two-pulse protocol was applied
in control and in the presence of 50 µM of each compound (Fig.
5). Similar to the activation protocol
used above, a prepulse was applied from the holding potential to
potentials between
80 and
10 mV in 5-mV increments for 20 ms to
induce Na+ channel inactivation. After a 2.5-ms
repolarization to
100 mV, a second depolarizing pulse to
10 mV was
applied for 10 ms to measure the amount of
INa that was available for activation.
This protocol is designed to measure the number of
Na+ channels not inactivated by the prepulse.
Results from a typical experiment are shown in Fig. 5 where the
protocol was applied in control conditions and after exposure to 50 µM EOA. In this experiment about 40% of
INa was blocked by EOA; however,
inactivation can still be easily measured by this protocol. The peaks
of the INa elicited by the second
pulse were measured, fit to a Boltzmann equation, and the minimum and
maximum fit parameters were used to normalize the data that were
plotted versus the prepulse potential (Fig.
6). The curves in Fig. 6 represent the
best fit of a Boltzmann equation to each data set. Fifty micromolar
DHOM, EOA, and EOM all significantly hyperpolarized the steady-state
inactivation curve. EOM also significantly increased the slope of the
steady-state inactivation curve (Fig. 6B). Parameter values are given
in Table 1.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Steady-state fast inactivation of
INa. Top, double pulse protocol used to
measure the voltage dependence of inactivation. Membrane potential was
held at 100 mV and pulsed to potentials between 80 and 60 mV in
5-mV increments for 20 ms. After a 2-ms return to 100 ms a test pulse
to 10 mV was applied for 10 ms. Bottom, current records from a single
cell in control conditions and exposed to 50 µM EOA. During the
prepulse INa activates and inactivates in a
voltage-dependent manner. The subsequent test pulse elicits
INa that is still available for activation.
Peak inward current during the test pulse is measured and normalized to
the maximum current. Cell capacitance was 94 pF.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Voltage dependence of inactivation. A, mean ± S.E. values obtained from experiments like that shown in Fig. 5. Data
are normalized to the maximum current obtained in each condition. This
shows that DHOM, EOA, and EOM all cause a significant shift of the
steady-state inactivation curve to hyperpolarized potentials by about
6 mV. The data points for DHOM, EOA, and EOM significantly differ
from control values between 60 and 40 mV (P < 0.05). B, isolates the same data for control and EOM to more clearly
show the significant increase in slope caused by EOM. Lines are
best-fit Boltzmann relations to each data set. Fit parameters and
number of cells are given in Table 1.
|
|
Recovery from Steady-State Inactivation.
Fig.
7 shows the protocol used and typical
results obtained from a single myocyte to measure the rate of recovery
from inactivation. A two-pulse protocol was used with both pulses being
identical steps from the holding potential of
100 to 0 mV for 10 ms.
The interpulse interval was varied from 2 to 142 ms in 10-ms increments to determine the rate at which the Na+ channels
recover from inactivation induced by the first pulse. In the figure,
the first trial of the protocol is bolded. In subsequent trials, the
first pulse is repeated followed by the second pulse with a greater
delay. Peak currents measured during the test (second) pulse were
normalized by dividing by the peak current during the prepulse. The
figure shows that under control conditions the test pulse currents
returned to control levels rapidly. DHOM reduced the size of the
currents but recovery from inactivation was clearly seen in this cell.
Results for all cells were averaged for each treatment and plotted
versus interpulse interval in Fig. 8.
Although control records (half-filled squares) showed a rapid recovery of current, recovery was only 91% complete in these experiments, suggesting that some slower inactivation process is not fully measured
in this time scale. The time between trials in these experiments was
set to 10 s to allow full recovery between each trial. Data were
plotted versus interpulse interval and fit to a single exponential
function. Parameters are given in Table
2. Although results similar to control
were obtained in cells treated with 50 µM DHOA, those cells treated
with DHOM, EOA, and EOM all showed a significant slowing in the rate of
recovery. EOM, although significantly different from control, was also
significantly different from both DHOM and EOA. In addition,
significant differences in the extent of recovery were found between
control and DHOM-, EOA-, and EOM-treated cells. This suggests that
these compounds are also affecting this slower inactivation process.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Recovery from inactivation. Top, protocol used to
measure the rate of recovery of INa from
fast inactivation. From a holding potential of 100 mV a 10-ms
prepulse to 0 mV was followed 2 to 140 ms later by an identical test
pulse. Bottom, current records from a single cell under control
conditions and after exposure to 50 µM DHOM. Peak currents were
measured during each test pulse and normalized to the current magnitude
during the prepulse. Cell capacitance was 136 pF.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of linoleic acid metabolites on recovery from
inactivation. Data from experiments like that shown in Fig. 7 were
collected from multiple cells (n given in Table 2).
Symbols represent mean ± S.E. for each treatment. Cells exposed
to 50 µM DHOM and EOA show a recovery time that was significantly
slower than control, and 50 µM EOM was significantly slower than
control but significantly faster than DHOM and EOA. Data points for
DHOM, EOA, and EOM are significantly different from control values for
recovery times greater than 10 ms (P < 0.05).
Lines represent best fit of a single exponential function to each data
set. Fit parameters are given in Table 2.
|
|
Dose-Response Relationship.
The dose dependence of the
INa inhibition displayed by LAMs was
determined by applying a single repeating pulse from the holding potential of
100 to
10 mV for 10 ms to a whole-cell patch-clamped myocyte. After the INa reached
equilibrium, the solution was changed to a higher concentration of drug
and allowed to reach a new equilibrium. This process was completed for
concentrations of 0.1, 1, 3, 10, 20, and 50 µM LAMs. Higher
concentrations were not used because the myocytes either became leaky
or contracted into balls in such conditions. This may be reflective of
our previous observation that these compounds have multiple effects
(Stimers et al., 1999
; Moran et al., 2001
; Ha et al., 2002
). The peak
INa from each pulse was plotted
against time (data not shown). This plot was used to identify the
average peak INa of the various
concentrations. These peak INa values
were divided by the control peak INa
of each cell and expressed as percentage of control in Fig.
9. The curves represent the best fit of
the Hill equation to each data set assuming that at high enough
concentrations all of INa would be
blocked and a Hill slope of 1. The half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) values obtained from these fits are given
in Fig. 9. As can be seen, DHOM and EOA showed lower
IC50 values than did DHOA or EOM. It should be
noted that if different assumptions are made to generate the fit curve
(e.g., less than 100% inhibition) then different parameter values
would be obtained. Due to the uncertainty of these fit parameters, no
statistical inferences are being made herein.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Dose-response curves for DHOA, DHOM, EOA, and EOM. To
determine the dose dependence of INa
inhibition caused by these four compounds, a single repeating voltage
pulse (from 100 to 10 mV for 20 ms at 0.1 Hz) was applied to a
whole-cell patch-clamped myocyte. After INa
reached equilibrium in control solution, each compound was applied in
sequentially increasing concentrations (without washout) from 0.1 to 50 µM. The average peak INa for each
concentration was then normalized to the average control peak
INa measured in the same cell, yielding the
percentage of inhibition. The curves shown are the best fit of a Hill
equation to each data set. Because it was not possible to use higher
concentrations of these compounds because of cell death, two
assumptions were made in fitting these data. First, it was assumed that
all four compounds could completely inhibit
INa. Second, it was assumed the Hill
coefficient was equal to 1. IC50 values are given in the
Figure. Six to seven cells were used in each dose-response curve.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
Linoleic acid metabolites have been shown to be very toxic in a
variety of cell types, in several species of animals, and most
importantly in humans. Effects include cell death, cardiac arrhythmias,
multiple organ failure, and cardiac arrest. In a clinical study, it was
found that severely burned patients' mean peak plasma concentrations
of EOA were 99 ± 25 µM and that the level was correlated with
mortality (Kosaka et al., 1994
). This study was undertaken to identify
the mechanism by which these compounds affect electrical activity in
the heart. Previously, we have shown that DHOM prolongs the cardiac
action potential and slows its rate of rise (Stimers et al., 1999
).
This suggested that Na+ channels were involved.
In this study, we have investigated in detail the effects of four
structurally similar linoleic acid metabolites on
INa. Significant new findings in this
study have shown in adult rat ventricular myocytes a pronounced
dose-dependent reduction in Na+ current density
caused by DHOM and EOA especially. Current inhibition was not due to
shifts in activation kinetics; however, a significant shift in
steady-state inactivation was measured. Interestingly, of the four
tested compounds only EOM caused a significant change in the slope of
the steady-state inactivation curve. Recovery from fast inactivation
was slowed by EOA, EOM and DHOM, suggesting an interaction with the
inactivation gates or a stabilization of the inactivated state.
Structure-Related Effects.
Our previous study used only the
methyl esters of these compounds and showed that
Na+ current was sensitive to DHOM but not to EOM
(Stimers et al., 1999
). It was assumed that the cell's intrinsic
esterase activity would convert these compounds to their free acid
counterparts (DHOA and EOA). Results in this study suggest that this is
not the case. Because DHOA was found to be almost completely without activity against INa, it is very
unlikely that DHOM was converted to DHOA in either the previous study
or the present one. In addition, in this study EOA was found to be more
effective than EOM in its effects on most of the parameters measured.
This further supports the idea that these compounds are not being
de-esterified during these experiments.
Because all of these compounds are highly lipid soluble, it may be
possible that these compounds exert their effects via interactions in
the membrane that change membrane fluidity and indirectly alter INa. In another study, both EOA and
DHOA have also been shown to inhibit
Na+/K+ pump current in
oligodendrocytes (Ha et al., 2002
). This inhibition was also shown to
have no correlation to membrane fluidity (Ha et al., 2002
).
Results presented herein also suggest a direct interaction between the
channel protein and LAM. As noted above, these compounds seem to not be
significantly metabolized in these experiments and their effects occur
rapidly, within 2 min after bath exchange, and wash out rapidly (3-5
min) (Stimers et al., 1999
). Taken together, these results suggest
their effects are exerted extracellularly. In addition, because of the
significant differences between the four compounds in their effects on
Na+ channels, we speculate that they are having a
direct interaction with the Na+ channel proteins.
Previous experiments have shown that polyunsaturated fatty acids can
bind to sodium channel proteins (Kang and Leaf, 1996
), and it would
seem that the four tested compounds act similarly.
Voltage Dependence of Inactivation.
Inhibition of
INa by any compound can occur by a
single mechanism or by a combination of effects. Peak
INa can be inhibited by blocking the
conductance pathway, by shifting the voltage dependence of activation
to more depolarized potentials, or by shifting the voltage dependence
of inactivation to more hyperpolarized potentials. In the data shown in
Figs. 3 and 4 there is no evidence of a shift in the voltage dependence
of activation as the current first activates between
60 and
50 mV
and it reaches its maximum at
30 mV under all tested conditions.
However, the same is not true for inactivation. As shown in Figs. 5 and
6, steady-state inactivation is shifted about 6 mV in the
hyperpolarizing direction by 50 µM DHOM, EOA, and EOM. Furthermore,
EOM caused a significant increase in the slope of the steady-state
inactivation curve. This suggests that the charge on this compound may
be interacting with the voltage sensor or the membrane field in these
experiments. Despite the shift in inactivation to more hyperpolarized
potentials, this is not sufficient to explain the decreased magnitude,
because INa was inhibited even with a
steady-state holding potential of
100 mV, at which there was no
detectable steady-state inactivation. Thus, although the shift in
inactivation could contribute to the block of
INa, it is likely that there is also a
significant block of the channel pore by these compounds. Of course,
this could be due to a block of channel gating rather than a physical
block of the pore.
Kinetics of Recovery from Inactivation.
One mechanism for
inhibiting Na+ current that is exhibited by local
anesthetics is a stabilization of the inactivated state (Jia et al.,
1993
). This is characterized by a slowing of the rate of recovery of
INa from inactivation. The data shown
in Figs. 7 and 8 confirm that three of the compounds do significantly
slow the rate of recovery from inactivation. In addition, there was a
slower component (not slow inactivation) not measured by these experiments that was also slowed, or at least its extent was enhanced, because the fractional recovery over this time period (140 ms) was
significantly reduced. Note that this slowing of recovery was in
addition to the steady-state block produced by these agents, because
these data were normalized to the prepulse current amplitude, not
control amplitude. Together, the shift of the steady-state inactivation
curve and the increased recovery time suggest that these compounds
inhibit INa by stabilizing the
inactivated state of the cardiac sodium channel.
Physiological Significance.
These data are of physiological
significance because slight changes in cardiac sodium current can, over
time, develop into arrhythmias and possibly lead to cardiac arrest.
Furthermore, the characteristics of these LAMs on
INa are similar to the effects of
class I antiarrhythmic agents such as lidocaine and others. This
suggests caution should be used in patients with elevated circulating
fatty acids (e.g., severely burned or ischemic patients) needing
treatment for arrhythmias. Further studies in this area could test the
interaction of these compounds with lidocaine effects on
INa.
We thank Stephanie Hastings and Suzanne Stewart for technical
assistance and Drs. Joomi Ha and Maxim Dobretsov for discussions of the data.
Accepted for publication June 10, 2002.
Received for publication April 29, 2002.
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant HL-60174. M.D.H. was supported by a summer undergraduate fellowship research from the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
LAM, linoleic acid metabolite;
EOA, 9,10-epoxy-12-octadecenoic acid;
DHOA, 9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic
acid;
EOM, 9,10-epoxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester;
DHOM, 9,10-dihydroxy-12-octadecenoic methyl ester.