![]() |
|
|
Vol. 302, Issue 3, 1176-1183, September 2002
Research Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, Laboratory of Pharmacology (J.S.-M., L.M., V.S.), and Natural and Synthetic Drugs Research Center, Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry (J.-F.L.), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels
(SK channels) underlie the prolonged postspike afterhyperpolarization
(AHP) observed in many central neurons and play an important role in
modulating neuronal activity. However, a lack of specific and
reversible blockers of these channels hampers their study in various
experimental conditions. Because previous work has shown that
bicuculline salts block these channels, we examined whether related
alkaloids, namely laudanosine quaternary derivatives, would produce
similar effects. Intracellular recordings were performed on rat
midbrain dopaminergic neurons and hippocampus CA1 pyramidal
cells. Binding experiments were performed on rat cerebral cortex
membranes. Laudanosine, methyl-laudanosine, and ethyl-laudanosine
blocked the apamin-sensitive AHP of dopaminergic neurons with mean
IC50 values of 152, 15, and 47 µM, respectively. The
benzyl and butyl derivatives were less potent. Methyl-laudanosine had
no effect on the Ih current, action potential parameters,
or membrane resistance of dopaminergic cells, or on the decrease in
input resistance induced by muscimol, indicating a lack of antagonism
at GABAA receptors. Interestingly, 100 µM
methyl-laudanosine induced a significant increase in spiking frequency
of dopaminergic neurons but not of CA1 pyramidal cells, suggesting the
possibility of regional selectivity. Binding experiments on laudanosine
derivatives were in good agreement with electrophysiological data.
Moreover, methyl-laudanosine has no affinity for voltage-gated potassium channels, and its affinity for SK channels (IC50
4 µM) is superior to its affinity for muscarinic (IC50
114 µM) and neuronal nicotinic (IC50
367 µM)
receptors . Methyl-laudanosine may be a valuable pharmacological tool
to investigate the role of SK channels in various experimental models.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other
than neurotransmitter receptors and transporters, ion channels
constitute an attractive target to develop new drugs that will be
active on the central nervous system. Currently, the only ion channel
that is well established as a central nervous system target is the
voltage-gated Na+ channel, which is blocked by
antiepileptic drugs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine
(McNamara, 1996
).
Ca2+-activated K+ channels
play a fundamental role in the control of the firing frequency and
pattern of neurons (for reviews, see Sah, 1996
; Vergara et al., 1998
).
Within this class of K+ channels,
small-conductance voltage-insensitive
Ca2+-activated K+ channels
(SK channels) underlie the prolonged postspike afterhyperpolarization (AHP) that is observed in many central neurons. Three closely related
SK-channel subtypes, SK1, SK2, and SK3, have been cloned and are
characterized by different sensitivities to apamin (Köhler et
al., 1996
; Strøbæk et al., 2000
). These subtypes are differentially expressed in the brain (Stocker and Pedarzani, 2000
). Moreover, the
currents underlying AHP have been classified into two groups on the
basis of their kinetic and pharmacological properties. IAHP, the current underlying the medium AHP, is
present in most excitable cells; it is sensitive to the bee venom toxin
apamin, and its activation has been reported to control firing
frequency in tonically spiking neurons. sIAHP,
the current underlying the slow AHP, is present in a few cell types
only; it is apamin-insensitive but can be modulated by various
neurotransmitters, and its activation is responsible for late-spike
frequency adaptation (Sah, 1996
; Vergara et al., 1998
).
Evidence suggests that SK-channel modulation may be interesting in a
range of central nervous system disorders, including Alzheimer's
disease and schizophrenia. Indeed, apamin has been shown to improve
some aspects of memory processing in animal models (Ikonen and
Riekkinen, 1999
; Fournier et al., 2001
), and longer CAG repeats within
the gene of the SK3 channel have been associated with schizophrenia in
various ethnic groups (Chandy et al., 1998
; Dror et al., 1999
),
although the latter observation is controversial (Antonarakis et al.,
1999
).
To validate SK channels (or one of their subtypes) as an interesting
drug target, it is critical to develop adequate tools for studying
their function. Apamin is not ideal because it induces a long-lasting
block of SK channels; moreover, its peptidic nature precludes
iontophoretic application during in vivo experiments. Several currently
available nonpeptidic blockers of SK channels (e.g., (+)-tubocurarine,
bicuculline salts, and gallamine) lack specificity, acting on other
targets, including GABAA, nicotinic, or
muscarinic receptors (Lee and el-Fakahany, 1991
; Dunn et al., 1996
;
Seutin and Johnson, 1999
; Strøbæk et al., 2000
). Recently, novel
nonpeptidic blockers of SK channels have been synthetised and
evaluated. Among these bis-quinolinium cyclophanes, UCL1684 has been
found to be the most potent compound, having an
IC50 value of 3 nM on AHP of rat superior
cervical ganglion neurons (Campos Rosa et al., 2000
). However, to our
knowledge, a comprehensive screening of various receptors and channels
is not available for these compounds, making it difficult to assess
their degree of selectivity.
Given the structural analogy between bicuculline and laudanosine, a
metabolite of the neuromuscular relaxant atracurium, we decided to
evaluate the ability of laudanosine and its methyl, ethyl, butyl, and
benzyl derivatives to selectively block SK channels. Both
electrophysiological and binding experiments were performed. The
electrophysiological study was done on rat midbrain dopaminergic neurons and hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells. Midbrain dopaminergic neurons display a prominent apamin-sensitive AHP of medium duration, which appears to be mediated by SK3 channels (Shepard and Bunney, 1991
;
Wolfart et al., 2001
). Hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells present both a
medium, apamin-sensitive and a slow, apamin-insensitive AHP (Stocker et
al., 1999
). SK1 and SK2 subunits are highly expressed in this region
(Stocker and Pedarzani, 2000
). Binding experiments on SK channels,
voltage-gated potassium channels, and muscarinic and nicotinic
receptors were performed on rat cerebral cortex membranes.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiological Experiments.
The methods used
were similar to those described previously (Seutin et al., 1997
). Male
Wistar rats (150-200 g) were used. They were housed and handled in
accordance with guidelines of the National Institute of Health
(National Institutes of Health Publication 85-23, 1985). Animals were
anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg i.p.) and decapitated. The
brain was excised quickly and placed in cold (~4°C) artificial
cerebrospinal fluid of the following composition 126 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM
KCl, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 1.2 mM
MgCl2, 2.4 mM CaCl2, 11 mM
glucose, and 18 mM NaHCO3, saturated with 95%
O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). A
block of tissue containing the midbrain or the hippocampus was cut into
horizontal or transverse slices, respectively (thickness 350 µm), in
a Vibratome (Lancer, St. Louis, MO). The slice containing the region of
interest was placed on a nylon mesh in a recording chamber (volume 500 µl). The tissue was held in position with two electron microscopy
grids weighed down by short pieces of platinum wire. The slice was
completely immersed in a continuously flowing (~2 ml/min), heated
solution (35°C) of the same composition as indicated above. Most
recordings of dopaminergic neurons were made from neurons located in
the substantia nigra pars compacta. Identification of dopaminergic and
CA1 pyramidal cells was performed as described previously (Scuvée-Moreau et al., 1997
; Seutin et al., 1997
).
). All recordings were made in
the bridge balance mode, using an NPI SEC1L amplifier (NPI Electronic
GmbH, Tamm, Germany). The accuracy of the bridge was checked throughout
the experiment by examining the voltage deflection induced by a small
(
50 pA) current injection. The potential of the extracellular medium
was measured at the end of each experiment, and its absolute value was
within 5 mV of that set to 0 at the start. Membrane potentials and
injected currents were recorded on a Gould TA240 chart recorder (Gould
Instrument Systems, Valley View, OH) and on a Fluke Combiscope
oscilloscope (Fluke Corp., Everett, WA). The Flukeview software was
used for off-line analysis in most cases. Some experimental data were
recorded with pClamp (Axon Instruments, Inc., Foster City, CA).
Drug effects on the prominent apamin-sensitive AHP in dopaminergic
neurons were quantified as the percentage of reduction of the surface
area of the AHP (in millivolts per second), which was blocked by a
maximally active concentration of apamin (300 nM; Seutin et al., 1997
20 to
100 pA) to increase the
amplitude of the AHP. Because the amplitude of the AHP is very
sensitive to the firing rate, care was taken to compare all AHPs of one
cell at the same firing rate; this usually necessitated only very small
adjustments of the injected currents (i.e., less than 20 pA).
Excitability of dopaminergic neurons and CA1 pyramidal cells was
assessed by applying long (
1 s) depolarizing pulses of increasing
intensities, at about 4- to 5-s intervals, and counting the number of
action potentials elicited by the different pulses; averages of four
pulses of similar intensity were considered in the analysis of the
results. In these experiments, the baseline membrane potential was set
at
60 to
65 mV by negative current injection.
The antagonism at GABAA receptors was quantified
in dopaminergic cells as the ability to antagonize the reduction in
input resistance induced by 3 µM muscimol. Input resistance was
measured by the amplitude of the steady-state voltage deflection
elicited by passing a small hyperpolarizing current (
20 to
60 pA).
These experiments were performed in the presence of tetrodotoxin (0.5 µM) to minimize indirect effects. Cesium (3 mM) or ZD7288
[4-(N-ethyl-N-phenylamino)-1,2-dimethyl-6-(methylamino)-pyrimidinium chloride] (30 µM) were used in these experiments to block the activation of the Ih current (Harris and
Constanti, 1995Binding Studies.
Radioligand binding studies were
performed to assess the affinity of laudanosine and its quaternary
derivatives for SK channels and the affinity of methyl-laudanosine for
voltage-gated potassium channels and muscarinic and nicotinic
receptors. Assays were performed by (Cerep/Paris, France) on rat
cerebral cortex membranes using general procedures described by Hugues
et al. (1982)
for SK channels, by Sorensen and Blaustein (1989)
for
voltage-gated potassium channels, by Richards (1990)
for nonselective
muscarinic receptors, by Pabreza et al. (1991)
for neuronal
-bungarotoxin-insensitive nicotinic receptors, and by Sharples et
al. (2000)
for neuronal
-bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic receptors.
-dendrotoxin, 30 min/22°C
(voltage-gated potassium channels), 0.05 nM
[3H]3-quinuclidinylbenzilate, 120 min/22°C
(muscarinic receptors); 1.5 nM [3H]cytisine, 75 min/4°C (
-bungarotoxin-insensitive nicotinic receptors); and 1 nM
125I-
-bungarotoxin, 150 min/37°C
(
-bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic receptors). Nonspecific binding
was assessed using 0.1 µM apamin, 50 nM
-dendrotoxin, 1 µM
atropine, 10 µM nicotine, and 10 µM
-bungarotoxin, respectively.
Following incubation, membranes were rapidly filtered under vacuum
through glass fiber filters (GF/B, PerkinElmer Life Sciences,
Boston, MA; GF/C, Whatman International, Maidstone, UK; or Filtermat A
or B, PerkinElmer Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD). Filters were then washed
several times with an ice-cold buffer using a cell harvester (Packard;
Brandel Inc., Gaithersburg, MD; or Tomtec, Orange, CT). Bound
radioactivity was measured with a scintillation counter (Topcount,
Packard; LS series, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA; or Betaplate,
Wallac) using a liquid scintillation cocktail (Microscint 0 or Formula
989, Packard) or a solid scintillant (Meltilex B/HS, Wallac).
Laudanosine derivatives were tested in triplicate on SK channels;
methyl-laudanosine was tested in triplicate on voltage-gated potassium
channels and in duplicate on muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. In
each experiment, the respective reference compound was tested at a
minimum of eight concentrations in duplicate to obtain a competition
curve to validate the experiment. The specific radioligand binding to
the receptors is defined as the difference between total binding and
nonspecific binding determined in the presence of an excess of
unlabeled ligand. IC50 values and Hill
coefficients were determined fitting the data to the Hill equation
using nonlinear regression analysis. The inhibition constants
(Ki) were calculated from the
Cheng-Prusoff equation (Ki = IC50/(1 + L/KD), where L
is the concentration of radioligand in the assay and
KD is the affinity of the radioligand for the receptor).
Compounds.
Methyl-laudanosine iodide,
ethyl-laudanosine iodide, butyl-laudanosine iodide, and
benzyl-laudanosine chloride (Fig. 1) were synthesized in our laboratory according to conventional methods. Briefly, a mixture of laudanosine with an excess of alkyl or aralkyl halide in acetonitrile was refluxed overnight. Excess of reagent and
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. For each compound, the
crude quaternary salt was isolated in an acetone/diethyl ether mixture.
Finally, the products were recrystallized from ethanol, methyl ethyl
ketone, diethyl ether/acetone, or dichloromethane/diethyl ether
for methyl, ethyl, butyl, and benzyl derivatives, respectively. Purity
was checked with classical methods, such as elemental analysis, mass
spectrometry, and determination of the melting point.
|
)nicotine bitartrate,
-dendrotoxin,
-bungarotoxin (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO),
laudanosine (purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI),
muscimol, tetrodotoxin (obtained from Tocris Cookson Inc., Ballwin,
MO), 125I-apamin,
[3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate,
[3H]cytisine,
125I-
-bungarotoxin (purchased from PerkinElmer
Life Sciences, Boston, MA), 125I-
-dendrotoxin
(purchased from Amersham Biosciences Inc., Piscataway, NJ), ZD7288
(gift from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE), and SR95531
[2-[carboxy-3'-propyl]-3-amino-6-paramethoxy-phenyl-pyridazinium bromide] (gift from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Paris, France).
Laudanosine was dissolved in ethanol or dimethyl sulfoxide; all other
drugs were dissolved in water.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons.
All recorded neurons
(n = 32) displayed characteristic features of
identified dopamine neurons (Grace and Onn, 1989
), including broad-action potentials (
1 ms at 50% maximum height) with a
threshold close to
40mV, a prominent Ih
current, and a slow AHP, which reached its peak ± 50 ms after the
action potential; their mean input resistance was 183 ± 11 M
.
|
|
60 mV by continuous
current injection (
200 to
300 pA), their resistance was estimated
by measuring the voltage deflection induced by a small injection of
current (
20 to
40 pA), and a robust Ih
current was elicited by current injections of
80 to
120 pA. Methyl-laudanosine had no effect on membrane potential, input resistance (231 ± 22 M
in both control and treatment
conditions), or on the voltage deflection
induced by activation of Ih (10 ± 0.6 mV)
(Fig. 4, A and B). A putative
effect of methyl-laudanosine on GABAA receptors
was also investigated in four cells; methyl-laudanosine (100 µM) did
not modify the decrease in input resistance induced by muscimol (3 µM), whereas the GABAA antagonist SR95531 (10 µM) completely reversed the effect of muscimol (Fig. 4C).
|
60mV. The effect of methyl-laudanosine was
compared with that of apamin. Under control conditions, tonic firing (1 to 4 spikes) was induced by depolarizing pulses of increasing intensities (50 to 200 pA). Both 100 µM methyl-laudanosine
(n = 8) and 300 nM apamin (n = 6)
induced a significant increase in the number of spikes evoked in the
recorded cells; the effect of methyl-laudanosine was reversible after
10 to 20 min in wash (Fig. 5A). The
effect of both compounds was independent of the amplitude of the
injected current (Fig. 5, B and C).
|
Hippocampus CA1 Pyramidal Cells.
In view of the different
regional distribution of SK subunits, it was interesting to investigate
the influence of methyl-laudanosine on the excitability of CA1
pyramidal cells, as these cells have a high level of expression for SK1
and SK2 subunits, contrary to midbrain dopaminergic neurons, which
express mostly the SK3 subunit (Stocker and Pedarzani, 2000
).
Experiments were performed on eight cells; their mean input resistance
was 55 ± 7.5 M
. Under control conditions, long (~1 s)
depolarizing pulses elicited trains of action potentials characterized
by early- and late-spike frequency adaptation (Fig.
6A, left panel). Methyl-laudanosine (100 µM) failed to significantly modify spiking frequency and pattern
(Fig. 6, A and B), whereas apamin (300 nM) induced a significant
increase of the number of action potentials evoked without modifying
the late-spike frequency adaptation (not shown). The effect of apamin was independent of the amplitude of the injected current (Fig. 6C).
|
Binding Studies.
The IC50 and
Ki values determined for laudanosine,
its quaternary derivatives, and the reference compound apamin at
neocortical SK channels are presented in Table
1 and Fig. 3B. The order of affinity was
methyl-laudanosine > laudanosine
ethyl-laudanosine
benzyl-laudanosine > butyl-laudanosine. The
IC50 and Ki
values determined for methyl-laudanosine and the reference compounds at
voltage-gated potassium channels and muscarinic and nicotinic receptors
are shown in Table 2. Depending on the
parameter being considered, the affinity of methyl-laudanosine for SK
channels was 8 to 30 times superior to its affinity for muscarinic
receptors. The affinity for nicotinic receptors was weak or negligible
depending upon the subtype examined (
-bungarotoxin-insensitive or
-sensitive). No affinity for voltage-gated potassium channels could be
detected.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was initiated to identify a specific and reversible blocker of SK channels. Drawbacks of blockers such as apamin, bicuculline, (+)-tubocurarine, and gallamine have been stressed earlier (see the Introduction).
Our results show that quaternary laudanosine derivatives
differentially block the slow AHP in rat dopaminergic neurons, with the
N-methyl derivative being the most potent blocker. This
property, which was previously described for quaternary salts of
bicuculline, namely, bicuculline methyl iodide and bicuculline
methochloride (Seutin et al., 1997
), was suspected given the similarity
of structure between these compounds. Methyl-laudanosine is slightly
more potent as a blocker of the AHP than bicuculline salts, whose
IC50 was found to be 26 µM in the same
conditions (Seutin et al., 1997
). The difference of potency (~10
times) between the methyl derivative of laudanosine and the base is
similar to that reported previously between the quaternary salts of
bicuculline and the base (Seutin et al., 1997
). Increasing the length
of the N-substituent does not increase the activity on SK channels.
Experiments on cell excitability show that apamin and
methyl-laudanosine significantly increase the number of spikes evoked in midbrain dopaminergic neurons by positive current injection. These
results are consistent with other studies indicating a role for SK
channels in the control of the firing frequency of these cells (Shepard
and Bunney, 1991
; Wolfart et al., 2001
). Interestingly, an increase in
the firing frequency of hippocampus CA1 pyramidal cells was observed
with apamin but not with methyl-laudanosine. Our results with apamin
are in agreement with previous studies indicating a contribution of
apamin-sensitive SK channels to the firing properties of hippocampal
pyramidal neurons (Stocker et al., 1999
). The fact that
methyl-laudanosine does not modify cell excitability at a concentration
inducing a maximal block of the AHP in dopaminergic neurons suggests
the possibility that this compound discriminates between SK subtypes.
In fact, recent studies show a high level of expression of SK3 subunits
in midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Tacconi et al., 2001
; Wolfart et al.,
2001
) and a high level of expression of SK1 and SK2 subunits in CA1 to
CA3 pyramidal neurons (Stocker et al., 1999
). Electrophysiological
results thus point to a preferential effect of methyl-laudanosine on
the SK3 subtype of SK channels. However, further studies in slices and in cell lines expressing the various subunits are needed to address this point thoroughly.
Binding data obtained from rat cerebral cortex membranes are in good
agreement with the electrophysiological study on dopaminergic cells and
confirm the good affinity of methyl-laudanosine for SK channels. In
fact, IC50 values obtained in the two kinds of studies are quite similar (~15 µM in electrophysiological studies and ~4 µM in binding experiments). Furthermore, the difference of
potency (~10 times) between laudanosine and its methyl derivative is
also similar in the two studies. With the exception of
ethyl-laudanosine, the order of affinity for SK channels among
laudanosine derivatives (methyl-laudanosine > laudanosine
ethyl-laudanosine
benzyl-laudanosine > butyl-laudanosine)
is comparable with their order of potency as AHP blockers
(methyl-laudanosine > ethyl-laudanosine > laudanosine > benzyl-laudanosine > butyl-laudanosine). As pointed out
earlier, this may be due to the differences in SK subtypes that exist
between brain regions.
Additional data from our study show that methyl-laudanosine has
no affinity for GABAA and nicotinic receptors.
This is an interesting finding because pharmacological studies suggest
that the tridimensional structure of the binding site in SK,
GABAA, and nicotinic channels is similar (Seutin
and Johnson, 1999
). Furthermore, methyl-laudanosine is less potent at
muscarinic receptors than at SK channels. Indeed, more recent
iontophoretic experiments performed in vivo in our laboratory suggest
that local effects of methyl-laudanosine are not due to muscarinic
effects (Seutin V., Massotte L., Liégeois J.-F., and
Scuvée-Moreau J., unpublished results). Finally, both our
electrophysiological and binding studies suggest that
methyl-laudanosine does not interact with fast
Na+ channels, voltage-dependent
K+ channels, or Ih
channels. It should be noted, however, that we cannot exclude an action
of the compound on another receptor or channel.
Methyl-laudanosine has a relatively low potency when compared with apamin or UCL1684. This is probably due to a high off-rate of the compound from the channel that makes it a rapidly reversible blocker. This property may be interesting for pharmacological experiments in which a relatively quick reversal of the effect is needed. Again, our recent in vivo iontophoretic experiments show that this is the case.
Our study demonstrates the pharmacological differences between bicuculline quaternary salts and methyl-laudanosine. Additional modifications of this alkaloid will be performed to further study the structural elements required for a putative selective action on SK-channel subtypes.
In conclusion, the lack of influence of methyl-laudanosine on various neuronal parameters combined with its lack of antagonism at GABAA receptors and its lack of affinity for nicotinic receptors suggest that this agent may become an interesting tool to examine the functional role of SK channels in various experimental conditions.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Synthelabo for the gift of ZD7288 and SR95531, respectively.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 15, 2002.
Received for publication November 13, 2001.
This work was supported in part by Grant 3.4525.98 from the
National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium). This work
has been presented in meeting abstract form: Scuvée-Moreau J,
Liégeois JF, and Seutin V (2002) Effect of laudanosine
derivatives on the apamin-sensitive afterhyperpolarization of rat
dopaminergic neurons
identification of methyl-laudanosine as a new
specific blocker (Abstract). Fundam Clin Pharmacol
16:67.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Jacqueline Scuvée-Moreau, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Research Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Liège, 3 avenue de l'Hôpital (B23), B-4000 Sart-Tilman/Liège 1, Belgium. E-mail: jmoreau{at}ulg.ac.be
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
SK channels, small-conductance voltage-insensitive Ca2+-activated K+ channels; AHP, afterhyperpolarization; ZD7288, 4-(N-ethyl-N-phenylamino)-1,2-dimethyl-6-(methylamino)-pyrimidinium chloride; SR95531, 2-[carboxy-3'-propyl]-3-amino-6-paramethoxy-phenyl-pyridazinium bromide.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4
2 subtype in the modulation of dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes.
J Neurosci
20:
2783-2791This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Ris, B. Capron, C. Sclavons, J.-F. Liegeois, V. Seutin, and E. Godaux Metaplastic effect of apamin on LTP and paired-pulse facilitation Learn. Mem., June 5, 2007; 14(6): 390 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||