Center for Neuropharmacology and Neuroscience, Albany Medical
College, Albany, New York
 |
Introduction |
GABAA
receptors mediate most of the inhibitory synaptic transmission in the
central nervous system and are the principal target of
neuroactive drugs used in the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and
epilepsy. Based on their genetic and structural relatedness, GABAA receptors belong to the nicotinic
superfamily of neurotransmitter receptor ion channels, which also
includes nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh), serotonin type-3
(5-HT3), and glycine receptors.
GABAA receptors are GABA-gated
Cl
ion channels typically composed of two
(1-6), two
(1-3), and one
(1-3) or
1 subunit in a
pentameric assembly (Sieghart, 1995
; Barnard et al., 1998
; Mehta and
Ticku, 1999
). Among the many drugs that act at these receptors are the
benzodiazepines, allosteric modulators that enhance
GABAA receptor signaling by binding to a site at
the
-
subunit interface (Gunther et al., 1995
; Sigel and Buhr,
1997
). Transgenic studies indicate that benzodiazepines exert their
sedative effects and partly their anticonvulsant effects through
1
2
2 receptors (Rudolph et al., 1999
; McKernan et al., 2000
)
and their anxiolytic effects through
2
2
2 receptors (Low et
al., 2000
). Thus, it may be possible for a drug to elicit only a
desired action by targeting a particular receptor subtype.
Zopiclone is a cyclopyrrolone, a class of nonbenzodiazepine drugs that
have high affinity for the benzodiazepine binding site but, relative to
benzodiazepines, produce comparable anxiolytic effects with less
sedation, muscle relaxation, or addictive potential (Piot et al., 1990
;
Sanger et al., 1994
; Karle and Nielsen, 1998
). Racemic zopiclone, which
consists of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers, acts at the
benzodiazepine site to enhance GABAA receptor
binding and function (Im et al., 1993
; Davies et al., 2000
). Although the selectivity of zopiclone is not fully characterized, it is known to
act at
2-bearing GABAA receptors, including
1
2
2 (Im et al., 1993
; Reynolds and Maitra, 1996
; Davies et
al., 2000
). Recent behavioral studies in rodents suggest that the
sedative and anxiolytic activities of
(R,S)-zopiclone are produced mainly by the
(S)-enantiomer (Carlson et al., 2001
), which is metabolized in vivo to (S)-desmethylzopiclone (SEP-174559). SEP-174559
is active on its own and was found selectively to produce anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects; doses 100 times higher were required to
impair locomotor activity or motor coordination (Carlson et al., 2001
).
Yet, the activity of SEP-174559 and its selectivity for various
subtypes of the GABAA receptor have not been described.
The present study profiles the benzodiazepine-like actions of
SEP-174559 in comparison with zopiclone at various
GABAA receptor subtypes and further defines the
spectrum of effects of benzodiazepine-site ligands at other
neurotransmitter receptor ion channels in both the nicotinic and
glutamate receptor superfamilies.
 |
Experimental Procedures |
Cell Cultures and Transfections.
Human embryonic kidney 293 fibroblasts (HEK293, CRL 1573; American Type Culture Collection,
Manassas, VA) were cultured in minimal essential medium supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM glutamine (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) and incubated at 37°C in a 5%
CO2 environment. Cells were plated into
25-cm2 flasks (Falcon Plastics, Oxnard, CA) and
passaged twice weekly to fresh flasks. Excess cells were removed,
plated onto poly-d-lysine-coated 35-mm dishes (Nalge Nunc,
Naperville, IL), and cotransfected the following day with cDNA plasmids
encoding receptor subunits and enhanced green fluorescent protein at a
9:1 ratio. Transfections were done using the LipofectAMINE PLUS
reagents (Invitrogen). Patch-clamp recordings were obtained 12 to
48 h post-transfection. Studies used mammalian cDNA expression
vectors encoding rat GABAA receptor
1
(accession no. L08490),
2 (L08491),
3 (L08492),
2 (X15467),
1 (X57514), and
2 (L08497) subunits, rat nACh receptor
3
(L31621) and
4 (U42976) subunits, the mouse
5-HT3A receptor subunit (M74425), rat NMDA
receptor NR1 (X63255) and NR2B (M91562) subunits, rat
GluR1flip AMPA receptor subunit (M38060), and
rat GluR6 kainate receptor subunit (Z11715).
Patch-Clamp Recording.
Cells were continuously superfused
with standard extracellular solution containing 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl,
5 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 0.1 mg
ml
1 phenol red, pH 7.3. Recording
microelectrodes were fabricated from thin-walled borosilicate glass
capillary tubes (TW150F; World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT)
having resistances of 2 to 4 M
when filled with an internal solution
containing 135 mM CsCl, 10 mM CsF, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM
MgCl2, and 0.5 mM CaCl2, pH
7.2. Whole-cell and outside-out patch recordings were performed in
voltage clamp at a holding potential of
70 mV using an Axopatch 200B
amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Current signals were
filtered at 1 to 3 kHz with an eight-pole Bessel filter (Cygnus
Technology, Delaware Water Gap, PA), digitized at 1 to 20 kHz, and
stored on a Macintosh PowerPC-G3 computer using an ITC-16 interface
(InstruTECH Corporation, Port Washington, NY) under the control of the
data acquisition and analysis program Synapse (Synergistic Research
Systems, Silver Spring, MD).
Rapid Solution Exchange.
Rapid drug applications were
achieved in two ways. In whole-cell recordings of most receptors, a
multivalve solution exchange system was used. Solutions were driven by
a syringe pump at a rate of 2 ml min
1 through a
flowpipe having either four or eight inputs glued together within ~1
mm of a common output. Solution flow-through in each channel was
controlled by a set of upstream three-way solenoid valves (Lee Co.,
Westbrook, CT). Switching between control and drug solutions was
achieved by opening and closing the appropriate valves under computer
control. The rate of solution exchange using this system was
5 ms as
determined from open-tip junction currents but was further limited by
cell diameter. In outside-out patch recordings with GluR1 and GluR6
receptors, the ultrafast solution exchange needed to resolve the fast
response, and kinetic properties of these receptors was achieved using
an LSS-3100 piezotranslator (Burleigh, Fishers, NY). Control and
agonist solutions were driven simultaneously at a rate of 0.3 ml
min
1 through the two parallel barrels of a
theta tube. The membrane patch was positioned in the control stream
near the solution interface and a piezotranslator was used to rapidly
move the theta tube ~50 µm such that the solution interface moved
across the patch. Inputs were then switched to solutions containing
drug and retested. The rate of solution exchange in this system was
100 µs as determined from open-tip junction currents measured at
the end of each experiment.
Data Analysis.
Agonist dose-response data were normalized to
saturation values for each cell and fit by the logistic equation
I = Imax/(1 + (EC50/[agonist])nH),
where Imax is the maximal current at
saturating agonist concentrations, EC50 is the
concentration of agonist that elicits a half-maximal response, and
nH is the Hill coefficient or
steepness factor; these parameters were derived using an iterative
least-squares fitting algorithm.
Materials.
Reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO)
or Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA). SEP-174559,
(R,S)-zopiclone, and the zopiclone enantiomers
were kindly provided by Sepracor (Marlborough, MA). Agonist and drug
stocks were prepared in 0.05 M HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, except
(R,S)-zopiclone, (S)-zopiclone,
(R)-zopiclone, alprazolam, and diazepam were prepared at 20 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide; the final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide
was
0.1%, which was tested and found by itself to have no activity
on the receptors examined in this study. Agonist solutions for
dose-response analyses were prepared freshly by serial dilution.
 |
Results |
Racemic zopiclone [(R,S)-zopiclone] has
been shown to enhance GABAA receptor currents via
the benzodiazepine site (Im et al., 1993
; Davies et al., 2000
). The
molecular actions of its principal metabolite, SEP-174559, have not
been described. To profile the activity and GABAA
receptor selectivity of SEP-174559, GABA-evoked currents were tested by
whole-cell patch-clamp recording in transfected HEK293 cells expressing
various recombinant GABAA receptor subtypes. Effects on related and unrelated neurotransmitter receptor ion channels
were also tested to assess the specificity of drug action. In many
cases, the actions of (R,S)-zopiclone or other
benzodiazepine-site ligands were also tested for comparison.
GABAA Receptor Actions.
To test the influence of
the GABAA receptor
subunit, HEK293 cells were
cotransfected with
1 and
2 subunits alone or in combination with
1 or
2 subunits. Responses were evoked by application of 10 µM
GABA. Representative traces are presented in Fig.
1A. Data are summarized in Table
1. In cells expressing
1
2
2
receptors, coapplication of 2 µM SEP-174559 enhanced GABA-evoked
currents by 11 ± 3% (n = 4). Coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 produced a greater increase of 32 ± 4%
(n = 11). Likewise, 2 and 20 µM (R,S)-zopiclone enhanced GABA responses by
34 ± 8% (n = 5) and 53 ± 11%
(n = 11), respectively. In cells expressing
1
2
alone, neither SEP-174559 nor (R,S)-zopiclone had
any effect up to 20 µM (n = 6). Also, no enhancement
was seen for
1-bearing receptors. Rather,
1
2
1 receptors
were modestly inhibited by 20 µM SEP-174559 by 9 ± 1%
(n = 10). This inhibition of the
1
1
1 subtype
was unexpected but not unique to cyclopyrrolones because 20 µM
alprazolam and 20 µM diazepam also inhibited
1
1
1 currents by
83 ± 5 (n = 4) and 84 ± 7%
(n = 4), respectively.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Subunit dependence of SEP-174559 modulation.
Whole-cell currents were evoked by 10 µM GABA (open columns) in cells
expressing recombinant GABAA subtypes. A, GABAA
receptor 2-subunit is required for SEP-174559 modulation. Open
columns depict the timing of GABA application. Filled columns depict
the timing of coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559. Scale is the same
for all traces. B, modulation by SEP-174559 or
(R,S)-zopiclone is not specific for
receptors of a particular -subunit composition. Filled columns
depict the coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 or 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone. Note the rapid onset of
potentiation by both drugs and relatively rapid recovery from
potentiation after the removal of SEP-174559.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Potentiation of GABAA responses
Values are the percent increase in 10 µM GABA-evoked currents
expressed as mean ± S.E.M. for (n) observations. Drug
concentrations were 20 µM. Subtype differences in potentiation
reflect differences in GABA affinity, see
text.
|
|
To test the influence of the
subunit composition, HEK293 cells were
cotransfected with
1,
2, or
3 in combination with
2 and
2 subunits. Responses were evoked by 10 µM GABA and tested by
coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 or 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone. GABA-evoked responses were
enhanced in all cases regardless of
subunit composition (Fig. 1B);
however, the magnitude of potentiation followed the rank order of
3
2
2 >
2
2
2 >
1
2
2 (Table 1). This
rank order did not result from differences in drug affinities at the
GABAA subtypes. Drug dissociation constants
(Kd) were estimated from the kinetics
of onset (kon) and recovery
(koff) from potentiation using the
equation Kd = koff/kon,
and these values are given in Table 2.
Rather, the rank order reflected differences in GABA affinities of the
various subtypes. To determine this, GABA dose-response curves were
generated in the absence and presence of 20 µM SEP-174559 in cells
expressing
1,
2, or
3 in combination with
2 and
2. Cells
were also examined that expressed
1
2
1 receptors that were
modestly inhibited by SEP-174559. The EC50 for
receptor activation by GABA followed the rank order of
3
2
2 >
2
2
2 >
1
2
2 (Table 3). GABA dose-response curves were
left-shifted by SEP-174559 in all cells expressing
2-bearing
receptors but not altered, or slightly right-shifted, in cells
expressing
1
2
1 receptors (Fig.
2). The Hill coefficient of the
dose-response curve was not altered in any case, suggesting the actions
of SEP-174559 did not involve a change in cooperativity or in the
number of functional GABA binding sites. The magnitude of the
leftward-shift of the dose response was entirely consistent with the
magnitude of SEP-174559 potentiation at any given concentration of
GABA. For example, when
1
2
2 receptors were activated by 2 µM
GABA (EC10), the potentiation by 20 µM
SEP-174559 was 103 ± 17% (n = 5) and by 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone was 227 ± 44%
(n = 5). Moreover, SEP-174559 and
(R,S)-zopiclone did not affect
1
2
2
(n = 4),
2
2
2 (n = 3), or
3
2
2 (n = 3) receptor currents evoked by saturating GABA (1 mM). These data indicate that SEP-174559 enhances GABA binding affinity at all of the
2-bearing
GABAA subtypes tested under our conditions and
provide no indication of any
-subtype specificity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Drug Kd estimates from
koff/kon
Values are mean ± S.E.M. in micromolar for (n)
observations. GABA concentration was 10 µM. Drug concentrations were
20 µM.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
GABA dose-response parameters
Values are EC50 for GABA activation in micromolar. Hill
coefficient is given in parentheses. Drug concentrations were 20 µM.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effects of SEP-174559 on GABA dose-response curves.
Whole-cell currents in cells expressing recombinant GABAA
subtypes were evoked by various concentrations of GABA in the absence
(control) or presence of 20 µM SEP-174559. Superimposed curve fits
are given by the logistic equation I = Imax/(1 + (EC50/[agonist])nH). GABA
EC50 and Hill coefficient (nH)
values are given in Table 2. Data are mean ± S.E.M. for 4 to 12 cells/point.
|
|
The actions of the (R)- and (S)-zopiclone
enantiomers were also examined in cells expressing
1
2
2,
2
2
2, or
3
2
2 receptor subtypes. Responses were evoked
by 10 µM GABA and tested by coapplication of 20 µM
(R)-zopiclone or (S)-zopiclone. Both
(R)- and (S)-enantiomers were found to enhance
GABAA receptor currents (Fig.
3). The (S)-enantiomer was
nearly twice as effective at all
2-bearing subtypes tested (Table
1). The actions of (R)- and (S)-zopiclone
enantiomers also differed in the rate of recovery from potentiation
after drug removal. Potentiation by (R)-zopiclone was
quickly relieved, reminiscent of SEP-174559, whereas the slow recovery
from potentiation by (S)-zopiclone seems to underlie the
prolonged higher affinity action of the racemic.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
GABAA receptor modulation by zopiclone
enantiomers. Whole-cell currents in cells expressing recombinant
1 2 2 receptors were evoked by 10 µM GABA. Open columns depict
the timing of GABA application. Filled columns depict the timing of
coapplication of 20 µM (R,S)-zopiclone
or 20 µM (R)- or (S)-enantiomers. All
reliably enhanced GABAA receptor currents to a similar
extent; however, the slow reversal of
(R,S)-zopiclone potentiation was mimicked
only by (S)-zopiclone. Traces are from a single cell.
Scale is the same for all traces.
|
|
Drug Actions on Other Receptors in Nicotinic Superfamily.
Given their genetic and structural relatedness to
GABAA receptors, it was prudent to investigate
whether SEP-174559 is active at nACh receptors or
5-HT3 receptors. The activity of SEP-174559 was
tested by whole-cell patch-clamp recording in transfected HEK293 cells
expressing either 5-HT3-A or
3
4 nACh
receptors. SEP-174559 did not affect 5-HT3
receptor currents. Responses were evoked by application of 100 µM
5-HT. Coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 did not alter the magnitude
or decay time course of 5-HT-evoked currents (n = 4).
SEP-174559 also did not affect responses evoked by 10 µM 5-HT
(n = 3), which we determined is near the
EC50 for these receptors. Alprazolam (20 µM)
also did not affect 5-HT3 receptor currents
evoked by 10 µM 5-HT (n = 2) or 100 µM 5-HT (n = 2). In contrast, SEP-174559 did inhibit nACh
receptors currents. Responses were evoked by application of 1 mM ACh.
Coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 reduced the magnitude of ACh-evoked
currents by 35 ± 2% (n = 12) (Fig.
4). Similar inhibition by 34 ± 3%
(n = 8) was produced by 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone. Higher concentrations of both
drugs (100 µM) further reduced ACh-evoked responses by 74 ± 2 (n = 7) and 71 ± 2% (n = 3),
respectively. The mechanism of block by SEP-174559 and
(R,S)-zopiclone was further examined and found to
be noncompetitive in that the magnitude of inhibition was not dependent
on agonist concentration (Fig. 5C). In
three cells tested at various membrane potentials, the inhibition also was not voltage-dependent (Fig. 5, A and B). Together, these data suggest an allosteric mechanism of action by which drug binding affects
channel opening or conductance rather than an open-channel blocking
mechanism. Because such inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
(nAChRs) by benzodiazepine-site ligands has not been reported
previously, it was important to determine whether this effect was
unique to cyclopyrrolones. It was not. Coapplication of 20 µM
alprazolam inhibited 1 mM ACh-evoked currents by 78 ± 3%
(n = 4). Likewise, 2 and 20 µM diazepam inhibited
ACh-evoked currents by 21 ± 2 and 94 ± 1%
(n = 5), respectively, suggesting an inhibitory potency
(IC50) on the order of 5 to 10 µM under these
conditions.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nicotinic receptor inhibition by SEP-174559 and
(R,S)-zopiclone. Left, whole-cell
currents in cells expressing recombinant 3 4 nAChRs were evoked by
1 mM ACh. Right, whole-cell currents in cells expressing
5-HT3 receptors were evoked by 100 µM serotonin. Open
columns depict the timing of agonist application. Filled columns depict
the timing of coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 or 20 µM
zopiclone.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nicotinic receptor inhibition by SEP-174559 and
zopiclone is noncompetitive. A, whole-cell currents in cells expressing
recombinant 3 4 nAChRs were evoked by 1 mM ACh at various holding
potentials. Open columns depict the timing of ACh application. Filled
columns depict the timing of coapplication of 100 µM SEP-174559 or
100 µM zopiclone. B, whole-cell currents at various potentials are
normalized to compare the magnitude and kinetics of inhibition by
SEP-174559 and (R,S)-zopiclone. C,
magnitude of inhibition was not dependent on the agonist concentration
used to evoke the nAChR response. Inhibition was also produced by 20 µM alprazolam (ALPZ) and 20 µM diazepam (DIAZ), shown at the right.
Data are mean ± S.E.M. for (n) cells as indicated
above the columns.
|
|
Drug Actions on Receptors in Glutamate Receptor Superfamily.
The activity of SEP-174559 at NMDA-type glutamate receptors was tested
by whole-cell patch-clamp recording in cells expressing the NR1/2B
receptor subtype. NMDA receptor currents were examined in
Mg2+-free extracellular solution and stimulated
by application of 100 µM glutamate plus 10 µM glycine.
Coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 reduced the magnitude of
agonist-evoked currents by 28 ± 4% (n = 5) (Fig.
6). Similar inhibition by 23 ± 5%
(n = 5) was produced by 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone. In contrast, SEP-174559 was
inactive at AMPA- and kainate-type glutamate receptors. These were
tested by examining glutamate-evoked responses in outside-out patches taken from cells expressing the GluR1 AMPA receptor or GluR6 kainate receptor subtypes. Responses were evoked by ultrafast application of 1 mM glutamate. Coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 after preexposure to
the drug did not alter the peak amplitude or decay time course of
either GluR1 (n = 3) or GluR6 (n = 3)
receptor currents (Fig. 6).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
NMDA receptor inhibition by SEP-174559 and
(R,S)-zopiclone. Left, whole-cell
currents in cells expressing recombinant NR1/2B receptors were evoked
by 100 µM glutamate plus 10 µM glycine. Open columns depict the
timing of agonist application. Filled columns depict the timing of
coapplication of 20 µM SEP-174559 or 20 µM
(R,S)-zopiclone. Right, currents in
outside-out patches taken from cells expressing recombinant GluR1 AMPA
receptors or GluR6 KA receptors were evoked by 1 mM glutamate in the
absence or presence of 20 µM SEP-174559.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The actions of SEP-174559 were examined at a variety of
neurotransmitter receptor ion-channel subtypes. As expected, a
benzodiazepine-like enhancement of GABAA receptor
currents was confirmed. The facilitation of GABAA
responses by SEP-174559 required the presence of the
2 subunit,
which is prevalent in vivo (Laurie et al., 1992
; Wisden et al., 1992
;
Fritschy and Mohler, 1995
) and accounts for most high-affinity
benzodiazepine binding (Gunther et al., 1995
). In contrast, SEP-174559
was not specific for any particular
subunit. Rather, SEP-174559 was
broadly active at
1-,
2-, and
3-bearing receptor subtypes.
Estimated Kd values for these
receptors were all in the range of 1 to 6 µM, and the mechanism of
action of SEP-174559 at GABAA receptors was found
to involve an allosteric enhancement of the affinity for GABA binding
as has been proposed for other benzodiazepine-site ligands.
It is perhaps not surprising that modulation by
(R,S)-zopiclone was also not
-subtype
specific. Indeed, (R,S)-zopiclone modulation has
been demonstrated for the
1
2
2 subtype but also for
2
2 absent an
subunit (Im et al., 1993
), suggesting the
subunit is
not important for (R,S)-zopiclone modulation.
Yet, paradoxically, (R,S)-zopiclone binding has
been shown to involve the
-subunit His101 residue, which is a
necessary component of the benzodiazepine binding site (Davies et al.,
2000
). Likewise, our studies also indicate at least some involvement of
the
subunit in (R,S)-zopiclone binding
because Kd estimates from kinetic
analyses of
1-,
2-, and
3-bearing subtypes differed by as much
as 7-fold between
1-bearing (highest affinity) and
3-bearing
(lowest affinity) subtypes. The present study also confirms that
(R)- and (S)-zopiclone enantiomers are both
active at GABAA receptors, whereas
(S)-zopiclone has relatively higher affinity and likely
accounts for much of the action of racemic zopiclone.
In general, SEP-174559 and (R,S)-zopiclone had
similar effects on the various receptor subtypes tested. However, in
all measures of
1-,
2-, and
3-bearing
GABAA receptors, the enhancement produced by
(R,S)-zopiclone was consistently greater than
that produced by SEP-174559 at equimolar concentrations, and kinetic
analyses indicated a 5- to 10-fold higher apparent affinity (lower
Kd) of these receptors for
(R,S)-zopiclone compared with SEP-174559. The
relatively greater enhancement by (R,S)-zopiclone
might reflect its higher affinity for GABAA
receptors or a "superagonist" action at the benzodiazepine site as
has been suggested previously (Davies et al., 2000
). However, because
no enhancement is seen at saturating GABA concentrations, it is likely
that these drugs differ only in their affinity for binding to
GABAA receptors. Thus, the fact that these drugs
have similar actions raises two important questions regarding their in
vivo effects: 1) might some of the actions of
(R,S)-zopiclone in fact result from its
metabolites, including SEP-174559? and 2) why is SEP-174559 the more
potent and selective anxiolytic agent? Unfortunately, the present study
does not answer these questions except to demonstrate the lack of
subtype specificity of both drugs. Satisfactory answers will require
additional pharmacokinetic and pharmacological studies.
With regards to the first question, the available data suggest that
(R,S)-zopiclone and SEP-174559 have similar
molecular mechanisms of action. Given the relatively greater potency of (R,S)-zopiclone compared with SEP-174559, it
seems unlikely that the lower affinity metabolite could account for the
anxiolytic or anticonvulsant effects of
(R,S)-zopiclone in vivo without producing similar
impairments in locomotor activity or motor coordination (Carlson et
al., 2001
). However, in relating drug affinities in vitro to effective
doses in vivo, one should like to know something about the
bioavailability, plasma concentrations, and brain penetration of the
drugs in question. In this regard, zopiclone is rapidly absorbed,
distributed in various tissues, including brain, and achieves plasma
concentrations of 30 to 90 ng ml
1 (100-300 nM)
after therapeutic doses (Gaillot et al., 1983
), which is comparable
with its effective concentration at GABAA receptors in vitro (Table 2; Reynolds and Maitra, 1996
; Davies et al.,
2000
). There are as yet no comparable pharmacokinetic data on
SEP-174559, but it may be important to consider that SEP-174559 is far
more soluble in aqueous solution than zopiclone or benzodiazepines and
so might differ dramatically in its ability to act at central GABAA receptors. If so, this could help to
explain why two drugs with apparently 10-fold different affinities are
generally effective at similar doses, but cannot explain the apparent
selectivity of SEP-174559 in behavioral studies to produce anxiolytic
and anticonvulsant effects without also producing sedation as does (R,S)-zopiclone (Carlson et al., 2001
).
This bears on the second question. Benzodiazepines are thought to exert
their sedative and anticonvulsant effects through
1-bearing
GABAA receptors (Rudolph et al., 1999
; McKernan
et al., 2000
) and their anxiolytic effects through
2-bearing
receptors (Low et al., 2000
). Clearly, SEP-174559 is not selective for
2-bearing GABAA receptors. Neither is
(R,S)-zopiclone. Both drugs are active at
2-bearing receptors, but also at
1- and
3-bearing receptors. Based on our current understanding then, both drugs would be expected to produce anxiolytic effects (via
2), anticonvulsant effects (via
1), and sedation (via
1). (R,S)-Zopiclone
fulfills all of these expectations, whereas SEP-174559 fails to produce
sedation except at very high doses (50- to 100-fold higher than
required for anxiolytic or anticonvulsant effects) (Carlson et al.,
2001
). Together, these observations suggest that other (i.e.,
not
1-,
2-, nor
3-bearing) receptors must be involved in the
sedative effects of benzodiazepine ligands. These effects might involve other GABAA subtypes or receptors outside the
GABAA receptor family. In addition to the
commonly appreciated enhancement of GABAA
receptors, our studies indicate that SEP-174559,
(R,S)-zopiclone, and other classical
benzodiazepines inhibit
1-bearing GABAA
receptors, nACh receptors (
3
4 subtype), and NMDA receptors
(NR1/2B subtype). Such inhibitory effects have not been reported
previously, and their significance to the main effects or side effect
profiles of benzodiazepine-site ligands is unclear. These actions are
relatively low potency. However, it may be prudent to consider whether
these or other similar actions might be related to the sedative,
amnesic properties, or addictive potential of benzodiazepine ligands. As such, it may be informative in future drug development efforts at
least to assess the actions of benzodiazepine-site ligands at nACh and
NMDA receptors.
I thank Elizabeth Cornell, Keri Cannon, and Dr. Stephanie Mah
for technical contributions to this work, Dr. Lindsay Hough for
comments on the manuscript, Drs. Peter Seeburg, Mark Mayer, Stephen
Heinemann, David Julius, Elias Aizenman, and Shigetada Nakanishi for
the various receptor subunit cDNAs, and Sepracor for SEP-174559 and the
zopiclone enantiomers.
Accepted for publication March 27, 2002.
Received for publication February 25, 2002.
This work was supported by the Albany Medical College strategic
research initiative, the Henry Schaffer Foundation, and a grant from Sepracor.