Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
Unité 460, Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Paris,
France
We analyzed the mechanism of action of the antiarrhythmic agent
bertosamil on hKv1.5 channels expressed in Chinese hamster ovary
cells (IhKv1.5) and on the outward current
(Io) of human atrial myocytes (HAMs) by
using the whole cell patch-clamp technique to record current. External
application of 10 µM bertosamil inhibited IhKv1.5, accelerated its time-dependent
decay, and slowed its deactivation. When bertosamil was applied at rest
or intracellularly (50 µM), it accelerated the rate of
IhKv1.5 inactivation without change of the
peak amplitude. At the steady-state effect of intracellular bertosamil,
external drug application only inhibited
IhKv1.5. When cesium was the charge carrier,
bertosamil inhibited IhKv1.5 but had no
effect on its time course. Intracellular tetraethylammonium inhibited
IhKv1.5, suppressed its inactivation, and
prevented bertosamil effects. Bertosamil-treated
IhKv1.5 became highly sensitive to the rate
of membrane stimulation and to cumulative inactivation phenomenon. In
HAMs, bertosamil also increased the rate and extent of
Io inactivation and slowed its recovery from
inactivation, whereas after drug application
Io became highly sensitive to cumulative inactivation phenomenon. In conclusion, bertosamil 1) causes a use-dependent inhibition of the current upon external drug application, and 2) accelerates the rate of current inactivation when applied at
rest or intracellularly. These effects result from both an open-channel
block and acceleration of the rate of channel inactivation and
contribute to the modulation by bertosamil of
Io in HAM.
 |
Introduction |
In
human atrial myocytes the main repolarizing current that activates
during the plateau-shaped action potential is a large voltage-dependent outward K+ current
(Io). This current is composed of an
initial fast-inactivating component, followed by a large slowly
inactivating component; the two components are usually designated
It and
Isus, respectively (Escande et al.,
1987
). The ratio between It and
Isus depends on age (Escande et al.,
1985
) and on clinical conditions such as atrial dilation (Le Grand et
al., 1994
) and chronic arrhythmia (Van Wagoner et al., 1997
) and is
controlled by intracellular regulatory factors (Tessier et al., 1999
).
This current is sensitive to a number of pharmacological agents and is
probably an important target of antiarrhythmic drugs used to treat
atrial tachyarrhythmia (Wang et al., 1995
). The molecular basis of this
current and the mechanisms involved in its regulation are thus a focus
of attention.
A large part of this current is probably the functional expression of
hKv1.5 channels, which are abundant in human atrial myocardium (Tamkun
et al., 1991
; Fedida et al., 1993
; Wang et al., 1993
). These
channels, when expressed in cell lines, carry a rapidly activating
outward current that, in control conditions, inactivates slowly and has
pharmacological characteristics similar to those of
Isus (Snyders et al., 1993
). Indeed,
cloned hKv1.5 channels are remarkably sensitive to a number of
compounds, including antiarrhythmic agents (Snyders and Yeola, 1995
;
Delpon et al., 1999
). By binding to a hydrophobic site in the internal
mouth of the pore of Kv channels, some of these compounds block the channels in the open position, with therapeutically valuable
use-dependent inhibition of the repolarizing current (Snyders and
Yeola, 1995
; Yeola et al., 1996
; Longobardo et al., 1998
). In addition,
the frequency-dependent inhibition of the outward
K+ current by drugs that block the channels in
the open state can also arise from modulation of the intrinsic gating
mechanisms, which govern the rate of channel inactivation (Baukrowitz
and Yellen, 1996a
; Rasmusson et al., 1998
). This has been described with tetraethylammonium (TEA) compounds, which, by blocking the channel
pore, reduce the outward K+ flow into the pore
and, in turn, decrease the occupancy of K+
binding sites involved in the regulation of pore closure, thus leading
to fast inactivation of shaker channels (Baukrowitz and Yellen, 1996b
).
Bertosamil is a structural analog of
tedisamil, a new bradycardic class III antiarrhythmic agent with
potential therapeutic efficacy in both atrial and ventricular
tachyarrhythmia (Wallace et al., 1995
; Fischbach et al., 1999
; Singh,
1999
). We have previously reported that bertosamil accelerates the
apparent rate of inactivation of the outward current in human atrial
myocytes (Tessier et al., 1997
), acting in the same way as tedisamil on
the outward current in rat ventricular myocytes (Dukes and Morad,
1989
). The effect of bertosamil on the outward K+
current of human atrial myocytes is also characterized by its irreversibility, enhanced current inactivation with membrane
depolarization, a shift in its voltage-dependent activation, and an
acceleration of the time to peak current, raising the possibility that
the drug causes profound changes in the gating properties of channels carrying the outward current. Because bertosamil mainly affects Isus, the underlying mechanism may
involve modulation of hKv1.5 channels.
This study was undertaken to investigate 1) the mechanism of action of
bertosamil on cloned hKv1.5 channels expressed in the Chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cell line, and 2) whether the same mechanism affects
endogenous channels in human atrial myocytes, and, if so, how it
contributes to the modulation of the outward current by bertosamil.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Cell Preparation and Transfection.
CHO cells were
cultured in Ham's F-12 medium (nutrient mixture;
Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France), 10% fetal calf serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/ml
amphotericin B (Invitrogen). hKv1.5 cDNA was generated by polymerase
chain reaction from human heart RNA, checked by sequencing, and
inserted into the pIRES2-EGFP expression vector (CLONTECH, Palo Alto,
CA), the internal ribosome entry sequence generating a dual cistronic mRNA. Transfection was done using the FuGENE 6 kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany), with 6 µl of transfection reagent and 2 µg of plasmid DNA per 35-mm dish; 36 h after the outset of
transient transfection, cells were trypsinized and plated. Voltage-clamp recording revealed typical hKv1.5 currents in 90 to 100%
of cells expressing green fluorescent protein.
Atrial Myocyte Isolation.
With approval from the ethics
committee of our institution, myocytes were enzymatically isolated from
samples of right atrial appendage obtained from 10 patients aged 44 to
78 years undergoing heart surgery for coronary insufficiency, mitral
valve disease, or aortic valve disease. Most patients were on
pharmacological treatments, which were stopped at least 10 h
before surgery (Ca2+ channel blockers,
-adrenergic antagonists, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors, or nitric oxide donors). The isolation procedure has been
described in detail elsewhere (Tessier et al., 1999
). Briefly, small
fragments of atrial appendage were cut up and washed in Krebs-Ringer
solution containing 35 mM NaCl, 4.75 mM KCl, 1.19 mM
KH2PO4, 16 mM
Na2HPO4, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM
glucose, 25 mM NaHCO3, 134 mM saccharose, and 30 mM 2,3-butane-dione oxime, pH 7.4, gassed with 95%
O2, 5% CO2 and gently
agitated at 37°C. Cells were dissociated by several enzymatic steps
by using the same Krebs-Ringer solution without 2,3-butane-dione oxime
and containing collagenase (type IV; Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier,
France) and protease (type XXIV; Sigma). Isolated myocytes were
resuspended in a solution containing 2 mM Ca2+
and incubated at 37°C with continuous gassing with 21%
O2, 5% CO2 for at least
1 h before use.
Current Measurements.
Currents were recorded by using the
patch-clamp technique in the whole cell configuration with borosilicate
glass pipettes (tip resistance 1.5-2 M
) connected to the input
stage of the patch-clamp amplifier (Axoclamp 200A; Axon Instruments,
Union City, CA). Resistance in series was compensated to obtain the fastest capacity transient current (percentage of resistance
compensation between 0 and 5%); the capacitive and leakage currents
were not compensated. Currents were filtered at 5 kHz, digitized with a Labmaster (Lab Rac, Scientific Solution, Mentor, OH), and stored on the hard disk of a personal computer. Data were acquired and analyzed with Acquis 1 software (G. Sadoc, Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique Unité Propre de Recherche 2212, Gif/Yvette, France).
Solutions and Drugs.
Cells were continuously bathed in an
external solution containing 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
HEPES, and 10 mM glucose, adjusted to pH 7.3 with NaOH. For potassium current measurements in control myocytes, Na+ was
replaced by an equimolar concentration of choline chloride, Ca2+ channels were blocked with 5 × 10
4 M Cd2+, and
10
5 M atropine was added to the external
solution to prevent muscarinic receptor activation. In experiments
testing the effects of TEA and increasing external
K+ concentration
([K+]o), NaCl in the
external solution was replaced with an equimolar concentration of TEA
or KCl. Patch pipettes were filled with an internal solution containing
115 mM K-aspartate, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgATP, 5 mM Na-pyruvate, 3 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES, adjusted to pH
7.2 with KOH. In experiments testing the effects of internal TEA,
K-aspartate in the internal solution was replaced with an equimolar
concentration of TEA. In some experiments, KCl was replaced by 140 mM
cesium chloride (Cs+). Bertosamil
[3-isobutyl-7-isopropyl-9,9-pentamethylene-3,7-diazabicyclo-(3.3.1) nonane sesquihydrogenfumarate; KC 10784] was a gift from Dr. Ziegler (Solvay Pharma Deutschland, Hannover, Germany). Because bertosamil is a
water-soluble drug, it was dissolved in the external or internal solution. 4-Aminopyridine was obtained from Sigma and was dissolved in
the extracellular solution. All experiments were carried out at room
temperature (22-24°C).
Data Analysis.
Ipeak was
measured as the difference between the amplitude of the peak current
and the zero current; the amplitude of the maintained current
Iss was measured as the difference
between the current measured at the end of the 750-ms test pulse and
the zero current; the amplitude of the initial fast-inactivating
component of the outward current It
was calculated as the difference between Ipeak and
Iss. The extent of
Io or hKv1.5 current inactivation was
quantified by measuring the fraction of outward
K+ current inactivation, defined as the extent of
inactivation = (Itotal
Isteady
state)/Itotal. The tail
current decay was quantified as (tail current beginning
tail
current end)/tail current beginning. The time course of
Io or hKv1.5 current inactivation
elicited by a 750-ms test pulse was best fitted by the sum of two
exponential functions,
|
(1)
|
whereas the current elicited by a 5-s test pulse was best fitted
by three exponential functions: y(t) = A exp(
t/
1) + B exp(
t/
2) + C
exp(
t/
3) + E, where
A, B, and C are amplitude terms;
t is time;
1,
2, and
3 are time
constants of the fast and slow inactivation phases; and D
and E are the amplitude of the steady-state component (eq.
1). The procedure used to normalize the current consisted of dividing
raw values of the digitized current by its maximum, by using Fig.P
version 6.0 software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK).
The concentration-response curves were fitted as follows:
|
(2)
|
where f is the percentage change in
IhKv1.5, IC50 is
the concentration producing half-maximal inhibition,
nH is the Hill coefficient, and [D]
is the concentration of bertosamil tested.
Activation plots were generated by dividing
Ipeak measured at a given potential by
the difference between measured and reversal potential. Data on the
conductance/voltage activation curve were best fitted with a Boltzmann
distribution equation:
|
(3)
|
where G represents the conductance calculated at
membrane potential V, V1/2
the potential at which half the channels are activated, and
k the slope factor.
Recovery from inactivation was well fitted by a two-exponential
function:
|
(4)
|
where A and B are amplitudes, t
is time, and
1 and
2
are time constants.
Statistical Analysis.
Data are presented as means ± S.E.M. Student's paired or unpaired t test was used to
determine the significance of differences, as appropriate. P
values of <0.05 were considered significant.
 |
Results |
Bertosamil Accelerates hKv1.5 Current Inactivation.
In CHO
cells expressing hKv1.5 channels, 750-ms test pulses from
60 to +50
mV delivered at 0.1 Hz elicited a rapidly activating outward current
with a very slow rate of inactivation and a small extent of
inactivation (0.09 ± 0.03, n = 12; Fig.
1A). External application of 10 µM
bertosamil progressively inhibited the current (at +50 mV,
Iss: 862 ± 248 versus 434 ± 132 pA in control and bertosamil conditions, respectively,
n = 12, P < 0.01; Fig. 1A), with a
more marked effect on the current recorded at the end of the 750-ms
test pulse (Iss) than on the peak
(Ipeak). At steady state (reached
after around 20 pulses at 0.1 Hz), this resulted in an increase in the
extent of current inactivation compared with control conditions
(0.41 ± 0.05, n = 12, P < 0.001)
and a slow tail current (extent of decay: 0.67 ± 0.05 versus
0.24 ± 0.06, n = 7, P < 0.001;
Fig. 1B). The effects of bertosamil on the currents were observed when
the drug was applied at rest as illustrated in Fig. 1C, which shows the
current traces recorded in control conditions and after bertosamil
application during a 2-min rest period. The current recorded at the
resumption of stimulation in the absence of drug (to avoid additional
drug binding to the channel in its open state, trace 2) was
characterized by a marked acceleration of time-dependent inactivation,
resulting in steady-state suppression of
Iss and a large transient component (It) (extent of inactivation:
0.11 ± 0.04 versus 0.56 ± 0.06, n = 5, P < 0.05). Further application of bertosamil (traces 3 and 4) inhibited both Ipeak and
Iss
(Ipeak:
21.08 ± 5.10%; extent of inactivation: 0.46 ± 0.12, n = 5, N.S.)
without changing the current kinetics. Analysis of the
concentration-dependent effects of external bertosamil on the
Ipeak yielded
IC50 values of 39 µM
(nH of 1.0 ± 0.2) and 11 µM
(nH of 0.9 ± 0.2) for
Iss (P < 0.05) (eq. 2
under Materials and Methods; Fig.
2, A and B).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effects of extracellular bertosamil on the hKv1.5
current in CHO cells. A and B, cell was pulsed at +50 mV from a holding
potential of 60 mV and then repolarized to 40 mV for 150 ms (at 0.1 Hz) to record the deactivation current (tail current). A, traces of
current in the absence ( ) and presence of 10 µM external
bertosamil (BTe, ); B, tail current in control ( ) and
bertosamil ( ) conditions. Cell capacitance, 46 pF. C, current traces
recorded in control conditions (1), after superfusion of the cell with
external 10 µM bertosamil during a 2-min rest period, at the
resumption of stimulation (2), at the beginning (3) and steady-state
(4) effects of 10 µM bertosamil applied during a train of test pulses
(0.1 Hz). Cell capacitance, 32 pF.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Concentration-dependent effects of external
bertosamil on the hKv1.5 current. Concentration dependence of effect of
bertosamil on Ipeak (A) and
Iss (B), expressed as the ratio of current
amplitude before and after application of various concentrations. Each
point is the average of six to eight measurements; vertical lines show
the S.E.M. and are visible when larger than the symbols.
|
|
Effects of Intracellular Application of Bertosamil on hKv1.5
Current.
To determine whether the rest-dependent effect of
bertosamil arose from drug binding to an internal site, cells were
dialyzed with an internal solution containing 50 µM bertosamil to
obtain a complete drug effect. Figure 3A
shows the superimposition of currents elicited by a test pulse from
60 to +50 mV at 0.1 Hz, just after breaking the patch, and at various
times of cell dialysis with a solution containing 50 µM bertosamil.
Internal bertosamil application caused gradual and marked inhibition of
Iss, whereas Ipeak was not significantly modified;
at steady state, this resulted in a current with a large extent of
inactivation (0.60 ± 0.03, n = 12, P < 0.001) and a slow tail current (extent of tail
current decay: 0.06 ± 0.03, n = 12, P < 0.001; Fig. 2B). To compare the rate of
inactivation of hKv1.5 current between control and internal bertosamil
condition, membrane was depolarized during 5 s to allow the slow
inactivation of the control current (eq. 1). This gave a
1 of 680.4 ± 140.3 versus 29.4 ± 4.1 ms (P < 0.001) and
2 of
3700.1 ± 772.5 versus 295.1 ± 38.3 ms (P < 0.001) in control (n = 7) and bertosamil
(n = 8), respectively (
3 was
around to 4 s). After 5 min of internal bertosamil dialysis at
rest (time required to obtained steady-state dialysis of the cell) the
current recorded at the first pulse was already characterized by a
large It and a suppressed
Iss, with no changes during subsequent
pulses (Fig. 3C). This suggested that the gradual decrease in
Iss observed upon intracellular
application of bertosamil during a train of pulses (Fig. 3A) resulted
mainly from slow dialysis of the drug. External application of 10 µM
bertosamil in the presence of intracellular drug caused a additional
inhibition of both Ipeak and
Iss
(Ipeak:
29.26 ± 4.43%,
n = 4, n = 5, P < 0.05; Iss:
24.70 ± 4.10%,
n = 4, P < 0.05; Fig. 3D). Figure
4 shows representative traces of currents
elicited by 10-mV incremental 750-ms test pulses delivered at a
frequency of 0.1 Hz from a holding potential of
60 mV in CHO cells
dialyzed with control (Fig. 4A) or bertosamil-containing (Fig. 4B)
internal solution. The peak outward current-voltage relationship,
normalized to control, was identical in the two conditions, whereas
Iss was reduced in intracellular
bertosamil conditions; the effect was significant at potentials above 0 mV (normalized currents at +50 mV, 0.76 ± 0.02 versus 0.32 ± 0.04 in control and bertosamil conditions, respectively,
n = 11, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4, C and D).
The activation curve of the current was not modified by internal
bertosamil (V1/2: 4.1 ± 1.3 in C versus
2.5 ± 1.2 in intracellular bertosamil
(BTi), n = 8, N.S.; k: 23.0 ±1.5
in C versus 26.4 ± 1.8, n = 8, N.S.) (eq. 4 under Materials and Methods; Fig. 4E). These results suggested
that bertosamil modulated IhKv1.5 by
binding to distinct extra- and intracellular sites on the channel, the
latter mediating the acceleration of the apparent rate of current
inactivation.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, effects of intracellular bertosamil
(BTi): superimposition of currents elicited by test pulses
from 60 to +50 mV and repolarized to 40 mV (at 0.1 Hz), just after
breaking the patch ( ) and at steady-state dialysis (5 min) ( )
with a 50 µM bertosamil-containing internal solution; B, tail
currents in control ( ) and bertosamil ( ) conditions. Cell
capacitance, 18 pF. C, trace of current elicited by the same protocol
as in A after 5 min of intracellular dialysis with an internal solution
containing 50 µM bertosamil at rest. Cell capacitance, 21 pF. D,
superimposition of current traces elicited by test pulses from 60 to
+50 mV and then to 40 mV (at 0.1 Hz) at the steady-state effect of
internal application of 50 µM bertosamil ( ) and upon external
application of 10 µM bertosamil ( ). Cell capacitance, 15 pF.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of internal bertosamil on the voltage
dependence of the hKv1.5 current. Traces of currents elicited by 10-mV
incremental test pulses from 60 to +50 mV (at 0.1 Hz) in control
conditions ( ) (A) and at the steady-state effect of 50 µM
bertosamil ( ) (B). Cell capacitance, 17 pF. C, peak and steady-state
current-voltage (I-V) relationships of hKv1.5 currents;
Iss, steady-state current ( );
Ipeak, peak current ( ). Values are
means ± S.E.M. (n = 8) of measurements with
different CHO cells. D, peak ( ) and steady-state ( ) I-V
relationships of hKv1.5 currents in the presence of 50 µM
intracellular bertosamil. E, activation curve of
Ipeak in control conditions ( ) and on 50 µM bertosamil exposure ( ). Error bars in C, D, and E (S.E.M.) are
visible when larger than the symbols.
|
|
Ionic Sensitivity of Bertosamil Effect on Current.
In these
experiments we examined the mechanism responsible for the apparent
acceleration of IhKv1.5 inactivation
by bertosamil. First, we examined whether the nature of the monovalent
cation flowing through the channels modulated the effect of bertosamil. Because the Cs+ current carried by hKv1.5
channels inactivates much less markedly than the
K+ current (Fedida et al., 1999
), we tested the
effect of replacing internal K+ by 140 mM
Cs+, which caused about a 5-fold reduction in
current amplitude without changing the activation threshold (around
40 mV). As illustrated in Fig. 5A, the
Cs+ current elicited by 750-ms pulses at +50 mV
was inhibited by 10 µM external bertosamil applied during a train of
pulses (
11.45 ± 3.92%, n = 5, P < 0.05), but its extent of inactivation was unaffected (0.04 ± 0.01 versus 0.05 ± 0.02, n = 5, N.S.). The effects of bertosamil on the
steady-state amplitude of the Cs+ current was
significant at potentials above 0 mV (Fig. 5B). As controls, and to
check that the drug effectively bound to the channels, we used an
external solution containing 80 mM potassium to shift the reversal
potential for K+ (around +15 mV versus
88 mV in
control conditions), such that an inward potassium current could be
recorded in the potential range of the voltage dependence activation of
hKv1.5 channels (Fig. 5, C and D). Figure 5C shows a superimposition of
inward K+ currents recorded during a test pulse
at
20 mV, before and after bertosamil application, in the same CHO
cell as in Fig. 5A. In contrast to its effect on the outward
Cs+ current, bertosamil not only suppressed the
inward K+ current but also increased its extent
inactivation (0.12 ± 0.02 versus 0.34 ± 0.01, n = 4, P < 0.001; Fig. 5C). Figure 5D
shows the effects of bertosamil on the 80 mM K+
currents at various potentials (n = 4). After
bertosamil application in the presence of 80 mM external potassium and
drug binding to the channels, the time-dependent inactivation of the
Cs+ outward current (test pulse to +50 mV),
recorded again in the absence of external potassium, was still not
altered.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of bertosamil on the Cs+ current.
A, superimposition of current traces elicited by test pulses from 60
to +50 mV and then to 40 mV (at 0.1 Hz) in CHO cells dialyzed with a
pipette solution containing 140 mM Cs+, 0 mM K+
in control conditions ( ) and upon external application of 10 µM
bertosamil ( ). Cell capacitance, 25 pF. B, current-voltage
relationships of the Cs+ current in control conditions
( ) and after bertosamil exposure ( ). C, superimposition of
current traces recorded in the same cell as in A (i.e., the same
Cs+ internal solution) but bathed with an external solution
containing 80 mM K+ and elicited by depolarizing pulses to
20 mV from a holding potential of 60 mV in the absence ( ) and
presence ( ) of 10 µM external bertosamil. Cell capacitance, 40 pF.
D, current-voltage relationships of the current recorded with 80 mM
external K+ in control conditions ( ) and after
bertosamil exposure ( ). Each point is the average of six to eight
measurements; vertical lines show the S.E.M. and are visible when
larger than the symbols.
|
|
Bertosamil Effects Are Suppressed by Internal TEA.
External
application of 30 mM TEA had a small but significant effect on the
current recorded in the presence of intracellular bertosamil
(Ipeak:
16.75 ± 2.60%,
P < 0.05; rate of inactivation:
fast: 33.2 ± 4.4 versus 44.4 ± 5.0 ms, n = 7, P < 0.01; extent of
inactivation: 0.64 ± 0.05 versus 0.56 ± 0.06, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig.
6A). An effect on the current obtained
during bertosamil treatment was also observed when the
[K+]o was increased (40 mM [K+]o versus 5 mM).
High [K+]o reduced the
amplitude and rate (Ipeak:
22.21 ± 2.69%, P < 0.01;
fast: 47.34 ± 6.10 versus 68.98 ± 8.30 ms, n = 7, P < 0.01) and the
extent of current inactivation (0.57 ± 0.07 versus 0.49 ± 0.07, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig. 6B).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, in CHO cells expressing hKv1.5 channels,
superimposed currents evoked by 750-ms step depolarization from a
holding potential of 60 to +50 mV (at 0.1 Hz) before ( ) and after
exposure to 30 mM TEA ( ), recorded at the steady-state effect of
internal 50 µM bertosamil. Cell capacitance, 33 pF. B, superimposed
current tracings with 750-ms depolarizing pulses from a holding
potential of 60 to +50 mV (at 0.1 Hz) at the steady-state effect of
internal 50 µM bertosamil, recorded with 5 mM ( ) and 40 mM ( )
external K+. Cell capacitance, 14 pF. The left-hand panels
show raw data, and the right-hand panels show data after normalization
to peak current values.
|
|
Intracellular application of TEA had a marked effect on the current and
its modulation by bertosamil. Figure 7A
shows that cell dialysis with an internal solution containing 30 mM TEA
reduced the current amplitude (
41.70 ± 6.20%,
n = 8, P < 0.01) and slowed the rate
of tail current decay (extent of tail current decay: 0.69 ± 0.01 versus 0.38 ± 0.07, n = 8, P < 0.01; Fig. 7B). At steady-state dialysis with 30 mM TEA, external
application of 10 µM bertosamil during a train of pulses at 0.1 Hz
had no significant effect on the rate of inactivation and slightly
reduced the current amplitude (
7.94 ± 3.50%, n = 5, P < 0.05; Fig. 7C). TEA suppression of the
effects of bertosamil on current inactivation was already maximal at 3 mM TEA (Fig. 7D). Moreover, in the presence of TEA, bertosamil failed
to alter the time course of the current, even at a concentration of 100 µM.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of internal TEA on the outward hKv1.5
current. A, CHO cell was pulsed, at 0.1 Hz, to +50 mV from a holding
potential of 60 mV and then repolarized to 40 mV for 150 ms to
record the tail current; current traces were obtained just after
breaking the patch ( ) and at the steady-state effect of 30 mM
internal TEA ( ). B, tail currents elicited on return to 40 mV
after 750-ms depolarizing pulses at +50 mV, at the beginning ( ) and
steady state of internal TEA application ( ). Cell capacitance, 15 pF. C, using the same depolarizing protocol as in A, superimposition of
current traces obtained at the steady-state effect of 30 mM internal
TEA ( ) and upon 10 µM bertosamil exposure ( ). Cell capacitance,
18 pF. D, concentration-dependent effect of TEA on the bertosamil
effect, expressed as changes in the extent of outward current
inactivation. Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M., and stars
indicate statistical differences relative to control;
n = 8 at each concentration, except for 3 mM
(n = 4).
|
|
Effects of Rate and Duration of Membrane Depolarization on Current
Treated with Bertosamil.
After bertosamil application, the current
became highly sensitive to the frequency of membrane depolarization, as
indicated by experiments with a protocol involving delivery of a pair
of depolarizing pulses from
60 to +50 mV separated by an increasing time interval. In control conditions, the hKv1.5 current had almost entirely recovered after the shortest time interval tested (96.10 ± 0.75% with a 4-ms interval, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig. 8A),
whereas the amplitude of the current elicited by the first pulse
slightly decreased (85.10 ± 0.20%, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig. 8A). After intracellular application of
bertosamil, It was suppressed at the
shortest coupling interval and slowly recovered with increasing
interval duration: 80% of It had
recovered with an interval duration of 0.55 ± 0.21 s versus
<5 ms in C (n = 7, P < 0.0001) and
with rate constant
1 = 142 ms and
2 = 2687 ms, n = 7 (eq. 5 under Materials and Methods; Figs. 8B and 10). To
discriminate between channel recovery from drug binding or from
inactivation as the main mechanism responsible for the effect of the
rate of stimulation on It, several
protocols known to modulate channel inactivation were tested (Aldrich,
1981
). As shown in Fig. 9, prolonged
membrane depolarization with 5-s test pulses delivered at 0.1 Hz had a
slight transient effect on control current, whereas in the presence of
intracellular bertosamil it caused a marked suppression of
Ipeak (
23.7 ± 3.6%,
n = 8, P < 0.001) but not
Iss (
3.9.1.7, n = 8, N.S.; Fig. 9). Likewise, after intracellular bertosamil application, an
increase in the rate of membrane depolarization from 0.1 to 1 Hz caused
a marked and persistent decrease in the peak current, with little
effect on Iss (n = 5)
(Fig. 9, C and D). When the cell was again paced at the low frequency
of 0.1 Hz, It showed slow partial
recovery (Fig. 9). In human atrial myocytes, too, bertosamil
accelerates the rate of Io
inactivation (Tessier et al., 1997
) and slows its recovery from
inactivation (
1 = 83 versus
1 = 170 ms, n = 7, P < 0.001; time necessary for 80% current recovery:
0.25 ± 0.02 versus 1.32 ± 0.30 s, n = 7, P < 0.0001; Fig.
10); in addition, the current underwent
a cumulative inactivation phenomenon at high rates of membrane
depolarization as illustrated in Fig.
11. Taken together, these results
indicate that bertosamil increases the sensitivity of both the hKv1.5
current and Io in human atrial myocytes to the rate of stimulation and to cumulative inactivation phenomena.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of bertosamil on the kinetics of current
reactivation. Representative traces of the recovery from inactivation
of the hKv1.5 current in control conditions (A) and at the steady-state
effect of 50 µM intracellular bertosamil (B) with a protocol
consisting of two identical 750-ms pulses from 60 mV to +50 mV, with
interpulse intervals from 4 to 5000 ms. Cell capacitance, 16 and 21 pF,
respectively.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of prolonged membrane depolarization on hkV1.5
current recorded in control condition (A) and after the steady-state
internal application of 50 µM bertosamil (B). Cell capacitance, 26 and 22 pF. Effect of increasing the rate of membrane depolarization
from 0.1 to 1 Hz on hkV1.5 current recorded in control condition (C)
and after the steady-state internal application of 50 µM bertosamil
in CHO (D). Cell capacitance, 27 and 25 pF, respectively. E, time
course of inhibition of the peak current by high rate of depolarization
and of its recovery at the resumption of the low rate of stimulation
(0.1 Hz).
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Effects of bertosamil on the kinetics of current
reactivation. A, time course of current recovery from inactivation, by
using two 750-ms pulses from 60 to + 50 mV with interpulse intervals
from 4 to 5000 ms, recorded in atrial myocytes in the absence ( ) and
presence of bertosamil ( ) and in CHO cells treated with bertosamil
( ).
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Effect of increasing the rate of membrane
depolarization from 0.1 to 1 Hz after 10 pulses in atrial myocytes in
the absence (A) and presence (B) of 50 µM internal bertosamil. Atrial
myocyte capacitance, 112 and 138 pF, respectively.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The main finding of this study is that berstosamil, a structural
analog of the antiarrhythmic agent tedisamil, has two effects on the
current carried by hKv1.5 channels: 1) a use-dependent inhibition of
the current observed during external drug application, and 2) an
acceleration of time-dependent current inactivation when the drug is
applied externally at rest, or internally, and that persists after drug
washout. In human atrial myocytes, these effects of bertosamil on
potassium channels may account for the changes in the time- and
use-dependent properties of the outward potassium current.
Mechanisms of Effects of Bertosamil on hKv1.5 Channels.
The
effects of bertosamil on the current carried by hKv1.5 channels may
partly be explained by blockade of the channel pore in its open state.
Such a mechanism could account for the time-dependent decrease in the
current that occurred when bertosamil was applied during a train of
depolarization, together with the increased magnitude of the drug
effect with depolarization and the slowing of the deactivation tail
current. However, various lines of evidence indicate that, in addition
to this classic open-channel blockade, the acceleration of the
time-dependent decrease in the current could also be due to drug
modulation of the rate of channel inactivation. First, the acceleration
of hKv1.5 current decay has also been observed in the absence of
bertosamil in the extracellular medium (applied at rest, Fig. 1C) and
persisted for a long time after the drug was washed out. Second, the
effects of bertosamil on hKv1.5 channels were modulated by
interventions known to alter channel inactivation processes, such as
the nature of the charge carrier, the extracellular concentration of
K+, TEA, and the rate and duration of membrane
depolarization. Third, in the presence of intracellular bertosamil, or
after external application of the drug during a rest period, only the
use-dependent inhibitory effect was observed when the cell was again
exposed to bertosamil, suggesting the existence of distinct sites of
action of this agent. Finally, the effect of prolonged or rapid
depolarization on the current does not support the possibility that the
acceleration of Kv1.5 current decay by bertosamil is due mainly to drug
release from the channel at a rate sufficiently rapid to allow the
current to recover by the next pulse and to be blocked again. Both
protocols caused a persistent inhibition of the transient but not the
steady-state component of the bertosamil-treated current, despite the
use of a pulse interval long enough to allow drug release from the channel.
Kv channels such as hKv1.5, which do not have an
NH2-terminal part acting as an open-channel
blocker, inactivate through a mechanism involving slow conformational
changes at the outer mouth of the pore (Hoshi et al., 1991
). The slow
inactivation of hKv1.5 mainly differs from classical C-type
inactivation by its lower sensitivity to the external ion
concentration, whereas permeating ions have a marked modulatory effect
on this process (Fedida et al., 1999
). For instance, the
Cs+ current carried by hKv1.5 channels
inactivates much less than the K+ current. This
could explain the low sensitivity of the Cs+
current to bertosamil. When K+ was the permeating
ion, the channels in the same cell inactivated much faster and more
extensively after drug application, pointing to a clear ion dependence
of the bertosamil effect. We cannot rule out the possibility that
competition in the channel pore between bertosamil and
Cs+ binding, due, for example, to steric
hindrance. But this is inconsistent with the observations that 1)
Cs+ current is inhibited by bertosamil,
indicating that the drug can bind to the channel in the presence of
Cs+; and 2) after bertosamil application in the
presence of high K+ the decay of the
Cs+ current is still unaltered. The small
magnitude of the effect of high external potassium concentrations on
the current inactivated by bertosamil is also consistent with a
modulation of hKv1.5 channel inactivation (Fedida et al., 1999
).
Quaternary ammonium channel blockers such as TEA can bind to a site in
the outer pore mouth and prevent slow C-type channel inactivation (Choi
et al., 1991
). This is not the case of hKv1.5 channels, because their
inactivation is poorly sensitive to external TEA, even after
acceleration by bertosamil. TEA can also modulate slow C-type
inactivation by binding, with relatively low affinity, to a site in the
P-loop that is accessible on the intracellular part of the channel and prevents channel inactivation by an "allosteric" mechanism
(Baukrowitz and Yellen, 1996b
). We found that intracellular application
of TEA reduced the amplitude of the current and slowed its
deactivation, suggesting that TEA blocks the channel and slows its
transition from the open to the closed state. This is consistent with
the inhibition by TEA and its derivatives of the deactivation gating of
K+ shaker channels (Choi et al.,
1993
). In the presence of intracellular TEA, bertosamil had a small
inhibitory effect but failed to accelerate the rate of current
inactivation, suggesting that TEA, by stabilizing the open-state
channel, prevents bertosamil modulation of the conformational changes
underlying channel inactivation (Choi et al., 1993
). The suppression by
TEA of the effects of bertosamil on the current was not
concentration-dependent and was not prevented by increasing the
bertosamil concentration, making it unlikely that the two drugs compete
for the same binding site.
The high current sensitivity to the frequency of stimulation after
bertosamil application can also be explained by the acceleration of the
rate of hKv1.5 channel inactivation by bertosamil. We found that
increases in the rate or duration of membrane depolarization caused a
gradual and persistent decrease in the current amplitude. This
cumulative inactivation process (Aldrich, 1981
; Marom and Levitan,
1994
; Tessier et al., 2001
) probably reflects the fact that recovery
from inactivation is slow and that the number of channels available at
the next pulse falls gradually as the time between pulses is reduced.
Recently, it has been reported that the acceleration of the Kv1.5
current by nifedepine is mainly due to open-channel blockade
independent of C-inactivation, because the drug rapidly binds and
unbinds, which is not the case of the persistent bertosamil effects on
K+ current (Lin et al., 2001
).
This is not the first report of pharmacological modulation of the slow
inactivation of Kv channels. For instance, tetraethylammonium compounds
after blocking the channel pore, promote C-type inactivation by
reducing outward K+ flow and, in turn, reducing
occupancy of the K+ binding site involved in the
regulation of pore closure, a process referred to as the permeation
mechanism (Baukrowitz and Yellen, 1996b
). By analogy with the effects
of quaternary ammonium blockers, and given that bertosamil acts on the
cytoplasmic side of the channel, it is possible that the drug binds
near the internal mouth of the pore, reduces K+
flow when the channels open, and thereby accelerates C-type
inactivation. It is well established that the hKv1.5 channel has
binding sites for various antiarrhythmic agents, which are located on
the intracellular C-terminal part of the
-subunit. Through their
hydrophobic interactions with sites located in the S6 segment, these
compounds cause stereoselective open channel blockade, resulting in
time-dependent current relaxation and a slowing of the tail current,
which might also reflect a degree of acceleration of hKv1.5 channel
inactivation when K+ flux is sufficiently reduced
(Snyders and Yeola, 1995
; Longobardo et al., 1998
; Delpon et
al., 1999
). Indeed, the similar effects of various compounds, including
bertosamil, on hKv1.5 channels raise questions on the significance of
these internal binding sites, which may be a structural requirement for
normal channel function (England et al., 1995
; Morales et al., 1996
).
Physiological Consequences.
Our findings support previous
reports that bertosamil and its analog tedisamil modulate the outward
potassium current in rat ventricular (Dukes and Morad, 1989
) and human
atrial myocytes (Tessier et al., 1997
) by accelerating its
time-dependent inactivation. In this study we found that, in
bertosamil-treated myocytes, Io recovers slowly from inactivation and undergoes marked cumulative inactivation when the rate of stimulation is increased, in a manner reminiscent of the behavior of the hKv1.5 current after drug
application. The outward current in human atrial myocytes is the sum of
distinct current components that may also be altered by bertosamil,
thus preventing a direct extrapolation of the data obtained with cloned channels to the endogenous current. However, in a previous study we
found that, in human atrial myocytes, bertosamil had little effect on
the outward current that remained after application of 200 µM
4-aminopyridine, suggesting a prominent effect of the drug on hKv1.5
channels (Tessier et al., 1997
).
Irrespective of the exact nature of the endogenous channels modulated
by bertosamil, our observation that an antiarrhythmic agent regulates
the mechanisms that control outward potassium current inactivation
might have important implications. For instance, in keeping with the
contribution of hKv1.5 channels to the repolarization of human atrial
myocytes (Courtemanche et al., 1998
), bertosamil might have significant
effects on the frequency-dependent adaptation of action potential,
which is largely controlled by the inactivation, and the rate of
recovery from inactivation, of the outward K+
current (Escande et al., 1985
).
Accepted for publication October 31, 2001.
Received for publication July 13, 2001.
This work was supported by grants from the Société
Française de Cardiologie and from the Association Française
contre les Myopathies.