|
|
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 2, 521-525, February 2002
1A-Adrenoceptors Mediate Sympathetically Evoked
Pupillary Dilation in Rats
Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evidence suggests that in some species (cats, rabbits, and
possibly humans)
-adrenoceptors in the iris dilator muscle are "atypical" in that they cannot be readily classified by
conventional criteria. This study was undertaken in an attempt to
characterize the
-adrenoceptor subtype(s) mediating sympathetically
elicited mydriasis in rats. Frequency-response pupillary dilator curves were generated by stimulation of the preganglionic cervical sympathetic nerve (1-32 Hz) in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Evoked
responses were inhibited by systemic administration of nonselective
-adrenergic antagonists, phentolamine (0.3-10 mg/kg) and
phenoxybenzamine (0.03-1 mg/kg). The selective
1-adrenergic antagonist, prazosin (0.01-1 mg/kg), also
was effective, although
2-adrenergic antagonism with
rauwolscine (0.1-1 mg/kg) was not.
1A-Adrenoceptor-selective antagonists,
2-([2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl]aminomethyl)-1,4-benzodioxane (WB-4101; 0.1-1 mg/kg) and 5-methylurapidil (0.1-1 mg/kg), as well as
the
1D-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist
8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7,9-dione (BMY-7378; 1-3 mg/kg), were used to determine the subtype(s) involved. Evoked mydriasis was significantly antagonized by both WB-4101 and
5-methylurapidil but not by BMY-7378. These results suggest that,
unlike some other species, adrenoceptors in the rat iris dilator
mediating neurogenic mydriasis are "typical" and, in addition, can
be characterized as being primarily of the
1A-adrenoceptor subtype.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is generally claimed that the
iris dilator, which controls the size of the pupil in concert with the
sphincter muscle, is innervated by sympathetic nerves via postsynaptic
1-adrenoceptors (Hoffman and Taylor, 2001
).
However, controversy exists concerning the pharmacological properties
of these adrenoceptors. For example, in cats, both neural and
pharmacological activation of the iris dilator muscle are refractory to
antagonism by the prototypical, selective
1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin and the
nonselective
-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine (Hey et al.,
1988
; Koss and Gherezghiher, 1988
; Koss et al., 1988
, 1990
). In
rabbits, pupillary dilation observed after topical application of
1-adrenoceptor agonists is blocked by
phentolamine but not by prazosin (Murray and Leopold, 1985
).
Recently, pharmacological and molecular cloning studies have
established structural and functional heterogeneity among
1-adrenoceptors.
1-Adrenoceptors now are classified into three
subtypes denoted by
1A,
1B, and
1D
corresponding to the cloned subtypes
1a,
1b, and
1d (for
reviews see Hieble et al., 1995
; Docherty, 1998
; Zhong and Minneman,
1999
). All three subtypes exhibit high affinities for prazosin. Based
on results of functional studies, the existence of an atypical subtype
(
1L), with low affinity for prazosin, has been
postulated but not yet cloned (Flavahan and Vanhoutte, 1986
; Docherty,
1998
). Ensuing with this new classification, efforts have been made to
clarify the distribution and function of these subtypes in different
tissues, including the iris dilator muscle.
Takayanagi et al. (1992)
first suggested that the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype mediates
sympathetically evoked mydriasis in rabbits. Their results are based on
the susceptibility to chloroethylclonidine, an alkylating agent
originally thought to selectively inactivate the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype, but later found also
to inactivate
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptor subtypes (Xiao and Jeffries,
1998
). Using more specific ligands, Nakamura et al. (1999)
reported
that, in rabbits, the
1L-adrenoceptor subtype
may mediate pupillary dilator responses. In rats, the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype is shown to mediate
constriction of irideal blood vessels (Gould and Hill, 1994
) and the
production of excitatory junction potentials in the iris dilator muscle
(Hill et al., 1993
). However, a detailed analysis of
-adrenoceptors
in the mediation of contractile responses of iris dilator has not been
conducted in this commonly used species.
The present series of in vivo experiments were performed to determine
1) the pharmacological profiles of
-adrenoceptors mediating neurally
elicited mydriatic responses and 2) the receptor subtype(s) involved.
Our results suggest that, unlike cats and rabbits, adrenoceptors mediating sympathetically evoked mydriasis in rats are more
"typical" and can be categorized into the current classification
scheme. In addition,
1A-adrenoceptors seem to
mediate sympathetic pupillary dilator responses.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal Preparation. All studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and were undertaken in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (312-580 g) were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg i.p. + 5 mg i.v. as needed). A femoral artery and vein were cannulated for monitoring blood pressure (Statham P23 pressure transducer; Statham, Murray Hill, NJ) and for i.v. drug administration, respectively. The trachea was intubated. One cervical preganglionic sympathetic nerve was carefully separated from the vagus nerve and crushed proximally. Rectal temperature was maintained at approximately 37°C with a Deltaphase isothermal pad (Braintree Scientific, Inc., Braintree, MA). Pupillary diameter was measured using a ruler with a 0.1-mm scale under an Olympus surgical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) installed with a green light filter. Heart rate was derived from the pressure wave using a Grass tachograph (7P4D; Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA).
Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation. A bipolar electrode was placed under the separated cervical sympathetic nerve (proximal to superior cervical ganglion) and covered with mineral oil. The stimuli, generated by a Grass S88 stimulator (Grass Instruments), consisted of 10-s trains of 5-V pulses (width 2 ms, frequency 1-32 Hz), which elicited reproducible pupillary dilations. Each mydriatic response was allowed to recover to the basal level before the next higher frequency of stimulation was applied. Frequency responses were generated approximately 15 min after i.v. drug or saline administration. No significant alterations of blood pressure or heart rate were observed during nerve stimulation.
Drugs and Data Analysis. Phentolamine hydrochloride, prazosin hydrochloride, phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride, WB-4101, and 5-methylurapidil were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Rauwolscine hydrochloride was obtained from Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA), and BMY-7378 dihydrochloride was obtained from Tocris Cookson Inc. (Ballwin, MO). All solutions of drugs were prepared in sterile physiological saline, with the exception of prazosin [2.5% glucose (w/v), 2.5% glycerol (v/v)]. Doses administered represent the respective salts.
Nonlinear regression analysis was used to calculate the dose of antagonist that caused 50% inhibition of the pupillary dilation mediated by adrenoceptor activation at 8 Hz. The discharge rate of sympathetic nerves in vivo seldom exceeds 6 to 8 Hz (Folkow, 1952| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Responses to Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation.
A basal pupillary
diameter of 0.64 ± 0.05 mm (n = 52) was observed
after preganglionic sympathetic nerve section. As shown in Fig.
1, electrical stimulation of sympathetic
nerves produced reproducible frequency-response curves of pupillary
dilation at 1 to 32 Hz in anesthetized rats. No alterations of the
contralateral pupillary diameter were seen, indicating lack of central
reflex effects. To avoid rapid blood pressure changes, the doses of
antagonists used in this study were administered (i.v.) slowly over 1 to 3 min. All of these drugs produced expected systemic hypotension but
were without significant effect on resting pupillary size.
|
Effects of Nonselective
1-Adrenoceptor
Antagonists.
Initial experiments were undertaken to determine
whether the rat also has "atypical" adrenoceptors in the pupil
dilator muscle mediating neurally evoked mydriasis, as is seen in cats.
Nonselective, prototypical
-adrenergic antagonists, phentolamine
(0.3-10 mg/kg) and phenoxybenzamine (0.03-1 mg/kg), as well as the
selective
1-adrenergic antagonist, prazosin
(0.01-1 mg/kg), were administered systemically. In other experiments,
the
2-adrenergic antagonist, rauwolscine
(0.1-1 mg/kg), was tested. Frequency-response curves were generated
before and 15 min after cumulative antagonist administration. As shown
in Fig. 2, neurally elicited mydriasis
was antagonized by phentolamine, phenoxybenzamine, and prazosin in a
dose-dependent fashion. In contrast, rauwolscine produced a modest
potentiation of the response. Pupillary dilator responses were not
totally blocked by the
1-antagonists used.
Maximal inhibitory effects and ID50 values of
these antagonists are summarized in Table
1.
|
|
Effects of Selective
1A-Adrenoceptor
Antagonists.
To determine whether
1A-adrenoceptors were involved, anesthetized
animals were given cumulative doses of the partially selective
1A-adrenergic antagonist WB-4101 (0.1-1
mg/kg, i.v.) and the highly selective
1A-adrenergic antagonist 5-methylurapidil
(0.1-1 mg/kg, i.v.). As above, frequency-response curves were
generated before and 15 min after different doses of these antagonists
(Fig. 3). Both agents inhibited evoked
pupillary responses, in a dose-related manner. Increase of the dosage
of both drugs to 3 mg/kg did not produce further inhibition (data not
shown). The degree of maximal blockade achieved by WB-4101 (1 mg/kg)
and 5-methylurapidil (1 mg/kg) was similar to that seen with
nonselective
1-adrenergic antagonists (Table
1).
|
|
Effect of the Selective
1D-Adrenoceptor
Antagonist.
The potent and selective
1D-antagonist BMY-7378 (1-3 mg/kg) was
administered to determine whether
1D-adrenoceptors were involved in the
mediation of sympathetically evoked pupillary dilations. As shown in
Fig. 5, BMY-7378 had no effect on the
evoked pupillary frequency-response curve.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular and pharmacological investigations indicate a mixed
population of
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in the
iris dilator muscle. Analysis of mRNA levels in the iris of rats
(Vidovic and Hill, 1995
) and rabbits (Nakamura et al., 1999
) suggests
that the most abundant transcript is that for the
1A-adrenoceptor gene, which is followed by the
gene for the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype. Only minimal
1D-adrenoceptor gene transcription is
seen. In accordance with these findings, binding studies also
demonstrate a predominance of the
1A-adrenoceptor over the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype in the iris of
rabbits, with no
1D-adrenoceptors found
(Nakamura et al., 1999
; Wikberg-Matsson et al., 2000
). However,
functional studies concerning the role of these adrenoceptor subtypes
are incomplete.
The goal of the present study, conducted in anesthetized rats, was to
functionally characterize the
-adrenoceptors in the iris dilator
muscle mediating neurogenic mydriasis. We observed evoked mydriatic
responses to be dose-dependently blocked by prazosin (
1), phentolamine (
1,
2), and phenoxybenzamine
(
1 >
2), but not by
rauwolscine (
2). These results support the
conclusion that a "typical" adrenoceptor subtype(s) is involved.
This is consistent with the in vitro finding that contraction of the
rat iris dilator is sensitive to blockade by phentolamine (Narita and
Watanabe, 1982
) and that constriction of blood vessels, as well as
production of excitatory junction potentials in the rat iris, are
sensitive to prazosin (Hill et al., 1993
; Gould and Hill, 1994
).
Similarly, in mice, topical application of
1-adrenoceptor agonists, methoxamine and
phenylephrine, causes pupillary dilations that are readily inhibited by
both prazosin and phentolamine (Fawcett et al., 1993
).
Using a similar sympathetic nerve stimulation technique, it is apparent
that the cat iris dilator is endowed with "atypical" adrenoceptors
that are resistant to blockade by both prazosin and phentolamine (Koss
and Gherezghiher, 1988
; Koss et al., 1990
). Schaeppi et al.
(1966)
also were unable to inhibit electrical activation of the
isolated iris dilator muscle of cats with phentolamine. However, these
adrenoceptors are readily antagonized by phenoxybenzamine and WB-4101
but not by either rauwolscine or yohimbine (Koss and Gherezghiher,
1988
; Koss et al., 1990
). Under the current classification, it
seems that the proposed
1L-adrenoceptor may
mediate sympathetically evoked mydriasis in the cat.
Insensitivity to prazosin is also seen in rabbits in that topical and
systemic administration of prazosin does not antagonize the mydriasis
induced by
1-adrenoceptor agonists (Murray and Leopold, 1985
). Unlike other
-adrenergic antagonists such as phentolamine and phenoxybenzamine, which cause a pronounced miotic response, prazosin only has a minimal effect on pupillary size of
rabbits (Mittag, 1983
). Nakamura et al. (1999)
recently reported that
1L-adrenoceptors, rather than previously
suggested
1B-adrenoceptors (Takayanagi et al.,
1992
), may mediate contraction of the rabbit iris dilator muscle in
response to both exogenous and endogenous norepinephrine. It is of
interest, however, that
1L-adrenoceptor sites
are not detected in binding studies (Nakamura et al., 1999
).
To assess which subtype(s) was involved in our model, three currently
available subtype-selective antagonists were used. WB-4101 is
moderately (about 20 times) selective for the
1A- over the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype (Zhong and Minneman,
1999
). 5-Methylurapidil is reported to have 75- to 140-fold higher
affinity for
1A- than for
1B-adrenoceptors (Hanft and Gross, 1989
;
Eltze, 1997
) and shows in vivo selectivity for the
1A- over the
1D-adrenoceptor subtype at 1 to 3 mg/kg, in
rats (Castillo et al., 1998
). By inference, 5-methylurapidil may also
be selective for
1A- over
1B-adrenoceptors at this dose range, in view
of the fact that it exhibits lower affinity for
1B- than for
1D-adrenoceptors (Eltze, 1997
). BMY-7378 displays 126- and 100-fold affinity for
1D-adrenoceptors over that for the
1A- and
1B-adrenoceptor subtypes, respectively (Goetz
et al., 1995
). The latter two drugs have been repeatedly used in vivo
to characterize the functional role of the respective subtypes (Zhou
and Vargas, 1996
; Ibarra et al., 1997
; Castillo et al., 1998
).
Currently, no selective antagonists for the
1B-adrenoceptor are available.
The present combination experiments demonstrated that the residual
mydriatic response seen after 1 mg/kg 5-methylurapidil was not further
antagonized by high doses of either prazosin or phenoxybenzamine. This
suggests that 1 mg/kg 5-methylurapidil blocked all the response
mediated by
1-adrenoceptors and that
1A-adrenoceptors play a major role. The doses
of BMY-7378 at 0.1 to 1 mg/kg have been clearly shown to be selective
for the
1D-adrenoceptor subtype (Zhou and
Vargas, 1996
). The lack of effect of BMY-7378 (1-3 mg/kg) suggests
that
1D-adrenoceptors are not involved.
Obviously, one limitation of our conclusion is the lack of selective
ligands for the
1B-adrenergic subtype to
directly evaluate the role of this subtype in the iris dilator muscle.
Our observation that
1A-adrenoceptors almost
totally mediated the mydriatic response in rats seems to contradict
results from a previous study by Hill et al. (1993)
, showing that
excitatory junction potentials, measured in the rat iris dilator muscle
using an intracellular recording technique, are mediated by the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype. This conclusion is
based primarily on the effect of chloroethylclonidine, the
effectiveness of which to discriminate different
-adrenergic subtypes is controversial (Xiao and Jeffries, 1998
). It is possible that two different subtypes (
1A and
1B) may mediate these two processes (muscular
contraction versus excitatory junction potential, respectively),
because it has been shown that the amplitude of excitatory junction
potentials does not necessarily reflect the degree of the muscular
contraction (Bolton and Large, 1986
; Hill et al., 1993
).
Neurally evoked pupillary responses are not completely blocked by
-
and
-adrenoceptor antagonists (Hill et al., 1991
). In the present
study, we confirmed this observation in that neither nonselective nor
subtype-selective
-adrenoceptor antagonists, given either singly or
in combination, could totally antagonize the evoked pupillary response.
A similar situation was also seen in the vasculature in that
-adrenergic antagonists do not completely block the pressor response
to spinal stimulation in pithed rats (Castillo et al., 1998
). The
residual component may be due to corelease of other transmitters (e.g.,
neuropeptide Y, ATP, and others) from sympathetic nerve terminals.
Indeed, neuropeptide Y released from sympathetic nerves during
long-duration, high-frequency stimulation produces irideal
vasoconstriction in rats (Newhouse and Hill, 1997
). In addition,
purinergic transmission mediates contraction of the iris dilator muscle
in rabbits (Muramatsu et al., 1994
).
In humans, the adrenoceptor subtype(s) mediating neurally evoked
mydriasis is still controversial. Phentolamine blocks contraction of
isolated human iris dilator muscle evoked by electrical stimulation (Yoshitomi et al., 1985
). Prazosin inhibits neurogenic, as well as
phenylephrine-induced, pupillary dilations (Mortlock et al., 1996
).
Based on the common clinical use of the miotic drug dapiprazole, which
shows higher affinities for
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptors than for the
1B-adrenoceptor subtype, it has been proposed
that the
1A-adrenoceptor subtype mediates
neurally induced mydriasis (Eltze, 1997
). However, others have
suggested that
-adrenoceptors of human iris dilator may be
characterized as the
1L-adrenoceptor subtype,
because prazosin only exhibits low potency in antagonizing phenylephrine-evoked contraction of isolated iris dilator muscle (Ishikawa et al., 1996
). Taken together, these observations suggest that
1A- or
1L-adrenoceptors mediate neurally evoked
mydriasis in humans.
Species variations appear to exist with regard to involvement of
1A- or
1L-adrenoceptor subtypes between rabbits,
cats, rats, and humans. Interestingly, the
1L-adrenoceptor gene still eludes
identification (for review see Docherty, 1998
). In the iris dilator
muscle of rabbits, binding and molecular studies show a predominance of
the
1A-adrenoceptor subtype, with no
1L-adrenoceptors present. In the same study,
however, the functional characterization is that of the
1L-adrenoceptor subtype (Nakamura et al.,
1999
). These observations are consistent with findings by Ford et al. (1997)
that when analyzed functionally, cloned
1a-adrenoceptors display pharmacological
profiles of the putative
1L-adrenceptor subtype. If true, the dominant adrenoceptors mediating neurogenic mydriatic responses in the iris dilator muscle could all be of the
1a-adrenoceptor subtype, which may exhibit
higher or lower affinity for prazosin in different species.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to Linda Hess for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 30, 2001.
Received for publication October 4, 2001.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Michael C. Koss, Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK 73190. E-mail: michael-koss{at}ouhsc.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
WB-4101, 2-([2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl]aminomethyl)-1,4-benzodioxane; BMY-7378, 8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5]decane-7,9-dione.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1D-Adrenoceptors contribute to the neurogenic vasopressor response in pithed rats.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol
12:
584-589[Medline].
1- and
2-adrenoceptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
361:
1-15[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptor subtypes A, B and D.
J Pharm Pharmacol
49:
1091-1095[Medline].
1-adrenoceptor sensitivity in mouse eye.
Neuropharmacology
32:
1373-1379[CrossRef][Medline].
1-Adrenoceptor subclassification in vascular smooth muscle.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
7:
347-349[CrossRef].
1A-adrenoceptor: implications for
1-adrenoceptor classification.
Br J Pharmacol
121:
1127-1135[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
272:
R5-R6[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptor recognition sites by urapidil derivatives and other selective antagonists.
Br J Pharmacol
97:
691-700[Medline].
-adrenoceptor mediates phenylephrine-induced mydriasis in anesthetized cats.
J Ocul Pharmacol
4:
303-309[Medline].
1-adrenoceptors: consensus update.
Pharmacol Rev
47:
267-270[Medline].
1D-adrenoceptors in the rat vasculature.
Eur J Pharmacol
322:
221-224[CrossRef][Medline].
-adrenoceptors in iris dilator muscle of humans, and albino and pigmented rabbits.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
354:
765-772[CrossRef][Medline].
-Adrenoceptor activation of nictitating membrane and iris in cats.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
337:
519-524[Medline].
1-adrenoceptors in the rabbit iris: pharmacological characterization and expression of mRNA.
Br J Pharmacol
127:
1367-1374[CrossRef][Medline].
1B-Adrenoceptor mechanisms in rabbit iris dilator.
Jpn J Pharmacol
59:
301-305[Medline].
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in the eye.
Exp Eye Res
70:
51-60[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptor subtypes by chloroethylclonidine.
Eur J Pharmacol
347:
319-327[CrossRef][Medline].
1-Adrenoceptor subtypes.
Eur J Pharmacol
375:
261-276[CrossRef][Medline].
1D-adrenoceptors have a role in the pressor response to phenylephrine in the pithed rat.
Eur J Pharmacol
305:
173-176[CrossRef][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Lundberg and A. Behndig The Mydriatic Effect of Intracameral Epinine Hydrochloride Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2009; 50(11): 5336 - 5338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Dabisch, M. S. Horsmon, W. T. Muse, R. J. Mioduszewski, and S. Thomson Muscarinic Receptor Dysfunction Induced by Exposure to Low Levels of Soman Vapor Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2007; 100(1): 281 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Dabisch, F. To, E. K. Kerut, M. S. Horsmon, and R. J. Mioduszewski Multiple Exposures to Sarin Vapor Result in Parasympathetic Dysfunction in the Eye but not the Heart Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 354 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Dabisch, D. B. Miller, S. A. Reutter, R. J. Mioduszewski, and S. A. Thomson Miotic Tolerance to Sarin Vapor Exposure: Role of the Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous Systems Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2005; 85(2): 1041 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||