![]() |
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 2, 478-486, February 2002
1-Adrenoceptor Antagonist with Uroselective Properties
Neurological and Urological Diseases Research, Pharmaceutical Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), common in aging males, is
often treated with
1-adrenoceptor antagonists. To
minimize hypotensive and other side effects, compounds with selective
antagonist activity at
1A- and
1D-
(compared with
1B-) adrenoceptors were evaluated that
would block lower urinary tract
1-adrenoceptors in
preference to cardiovascular
1B-adrenoceptors.
Fiduxosin
(3-[4-((3aR,9bR)-cis-9-methoxy-1,2,3,3a,4,9b-hexahydro-[1]-benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrol-2-yl)butyl]-8-phenyl-pyrazino[2',3':4,5] thieno-[3,2-d]pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione;
ABT-980) was tested in radioligand binding assays, isolated
tissue bioassays, intraurethral pressure (IUP) tests in
isoflurane-anesthetized dogs, and blood pressure analyses in
spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Fiduxosin had higher affinity
for cloned human
1a- (0.16 nM) and
1d-adrenoceptors (0.92 nM) in radioligand binding
studies compared with
1b-adrenoceptors (25 nM) or in
isolated tissue bioassays [pA2 values of 8.5-9.6 for
1A-receptors in rat vas deferens or canine prostate
strips, 8.9 at
1D-adrenoceptors (rat aorta), compared
with 7.1 at
1B-adrenoceptors (rat spleen)].
Furthermore, the compound antagonized putative
1L-adrenoceptors in the rabbit urethra (pA2
value of 7.58). Fiduxosin blocked epinephrine-induced increases in
canine IUP (pseudo-pA2 value of 8.12), eliciting only
transient decreases in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in SHR. The
area under the curve (AUC0
60 min) for the hypotensive
response was dose related with a log index value for fiduxosin of 5.23, indicating a selectivity of 770-fold comparing IUP to MAP effects.
Preferential antagonism of
1A- and
1D-
versus
1B-adrenoceptors in vitro, blockade of putative
1L-sites in vitro, and selective effects on lower
urinary tract function versus blood pressure in vivo by fiduxosin
suggest the potential utility of this compound for the treatment of
BPH.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Benign
prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a change in the size, composition, and
function of the prostate gland, leads to obstruction of the bladder and
urethra in middle-aged and elderly males. The enlarged prostate is
composed of glandular epithelium and a large stromal component
containing mostly smooth muscle (Shapiro and Lepor, 1991
). Although the
term BPH might suggest that symptoms arise exclusively from increased
organ size causing mechanical obstruction of urine flow, no correlation
between prostate size and symptom severity has been shown (Shapiro and
Lepor, 1995
). Rather, an important "dynamic" component to BPH
results from alterations in sympathetic control of prostatic smooth
muscle tone, mediated primarily through
1-adrenoceptor mechanisms, more than the
"static" component related to the volume of glandular tissue. Over
the past decade,
1-adrenoceptor antagonists
have transformed BPH therapy from surgical to pharmacological
intervention (Altwein, 1995
), resulting in reduced adverse events
(Barry and Roehrborn, 1997
). However, several approved medications
(e.g., terazosin and doxazosin) were originally identified as
antihypertensive agents (for review, see Hancock, 1996
), which may
explain cardiovascular side effects associated with these compounds.
Since the discovery of subtypes of
1-adrenoceptors1
and of the enrichment of the
1A-subtype in the
human prostate gland (Price et al., 1993
), investigators have pursued
1A-subtype-selective (Hancock, 1996
) and, by
extrapolation, "prostate-selective" antagonists. These compounds
were designed to ameliorate BPH symptoms with fewer adverse effects
(e.g., decreased blood pressure or postural hypotension and syncope)
observed with nonselective
1-blockers. Quinazoline-type
1-antagonists (e.g.,
terazosin and doxazosin) with potent hypotensive and other
cardiovascular effects have in some instances been shown to have
slightly greater affinity for
1B- compared
with
1A-adrenoceptors in functional and
radioligand binding studies (Hancock, 1996
), although this is not
universally observed. Moreover, mice deficient in the
1B-adrenoceptor show diminished blood pressure
responses to phenylephrine injection compared with homozygous controls
(Cavalli et al., 1997
). These observations suggest that
1B-adrenoceptors are more important for blood
pressure regulation, and that compounds having reduced activity at
1B-sites compared with other
1-adrenoceptors would be expected to cause
fewer cardiovascular side effects than classical
1-antagonists (Take et al., 1998
), supporting
the concept that an
1A-selective compound
would be useful in BPH (Hancock et al., 1998a
). Tamsulosin causes fewer
hypotensive side effects in clinical practice (de Mey, 1998
) and in
animal studies (Hancock et al., 1998a
,b
), despite only moderate
differences (
20 fold) in affinity at
1A-
compared with either
1B- or
1D-adrenoceptors (Hancock, 1996
). However,
several highly selective
1A-antagonists
intended to be uroselective, including REC 15/2739 (Leonardi et al.,
1997
) and Ro-70-0004 (Williams et al., 1999
), failed to improve both voiding and irritative symptoms in the clinic, such that the hypothesis of
1A-selectivity correlating to
uroselectivity remains unproven. Recent observations suggest that
blockade of
1A-adrenoceptors may promote
relief of voiding symptoms but not the irritative and filling symptoms
in BPH (Michel et al., 2000
). In contrast,
1D-adrenoceptors may have a key role for
irritative and filling symptoms consistent with detrusor instability
(Broten et al., 1998
; Michel et al., 2000
; Schwinn and Michelotti,
2000
), a frequent and major component of BPH symptomatology (Rosier et
al., 1995
). In a rat model of bladder obstruction, reversal of the
ratio of detrusor
1A- to
1D-adrenoceptors (73:25) was seen after 6 weeks of urethral obstruction (22:75) (Hampel et al., 2000
). Spinal or
supraspinal
1D-adrenoceptors (Smith et al.,
1999
; Michel et al., 2000
) may also be important to control bladder
function. Thus, a selective
1A-/
1D-antagonist,
relative to
1B-receptors, may have the
potential to treat both voiding and filling symptoms of BPH without the
hemodynamic liabilities of currently used agents.
A confounding issue arises from studies of
1L-adrenoceptors, which demonstrate low
affinity for antagonists such as prazosin in some studies (Ford et al.,
1993
; Muramatsu et al., 1994
; Leonardi et al., 1997
; Testa et al.,
1997
). Because signal transduction (Chang et al., 1998
) and radioligand
binding (Ford et al., 1997
; Chang et al., 1998
; Mason et al., 1998
)
assays show low affinity of some compounds at
1a-adrenoceptors, the
1L-site may represent an altered affinity
state of the
1A-subtype (Ford et al., 1997
) or
an artifact (Narayan and Tewari, 1998
).
In this article, the initial in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of
fiduxosin (ABT-980; Fig. 1), a novel
1-antagonist with preferential affinity for
those sites that may be important for BPH pharmacotherapy, namely,
1A-,
1D-, and
putative
1L-adrenoceptors, with low potency at
1B-adrenoceptors, is described. The goal of
these studies was to determine whether this compound might represent a
"uroselective" antagonist.
|
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radioligand Binding Assays.
Radioligand binding assays were
performed as described (Hancock et al., 1998b
), by using recombinant
human
1-adrenoceptors expressed in mouse
fibroblast cells (LTK
). Membranes were prepared
from confluent cells of stable single cell clones as previously
described (Hancock et al., 1998b
).
Isolated Tissue Bioassays for Functional Activity in Vitro.
Rat vas deferens, spleen, or aorta or canine prostate glands (male
beagles aged >3 years) were studied as previously described (Hancock
et al., 1998b
). For isolated rabbit urethra, female New Zealand White
rabbits (1.75-3.5 kg) were sacrificed by means of a 0.5-ml/kg i.p.
injection of pentobarbital solution (Somlethal; J. A. Webster
Inc., Sterling, MA). The urethra was removed with the urinary bladder
and immediately placed into Krebs-Henseleit buffer of the following
composition: 119 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 2.5 mM
CaCl2, 0.01 mM K2EDTA, 20 mM NaHCO3, 1.5 mM
Mg2SO4, 11 mM dextrose, and
0.004 mM propranolol. The urethra was separated from the bladder, cut
into four tissue rings approximately 3 to 4 mm in width, and
subsequently fixed between a stationary glass rod and a
force-displacement transducer as previously described for other
isolated tissues (Hancock et al., 1998b
) at a basal preload of 1.0 g. After equilibration with intermittent rinsing for 45 to 60 min,
tissues were primed with 80 mM KCl, rinsed to basal tension and
stimulated with 10 µM phenylephrine (PE). After 60 min equilibration,
a control (PE) cumulative concentration response was determined for
each tissue. After a 75-min washout, agonist concentration-response
curves were generated in the presence and absence of test compounds and
the data analyzed as described previously (Hancock et al., 1998b
).
Fiduxosin was dissolved in 100% DMSO with subsequent dilution in DMSO.
Because test drugs were diluted 1000-fold in the organ bath, DMSO had
no effect on tissue responses. For studies with fiduxosin, tissues were
rinsed after the initial agonist concentration-response curve, and
fiduxosin was added to the tissue bath and allowed to equilibrate for
4 h. After each hour, fresh buffer was applied and fiduxosin
replaced in the tissue bath.
Measurement of IUP in Anesthetized Dogs.
Experimental
procedures described below were reviewed and approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Abbott Laboratories.
Intraurethral pressure (IUP) responses to i.v. epinephrine (EPI) were
recorded by inserting a balloon catheter into the prostatic urethra
through the penis of isoflurane-anesthetized dogs as previously described (Hancock et al., 1998a
). Briefly, a lubricated 7F Swan-Ganz balloon catheter was inserted into the urethral orifice and advanced until the balloon tip was placed within the bladder. The balloon was
inflated with 1 ml of room air and the catheter slowly withdrawn just
past the first resistance felt at the bladder neck, placing the balloon
within the prostatic urethra. The balloon port of the catheter was
connected to an Abbott Transpac pressure transducer (42556-01; Abbott
Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) interfaced to a data acquisition
system for measurement of IUP. EPI and test compounds were administered
through a cannula in the cephalic vein. In male dogs greater than 2 years of age, EPI causes robust, dose-dependent increases in IUP
between 10 and 50 mm Hg for doses of 10 to 100 nmol/kg i.v.,
respectively (Hancock et al., 1998a
).
Blood Pressure Measurements in Conscious SHR.
MAP (mm Hg)
was measured in rats as previously described (Hancock et al., 1998b
).
In brief, rats (15-20 weeks in age) were anesthetized with
methoxyflurane (Abbott Laboratories) while the left femoral artery and
vein were catheterized using polyethylene 50 tubing for measurement of
MAP and compound administration, respectively. The catheters were
filled with heparinized 0.9% saline (10 U/ml), passed subcutaneously
to a point behind the neck, exteriorized, and the arterial catheter
connected to a Gould Statham P23Dd pressure transducer interfaced to a
Grass polygraph. MAP was determined on-line by using a BUXCO
cardiovascular analyzer (BUXCO Electronics, Sharon, CT). After 2 to
3 h of recovery from surgery and a 30-min predose control period,
each rat was given one dose of a test antagonist i.v. and MAP was
monitored for an additional 2.5 h. The percentage of change from
an average predose control value was calculated for each time point and
the area under the hypotensive response curve from 0 to 60 min
postdosing (T60 AUC) was determined using a
trapezoidal rule integration of that data set. Periodically rats were
exposed to 90° head-up tilt either before or after compound
administration to determine the potential for interference with reflex
control of blood pressure during postural events (Hancock et al.,
1998b
).
Data Analysis and Statistical Procedures.
One-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA; Snedecor and Cochran, 1967
) of individual
Ki values was used to compare compound
potencies in receptor binding assays by using RS/1 (BBN Software
Products, Cambridge, MA) with statistical significance indicated by a
P value < 0.05. For isolated tissue bioassays,
individual pKB values of each compound
were determined and compared across tissue types by using ANOVA
procedures in RS/1. For anesthetized dog experiments, the effects of
antagonists on EPI-induced responses were determined as shifts in the
agonist dose-response curves and data were analyzed according to
previously described methods (Hancock et al., 1998a
). The standard
error and S.E.M. of the pA2 values were
determined using methods previously described (Hancock et al., 1998b
).
Materials. Fiduxosin (ABT-980), A-131701, prazosin, terazosin, doxazosin, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, and REC 15/2739 were synthesized at Abbott Laboratories. [3H]Prazosin (75-80 Ci/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). L-Epinephrine and L-PE were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Phentolamine was obtained from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Summit, NJ).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radioligand Binding Assays.
The potency of fiduxosin in
radioligand binding assays is compared with the predominant clinically
used
1-antagonists terazosin and tamsulosin at
cloned human
1-adrenoceptors (Table
1). The affinity of fiduxosin for
1a-,
1b-, and
1d-adrenoceptors was 0.160 nM (0.096-0.267,
95% CL), 24.9 nM (1.92-32.3), and 0.920 nM (0.659-1.28),
respectively (pKi values of 9.80, 7.60, and 9.04, respectively; Table 1). Fiduxosin was approximately
155-fold more potent at
1a-adrenoceptors than
at
1b-adrenoceptors, but was only 6-fold more
potent at
1a- than at
1d-adrenoceptors. In contrast, terazosin
displayed minor potency differences at the three receptors
[Ki = 1.81 nM (1.45-2.26, 95% CL),
1.16 nM (0.79-1.70), and 0.667 nM (0.549-0.810) for
1a-,
1b-, and
1d-adrenoceptors, respectively
(pKi values of 8.74, 8.94, and 9.18;
Table 1)], with statistical significance achieved only in comparing
the
1a- and
1d-potency values. Tamsulosin was ~20-fold
1a-selective compared with
1b-adrenoceptors
[Ki = 0.029 nM (0.022-0.038 95% CL)
and 0.602 nM (0.328-1.1) for
1a- and
1b-adrenoceptors, respectively], but
nonselective compared with
1d-receptors
[Ki = 0.058 nM (0.044-0.077) for
1d-adrenoceptors] as previously reported
(Kenny et al., 1994
; Hancock, 1996
). (Corresponding
pKi values for tamsulosin were 10.54, 9.22, and 10.24, respectively; Table 1.) Fiduxosin displayed low
affinity for other adrenoceptors, including cloned human
2a- [92 nM (52-160, 95% CL)] and
2c-adrenoceptors [22 nM (12-42, 95% CL)])
and rat neonatal lung
2b-adrenoceptors [21 nM
(12-38, 95% CL)], as well as
-adrenoceptors (2-5 µM; data not
shown). Fiduxosin also had low affinity for 5HT1A receptors in rat
cortex [29 nM (18-47, 95% CL)] compared with its affinity at
1a-adrenoceptors (0.160 nM). Thus, fiduxosin
is approximately 180-fold selective for
1a-
compared with 5HT1A receptors, unlike a number of compounds from the
orthomethoxy piperazine class of compounds (e.g., BMY 7378, 5-methyl-urapidil), which have higher potency for 5HT1A compared with
1a-adrenoceptors (Hancock, 1996
). Similarly,
the 5-methyl-urapidil analog B8805-033 (Eltze et al., 2001
) is at least
10-fold more potent at 5HT1A compared with
1a-adrenoceptors. Likewise, the classical
1a-selective compound WB-4101 (only 3-fold
1a-selective) has high affinity for 5HT1A
receptors (Hancock, 1996
). These
1-antagonists
with high 5HT1A affinity represent a challenge in in vivo
experiments, because of the potential cardiovascular effects of
5HT1A stimulation on central sympatho-inhibitory pathways (Gillis et
al., 1989
). Because of the lack of high affinity for 5HT1A sites by
fiduxosin, no functional analysis of agonist or antagonistic activity
was attempted for this compound.
|
Isolated Tissue Bioassays for Functional Activity in Vitro.
In
agreement with radioligand binding data, fiduxosin was between 27- and
350-fold more potent as an antagonist of
1A-adrenoceptors in rat vas deferens or canine
prostate compared with
1B-adrenoceptors in rat
spleen (Table 2). However, fiduxosin was
intermediate in potency at
1D-adrenoceptors in
the rat aorta compared with
1A-adrenoceptors
in rat vas deferens and canine prostate (Table 2). Fiduxosin was a
competitive antagonist at each receptor, as determined on the basis of
parallel shifts to concentration-response curves, with slopes of the
Schild plots not significantly different from unity and no inhibition
of maximal agonist-induced contractile responses with increasing
concentrations of compound (data not shown). For unknown reasons,
fiduxosin demonstrates weaker antagonism of canine prostatic
1A- compared with
1A-adrenoceptors in rat vas deferens. This is
a phenomenon observed with some, but not all, compounds and may simply
be a reflection of the heterogeneity of the tissues, differences in
protein binding or distribution among compounds, and inherent
variability of the bioassay, or related to the
1L-phenotype observed with some compounds in
assays of prostatic function. For example, like fiduxosin, WB-4101,
doxazosin, and L-terazosin are approximately 10-fold less
potent at canine prostatic compared with rat vas deferens
1A-adrenoceptors (data not shown). In
contrast, prazosin, R-terazosin, and (
)-WB-4101 are less
potent at the canine receptors by only 2- to 4-fold (data not shown),
similar to tamsulosin and terazosin (Table 1).
|
1-antagonists (Fig.
2). The low potency of prazosin and the
other quinazolines to block PE-induced contractions in the urethra
model is consistent with these receptors being of the
1L-type (Leonardi et al., 1997
1a-adrenoceptors in radioligand binding
studies, but not with either the
1b- or
1d-receptor (Fig. 2). As predicted from
radioligand binding data, terazosin was essentially equipotent as an
antagonist of
1B- and
1A-adrenoceptors (Table 2) in isolated
tissues, although it was less potent in rabbit urethra. Tamsulosin, as
previously reported (Hancock, 1996
1A-adrenoceptors, and was not selective for
1A- compared with
1B-adrenoceptors in functional tests in vitro
(Hancock et al., 1998b
|
Measurement of IUP in Dogs.
Fiduxosin, administered at doses
of 30, 100, and 300 µg/kg i.v. (0.051, 0.168, and 0.507 µmol/kg
i.v.) antagonized IUP responses to i.v. EPI in anesthetized dogs (Fig.
3A), presumably via blockade of
1-adrenoceptor-mediated smooth muscle
contraction within the prostatic stroma (Brune et al., 1995
).
Fiduxosin caused rightward shifts to the EPI dose-response curve,
yielding an in vivo pseudo-pA2 value of 8.12 ± 0.17 (Fig. 3B; Table 3). Comparable
data for terazosin and tamsulosin are illustrated in Fig. 3, C to F,
and summarized in Table 3. The rank order of potencies for blocking EPI-induced pressor responses in the dog for fiduxosin and several other
1-antagonists was similar to the potency
order of these compounds at isolated canine prostatic strips, rabbit
urethral smooth muscle, or rat vas deferens (Table 2), less similar at
1D-adrenoceptors in rat aorta, and distinct
from the potency order at rat spleen
1B-adrenoceptors (Table 2). The potency order
for blockade of IUP responses was also highly correlated to compound
affinities in receptor binding assays of cloned human
1a-adrenoceptors for fiduxosin and several
chemical classes of
1-antagonists (Fig.
4A), but lesser correlations were
observed for either
1b- or
1d-receptors (Fig. 4, B and C).
|
|
|
Blood Pressure Measurements in Conscious Spontaneously Hypertensive
Rats.
Fiduxosin, administered to SHR at doses of 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 µmol/kg i.v. (178, 592, 1780, and 5920 µg/kg i.v.), elicited
transient effects on blood pressure, particularly at doses of 0.3, 1, or 3 µmol/kg i.v. (Fig. 5), with no
effect of the lowest dose on MAP compared with vehicle and transient
hypotension with doses between 1 and 3 µmol/kg i.v. (Fig. 5). Only
when the dose of fiduxosin was increased to 10 µmol/kg i.v. was the
hypotensive effect sustained (Fig. 5), although the decrease in MAP
even at the highest dose was considerably less than the hypotension
observed with nonselective
1-antagonists at
equivalent or considerably lower doses (Hancock et al., 1998b
). For
example, prazosin, doxazosin, terazosin, and alfuzosin all decreased
blood pressure by greater than 40% at doses of 1 to 3 µmol/kg i.v.,
generally for the entire observation period of 150 min (Hancock et al.,
1998b
). Note that the lowest dose of fiduxosin tested in SHR (178 µg/kg i.v.) exceeds the highest dose tested in the canine IUP model
(100 µg/kg i.v.), demonstrating that doses of fiduxosin that robustly
block IUP responses in the dog elicit no significant hypotensive effect
in SHR.
|
1-adrenoceptor antagonists (Hancock et al.,
1998b
1-blockers. If the potency (pA2) of fiduxosin to block IUP effects in the
canine is compared with its potency (pED50) to
lower blood pressure, a relative index of selectivity of almost three
orders of magnitude (770-fold) is obtained, making fiduxosin the most
selective of the compounds for IUP compared with MAP effects (Hancock
et al., 1998b
1-adrenoceptor antagonists
was highly correlated to their affinity at
1b-adrenoceptors in radioligand binding
studies (Fig. 4E), but less well correlated with the potency of these
compounds at either
1a- or
1d-adrenoceptors (Fig. 4, D and F,
respectively). It is noteworthy that fiduxosin is the least potent
compound of those tested in measures of hypotensive efficacy (Fig. 4,
D-F) and affinity for the
1b-adrenoceptor,
consistent with the concept that hypotensive effects of
1-adrenoceptor antagonists primarily result
from their antagonism of
1b-adrenoceptors.
SHR were also studied for effects of postural changes on MAP after
intermittent 90° head-up tilt. For fiduxosin, doses of 0.3 and 1 µmol/kg i.v. (178-592 µg/kg i.v.) failed to lower blood pressure
markedly, and there was no further diminution upon head-up tilt (Fig.
6). Fiduxosin (3 µmol/kg or 1780 µg/kg i.v.) slightly reduced MAP, but head-up tilt caused further
diminution of MAP at only the 15-min observation with minimal
additional changes in MAP at times
30 min postdosing (Fig. 6). At the
highest dose of fiduxosin (10 µmol/kg or 5920 µg/kg i.v.), a
moderate additive effect to the postural hypotensive response was noted
beyond 30 min after compound administration (Fig. 6). However, these
hypotensive responses to tilt were considerably less marked than those
observed with other
1-antagonist compounds
(Hancock et al., 1998b
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pharmacotherapy has become the treatment of choice for new cases
of BPH with more than 80% of patients of primary care physicians being
prescribed an
1-antagonist (Narayan and
Tewari, 1998
). Successful amelioration of symptoms has been observed
with each of the long-acting
1-blockers
currently approved for BPH, terazosin, doxazosin, and tamsulosin
(Narayan and Tewari, 1998
). Nevertheless, adverse events often limit
effective pharmacotherapy (de Mey, 2000
). Postural hypotension or other
cardiovascular side effects may be related to the relative lack of
1-adrenoceptor subtype selectivity of agents
such as terazosin and doxazosin as shown by the lower incidence of
these events with tamsulosin (Take et al., 1998
), a compound with high
potency for
1A-adrenoceptors, albeit modest
subtype selectivity (Hancock, 1996
). A number of compounds highly
selective for the
1A-adrenoceptor have been identified in recent years (Testa et al., 1994
; Forray et al., 1995
;
Wetzel et al., 1995
; Ford et al., 1996
) in search of a uroselective agent for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH, but to
date, none have passed clinical development hurdles to validate the
proposition that
1A-adrenoceptor selectivity
can enhance the efficacy or reduce the side effect incidence more
successfully than currently available agents. Fiduxosin represents a
new class of
1-antagonists that may offer the
potential to treat BPH based on its selective blockade of prostatic or
lower urinary tract
1-adrenoceptors compared
with its effects on cardiovascular responses.
Fiduxosin demonstrated high affinity for
1a-adrenoceptors in radioligand binding
studies and
1A-adrenoceptors in functional bioassays, and a high degree of selectivity for these sites in comparison with
1b- or
1B-adrenoceptors. In radioligand binding assays, the compound was 155-fold selective for
1a-adrenoceptors, whereas tamsulosin was only
21-fold
1a- versus
1b-selective. If the lower incidence of
cardiovascular side effect liability encountered with tamsulosin
results from this 21-fold selectivity then fiduxosin would be expected
to have an even lower incidence of cardiovascular effects. This would
contrast with the clinical profile of nonselective
1-blockers such as, e.g., terazosin and doxazosin, which generally are slightly more potent antagonists of the
1b-adrenoceptor (Hancock, 1996
). However, the
clinical profile of tamsulosin may be a function of both receptor
selectivity and optimization of formulation used in therapy of BPH, or
perhaps higher prostatic concentrations of the drug, compared with
plasma, at least in the dog (Sato et al., 2001
). Thus, the clinical
inadequacy of REC 15/2739 or Ro-70-0004 might have resulted from
pharmacodynamic components and/or their lack of antagonistic action on
1D-adrenoceptors. In contrast, key
pharmacological (selective blockade of both
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptors) and pharmacokinetic
properties of fiduxosin (long half-life and prolonged in vivo efficacy;
Witte et al., 2002
) may contribute to a more favorable clinical profile.
Fiduxosin has similar affinities at
1a- and
1d-adrenoceptors in radioligand binding
(differences of 6-fold or less), whereas tamsulosin was only 2-fold
less potent at
1d- compared with
1a-adrenoceptors. These selectivity profiles
are generally maintained in the isolated tissue studies where fiduxosin
was 5-fold more potent at
1A-adrenoceptors in
rat vas deferens compared with its potency at
1D-adrenoceptors in the rat aorta, whereas
tamsulosin actually showed higher potency at rat aortic
1D-adrenoceptors than in any other tissue
studied. Although the exact role of
1D-adrenoceptors remains enigmatic, these
receptors may have a role in bladder function (Broten et al., 1998
;
Malloy et al., 1998
), such that antagonism of these sites could reduce
bladder-related dysfunctional components of lower urinary tract
symptoms in BPH (Schwinn and Michelotti, 2000
). In addition, antagonism
of
1D-adrenoceptors in the central sympathetic innervation of the prostate and bladder by
1A-/
1D-selective antagonists may ameliorate irritative symptoms (Smith et al., 1999
;
Michel et al., 2000
).
Despite the selective antagonism of
1A-adrenoceptors demonstrated by a number of
compounds and the predominance of these receptors in prostatic smooth
muscle both from a functional and molecular biological perspective, the
failure of several
1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonists to demonstrate blockade of both obstructive and irritative symptoms has led to uncertainty regarding the role of
1A-adrenoceptors in BPH symptomatology. In
addition, some studies have indicated pharmacological heterogeneity of
prostatic
1-adrenoceptors (Muramatsu et al.,
1994
). Several investigators (Muramatsu et al., 1994
; Leonardi et al.,
1997
; Martin et al., 1997
; Testa et al., 1997
) have proposed that other
receptor interactions might be of functional importance in controlling
prostatic tone and contribute to uroselectivity. Prostatic
1-adrenoceptors have been suggested to belong
to the
1L-class of adrenoceptors because of
their low affinity for prazosin (Muramatsu et al., 1994
), and the
pharmacological effects of REC 15/2739 have been linked to blockade of
1L-receptors (Leonardi et al., 1997
; Testa et
al., 1997
). In vitro models of the
1L-adrenoceptor have been proposed (Muramatsu
et al., 1995
), including rabbit urethral tissue (Leonardi et al., 1997
;
Testa et al., 1997
), and it has been suggested that blockade of these
receptors would be important to the amelioration of BPH (Leonardi et
al., 1997
; Testa et al., 1997
). Our studies with fiduxosin demonstrated
antagonism of contractions mediated by urethral
1-adrenoceptors, although the potency of
fiduxosin to block these sites was considerably weaker than the potency
observed at
1A-adrenoceptors. However, the
rank order of potencies of a number of selective and nonselective
1-antagonists correlated best with the potency
order at
1a-adrenoceptors, less well with
1d-adrenoceptors, and very poorly with
1b-adrenoceptors. Thus, there appeared to be a
frame shift in the observed potencies of compounds at urethral
1L- compared with
1A-adrenoceptors. These results, and the
observations that potency at
1a/A-adrenoceptors can be modulated by assay
conditions (Ford et al., 1997
), are consistent with the concept that
urethral
1-adrenoceptors belong to the
1A-class. Irrespective of the nomenclature
used, the present data clearly indicate that fiduxosin can antagonize
urethral
1-adrenoceptors more potently than
1B-adrenoceptors, suggestive of
uroselectivity. In contrast, terazosin and tamsulosin, both efficacious
in BPH, are more potent at
1B-adrenoceptors in
vitro than at rabbit urethral
1-adrenoceptors.
In addition, fiduxosin is approximately 10-fold more potent at urethral
1-adrenoceptors than terazosin, suggesting that a compound exhibiting this enhanced potency would offer effective blockade of these sites in the amelioration of BPH symptoms.
The selectivity profile obtained with fiduxosin also suggests that the
compound would have lower cardiovascular effects than other non- or
weakly selective agents such as terazosin, doxazosin, or tamsulosin.
This hypothesis was supported by results obtained in SHR, in which
fiduxosin was less hypotensive than other agents on a mole per kilogram
basis, and also elicited weaker, more transient effects in a postural
hypotension challenge. Similar results have been reported with the
1a-selective compounds Ro-70-0004 (Williams et
al., 1999
), RWJ-38063, and RWJ-69736 (Pulito et al., 2000
), supporting the importance of
1b-adrenoceptors
for cardiovascular function as suggested by data with knockout mice
lacking the
1b-adrenoceptor gene (Cavalli et
al., 1997
). Recently, a novel compound has been described, B8805-033
(Eltze et al., 2001
), with chemical and pharmacological similarities to
5-methyl-urapidil and flesinoxan. B8805-033 is of lower absolute
affinity for
1a-adrenoceptors than fiduxosin but is apparently more selective compared with
1b- and
1d-adrenoceptors (150-1200-fold).
Interestingly, although also less potent at putative
1L-sites compared with
1a-adrenoceptors by approximately 10-fold, B8805-033 maintains high selectivity for
1L-sites compared with either
1b- or
1d-adrenoceptors. However, B8805-033 has
higher radioligand binding affinity at 5HT1A sites than at
1a-adrenoceptors, unlike fiduxosin, which is
180-fold less potent at rat cortical 5HT1A sites. Despite high-affinity
agonist activity at 5HT1A receptors comparable in potency to flesinoxan
and 5-methyl-urapidil, B8805-033 elicits minimal hypotensive effects in
SHR (Eltze et al., 2001
). B8805-033 shows properties of uroselectivity
in the anesthetized dog, with a selectivity ratio of approximately 52. Although the uroselectivity indices differ between studies of B8805-033
and our protocol with fiduxosin, both data sets suggest that compounds with low affinity for
1b-adrenoceptors (such
as B8805-033 or fiduxosin) compared with
1a-,
1L-or
1d-adrenoceptors may have uroselective
properties. Whether the preclinical models available can also elucidate
the relative contribution of
1d-adrenoceptor blockade to amelioration of clinical symptoms of BPH may require clinical evaluation. However, it is of interest to note that although fiduxosin has a high affinity for
1d-adrenoceptors, the compound elicits minor
cardiovascular effects. This would suggest that the
1d-adrenoceptor does not play a substantial
role in blood pressure control. This is underscored by the lower
correlation between
1d-adrenoceptor potency
and hypotension (correlation coefficient of 0.63; Fig. 4F) compared
with
1b-adrenoceptor potency (correlation
coefficient of 0.94; Fig. 4E). In contrast, a similar analysis with a
battery of less subtype-selective compounds was unable to distinguish a
substantial difference in the potential contributions of the
1b- and
1d-adrenoceptor subtypes. In that previous
analysis (Table 9 of Hancock, 1996
), the correlations between
1b- and
1d-adrenoceptor potency and hypotensive
changes in SHR ranged from 0.77 to 0.91. However, the addition of more selective compounds such as fiduxosin to this analysis would suggest that
1d-adrenoceptors are less important for
blood pressure control than
1b-adrenoceptors.
In contrast to weak cardiovascular effects with fiduxosin, the compound
elicited highly potent antagonism of prostatic contractile responses to
epinephrine in anesthetized dogs, confirming the in vivo efficacy of
fiduxosin. In addition, the ratio between IUP effects in dogs and
hypotensive effects in SHR was consistent with the high selectivity for
prostatic effects seen with other
1a/d-selective compounds (Hancock et al.,
1998a
,b
) and indicative that fiduxosin would also selectively
antagonize prostatic versus cardiovascular
1-adrenoceptors in vivo. The results of
additional studies that highlight selective blockade of prostatic
compared with cardiovascular
1-adrenoceptor-mediated effects in conscious dogs will be presented subsequently (Brune et al., 2002
). In summary, preferential antagonism of fiduxosin for
1A-,
and
1D- versus
1B-adrenoceptors in vitro, the blockade of
putative
1L-sites, and selective effects on
lower urinary tract function versus blood pressure in vivo suggest the
potential utility of this compound for the treatment of BPH.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank James P. Sullivan for helpful insights, John C. Cain for technical assistance, and Earl Gubbins and Robert Simmer for molecular biological support. The contributions of David G. Witte are also gratefully acknowledged.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 19, 2001.
Received for publication July 24, 2001.
1
In this article, nomenclature used to
differentiate among the subtypes of
1-adrenoceptors uses uppercase subscripted
letters to describe tissue-sourced receptors and lowercase subscripts to define cloned receptors (Bylund et al., 1994
).
Portions of these data were presented at the American
Urological Association 2000 Meeting [Hancock A, Meyer M, Brune M,
Buckner S, Esbenshade T, Drizin I, Sullivan J, Williams M, and Kerwin J
(2000) Fidoxosin: An
1a/d receptor antagonist with
enhanced in vivo urolselectivity relative to terazosin and tamsulosin. J Urol 163 (Suppl 4):310].
Address correspondence to: Dr. Arthur A. Hancock, Department 4MN, AP9A/3, Neurological and Urological Diseases Research, Pharmaceutical Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Rd., Abbott Park, IL 60064-6125. E-mail: art.a.hancock{at}abbott.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; REC 15/2739, (N-[3-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]propyl]-3-methyl-4-oxo-2-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-8-carboxamide); Ro-70-0004, 3-(3-{4-[fluoro-2-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-phenyl]-piperazin-1-yl}-propyl)-5-methyl-1H-pyrimidine-2,4-dione mono hydrochloride monohydrate; fiduxosin (ABT-980), (3-[4-((3aR,9bR)-cis-9-methoxy-1,2,3,3a,4,9b-hexahydro-[1]-benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrol-2-yl)butyl]-8-phenyl-pyrazino[2',3':4,5]thieno [3,2-d]pyrimidine-2,4 (1H,3H)-dione hydrochloride); DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PE, phenylephrine; IUP, intraurethral pressure; EPI, epinephrine; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats; MAP, mean arterial blood pressure; AUC, area under the curve; pED50, negative logarithm of the molar dose of compound required to elicit a reduction in blood pressure for 60 min to a point midway between hypertensive and normotensive; ANOVA, analysis of variance; Ki, inhibition constant as a measure of drug affinity for a receptor, equivalent to the concentration of compound required to occupy 50% of receptors; pKB, negative logarithm of the dissociation constant; pA2, negative logarithm of the concentration of compound required to elicit a 2-fold shift of an agonist concentration-response curve in isolated tissues; A-131701, (3-[2-((3aR,9bR)-cis-6-methoxy-2,3,3a,4,5,9b, hexahydro-[1H]-benz[e]isoindol-2-yl)ethyl]pyrido[3',4':4,5]thieno [3,2-d]pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione); CL, confidence limit; B8805-033, [(±)-1,3,5-trimethyl-6-[[3-[4-((2,3dihydro-2-hydroxymethyl)-1,4-benzodioxin-5-yl)-1-piperazinyl]pro-pyl]amino]-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidin-one]; WB-4101, [2-(2,5-dimethyoxyphenoxyethyl)-aminomethyl-1,4 benzodioxane; BMY-7378, (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4,5]decane-1-7,9-dione); RWJ-38063, [N-(2-{4-[2-(methylethoxy)phenyl]piperazinyl}ethyl-2-(2-oxopiperadinyl)acetamide]; RWJ-69736, [N-(3-{4-[2-(methylethoxy)phenyl]piperazinyl}propyl-2-(2-oxopiperadinyl)acetamide].
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergic agonist induced increases in canine intraurethral pressure in vivo.
Drug Dev Res
34:
267-275[CrossRef].
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptors on intraurethral and arterial pressure responses in conscious dogs.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
300:
487-494
1b-adrenergic receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
11589-11594
1A- vs.
1B- and
1D-adrenoceptors.
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol
353:
649-662[CrossRef].
,
-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethanamine hydrochloride), a selective
1A-adrenoceptor antagonist, displays low affinity for functional
1-adrenoceptors in human prostate: implications for adrenoceptor classification.
Mol Pharmacol
49:
209-215[Abstract].
1-adrenoceptors in isolated anococcygeus muscle of rat.
Br J Pharmacol
109 (Suppl):
112P.
1 adrenergic receptor (AR) subtype gene expression during bladder outlet obstruction of rats.
J Urol
163 (Suppl):
228.
1-Adrenoceptor subtypes: a synopsis of their pharmacology and molecular biology.
Drug Dev Res
39:
54-107.
1A- compared to
1B-adrenoceptors on intraurethral and blood pressure responses in conscious dogs and a pharmacodynamic assessment of in vivo prostatic selectivity.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
285:
628-642
1-adrenoceptor antagonist selective for
1A- and
1D- compared to
1B-adrenoceptors.
Drug Dev Res
44:
140-162[CrossRef].
-adrenoceptors are of the atypical
1L-receptor subtype.
J Urol
159:
25S.
-Blockers and lower urinary tract function: more than smooth muscle relaxation?
BJU Int
86 (Suppl 2):
23-30.
1-adrenoceptors.
Pharmacol Commun
6:
23-28.
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in the human prostate: functional and binding studies.
Br J Urol
74:
572-578[Medline].
-blocker therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Urology
41:
38-45.
1a-adrenergic receptor subtype-selective antagonists.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
294:
224-229
1-Adrenergic receptors in the lower urinary tract and vascular bed: potential role for the
1d subtype in filling symptoms and effects of ageing on vascular expression.
BJU Int
85 (Suppl 2):
6-11.
1-adrenoceptor subtype selectivity and
1-blocker-induced orthostatic hypotension.
Jpn J Pharmacol
77:
61-70[CrossRef][Medline].
1-antagonist selective for the lower urinary tract: in vitro studies.
Neurourol Urodyn
13:
473-474.
1a-adrenergic receptor antagonists based on the L-type Ca2+ channel antagonist niguldipine.
J Med Chem
38:
1579-1581[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptor pharmacology of Ro-70-0004 and RS-100329, novel
1A-adrenoceptor antagonists.
Br J Pharmacol
127:
252-258[CrossRef][Medline].
1-adrenoceptor antagonists.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
300:
495-504This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Brune, S. P. Katwala, I. Milicic, D. G. Witte, J. F. Kerwin Jr., M. D. Meyer, A. A. Hancock, and M. Williams Effect of Fiduxosin, an Antagonist Selective for alpha 1A- and alpha 1D-Adrenoceptors, on Intraurethral and Arterial Pressure Responses in Conscious Dogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2002; 300(2): 487 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Witte, M. E. Brune, S. P. Katwala, I. Milicic, D. Stolarik, Y.-H. Hui, K. C. Marsh, J. F. Kerwin Jr., M. D. Meyer, and A. A. Hancock Modeling of Relationships between Pharmacokinetics and Blockade of Agonist-Induced Elevation of Intraurethral Pressure and Mean Arterial Pressure in Conscious Dogs Treated with alpha 1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2002; 300(2): 495 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||