![]() |
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 2, 355-360, February 2002
Birth Defects Research Center, Departments of Pediatrics and Pharmacology/Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although some patterns are beginning to emerge, our knowledge of human phase I drug-metabolizing enzyme developmental expression remains far from complete. Expression has been observed as early as organogenesis, but this appears restricted to a few enzymes. At least two of the enzyme families that are expressed in the fetal liver exhibit a temporal switch in the immediate perinatal period (e.g., CYP3A7 to CYP3A4/3A5 and FMO1 to FMO3), whereas others show a progressive change in isoform expression through gestation (e.g., the class I alcohol dehydrogenases). Many of the phase I drug-metabolizing enzyme exhibit dynamic perinatal expression changes that are regulated primarily by mechanisms linked to birth and secondarily to maturity. A few of these enzymes are not detectable until well after birth, suggesting that birth is necessary but not sufficient for the onset of expression (e.g., CYP1A2). Tissue-specific expression adds to the complexity during ontogeny. For example, CYP3A7 expression is restricted to the fetal liver. However, with few exceptions, complete temporal relationship information during development is not known. Furthermore, most studies have concentrated on hepatic expression and much less is known about extrahepatic developmental events.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well recognized that
substantial changes in pharmacokinetics occur during human development.
That these changes contribute to differences in therapeutic efficacy
and toxicant susceptibility has been well documented. Metabolism is a
major determinant of pharmacokinetics. Although changes in
drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) expression during development are well
recognized, the knowledge needed to understand and predict therapeutic
dosing and avoidance of toxicity during maturation is incomplete.
Historically, DME activity has been divided into two categories, phase
I and phase II. Depending on the chemical nature of a xenobiotic, the
former is characterized by oxidative metabolism resulting in either: 1)
pharmacological inactivation or activation, 2) facilitated elimination,
and/or 3) addition of reactive groups for subsequent phase II
conjugation. This concise review is intended to summarize our current
understanding of phase I DME developmental expression in the human (see
Table 1 for overall summary) and
highlight areas needing further study. It is complemented by the
companion article on the ontogeny of phase II DME and DME regulation
during development (McCarver and Hines, 2002
).
|
Advances in this field have been hampered by several problems. Foremost
has been the ethical and logistical problems in obtaining tissue
samples of suitable quality for in vitro studies, particularly for
those examining RNA. The need for studies using human tissues became
obvious with the realization that significant species differences exist
in the DME structural genes and also in developmental control mechanisms. Furthermore, variation in human metabolic capacity, including variation during development, is well documented. Advances in
pharmacogenetics have revealed specific molecular mechanisms accounting
for interindividual variability, including both structural and
regulatory polymorphisms that vary in frequency across ethnic groups.
Regulatory polymorphisms that uniquely impact developmental expression
also are likely. Thus, direct extrapolation of developmental expression
data from animal models to the human is inappropriate without human
data to validate such models. Another problem has been the historic
lack of specific substrate and immunological probes. Because of this
deficiency, the presence or absence of one or more members of a gene
family may be inferred from past in vivo and in vitro metabolic and
immunochemical studies, but not specific enzymes. A long-standing
conundrum has been the apparent paradoxical relationship between
historical in vivo metabolic data and in vitro enzyme levels.
Weight-corrected drug clearance in pediatric patients generally is
reported as higher than adult values, despite the almost universal
observation of reduced enzyme levels in children,. This may be
partially explained by the allometric model discussed by Anderson et
al. (1997)
, but other physiological differences between these
populations also must contribute. Finally, the different stages of
ontogeny are characterized by dynamic changes in gene expression. Thus,
in vitro studies drawing conclusions based on a small number of tissue
samples, representing a narrow time window must be viewed cautiously.
| |
Ontogeny of the Cytochromes P450 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Total cytochrome P450 (EC 1.14.14.1) content in the fetal liver is
30 to 60% of adult values. At birth, increases are observed such that
total hepatic cytochrome P450 content approaches adult levels during
the first 10 years of life (Shimada et al., 1996b
). However,
significant differences in expression are observed among the three gene
families important for xenobiotic metabolism, as well as among the 24 individual enzymes encoded by these families.
CYP1 Gene Family.
The three members of the CYP1
gene family, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1, are essential for the
metabolic disposition of environmental polycyclic and halogenated
aromatic hydrocarbon, aromatic amines, estradiol, and several
therapeutics (Parkinson, 1996
). Evidence for the presence of
constitutively expressed CYP1A1 enzyme in the fetus is compelling. In
1987, Pasanen et al. (1987)
reported ethoxyresorufin
O-deethylase (EROD) activity in seven fetal liver samples
(unreported gestational age) that was inhibited to a variable extent by
an anti-rat CYP1A1 monoclonal antibody. Similarly, Yang et al. (1995)
demonstrated EROD activity (6.2 pmol/min/mg of microsomal protein) in 8 to 10 pooled embryonic liver samples at 7 to 9 weeks estimated
gestational age. In the latter case, activity was inhibited by both a
polyclonal rabbit anti-rat CYP1A1 antibody and 7,8-benzoflavone. CYP1A1 mRNA also was detectable by RT-PCR, providing convincing evidence for enzyme expression as early as liver organogenesis. Immunological evidence (Murray et al., 1992
; Shimada et al., 1996b
), as
well as the expression of EROD activity (7.3 ± 5.5 pmol/min/mg of
microsomal protein) and the metabolic activation of
benzo[a]pyrene 7,8-diol and aflatoxin B1 (Shimada et al.,
1996b
) also provided strong evidence for CYP1A1 expression later in
development, i.e., 11 to 20 weeks of gestation. These data are
consistent with the report by Omiecinski et al. (1990)
in which CYP1A1
mRNA was detectable in fetal liver, lung, and adrenal, but not kidney
tissue between 6 and 12 weeks, 8 and 21 weeks, and 11 and 17 weeks
gestational age, respectively. In each case, CYP1A1 mRNA expression
declined with increasing age. In contrast, constitutive CYP1A1
expression is not generally detectable in adult tissues. Thus, the
suppression of this activity must occur sometime late in prenatal,
perinatal, or early childhood development.
CYP2 Gene Family.
CYP2 is the most diverse human
cytochrome P450 gene family with eighteen members. Although not
expressed at high levels in the adult liver, members of the CYP2A gene
family are found at relatively high levels in several extrahepatic
tissues, including the olfactory mucosa (Su et al., 1996
). This
observation, together with the active role of CYP2A in the metabolism
of nicotine, tobacco smoke procarcinogens, and other inhaled toxicants
(Liu et al., 1996
) has generated considerable interest. CYP2A6 and
CYP2A13, but not CYP2A7, were readily detectable using both
immunological probes and RT-PCR in seven of eight human fetal nasal
mucosa samples from individuals ranging in age from 13 to 18 weeks.
However, expression was 1 to 5% of adult levels. Furthermore, although the sample size was small, expression tended to be higher in the older
samples, i.e., 15 to 18 weeks (Gu et al., 2000
). Based on this trend
and the observed high expression levels in adult nasal mucosa, one
would speculate that CYP2A6/2A13 expression would continue to increase
in the third trimester. However, such a time course has not been
determined. None of the CYP2A enzymes appear to be expressed in fetal
liver (Mäenpää et al., 1993
; Hakkola et al., 1994
;
Shimada et al., 1996b
; Gu et al., 2000
). Yet, data from Tateishi et al.
(1997)
demonstrated expression of hepatic CYP2A6 at or near adult
levels by 1 year of age. Additional studies clearly are needed to
clarify the CYP2A hepatic and extrahepatic developmental expression pattern.
CYP3 Gene Family.
The CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 gene products account
for 30 to 40% of the total cytochrome P450 in the adult liver and
small intestine where they participate in the metabolic disposition of
a wide variety of therapeutics and toxicants. Large interindividual
variability in CYP3A expression is observed that may be partially
explained by regulation through PXR and CAR, and partially by genetic
variability (Kuehl et al., 2001
). Early studies by Wrighton et al.
(1988)
identified CYP3A7 as a member of the CYP3A subfamily
uniquely expressed in fetal liver. Subsequent studies demonstrated the differential expression of this enzyme in the fetus with a switch to
CYP3A4/3A5 in the adult (Schuetz et al., 1994
; Yang et al., 1994
).
Fetal hepatic CYP3A7 is detectable as early as 50 to 60 days gestation
with continued significant levels of expression through the perinatal
period (Lacroix et al., 1997
). Expression begins to decline after the
first postnatal week, reaching nondetectable levels in most individuals
by 1 year of age. Hepatic CYP3A4/3A5 expression begins to dramatically
increase at about 1 week of age, reaching 30% of adult levels by 1 month (Lacroix et al., 1997
). Because of the simultaneous decline in
CYP3A7 and increase in CYP3A4/3A5, total CYP3A protein expression over
the entire developmental period remains constant (Lacroix et al.,
1997
). However, because CYP3A7 and CYP3A4 do exhibit differences in
substrate specificity and catalytic efficacy (Shimada et al., 1996b
;
Ohmori et al., 1998
), observed differences in metabolic capacity during development are not surprising (e.g., Lacroix et al., 1997
). Finally, given the abundance and importance of CYP3A4/3A5 in the adult intestine
and the apparent absence of CYP3A7 in fetal extrahepatic tissues (Yang
et al., 1994
), it would be of considerable interest to examine the
developmental expression of CYP3A4/3A5 in the gastrointestinal tract.
| |
Ontogeny of the Flavin-Containing Monooxygenases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMO) (EC 1.14.13.8), encoded
by a six-member gene family (FMO1-6), are important for the
NADPH-dependent oxidative metabolism of a wide variety of xenobiotics
containing nucleophilic nitrogen-, sulfur-, selenium-, and
phosphorous-heteroatoms. The ontogeny of human hepatic FMO exhibits a
switch reminiscent of that observed for the CYP3A subfamily. In two
fetal samples of unknown age, Dolphin et al. (1996)
demonstrated hepatic FMO1 but not FMO3 mRNA expression. In contrast, FMO3 but not
FMO1 transcripts were demonstrated in four adult liver samples. Yeung
et al. (2000)
observed FMO1 expression at 14.4 ± 3.5 pmol/mg microsomal protein in five fetal liver samples from 14 to 17 weeks gestational age whereas FMO3 immunoreactive protein was nondetectable. In adult tissues, hepatic FMO1 was nondetectable whereas expression was
readily detectable in the small intestine (2.9 ± 1.9 pmol/mg microsomal protein) and kidney (47.0 ± 9.0 pmol/mg microsomal protein). A more complete picture of human hepatic FMO developmental expression has recently been completed by our own group (Koukouritaki et al., 2002
). In 240 liver samples ranging in age from 8 weeks gestation to 18 postnatal years, the highest level of FMO1 expression was observed at 8 to 15 weeks gestation (7.8 ± 5.8 pmol/mg
microsomal protein). FMO1 expression subsequently declined during fetal
development and was completely suppressed within 3 postnatal days by a
mechanism coupled to birth, but not gestational age. FMO3 expression
was observed at low levels between 8 and 15 weeks gestation, but not in
subsequent time periods of fetal development. The onset of FMO3
postnatal expression was highly variable. Most individuals failed to
express FMO3 in the neonatal period, but expression was detectable by 1 to 2 years of age. Intermediate FMO3 expression was observed until 11 years of age (12.7 ± 8.0 pmol/mg microsomal protein), at which
time, a gender-independent increase was observed from 11 to 18 years of
age (26.9 ± 8.6 pmol/mg microsomal protein). Although
similarities between the CYP3A and FMO temporal switches are apparent,
a fundamental difference is observed during the neonatal period.
Because the decline in CYP3A7 expression is accompanied by a
simultaneous increase in CYP3A4/3A5, net CYP3A expression remains
relatively constant. In contrast, the rapid suppression of FMO1 within
72 postnatal hours and the delayed onset of FMO3 expression results in
a null hepatic FMO phenotype in the neonate. The developmental
expression of FMO in extrahepatic tissues remains unknown.
| |
Ontogeny of the Alcohol Dehydrogenases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to the studies on the cytochromes P450 and FMO, few
studies have appeared on the developmental expression of other phase I
DME. An exception is alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) (EC 1.1.1.1). The
seminal and pioneering work of Smith et al. (1971)
provided definitive
evidence for the progressive expression of the three class 1 enzymes,
ADH1A (ADH
), ADH1B (ADH
), and ADH1C (ADH
), during development.
These investigators examined the expression of ADH in liver, lung,
kidney, and intestine from 222 individuals ranging in age from 9 weeks
gestation to greater than 20 years postnatal age. In fetal liver
samples with a mean gestational age of 11 weeks, only the ADH1A enzyme
was detectable. By 17 weeks, both ADH1A and ADH1B were measurable,
although ADH1A predominated. By 19 weeks, products from all three loci
were observed, with ADH1A greater than ADH1B and ADH1B greater than
ADH1C. At 30 weeks, ADH1A and ADH1B levels were equivalent but still
greater than ADH1C, however, by 36 weeks, ADH1B expression dominated.
In the adult, hepatic ADH1A expression was nondetectable, whereas
expression from the ADH1B and ADH1C loci were
equivalent. Interestingly, this progressive change in expression was
tissue-specific. In lung, there were no observed differences between
the fetal and adult samples and only ADH1C was detectable. ADH
expression in the intestine and kidney was low and did not change
appreciably with age. These results are largely in agreement with a
more recent study in which steady-state concentrations of the different
ADH class transcripts were measured by Northern blot analysis (Estonius et al., 1996
). In two different fetal liver samples of unknown age,
ADH1A, ADH1B, and ADH1C transcripts were observed in one, whereas ADH1B
and ADH1C transcripts dominated in the second. Differing from the
earlier report by Smith et al. (1971)
, ADH1A transcripts dominated in
the lung, whereas in the fetal kidney, only transcripts for either or
both ADH1B and ADH1C were present. Class I ADH transcripts were present
in most adult tissues with the exception of brain, kidney, and
placenta. Of the other ADH enzymes, ADH2 (class II, ADH
) and ADH5
(class V, ADH
) transcripts were observed only in fetal liver at a
concentration similar to that seen in the adult. Faint signals also
were observed in the adult small intestine and pancreas. Similar to the
class I transcripts, ADH3 (class III, ADH
) transcripts were widely
distributed, being detectable at approximately the same concentration
in all fetal and adult tissues examined with the possible exception of
the brain. In this tissue, the ADH3 transcripts appeared higher in the
fetal than in the adult brain, although the signal was readily
detectable in both tissues. Given that the ADH1 enzymes are the most
efficient ethanol-metabolizing ADH, their absence in placenta and fetal brain would contradict a substantial role for this enzyme family in
local ethanol developmental central nervous system toxicity.
| |
Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most reports on the developmental expression of the phase I DME have limited their studies to short time frames of development, and many have depended on a small number of tissue samples. Furthermore, previous research generally focused on hepatic expression during fetal development and in the postnatal time period. Yet, expression in other tissues is important. There also is a paucity of information regarding changes during early childhood or at puberty, which may account for some of the observed differences between the fetus and adult. Continued efforts using in vitro studies as described herein, complemented by data from pediatric clinical trials utilizing enzyme-selective therapeutic agents will hopefully begin to address this knowledge gap. However, even with the amount of information available, it is apparent that the temporal, tissue-specific, and interindividual variation in phase I DME expression will have a profound impact on xenobiotic biotransformation and disease susceptibility.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 31, 2001.
Received for publication August 21, 2001.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ronald N. Hines, Birth Defects Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee WI 53226-4801. E-mail: rhines{at}mcw.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
DME, drug-metabolizing enzyme; EROD, ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-coupled polymerase chain reaction amplification; Ah, aryl hydrocarbon; CAR, constitutive androstendione receptor; PXR, pregnane X receptor; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; CYP, cytochrome P450; FMO, flavin-containing monooxygenase.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. S. Anand, B. J. Anderson, N. H. G. Holford, R. W. Hall, T. Young, B. Shephard, N. S. Desai, B. A. Barton, and for the NEOPAIN Trial Investigators Group Morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in preterm and term neonates: secondary results from the NEOPAIN trial Br. J. Anaesth., August 29, 2008; (2008) aen248v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Spector, A. J. Hooten, and J. A. Ross Ontogeny of Gene Expression: A Changing Environment for Malignancy Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1021 - 1023. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Allegaert, J. N. van den Anker, J. N. de Hoon, R. H. N. van Schaik, A. Debeer, D. Tibboel, G. Naulaers, and B. J. Anderson Covariates of tramadol disposition in the first months of life Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 525 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Felmlee, H.-K. Lon, F. J. Gonzalez, and A.-M. Yu Cytochrome P450 Expression and Regulation in CYP3A4/CYP2D6 Double Transgenic Humanized Mice Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 435 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duret, S. Gerbal-Chaloin, J. Ramos, J.-M. Fabre, E. Jacquet, F. Navarro, P. Blanc, A. Sa-Cunha, P. Maurel, and M. Daujat-Chavanieu Isolation, Characterization, and Differentiation to Hepatocyte-Like Cells of Nonparenchymal Epithelial Cells from Adult Human Liver Stem Cells, July 1, 2007; 25(7): 1779 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shao, P. L. Stapleton, Y. S. Lin, and E. P. Gallagher Cytochrome P450 and Glutathione S-Transferase mRNA Expression in Human Fetal Liver Hematopoietic Stem Cells Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 168 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Warrier, W. Du, G. Natarajan, V. Salari, and J. Aranda Patterns of drug utilization in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 46(4): 449 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Anand, K.-B. Kim, S. Padilla, S. Muralidhara, H. J. Kim, J. W. Fisher, and J. V. Bruckner ONTOGENY OF HEPATIC AND PLASMA METABOLISM OF DELTAMETHRIN IN VITRO: ROLE IN AGE-DEPENDENT ACUTE NEUROTOXICITY Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 389 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cheung, A.-M. Yu, C.-S. Chen, K. W. Krausz, L. G. Byrd, L. Feigenbaum, R. J. Edwards, D. J. Waxman, and F. J. Gonzalez Growth Hormone Determines Sexual Dimorphism of Hepatic Cytochrome P450 3A4 Expression in Transgenic Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1328 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Giacoia, D. L. Birenbaum, H. C. Sachs, and D. R. Mattison The newborn drug development initiative. Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3 Pt 2): S1 - S8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoon, M. C. Madden, and H. A. Barton Developmental Expression of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Rat: a Comparison of Liver and Lung Development Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2006; 89(2): 386 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-X. Xu, Y.-H. Chen, J.-P. Wang, M.-F. Sun, H. Wang, L.-Z. Wei, and W. Wei Perinatal Lipopolysaccharide Exposure Downregulates Pregnane X Receptor and Cyp3a11 Expression in Fetal Mouse Liver Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2005; 87(1): 38 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Allegaert, B. J. Anderson, R. Verbesselt, A. Debeer, J. de Hoon, H. Devlieger, J. N. Van Den Anker, and D. Tibboel Tramadol disposition in the very young: an attempt to assess in vivo cytochrome P-450 2D6 activity Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 231 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Yu, K. Fukamachi, K. W. Krausz, C. Cheung, and F. J. Gonzalez Potential Role for Human Cytochrome P450 3A4 in Estradiol Homeostasis Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 2911 - 2919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Virkel, A. Lifschitz, J. Sallovitz, A. Pis, and C. Lanusse COMPARATIVE HEPATIC AND EXTRAHEPATIC ENANTIOSELECTIVE SULFOXIDATION OF ALBENDAZOLE AND FENBENDAZOLE IN SHEEP AND CATTLE Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2004; 32(5): 536 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Azorin, M. Portoles, P. Marin, F. Lazaro-Dieguez, L. Megias, G. Egea, and J. Renau-Piqueras PRENATAL ETHANOL EXPOSURE ALTERS THE CYTOSKELETON AND INDUCES GLYCOPROTEIN MICROHETEROGENEITY IN RAT NEWBORN HEPATOCYTES Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2004; 39(3): 203 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. McCarver Applicability of the Principles of Developmental Pharmacology to the Study of Environmental Toxicants Pediatrics, April 1, 2004; 113(4/S1): 969 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ginsberg, D. Hattis, R. Miller, and B. Sonawane Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Data: Implications for Environmental Risk Assessment for Children Pediatrics, April 1, 2004; 113(4/S1): 973 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Costa, L. Steardo, and V. Cuomo Structural Effects and Neurofunctional Sequelae of Developmental Exposure to Psychotherapeutic Drugs: Experimental and Clinical Aspects Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 56(1): 103 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Koukouritaki, J. R. Manro, S. A. Marsh, J. C. Stevens, A. E. Rettie, D. G. McCarver, and R. N. Hines Developmental Expression of Human Hepatic CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 965 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|