![]() |
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 1, 83-90, January 2002
1B- and
1D-Adrenergic Receptors
Exhibit Different Requirements for Agonist and Mitogen-Activated
Protein Kinase Activation to Regulate Growth Responses in Rat 1 Fibroblasts
Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences (B.A.W., D.M., G.R.P.), College of Pharmacy, and Department of Pharmacology (M.T.P.), College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We compared DNA replication, protein biosynthesis, and
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity in Rat 1 fibroblasts stably expressing either the
1B-adrenergic receptor (AR)
or
1D-AR subtypes. Activation of both the
1B-AR and
1D-AR inhibited DNA synthesis
(as assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation). In
contrast, both receptors stimulated protein biosynthesis (as measured
by [35S]methionine incorporation) and activated
extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2. Importantly, these
responses were agonist-dependent for the
1B-AR, but were
agonist-independent for the
1D-AR. Agonist activation of
the
1B-AR resulted in increased p38 kinase activity, but
not c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) activity, whereas the
1D-AR activated JNK but not p38 kinase. Unlike ERK1/2,
JNK activity was increased by agonist treatment in the
1D-AR cells. An ERK1/2-pathway inhibitor PD98059 had no
effect on phenylephrine-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in
either cell line but blocked protein biosynthesis mediated by both
receptors. The p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 blocked
1B-AR effects on [3H]thymidine and
[35S]methionine incorporation in
1B-AR-expressing cells, but had no effect on
1D-AR-mediated growth responses, consistent with the
inability of the
1D-AR to activate p38 kinase.
Therefore,
1B- and
1D-ARs mediated
similar growth responses but differ with respect to the MAPK family
member involved and the requirement for agonist.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three
genes encoding unique
1-AR subtypes,
1A-,
1B-, or
1D-AR, have been cloned and pharmacologically
characterized (Cotecchia et al., 1988
; Schwinn et al., 1990
; Lomasney
et al., 1991
; Perez et al., 1991
; Hieble et al., 1995
). All three
1-AR subtypes exhibit similar affinity for
endogenous catecholamines (Schwinn et al., 1990
; Lomasney et al., 1991
;
Perez et al., 1991
); however, the cellular functions of these receptors
have not been adequately defined. Our previous work showed that
although all receptor subtypes are expressed in peripheral arteries,
the
1A-AR or
1D-AR
couple agonist binding to smooth muscle contraction in a given vessel (Guarino et al., 1996
; Hrometz et al., 1999
; Piascik and Perez, 2001
).
In addition to the acute regulation of blood pressure, catecholamines
induce vascular smooth muscle cell growth (Johnson et al., 1983
;
deBlois et al., 1996
; Fingerle et al., 1991
; van Kleef et al., 1992
;
Chen et al., 1995
). These observations suggest that expressed
1-AR subtypes may differentially activate
signaling pathways and physiological responses.
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are important mediators of
cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. There are
three major MAPK subtypes: the extracellular signal-regulated kinases
(ERK1/2), c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs), and
p38 kinases (Widmann et al., 1999
). Activated MAPKs translocate to the
nucleus and phosphorylate multiple transcription factors to increase
transcriptional activity (Widmann et al., 1999
). ERK1/2 and p38 kinase
also phosphorylate cytoplasmic substrates, including those involved in
protein biosynthesis (Widmann et al., 1999
). Recent studies suggest
that
1-AR subtypes differentially activate
MAPK family members and that the profile of MAPK activation uniquely
impacts on cellular phenotype (Alexandrov et al., 1999
; Zhong and
Minneman, 1999
; Keffel et al., 2000
). For example, in PC12 cells,
inducible expression and activation of the
1A-AR, but not the
1B-AR or the
1D-AR
subtypes, leads to activation of ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 kinase and
promotes neurite outgrowth (Zhong and Minneman, 1999
).
Discernment of the role of
1-AR subtypes
in long-term growth responses in tissues that express multiple receptor
subtypes is hindered by the lack of
1-AR
subtype-selective agonists. An added complexity in studying the
specific role of
1-AR subtypes in long-term
responses is the observation that endogenous
1-ARs are differentially regulated by chronic
agonist exposure in myocardial and vascular smooth muscle cells (Chen
et al., 1995
; Rokosh et al., 1996
). As an alternative approach to study
the regulatory roles of
1-ARs, several
laboratories have compared signaling properties of
1-AR receptor subtypes in heterologous
expression systems. These studies have demonstrated intrinsic
differences between the
1-AR subtypes within a
cell line and cellular responses for a given
1-AR expressed in different host cell lines.
Endogenously expressed
1A-ARs mediate
hypertrophic growth of myocardial cells (Varma and Deng, 2000
).
Furthermore, accumulating evidence suggests that
1A-ARs, and to a lesser extent
1D-ARs, regulate arterial blood pressure
(Piascik and Perez, 2001
). The functional roles of the
1B-AR and
1D-AR in
cardiovascular tissues are not well understood. We previously reported
divergent regulation of subcellular localization and acute signaling
events by
1B-AR and
1D-AR expressed in Rat 1 fibroblasts (McCune
et al., 2000
). The
1B-AR exhibits properties
of a typical G protein-coupled receptor because it is expressed
primarily on the cell surface and demonstrates agonist-dependent
internalization and ERK1/2 activation (McCune et al., 2000
). In
contrast, the
1D-AR localizes primarily in
internalized subcellular compartments and shows evidence of enhanced
ERK1/2 and phospholipase activity in the absence of agonist (McCune et
al., 2000
). In this report, we examined JNK and p38 kinase
activation, cellular proliferation, and protein biosynthesis mediated
by these receptor subtypes. Both receptors inhibited DNA synthesis and
increased protein biosynthesis and ERK1/2 activity. Interestingly,
ERK1/2 and protein biosynthesis were agonist-dependent for
1B-AR and agonist-independent for the
1D-AR, suggesting constitutive ERK1/2 activity
was coupled to protein biosynthesis. We also demonstrated divergent
regulation of JNK and p38 kinase by these receptor subtypes. For
example, the
1B-AR activated p38 kinase but
not JNK, whereas the
1D-AR was coupled to JNK
but not p38 kinase activation. Finally, we show that the
1B-AR, but not
1D-AR,
mediated growth effects through a p38 kinase-dependent pathway.
Therefore, although the
1B-AR and
1D-AR mediate similar effects on growth
responses, they exhibit different requirements for agonist activation
and MAPK isoforms.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture.
Rat 1 fibroblasts stably transfected with
either the cloned human
1B- or
1D-AR (GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge,
Middlesex, UK) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 1%
penicillin-streptomycin mixture (Invitrogen), and Geneticin (250 µg/ml; Invitrogen) at 37°C in 5% CO2.
Twenty-four hours after plating, cells were washed and then
serum-deprived for 48 h before the addition of drugs.
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation. Rat 1 fibroblasts plated on 24-well dishes at 1 × 104 cells/well were treated with the indicated drugs for 24 h with 1 µCi [3H]thymidine (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) included during the last 6 h of incubation. Kinase inhibitors were added 20 min before phenylephrine (PE). Cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed for 10 min with ice-cold methanol, washed 3 × 5 min with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid, and dissolved in 1 N sodium hydroxide. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was quantified using liquid scintillation counting and used as an index of DNA synthesis.
[35S]Methionine Incorporation.
Incorporation
of [35S]methionine in Rat 1 fibroblasts was
performed as described by Xin et al. (1997)
with modifications (Xin et
al., 1997
). Serum-deprived Rat 1 fibroblasts plated on 24-well dishes
at 1 × 104 cells/well were washed twice
with methionine-free DMEM and incubated for 30 min. Cells were then
treated with the indicated drugs in low-methionine (2 mg/l) DMEM for
24 h. Kinase inhibitors were added 20 min before PE.
[35S]Methionine (1 µCi; PerkinElmer Life
Sciences) was added during the last 6 h of incubation. Sample
processing was essentially the same as for thymidine incorporation
assay. [35S]Methionine incorporation was
quantified using liquid scintillation counting and served as an index
of protein synthesis.
Preparation of GST-c-Jun(1-135).
Recombinant c-Jun
[c-Jun(1-135)] was produced in Escherichia coli as a
glutathione S-transferase fusion protein expressed from
plasmid pGEX-c-Jun (Prasad et al., 1995
). GST-c-Jun(1-135) fusion
protein was purified by conjugation to glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden) and eluted with
20 mM glutathione in 100 mM Tris, pH 8. The eluate was dialyzed for
2 h at 4°C to remove glutathione.
ERK1/2 Activity Assay.
ERK1/2 activity was detected by the
in-gel method as described previously (McCune et al., 2000
). Cells were
treated with the indicated drugs, washed with ice-cold PBS, and scraped
into 1 ml of 250 mM ice-cold buffered sucrose. Cell pellets were
resuspended in cold lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 250 mM NaCl,
2.5 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 100 µM Na3VO4, and
protease inhibitors (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA)] for 30 min,
centrifuged (15 min; 15,000g; 4°C), and the supernatant collected. Protein was resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 0.5 mg/ml myelin basic protein (MBP). After electrophoresis, the gels were washed with 20% 2-propanol in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, and
then with 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol in HEPES buffer. Proteins were
denatured in 6 M urea and gradually renatured in HEPES buffer containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 and 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol
(renaturation buffer) at 4°C. After overnight incubation in
renaturation buffer at 4°C, gels were preincubated in 25 ml of cold
kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 mM
-glycerophosphate, 100 µM
Na3VO4, pH 7.6) for 30 min.
Phosphorylation of MBP was performed in situ by soaking the gel in 25 ml of kinase buffer containing 20 µM ATP and 150 to 160 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA)
for 90 to 120 min at 30°C. After extensive washing with 5%
trichloroacetic acid/1% sodium pyrophosphate the gels were dried and
exposed to film. 32P incorporation into MBP was
determined by densitometric analysis.
JNK Activity Assay. Activities of the 46- and 55-kDa isoforms of JNK were determined by in-gel activity assays essentially as described for ERK1/2, except 0.1 mg/ml GST-c-Jun(1-135) was used as substrate.
p38 Kinase Immunoblotting. Cells were maintained in serum-free media or treated with PE (100 µM) or anisomyosin (50 ng/ml) for 15 min. Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed with 150 µl of SDS-sample buffer. The lysates were sonicated (5 × 2 s), boiled for 5 min, and cooled on ice. Equal volumes of lysate were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Phosphorylated and total p38 kinase was detected by protein immunoblotting with a 1:1000 dilution of rabbit polyclonal phosphospecific (Thr180/Tyr192) or total p38 kinase antibodies (New England Biolabs). Primary antibody was detected with 1:2000 horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB). Bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL+; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB) and quantitated by phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Data Analysis. Differences among treatment groups were detected by one- or two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures followed by Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. In the absence of a significant treatment by treatment group interaction, the statistical significance of the main or overall effect of a particular treatment is reported. Differences between the cell lines were detected by unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test. All calculations were performed using the Statistica program (release 5.1; StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). A p < 0.05 was considered significant. Nonlinear regression analyses of concentration-response curves were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 2.01; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Agonist Activation of
1B- and
1D-AR
Inhibits DNA Synthesis.
The studies presented here extend our
previous report demonstrating differences in the regulatory properties
of the
1B- and
1D-AR
(McCune et al., 2000
). To determine the role of
1B-AR and
1D-ARs in
cellular proliferation, we examined PE-mediated [3H]thymidine incorporation in Rat 1 fibroblasts stably expressing these receptor subtypes. Cells treated
for 24 h with various concentrations of the
1-AR agonist PE exhibited a
concentration-dependent decrease in
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig.
1). Maximal percentage of inhibition was
not different for the two cell lines (
1B,
40 ± 11%;
1D-AR, 19 ± 7%; N.S.).
The observed decrease in [3H]thymidine
incorporation after prolonged PE treatment was not associated with a
loss of cell number or decreased cell viability (data not shown).
Levels of [3H]thymidine incorporation were
similar in the absence of agonist [
1B,
8.6 ± 3.2 cpm (× 103);
1D, 11.0 ± 2.7 cpm (× 103); N.S.] and nonlinear regression revealed
similar
log IC50 values for both cell lines
(
1B, 6.6 ± 0.3;
1D, 7.0 ± 0.2; N.S.).
|
Inhibition of [3H]Thymidine Incorporation Mediated by
1B- and
1D-AR Is Reversed by
Prazosin.
To determine whether the effects of PE in
1B- and
1D-AR-expressing cells were mediated through
1-ARs, we examined the effect of various
adrenoceptor antagonists on PE-mediated inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Table
1). PE (1 µM) reduced DNA synthesis to
44 ± 2% of that observed in unstimulated
1B-AR cells and 17 ± 4% for the
1D-AR. The effect of PE on DNA synthesis was
blocked by 1 µM prazosin (nonselective
1-AR
antagonist) in both cell lines and not affected by either 1 µM
yohimbine (
2-AR antagonist) or 1 µM
propranolol (
-AR antagonist), suggesting that agonist-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis was mediated through the expressed
1-AR.
|
Coupling of
1B- and
1D-ARs to Protein
Biosynthesis.
Because
1-ARs are known to
regulate both proliferative and hypertrophic growth responses, we also
examined [35S]methionine incorporation as an
index of protein biosynthesis. Levels of basal
[35S]methionine incorporation were greater in
the
1D-AR compared with the
1B-AR [7.8 ± 1.0 cpm (× 103) for the
1B-AR and
30.8 ± 3.4 cpm (× 103) for the
1D-AR (p < 0.001)]. PE
increased [35S]methionine incorporation in a
concentration-dependent manner in
1B- and
1D-AR-expressing fibroblasts (Fig.
2), with a greater maximal effect of PE
in the
1B cell line (238 ± 16 versus
162 ± 29%; p < 0.05). Differences in agonist
and basal [35S]methionine incorporation between
the two cell lines were not due to differences in cell number (data not
shown). The
log EC50 values for two receptors
were similar for the two cell lines (
1B-AR, 7.2 ± 0.3;
1D-AR, 6.9 ± 0.5;
N.S.).
|
Coupling of
1B- and
1D-ARs to
ERK1/2.
We compared the ability of these receptor subtypes to
regulate ERK1/2 activation (Fig. 3). In
1B-AR-expressing cells, PE (100 µM; 5 min)
significantly increased ERK1/2 activity over basal levels
(*p < 0.05). In contrast, we did not detect PE- or
serum-induced increases in ERK1/2 activity for the
1D-AR. Basal ERK1/2 activity was 2-fold
greater in the
1D-AR-expressing cells
(
1B, 1.7 ± 0.8 IOD;
1D, 3.5 ± 0.9 IOD) and similar in
magnitude to the
1B cell line treated with PE
(
1B, 4.7 ± 1.8 IOD). We previously showed that 1 µM prazosin inhibited basal ERK1/2 activity by ~50% in
1D-AR-expressing cells (McCune et al.,
2000
). High basal ERK1/2 activity may have precluded our ability to
observe further increases in ERK1/2 activity induced by 10% fetal
bovine serum or PE.
|
Coupling of
1B- and
1D-ARs to
JNK.
We examined the ability of PE and anisomyosin (positive
control) to activate JNK in
1B-AR- and
1D-AR-expressing fibroblasts (Fig.
4). Although anisomyosin (50 ng/ml)
stimulated JNK activity to a similar extent in both cell lines, PE (100 µM; 20 min) increased JNK activity only in
1D-AR fibroblasts (*p < 0.01). Basal JNK activity was similar in both
1B-AR- and
1D-AR-expressing fibroblasts (average basal
activity of
1B relative to
1D was 75 ± 30%; n = 4;
N.S.).
|
Coupling of
1B- and
1D-ARs to p38
Kinase.
We compared the ability of PE to activate p38 kinase in
both cell lines by immunoblotting for phospho- and total p38 kinase in
unstimulated, PE-, or anisomyosin-treated cell lines (Fig. 5). PE (100 µM; 15 min) induced p38
kinase activity in
1B-AR, but not in
1D-AR-expressing fibroblasts
(*p < 0.05).
|
PD98059 Blocks PE-Induced ERK1/2 Activation in
1B-AR
Cells and Decreases Basal ERK1/2 Activity in
1D-AR
Cells.
Activation of MAPK family members requires phosphorylation
on both threonine and tyrosine by dual specificity kinases (Widmann et
al., 1999
). To assess the role of ERK1/2 and p38 kinase in
1-AR-mediated DNA and protein biosynthesis we
used selective cell-permeable inhibitors of these MAPK isoforms. Rat 1 fibroblasts were pretreated for 20 min with DMSO (0.1% v/v; control),
10 µM PD98059, a selective inhibitor of ERK1/2 activation (Dudley et al., 1995
), or the p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580. After 5 min of PE or
10% FBS (control for ERK1/2 activation) treatment, cell lysates were
prepared and ERK1/2 activity was determined using in-gel kinase assays.
As shown in Fig. 6, PE-induced ERK1/2
activation in
1B-AR-expressing cells was
blocked by PD98059. Unlike a previous report demonstrating inhibition
of ERK1/2 activity by p38 kinase in Rat 1 fibroblasts (Alexandrov et
al., 1999
), we did not detect differences in either basal or
agonist-induced ERK1/2 activity in the presence of
SB203580. Relative to the
1B-AR,
1D-AR-expressing cells displayed
elevated ERK1/2 activity in the absence of agonist that was inhibited
by PD98059.
|
SB203580 Blocks PE-Induced p38 Kinase Activation in
1B-AR Cells.
To demonstrate the inhibitory effect
of p38 kinase inhibitor SB203850 on
1-AR-mediated responses, cells were
preincubated for 20 min with DMSO (0.1% v/v) or 10 µM SB203580
before the addition of PE (100 µM; 20 min). Cells were harvested and
equal volumes of cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted for phospho- or total p38 kinase (Fig.
7). In
1B-AR
cells, PE-mediated increases in phospho-38 kinase were blocked by
SB203580. In contrast, PE did not activate p38 kinase in the
1D-AR cell line.
|
Role of ERK1/2 in
1-AR-Mediated DNA and Protein
Biosynthesis.
Both
1B-AR and
1D-ARs inhibited DNA synthesis in Rat 1 fibroblasts (Fig. 1). Cell cycle arrest in HepG2 cells overexpressing
1B-AR occurs through an ERK1/2-dependent
pathway (Auer et al., 1998
). To investigate the role of ERK1/2 in
1-AR-mediated alterations in DNA synthesis, we
examined [3H]thymidine incorporation in the
absence and presence of 10 µM PD98059. Although PD98059 blocked
ERK1/2 activation in both cell lines (Fig. 6), PD98059 did not reverse
PE-mediated decreases in [3H]thymidine
incorporation in either cell line (Fig.
8, A and C), indicating that these
1-ARs regulate DNA synthesis through an ERK1/2-independent pathway.
|
1B-AR-expressing fibroblasts (Fig. 8B;
***p < 0.001). Agonist-mediated activation of protein
biosynthesis was inhibited ~50% by 10 µM PD98059 (Fig. 8B;
++p < 0.01 versus PE alone). PE
increased [35S]methionine incorporation in
1D-AR fibroblasts (Fig. 8D), but the observed
increase in this series of experiments did not attain statistical
significance (Fig. 2). Interestingly, basal
[35S]methionine incorporation was greater in
1D-AR-expressing cells compared with the
1B-AR-expressing cell line
[
1B, 7.8 ± 1.0 cpm (× 103);
1D, 30.8 ± 3.4 cpm (× 103); p < 0.001]
and was similar in magnitude to PE-stimulated levels in
1B-AR-expressing cells [2.1 ± 0.3 cpm
(× 103)]. Thus, any further increase in protein
biosynthesis induced by PE might be expected to be small.
Role of p38 Kinase in
1-AR-Induced DNA and Protein
Biosynthesis.
In contrast to PD98059, 10 µM SB203580 reversed
1B-AR-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis by
~50% (Fig. 9A;
++p < 0.01 compared with PE
alone), suggesting that inhibition of DNA replication occurs, in part,
through a p38 kinase-dependent pathway. Agonist-induced protein
biosynthesis in
1B-AR cells was also inhibited
~50% by SB203580 (Fig. 9B; ++p < 0.01 versus PE alone). In contrast, SB203580 had no effect on either
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 9C) or
[35S]methionine incorporation (Fig. 9D) in
1D-AR-expressing fibroblasts. The effect of
SB203580 on unstimulated DNA synthesis was not significantly different
between the two cell lines. Combined PD and SB treatment in
1B-AR cells completely blocked the effect of
PE on protein synthesis [control, 7.8 ± 0.9 cpm (× 103); PE, 20.5 ± 2.6 cpm (× 103), p < 0.001; PD + SB,
6.7 ± 0.6 cpm (× 103), N.S.; PE + PD/SB,
8.0 ± 1.0 cpm (× 103), N.S.], indicating
that the
1B-AR uses both ERK1/2 and p38 kinase
cascades to promote protein biosynthesis.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-ARs are important mediators of arterial
blood pressure, vascular smooth muscle contraction, and growth.
Multiple
1-AR subtypes are expressed in
peripheral arteries; however, whether the same
1-AR subtype regulates both contractile and
growth responses in vivo and whether this growth represents
hypertrophy, hyperplasia, or both have not been adequately defined.
Definitive assessment of
1-AR-mediated growth
responses in vivo is hindered by the lack of
1-AR subtype-selective compounds and
differential regulation of receptor expression by prolonged agonist
exposure (Chen et al., 1995
; Rokosh et al., 1996
). However, several
laboratories have shown differential coupling of
1-AR subtypes to MAPK activation (Zhong and
Minneman, 1999
; Keffel et al., 2000
; McCune et al., 2000
) and
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Keffel et al.,
2000
) in heterologous cell expression systems, suggesting that
1-AR subtypes might differentially activate
cellular growth responses.
To further examine the regulatory functions of the
1B-AR and
1D-AR, we
compared cell proliferation, protein biosynthesis, and the MAPK
isoforms mediating these growth responses in Rat 1 fibroblasts stably
expressing these receptor subtypes. Despite similar levels of receptor
expression (between 5.5 and 10 pmol/mg of protein; McCune et al., 2000
)
and the overall similarity of effect on cell proliferation and protein
biosynthesis, our results reveal differential requirements for agonist
and MAPK activation between these receptor subtypes. Agonist treatment
of
1B-AR-expressing fibroblasts induces
protein biosynthesis (Fig. 2), ERK1/2 activity (Fig. 3; McCune et
al., 2000
), and p38 kinase activity (Fig. 5), but has no
effect on JNK activity (Fig. 4) and inhibits DNA synthesis (Fig. 1). In
contrast, protein biosynthesis and ERK1/2 activity are elevated in the
absence of agonist in
1D-AR cells. Although ERK1/2 activity and protein biosynthesis are agonist-independent for
the
1D-AR, JNK activity and inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation are
agonist-dependent, suggesting that the
1D-AR
is not constitutively linked to these responses in Rat 1 fibroblasts.
The overall pattern of MAPK activation and cellular growth responses
observed in Rat 1 fibroblasts is distinct from
1-AR subtypes expressed in either CHO or PC12
cells. Similar to results obtained in PC12 cells, activation of
1B-AR in Rat 1 fibroblasts cells increases
ERK1/2 and p38 kinase activity, but does not activate JNK. However,
although
1B-AR mediates increased protein
biosynthesis and inhibition of DNA replication in Rat 1 fibroblasts,
this receptor subtype does not affect DNA replication when expressed in
CHO cells (Keffel et al., 2000
). Expression and activation of the
1D-AR stimulate DNA replication, p38 kinase,
and JNK in CHO cells (Keffel et al., 2000
) but activate only ERK1/2 in
PC12 cells (Zhong and Minneman, 1999
). In contrast, agonist activation
of the
1D-AR inhibits DNA replication (Fig.
1), activates JNK (Fig. 4), and has no effect on p38 kinase activity
(Fig. 5) in Rat 1 fibroblasts. Furthermore, studies in PC12 and CHO
cells failed to report constitutive regulation of MAPK isoforms or
growth responses for
1D-AR, although this
receptor constitutively activates calcium transients in Rat 1 fibroblasts (Garcia-Sainz and Torres-Padilla, 1999
). Several reports
have shown that the
1D-AR is weakly coupled to
intracellular signals (Theroux et al., 1996
; Ruan et al., 1998
; Taguchi
et al., 1998
). An apparent lack of agonist-mediated, growth-related
responses is consistent with constitutive or agonist-independent
signaling by the
1D-AR. The overall conclusion
from heterologous expression studies is that growth-related responses
are dependent on
1-AR subtype and host cell.
Whether
1-AR subtypes differentially regulate MAPK activity and growth of various peripheral arteries is the focus of
our ongoing investigations.
Our results indicate that ERK1/2 activation is associated with
increased protein biosynthesis rather than proliferative growth of Rat
1 fibroblasts. For example, the ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor PD98059 blocks
ERK1/2 activity in
1B-AR- and
1D-AR-expressing cells (Fig. 6), but does not
reverse agonist-mediated inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation in either cell line
(Fig. 8, A and C), suggesting that ERK1/2 activation is not required
for
1-AR-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis.
In contrast to its effects on PE-mediated DNA replication, PD98059
attenuates PE-mediated increases in
[35S]methionine incorporation in
1B-AR-expressing cells (Fig. 8B), suggesting
this receptor couples agonist binding to protein biosynthesis through
ERK1/2. Basal [35S]methionine incorporation is
elevated in
1D-AR- relative to
1B-AR-expressing fibroblasts (Fig. 8, compare
B and D). The ERK1/2 pathway inhibitor PD98059 blocks basal ERK1/2
activity (Fig. 6) and [35S]methionine
incorporation (Fig. 8D), suggesting that constitutive ERK1/2 activity
is coupled to increases in protein biosynthesis in
1D-AR-expressing cells. The physiological
significance of agonist-dependent increases in ERK1/2 and protein
biosynthesis by the
1B-AR and constitutive
activity of these responses by the
1D-AR are
not known. We did not observe increases in cell size (hypertrophy) in
unstimulated
1D-AR cells or in agonist-treated
1B-ARs (data not shown). It is possible that
constitutive activation of ERK1/2 for
1D-ARs
or agonist-mediated increases in ERK1/2 via
1B-ARs induces a differentiated or synthetic
phenotype characterized by constitutive synthesis of extracellular
matrix proteins in Rat 1 fibroblasts.
In contrast to the requirement for ERK1/2 activation in
[35S]methionine incorporation, inhibition of
DNA synthesis occurs through an ERK1/2-independent pathway for both
1-AR subtypes (Fig.
10). Similar to a previous study
examining DNA synthesis in CHO cells expressing the
1A-AR (Keffel et al., 2000
), the p38 kinase
inhibitor SB203850 reverses PE-mediated inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation in the
1B-AR cell line (Fig. 9A). The lack of effect
of SB203580 on PE-mediated inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation and elevated basal
[35S]methionine incorporation in the
1D-AR cell line is consistent with the
inability of this receptor subtype to induce p38 kinase activation
(Fig. 5). Therefore, inhibition of
[3H]thymidine incorporation in response to
1D-AR activation may occur through JNK and/or
other signaling cascades in this cell line.
|
As illustrated in Fig. 10, we propose that agonist activation of the
1B-AR induces p38 kinase and ERK1/2 activation
and increases protein biosynthesis. In addition, our results indicate
that the
1B-AR uses both ERK1/2 and p38
kinase-dependent pathways to induce protein biosynthesis. Use of two
parallel pathways may explain the robust effect of agonist on protein
synthesis in the
1B-AR relative to the
1D-AR cell line (Fig. 2). In contrast to the regulatory properties of
1B-ARs, increases in
protein biosynthesis occur primarily through constitutive ERK1/2
activity for the
1D-AR. Furthermore,
inhibition of DNA replication occurs through an ERK1/2-independent pathway in both cell lines, suggesting that the profile of MAPK activity (i.e., ERK1/2 versus JNK or p38 kinase) may differentiate growth-related responses in Rat 1 fibroblasts.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Carol Swiderski for expert technical assistance; Drs.
Steven Post, Martin Michel, and Dianne Perez for helpful discussions; and Dr. Tatyana Voyno-Yasentskaya for pGEX-cJun expression plasmid. We
also thank Dr. Dianne Perez for Rat 1 fibroblasts expressing
1-AR subtypes used in these studies (made
available to Dr. Perez from GlaxoSmithKline).
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 20, 2001.
Received for publication May 8, 2001.
1 Current Address: Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, 1460 University Dr., Winchester, VA 22601. E-mail: bwaldrop{at}su.edu
This study was supported by an American Heart Association Scientist Development grant and the University of Kentucky Medical Center Research Fund (to G.R.P.), American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education predoctoral fellowship (to B.A.W.), National Institutes of Health HL-38120 (to M.T.P.), and American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid (to M.T.P. and G.R.P.).
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ginell R. Post, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0082. E-mail: grpost{at}pop.uky.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AR, adrenergic receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PE, phenylephrine; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MBP, myelin basic protein; IOD, integrated optical density; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; SB, SB203580.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Chen, R. R. Hodges, C. Funaki, D. Zoukhri, R. J. Gaivin, D. M. Perez, and D. A. Dartt Effects of {alpha}1D-adrenergic receptors on shedding of biologically active EGF in freshly isolated lacrimal gland epithelial cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): C946 - C956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||