![]() |
|
|
Vol. 299, Issue 3, 960-966, December 2001
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (C.L.D., H.A.B., R.L.) and Department of Neuroscience and Anatomy, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.L.D.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Muscarinic autoreceptors modulate cholinergic neurotransmission in animals ranging from insects to humans. No previous studies have characterized autoreceptor modulation of acetylcholine (ACh) release in prefrontal cortex of intact mouse. Data obtained from experiments in 45 mice considered ACh as a phenotype and tested the hypothesis that pharmacologically defined M2 receptors modulate ACh release in prefrontal cortex of C57BL/6J mouse. In vivo microdialysis quantified ACh release during delivery of Ringer's (control) or Ringer's containing muscarinic receptor antagonists. The lowest concentration of each antagonist [scopolamine, pirenzepine, or 11-2[(-[(diethylamino)methyl]-1-piperidinyl)-acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4)-benzodiazepine-one (AF-DX116)] that significantly increased ACh release was determined and defined as the minimum ACh-releasing concentration. Dialysis delivery of scopolamine caused a concentration-dependent increase in ACh release, consistent with the existence of muscarinic autoreceptors. The order of potency for causing increased ACh release was scopolamine = AF-DX116 > pirenzepine. Administration of pertussis toxin into prefrontal cortex blocked the AF-DX116-induced increase in ACh release. These findings support the conclusion that M2 receptors modulate ACh release in C57BL/6J mouse prefrontal cortex. Nearly every human gene has a mouse homolog and the appeal of mouse models is reinforced by the identification of mouse genes causing phenotypic deviants. The present data encourage comparative phenotyping of cortical ACh release in additional mouse strains.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Muscarinic
cholinergic autoreceptors contribute to the regulation of ACh released
by both peripheral and central neurons. Muscarinic autoreceptors
inhibit ACh release (Starke et al., 1989
) and modulate end organ
responsiveness in vascular smooth muscle of the eye (Steinle and Smith,
2000
), stomach (Ogishima et al., 2000
), urinary bladder (D'Agostino et
al., 1997
), and upper airway (Ten Berge et al., 1996a
). Central
cholinergic neurotransmission is altered by muscarinic autoreceptors at
the level of the brain stem (Baghdoyan et al., 1998
), midbrain
(Kitaichi et al., 1999
), forebrain (Disko et al., 1999
), and cortex
(Quirion et al., 1994
). Muscarinic autoreceptors modulate cholinergic
neurotransmission in animals ranging from insects (Judge and Leitch,
1999
) to humans (Ten Berge et al., 1996b
).
Disorders of cognition and memory stimulate interest in cortical
autoreceptors as potential targets for drug development (Buccafusco and
Terry, 2000
). For example, the depletion of cortical M2 receptors in
Alzheimer's disease may reflect the loss of presynaptic autoreceptors on cholinergic terminals arising from the nucleus basalis of Meynert (Mesulam, 1998
). One specific function of prefrontal cortex
is manipulation of briefly stored information, or working memory (for
review, see Goldman-Rakic, 1996
; Gabrieli et al., 1998
). Studies in rat
report that ACh efflux in prefrontal cortex is enhanced during
performance of a memory task (Hironaka et al., 2001
). Cortical slice
preparations taken from outbred strains of mice suggest that M2
autoreceptors modulate ACh outflow (Iannazzo and Majewski, 2000a
,
2000b
). No previous studies, however, have characterized autoreceptor
modulation of ACh release from cortex of intact mouse.
Enthusiasm for murine models is reinforced by the fact that nearly
every human gene has a mouse homolog (O'Brien et al., 1999
). The mouse
genomic sequence is anticipated to be 90% completed by 2003, enhancing
genotyping and phenotyping relevant to human disease (Denny and
Justice, 2000
). Many mouse genes have been identified as the source of
phenotypic deviants (Copeland et al., 1993
; Silver, 1995
) providing an
important justification for the present effort to characterize central
nervous system cholinergic neurotransmission as a phenotype. Chimeras
crossed to the C57BL/6J (B6) mouse have been used to target genes
coding for a wide range of receptors and signal transduction molecules
(Gerlai, 1996
). The B6 mouse provides the genomic background for many
transgenic and knockout models (Silver, 1995
). Therefore, the present
study was designed to test the hypothesis that muscarinic autoreceptors modulate ACh release in prefrontal cortex of B6 mouse. This study also
aimed to identify the muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) subtype
regulating ACh release. In vivo microdialysis was used to deliver
muscarinic antagonists with different affinities for the five mAChR
subtypes and to collect endogenous ACh. The objective was to quantify
the minimal antagonist concentration causing a significant increase in
ACh release. This technique has been used successfully to identify M2
autoreceptors as regulators of ACh release in rat striatum (Billard et
al., 1995
) and cat pontine reticular formation (Baghdoyan et al.,
1998
). Portions of these data have been presented in abstract form
(Douglas et al., 2000
).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal Care. Animal handling and procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academy of Sciences Press, 1996). Adult male B6 mice (n = 45, 25-35 g; Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were housed in a 12:12 light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. All experiments took place between 10 AM and 5 PM.
Drug Preparation.
Scopolamine methyl bromide, pirenzepine
dihydrochloride, tetrodotoxin (TTX), and pertussis toxin (PTX) (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO) were dissolved in Ringer's solution (147 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM CaCl, 4.0 mM KCl, and 10 µM neostigmine bromide). AF-DX116 (a gift
from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) was dissolved initially in
0.05 N HCl and then diluted in Ringer's. The maximum HCl concentration in the final dilution (0.1 µM) previously was shown to have no effect
on ACh release (Baghdoyan et al., 1998
).
In Vivo Microdialysis and High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Electrochemical Detection (HPLC/EC). CMA/11 microdialysis probes (CMA/Microdialysis, Acton, MA) measuring 1.0 mm in length and 0.24 mm in diameter were used for all antagonist and TTX studies. The molecular weight cutoff of the CMA/11 cuprophane dialysis membrane is 6,000 Da. The molecular weight of ACh is less than 150 Da. IBR-2 combination microdialysis/microinjection probes (Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., West Lafayette, IN) measuring 1.0 mm in length and 0.36 mm in diameter with a 30,000 Da molecular weight cutoff were used for all PTX studies. Ringer's and drug solutions were delivered to the dialysis probe at a constant rate of 2.0 µl/min with a CMA/100 pump. Dialysis samples of 25 µl were collected every 12.5 min.
Samples collected for quantification of ACh were injected into an HPLC/EC (Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., West Lafayette, IN) system, as described previously (Baghdoyan et al., 1998Anesthesia and Animal Preparation.
At the beginning of each
experiment, mice were weighed and anesthesia was induced by
administering 1.5 to 2% isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories, North
Chicago, IL) in 100% O2. Anesthetized mice were
placed in a David Kopf (Tujunga, CA) model 962 stereotaxic frame with a
model 921 mouse adapter and rat ear bars. Anesthesia was maintained by
0.70 to 0.82% isoflurane delivered through a tube covering the nose.
Delivered isoflurane concentration was measured using a Raman
spectrometer (Ohmeda Rascal II, Louisville, CO). Anesthetic level was
evaluated constantly by observation of spontaneous movements and by
response to hindlimb pinch. Respiratory rate and core body temperature
were monitored every 12.5 min. Body temperature was maintained in a
normal range (35.5-36.5°C) with the use of a TP400 T/Pump Heat
Therapy System (Gaymar, Orchard Park, NY). The scalp was opened to
expose the skull from approximately 5 mm anterior to bregma to 5 mm
posterior to lambda. A small craniotomy allowed access to the brain and
the microdialysis probe was aimed for prefrontal cortex, designated as
frontal association cortex by the mouse brain stereotaxic atlas
(Franklin and Paxinos, 1997
). The aim site was 3.0 mm anterior to
bregma and 1.6 mm lateral from the midline. The dorsal-ventral position
of each probe was determined visually with the membrane resting fully
within cortex. Probes were dialyzed continuously with Ringer's solution.
Experimental Design. After probe insertion, several initial dialysis samples were collected to ensure stable baseline ACh release from prefrontal cortex. Six dialysis samples (75 min) then were collected and the ACh quantified from these samples was averaged to determine baseline ACh release. A CMA/110 liquid switch then was used to change the dialysate from Ringer's alone to Ringer's containing a drug, allowing uninterrupted dialysis. Prefrontal cortex was dialyzed with either scopolamine (1, 3, 10, 30, or 100 nM), AF-DX116 (0.3, 1, 3, or 30 nM), pirenzepine (100 or 300 nM), or TTX (1 µM) while an additional six dialysis samples (75 min) were collected. Drug-induced changes in ACh release are presented as percent change from control and are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Only one drug concentration was tested per experiment and each mouse was used for only one experiment. At the conclusion of each experiment, the microdialysis probe was removed from the cortex, the scalp wound was closed with wound clips, and the mouse was allowed to recover overnight.
One goal of the present study was to identify the mAChR subtype modulating ACh release in mouse prefrontal cortex. The lack of subtype-selective mAChR ligands presents a challenge for studies aiming to identify functional roles of mAChR subtypes. Whereas no purely subtype-selective mAChR agonists are available, a number of antagonists display different binding affinities for the five mAChR subtypes (Caulfield and Birdsall, 1998
-subunit and uncouple the inhibitory G protein (Carty, 1994Histology.
After each experiment, brains were removed for
histological processing to confirm probe placements. Brains were frozen
in a bromobutane/isopentane bilayer, then mounted for coronal
sectioning at 40 µm on a Bright model OTF cryostat (Huntingdon,
Cambs, England). Cut sections were thaw-mounted onto gelatin coated
slides, dried for 2 h under vacuum desiccation, and then fixed
with paraformaldehyde vapors at 80°C. The fixed sections were stained
with cresyl violet, backlit with a Northern Light illuminator (Imaging
Research, St. Catherine's, ON, Canada) and digitized with a Cohu (San
Diego, CA) charge-coupled device camera connected to a Macintosh G-3 computer. These digitized images were used to localize microdialysis probe placements as compared with a stereotaxic atlas (Franklin and
Paxinos, 1997
). Only results from experiments in which the dialysis
probes were localized fully within prefrontal cortex are reported.
Data Analysis. Fifteen mice were used for the scopolamine concentration-response study (three mice per concentration) and data were analyzed by repeated measures of one-way analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's test. The scopolamine, AF-DX116, and pirenzepine minimum-releasing concentration studies were conducted using six mice each and analyzed by t test. Data collected for the TTX study were obtained from three mice and analyzed by t test. Pertussis toxin studies were conducted in nine mice, and statistical significance was tested with analysis of variance, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Degrees of freedom and probability values are provided under Results.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histological examination verified that microdialysis probes were
placed fully within the prefrontal cortex. Figure
1A shows a digitized cresyl
violet-stained coronal mouse brain section. This image illustrates a
typical microdialysis probe site. Stereotaxic coordinates for the
center of each probe were localized along the rostral-caudal axis by
comparison to the mouse brain atlas (Franklin and Paxinos, 1997
). A
metric ruler was digitized with each sectioned brain to calibrate the
position of each dialysis probe along the medial-lateral and
dorsal-ventral axes. Figure 1, B and C, shows the probe centers from 45 experiments in relation to a B6 brain viewed from above (Rosen et al.,
2000
). Rostral-caudal probe center placements ranged from 2.78 to 3.06 mm anterior to bregma. Medial-lateral probe center placements ranged
from 1.4 to 2.1 mm from the midline. Dorsal-ventral probe center
placements ranged from 0.5 to 0.8 mm below the surface of the cortex.
|
Figure 2 shows that microdialysis
delivery of 1 µM TTX decreased ACh release in prefrontal cortex.
Figure 2A illustrates a typical time course of ACh release as a
function of sequential dialysis sample. Figure 2B shows data summarized
from three experiments. TTX significantly decreased ACh release by 55%
(t = 5.5; df = 34; p < 0.0001). These
findings are consistent with the view that ACh measured in this study
represents vesicular release.
|
The effect of scopolamine on the time course of ACh release during
three separate experiments is shown in Fig.
3. Microdialysis administration of 1 nM
scopolamine caused no change in ACh levels. In contrast, dialysis
delivery of 10 nM scopolamine began to increase ACh release by the
100-min time point. Dialysis delivery of 100 nM scopolamine caused an
increase in ACh release within the first 12.5 min of dialysis delivery.
|
Figure 4 summarizes results from
experiments in 15 mice showing that dialysis delivery of scopolamine
caused a concentration-dependent increase in ACh release (F = 30.5; df = 4, 72; p < 0.0001). Multiple comparisons statistic (Dunnett's) showed that microdialysis delivery of 3, 10, 30, and 100 nM scopolamine each significantly increased ACh
release over control levels (asterisks indicate p < 0.05).
|
The minimum ACh-releasing concentrations and maximum non-ACh-releasing
concentrations for three mAChR antagonists are shown in Fig.
5. The most potent antagonists were
scopolamine and AF-DX116. The minimum ACh-releasing concentration for
scopolamine was 3 nM, which produced a 14.2 ± 3.8% increase in
ACh release (t = 3.2; df = 38; p < 0.01).
The minimum ACh-releasing concentration for AF-DX116 was also 3 nM,
which caused a 19.6 ± 2.4% increase in ACh release (t = 6.74; df = 34; p < 0.01). The least potent mAChR
antagonist was pirenzepine, with a minimum ACh-releasing concentration
of 300 nM, causing a 27.0 ± 2.17% increase in ACh release
(t = 11.4; df = 34; p < 0.0001).
|
Figure 6 summarizes the results of nine
experiments designed to determine the effect of PTX on
AF-DX116-stimulated ACh release. Delivery of 3 nM AF-DX116 into
prefrontal cortex caused a significant (p < 0.001)
increase in ACh release (Fig. 6A). Microinjection of PTX into the
cortical dialysis site blocked the AF-DX116-induced increase in ACh
release (Fig. 6B).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three main findings emerged from the present study. First, microdialysis delivery of scopolamine to prefrontal cortex caused a concentration-dependent increase in ACh release, consistent with the hypothesis that ACh release in mouse prefrontal cortex is modulated by muscarinic autoreceptors. Second, quantification of the minimum ACh-releasing concentrations for three mAChR antagonists revealed the order of potency to be scopolamine = AF-DX116 > pirenzepine. This finding suggests that the M2 subtype modulates ACh release in prefrontal cortex of B6 mouse. Third, the discovery that pertussis toxin blocked AF-DX116-evoked ACh release is consistent with M2 autoreceptors functioning as modulators of ACh release. These three findings are considered below after noting the limitations of this study.
Limitations.
Potential methodological limitations include the
presence of neostigmine in the dialysis solution (Ringer's), diffusion
of antagonists away from the microdialysis probe, and the possibility of ACh release increasing as a result of antagonist binding to postsynaptic mAChRs. These issues have been discussed in detail elsewhere (Billard et al., 1995
; Baghdoyan et al., 1998
). It must be
acknowledged that although the present study clearly demonstrates modulation of ACh release by M2 receptors, the data do not prove that
these M2 receptors are autoreceptors. Postsynaptic heteroreceptors may
have caused increased ACh release via feedback circuitry. Evidence from
cortical slice preparations, however, supports locally mediated
enhancement of cortical ACh release (Iannazzo and Majewski, 2000a
). The
decreased ACh levels caused by TTX (Fig. 2) are consistent with the
likelihood that ACh measured by microdialysis reflects synaptic
release, rather than changes in ACh turnover. This interpretation follows from the fact that TTX eliminates the propagation of action potentials by blocking sodium channels (Catterall, 1992
).
Multiple Lines of Evidence for M2 Autoreceptor Subtype in Prefrontal Cortex of B6 Mouse. Scopolamine caused an increase in cortical ACh levels (Figs. 3 and 4). The scopolamine effects on ACh release were rapid in onset (Fig. 3), sustained for the duration of antagonist delivery (Fig. 3), and concentration-dependent (Fig. 4). These data encouraged efforts to identify the mAChR subtype modulating cortical ACh release. The Fig. 5 results show minimum ACh-releasing concentrations of 3 nM for scopolamine and AF-DX116 and 300 nM for pirenzepine.
The likelihood that the M2 subtype modulates cortical ACh release is based on the following rationale. Scopolamine has equal and high affinity for all mAChR subtypes and AF-DX116 has a higher affinity for the M2 and M4 subtypes than for the M1, M3, or M5 subtypes (Billard et al., 1995Functional Implications of M2 Autoreceptors as Modulators of ACh
Release in Prefrontal Cortex.
The present ACh release data from
anesthetized mouse cannot directly address autonomic or behavioral
functions regulated by prefrontal cortex (Uylings et al., 2000
).
Evidence that ACh release in prefrontal cortex is modulated by M2
receptors, however, does have clear functional implications. ACh is
understood to be an essential regulator of cortical excitability
(reviewed in Sarter and Bruno, 2000
). The prefrontal cortex contributes
to the regulation of attention and arousal (Groenewegen and Uylings,
2000
). Deactivation of prefrontal cortex has been interpreted as "the
single most salient feature common to both nonrapid eye movement and
rapid eye movement sleep and may be a defining characteristic of sleep per se" (Braun et al., 1997
). Behavioral (Horne, 1993
; Harrison and
Horne, 1997
) and functional MRI (Drummond et al., 1999
) data show that
sleep deprivation interferes with consolidation of working memory. The
foregoing data are consistent with the view that prefrontal cortical
function is particularly vulnerable to sleep deprivation (Horne, 1993
;
Harrison and Horne, 1997
) and anesthesia (Andrade, 1996
; Casele-Rondi,
1996
). Autoreceptor loss has been suggested as a factor contributing to
Alzheimer's disease (Mesulam, 1998
) characterized by cognitive decline
and sleep disruptions. Age-related decrements in mAChR density recently
have been demonstrated in human frontal cortex by PET imaging studies
(Zubieta et al., 2001
). Thus, the present results are consistent with
functional evidence that cell excitability in prefrontal cortex is
altered by mAChRs (Haj-Dahmane and Andrade, 1998
).
Conclusions.
The conclusion that ACh release is modulated by
autoreceptors of the M2 subtype may be limited to B6 mouse. The results
encourage future studies aiming to determine whether the M2 subtype
modulates ACh release in different mouse strains. Such comparative
studies may contribute to a better understanding of autoreceptors as a protein phenotype expressed by genetically distinct strains of mice.
The relative value of using ACh release as a phenotype versus other
pharmacological and behavioral methods remains to be demonstrated. The
present data provide an essential first step in the evaluation of ACh
as a phenotype versus other measures. Elucidating presynaptic mechanisms modulating cholinergic neurotransmission may lead to pharmacological strategies that can offset disease-related reductions in cortical ACh release (Buccafusco and Terry, 2000
).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Boehringer Ingelheim for providing AF-DX116. We thank M. Wilcox and M. A. Norat for expert assistance and Dr. Stephen K. Fisher for critical comments.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 6, 2001.
Received for publication July 12, 2001.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL65272, HL40881, HL57120, and MH45361 and by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ralph Lydic, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: rlydic{at}med.umich.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACh, acetylcholine; AF-DX116, 11-2[(-[(diethylamino)methyl]-1-piperidinyl)-acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3-b)(1,4)-benzodiazepine-one; B6, C57BL/6J; HPLC/EC, high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection; mAChR, muscarinic cholinergic receptor; PTX, pertussis toxin; TTX, tetrodotoxin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-M. Zhang, H.-Y. Zhou, S.-R. Chen, D. Gautam, J. Wess, and H.-L. Pan Control of Glycinergic Input to Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons by Distinct Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes Revealed Using Knockout Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2007; 323(3): 963 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Zhang, S.-R. Chen, and H.-L. Pan Regulation of Glutamate Release From Primary Afferents and Interneurons in the Spinal Cord by Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 102 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lydic, R. Garza-Grande, R. Struthers, and H. A. Baghdoyan Nitric oxide in B6 mouse and nitric oxide-sensitive soluble guanylate cyclase in cat modulate acetylcholine release in pontine reticular formation J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1666 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-L. Wang, H.-M. Zhang, D.-P. Li, S.-R. Chen, and H.-L. Pan Dynamic regulation of glycinergic input to spinal dorsal horn neurones by muscarinic receptor subtypes in rats J. Physiol., March 1, 2006; 571(2): 403 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Douglas, G. N. Bowman, H. A. Baghdoyan, and R. Lydic C57BL/6J and B6.V-LEPOB mice differ in the cholinergic modulation of sleep and breathing J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2005; 98(3): 918 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gonsenhauser, C. G. Wilson, F. Han, K. P. Strohl, and T. E. Dick Strain differences in murine ventilatory behavior persist after urethane anesthesia J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 888 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-K. Kim, N. R. Prabhakar, and G. K. Kumar Acetylcholine release from the carotid body by hypoxia: evidence for the involvement of autoinhibitory receptors J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2004; 96(1): 376 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Douglas, H. A. Baghdoyan, and R. Lydic Postsynaptic Muscarinic M1 Receptors Activate Prefrontal Cortical EEG of C57BL/6J Mouse J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3003 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Douglas, H. A. Baghdoyan, and R. Lydic Prefrontal Cortex Acetylcholine Release, EEG Slow Waves, and Spindles Are Modulated by M2 Autoreceptors in C57BL/6J Mouse J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2817 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||