|
|
|
|
Vol. 299, Issue 3, 894-900, December 2001
Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Inflammation Research, The William Harvey Research Institute, St. Bartholomew's and the Royal London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom (F.G.,T.D.W.); and Unit of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Imperial College of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory properties of
salicylate are not well understood. In particular, while salicylate inhibits prostaglandin production in vivo it only weakly inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 or -2 activity in vitro. Thus, it has often been
suggested that in vivo salicylate may inhibit the expression rather
than the activity of COX, particularly COX-2. Using a model of acute
COX-2 expression in the rat, we show that salicylate inhibits COX-2
activity in vivo without affecting COX-2 expression. In anesthetized
rats LPS (6 mg kg
1, i.p.) increased the expression of
COX-2 as evidenced by increased circulating levels of
6-keto-prostaglandin F1
(6-keto-PGF1
, a
stable breakdown product of PGI2), greatly exaggerated
formation of 6-keto-PGF1
following arachidonic acid (AA)
challenge (3 mg kg
1, i.v.), and increased expression of
COX-2, but not COX-1, protein. Diclofenac (3 mg kg
1,
i.p.) or the COX-2 selective agent diisopropyl fluorophosphate (10 mg
kg
1, i.p.) decreased the LPS-induced increase in
circulating 6-keto-PGF1
and the exaggerated
6-keto-PGF1
production following AA challenge. Sodium
salicylate (20 or 120 mg kg
1, i.p.) (administered either
1 h prior, or once per day for 3 days prior, to LPS injection)
reduced only the LPS-induced increase in circulating
6-keto-PGF1
, but not the exaggerated
6-keto-PGF1
production following AA challenge or the
expression of COX-2. Thus, salicylate inhibits LPS-induced COX-2
activity in a manner that is overcome by provision of excess substrate
and independent of effects on COX-2 expression. In conclusion, our
results exclude mechanisms other than direct enzyme inhibition as
responsible for the anti-COX effects of salicylate.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibition
of cyclooxygenase (COX), and therefore prostaglandin production, is the
common mechanism of action of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs; Vane, 1971
). As is now well appreciated, COX exists as two
isoforms. In general terms, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) is constitutive
and present in, for example, the endothelium, stomach, and kidney,
whereas cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is induced by pro-inflammatory
cytokines and endotoxin in cells in vitro and at inflammatory sites in
vivo (Mitchell and Warner, 1999
). Although revisited following the
discovery of COX-1 and COX-2, Vane's findings still explain the
biochemical mechanism of action of NSAIDs. However, the mechanism of
action of salicylate remains a debated issue.
In vivo salicylate is approximately equipotent to aspirin as an
anti-inflammatory (Smith et al., 1975
) and as an inhibitor of
prostaglandin formation at inflammatory sites (Higgs et al., 1987
).
However, in vitro salicylate is a much weaker inhibitor of
prostaglandin formation than aspirin (Vane, 1971
). This simple observation has led many researchers to look for alternative mechanisms of action to explain the anti-inflammatory activity of salicylate. Of
particular popularity has been the idea that salicylate and aspirin
exert their anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the activation of
NF-
B (Kopp and Ghosh, 1994
). For example, salicylate has been shown
to suppress a number of NF-
B-mediated responses, including chemokine
and adhesion molecule gene expression (Gautam et al., 1995
; Weber et
al., 1995
), cytokine-dependent transcription of inducible nitric-oxide
synthase (iNOS) (Farivar et al., 1996
), and cellular kinase activity
(Frantz and O'Neill, 1995
). Thus, despite some contrasting evidence
(O'Sullivan et al., 1993
; Barrios-Rodiles et al. 1996
) by the end of
1996, salicylate was being reviewed as a transcription-modulating drug
(Beauparlant and Hiscott, 1996
; Cai et al., 1996
; Goodnight, 1996
).
More recently, the idea that salicylate's anti-inflammatory activity
is exerted through inhibition of COX expression rather than by
inhibition of COX activity has gained new support (Wu, 1998
; Xu et al.,
1999
). However, Mitchell et al. (1997)
showed in vitro that the ability
of salicylate to inhibit COX is influenced by experimental conditions,
particularly by the supply of arachidonic acid, the substrate for COX
substrate. Indeed, a moment's reflection on enzyme/inhibitor
interactions reminds us that an enzyme inhibitor that acts by competing
with the substrate will appear increasingly less active in the presence
of increasingly high levels of substrate. Thus, when the excess amounts
of arachidonic acid often used in in vitro assays are reduced,
salicylate readily inhibits COX activity at concentrations far below
those required to inhibit NF-
B activation (Mitchell et al., 1997
).
Despite the large volume of literature regarding salicylate,
particularly the popular theory that salicylate inhibits the induction
of COX-2 expression, no one has actually explored the effects of
salicylate upon the expression and activity of COX-2 in vivo. Using a
model of LPS-dependent COX-2 induction in the rat, we investigated
whether there is any evidence for the transcription-modulating properties of salicylate characterized in vitro underlying the inhibition of prostaglandin production observed in vivo. Some of these
results have been presented to the British Pharmacological Society
(Giuliano and Warner, 2000
).
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
All compounds used were obtained from Sigma (Poole, UK) unless
otherwise stated. DFP (Leblanc et al., 1999
) was a gift from Merck
Frosst, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada. For the radioimmunoassays, antiserum to 6-keto-PGF1
was obtained from
Sigma, and
[3H]6-keto-PGF1
was
purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK, Ltd., (Little Chalfont,
Buckinghamshire, UK).
Surgical Procedure
Male Wistar rats (220-250 g; Tuck, Rayleigh, UK) were
anesthetized by injection of thiobutabarbital sodium (120 mg
kg
1, i.p.). Body temperature was maintained at
37°C by means of a homeothermic blanket (Harvard Apparatus,
Edenbridge, UK) connected to a rectal probe. The trachea was cannulated
to facilitate ventilation. The right carotid artery was cannulated and
connected to a pressure transducer (PDCR 75, Druck Ltd., Leicester, UK)
for the monitoring of systemic blood pressure through a digital
recording device (PowerLab 8/s, ADInstruments, Hastings, UK). The
jugular vein was also cannulated to allow infusion of saline (4 ml
kg
1 h
1) and injection
of arachidonic acid (see below). Following surgery, animals were left
for 30 min to stabilize.
Experimental Design
Single Administration of Drugs.
Upon completion of the
surgical procedure, animals in the control and LPS groups were injected
(t = 0 h) with 2 ml kg
1
saline i.p. or Escherichia coli LPS (serotype 0127:B8; 6 mg
kg
1, i.p.), respectively. Rats in the LPS group
were treated either at time t =
1 h or
t = 4 h with vehicle (10% dimethyl sulfoxide in
saline) or 20 or 120 mg kg
1 sodium salicylate.
To avoid any direct effect on the induction of COX-2 protein diclofenac
(3 mg kg
1) or the selective COX-2 inhibitor DFP
(10 mg kg
1) were only administered at
t = 4 h. Six hours after LPS was injected, animals
were challenged with arachidonic acid (3 mg
kg
1), which was given as a bolus via the
jugular vein. Blood samples (300 µl) were taken via the carotid
artery cannula at t = 0, 2, 4, and 6 h, and 1 min
after administration of the AA bolus (t = 6AA). The
samples were centrifuged at 12,000g for 3 min (4°C), and
the plasma was removed, supplemented with heparin (15 U
ml
1, National Veterinary Supplies, Stoke on
Trent, UK), and stored at
20°C until further analysis. At the end
of the time course, animals in all experiments were killed by an
overdose of anesthetic. After death, lungs and sometimes aortae from
control rats (±LPS) and from animals receiving 20 or 120 mg
kg
1 sodium salicylate at t =
1 were removed and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were
stored at
80°C until preparation for Western blotting.
Repeated Administration of Drugs.
To mimic better the
therapeutic use of salicylate, additional groups of rats were treated
once daily for 3 days with 20 or 120 mg kg
1
sodium salicylate i.p or vehicle (saline). On the 4th day the treatment
was repeated 1 h before injecting LPS (see above). Half of the
saline-treated rats received LPS, the other were left untreated as
controls. The remainder of the experimental procedure was carried out
as described above.
Measurement of Plasma Prostaglandin 6-Keto-PGF1
Treatment of anesthetized rats with LPS induces the expression
of COX-2 (Salvemini et al., 1995
), which is correlated to elevations in
the plasma levels of 6-keto-PGF1
(Hamilton et
al., 1999
). Therefore, as an index of COX-2 activity, we measured
6-keto-PGF1
levels in the plasma samples by
radioimmunoassay, as previously described (Hamilton et al., 1999
).
Measurement of Nitrate/Nitrite Plasma Levels
LPS treatment of anesthetized rats induces an increase in NO
production following inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression (Thiemermann, 1997
). In the circulation, NO is largely converted to
nitrate, so nitrite/nitrate measurement can be used as an index of NO
synthesis. The nitrate present in plasma samples from control and
LPS-treated rats was enzymatically converted to nitrite following the
procedure described by Schmidt et al. (1992)
. The total nitrite concentration was then determined spectrophotometrically by the Griess reaction.
Western Blot Analysis
Rat lung or aortae were homogenized in 6 volumes of ice-cold
protein extraction buffer (0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM leupeptin, 0.07 mM pepstatin A, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and then
centrifuged at 17,500g (rotor Beckman 70.1 Ti) for 15 min. The resulting pellets were homogenized in extraction buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and then centrifuged at 17,500g for 30 min. The supernatant was then collected and centrifuged at
100,000g for 1 h. Pellets obtained were taken to be the
membrane fraction and resuspended in extracting buffer containing 1%
Triton X-100. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford
colorimetric assay (Bradford, 1976
). Protein extracts were then diluted
in a 1:1 ratio with sample buffer and boiled for 5 min (sample buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 10% w/v SDS, 10% v/v glycerol, 10% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.02% w/v bromphenol blue). Equal amounts of
protein (75 µg) were loaded onto 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and
subjected to electrophoresis for 1 h at 100 V. The separated proteins were then electrotransferred to nitrocellulose (Hybond-C super, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK, Ltd.) at 80 V for 1 h.
Following electrotransfer, the blots were incubated overnight at 4°C
in blocking solution (5% w/v dried low-fat milk and 0.1% v/v Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline) on an orbital shaker. The blots were then washed (three times, 5 min each) with washing buffer (Tween
20 0.1% v/v in phosphate-buffered saline) before being probed (1 h at
room temperature) with anti-COX-2 or anti-COX-1 antibody (rabbit
anti-mouse; SPI Bio, Massy Cedex, France) diluted 1:1000 in blocking
solution. Following incubation with the primary antibody, the blots
were washed (three times, 5 min) with blocking solution before being
probed (1 h at room temperature) with alkaline phosphatase-conjugate
secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG; New England Biolabs, Ltd.,
Hitchin, UK) diluted 1:2000 in blocking solution. The blots were then
developed using Phototope-horseradish peroxidase Western blot detection
kit (New England BioLabs, Ltd.). Images were captured on Hyperfilm
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK, Ltd.) and acquired by a Macintosh
computer connected to a densitometer (GS-700, Bio-Rad Laboratories
Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK). Densitometric analyses were by Molecular
Analyst (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd.)
Data Analysis
Data are reported as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analyses as described in individual legends were performed using GraphPad Prism 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of LPS on 6-Keto-PGF1
Formation.
The
circulating levels of 6-keto-PGF1
in naive
rats were significantly increased following treatment with LPS (Fig.
1). Similarly, the acute production of
PGI2 following AA (3 mg
kg
1, i.v.) challenge (determined by the plasma
levels of 6-keto-PGF1
; Fig. 1,
t = 6AA) was greatly exaggerated in animals exposed to LPS.
|
Effects of Salicylate, Diclofenac, and DFP on LPS-Associated
6-Keto-PGF1
Formation.
In naive rats 20 or 120 mg
kg
1 salicylate (administered 1 h before
LPS) significantly inhibited the elevation in circulating 6-keto-PGF1
caused by LPS treatment (Fig.
2). However, neither dose of salicylate
affected the exaggerated response to AA injection seen in LPS-treated
animals (Fig. 2). Even when administered to LPS-treated rats just
2 h before AA challenge (i.e., at t = 4 h
after LPS) 20 or 120 mg kg
1 salicylate still
had no effect upon the exaggerated AA-induced 6-keto-PGF1
production (Fig.
3). Unlike salicylate, both diclofenac (3 mg kg
1) and the selective COX-2 inhibitor DFP
(10 mg kg
1) reduced by more than 90% the
exaggerated increase in 6-keto-PGF1
formation
following AA challenge in LPS-treated rats (Fig. 3).
|
|
. In these pretreated animals
exposure to LPS caused no elevations in the circulating levels of
6-keto-PGF1
. In rats pretreated with saline,
as in naive animals, LPS produced a greatly exaggerated response to
bolus injection of AA (Figs. 1 and 4).
This exaggerated response following exposure to LPS was not different
in rats pretreated for 3 days with salicylate (Fig. 4).
|
Effects of Salicylate on LPS-Dependent Nitrate/Nitrite
Accumulation.
Because activation of NF-
B has been associated
with the induction of iNOS activity, we measured the time-dependent
increase in the circulating concentrations of nitrate/nitrite that
followed LPS injection as a further indicator of the effects of
salicylate upon NF-
B activation in vivo (Fig.
5 and Table
1). Pretreatment with 20 or 120 mg
kg
1 salicylate had no effect on this
accumulation (Table 1).
|
|
Western Blot Analysis.
LPS markedly up-regulated the
expression of COX-2 in rat lungs in a manner that was unaffected by 20 or 120 mg kg
1 salicylate given 1 h before
the administration of LPS (Fig. 6, A and
B). Similarly, COX-2 expression in rat aortae was increased by LPS and
this up-regulation was unaffected by salicylate 120 mg
kg
1 given 1 h before LPS administration
(Fig. 7, A and B). No changes in the
expression of COX-1 within the lung were found under any experimental
conditions (n = 3; data not shown).
|
|
Cardiovascular Effects.
There were no differences in the mean
arterial blood pressures of any groups of rats between
t = 0 and t = 6 h (respectively, 95 ± 4 mm Hg and 73 ± 3 mm Hg; n = 62;
p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA plus Bonferroni's test).
Interestingly, following injection of a bolus of arachidonic acid a
consistent decrease in blood pressure (
26 ± 3 mm Hg) was found
except in rats treated with diclofenac, in which the mean arterial
pressure rose by 11 ± 3 mm Hg (n = 5).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study shows clearly in vivo, for the first time, that
salicylate inhibits the activity of COX-2, i.e., formation of
PGI2, independent of an effect upon the
expression of COX-2. Indeed, salicylate acts as we would expect a weak
competitive inhibitor to act; it fails to reduce
PGI2 formation when excess substrate is present.
It does not act as an inhibitor of COX-2 expression; no reduction in
COX-2 expression was detected by Western blot analysis. Furthermore, if
salicylate did act to reduce the amount of COX-2 enzyme this would not
be so simply reversed as by the addition of excess substrate.
Therefore, salicylate can be seen simply to act as an inhibitor of the
enzymatic activity of COX-2, as we also show for the traditional NSAID
diclofenac and the selective COX-2-inhibitor DFP. Therefore, there is
no need for us to raise the possibility that salicylate acts in some
way to influence the expression of COX-2, e.g., by inhibiting NF-
B.
Our previous studies have established a clear correlation between LPS
administration, COX-2 induction and
6-keto-PGF1
accumulation in anesthetized rats
(Hamilton and Warner, 1998
). This was confirmed when we found that LPS
administration induced the up-regulation of COX-2 protein (but not
COX-1) and an increase in the plasma levels of
6-keto-PGF1
. COX-2 expression was principally
determined in lung tissue, because previous studies (Hamilton and
Warner, 1998
) have demonstrated that LPS administration induces the
expression of COX-2 in the vascular endothelium, and the lung contains
approximately half the body's endothelial cells. For confirmation we
also examined the expression of COX-2 in some aortic samples because in
earlier studies applying immunohistochemical analysis to this model we
have found induction of COX-2 expression in the endothelium of the
aorta, heart, spleen, and kidney, as well as the lung (L. C. Hamilton
and T. D. Warner, unpublished observations). The increased
circulating levels of 6-keto-PGF1
that
followed exposure to LPS were reduced by salicylate, diclofenac, and
the COX-2-selective inhibitor DFP.
Subsequent challenge with arachidonic acid (3 mg
kg
1; the highest dose that could routinely be
administered without immediate death of the experimental animals)
revealed that COX-2 induction was associated with a greatly exaggerated
increase in 6-keto-PGF1
levels; i.e., that the
synthetic capacity for 6-keto-PGF1
was much
more greatly enhanced than might appear from the simple measurement of
circulating 6-keto-PGF1
levels. However,
unlike its effect on the 6-h circulating accumulation
6-keto-PGF1
levels, and in contrast to
diclofenac and DFP, salicylate was without effect on the exaggerated
formation of 6-keto-PGF1
that followed bolus
administration of AA. This was true even if rats were pretreated with
salicylate for the preceding 3 days at a dose as high as 120 mg
kg
1; this pretreatment regimen was employed
because salicylate's serum half-life increases with dose (i.e., high,
repeated doses allow the highest salicylate levels in tissues to be
reached; Needs and Brooks, 1985
).
These observations lead to a clear conclusion about the functional
effects of salicylate; i.e., that salicylate acts in vivo as a weak
competitive inhibitor of the activity of COX, as has been found in
vitro (Mitchell et al., 1997
). However, in the presence of increased
substrate this activity is overwhelmed and COX activity revealed. This
is true even if we apply high doses of salicylate acutely
(t = 4 h), immediately before the induction of
COX-2 expression (t =
1 h), or for the preceding 3 days. Similar observations have been made in vitro, where the weak COX
inhibitor actions of salicylate are highly influenced by the supply of
substrate (Mitchell et al., 1997
).
Our observations give no support to the notion that salicylate inhibits
the induction of COX-2. First, if salicylate had reduced the expression
of COX-2, increasing the supply of substrate (i.e., bolus
administration of AA) should not simply cause a complete return of
synthetic capacity. Second, our Western blot analysis showed
that neither high nor low doses of salicylate had any effect on the
induction of COX-2 in the lung or in the aortic endothelium. Consistent
with this observation and in contrast to results from in vitro studies
in which high concentrations of salicylate have been reported to reduce
iNOS expression (Amin et al., 1995
; Kepka-Lenhart et al., 1996
;
Sakitani et al., 1997
; Kim et al., 1998
), we found salicylate to have
no effect upon the increases in plasma nitrate induced by LPS, even
when salicylate was given to the rats at high doses for the preceding 3 days.
Many authors have concluded that the anti-inflammatory activity of
salicylate and aspirin could be explained by its ability to affect the
activation of NF-
B (Yin et al., 1998
) or mitogen-activated protein
kinases (Alpert et al., 1999
), or by nonspecific effects on cellular
kinases (Frantz and O'Neill, 1995
) rather than, or in addition to, the
inhibition of COX. However, if salicylate acts as a
transcription-modifying drug with effects on the NF-
B pathway, why
did we find no evidence of any such effect in vivo, despite reductions
in the formation of PGI2? Most probably because the in vitro conditions under which transcription-modifying properties of salicylate are demonstrated are not relevant to in vivo conditions. For example, those studies that show transcription-modifying effects of
salicylate or aspirin have all been conducted in cell culture systems
and employed drugs at supratherapeutic concentrations (0.001-0.02 M).
Obviously, such systems cannot account for the pharmacokinetics of
salicylates, and in particular the instability of aspirin within the
circulation (Needs and Brooks, 1985
; Giuliano and Warner, 1999
). More
importantly, although referring to therapeutic plasma concentrations
(Insel, 1996
) the majority of the researchers investigating
salicylate's pharmacology have failed to appreciate that in the normal
therapeutic concentration range salicylate is strongly bound by plasma
proteins (80-90%) and that it is the unbound fraction that accounts
for pharmacological effects in vivo, i.e., the total plasma
concentrations of NSAIDs represent a scarcely meaningful clinical index
(Brouwers and de Smet, 1994
). It follows that in vitro testing of
salicylate at these therapeutic plasma concentrations in systems that
contain typically only 10 to 20% serum can easily produce misleading
results, rather than matching the total drug concentration one needs to
consider the relative concentrations of free drug. Therefore, the
choice of apparently nonpredictive experimental systems (e.g., low
protein levels, low levels of drug metabolism) combined with the use of extremely high salicylate, or aspirin, concentrations cast serious doubts on the conclusions drawn by many authors. The same reservations and conclusions apply to those in vitro studies that have demonstrated salicylates to inhibit iNOS induction, i.e., an effect that we could
not demonstrate in vivo. Indeed, in all the studies cited above (Amin
et al., 1995
; Kepka-Lenhart et al., 1996
; Sakitani et al., 1997
; Kim et
al., 1998
), supratherapeutic concentrations of salicylate were employed
in systems with low protein binding.
The physiological relevance of the findings of salicylates influencing
COX expression has never been fully investigated, although an
interesting study has been recently published (Xu et al., 1999
). This
study showed that pretreatment of mice with aspirin caused a
dose-dependent reduction of COX-2 mRNA in peritoneal macrophages following administration of LPS. Surprisingly, however, these same
authors did not explore the functional relevance of the reduction in
COX-2 transcription. In particular, due to the instability of mRNA for
COX-2 it is unlikely that it is linearly related to COX-2 protein
expression. Furthermore, as is made clear here and in earlier studies
(Hamilton et al., 1999
), the formation of COX-2 products is highly
regulated by the supply of substrate. Thus, despite a partial
suppression of COX-2 mRNA, changes in COX-2 protein expression could
well be insignificant and the total production of COX-2-derived
prostanoids unaffected.
Despite the relative abundance of publications claiming that salicylate
may exert its anti-COX effect through mechanisms other than inhibition
of COX activity, we have found no such evidence in vivo. Indeed, in the
LPS-treated rat, we show clearly that sodium salicylate, even at very
high sustained doses, has no effect on the expression of COX-2 protein,
although it does inhibit COX-2-dependent formation of
PGI2. The ability of salicylate to inhibit COX-2 activity in a weak substrate-dependent manner correlates well with its
ability to act as an anti-inflammatory only at high doses; i.e., at
inflammatory sites where phospholipase activity is increased and
arachidonic acid more abundant (Nevalainen et al., 2000
), salicylate is
a weak COX inhibitor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 15, 2001.
Received for publication May 25, 2001.
This work was supported by a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG.
J.A.M. is a Wellcome Career Development Fellow.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Timothy D. Warner, Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Inflammation Research, The William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. E-mail: t.d.warner{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
COX, cyclooxygenase;
AA, arachidonic acid;
NO, nitric oxide;
iNOS, inducible NO synthase;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
NF-
B, nuclear factor
B;
NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs;
PG, prostaglandin, ANOVA, analysis of variance;
DFP, diisopropyl
fluorophosphate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. C. Vlad, D. R. Miller, N. W. Kowall, and D. T. Felson Protective effects of NSAIDs on the development of Alzheimer disease Neurology, May 6, 2008; 70(19): 1672 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Aronoff, O. Boutaud, L. J. Marnett, and J. A. Oates Inhibition of Prostaglandin H2 Synthases by Salicylate Is Dependent on the Oxidative State of the Enzymes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2003; 304(2): 589 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Giuliano and T. D. Warner Origins of Prostaglandin E2: Involvements of Cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 in Human and Rat Systems J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 1001 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||