![]() |
|
|
Vol. 299, Issue 2, 434-441, November 2001
Arizona Cancer Center (G.S.W., M.G.G., R.I., S.E.S.) and Departments of Pharmacology (B.W.F.) and Pathology (M.W.K.), University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doxorubicin plays an important role in the treatment of leukemias, lymphomas, and a variety of carcinomas. Tumor cell resistance to doxorubicin is often associated with expression of the multidrug resistance gene MDR1, which codes for the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein, and a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Evidence from multiple sources suggests, however, that additional genes besides MDR1 are involved in development of multidrug resistance. To identify genes involved in the multidrug resistance phenotype, we created a 5760-gene cDNA microarray to search for differentially expressed genes between the human multiple myeloma cell line RPMI 8226 and its doxorubicin-selected sublines 8226/Dox6 and 8226/Dox40, both of which express MDR1 and are multidrug-resistant. The cDNA microarray results identified a set of differentially expressed genes, which included MDR1 as expected. Thirty Northern analyses were used to confirm the results of the cDNA microarrays; comparison with the microarray results showed a 90% agreement between the two techniques. Within the set of differentially expressed genes identified by the cDNA microarrays, 29 were of particular interest as they can participate in apoptotic signaling, particularly as mediated by ceramide and the mitochondrial permeability transition. The functional importance of these changes in gene expression is supported by their explanation of the 8226/Dox cell lines' cross-resistance to substances that are not P-glycoprotein substrates, such as Fas/CD95 ligand and staurosporine. We conclude that doxorubicin selection led to changes in gene expression that reduce the apoptotic response to death-inducing stimuli and thus contribute to the multidrug resistance phenotype.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doxorubicin
is important to the treatment of a variety of cancers; however, the
development of drug resistance reduces its effectiveness. Factors
reported to be involved in doxorubicin resistance include altered
expression of topoisomerase II (Nielsen et al., 1996
) and integrins
(Damiano et al., 1999
), changes in glutathione levels (Sinha et al.,
1989
), and expression of membrane-associated pumps such as
P-glycoprotein encoded by the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 (Dalton,
1997
). In the human multiple myeloma cell line, RPMI 8226, doxorubicin
selection at 60 nM resulted in a resistant variant, 8226/Dox6. Further
selection of 8226/Dox6 with 400 nM doxorubicin led to the highly
resistant 8226/Dox40 cell line. Both 8226/Dox cell lines possess a
multidrug-resistant phenotype. In association with this phenotype,
8226/Dox6 expresses MDR1 from a single gene copy while 8226/Dox40
expresses higher levels of P-glycoprotein from amplified MDR1 and in
turn displays higher levels of multidrug resistance (Futscher et al.,
1993
).
While MDR1 expression plays a significant role in the multidrug
resistance phenotype in the RPMI 8226, several observations indicate
that additional factors are involved. For example, MCF-7 cells
transfected with MDR1 compared with MCF-7 cells that expressed MDR1 as
a result of selection with doxorubicin were 15-fold more resistant than
the transfectants, even though the MDR1 transfectants produced
comparable levels of P-glycoprotein (Zyad et al., 1994
). Another study
compared cell lines that expressed P-glycoprotein from amplified
MDR1 and found that the cell line expressing the most P-glycoprotein
was 10-fold less resistant than a cell line with lower MDR1 expression
(Dolci et al., 1993
). Similarly suggestive results were found using the
8226 cell lines. When 8226/Dox40 was grown out of doxorubicin selection
for 53 weeks, the 8226/Dox40 cell line lost only 22% of its
P-glycoprotein expression while losing 87% of its drug resistance.
Finally, the 8226/Dox40 cell line is cross-resistant to the apoptotic
stimulus of Fas ligand, even though Fas ligand is not a substrate for
P-glycoprotein (Landowski et al., 1997
).
One explanation for the cross-resistance of 8226/D40 to Fas
ligand would be defect(s) in the apoptotic signaling that begins upon
Fas ligation. Evidence supporting an anti-apoptotic role for MDR1 in
addition to its drug efflux activity has been reported. Studies have
found evidence that P-glycoprotein prevents formation of the
proapoptotic ceramide in response to chemotherapeutics including
doxorubicin (Cabot et al., 1999
; Côme et al., 1999
; Sietsma et
al., 2000
). Ceramide is cleaved from sphingomyelin residing in the
inner leaflet by sphingomyelinases following stimulation by
chemotherapeutics and the death receptor ligands Fas tumor necrosis
factor-
(TNF-
). P-glycoprotein has been reported to act as a
broad specificity lipid translocase that reduces the availability of
inner leaflet sphingomyelin and thus prevents production of ceramide
(van Helvoort et al., 1996
). In addition, it has been recently shown
that P-glycoprotein-positive samples from patients with acute
myeloblastic leukemia were more resistant to induction of
ceramide-mediated apoptosis than P-glycoprotein-negative samples
(Pallis and Russell, 2000
). Doxorubicin-triggered apoptosis has gained
attention as evidence has accumulated that many chemotherapeutics kill
by activating the apoptotic processes (Dive and Hickman, 1991
; Hannun,
1997
; Los et al., 1997
). Thus defects in apoptotic signaling could
explain the cross-resistance to a wide variety of apoptosis inducers
displayed by cells selected for resistance to doxorubicin and other
chemotherapeutics (Smyth et al., 1998
; Johnstone et al., 1999
).
Evidence indicates ceramide is a key molecule in signaling apoptosis in
some cell types following treatment with TNF-
, Fas ligand, or
chemotherapeutics such as doxorubicin (Hannun, 1996
; Jaffrézou et al., 1996
; Mathias et al., 1998
). Furthermore,
inhibition of ceramide production and metabolism reduces apoptotic
death in MCF-7 cells following doxorubicin exposure (Lucci et al.,
1999
). Evidence exists for many downstream targets of ceramide, all of which can mediate the apoptotic/survival balance within cells (Kolesnick and Krönke, 1998
).
With this background in mind, we have analyzed the RPMI 8226 cell line and its multidrug-resistant variants, 8226/Dox6 and 8226/Dox40, using 5760-element cDNA microarrays to identify differential gene expression. The cDNA microarray analysis indicated that 7% of genes had some degree of altered expression as a result of doxorubicin selection. A subset of the differentially expressed genes was of particular interest because of the genes' roles in apoptotic signaling. Defects in apoptosis signaling provide an explanation of the 8226/Dox cells' cross-resistance to Fas and staurosporine, indicating the functional significance of the altered gene expression. These results show that genes are affected at the expression level by doxorubicin selection, which contributes to the multidrug-resistant phenotype by reducing apoptotic signaling.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Probe Preparation. Human cDNA bacterial clones were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). Referred to as gf200, the set consists of 5184 sequence-validated I.M.A.G.E. consortium bacterial clones. Approximately 3000 of these clones represent known genes, while the remaining clones represent expressed sequence tags. cDNA targets were produced by PCR amplification of the cDNA inserts directly from bacterial cultures. In brief, individual I.M.A.G.E. clones were grown in 96-well plates at 37°C for 6 h. One microliter of the bacterial culture was added to a 96-well plate containing 45 µl of premixed PCR reaction (Marsh BioProducts, Rochester, NY) and 4 µl of primer (2 µM, catalog number: GF200.primer, Research Genetics). Primers and unincorporated nucleotides were removed following the PCR amplification (initial denaturation step was 96°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 2.5 min) using a 96-well PCR clean up kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). PCR amplification and purification were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis, and PCR product yield was determined using a PicoGreen-based fluorescence assay (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in a 96-well format. Typical yields ranged from 1 to 5 µg. After quantitation, the purified PCR products were dried and resuspended in 10 µl of 2× SSC for printing onto slides.
Microarray Fabrication. cDNAs were printed onto chemically activated glass slides (CEL industries, Houston, TX) using four quill-type pins (catalog no. SMP4, Telechem International, San Jose, CA) mounted onto an OmniGrid robot (GeneMachines, San Carlos, CA). In addition to the 5184 I.M.A.G.E. consortium clones, a set of 88 human housekeeping genes (Research Genetics), a set of 8 Mesembryanthemum crystallinum genes, and Cy3 or Cy5 end-labeled oligonucleotides were placed strategically into the array to aid in data normalization, the measurement of nonspecific hybridization, and the identification of the corners of the array, respectively. Additionally, a set of 103 I.M.A.G.E. clones representing known genes of interest not found in gf200 were purchased from Research Genetics and included in the microarray. A list of the clones on the arrays can be found at http://microarray.azcc.arizona.edu/HUMAN5KLIST. After printing, the slides were placed in a humidity chamber overnight in the dark. The following day, slides were washed 1 min in 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 1 min in double distilled water at room temperature with mild agitation. Slides were then submerged in 240 ml of 75% (v/v) water/ethanol solution into which 0.6 g of sodium cyanoborohydride had been freshly dissolved. After 5 min at room temperature, slides were washed four times in double distilled water for 2 min with mild agitation and spun dry at 500g for 1 min. Slides were stored in the dark at room temperature and <40% humidity until use.
Cell Culture. RPMI 8226, 8226/Dox6, and 8226/D40 cells were cultured at 37°C in 95% air/5% CO2 and RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 50 I.U./ml penicillin, 50 mg/ml streptozotocin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. 8226/Dox6 was maintained in 60 nM doxorubicin, while 8226/D40 was maintained in 400 nM doxorubicin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Prior to mRNA isolation, 8226/Dox6 and 8226/D40 were cultured 1 week without doxorubicin to eliminate acute effects of doxorubicin from confounding the microarray results.
Target Preparation. Fluorescent first strand cDNA was made from 4 µg of poly(A+) RNA in the presence of 50 µM Cy5-dCTP or Cy3-dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ) in a 25-µl volume containing the following: 500 ng of oligo(dT)12-18, 1× Superscript buffer, 400 U of Superscript II, 3.3 U of RNase inhibitor (all from Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), 400 µM each of dGTP, dATP, dTTP, 100 µM dCTP, and 10 mM dithiothreitol. All reagents except the Superscript II were mixed on ice, placed at 65°C for 5 min and then 25°C for 5 min, at which point the Superscript was added and the mixture heated to 42°C for 2 h. The mRNA template was hydrolyzed by heating the reaction for 5 min at 95°C, adding 6.25 µl of 1 M NaOH, and incubating for 10 min at 37°C. Neutralization was achieved by the addition of 6.25 µl of 1 M HCl. Labeled cDNA from two reactions (one Cy3-labeled, one Cy5-labeled) was combined and purified on a microcon-50 column using four buffer exchanges (the first three were double-distilled water, the final exchange was 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). After elution from the column, probe was lyophilized to dryness, and resuspended in 10 µl of hybridization buffer (2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 100 ng/µl Cot1 DNA, 100 ng/µl oligo dA), denatured by boiling for 2.5 min, and added to a denatured (2-min boil slide in double distilled water, plunge into room temperature ethanol, spin dry at 500g) microarray. A cover slip (22 × 22 mm) was applied, and the array was placed in a hybridization chamber (catalog number HYB-03, GeneMachines) at 62°C for 18 h. Following hybridization, slides were washed by placing them into 50-ml conical tubes containing 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS for 5 min, 0.06× SSC, 0.1% SDS for 5 min, and 0.06× SSC for 2 min all at room temperature. Slides were scanned for Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence using a Axon GenePix 4000 microarray reader (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and quantitated using GenePix software. The RPMI 8226 versus 8226/Dox6 hybridizations were performed in triplicate, and the RPMI 8226 versus 8226/Dox40 hybridizations were performed seven times.
Northern Blot Analysis. Selected results obtained by cDNA microarray analysis were confirmed experimentally by Northern analysis. Some genes were selected based on their potential role in doxorubicin resistance or apoptosis signaling. Other genes were selected based simply on their expression ratios; genes were analyzed that were underexpressed, overexpressed, or unchanged in 8226/Dox6 and 8226/D40 relative to RPMI 8226. Briefly, 10 µg of total RNA from RPMI 8226 and 8226/Dox40 or RPMI 8226, 8226/Dox6, and 8226/Dox40 was size separated on a 1% denaturing formaldehyde agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with radiolabeled probes specific to the gene to be analyzed. Probe templates were obtained by PCR amplification of the cDNA insert from the respective I.M.A.G.E. Consortium clone used on the cDNA microarrays.
Data Analysis. Fluorescence intensity measurements from each array element were compared with local background and divided into two groups: those in which signal was more than 1.4 times the background in both the Cy3 and Cy5 channels, and those in which signal was 1.4-fold background in only one channel. Based on the variation of the data within each hybridization, a 90% confidence limit was determined for elements with signal over 1.4-fold background in both channels. Elements with signal below 1.4-fold background in one channel were designated as possible cases of a gene being turned on or off. A gene found to be differentially expressed in four of the seven hybridizations that compared RPMI 8226 with 8226/Dox40 was considered further for relevance to the multidrug-resistant phenotype. Next, a gene differentially expressed between RPMI 8226 and 8226/Dox40 was checked for evidence of differential expression in the RPMI 8226 versus 8226/Dox6 hybridizations.
Apoptosis Analysis. RPMI 8226 and 8226/D40 cells grown in log phase in the absence of doxorubicin for 1 week were treated with 100 nM or 500 nM staurosporine for 23 h. Cells were washed and incubated with propidium iodide and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Annexin-V according to the manufacturer's instructions (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) and compared with untreated cells using flow cytometry.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cDNA Microarray Analysis of a Multidrug-Resistant Model.
To
identify changes in gene expression that contribute to the
multidrug-resistant phenotype, the doxorubicin selected,
multidrug-resistant cell lines 8226/Dox6 and 8226/Dox40 were compared
with their doxorubicin-sensitive parent RPMI 8226. 8226/Dox6, which was
selected with 60 nM doxorubicin, represents an intermediate level of
resistance while 8226/Dox40 (selected at 400 nM doxorubicin) is highly
drug resistant (Futscher et al., 1993
). Following identification
of genes that could contribute to the multidrug-resistant phenotype in
8226/Dox40, the 8226/Dox6 cell line was analyzed as a way to observe
the emergence of the altered gene expression seen in the highly
resistant 8226/Dox40 cell line. 5287 unique human genes were examined
for differential expression using two-color fluorescence hybridization
to glass cDNA microarrays manufactured on site. Cy3-labeled cDNA from
either 8226/Dox6 or 8226/Dox40 was simultaneously hybridized with
Cy5-labeled cDNA from RPMI 8226. RPMI 8226 was compared with 8226/Dox40
seven times and compared with 8226/Dox6 three times.
|
Confirmation of Differential Gene Expression by Northern
Analysis.
To verify the microarray results, genes with increased,
decreased, or unchanged expression in response to doxorubicin selection were analyzed by Northern blot analysis. Figure
2 shows a comparison of the expression
ratios determined by cDNA microarray analysis and Northern blot
analysis for 30 genes. Overall, good agreement was seen between the two
techniques for analyzing gene expression, except for glutathione
S-transferase, a facilitated glucose transporter, and
fibronectin (labeled gene numbers 25, 27, and 28, respectively, in Fig.
2).
|
|
Identification of Genes with Potential Roles in the Multidrug
Resistance Phenotype.
Once differentially expressed genes were
identified and confirmed by Northern blot analyses, the significance of
the changes in gene expression were viewed in terms of their potential
effect on doxorubicin toxicity and the multidrug resistance phenotype. As a starting point, it was noted that cellular death in response to
doxorubicin is dose-dependent, with apoptosis being the predominant form of death at clinically relevant doses (Muller et al., 1997
). Exposing cells to clinically relevant doses of doxorubicin stimulates the production of ceramide by neutral sphingomyelinase (N-SMase) and
ceramide produced in this manner can then act as a second messenger
signaling apoptosis (Jaffrézou et al., 1996
). Additionally, exogenous ceramide can mimic the effects of doxorubicin, and inhibition of ceramide production or protease activation can reduce induction of
apoptosis by doxorubicin treatment (Mansat et al., 1997
). Two additional observations specific to the 8226/Dox cell lines pointed to
defects in apoptotic signaling. First, the antiapoptotic BCLxL is
overexpressed in the 8226/Dox40 cell line compared with RPMI 8226 (Tu
et al., 1998
); and second, 8226/Dox6 and 8226/Dox40 are cross-resistant
to Fas ligand but are Fas-receptor-positive (Landowski et al., 1997
).
In light of these observations, we searched our microarray results for
differentially expressed genes with roles in apoptotic signaling and
execution. Twenty-nine genes with potential involvement in apoptotic
signaling or growth and survival were identified in the list of genes
differentially expressed between RPMI 8226 and 8226/Dox40.
Additionally, 20 of the 29 genes identified in 8226/D40 were also found
in the comparison of RPMI 8226 and 8226/Dox6 (Table
1).
|
Altered Apoptotic Response to Staurosporine in 8226/D40.
The
microarray results indicated that multiple genes involved in apoptosis
signaling were altered in the doxorubicin-selected cell lines. These
results led us to predict that the doxorubicin-selected cell lines
would possess a broad resistance to apoptosis
a phenotype already
hinted at by their resistance to Fas ligand despite expression of the
Fas receptor. To test this hypothesis, we treated RPMI 8226 and
8226/D40 with staurosporine and measured the apoptotic response. The
results graphed in Fig. 4 show that 8226/D40 had an apoptotic response
within 20% of control at both doses of staurosporine, even the high
dose of 500 nM. In contrast, RPMI 8226 shows a progressive increase in
the number of apoptotic cells up to 200% of control at the 500 nM dose
of staurosporine. These results confirm that doxorubicin selection has
led to defects in apoptosis signaling suggested by the changes in gene
expression found using microarrays.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Development of multidrug resistance prevents successful chemotherapy of many tumors, including multiple myeloma. Although drug efflux mechanisms have been shown to play an important role in the multidrug-resistant phenotype, evidence for additional contributing factors led us to use cDNA microarrays to search for differentially expressed genes in the 8226 cell line model of multidrug resistance. By using a model of progressive multidrug resistance, we were able to increase confidence in the microarray analyses by requiring genes to lose or gain expression progressively with increasing doxorubicin resistance. The microarray results identified a subset of differentially expressed genes in the 8226 cell line model that included MDR1. Within the subset of differentially expressed genes, many were of particular interest due to their role in apoptotic signaling, their potential to provide resistance to doxorubicin, and their ability to explain the cross-resistance to Fas ligand seen in the 8226/Dox cells. To confirm the defects in apoptotic signaling suggested by the microarray results, the 8226/D40 cells were compared with RPMI 8226 in their response to staurosporine. 8226/D40 cells were found to be resistant to apoptotic doses of staurosporine as compared with RPMI 8226.
To confirm the microarray results, 30 Northern analyses were performed; of these, 3 could not be interpreted and cast doubt on the differential expression found by microarray analysis. The genes with inconclusive Northern results were glutathione S-transferase, a facilitated glucose transporter, and fibronectin (25, 27, and 28, respectively, in Fig. 2). The Northern analyses of these three genes produced more than three bands of hybridization; the fact that the genes came from large gene families makes cross-hybridization of the probe to multiple homologous sequences a likely explanation. Overall, however, the results of the Northern analyses support the microarray results and indicate that multiple changes in gene expression occurred in response to doxorubicin selection. Furthermore, the Northern analyses that included 8226/Dox6 showed that the changes in gene expression progressed with increasing drug resistance. This correlation between increasing drug resistance and progressive increases or decreases in gene expression provides support for their involvement in the multidrug-resistant phenotype.
The progressive nature of the changes in gene expression suggests they
either play a functional role in doxorubicin resistance directly or are
coordinately regulated with a gene that plays a functional role in
doxorubicin resistance. Previous reports demonstrating that doxorubicin
stimulates apoptosis within the dose range used to select the 8226/Dox
cells (Muller et al., 1997
), that BCLxL expression is altered (Tu et
al., 1998
), and that ceramide is involved in doxorubicin toxicity
(Kolesnick and Krönke, 1998
) suggested that we should find genes
involved in apoptosis and cell survival in the list of differentially
expressed genes. Indeed, 29 genes with potential roles in apoptotic
signaling and execution, especially as mediated by ceramide, were
identified between RPMI 8226 and 8226/D40, 20 of the 29 genes were also
differentially expressed between RPMI 8226 and 8226/Dox6. When viewed
as a whole, the roles the genes listed in Table 1 play in apoptosis and
cell survival suggest that, rather than simply being coordinately
regulated with a resistance gene such as MDR-1, they play a functional
role in the multidrug resistance phenotype. Figure
5 shows a model illustrating how changes
in expression of the genes listed in Table 1 could provide resistance
to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis.
|
Defects in ceramide-mediated apoptotic signaling within the 8226/Dox
cells likely begin with lower availability of inner leaflet sphingomyelin due to lipid translocase activity of MDR1-encoded P-glycoprotein (van Helvoort et al., 1996
). Next, the
doxorubicin-selected cells display a progressive loss of FAN expression
(Fig. 3b; Table 1) that would decrease ligand-bound Fas
receptor-induced N-SMase activation (Adam-Klages et al., 1996
; Kreder
et al., 1999
). Finally, the 8226/Dox cells have altered their
metabolism of arachidonic acid through increased expression of
cyclooxygenase 1. A previous report showed that N-SMase was stimulated
by arachidonic acid when L929 cells were treated with TNF-
(Jayadev
et al., 1994
). The link between arachidonic acid and N-SMase was
further supported when selection for TNF-
resistance led to a loss
of arachidonic acid production (Jayadev et al., 1997
). Thus, the
increase in cyclooxygenase 1 expression observed with increasing
multidrug suggests the 8226/Dox cells increased arachidonic acid
metabolism, thus reducing its stimulatory effect on ceramide
production. Taken together, the 8226/Dox cells have altered expression
of three genes to reduce intracellular levels of the proapoptotic
messenger molecule ceramide.
Scaffidi et al. (1998)
have proposed a categorization for cells'
apoptotic response that provides a framework for viewing the changes in
8226/Dox ceramide signaling pathway. They defined two cell types based
on formation of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) following
Fas ligand binding and involvement of the mitochondria in Fas
ligand-induced apoptosis. Type I cells activate caspase 8, and
subsequently caspase 3, via DISC formation within seconds to minutes of
Fas ligand binding. In type I cells, a ceramide-activated,
BCL-2/BCLxL-inhibitable mitochondrial permeability transition is
secondary. Conversely, type II cells do not appear to activate caspases
directly. Instead, the apoptotic signal must travel through the
ceramide-triggered mitochondrial permeability transition, with the
resulting release of cytochrome c and activation of caspase
3. In addition, activation of caspase 3 in type II cells is delayed at
least 30 min or more. When RPMI 8226 cells were treated with 5 µM
doxorubicin, activated caspase 8 and caspase 3 fragments did not appear
for 4 to 8 h, an indication that doxorubicin likely uses a
DISC-independent mechanism of apoptosis induction in 8226 cells
(Landowski et al., 1999
). Thus, 8226 cells appear to be in the type II
category of slow caspase activation that proceeds via a
ceramide-signaled mitochondrial permeability transition. Based on this
model for doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in 8226 cells, altered
expression of genes involved with ceramide signaling takes on
additional significance.
In addition to genes whose products alter ceramide production, multiple
downstream targets of ceramide were affected by doxorubicin selection.
Ceramide signaling has been shown to proceed through a
ceramide-activated kinase pathway involving the sequential activation of the ceramide target KSR/CAPK, Ras, Raf, and MEK and finally, activation of BAD via Akt (Basu et al., 1998
). Two members of this ceramide-activated kinase pathway, Raf and BAD (Fig. 5), had lower
expression in the doxorubicin resistant cells. BAD works to promote
apoptosis by forming a heterodimer with, and inactivating, the
antiapoptotic protein BCLxL, which has been previously reported to be
up-regulated in the 8226/Dox40 cell line (Tu et al., 1998
). Taken
together, the simultaneous reduction of Raf and BAD in coordination with increased BCLxL expression could provide a potent dampening of
ceramide-mediated apoptosis signaling and further indicates a role for
mitochondria permeability transition-dependent (type II) apoptosis in
doxorubicin toxicity.
In addition to the ceramide arm of apoptotic signaling, there were
changes in expression of two caspases responsible for initiation and
execution of apoptosis, caspase 8/MACH/FLICE and caspase
3/CPP32, respectively. Caspase 8/Mach/FLICE binds the Fas/CD95 receptor via Fas-associated death domain and is activated by DISC
formation. Caspase 8/Mach/FLICE is the induction caspase in Fas-induced
apoptosis and is important to the activation of the Fas-signaled
caspase cascade (Susin et al., 1997
). Our microarray results
also indicated decreased expression of the proapoptotic molecule
caspase-like apoptosis-regulatory protein (CLARP) (Inohara et al.,
1997
), and the CED-4 homologous protein FLASH in the 8226/D40
cell line. Both CLARP and FLASH are thought to be involved in formation
of the DISC and subsequent activation of caspase 8; thus, their
decreased expression in conjunction with the previously reported
reduction of caspase 8 expression in 8226/Dox40 (Landowski et al.,
1999
) could operate to reduce activation of the caspase cascade in the 8226/Dox cells. Decreased expression of DISC components argues against
the designation of 8226 cells as type II; however, it should be kept in
mind that the cell types defined by Scaffidi et al. (1998)
refer to
induction of apoptosis by Fas ligand. Nonphysiological inducers of
apoptosis such as doxorubicin may trigger both type I and type II
signaling from multiple points within the signaling cascades. This
possibility is even more intriguing in light of the numerous disputed
reports of doxorubicin and other chemotherapeutics triggering Fas/CD95
receptor and Fas ligand transcription and subsequent apoptosis in an
autocrine fashion. Alternatively, the reduction in CLARP and FLASH
expression may reflect their coregulation with caspase 8.
The downstream effector caspase critical to execution of either type I
or type II apoptosis appears to be caspase 3, which can be activated by
caspase 8 or as a result of the mitochondrial permeability transition.
With the convergence of both type I and type II apoptotic signaling at
caspase 3, the progressive loss of caspase 3 expression (Fig. 3g) with
increasing doxorubicin resistance may represent a critical defect in
the apoptotic pathway in cells with a multidrug-resistant phenotype.
The importance of caspase 3 is supported by the finding that
doxorubicin-treated CEM cells activated caspases 1 and 3 and
subsequently cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. In addition,
CEM cells selected with 172 nM doxorubicin are analogous to the
82226/D40 cells in that they are also cross-resistant to Fas ligand
(Los et al., 1997
). The exact mechanism(s) by which doxorubicin
stimulates cells in a manner similar to natural death receptor ligands
such as TNF-
and Fas ligand is unknown; however, it should be noted
that in both the CEM cells used by Los et al. and the 8226 cells of
this study apoptosis was significantly delayed as compared with Fas ligand induction (Los et al., 1997
; Landowski et al., 1999
). The delayed cell death and caspase activation produced by doxorubicin in
comparison with Fas ligand serves to warn of a limit to which the
analogy of doxorubicin with Fas ligand can be used. Regardless of how
doxorubicin or other chemotherapeutics affected by multidrug resistance
activate endogenous apoptotic signaling pathways, the downstream
defects in ceramide and caspase activation found in the 8226/Dox cells
likely limit their ability to cause cell death via apoptosis (Fig.
5).
|
Recent work has supported a vital role for apoptosis in chemotherapy. The results presented here using a multidrug-resistant cell line model indicate that along with drug efflux mechanisms, multiple changes to apoptosis signaling occurred as a result of doxorubicin selection. Future studies into the commonality of the changes observed in the 8226 cell line model should lead to a more refined multidrug resistance fingerprint and new commonly affected targets for reversing of the multidrug-resistant phenotype.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This article is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Sydney E. Salmon, founder of the Arizona Cancer Center. Dr. Salmon's support and encouragement enabled development of microarray technology at the Arizona Cancer Center and made this study possible.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication July 24, 2001.
Received for publication May 23, 2001.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health T32 CA 09213, Core Grant 3P30CA23074-19 (to the Arizona Cancer Center), and CA65662 (to B.W.F.).
Address correspondence to: George S. Watts, Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724. E-mail: gwatts{at}azcc.arizona.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
D40, Dox40; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SSC, standard saline citrate; FAN, neutral sphingomyelinase-activating protein; CAPK, ceramide-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; KSR, kinase suppressor of ras; JNK, c-jun N-terminal kinase; N-SMase, neutral sphingomyelinase; BAD, BCL-2 antagonist of cell death; DISC, death-inducing signaling complex; CLARP, caspase-like apoptosis-regulatory protein.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced ceramide generation in L929 cells.
J Biol Chem
272:
17196-17203
apoptosis and oxidative DNA damage.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
230:
254-257[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-Y. Liu, J. Y. Yu, D. Yin, G. A. Patwardhan, V. Gupta, Y. Hirabayashi, W. M. Holleran, A. E. Giuliano, S. M. Jazwinski, V. Gouaze-Andersson, et al. A role for ceramide in driving cancer cell resistance to doxorubicin FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2541 - 2551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Gillet, T. Efferth, D. Steinbach, J. Hamels, F. de Longueville, V. Bertholet, and J. Remacle Microarray-based Detection of Multidrug Resistance in Human Tumor Cells by Expression Profiling of ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Genes Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 8987 - 8993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mahadevan and A. F. List Targeting the multidrug resistance-1 transporter in AML: molecular regulation and therapeutic strategies Blood, October 1, 2004; 104(7): 1940 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Sappal, A. K. McClendon, J. A. Fleming, V. Thoroddsen, K. Connolly, C. Reimer, R. K. Blackman, C. E. Bulawa, N. Osheroff, P. Charlton, et al. Biological characterization of MLN944: A potent DNA binding agent Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2004; 3(1): 47 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Babbar, N. A. Ignatenko, R. A. Casero Jr., and E. W. Gerner Cyclooxygenase-independent Induction of Apoptosis by Sulindac Sulfone Is Mediated by Polyamines in Colon Cancer J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47762 - 47775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Aleman, J.-P. Annereau, X.-J. Liang, C. O. Cardarelli, B. Taylor, J. J. Yin, A. Aszalos, and M. M. Gottesman P-Glycoprotein, Expressed in Multidrug Resistant Cells, Is Not Responsible for Alterations in Membrane Fluidity or Membrane Potential Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3084 - 3091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Lamendola, Z. Duan, R. Z. Yusuf, and M. V. Seiden Molecular Description of Evolving Paclitaxel Resistance in the SKOV-3 Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Line Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 63(9): 2200 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Burger, J. A. Foekens, M. P. Look, M. E. Meijer-van Gelder, J. G. M. Klijn, E. A. C. Wiemer, G. Stoter, and K. Nooter RNA Expression of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein, Lung Resistance-related Protein, Multidrug Resistance-associated Proteins 1 and 2, and Multidrug Resistance Gene 1 in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Chemotherapeutic Response Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 827 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||