![]() |
|
|
Vol. 299, Issue 1, 358-365, October 2001
ková
Immunology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The receptor for platelet-activating factor (PAFR) is a member of the G
protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. According to the allosteric
ternary complex model, GPCRs exist in an equilibrium between different
conformations. Agonist binding promotes and stabilizes the receptor in
an active conformation. On the other hand, ligands that stabilize the
inactive conformation are known as inverse agonists. Due to the
association of platelet-activating factor (PAF) with diverse
physiological and pathological processes, considerable efforts have
been invested in the development of antagonists to PAFR. A large number
of these molecules has been shown to specifically interact with PAFR
but, surprisingly, little is known about their impact on the
conformation of the receptor and its activity. By using a
constitutively active mutant (L231R) of the human PAFR and by
transiently coexpressing the wild-type (WT) receptor with the
G
q subunit of the trimeric G protein, we were
able to address this issue with ligands of diverse structures such as
phospholipids, benzodiazepines, furans, and others. We demonstrated
that some of these molecules are potent inverse agonists. For example,
when cells (WT PAFR + G
q) were exposed to WEB2086, SM10661, or alprazolam, the basal inositol phosphate production was
reduced by 53 ± 6, 44 ± 3, and 54 ± 4%,
respectively. The decrease in basal inositol phosphate production by
WEB2086 was significantly inhibited by a more neutral antagonist
BN52021, confirming the specificity of the reaction. We demonstrate
here that WEB2086 and other known ligands previously considered as antagonists can act as inverse agonists on the human PAF receptor.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Platelet-activating
factor (PAF) is a potent phospholipid mediator released from many cell
types, including stimulated basophils, platelets, macrophages, and
polymorphonuclear neutrophils. PAF is involved in a variety of
biological activities related to inflammatory and immune responses as
well as cardiovascular, respiratory, and nervous system physiology
(Braquet and Rola-Pleszczynski, 1987
). PAF structural requirements are
highly specific for its biological actions, which are mediated through
binding and activation of a specific, high-affinity receptor on the
target cell surface. cDNA cloning from various sources revealed that
the PAF receptor (PAFR) belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor
(GPCR) family (Nakamura et al., 1991
; Ye et al., 1991
; Sugimoto et al.,
1992
; Kunz et al., 1992
; Chase et al., 1993
). PAFR signaling is linked to various second messenger systems, through phospholipase
A2, C, and D activation (Prescott et al., 1990
;
Kuruvilla et al., 1993
; Liu et al., 1994
). This receptor is also known
to induce the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and the Jak/STAT pathway in some cells (Franklin et al., 1993
; Honda et al., 1994
; Liu
et al., 1994
; Franklin et al., 1995
; Lukashova et al., 2001
). PAF-dependent cell activation can be inhibited by a variety of structurally distinct molecules (Hwang, 1990
). The ligands tested in
this study were related to different families of molecules such as
benzodiazepines, alprazolam (Kornechi et al., 1984
) and WEB2086
(Casals-Stenzel et al., 1987
); PAF analogs, CV3988 (Terashita et al.,
1985
) and
1-O-hexadecyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(N,N,N-trimethyl)hexanolamine (hexanolamine) (Grigoriadis and Stewart, 1991
); ginkgolides, BN52021 (Nunez et al., 1986
); and others such as SM10661 (Komuro et al., 1990
),
octylonium bromide (Subissi et al., 1989
), and FR49175 (Okamoto et al.,
1986
).
It has been established that many GPCRs can exist in a spontaneously
active form in the absence of agonist (Costa et al., 1992
; Lefkowitz et
al., 1993
; Chidiac et al., 1994
). This agonist-independent activity has
mostly been observed in cell lines or transgenic mice in which
receptors were overexpressed or mutated (Adie and Milligan, 1994
;
Barker et al., 1994
; Chidiac et al., 1994
; Bond et al., 1995
;
Newman-Tancredi et al., 1997
). In the PAFR, a substitution of leucine
231 of the third intracellular loop to an arginine (L231R) stabilizes
the active form and leads, in COS 7 cells, to a significant increase in
the basal production of inositol phosphates (IP) (Parent et al.,
1996a
). In a previous study, we also reported that COS 7 cells
coexpressing the wild-type (WT) PAFR and a G protein-uncoupled mutant
D63N (a substitution of aspartate 63 to an asparagine) at a ratio of
three D63N mutants to one WT receptor exhibited higher basal levels of
inositol phosphates than WT or D63N expressed alone (Le Gouill et al.,
1999
). Unlike the constitutively active mutant L231R, however, the 1WT + 3D63N complex did not respond to PAF in terms of increased IP production.
Constitutively active mutant receptors have been a valuable tool to demonstrate that certain ligands stabilize inactive conformations. These ligands are known as inverse agonists, because they have the opposite effect of agonists. Until now, most of the PAFR ligands were loosely classified as antagonists, thus as molecules that interfere with the agonist (PAF) activation of the receptor. In this study, we characterize the effects of these molecules on the activated state of the PAFR to define which ones have inverse agonist, partial agonist, or neutral antagonist (no effect on activation) properties.
By either expressing the combination WT/G
q,
WT/D63N (1:3 ratio), or the L231R mutant of PAFR, we also studied
whether the properties of the ligands would vary depending on the
structural conditions leading to the constitutive activation of PAFR.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Alprazolam, BN52021, (±)-trans-2,5-bis(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-1,3-dioxolane (dioxolane), enantio-PAF, FR49175, hexanolamine, octylonium bromide, SM10661, and PAF were from BIOMOL (Plymouth Meeting, PA). WEB2086 was from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (Ingelheim, Germany). CV3988 was from Takeda Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan.
Cell Culture and Transfections. COS 7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium high glucose (Invitrogen Canada, Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Bio Media Canada, Drummondville QC, Canada) and transfected using FuGENE-6 (Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Cells were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well in six-well plates and the following day, transfected exactly as instructed in Roche's protocol, by using 2 µl of FuGENE-6 and 1 µg of DNA. Experiments were carried out 2 days after transfection.
Radioligand Binding Assay.
[3H]WEB2086 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences
Products, Boston, MA) binding reactions were performed, as
previously described by Parent et al. (1996a)
, on COS 7 cells
transfected with DNA encoding a c-myc epitope-tagged (N
terminus) WT PAFR in pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, cells
were harvested, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
resuspended in HEPES-Tyrode's buffer (140 nM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1 mM
CaCl2, 12 mM NaHCO3, 5.6 mM
D-glucose, 0.49 mM MgCl2,
0.37 mM NaH2PO4, 25 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4) containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. The binding
assays were done on 5 × 104 cells in a
total volume of 0.25 ml of the same buffer, containing 10 nM
[3H]WEB2086, at room temperature for 90 min. In
some experiments, different antagonists were also included in the mix
to compete with the radioligand binding on the receptor. Binding
reactions were stopped by centrifugation. The cell-associated
radioactivity was measured by liquid
scintillation.
|
Inositol Phosphate Determination.
COS 7 cells were
cotransfected, as indicated in Figs. 1 and
2, with DNA encoding the
q subunit of the human trimeric Gq protein and
either a c-myc epitope tagged (N terminus) WT and/or a
mutant receptor (L231R or D63N). The following day, cells were labeled for 18 to 24 h with 5 µCi/ml of
[3H]myoinositol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, NJ) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (high glucose,
without inositol) (Invitrogen). After labeling, they were washed once
with PBS and preincubated for 45 min at room temperature in presence of
different PAF antagonists. LiCl was then added at a final concentration of 10 mM and cells incubated in presence or absence of 10 nM PAF, at
37°C. The reaction was terminated after 30 min by the addition of
perchloric acid. After an incubation of 30 min on ice, inositol phosphates were extracted and separated on Dowex AG1-X8 columns (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as previously described (Parent et al., 1996b
).
3H-Labeled inositol phosphate levels were then
evaluated by liquid scintillation.
|
Receptor Sequestration. The evaluation of receptor sequestration was done on COS 7 cells transiently expressing a c-myc epitope-tagged (N terminus) WT receptor. Cells were exposed or not to different PAFR ligands at 37°C for 30 min in HEPES-Tyrode's buffer. They were then harvested, washed with PBS, and incubated at 16°C with or without anti-c-myc antibody (clone 9E10; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). After 90 min, cells were washed with PBS and incubated for an additional hour with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). Receptor expression on the cell surface was then evaluated using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Oakville, ON, Canada).
Statistical significance was established with Student's t test.| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To further amplify the effect of the activated state of PAFR on
inositol phosphate levels, COS 7 cells were also transfected with the
cDNA of the human G
q. Other members of the
q family were tested
(G
11, G
14,
G
16) but their effect on basal inositol phosphate production was lower than with G
q.
With this increase in basal activity, we were able to use the WT
receptor to test both antagonists' and inverse agonists' properties
of various ligands.
Efficiency of PAF Antagonists.
COS 7 cells expressing WT PAFR
and G
q stimulated with
10
7 M PAF were used to confirm the antagonist
activity of indicated compounds (Fig. 1). The concentrations chosen for
these experiments were approximately 30-fold their reported
IC50 for diverse biological responses to PAF.
Although these compounds are all PAFR ligands, because they interfered
with [3H]WEB2086 binding (Fig. 2) or
[3H]PAF (data not shown), some of them, FR49175
(2.6 × 10
4 M) and dioxolane (1 × 10
5 M), did not antagonize PAF-induced inositol
phosphate production in COS 7 cells. On the other hand, CV3988
(1.6 × 10
4 M), octylonium bromide
(2.4 × 10
4 M), hexanolamine (1.1 × 10
5 M), WEB2086 (1 × 10
4 M), and enantio-PAF (1 × 10
5 M) were all efficient antagonists, reducing
the level of PAF-induced inositol phosphate production to 4 ± 6, 12 ± 16, 11 ± 12, 17 ± 8, and 20 ± 21% of
maximal response, respectively. Others, such as BN 52021 (7 × 10
5 M), alprazolam (4.2 × 10
4 M), and SM10661 (1.2 × 10
4 M) showed weak antagonist properties by
only reducing response to PAF to levels of 54 ± 8, 66 ± 10, and 70 ± 11%, respectively.
Basal Inositol Phosphate Production.
COS 7 cells expressing WT + G
q, L231R, or 1WT+ 3D63N were used for the
following experiments. The increased basal level of inositol phosphate
production in these cells was essential to examine a wide range of PAF
antagonists for their potential inverse agonist activity. Table
1 shows levels of basal inositol
phosphate production by constitutively active mutants compared with
levels induced by stimulation of the WT receptor with
10
6 M PAF.
|
q (Fig. 3, A and B). With the
constitutively active mutant receptor L231R, the basal levels of
inositol phosphates were reduced by 51 ± 4, 50 ± 3, 57 ± 4, and 42 ± 4%, with the same compounds, respectively.
However, these ligands had a much weaker inverse agonist effect on
cells expressing the 1WT + 3D63N receptor combination. The basal level
of inositol phosphate production was inhibited by 17 ± 1, 32 ± 7, 22 ± 1, and 19 ± 1% for dioxolane, SM10661,
alprazolam, and WEB2086, respectively. Hexanolamine has been reported
to act as a partial agonist (Grigoriadis and Stewart, 1991
q protein (Fig. 3C). A much smaller increase
was seen in cells expressing the constitutively active receptors.
Extended concentration-response curves for WEB2086, alprazolam, and
CV3988, which exhibited efficient inverse agonist activity, were
compared in cells coexpressing WT + G
q and
showed that WEB2086 is a more potent inverse agonist than either CV3988
or alprazolam (Fig. 3D).
|
7 M PAF,
hexanolamine, and enantio-PAF demonstrated a slightly lower inositol
phosphate production corresponding to 80 and 94% respectively, of PAF
stimulation in cells overexpressing WT + G
q
(data not shown). In presence of the L231R constitutively active
mutant, hexanolamine and enantio-PAF induced IP production
corresponding to 49 and 39% of PAF stimulation. In cells expressing
1WT + 3D63N, 10
7 M PAF, hexanolamine, and enantio-PAF all
demonstrated a very modest increase of IP production corresponding to
167, 186, and 154% of basal level of inositol phosphate production
(data not shown).
To determine whether the relative unresponsiveness of the 1WT + 3D63N
receptor complex was concentration-dependent, we treated cells
expressing this complex or coexpressing WT + G
q with graded concentrations of selected
ligands (Fig. 4). WEB2086, SM10661, and
dioxolane induced a concentration-dependent reduction of basal inositol
phosphate levels in cells transfected with the WT receptor and
G
q. However, in cells with the 1WT + 3D63N
receptor combination, the inositol phosphate levels remained relatively
unaffected by increasing concentrations of these ligands.
|
q with BN52021, which was one of the
compounds closest to a neutral agonist (20% decrease in basal IP
production; Fig. 3A), followed by stimulation with WEB2086 (Fig.
5). Although WEB2086 demonstrated 51 ± 2% inhibition of basal IP production, pretreatment with BN52021
significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the WEB2086-induced reduction of inositol phosphate production.
|
Receptor Sequestration.
After ligand binding to the receptor,
a cascade of events often leads to sequestration of the receptor from
cell surface. Because lower numbers of cell-surface receptors could
produce the same phenomenon of decreased basal activity as inverse
agonists, we examined whether indicated molecules induced an
accelerated internalization of the receptor. Receptor expression on the
cell surface was assessed using flow cytometry. As shown in Fig.
6, only hexanolamine, which has partial
agonist activity, was able to induce PAFR internalization at a level
(85 ± 42%) comparable with that induced by the agonist PAF
(10
7 M). The other compounds induced a much
lower level of receptor internalization.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been shown in the context of several GPCRs that certain
molecules could act as inverse agonists and reduce the levels of
spontaneous receptor activity and functional cellular responses (Chidiac et al., 1994
; Samama et al., 1994
; Shryock et al., 1998
; Spadoni et al., 1998
). Here, we report that molecules known to antagonize diverse responses to PAF can also inhibit spontaneous activity of PAFR. The antagonists characterized in this study included
families of molecules of unrelated structure such as benzodiazepines
(alprazolam and WEB2086), PAF analogs (CV3988 and hexanolamine),
ginkgolides (BN52021), and other families. Until now, none of these
antagonists had been examined for their inverse agonist properties. The
structural diversity of these molecules suggested a possible variety of
properties, and we therefore decided to characterize one or two members
of each family.
Benzodiazepines were more efficient at reducing the levels of constitutive activity of PAF WT and mutant receptors. SM10661 and dioxolane, members of the diaryl tetrahydrofurane family, also reduced constitutively active receptor signaling, demonstrating a decrease of approximately 50% of inositol phosphate production. Among the other antagonists assayed, octylonium bromide, a very good antagonist, did not act as an inverse agonist. Others, such as FR49175 or dioxolane, were less capable of competing with PAF for a binding site on the receptor but demonstrated inverse agonist activity. These molecules may be interacting less tightly with the receptor, which would facilitate their displacement by PAF, or may not bind to the receptor at the same site as PAF, which would make them less effective antagonists but maintain their capacity for inverse agonist activity.
A two-state equilibrium model of receptors can illustrate the inverse
agonist activity of certain ligands. Many GPCRs can be spontaneously
active, suggesting a two-state conformation, an equilibrium between
active and inactive conformational states in the absence of agonist
(Leff, 1995
; Milligan et al., 1995
; Leurs et al., 1998
). Agonist
binding to the receptor alters the equilibrium, favors the active state
of the receptor, and helps in stabilizing this conformation. In the
absence of an agonist, neutral antagonists do not stabilize
preferentially either of the two conformations. Compounds displaying
inverse agonism should have a higher affinity for the inactive state
compared with the active conformation, resulting in a decrease in the
proportion of receptors in an active conformation and a reduction in
the basal activation of effector mechanisms. This has been suggested for the
2-adrenoreceptor, that inverse
agonists would have a preferential affinity for the R form of the
receptor over the R* state (Samama et al., 1994
). On the other hand,
in the case of opiate receptors, it has been proposed that the
compounds with inverse agonist activity have a preferential affinity
for the free receptor over the receptor-G protein complex and thus
suppress agonist-independent activity (Costa et al., 1992
). Our results indicate that a molecule described as having an inverse agonist activity for a certain receptor conformation will not necessarily demonstrate the same activity for another type of receptor structure, as shown here with the L231R mutant receptor and the 1WT + 3D63N constitutively active complex, where ligands with inverse agonist activity on the L231R did not decrease the IP production by the 1WT + 3D63N complex.
The overexpression of WT + G
q or the
constitutively active receptor (L231R) both conserve their potential to
respond to agonist activation, whereas the combination of WT and D63N
produces a receptor complex that has a different phenotype from both
the WT and D63N expressed alone (Le Gouill et al., 1999
). We have shown
that when the WT and D63N are expressed at a 1:1 ratio, this complex
has higher basal IP production and has a potentiated response to PAF in
comparison with WT alone. Although the complex composed of 1:3 ratio
has high basal IP production, it no longer responds adequately to PAF,
indicating that this complex has acquired some rigidity and the agonist
can no longer induce a conformational change needed for the appropriate
activation of effector mechanisms. This resistance to conformational
change could also result in the lack of response of this constitutively
active receptor complex to the inverse agonists, which were active in
decreasing basal IP production by the WT + G
q
and L231R receptors. This could explain the major differences in
activity displayed by the two models of constitutively active
receptors. Similarly, a mutant of the H2 receptor, which had a limited
response to histamine, also failed to respond to an inverse agonist in
the same manner as the WT receptor (Smit et al., 1996
)
We also studied whether the decrease in signaling by inverse agonists
could be attributed to an increased sequestration of the receptors from
the cell surface. It had been shown that inverse agonists could induce
the internalization of the cholecystokininA receptor (Roettger et al., 1997
), although in the majority of the cases
studied, modulation of receptor expression by inverse agonists, when
present, tended to increase cell surface expression of the receptors
(Smit et al., 1996
). We showed that all the potent inverse agonists
(alprazolam, WEB2086, SM10661, and dioxolane) induced low levels of
receptor sequestration, comparable with less potent ones. The only
compounds that induced an increase in PAFR sequestration were the
partial agonist hexanolamine and the agonist PAF, which had been shown
previously to induce PAFR sequestration (Le Gouill et al., 1997
). These
results indicate that the decrease in basal activity induced by
selected ligands is not due to an accelerated rate of receptor internalization.
In this work, we demonstrated that dioxolane, WEB2086, alprazolam, and
SM10661 have potent inverse agonist activity on constitutively active
receptors overexpressed in COS 7 cells. These inverse agonists all
induce a decrease in inositol phosphate production, without changing
the receptor sequestration rate. Our results also demonstrate that the
inverse agonist effect of WEB2086 can be significantly inhibited by a
more neutral antagonist such as BN52021. By comparing WT coexpressed
with G
q, 3D63N coexpressed with 1WT, and L231R mutant PAF receptors, we demonstrated that inverse agonist activity can
differ from one constitutively active receptor to another. This could
be explained by conformational differences in the receptor binding
sites and may indicate that a molecule known for its inverse agonist
activity will not necessarily have the same activity on a mutant
receptor. Studies of the relationship between ligand structure and
their properties may make it possible to predict secondary effects of
some of these molecules in therapy and to develop new molecules with
the desired characteristics, such as ligands that can induce short- or
long-term desensitization without inducing an effector cascade.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. Richard Ye (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) for the kind gift of the PAFR cDNA, and Denis Gingras for technical assistance.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication July 3, 2001.
Received for publication April 30, 2001.
1 Current address: Department of Anesthesiology and Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
Address correspondence to: Jana Sta
ková,
Immunology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine,
Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada.
E-mail: stankova{at}courrier.usherb.ca
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PAF, platelet-activating factor; PAFR, platelet-activating factor receptor; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; IP, inositol phosphate; WT, wild-type; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptor.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
390-394[Abstract].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Cheng, W. Cao, C. Fiocchi, J. Behar, P. Biancani, and K. M. Harnett HCl-induced inflammatory mediators in cat esophageal mucosa and inflammatory mediators in esophageal circular muscle in an in vitro model of esophagitis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): G1307 - G1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Dupre, C. Le Gouill, D. Gingras, M. Rola-Pleszczynski, and J. Stankova Inverse Agonist Activity of Selected Ligands of the Cysteinyl-Leukotriene Receptor 1 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 102 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kenakin Efficacy as a Vector: the Relative Prevalence and Paucity of Inverse Agonism Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||