![]() |
|
|
Vol. 299, Issue 1, 277-289, October 2001
Division of Neuropharmacology, Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A receptor is an important component of the neural substrates underlying ethanol (EtOH) intake and behaviors related to anxiety and stress. Paradoxically, both 5-HT2A agonists and antagonists have been shown to reduce EtOH intake, however the mechanisms underlying these effects are not understood. This inconsistency could possibly be explained by their chronic down-regulation of the 5-HT2A receptor. To further address these findings, the present study sought to functionally characterize the role of localized 5-HT2A receptors in regulating EtOH ingestion by producing central nervous system site-specific receptor down-regulation through infusion of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO). Rats were infused with 5-HT2A receptor ASO into the lateral ventricle (i.c.v.), prefrontal cortex (PFC), central amygdaloid nucleus, medial and lateral division (CeA/L), dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), or hippocampus (HIP) for a period of 26 days. Subjects were tested for EtOH intake and behaviors related to anxiety and stress. ASO administration i.c.v. and into the CeA/L significantly reduced EtOH intake. PFC 5-HT2A ASO administration increased EtOH intake. Administration of 5-HT2A ASO into the DRN and HIP had no effect on EtOH intake. Intracerebroventricular ASO administration increased activity in a novel open field and increased anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze. PFC ASO administration produced an anxiogenic effect in the elevated plus maze. Intracerbroventricular, PFC, and CeA/L ASO infusions altered adrenocortical function. These differential behavioral effects specific to the anatomical locations targeted for 5-HT2A receptor down-regulation may help resolve a long-standing, apparent inconsistency in the role of 5-HT2A receptors in EtOH consumption.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
central 5-HT system is a viable target for the pharmacotherapeutic
treatment of alcoholism and alcohol abuse. Moderate success in reducing
EtOH intake at both the preclinical and clinical level has been
achieved through the use of selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, which
are also effective in treating anxiety and stress disorders (Naranjo et
al., 1990
; Knapp et al., 1993
; McBride et al., 1993
). Additionally, the
comorbidity of psychological disorders related to stress and anxiety
has long been reported to exist in many subpopulations of alcoholics,
and in many cases are thought to contribute to the etiology and/or
maintenance of alcoholism. Interestingly, several of the compounds used
to treat alcoholism and alcohol abuse are also effective at treating
anxiety and depression. One common pharmacological effect that many of
these compounds produce is a down-regulation of the
5-HT2A receptor, and this receptor has been
specifically implicated in mediating EtOH intake (Overstreet et al.,
1997
; Wilson et al., 1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
).
Interestingly, both 5-HT2A agonists and partial
agonists such as DOI and 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine (Pohorecky
et al., 1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
), and 5-HT2A
antagonists such as amperozide, FG 5974, MDL 100,907, mianserin, and
ritanserin (Meert and Janssen, 1991
; Meyers et al., 1993
; Pohorecky et
al., 1998
; Roberts et al., 1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
) are capable of
reducing EtOH consumption. Several factors, however, must be considered
in the interpretation of these findings. First, it cannot be
ascertained that 5-HT2A ligands that affect
EtOH-related behaviors work predominately through the
5-HT2A site, because these compounds generally
show at least some pharmacological activity at other 5-HT receptors (Di
Giovanni et al., 1999
; Gobert and Millan, 1999
). Second, reductions in
EtOH intake produced by 5-HT2A drugs are not only
dose-related but also seem to vary across strain (including genetically
preferring animal models) (Overstreet et al., 1997
), drinking paradigm
used (Roberts et al., 1998
), and the subject's basal EtOH
intake prior to testing (Meert and Janssen, 1991
).
It is also not known which CNS structures are the most dominant in the
5-HT2A receptor's mediation of EtOH intake, or
stress- and anxiety-related behaviors. 5-HT2A
receptors are found with highest density in the PFC, the piriform
cortex, and the claustrum (Pazos et al., 1985
). Additionally,
5-HT2A receptors are located in several
structures associated with reward and reinforcement pathways, as well
as with some structures associated with stress and anxiety, such as the
PFC, amygdala, DRN, and HIP.
Given that many of the ligands that have a pharmacological profile for
the 5-HT2A receptor also show pharmacological
activity at other 5-HT receptors, new methods of selectively
attenuating activity of the 5-HT2A receptor would
be valuable in clarifying its role in EtOH-related behaviors. The use
of ASO has now made it possible to selectively inhibit expression of
specific subpopulations of the 5-HT receptor family. ASO treatment is
emerging as a viable technology, capable of providing anatomic and
mechanistic data for the validation of drug targets (Bennet and
Cowsert, 1999
). The present studies used chronically administered
phosphodiester-backbone ASO, to the 5'-untranslated region of the mRNA
coding for the 5-HT2A receptor to produce brain
area-specific down-regulation of 5-HT2A
receptors. This allows for down-regulation of the
5-HT2A receptor in a manner analogous to that
following pharmacological treatment (Sibille et al., 1997
), but with
much greater selectivity than 5-HT2A antagonists.
The current experiments were designed as a set of initial behavioral studies using ASO technology. The primary focus of these investigations was to more accurately identify and define the specific CNS structures in which the 5-HT2A receptor may mediate both voluntary EtOH intake and the behavioral responses to acutely administered EtOH. Given that the 5-HT2A receptor has also been linked to anxiety and stress disorders, and these may be related to alcoholism and alcohol abuse, a secondary objective of this study was to further elucidate the role of this receptor in behaviors that are thought to be valid indexes of stress and anxiety in rats. Such testing included measurements of spontaneously occurring behaviors in the open field and the elevated plus maze.
Rats were implanted with osmotic minipumps and ASO directed at the 5-HT2A receptor was infused into localized brain sites for a period of 26 days during which time behavioral testing was conducted. The results from the present study indicate that the 5-HT2A receptor both positively and negatively regulates EtOH consumption and the direction of change in EtOH consumption varies depending upon the neuroanatomical location of these receptors.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
A total of 80 male Long Evans rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used in the subsequent experiments. Subjects were individually housed in wire mesh hanging cages with Rodent Chow (Purina, St. Louis, MO) and tap water available ad libitum. Subjects were approximately 8 weeks old and 225 g on arrival. Vivaria were maintained at a temperature of 23 ± 1°C and lights were maintained on a 12-h light/dark schedule with lights on at 8:00 PM, so all behavioral testing could be conducted during the dark phase of the light cycle to avoid disruption of the biological circadian rhythm. All animals were tested between 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM. Subjects were allowed 2 weeks to habituate to the colony rooms prior to testing. All testing procedures were in compliance with National Institutes of Health and Rutgers University guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Oligonucleotide Design and Preparation
The ASO sequence was a phosphodiester oligonucleotide, 22 bases in length. This sequence, 5' AGT CAT TAT GGT AGA GCC TCG G 3',
corresponded to the 5'-untranslated region of the
5-HT2A receptor mRNA, and did not share
significant homology with any known sequence according to a gene
databank search (GenBank). A control sequence with the same
s-oligonucleotide base composition, 5' TCT CAT TAT GGT AGA GCC TGC C
3', was also tested to ensure that the sequence was producing a
specific effect in the stability and translational efficiency of the
5-HT2A receptor mRNA, and not merely a
nonspecific toxic effect. Thermodynamic comparisons of hybridization
rates between the ASO and MSO sequences revealed that the free energy generated by bond formation in physiological buffer was
24.88 kcal/mol for ASO and
17.95 kcal/mol for MSO (Peyret et al.,
1999
; HYTHER shareware, www.JSL1.chem.wayne.edu), suggesting
that hybridization affinities for ASO to target were vastly greater
than the MSO to target. The ASO was diluted in nuclease-free
H2O (10 µg/3 µl) and then injected into an
Alzet 2004 osmotic minipump (Alza Corporation, Palo Alto, CA). The pump
flow rate was 0.25 µl/h allowing for the infusion of a dose of 20 µg of oligonucleotide per 24 h, and the maximum life of the pump
was 28 days. However, all experiments were stopped, and animals
sacrificed on, day 26 postpump implant. It was theorized that the
behavioral effects of the antisense would not be seen until
approximately 48 h post-ASO administration given that the
half-life of the 5-HT2A receptor is estimated at 2.5 days. At the conclusion of each experiment residual
oligonucleotide solution from the minipumps was analyzed against an
aliquot that had been kept at
70°C for 1 month. For this, agarose
gels (1.2%) were used and samples were electrophoresed at 85 V for 30 min, and then bands were visualized using ethidium bromide
fluorescence. Bands from control or experimental samples were compared
for concentration and integrity. Loss of oligonucleotide was never more
than 5%, and smaller molecular weight bands or ladders (evidence of
oligonucleotide degradation) were not detected.
Surgical Procedures
All surgery was performed under sterile conditions. Rats were
anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine combination and placed in a
stereotaxic apparatus. A 2-cm incision anterior to the scapula was made
and two subcutaneous pockets were created. A single pump was then
placed into each cavity. Polyethylene tubing attached to the pumps was
threaded under the skin up to the site of cannula implantation. Rats
were then bilaterally implanted with delivery cannula (22 gauge;
Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) targeted to the area of interest and secured
with cranioplastic cement and three stainless steel screws.
Implantation sites were based upon coordinates taken from Paxinos and
Watson (1986)
. Stereotaxic coordinates for the lateral ventricle, PFC,
CeA/L, DRN, and HIP, respectively, are presented as anteroposterior,
mediolateral, dorsoventral: +1.0, ±1.5,
3.5; +3.2, ±1.5,
0.7;
2.3, ±4.2,
7.6;
7.8, 3.25,
6.75 (15° angle);
4.8, ±5.2,
6.5. No sign of tissue damage as a result of pump implantation or
oligonucleotide delivery was evident in brain histology performed at
the conclusion of the experiment.
In Vivo Pretesting of ASO and MSO
Extensive in vivo pretesting was conducted on the ASO and MSO sequences prior to the initiation of these experiments. Both dose and time course studies were conducted. Three important conclusions were derived from these preliminary in vivo investigations. First, data from these studies was used to select the optimal dose of ASO and MSO in the current study. Second, 5-HT2A binding studies from the time course investigations demonstrated that the same level of reduction 5-HT2A receptor expression was achieved following 5, 10, 15, or 25 days of ASO infusion. This suggested that ASO produced maximum receptor reduction after 5 days and this same level is maintained following 25 days of infusion. Third, the initial in vivo studies also allowed for the verification of MSO as a control and eliminated the necessity for an additional vehicle only control group. Extensive pretesting (personal observations, this laboratory) showed that 5-HT2A receptor expression between vehicle control and MSO control was identical. An additional verification that MSO was an appropriate control is the data in the current series of studies demonstrating that there were no differences in behavior between pre- and post-ASO infusion.
General Procedures and Time Course for Behavioral Experiments
An outline and chronology of the standard experiments conducted
is provided in Table 1. The maximum life
of the pumps used in this study is 28 days, therefore all testing was
completed by, and all subjects were sacrificed on the 26th day
following pump implantation. Briefly, upon arrival, subjects were given 1 week to habituate to the colony room and to handling. Subjects then
received a minimum of 2 weeks of 24-h access to EtOH and water in
two-bottle choice paradigm. After stable intake of a 6% EtOH was
achieved, subjects were implanted with pumps. Following surgery,
subjects were returned to their home cages and the 24-h EtOH/water
choice paradigm was continued for 12 days (days 1-12 postsurgery).
Subjects were then given 1 or 2 days of rest, followed by 2 to 3 days
testing saccharin versus water preference (generally days 14-16
postsurgery) in a 1-h access paradigm. One day of rest ensued saccharin
testing followed by 4 days of quantification of behaviors displayed in
an open field following both saline and EtOH injection (generally
tested on days 18-21). One to 2 days of rest was then given followed
by 1 day of evaluation of behavior in the EPM (generally tested around
day 23). All subjects received identical time courses and procedures
through approximately day 23 postpump implantation (Table 1). At this
point, determination of further testing in each group was based on the
brain structure targeted, current theories as to the role of 5-HT and
the 5-HT2A receptor in this region, time
constraints of oligonucleotide delivery, and most importantly an
evaluation of any changes in EtOH consumption during the drinking
phase. Therefore, not all groups were subjected to the same procedures
during the final days of the experiment. These additional tests
included a test of nociceptin (DRN), measurements of blood plasma
corticosterone levels (i.c.v., CeA/L), and response to 5-HT
agonist-induced DOI-head shakes (i.c.v.). The possibility must be
considered that a subject's experience in some of the earlier testing
procedures may have influenced their behavior in subsequent tests.
Great care was taken to minimize these effects across groups, and it
must be emphasized that the schedules and procedures were held
identical for all groups.
|
Oral Self-Administration of EtOH
After approximately 1 week of habituation to the colony room and daily handling, daily consumption of water and EtOH solution were determined using a two-bottle 24-h access choice procedure. Continuous testing was then conducted for approximately 2 weeks prior to surgical pump implantation. Two 100-ml drinking tubes equipped with 8-cm stainless steel-ball-tipped sipper tubes were attached to the front of each cage. The drinking tubes were weighed and refilled with fresh solutions every day at approximately 4 h into the dark cycle, and bottle placement was rotated daily to control for position bias. Starting at 3% (v/v), the concentration of EtOH was increased by 1% every second day up to 6%. The weight of the fluid consumed was converted to (g of EtOH)/(kg of body weight) consumed, and an intake ratio, defined as (ml of EtOH/(ml of EtOH + ml of water)) was calculated. After reaching a criterion of 7 to 10 days of stable 6% (v/v) EtOH consumption (stable was defined as a minimum of five sequential days of consumption with a maximum of 20% variance across days) subjects were surgically implanted with the ASO delivery pumps and cannula. EtOH was immediately available following surgery and changes from presurgery levels were evaluated. The EtOH administration routine was kept identical to the presurgical procedure and lasted for first 12 days postsurgery.
Saccharin Testing
In paradigms where a pharmacological manipulation results in alterations of EtOH intake, the same manipulation is frequently tested on saccharin intake as well. This allows for confirmation as to whether the observed effects were specific for EtOH, or generalized to other preferred solutions as well. Control and experimental rats were tested for saccharin ingestion over 3 days in a 1-h limited access two-bottle choice paradigm. One bottle contained a 0.1% saccharin solution in tap water (w/v), and the second contained tap water. The drinking tubes were refilled with fresh solutions daily, and their positions were switched daily to control for position bias.
Open Field Test
The quantification of spontaneously occurring behaviors that are displayed in an open field arena is an important tool in determining the effects of CNS manipulations. EtOH specifically is known to produce biphasic effects in locomotor activity, in that at low-to-moderate doses, it initially acts as a stimulant (generally in the first 5 min) and then as a depressant (after 5-10 min). This effect of EtOH is thought to be an index of its reinforcing properties, and therefore an important component of EtOH's pharmacology. In the current experiment, testing occurred once a day for four consecutive days and behaviors were quantitated as originally described by. Days 1 and 2 consisted of a 5-min habituation session. Trials on the 3rd and 4th day were 10 min in length, and were preceded by an i.p. injection of saline or 0.75 g/kg EtOH (11%), respectively. The open field arena was 100 × 100 cm with the floor divided into 16 quadrants. Within the floor, there were eight equidistantly distributed 4-cm-diameter holes. Briefly, the onset, frequency, and total duration of the following behaviors were evaluated: crossover activity, rearing, grooming, headpoke, and center tendency. A crossover, a measure of locomotion, was counted when the rat crossed with all four legs from one square to another. A rear was counted when a rat stood on its hind limbs, with its forelimbs completely off the floor. A headpoke, believed to reflect exploratory behavior, was counted when the animal inserted its head below eye level into a hole in the floor. Center behavior was counted when all four legs of the rats were in one of the four center squares (total area 50 × 50 cm). The behaviors were quantified with the aid of an IBM-XT computer equipped with a manually operated interface. The observer remained in the room approximately 2 m from the testing chamber for the entire session.
Elevated Plus Maze Test
As previously mentioned, alcoholism and alcohol abuse has often been linked to stress and anxiety, and the 5-HT2A receptor has been implicated in all of these conditions. The EPM is considered a valid and robust measurement of anxiety and stress in preclinical experimentation, and therefore subjects in the current experiments were tested in this procedure. The apparatus was made of Plexiglas with the arms elevated 50 cm from the floor. It had two opposite open arms, 50 × 10 cm, and two opposite enclosed arms of the same dimensions, but with 40-cm-high Plexiglas walls. The arms were interconnected by a central square forming a plus sign. Subjects were placed on the central square and remained on the maze for a single 5-min trial. To enhance aversiveness of the test, testing was conducted under bright fluorescent lighting. The latency of arm entries, the number of entries onto, and times spent on, open and enclosed arms were quantified with the aid of an IBM-XT computer equipped with a manually operated interface.
Tail-Flick Test
The tail-flick test is a test of nociceptin and consists of direct application of a concentrated heat source to a rat's tail and measures the latency for the subject to remove its tail from the heat source. 5-HT2A receptors specifically in the DRN have been implicated in nociceptin, therefore subjects receiving ASO in to this region were tested in this paradigm as a verification of receptor knockdown produced by ASO. Rats were tested using a tail-flick analgesiometer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). The latency (in s) for the subject to retract its tail away from a focused beam of light was recorded. Each subject received three consecutive trials with a 1-min rest period between each trial.
DOI-Induced Head Shakes
The first group of subjects to receive ASO to the
5-HT2A receptor was administered ASO into the
lateral ventricle. As an in vivo test of 5-HT2A
receptor function to confirm a reduction in 5-HT2A receptor function produced by ASO, head
shakes following the injection of DOI were measured. DOI is known to
produce a stereotypic head shake response, and this behavior is thought to be mediated through the 5-HT2A receptor
(Benjamin et al., 1992b
). Rats were injected i.p. with DOI (1 mg/kg
i.p., dissolved in 0.9% saline) and placed in a 300- × 400-cm acrylic
observation chamber in a quiet testing room under fluorescent room
light. An experienced observer sat 2 m away from the observation
chamber and counted head shakes immediately after DOI injection for a
period of 30 min. No group other than those that received ASO i.c.v.
was administered DOI, because additional experiments were substituted
for this procedure (Table 1).
Restraint Stress
5-HT and 5-HT2A receptors have been implicated in stress and anxiety responses, which as previously mentioned, may be related to EtOH intake. Therefore, some groups of animals were tested in a restraint stress paradigm and blood plasma corticosterone, an index of the stress response, was analyzed. Subjects were removed from their home cage and a tail blood sample was immediately collected into heparinized tubes. Following this, subjects were placed into wire mesh cylindrical restrainers for 30 min, after which a second tail blood sample was collected.
Plasma Corticosterone Determination
Tail blood was centrifuged at 2000g for 10 min.
Plasma was collected and frozen at
70°C until analysis. Duplicate
10-µl samples of plasma were used for quantification of
corticosterone concentration using ICN radioimmunoassay kits (Irvine, CA).
5-HT2A Receptor Binding
Two different procedures were used to determine the effectiveness of 5-HT2A ASO treatment. In subjects receiving i.c.v. 5-HT2A ASO, [3H]mesulergine binding was conducted using PFC homogenate membranes. For subjects that received ASO targeted to specific brain areas, autoradiographic receptor binding was carried out using 125I-LSD.
Filtration Receptor Binding.
In subjects receiving
5-HT2A ASO i.c.v., rats were sacrificed at the
conclusion of the experiment and the brain was removed and placed on
ice. The prefrontal cortex was dissected and immediately homogenized
with a Brinkman homogenizer in 40 volumes of Tris-HCl (50 mM, pH 7.9).
Tissue from each rat was individually analyzed. Tissues were then
centrifuged at 25,000g, and the procedure was repeated for a
total of three washes and frozen in pellet form at
70°C until the
binding assay was performed. Tissues were resuspended at 1 mg of
protein/ml [protein concentrations were determined using the
kit supplied by Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA)]. The binding assay was
performed in a final volume of 250 µl; 5-HT2A
receptors were labeled with [3H]mesulergine (64 nM), and nonspecific binding was determined using spiroperidol (400 nM). The binding reaction was incubated for 3 h at room
temperature. Membranes were washed three times using a Brandel cell
harvester and collected onto filters, which were then dried and counted
at 65% efficiency in OptiFluor scintillation cocktail.
Quantitative Autoradiography.
To further delineate the
regional effects of ASO treatment on 5-HT2A
receptors, brains of ASO-treated rats were processed for the
autoradiographic receptor binding with 125I-LSD.
Following 26 days of ASO or MSO infusion, subjects were sacrificed by
decapitation, brains were rapidly removed, frozen on dry ice, and then
stored at
70°C until sectioning. Coronal tissue sections (20 µm)
were then cut using a Reichert-Jung Frigocut 2100 cryostat microtome
maintained at
21°C. Brain sections were thaw-mounted on microscope
slides subbed with a gelatin (1%, w/v) and chrome alum (chromium
potassium permanganate; 0.1%, w/v) solution. Consecutive,
superimposable sections were then used to determine total and
nonspecific binding. Following thaw-mounting, the sections were stored
under vacuum with desiccant at
20°C. 125I-LSD
(2000 Ci/mM; PerkinElmer Life Science Products, Boston, MA) at a
concentration of 50 pM in a 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4 buffer, was used to
label the 5-HT2A receptor. Tissue sections were
washed twice for 15 min in ice-cold buffer and then incubated in
radioligand-containing buffer at room temperature. For
5-HT2A receptors, nonspecific binding was
determined in the presence of spiroperidol (200 nM), which blocks
5-HT2A. Specific 5-HT2A
receptor binding was determined from calculating the difference between
total and nonspecific binding.
Drugs and Reagents
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Oligos, Etc., Inc. (Wilsonville, OR). All radioligands were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Science Products. Spiroperidol and mianserin were purchased from Sigma/RBI (Natick, MA). Tris salt and base were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Data Analysis
To evaluate the effect of 5-HT2A ASO on EtOH intake, statistical analysis was preformed across four measures: EtOH intake (g/kg), water intake (ml), EtOH intake ratio, and total fluid intake (ml). Statistical testing was conducted using a mean calculated from 3 days of presurgery baseline, and means calculated from postsurgical days 4 to 6, days 7 to 9, and days 10 to 12. All drinking measurements from postsurgery days 1 to 3 were omitted from the statistical analysis, because subjects were still recovering from surgery. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted comparing treatment (ASO or MSO) by days (day postsurgery) on all four primary measures. Open field behaviors, saccharin intake, endocrine measures, binding, and tail-flick latencies were analyzed using independent t tests, except where noted. All statistical analysis was carried out using Systat 7.0. All data are represented as means ± S.E.M.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the number of groups of animals and experimental procedures
conducted, results are organized in a semichronological manner. First,
the effects of i.c.v. ASO on receptor binding and EtOH intake are
presented, followed by binding data from a within-subjects experiment
conducted to measure the extent of oligonucleotide spread. Binding data
and EtOH and saccharin intakes are then presented from subjects
receiving ASO into the PFC, central nucleus of the amygdala, DRN, and
HIP. The additional behavioral experiments conducted, such as open
field and EPM, are discussed in the section following binding and EtOH
intake. A summary of the behavioral tests conducted and the results
from these studies is presented as Table
2.
|
ASO Treatment Selectively Down-Regulates 5-HT2A
Receptors and Alters EtOH and Saccharin Consumption.
To determine
both the extent of global CNS down-regulation produced by the ASO on
the 5-HT2A receptor and the functional
consequences, the initial experiment administered ASO by continuous
i.c.v. infusion. Following sacrifice of these animals, down-regulation
of the receptor was determined in membrane preparations obtained from
prefrontal cortex. Binding data were analyzed using a one-tailed
t test with the prediction that ASO administration would
reduce the number of 5-HT2A receptors.
Intracerebroventricular administration of 5-HT2A
ASO significantly reduced (
68.9%) 5-HT2A
receptors [t(10) = 3.31, p < 0.01],
as determined by [3H]mesulergine binding in PFC
membrane homogenate (Fig. 1A).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-HT2A Receptor Down-Regulation Also Alters Other Behaviors Related to 5-HT. Following the postsurgery 12-day EtOH intake testing phase, subjects were then tested in a variety of behavioral paradigms, many of which are thought to be indexes of anxiety and stress, to further identify the role of the 5-HT2A receptor in specific regions of the CNS.
After completion of EtOH intake, subjects receiving i.c.v. ASO were tested in the following paradigms: plasma corticosterone and behavioral response to a novel open field and EPM behaviors. After exposure to a novel open field, ASO subjects had significantly higher elevations in plasma corticosterone compared with ASO controls [t(12) = 2.51, p < 0.05] suggesting they had a hypersensitive response to the new environment (Fig. 7A). Rats receiving i.c.v. 5-HT2A ASO treatment displayed 41% greater crossing activity (an index of locomotor behavior) compared with MSO control subjects [t(6) = 2.50, p < 0.05; MSO = 31.87 ± 6.88, ASO = 77.20 ± 24.23] in a novel open field. Subjects were next tested on an EPM, a frequently used index of anxiety in the rat. Following i.c.v. treatment with 5-HT2A ASO, analysis with a two-tailed t test revealed that these rats had a higher percentage of entries and spent a higher percentage of time on the open arms of the EPM compared with MSO controls [t(6) = 3.05, p < 0.05 and t(6) = 2.49, p < 0.05, respectively] (Fig. 6). The higher number of entries into the open arms could be attributed to the ASO subjects higher basal levels of locomotor activity, however their increased duration of stay on the open arms suggests that this was due more to an anxiogenic effect resulting from down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors. Taken together, i.c.v. subjects had lower EtOH intake, higher levels of locomotor activity in the open field, and a higher percentage of time spent on the open arms of the EPM, suggesting that i.c.v. ASO produced and anxiolytic-like effect.
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current studies provide substantial evidence that
down-regulation of the 5-HT2A receptor results in
changes in EtOH and saccharin intake, as well as behaviors related to
anxiety and stress, and the direction of change is dependent upon the
CNS structure affected. These data combined with the moderate success seen using serotonergic agents to decrease alcohol intake and treat
stress-related disorders implies that the down-regulation of the
5-HT2A receptor produced by chronic use of these
compounds may be one mechanism through which they affect such behaviors (Pohorecky et al., 1998
; Roberts et al., 1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
).
Importantly, the changes observed in these experiments were produced by
levels of 5-HT2A down-regulation ranging from 15 to 29% (Table 2), which are substantially less than the 50% reduction
reported following treatment with compounds such as antidepressants
(Blackshear et al., 1986
). Additionally, the present results most
likely reflect changes only in 5-HT2A receptor
function, because our ASO sequence produced no alterations in
5-HT2C binding, which is common with many ligands
that effect 5-HT2A receptors.
The initial feasibility study of i.c.v. ASO demonstrated that CNS-wide
reduction of 5-HT2A receptors decreased EtOH
intake in a manner comparable with effects in other studies,
demonstrating that compounds that down-regulate
5-HT2A receptors also reduce EtOH intake (Meyers
et al., 1993
; Pohorecky et al., 1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
). Decreased
EtOH intake following i.c.v. ASO infusion cannot be attributed to
down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors in any one
specific CNS region. However, the decreased ethanol consumption could
be mediated in part by access of the ASO to areas bordering the
ventricles such as the amygdala. This is suggested by the current
experiments demonstrating that ASO down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors in the CeA/L decreased EtOH, as
well as saccharin, intake. The resulting change in EtOH intake
following CeA/L 5-HT2A receptor down-regulation
was the largest seen of all brain sites tested, and like the effects
seen in the i.c.v. subjects, was also comparable with decreases in EtOH
intake following administration of compounds that reduce
5-HT2A receptor expression (Meert and Janssen,
1991
; Meyers et al., 1993
; Pohorecky et al., 1998
; Roberts et al.,
1998
; Maurel et al., 1999
).
The amygdala is considered a specialized autonomic and motor-projection
region of the striatum (Cassell et al., 1999
) and mediates
stress-induced responses and expression of emotional behavior (LeDoux
et al., 1990
). Certain regions of the amygdala are moderately
innervated with dopamine,
-aminobutyric acid and glutamate neurons
(Cassell et al., 1999
). Amygdala
-aminobutyric acid-ergic neurons
appear to be important in EtOH pharmacology, as suggested by drug
discrimination and self-administration studies (Hodge and Cox, 1998
;
Roberts et al., 1998
). EtOH intake also increases amygdala glucose
utilization and produces rapid changes in immunohistochemically
measured transcription factors (c-Fos and FosB) in the
posterior-ventral portion (Porrino et al., 1998
; Bachtell et al.,
1999
). EtOH-induced locomotor activity is also associated with an
increase in the number of amygdala Fos-like-immunoreactivity neurons
(Chang et al., 1995
), and this activation may mediate the degree of
stimulatory response to EtOH (Demarest et al., 1998
). Therefore, the
EtOH's locomotor activating effect, which has been associated with its
rewarding effect, might be mediated by increased activation of neurons
intrinsic to the CeA/L. Thus, our results of decreased EtOH consumption
following ASO down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors
in the CeA/L might be explained by an increase in the basal
neural activity within the CeA/L, which prevented further EtOH-induced activation.
Conversely, ASO induced down-regulation of 5-HT2A
receptors in the PFC increased consumption of EtOH and saccharin,
suggesting that 5-HT2A PFC receptors have a tonic
inhibitory effect on intake of these solutions. The PFC is a
compartmentalized, heterogeneous region, with dopamine-containing
ascending projections originating in the ventral tegmental area; and
the pars compacta and descending projections traced to both the core
and shell of the nucleus accumbens, the periaqueductal gray area, the
DRN, and the locus coeruleus (Berendese et al., 1992
). Given the PFC's
anatomical connections with major pathways/structures associated with
mediating reinforcement and reward, the PFC has also been implicated in
the reward and reinforcement of EtOH (Bauer and Hesselbrock, 1993
;
Deckel et al., 1995
) and 5-HT has been specifically implicated
in EtOH/PFC interactions (Zhou et al., 1991
, 1994
; Murphy et al., 1992
;
McBride et al., 1993
; Devoto et al., 1998
). The present results
underscore the importance of the 5-HT2A receptor
in this system. While the specific neural mechanisms through which this
occurs are unknown, one possibility is that
5-HT2A receptors increase excitatory postsynaptic potentials in PFC medial layer V pyramidal cells (Marek and Aghajanian, 1999
; Marek et al., 2000
), enhancing neurotransmitter release from
glutamate terminals, leading to an inhibitory effect on reward processes.
5-HT2A receptor knockdown also produced changes
in anxiety and stress behaviors and modulated plasma corticosterone
levels in several experimental groups. A comparison of the behavioral changes across different treatment groups revealed that there was a
consistent pattern between i.c.v. and PFC ASO subjects in relation to
stress and anxiety behaviors and the direction of change in EtOH
intake. The decrease in EtOH intake by i.c.v. ASO subjects was
accompanied by increased locomotor activity, greater duration of time
spent in the open arms of the EPM, and a hypersensitive reaction of
plasma corticosterone following novel environment exposure. These
behavioral effects are comparable with those seen following treatment
with compounds that down-regulate 5-HT2A
receptors. For example, mianserin increases time spent on the open arms
of the EPM and is a releaser of spontaneously occurring behaviors in
such paradigms as the open field (Benjamin et al., 1992a
). Together, this suggests that i.c.v. ASO down-regulation of
5-HT2A receptors produced an anxiolytic-like
profile, which was comparable with that seen following administration
of compounds that down-regulate 5-HT2A receptors
(Benjamin et al., 1992b
). Similar anxiolytic-like effects
following ASO-induced down-regulation of 5-HT2A
receptors have been seen in mice (Sibille et al., 1997
).
Down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptors in the PFC
resulted in an anxiogenic behavioral pattern that was almost the
inverse of the effects seen in i.c.v. subjects. Specifically, PFC ASO
subjects displayed significantly fewer open arm entries on the EPM, a
blunted plasma corticosterone increase following exposure to a novel
environment, and an increase in EtOH intake. It is difficult to
ascertain what role either the anxiolytic or anxiogenic effects, seen
in i.c.v. and PFC subjects, respectively, following ASO treatment had
in the opposing changes in EtOH intake.
The data from subjects receiving ASO in the CeA/L are not as clear in
identifying a pattern between anxiety-related behaviors and EtOH
intake. ASO administration into the CeA/L decreased EtOH consumption,
in a manner analogous to i.c.v. subjects. In contrast to i.c.v. and PFC
subjects, CeA/L subjects showed no significant differences in behaviors
related to stress and anxiety. This was surprising, because amygdaloid
structures have been linked to the stress response (Sibille et al.,
1997
; Morelli and Pinna, 1999
). While no changes in
anxiety-related behaviors were seen following ASO infusion into the
CeA/L, changes in basal plasma corticosterone were observed. However,
unlike i.c.v. and PFC subjects, CeA/L 5-HT2A
receptor down-regulation did not influence the plasma corticosterone
response following a stressor. This finding is relevant, given that the
CeA/L contains the highest density of corticotrophin-releasing
factor-containing cell bodies in the amygdaloid complex (Van Bockstaele
et al., 1998
). Additionally, since antidepressant treatments decrease
both plasma glucocorticoid levels and 5-HT2A
receptor function (Lopez et al., 1997
, Kozuru et al., 2000
) these
findings suggest CeA/L 5-HT2A receptor
down-regulation might be a mechanism for the
hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis-attenuating action of antidepressants.
While 5-HT2A receptor down-regulation produced changes in open field and EPM behaviors and corticosterone function in different groups of subjects, it is possible that these systems, while overlapping in their physiology, are separate from those underlying EtOH intake. Certainly, further testing is warranted before any conclusions can be drawn.
In the case of the DRN, while no changes in EtOH ingestion occurred, change in nociceptin in ASO-treated subjects indicates the effectiveness of the local ASO infusion. In contrast, infusion of ASO into the HIP had no effect on any evaluated measure. Given the size of this structure, it is possible that ASO infusion into more anterior or posterior regions may have produced behavioral changes.
The current studies suggest that the 5-HT2A receptor can positively or negatively regulate reward systems for EtOH and saccharin intake, and anxiety-related behaviors, depending upon the CNS structure targeted. Such site-specific duality of action most likely reflects different local neurocircuitry and neurochemistry interacting with decreased 5-HT2A receptor expression. Brains from the present subjects were used to verify the extent of 5-HT2A receptor down-regulation produced by the ASO, limiting the identification of subsequent changes in specific alternate compensatory biological mechanisms as a result of 5-HT2A receptor down-regulation. However, it must be considered that such compensatory mechanisms occurred. Clearly, the observed changes did not reflect effects on thirst mechanisms, because total fluid consumption did not differ between any treatment group and their respective controls. Although food intake was not measured, body weights between ASO and control animals did not significantly differ, indicating that general caloric mechanisms were not affected.
In conclusion, down-regulation of 5-HT2A receptor
down-regulation induces differential behavioral effects across multiple paradigms, which are unique to the brain structure targeted. These results may offer insight into the findings that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and both 5-HT2A
agonists and antagonists reduce EtOH intake (Meert and Janssen, 1991
;
unpublished observations, this laboratory). All three types of
compounds typically produce down-regulation of the
5-HT2A receptor, in a manner similar to the ASO
sequence used in these studies.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Drs. Sidney Auerbach, Patricia Buckendahl, Arthur Tomie, and Miklos Toth for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 1, 2001.
Received for publication February 23, 2001.
This research was supported in part by funds from the National Institute of Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, Grant 1RO1AA10124. Portions of this research were presented at the 1997 and 1998 Annual Meetings of the Society for Neuroscience and at the Annual Meeting of the Research Society for Alcohol, 1997 and 1998.
Address correspondence to: Larissa A. Pohorecky, Rutgers University, Busch Campus, Center of Alcohol Studies, Division of Neuropharmacology, 607 Allison Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854-8100. E-mail: larissa{at}rci.rutgers.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-HT, serotonin, 5-hydroxytryptamine; EtOH, ethanol; DOI, dihydroxyiodoaminopropane; CNS, central nervous system; PFC, prefrontal cortex; CeA/L, central amygdaloid nucleus, medial and lateral division; DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus; HIP, hippocampus; ASO, antisense oligonucleotide; MSO, missense oligonucleotide; EPM, elevated plus maze; LSD, D-lysergic acid diethylamide; MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|