![]() |
|
|
Vol. 298, Issue 3, 947-953, September 2001
Neural Damage and Repair Research Group, Centre for Neuroscience, Division of Physiology, Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' School of Biomedical Science, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, United Kingdom (S.A.T., M.B.S.); and Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Greenford, United Kingdom (A.B.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
barriers in the distribution of anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
drugs is integral to the design of effective treatment regimens for HIV
infection within the brain. Abacavir (formerly 1592U89) is a nucleoside
analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which has activity
against HIV. The ability of this drug to reach the brain at therapeutic
concentrations has been explored by means of an established bilateral
in situ brain perfusion model in combination with high-performance
liquid chromatography analysis in the anesthetized guinea pig. The
influence of other drugs on the entry of abacavir into the brain was
also investigated and is of special significance with the use of three
of more anti-HIV drugs as the recommended treatment for HIV infection.
The results of this study indicate that intact
[14C]abacavir can cross the blood-brain and blood-CSF
barriers and enter the brain and cisternal CSF. Further studies, at a
perfusion time of 10 min, revealed that the uptake
(Rcerebrum) of this 14C-labeled
drug (10.1 ± 0.6%) was not affected by the presence of 0.86 to
200 µM unlabeled abacavir (6.8 µM; 11.0 ± 1.4%), the nucleoside transport inhibitor [10 µM
6-(4-nitrobenzyl)thio-9-
-D-ribofuranosylpurine; 9.7 ± 3.3%], or a substrate for the nucleobase transporter (100 µM adenine; 12.7 ± 3.0%). This would suggest that the entry of abacavir into the brain would not be affected by the presence of other
anti-HIV drugs. The results of this animal study indicate that abacavir
would be a useful addition to a treatment regimen against HIV-infection
within the brain.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
free movement of drugs into the brain is restricted by the presence of
the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers. The blood-brain barrier (BBB)
is located at the level of the cerebral capillary endothelial cells and
is associated with the presence of tight junctions, metabolic enzymes,
and the lack of intracellular vesicles and endothelial fenestrae
(Brightman and Reese, 1969
). It protects the brain from many toxins and
pathogens that are present within the blood. The blood-CSF barrier is
formed by the choroid plexuses and arachnoid membrane. The choroid
plexuses consist of a single layer of epithelial cells enclosing a
vascular core. It is the epithelial cells that, as well as being
responsible for secreting the majority of CSF (Cserr, 1971
), are joined
together by a sealing ring of tight junctions and thus block the free
paracellular movement of molecules (Brightman and Reese, 1969
; Smith
and Shine, 1992
). Tight junctions are also located between the cells of
the arachnoid membrane (Nabeshima et al., 1975
; Smith and Shine, 1992
).
HIV-1 is thought to enter the central nervous system (CNS) early in
infection and can persist in the brain throughout the course of the
disease (Resnick et al., 1988
; Sawchuk and Yang, 1999
; Ellis et al.,
2000
). The brain provides a sanctuary site for virus replication,
protecting it from plasma levels of anti-HIV drugs due to the presence
of the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers (Cohen, 1998
; Schrager and
D'Souza, 1998
; Marra and Booss, 2000
). A clearer understanding of the
ability of anti-HIV drugs to cross these barriers and enter the brain
is of major concern if we are to 1) eradicate this viral reservoir and
prevent peripheral reinfection, and thus allow systemic therapy to be
effective (Groothuis and Levy, 1997
; Perelson et al., 1997
); 2)
prevent the emergence of drug resistant strains of HIV, which is
associated with suboptimal concentrations of anti-HIV drugs (Schrager
and D'Souza, 1998
; Young and Kuritzkes, 1999
); and 3) treat and
possibly prevent the neurological disorders, such as acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome dementia complex, associated with HIV
infection (Dore et al., 1999
; Gartner, 2000
; Major et al., 2000
).
The objective of this present study is to investigate the ability of
the anti-HIV nucleoside analog, abacavir
[(
)-(1S,4R)-4-[2-amino-6-(cyclopropylamino)-H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-methanol; 1592U89], to cross the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and enter
the brain tissue. The bilateral in situ brain perfusion technique in
anesthetized guinea pigs, in combination with capillary depletion
analysis, is a well established method and has been used to explore the
movement of other anti-HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(RTIs) into the CNS (Thomas and Segal, 1996
, 1997a
, 1998
). It also has
the advantage that it explores the movement of molecules into the brain
and CSF simultaneously and allows any differences between drug
distribution into these different regions to be observed. This is of
immense importance as clinical studies are necessarily confined to
measuring drug concentrations within human CSF (Tashima, 1998
).
Unfortunately, the concentration of a drug in the CSF does not reflect
the concentration of a drug in the brain tissue (Groothuis and Levy,
1997
; Thomas and Segal, 1998
).
The animal brain perfusion model also has the advantage that it allows
specific solute concentrations in the artificial plasma to be
manipulated, which is essential if the mechanisms of transport of a
particular molecule into the CNS are to be elucidated. This is of
interest if we are to understand potential drug interactions at the
transport level of the brain barriers and has become more of a concern
with the current recommendations for the treatment of HIV infection,
which involves using three or more anti-HIV drugs in parallel
(International AIDS Society-USA, 2000
). If combinations of anti-HIV
drugs interact competitively for transport sites at the level of the
blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers in vivo, it is likely that at least
one of the drugs would not reach its therapeutic concentration and
therefore would no longer effectively suppress viral replication. This
failure would allow the development of drug-resistant variants of HIV,
which is a major concern in the design of effective long-term treatment
regimens for HIV infection. A recent study has suggested that both
abacavir and azidodeoxythymidine (AZT; zidovudine) can interact with a
thymidine transporter identified in a continuous rat microglia cell
line (MLS-9) (Hong et al., 2000
). To address these issues at the level
of the brain barriers in vivo, the mechanism of abacavir entry into the
CNS was also investigated using the brain perfusion model.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bilateral in Situ Brain Perfusion.
All experimental
procedures were carried out within the guidelines of the Animals
(Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986, United Kingdom. The bilateral in
situ brain perfusion technique in anesthetized guinea pigs has been
previously described and will only be briefly detailed here (Thomas and
Segal, 1996
). Adult Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (250-350 g) were
anesthetized (0.32 mg/kg i.m. fentanyl, 10 mg/kg fluanisone, 5 mg/kg
midazolam) and heparinized (10,000 U/kg i.p.). The common carotid
arteries were cannulated with silicon tubing connected to a perfusion
system and the jugular veins were sectioned with the start of
perfusion. The perfusion fluid consisted of thrice-washed ovine
erythrocytes suspended in a saline-dextran (mol. wt. = 70,000) medium
to a hematocrit of 20% (Thomas and Segal, 1996
). The fluid was gassed
with 95% O2 and 5% CO2
and maintained at 37°C using a water bath. The pH of the oxygenated perfusion fluid was 7.4. The perfusion fluid was passed, by means of a
peristaltic pump, through a filter and bubble trap before entering each
carotid artery at a flow rate of 3.7 ml/min. Perfusion pressure was
maintained at approximately 100 mm Hg.
[14C]Abacavir was introduced via a side arm
into the perfusion medium at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and achieved a
final concentration in the inflowing perfusion medium of 0.86 µM.
After the set perfusion period (2.5-30 min) a cisterna magna CSF
sample was taken and the animal was decapitated. The perfusion fluid
containing the radiolabeled abacavir was collected from the individual
carotid cannulas at the end of each time point to serve as a reference. The brain was removed and the individual cerebral hemispheres and
cerebellum homogenized separately. Part of the homogenate (three
samples per cerebral hemisphere and two per cerebellum), the CSF and
100 µl of perfusate samples were prepared for radioactive scintillation counting by the addition of 0.5 ml of tissue solubilizer (Solusol; National Diagnostics, Hull, UK). The samples were left to
dissolve over 24 h and then, with the addition of 3.5 ml of scintillation fluid (Uniscint BD; National Diagnostics), taken for
radioactive counting on a LKB-Wallac 1219 Rackbeta liquid scintillation
counter (EG and G Wallac, Milton Keynes, UK). This spectrometer has a
dual multichannel analyzer that automatically corrects the counts per
minute for chemiluminescence. Counting error was
3% for each
sample. The corrected counts per minute were then converted to
disintegrations per minute by the use of internally stored quench curves.
-D-ribofuranosylpurine (NBMPR),
a nucleoside transport inhibitor, on the uptake of radiolabeled abacavir were also investigated after a perfusion period of 10 min
(Plagemann et al., 1988Capillary Depletion Analysis. Measurement of the cerebral vascular component to total brain uptake of radiolabeled abacavir was performed using a capillary depletion step. Cerebral hemisphere samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in 3.5 ml of physiological buffer kept on ice [10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, 141 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 2.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM NaH2PO4, and 10 mM D-glucose]. The sample was further diluted with 4 ml of ice-cold 26% dextran (mol. wt. = 70,000) and the sample rehomogenized. Two aliquots of homogenate were taken and centrifuged at 5400g for 15 min in a centrifuge (Heraeus Instruments, Brentwood, UK). The capillary depleted supernatant was then separated from the vascular enriched pellet and prepared for radioactive scintillation counting as described above.
Expression of Results.
The amount of radioactivity in the
brain and CSF (disintegrations per minute per unit weight) was
expressed as a ratio of that found in the perfusate and termed
RBrain and
RCSF, respectively. Blood-to-brain and
blood-CSF transfer constants (Kin;
µl/min/g) were determined by single-time point analysis by means of
the following equation (Williams et al., 1996
):
|
Ultrafiltration Centrifugal Dialysis.
Drug binding to
dextran (mol. wt. = 70,000) and sheep serum protein at 37°C was
determined by ultrafiltration centrifugal dialysis (Williams et al.,
1996
). Ovine erythrocytes were suspended in the perfusion medium at a
hematocrit of 20% and were then removed by centrifugation at
3000g and discarded. [14C]Abacavir
(final concentration 2.17 µM) was then placed in 1 ml of this warmed
(37°C) perfusion medium and pipetted into the Centrifree
micropartition device (cut-off mol. wt. = 30,000; Amicon, Beverly, MA).
The device was centrifuged at 1874g for 10 min and approximately 340 µl of ultrafiltrate was obtained. The total concentration (T) of [14C]abacavir
introduced into the system and that found in the ultrafiltrate (F) were determined by the addition of 3.5 ml of
scintillation fluid to triplicate 100-µl aliquots and subsequent
liquid scintillation counting. The percentage of
[14C]abacavir bound to dextran and protein was
then expressed as follows:
|
Lipophilicity of Abacavir. A partition coefficient for abacavir in 1-octanol/saline was determined by dissolving [14C]abacavir (0.0074 MBq) in 3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, at room temperature. An aliquot was then placed in a microcentrifuge tube and an equal volume of 1-octanol was added. The tubes were vortexed and then centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min. The upper octanol phase and lower aqueous phase were separated and 100-µl aliquots taken for radioactive counting with the addition of 3.5 ml of scintillation fluid. The partition coefficient was calculated as the ratio of labeled substance found in the octanol phase to that found in the aqueous phase.
HPLC Analysis. To ensure [14C]abacavir was stable in the perfusion medium and could reach the brain intact, samples from the arterial perfusate, venous outflow, and brain were analyzed using a Jasco HPLC gradient system (which included a HG-1580 high-pressure, high-performance gradient HPLC solvent delivery system, AS-1555-10 cooled autosampler, and UV-1575 UV/Vis detector; Jasco, Great Dunmow, Essex, UK) coupled to a Packard radioactive detector (Radiomatic 515TR analyzer; Packard, Pangbourne, UK).
Perfusion medium samples were prepared for analysis by centrifugation to remove the erythrocytes, and the supernatant was then diluted to form a 50% acetonitrile solution. After mixing the sample was centrifuged at 13,000g for 5 min at 4°C (Heraerus centrifuge). The supernatant was removed and diluted to produce a sample for HPLC analysis with a final acetonitrile concentration of <10%. Brain extractions were performed using a modified method of Williams et al. (1996)Data Analysis. For all experiments the data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Jandel Scientific (San Rafael, CA) SigmaStat software was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Materials. [14C]Abacavir succinate (specific activity 57.5 mCi/mmol) was synthesized by Glaxo Wellcome Inc. (Research Triangle Park, NC). Radiochemical purity was determined to be 96%. Unlabeled abacavir (mol. wt. = 404.4) was also synthesized by Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development. Unless specified all other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, Dorset, UK).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Entry of [14C]abacavir into the brain and
CSF was examined by means of the in situ brain perfusion technique in
anesthetized guinea pigs and compared with results for the plasma space
marker molecule mannitol (Fig. 1). The
uptake of [14C]abacavir into the cerebrum rose
from 3.0 ± 1.3% at 2.5 min to 21.6 ± 5.1% at 30 min and
was significantly greater than that measured for mannitol at all
measured time points (Mann-Whitney rank sum test, p < 0.005). The whole brain was also separated into two compartments, a
capillary endothelial cell enriched pellet and the brain tissue (Fig.
2). This capillary depletion analysis identifies the fraction of drug that has been trapped within the cerebrovascular endothelial cell and therefore has not actually entered
the central nervous system. A small percentage of radiolabeled drug was
detected in the capillary endothelial cell enriched pellet (<2.4%),
but the majority of the radioactivity detected in the whole brain was
located in the brain tissue (Fig. 2).
|
|
The uptake of abacavir into the CSF was 0.6 ± 0.3% at 2.5 min and rose to 12.6 ± 2.3% at 30 min. The brain and CSF data illustrated in Fig. 1 was found to be unsuitable for regression analysis by testing the values of the residuals for homoscedasticity (Spearman rank correlation, p < 0.01). Thus, single-time uptake analysis to determine a unidirectional transfer constant was performed at 10 min. The rate of transfer of [14C]abacavir into the brain (9.3 ± 0.6 µl/min/g) after considering mannitol/vascular space (0.8 ± 0.1%) was significantly greater than that into the CSF (4.5 ± 1.4 µl/min/g; Students' t test, p < 0.05). The negligible difference between the uptake of [14C]abacavir into the whole brain and the brain tissue compartment (Fig. 2) would suggest that any accumulation of [14C]abacavir within the capillary endothelial cells does not significantly contribute to the calculated Kin value.
Figure 3 illustrates the uptake of
radiolabeled abacavir into the cerebrum, cerebellum, and CSF in the
presence of varying concentrations of unlabeled abacavir at a perfusion
period of 10 min. As can be seen the uptake of
[14C]abacavir was not significantly affected by
the presence of 6.8, 50, 150, or 200 µM unlabeled abacavir. Studies
were also performed at a perfusion period of 5 and 20 min and an
unlabeled abacavir concentration of 100 µM and further confirmed that
there was no significant self-inhibition of radiolabeled drug uptake
(Fig. 4). Figure 4 also shows the data
obtained after part of the cerebrum was taken for capillary depletion
analysis. In addition, cross-competition studies indicated that
[14C]abacavir was not significantly taken into
the brain by either an NBMPR-sensitive, nucleoside transport system or
a nucleobase (adenine) transport system (Fig.
5).
|
|
|
Figure 6 illustrates the extraction of
[14C]abacavir in the perfusion medium before
(arterial inflow) and after (venous outflow) it had passed through the
cerebral circulation. As can be seen the majority of the radioactivity
was eluted as a single peak, with the retention times matching each
other as well as radioactive standards for this nucleoside analog.
Small radioactive peaks were detected in the solvent front (~2.0%)
at 11.8 min (~2.4%) and at 12.9 min (~6.7%) in the samples taken
from the venous outflow. The extraction of intact
[14C]abacavir in the brain was important in
determining whether the multiple-time uptake data actually represented
intact drug and not free radioactive counts (Fig.
7). Due to the high level of radioactivity detected in the brain after 10 min (Fig. 1) it was possible to examine the brain for [14C]abacavir
after a brain perfusion period of this length. After this period most
of the radioactivity eluted at a retention time of 16 min 50 s,
which matched the radioactive abacavir standard.
|
|
The octanol/saline partition coefficient for [14C]abacavir was 6.6 ± 0.2 (n = 3). The percentage of protein bound [14C]abacavir in the perfusion medium, which contained ovine erythrocytes, was determined to be 10.8 ± 1.0% (n = 6), with >89% remaining in the free form.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abacavir is a carbocyclic nucleoside analog RTI, which has been
shown to be safe and well tolerated by HIV-infected patients (Saag et
al., 1998
; Hughes et al., 1999
; Kumar et al., 1999
). Studies have shown
that abacavir can enter rat brain and monkey CSF (Daluge et al., 1997
);
however, this is the first study to examine the mechanisms of abacavir
transport into both mammalian brain and CSF. This is important when we
consider the complex relationship between drug concentrations in the
brain and CSF and also that several anti-HIV drugs are now given in
parallel to patients, so abacavir might compete with other drugs for
transport into the brain.
Figures 1, 2, 6, and 7 illustrate that intact
[14C]abacavir can cross the BBB and confirms a
study that found intact abacavir in rat brain 2 h after
intraperitoneal administration (Daluge et al., 1997
). Figure 6 also
confirms that there was little dissociation of the
14C label from abacavir during its passage
through the cerebral circulation and that intact drug was presented to
the luminal membranes of the barriers.
Abacavir (300 mg) is administered to HIV-infected patients twice daily
(Kumar et al., 1999
). Furthermore, the mean human plasma abacavir
concentration after this dose has been administered is twice the 50%
inhibitory concentration in HIV-1 clinical isolates for over 6 h
(IC50 = 0.26 µM; Daluge et al., 1997
; Kumar et
al., 1999
). The transfer constant for the cerebrum uptake of
[14C]abacavir was 9.3 µl/min/g and was used
to calculate a theoretical flux for abacavir entry into the mammalian
brain (4.8 pmol/min/g) and estimate that it would take ~55 min for
abacavir to reach an effective brain concentration (i.e., 0.26 µM).
It is important to note that this modeling does not consider abacavir
distribution into target cells within the brain, kinetics of
intracellular phosphorylation, disposition of the active metabolite
(carbovir triphosphate; Faletto et al., 1997
), metabolism in pathways
other than carbovir triphosphate production, and removal of abacavir from the brain. These factors could reduce the antiviral effect of
abacavir within the brain and increase the estimated time taken for
abacavir to reach its IC50 value.
The CSF uptake of [14C]abacavir was 0.6 ± 0.3% at 2.5 min, appeared to plateau between 10 to 20 min, and then at
30 min (12.6 ± 2.3%) was double that of 20 min (Fig. 1). This
increase is possibly a consequence of the CSF sink action, whereby
diffusion of abacavir from the brain results in drug accumulation in
the CSF. The effect of time on the uptake of abacavir into the CSF did
not follow a linear relationship and single-time uptake analysis
revealed a transfer constant of 4.5 ± 1.4 µl/min/g. These
results indicate that [14C]abacavir can cross
the blood-CSF barrier at a greater rate than that for mannitol
(p < 0.05; 0.6 ± 0.1 µl/min/g). These results are in agreement with earlier studies that found abacavir in the CSF of
monkeys 1 h after oral administration; the abacavir levels being
16 to 20% of that found in the plasma (Daluge et al., 1997
). Clinical
studies revealed a CSF to plasma abacavir ratio of 18%, ~2 h after
administration of 200 mg of abacavir to HIV-infected patients who were
receiving the drug three times daily (McDowell et al., 1999
). Abacavir
has also been detected in human CSF after a single 600-mg oral dose
(McDowell et al., 1999
).
The brain uptake of abacavir after considering vascular space was
significantly greater than uptake into CSF. Although it is appreciated
that in in vivo studies the separation of uptake across either the BBB
or the blood-CSF barrier is not possible, it would appear unlikely that
the blood-CSF route would produce the abacavir levels observed in the
brain. In brief, this is related to the differing structural
characteristics of the brain barriers (Bouldin and Krigman, 1975
), the
smaller surface area of the choroid plexuses verse the cerebral
capillaries, the inefficient ability of certain drugs in the CSF to
reach deep brain sites by the process of diffusion (Groothuis and Levy,
1997
), and the sink action nature of the CSF to brain extracellular
fluid (for review, see Thomas and Segal, 1998
). If the CSF route was
acting as the predominant route of brain entry you would expect a
higher concentration of [14C]abacavir in the
CSF and a brain level that followed the CSF concentration.
Figures 3 and 4 revealed that a saturable uptake of
[14C]abacavir could not be detected and would
suggest that a transport system is not involved in
[14C]abacavir entry into the brain or CSF. This
is in agreement with Mahony et al. (1995)
who showed that abacavir
entered human erythrocytes and CD4+ cells by
passive diffusion. The multiple-time uptake studies for
[14C]abacavir show a nonlinear uptake with time
(Figs. 1 and 2), which due to the nonsaturable nature of abacavir
uptake (Fig. 3), would suggest that an efflux process is involved in
the overall movement of [14C]abacavir into the
brain. At the earlier time points influx is greater than efflux, but
after 15-min influx and efflux become equal, hence the reduced uptake rate.
Abacavir is ultimately anabolized to carbovir triphosphate, the potent
inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase (Faletto et al., 1997
). Carbovir
can permeate erythrocyte membranes by facilitated diffusion; primarily
by the nucleobase carrier and secondarily by the nucleoside transporter
(Mahony et al., 1992
). Nucleoside carriers have been identified at the
BBB and the blood-CSF barriers of the guinea pig (Thomas and Segal,
1996
, 1997b
). Nucleobase carriers have been identified at the dog BBB
(Drewes and Gilboe, 1977
) and rabbit choroid plexus (Washington and
Giacomini, 1995
). The absence of an effect by unlabeled abacavir and
the nucleoside transporter inhibitor (NBMPR) on the CNS uptake of
[14C]abacavir suggests that the movement of
intact abacavir and not its metabolite, carbovir, has been measured
(Figs. 3-5). This was also indicated by the cross-competition study
with the nucleobase transporter substrate adenine (Fig. 5). In
addition, HPLC analysis would confirm that the brain uptake of intact
radiolabeled abacavir has been examined (Fig. 7). Furthermore, these
results suggest that abacavir would not compete with other anti-HIV
drugs at the transport level of the brain barriers for entry into the
brain. (It is possible, however, that other drugs do affect the brain removal of abacavir. As stated earlier this study does support the
concept of an efflux of abacavir out of the CNS). Abacavir and AZT can
interact with a sodium-dependent nucleoside transporter of the N3
(cib) type identified in a continuous rat microglia cell
line (MLS-9) (Hong et al., 2000
). However, it is thought that if a
sodium-dependent nucleoside transporter is present at the guinea pig
blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers, it is of the N2 (cit)
type (Thomas and Segal, 1997b
). The differing substrate selectivities
of the N2 and N3 transporters may explain the absence of abacavir
interaction with the nucleoside transporter previously suggested at the
guinea pig brain barriers. In addition, a clinical study has indicated
that coadministration of AZT or 3TC with abacavir does not
significantly affect abacavir pharmacokinetics (Wang et al., 1999
).
Abacavir and AZT have been shown to enter rat brain and monkey CSF to a
similar extent (Daluge et al., 1997
). However, in this present
investigation the transfer constant for
[14C]abacavir uptake into the brain was greater
than that previously determined for [3H]AZT (11 times) and [3H]D4T (27 times) (Thomas and
Segal, 1997a
, 1998
). The ability of substances to cross cell membranes
is partly related to lipophilicity and the greater ability of abacavir,
compared with the other nucleoside analogs, to enter the brain could be
related to its higher lipophilicity as measured by its octanol-saline
partition coefficient. However, another influence on the ability of
drugs to enter the brain is drug binding to plasma proteins. The
protein binding aspect of this present study quantified the percentage
of unbound abacavir that was present in the perfusion medium (i.e.,
>89%) and cannot be related to human plasma protein binding studies.
It has been estimated that 50% of abacavir is protein bound in human
plasma (McDowell et al., 1999
) and that AZT is not highly protein bound (Dudley, 1995
). This difference may explain the discrepancy observed between the studies comparing CNS uptake of abacavir and AZT. An
investigation into the spread of viral infection in the CNS using a
severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model of HIV-1 encephalitis,
however, has shown that abacavir and lamivudine (3TC) are more
effective in decreasing viral replication compared with the other
nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, including AZT (Limoges et
al., 2000
). Although the difference measured in this HIV-1 encephalitis
study could be due to peripheral pharmacokinetics, it may also be
related to the ability of the drugs to reach the brain.
Overall, this present study suggests that the nucleoside RTI abacavir can reach the mammalian brain. These data would also suggest that abacavir entry into the CNS would be unaffected by the presence of other anti-HIV drugs. However, it is not known whether combinations of anti-HIV drugs would affect the removal of abacavir from the brain. These results suggest that abacavir might be an important addition to a treatment regimen for HIV infection within the brain.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 14, 2001.
Received for publication March 26, 2001.
This work was supported by grants from Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development and The Wellcome Trust. S.A.T. is a Wellcome Research Career Development Fellow.
Address correspondence to: Dr. S. Thomas, Neural Damage and Repair Research Group, Center for Neuroscience, Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, Hodgkin Bldg., London SE1 1UL, UK. E-mail: sarah.thomas{at}kcl.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid;
BBB, blood-brain
barrier;
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
RTI, reverse transcriptase
inhibitor;
AZT, azidodeoxythymidine;
CNS, central nervous system;
NBMPR, 6-(4-nitrobenzyl)thio-9-
-D-ribofuranosylpurine;
HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and eradicate
hidden HIV.
Science (Wash DC)
279:
1854-1855
)-carbovir in human erythrocytes and human T-lymphoblastoid CD4+ CEM cells (Abstract).
Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res
36:
2211.
-opioid receptor selective enkephalin, [D-penicillamine2,5]enkephalin, across the blood-brain and the blood-CSF barriers.
J Neurochem
66:
1289-1299[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Shaik, N. Giri, G. Pan, and W. F. Elmquist P-glycoprotein-Mediated Active Efflux of the Anti-HIV1 Nucleoside Abacavir Limits Cellular Accumulation and Brain Distribution Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 2076 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pan, N. Giri, and W. F. Elmquist Abcg2/Bcrp1 Mediates the Polarized Transport of Antiretroviral Nucleosides Abacavir and Zidovudine Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1165 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Gibbs, Z. Gaffen, and S. A. Thomas Nevirapine Uptake into the Central Nervous System of the Guinea Pig: An in Situ Brain Perfusion Study J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2006; 317(2): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Anthonypillai, R. N. Sanderson, J. E. Gibbs, and S. A. Thomas The Distribution of the HIV Protease Inhibitor, Ritonavir, to the Brain, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Choroid Plexuses of the Guinea Pig J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 912 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Gibbs, T. Rashid, and S. A. Thomas Effect of Transport Inhibitors and Additional Anti-HIV Drugs on the Movement of Lamivudine (3TC) across the Guinea Pig Brain Barriers J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||