JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alden, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by García, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alden, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by García, J.

Vol. 297, Issue 2, 727-735, May 2001


Differential Effect of Gabapentin on Neuronal and Muscle Calcium Currents

Kris J. Alden and Jesús García

Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Calcium channels modulate cell function by controlling Ca2+ influx. A main component of these proteins is the alpha 2/delta subunit. Nevertheless, how this subunit regulates channel activity in situ is unclear. Gabapentin (GBP), an analgesic and anti-epileptic agent with an unknown mechanism of action, specifically binds to the alpha 2/delta subunit. Using the patch clamp technique, we tested the effects of GBP on Ca2+ currents from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, the mediators of pain perception, to determine how GBP binding modifies channel activity. In DRGs, GBP significantly reduced whole cell Ca2+ current amplitude at positive membrane potentials when a pulse preceded the test pulses or when cells were stimulated with a train of pulses. In control cells, neither prepulse depolarization nor pulse trains reduced Ca2+ currents at positive potentials. GBP did not reduce the low-voltage activated Ca2+ current under any experimental condition. Similar to DRG cells, GBP attenuated Ca2+ current in skeletal myotubes at positive membrane potentials in the presence of a depolarizing prepulse. However, GBP did not significantly alter Ca2+ currents in cardiac myocytes. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm expression of the alpha 2/delta subunit in these cells. Each cell type expressed multiple isoforms of alpha 2/delta . Muscle cells showed a more variable expression of alpha 2/delta subunits than did DRG cells. Our results suggest a possible participation of the alpha 2/delta subunit in the action of GBP. Our data also indicate that GBP inhibits Ca2+ channels in a use- and voltage-dependent manner at a therapeutically relevant concentration.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Gabapentin (GBP) is currently used with high efficacy and a favorable side effect profile in the treatment of refractory epilepsy (Ramsay, 1994) and as an analgesic agent in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy (Backonja et al., 1998), direct nerve injury (Rosenberg et al., 1997), and postherpetic neuralgia (Rowbotham et al., 1998). Although the analgesic and anticonvulsant properties of GBP may be related, no consensus exists to explain the diverse laboratory and clinical findings. Discerning the underlying mechanism behind GBP's actions has proven difficult. Interestingly, GBP was found to bind to the alpha 2/delta subunit of brain voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCC) with high affinity (Kd 38 nM) (Suman-Chauhan et al., 1993; Gee et al., 1996).

VGCC are composed of the pore-forming, voltage-sensing alpha 1 subunit and the auxiliary subunits alpha 2/delta and beta . Additionally, gamma  subunits are found in channels isolated from skeletal muscle (Eberst et al., 1997) and brain (Letts et al., 1998). For more than a decade, it was believed that the alpha 2/delta subunit was encoded by one gene (gene 1) (Ellis et al., 1988), but recently two other genes have been identified (genes 2 and 3) (Klugbauer et al., 1999). GBP is a compound that binds to the alpha 2/delta subunit of Ca2+ channels. However, it is not known whether GBP can attenuate Ca2+ currents by binding to the alpha 2/delta subunit. Thus, in this study we examined the effects of GBP on Ca2+ currents recorded from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells, the mediators of pain perception. In addition, we compared possible effects of GBP on Ca2+ currents from skeletal and cardiac cells since they possess fewer types of Ca2+ currents (and thus represent a simpler system) and because no side effects in muscle have been reported.

DRG, skeletal, and cardiac cells were isolated from newborn mice and studied with the whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique. Our results demonstrate that GBP, at a clinically relevant concentration of 10 µM (Taylor et al., 1998), significantly decreases Ca2+ currents in DRG cells but only in the presence of a depolarizing prepulse or with repetitive stimulation. Additionally, we found that 50 µM GBP significantly reduces Ca2+ currents in skeletal myotubes but does not affect Ca2+ currents in cardiac myocytes. Furthermore, we examined alpha 2/delta gene expression via RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing and found that DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells possess multiple alpha 2/delta subunit isoforms, suggesting that VGCC from these cells may vary with respect to the effects of GBP. Thus, this report demonstrates that, as with the initial studies, GBP does not decrease Ca2+ currents in neuronal cells stimulated with simple voltage steps. However, by using a prepulse or with repetitive stimulation, we were able to record changes in Ca2+ currents. Reduced Ca2+ currents in DRGs and skeletal muscle in the presence of a prepulse provides insight into function of the alpha 2/delta subunit in VGCC, which previously has been difficult to elucidate. Furthermore, our results suggest that the action of GBP on the alpha 2/delta subunit could contribute to its analgesic action.

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The experiments conducted were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Illinois at Chicago and followed the principles set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [NIH Publication 85-23 (revised 1985), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD].

DRG Cultures. DRG neurons were cultured using methods previously outlined (García et al., 1996). In brief, DRGs were removed from newborn mouse pups (postnatal day 0), which had been anesthetized, decapitated, and placed in cold rodent physiological saline: (in mM) 146 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 11 d-glucose, pH 7.4. Isolated ganglia were incubated for 15 min at 37°C in 1 ml of PIPES-buffered saline: (in mM) 120 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 25 d-glucose, 20 PIPES, pH 7.0, containing 0.1% type XI trypsin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 0.01% (w/v) DNase I (Sigma). After incubation, tissue was rinsed three times with 1 to 2 ml of Neurobasal media (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing B27 protein supplement, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 60 µg/ml penicillin. Once washed, ganglia were triturated with a Pasteur pipette, followed by more vigorous trituration with a fire polished pipette. Dissociated cells were plated onto 35-mm dishes coated with poly(L-lysine) (1 mg/ml in 0.15 M boric acid, pH 8.4) and maintained at 37°C in humidified air (95% air and 5% CO2). Dissociated cells from a single animal were cultured onto several dishes and allowed to incubate overnight. All DRG cells were used in patch clamp experiments within 24 h of plating to reduce variability between cultures.

Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Cultures. Primary cultures of skeletal and cardiac muscle tissues were prepared using protocols previously described by Beam and Knudson (1988) and Bean and Rios (1989), respectively. Skeletal and cardiac muscle of newborn mice (at postnatal day 0) were removed and finely minced. The small pieces of muscle were incubated at 37°C for 30 to 45 min (skeletal muscle) or 30 min (cardiac muscle) in Ca2+-, Mg2+-free Rodent Ringer (in mM): 155 NaCl, 5 KCl, 11 glucose, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4, containing collagenase type IA (1 mg/ml) (Sigma). Dissociated muscle was triturated with a Pasteur pipette in plating medium (v/v, 80% Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 4.5 g/l glucose, 10% horse serum, and 10% calf serum). Large debris were removed from the solution by filtration and centrifugation, and a suspension of single myocytes was obtained. Cultures were maintained in a 37°C incubator with a gas mixture of 95% air and 5% CO2. Skeletal myotubes and cardiac myocytes were studied at 7 to 10 days or 1 to 2 days, respectively, after initial plating.

Calcium Current Measurements. Ca2+ currents were measured from DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells in culture using the whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique (Hamill et al., 1981). Data acquisition was synchronized with pulse generation by a PC-controlled 12-bit AD/DA Digidata 1200A converter (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Linear components of the membrane were subtracted digitally by appropriate scaling and subtracting control currents that do not activate ionic conductances (P/8 protocol). Membrane capacitance was measured by integrating the area under the capacity transient before series resistance compensation. To normalize for differences in total membrane area, current densities were calculated by dividing total current by the membrane capacitance of the cell and are expressed as pA/pF. Data acquisition and processing were performed using pClamp 7.0 software (Axon Instruments). Recording electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass and had resistances between 4 and 6 MOmega (DRGs and cardiac myocytes) or 1.6 and 2 MOmega (skeletal myotubes) when filled with a solution containing (in mM): 140 Cs-aspartate, 5 MgCl2, 10 Cs-EGTA, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 adjusted with CsOH. To avoid channel rundown, 5 mM Mg-ATP was added to the intracellular solution in DRG and cardiac myocyte preparations. The extracellular solution contained (in mM): 145 tetraethylammonium chloride, 10 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 0.001 tetrodotoxin, pH 7.4 adjusted with CsOH. GBP was kindly provided by Parke-Davis Research Laboratories (Warner-Lambert Co., Ann Arbor, MI). Currents in DRGs and cardiac myocytes were elicited with 250-ms test pulses delivered from a holding potential of -80 mV. Test pulses were applied in 10-mV increments from -60 to +60 mV. To inactivate low-voltage activated (LVA) currents, test pulses were preceded by a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV. Following the application of the prepulse, cells were briefly repolarized to -80 mV (cardiac and DRG cells) or -50 mV (skeletal myotubes) for 25 ms before a series of test depolarizations were run. The protocol for skeletal muscle cells was similar except for the following variations: the pulse duration was 100 ms, test pulses were run from -40 to +60 mV, and a 1-s prepulse to -30 mV was applied. To study the inactivation rate of the macroscopic Ca2+ current in DRG cells, individual traces were fitted to an exponential function. The fitting procedure started at the peak current amplitude and finished just before the end of the test pulse.

RT-PCR and cDNA Sequencing. Total RNA was obtained from DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells in culture after 1, 7, and 2 days, respectively, using a commercial kit (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). The RNA eluate was reverse-transcribed using 50 U of MuLV reverse transcriptase and reverse primers specific for alpha 2/delta genes 1, 2, and 3 (for sequences see below). PCR was performed with AmpliTaq DNA Polymerase (PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT) and gene specific primers 26 to 28 nucleotides in length. The total PCR volume was 100 µl, including 20 µl of RT reaction and 2.5 units of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase. PCR products were size-fractionated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA fragments of the expected lengths were subsequently isolated after gel electrophoresis and re-amplified using standard PCR techniques. To verify the identity of these PCR products, individual cDNAs were sequenced using an ABI Prism big dye terminator cycle sequencing reaction kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT), AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, and the reverse or forward primer. The primers for the alpha 2/delta -1 gene were the following: (forward) GGC CGG ATC CGC AAT TGA TCC TAA TGG and (reverse) GAA GGC TGC AGA TCA TTG CAG TAT TC. Primers for the alpha 2/delta -2 gene were the following: (forward) AAC TTC TTC TAC ACC CGA AAG and (reverse) TTA TAG GAT GCG TTC ACC GAG. The primer sequence for the alpha 2/delta -3 gene was taken from Klugbauer et al. (1999): (forward) GGC ACA GAT GTC CCA GTT AAA GA and (reverse) TGT ATA GTA GTA GTC ATT GGT CAT. These primers amplified DNA products between 300 and 480 bp. Positive controls for each of the three alpha 2/delta genes under study included a plasmid vector containing alpha 2/delta -1a cDNA (kindly provided by Drs. Klugbauer and Hofmann, Universität München, Munich, Germany), a plasmid vector containing rat alpha 2/delta -2 cDNA (kindly provided by Drs. Chu and Best, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), and brain tissue for alpha 2/delta -2 and alpha 2/delta -3 genes.

Statistical Analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (S.E.) and were analyzed using analysis of variance with repeated measures (ANOVA) or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) where appropriate. Significance for all data was set at p <=  0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 5.1 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Calcium Currents Recorded from DRG Cells and Effect of Gabapentin. The mechanism of action of GBP as an analgesic is currently unknown. GBP is unique because it specifically binds to the alpha 2/delta subunit of Ca2+ channels. Thus, our overall aim was to explore whether GBP acting on the alpha 2/delta subunit can modulate Ca2+ currents.

Typical Ca2+ currents recorded with 10 mM Ca2+ in the extracellular solution from DRG cells are shown in Fig. 1A. LVA currents (Fig. 1A, top) produced by T-type Ca2+ channels have smaller amplitudes than do high-voltage activated (HVA) currents and decay rapidly during the 250-ms test pulses. Traces with larger amplitude and slower decay correspond to HVA currents (Fig. 1A, bottom), which in DRG cells are mediated by N-, L-, P/Q-, and R-type Ca2+ channels (Scroggs and Fox, 1992). When test depolarizations are preceded by a prepulse to -50 mV, LVA currents are largely inactivated, whereas HVA currents remain practically unaffected (Fig. 1A, bottom). Figure 1B shows the current-voltage (I-V) relationships obtained by measuring the maximum amplitude of the currents normalized to cell capacitance for each test depolarization. I-V curves for control DRG cells shown in Fig. 1B were obtained in the absence and presence of a prepulse as indicated. Current density in cells stimulated with a prepulse are significantly smaller only at potentials <= -10 mV due to inactivation of the LVA current by the prepulse.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Typical calcium currents recorded from control DRG cells. A, LVA and HVA currents are shown in top and bottom, respectively, in the absence (left) and presence (right) of a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV. LVA currents, elicited with test pulses from -60 to -10 mV, were decreased, while HVA currents, elicited with test pulses from 0 to 60 mV, remained unaffected. B, I-V relationships of control DRG cells are demonstrated as a function of membrane potential. Currents obtained from control cells stimulated with a prepulse (black-diamond ) (n = 37) were significantly smaller (*p < 0.05) compared with those evoked in the absence of a prepulse (black-triangle) (n = 46) only at negative membrane potentials (-40 to -10 mV) due to inactivation of the LVA current.

To test the effect of GBP on Ca2+ currents, DRG cells were exposed to 10 µM GBP. This concentration is within the range found in serum of human patients and is therefore clinically relevant (Vollmer et al., 1986; McLean, 1994; Taylor et al., 1998; Jiang and Li, 1999). Because acute perfusion of GBP did not produce significant modifications, we incubated the cells with 10 µM GBP to allow for a better interaction of the drug with the alpha 2/delta subunit. Typical currents obtained from DRG cells treated with GBP for 60 min are shown in Fig. 2A. GBP was also present in the extracellular recording solution during these experiments. Using the same protocol outlined above, we observed that, similar to control cells, the LVA component of the macroscopic Ca2+ current is significantly reduced in the presence of a prepulse. However, unlike control cells, the HVA current density is also reduced (Fig. 2A, bottom). Figure 2B shows Ca2+ currents recorded at +20 mV from a GBP-treated cell in the absence and in the presence of a prepulse. From these traces, it is clearly seen that the current is smaller in the presence of a prepulse after the cell has been exposed to GBP. The average I-V relationship of Ca2+ currents obtained from all cells treated with GBP is shown in Fig. 2C in the presence and absence of a prepulse. We observed that in the presence of a prepulse, GBP significantly reduced the HVA component of Ca2+ currents by 25 ± 3.2% (n = 40) (range 22-27%) in DRG cells at membrane potentials between +10 and +50 mV. Interestingly, GBP does not cause any significant modification of Ca2+ currents in DRG cells in the absence of a prepulse.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Typical calcium currents recorded from 10 µM GBP-treated DRG cells. A, LVA and HVA components are shown in top and bottom, respectively, in the absence (left) and presence (right) of a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV. LVA currents are reduced in the presence of a prepulse, yet unlike control cells, HVA currents are also reduced. B, single calcium current elicited at +20 mV from GBP-treated cells, demonstrating differences in current amplitude in the presence and absence of a prepulse. C, I-V relationships of GBP-treated DRG cells are demonstrated as a function of membrane potential. LVA and HVA currents obtained from GPB-treated cells stimulated with a prepulse (black-diamond ) (n = 41) are significantly smaller (*p < 0.05) compared with absence of prepulse (black-triangle) (n = 44).

To compare Ca2+ currents from control and GBP-treated DRG cells, we plotted the current-voltage relationships obtained in the absence of a prepulse in Fig. 3A. No significant differences were detected between the groups under these conditions. However, as demonstrated in Fig. 3B, GBP causes a significant reduction of the HVA Ca2+ current at membrane potentials between 0 and +60 mV with the application of a prepulse. These results demonstrate three findings. First, that the reduction in the LVA region was due only to the presence of the prepulse because current densities were identical in GBP and control cells at negative membrane potentials. Second, GBP affects HVA Ca2+ channels after incubation with the drug, a phenomenon reminiscent of the action of ryanodine on the ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel (Rousseau et al., 1987; García et al., 1991). Third, the action of GBP was observed only after the membrane has been depolarized with the prepulse, a mechanism of action resembling the effect of dihydropyridines on L-type Ca2+ channels (Bean, 1984).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   I-V relationships of control and GBP-treated DRG cells. A, no prepulse: 10 µM GBP (black-triangle) (n = 43) did not affect current densities recorded with a regular test protocol in the absence of a depolarizing prepulse in comparison with control cells (black-down-triangle ) (n = 46). B, prepulse: current densities recorded in the presence of a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV demonstrates the reduction of current (*p < 0.05) with GBP treatment (black-triangle) (n = 41) in comparison with control DRG cells (black-down-triangle ) (n = 37). Note that only the HVA currents were reduced by the concomitant application of GBP and a prepulse and that no reduction of LVA currents due to GBP was observed.

Repetitive Stimulation Potentiates Reduction of Calcium Current in Gabapentin-Treated Cells. GBP has achieved success in the treatment of both pain and refractory epilepsy. In these conditions, neurons are subjected to repetitive depolarizations and Ca2+ channel activation. Thus, we tried to mimic the recurrent electrical activity by stimulating DRG cells with a train of 10 depolarizing pulses to +10 mV for 125 ms from a holding potential of -80 mV. The interval between these test depolarizations was set at 5, 10, 15, or 30 s. Figure 4A shows Ca2+ currents elicited with a train of stimuli at 10-s intervals in control (top) and GBP-treated (bottom) DRG cells. Ca2+ currents from control cells were unaffected by the train and the 1st and 10th traces essentially overlapped. In contrast, the amplitude of Ca2+ currents recorded from GBP-treated cells was progressively reduced by each subsequent pulse in a train, as indicated by the arrows.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Repetitive stimulation of DRG cells. A, DRG cells were stimulated 10 times to +10 mV for 125 ms from a holding potential of -80 mV. Sample DRG traces using a 10-s time interval are shown in control (top) and GBP-treated (bottom) cells. B, pulse intervals varied between 5 and 30 s and sustained current ratio (I10/I1) is shown as a function of interval duration. We observed a significant decrease (*p < 0.05) in current ratio at each interval examined in GBP-treated (black-triangle) (n = 12-23) compared with control cells () (n = 8-20).

To provide a more quantitative analysis with this protocol, we compared Ca2+ current amplitude elicited with the first (I1) and the last (I10) pulses and expressed this value as the ratio I10/I1. Hence, a ratio of 1 indicates that the current during the first pulse and the last pulse has the same amplitude, whereas a ratio <1 indicates that the current during the last pulse is smaller. The I10/I1 ratio for the maximum Ca2+ current was plotted as a function of interval duration in Fig. 4B. We observed that the current ratios obtained from GBP-treated DRG cells are significantly different from control cells at all interval durations examined (*p < 0.05 with ANCOVA). In addition, the ratios obtained with control cells at interval durations of 5 and 10 s are smaller than the current ratio at 30 s and reflect voltage-dependent inactivation of Ca2+ channels. Nevertheless, GBP is still able to further reduce current amplitude at these same intervals. This finding supports our results obtained with a single depolarizing prepulse and indicates that the action of GBP requires previous activation of Ca2+ channels to reduce Ca2+ influx.

Mechanism of Calcium Current Block by Gabapentin in DRG Cells. Block by Ca2+ channel ligands is a well described phenomenon in which drug binding and subsequent blockade is enhanced as channels are shifted to the inactivated state (Bean, 1984; Sanguinetti and Kass, 1984). We hypothesized that such a mechanism may be at play with GBP treatment since we observed a decrease of Ca2+ currents in DRG cells only in the presence of a depolarizing prepulse or with repetitive stimulation. Thus, to understand further how GBP may be affecting HVA Ca2+ channels, we performed a detailed analysis of Ca2+ current properties under several conditions.

We first analyzed the inactivation rate (tau inactivation) of Ca2+ currents as a function of membrane potential in the absence or presence of GBP. HVA Ca2+ currents were fit to an exponential function. In all cases, the best fit was obtained with a single exponential. Figure 5 shows the values of tau inactivation obtained in the absence of a prepulse (Fig. 5A, black-down-triangle ) or when the test pulses were preceded by a prepulse (Fig. 5B, ). The time constant of HVA Ca2+ current inactivation was not significantly altered with GBP treatment either in the absence (Fig. 5A, black-diamond ) or presence (Fig. 5B, black-triangle) of a prepulse. We then measured the inactivation rate of Ca2+ currents as a function of interval duration between pulses in repetitively stimulated cells. Similarly to the quantification of current reduction by GBP using this protocol (see Fig. 4B), we calculated the ratio of tau inactivation for the 10th and 1st pulse values (tau 10/tau 1). The ratio of tau inactivation is shown in Fig. 5C. In control cells, the tau 10/tau 1 ratio did not vary significantly from a value of 1 during any time interval examined, indicating that current inactivation was independent of interval duration. In contrast, in GBP-treated cells, the tau 10/tau 1 ratio was slightly decreased with the 10-s time interval and the decrease became significant with the 15-s interval. A decrease in the tau  ratio indicates that there is an enhanced rate of inactivation during the course of successive depolarization with GBP treatment.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time constant of inactivation (tau ) and fractional current in DRG cells. tau inactivation plotted as a function of membrane potential in DRG cells in the absence (A) and presence (B) of a prepulse. No differences were detected between control (black-down-triangle ) (n = 46) and GBP-treated cells (black-diamond ) (n = 44) (no prepulse) and control () (n = 37) and GBP-treated cells (black-triangle) (n = 41) (with prepulse). C, ratio of tau inactivation10/tau inactivation1 in control () (n = 8-20) and GBP-treated cells (black-triangle) (n = 12-23) as a function of interval duration during repetitive stimulation. The only observed reduction in the tau  ratio occurred at the 15-s interval duration in GBP-treated cells. D, fractional current demonstrated a significant decrease in current in GBP (black-triangle) (n = 8) with the second pulse (in the presence of a prepulse) and recovery of current during the third pulse (without a prepulse). No significant differences were detected in control cells () (n = 7) during the course of the three pulses. *p < 0.05 denotes significant difference compared with control cells. Fractional current plotted relative to pulse number in a representative cell [control, open symbols (E) and GBP-treated, closed symbols (F)]. Symbol shapes correspond to the same interval durations for both groups: 30-s (black-diamond ), 15-s (), 10-s (black-triangle), and 5-s (black-down-triangle ) interval durations. GBP decreased current amplitude both with successive depolarizations and as the interval duration decreased.

An increased effectiveness of Ca2+ current block with depolarization has been well documented for dihydropyridines (Bean, 1984). Nitrendipine decreases cardiac L-type Ca2+ currents more effectively when the membrane potential is less negative, indicating that this drug preferentially binds to the inactivated state of the channel. Accordingly, when the membrane potential is hyperpolarized, dihydropyridine binding is less and the block is smaller. The effect of nitrendipine on cardiac Ca2+ channels is reminiscent of the effect of GBP on DRG Ca2+ currents. We also observed that for GBP to produce a reduction of Ca2+ current, we had to depolarize the membrane potential with a prepulse. To study further this effect, we examined Ca2+ currents with a three-pulse protocol. The first and third pulses were single depolarizations to +20 mV; the second pulse, also to +20 mV, was preceded by a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV. Currents elicited during the second and third pulses were measured and compared with the current elicited during the first pulse. The fractional current was plotted as a function of test pulse (i.e., first, second, and third) in Fig. 5D. The graph demonstrates that no significant alterations in fractional current occurred with the series of test pulses in control cells. However, two important features were observed with GBP treatment: as expected, relative current was decreased during the application of the second test pulse, which included the depolarizing prepulse. In addition, the current returned toward basal levels with the application of the third pulse, which did not include the prepulse. Such a mode of action observed with these series of test protocols suggests that GBP binding may be affected by the state of the HVA Ca2+ channels. Furthermore, the recovery of Ca2+ current during the third test pulse indicates that a previous depolarization is required to produce the attenuation in Ca2+ current and suggests that the fraction of channels opened during the second pulse is smaller because the inactivated Ca2+ channels are more sensitive to GBP.

GBP also blocked Ca2+ currents by a use-dependent mechanism, as demonstrated in the last two panels of Fig. 5. The relative amplitude of Ca2+ currents recorded during successive test pulses in a train of 10 depolarizations to +10 mV is shown in Fig. 5, E and F, for representative control and GBP-treated cells, respectively. Currents from pulses 2 to 10 were normalized to the amplitude of the current during the first pulse. The different symbol shapes represent the time interval between the test pulses for both groups. The relative amplitude of the Ca2+ current in control conditions remained unchanged, while it slightly decreased for time intervals <= 15 s (Fig. 5E). In contrast, GBP enhanced the reduction of the fractional current both with successive depolarizations and as the interval duration decreased (Fig. 5F). Moreover, the effect of GBP was readily noticeable as early as the second or third pulses and it was clearly evident by the fifth pulse. From this pulse on, the percentage reduction of the current was smaller. This effect indicates that the build up of Ca2+ current block by GBP from pulse to pulse is frequency-dependent. Thus, our results indicate that GBP reduces Ca2+ currents by binding to the inactive state of the channel and by promoting accumulation of block during repetitive stimulation.

Calcium Currents from Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Cells. Skeletal and cardiac muscle cells possess only a single HVA Ca2+ current, mediated by L-type channels. Because alpha 2/delta subunits also form part of muscle L-type channels, we wanted to investigate whether GBP has a similar effect in muscle Ca2+ currents as that found in DRG cells. Presently, the effects of GBP on Ca2+ channels in muscle cells have not been examined. Figure 6A shows typical Ca2+ currents recorded from a skeletal myotube after 7 days in culture. Currents were elicited with 100-ms test pulses from -40 to 60 mV in the absence (left) and presence (right) of a 1-s prepulse to -30 mV. Figure 7A shows similar traces elicited with test depolarizations from -60 to 60 mV in a cardiac myocyte after 2 days in culture. The left panel in Fig. 7A shows currents in the absence of a prepulse, while the right panel illustrates currents in the presence of a prepulse to -50 mV. Comparison of all the current traces elicited from skeletal and cardiac muscle cells revealed that the presence of a prepulse did not cause significant alteration of the HVA Ca2+ current.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Ca2+ currents recorded from skeletal myotubes (SM). A, typical Ca2+ currents recorded from a control SM after 7 days in culture. Currents were elicited with 100-ms test pulses from -40 to 60 mV in the absence (left) and presence (right) of a 1-s prepulse to -30 mV. The presence of a prepulse did not significantly alter HVA current in these cells. B, I-V relationships from SM in the presence of a prepulse in 50 µM GBP-treated (black-triangle) (n = 24) and control cells () (n = 41). We observed a significant reduction in Ca2+ currents (*p < 0.05) when comparing GBP and control cells in the presence of a 1-s prepulse.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Ca2+ currents recorded from cardiac myocytes (CM). A, typical Ca2+ currents recorded from a control CM after 2 days in culture. Currents were elicited with 250-ms test pulses from -60 to 60 mV in the absence (left) and presence (right) of a 1-s prepulse to -50 mV. The presence of a prepulse did not significantly alter HVA current in these cells. B, I-V relationships from CM in the presence of a prepulse in 50 µM GBP-treated (black-diamond ) (n = 21) and control cells (black-triangle) (n = 23). We did not observe significant alterations in Ca2+ current densities when comparing GBP and control cells in the presence of a 1-s prepulse.

The concentration of GBP used in DRG cells (10 µM) did not significantly affect currents in muscle cells, and for this reason, we increased the concentration to 50 µM. Muscle cells were incubated with GBP for 1 h prior to Ca2+ current measurements. GBP was also maintained in the external recording solution. Figures 6B (skeletal myotubes) and 7B (cardiac myocytes) show the I-V relationships obtained in the presence of a prepulse. We observed that GBP significantly reduces Ca2+ currents in skeletal muscle in test pulses from 10 to 30 mV in comparison with control myotubes. In contrast, Ca2+ current amplitude in cardiac myocytes was not significantly altered by GBP, although there was a tendency to a decrease. Higher concentrations of GBP (up to 100 µM) did not produce additional reductions in Ca2+ currents in skeletal myotubes and failed to significantly alter cardiac myocytes currents (data not shown). Our data indicate that GBP differentially affects L-type Ca2+ channels in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells.

Identification of alpha 2/delta Subunit Isoforms in DRG and Muscle Cells. HVA channels in DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells all contain alpha 2/delta subunits. Using homogenates from adult mouse tissues, Angelotti and Hoffmann (1996) found that the alpha 2/delta -1 subunit mRNA is alternatively spliced in three regions. Splicing of the alpha 2/delta subunit gives rise to five isoforms, alpha 2/delta -1a to alpha 2/delta -1e. Brain expresses the "b" isoform, skeletal muscle expresses the "a" isoform, and heart expresses isoforms "b" to "e". Recently, two further genes encoding novel alpha 2/delta proteins (alpha 2/delta -2 and alpha 2/delta -3) have been identified (Klugbauer et al., 1999), but their presence in specific tissues in the mouse is not fully described. Therefore, we examined the relationship between alpha 2/delta gene expression and the reduction in current by GBP in DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells using RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing.

Total RNA was isolated from cells maintained in culture for the same length of time as cells used in Ca2+ current measurements. The different isoforms of the alpha 2/delta -1 gene could be detected by using a single pair of amplification primers that anneals outside the alternatively spliced regions. Specific primers for genes 2 and 3 were also used. A plasmid vector containing the alpha 2/delta -1a cDNA as well as cDNAs from genes 2 and 3 from adult mouse brain homogenates were used as positive controls for the RT-PCR experiments. Adult mouse brain was used as an additional control for genes 2 and 3 because it is known to express high levels of these proteins. Furthermore, in most cases we simultaneously searched for the three genes in cells from the same culture dish. We then isolated the PCR products and re-amplified individual cDNAs. After re-amplification, we sequenced each cDNA to confirm their identity. Sequences of each cDNA were then compared with the published sequences for each gene of interest [GenBank accession numbers U73483-U73487 (gene 1a-e), AF169633 (gene 2), and AJ010949 (gene 3)]. Figure 8A shows the PCR products obtained for gene 1 from skeletal myotubes (lane 2), DRG cells (lane 3), cardiac myocytes (lane 4), and control alpha 2/delta -1a cDNA (lane 5). RT-PCR results for gene 2 are demonstrated in Fig. 8B: skeletal myotubes (lane 2), DRG cells (lane 3), cardiac myocytes (lane 4), and adult brain homogenate (lane 5). Figure 8C shows the PCR products obtained for gene 3 from skeletal myotubes (lane 2), DRG cells (lane 3), and adult brain homogenate (lane 4). We found that each of the cell types examined expresses multiple isoforms of alpha 2/delta mRNA. However, the identity of the isoforms was different in the three cell types. Additionally, the isoforms found in neonatal cells differed from those found in adult tissues. DRG cells express only the b isoform of alpha 2/delta -1, as well as alpha 2/delta -2 and alpha 2/delta -3. In contrast, skeletal myotubes express multiple alpha 2/delta -1 isoforms (alpha 2/delta -1a, alpha 2/delta -1d, and alpha 2/delta -1e), alpha 2/delta -2, and alpha 2/delta -3. The d isoform of alpha 2/delta -1 always appeared as a faint band in the gels and was found in all skeletal myotube cultures, while the a and the e isoforms were found less frequently. Cardiac myocytes also expressed three isoforms arising from gene 1 (alpha 2/delta -1c, alpha 2/delta -1d, and alpha 2/delta -1e) and alpha 2/delta -2. However, alpha 2/delta -3 was not detected in cardiac myocytes, as opposed to DRG and skeletal myotubes. As seen from Fig. 8A, there were always more than one alpha 2/delta -1 isoform in skeletal myotubes and cardiac myocytes.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   RT-PCR of skeletal, DRG, and cardiac cells. Expected base pair sizes for PCR amplification are listed for each of the gene 1 isoforms. A, alpha 2/delta -1: skeletal muscle (S) possessed isoforms alpha 2/delta -1a (488 bp), alpha 2/delta -1d (416 bp, appearing always as a faint band), alpha 2/delta delta -1e (431 bp) (lane 2); DRG cells (D) expressed isoform alpha 2/delta -1b (452 bp) (lane 3); cardiac muscle (C) expressed three isoforms: alpha 2/delta -1c (437 bp), alpha 2/delta -1d (416 bp), and alpha 2/delta -1e (431 bp) (lane 4). Control cDNA (alpha 2/delta -1a, 488 bp) is shown in lane 5. B, alpha 2/delta -2: skeletal myotube (SM), DRG, and cardiac myocyte (CM) cells each possessed gene 2, as shown in lanes 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Control RT-PCR experiment using adult mouse brain homogenates (B) is shown in lane 5. C, alpha 2/delta -3: SM and DRG cells possessed gene 3, as shown in lanes 2 and 3, respectively. CM cells did not possess gene 3. Control RT-PCR experiment using adult mouse brain homogenates (B) is shown in lane 4.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

To explain the clinical efficacy of GBP in vivo, it has been proposed that GBP may affect ion channels and therefore modulate neuronal excitability. Among ion channels, the most likely candidates affected by GBP are Ca2+ channels since isolation of the GBP-binding protein from brain microsomes identified the alpha 2/delta subunit as a target for this drug (Gee et al., 1996). The partial amino-terminal region of the GBP-binding protein was identical to the L-type Ca2+ channel alpha 2/delta -1 subunit of adult rabbit skeletal muscle (Hamilton et al., 1989). However, the effect of GBP on neuronal Ca2+ currents is controversial. To date, there is only one report showing a Ca2+ current reduction with GBP of up to 34% in rat pyramidal neocortical cells, 12% in striatum medium spiny cells, and 10% in large globus pallidus cells (Stefani et al., 1998). In contrast, GBP did not modify Ca2+ currents recorded from human hippocampal granulose cells (Schumacher et al., 1998). This apparent controversy may be explained by the fact that tritium-labeled GBP binding is higher in the cortex and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell layer (Taylor et al., 1998) and because alpha 2/delta -1 is predominant in cortex and very little is present in striatum and globus pallidus, as determined by Klugbauer et al. (1999). This indicates the presence of an exquisite sensitivity to GBP that is dependent on neuronal type and/or localization. Because GBP has been extensively used as an analgesic agent, we selected DRG neurons, the mediators of pain perception, as a model cell.

In this article, we demonstrated that 10 µM GBP reduced HVA Ca2+ current amplitude in DRG cells. This concentration is within the clinically effective range (10-100 µM) found in the serum of human patients (Vollmer et al., 1986; McLean, 1994; Taylor et al., 1998; Jiang and Li, 1999). Interestingly, the effect of GBP was noticeable only after the cells were incubated with the drug and only after the membrane was depolarized with either a prepulse or a train of stimuli. Our data show that the effect of GBP depends on the state of the channel and suggest that it preferentially binds to inactivated Ca2+ channels. In addition, our data show that the block of HVA Ca2+ currents by GBP depends on the frequency of stimulation and that it accumulates from pulse to pulse during repetitive stimulation. Inactivation of Ca2+ currents during test depolarizations (tau inactivation) was affected to a lesser extent since the only significant change was observed during the 15-s interval duration in the repetitive stimulation protocol. Taken together, we can hypothesize that GBP reduces the macroscopic Ca2+ current by binding more effectively to the inactive state of the channels and by a use-dependent mechanism. The action of GBP is remarkable and novel since it exerts its effects on Ca2+ channels through the alpha 2/delta subunit, while all the other Ca2+ channel blockers bind to the alpha 1 subunit.

The decrease of Ca2+ currents caused by GBP (an average of ~25%) is comparable to the effect of other anticonvulsant agents that modulate Ca2+ influx such as phenytoin and carbamazepine (Schumacher et al., 1998). These findings may explain the efficacy of GBP as an analgesic, since DRG neurons are depolarized during pain perception, and implicates the ability of the alpha 2/delta subunit to modulate Ca2+ channels with a subsequent reduction in neurotransmitter release. Our results also agree with a GBP-induced reduction of high-frequency action potentials from mouse spinal cord and neocortical neurons reported by Wamil and McLean (1994). Trains of pulses potentiated the effect of GBP, while hyperpolarization of the cells reversed the effect. Thus, our study and the work of Wamil and McLean (1994) reveal a use-dependent mechanism for the attenuation of Ca2+ currents by GBP. These investigators additionally observed that the effect of GBP was not immediate and the IC50 for a 10- to 60-min incubation was 19 µM, similar to the concentration and time used in the present study. The need for incubation in the present study and Wamil and McLean's (1994) work demonstrate that the action of GBP resembles the interaction of ryanodine with the ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. For example, when ryanodine is applied to cells or single channels incorporated in lipid bilayers, the slow association rate delays drug binding. Therefore, the preparations must be incubated in ryanodine for several minutes to observe an effect. In fact, it has recently been reported that maximum GBP binding to solubilized cerebral cortex membranes takes about 60 min at 30°C and more than 2 h at 4°C due to slow association and dissociation rate constants (Taylor and Bonhaus, 2000).

We explored the effect of GBP on muscle cells because they possess a less diverse population of Ca2+ channels than do neuronal cells and because the GBP has no side effects on muscle. In skeletal and cardiac muscle cells, the L-type Ca2+ channel is the only component of HVA Ca2+ currents. Skeletal myotubes inconsistently express an LVA Ca2+ current mediated by T-type channels. Experiments with muscle cells demonstrated that GBP caused a reduction only in skeletal myotubes and not in cardiac myocytes. Similar to the effects in DRG cells, Ca2+ currents in skeletal myotubes were reduced only when the test pulse was preceded by a depolarizing prepulse and after the cells were incubated for 1 h in the presence of the drug. However, Ca2+ currents from skeletal myotubes were less sensitive to GBP than were DRGs, as a concentration 5 times higher was required for current reduction. A possible explanation for the differential effect of GBP is the fact that DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells express different isoforms of the alpha 2/delta subunit, as evidenced by our RT-PCR experiments. Comparing the presence of alpha 2/delta isoforms between neonatal and adult tissues in each of the three cell types reveals that muscle cells are more variable at an early stage of development than are DRG cells. The presence of alpha 2/delta -3 as well as multiple isoforms of alpha 2/delta -1 derived from skeletal myotubes differs significantly from adult skeletal muscle, which does not express alpha 2/delta -3 and contains only isoform a of alpha 2/delta -1. The difference in expression of alpha 2/delta subunit gene isoforms between neonatal and adult mouse tissues may represent developmental regulation of alpha 2/delta genes. Furthermore, the observed differences in alpha 2/delta subunit isoform expression between DRG, skeletal, and cardiac muscle cells may account for the lack of effect of GBP on Ca2+ currents recorded from cardiac myocytes. GBP may preferentially bind to and affect different isoforms of the alpha 2/delta subunit, which then alters Ca2+ currents. In addition to the variability in alpha 2/delta isoform expression, the three cell types used in our study possess different alpha 1 isoforms, the pore-forming and voltage-sensing subunit. Neuronal cell HVA currents are comprised of multiple Ca2+ channels mediated by N, L, P/Q, and R channels (Scroggs and Fox, 1992), each with different pore-forming subunits and therefore varying kinetic properties. The pore-forming subunits in HVA channels from skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle are each composed of a single isoform, alpha 1S and alpha 1C, respectively. Thus, another possibility to explain the differential effect of GBP on Ca2+ currents is that the pharmacological activity of GBP in reducing Ca2+ influx may not be strictly dependent upon the highly variable alpha 2/delta subunit isoforms but may occur through the specific interactions of the various alpha 1 and alpha 2/delta subunits, which together act to modulate the biophysical properties of these channels.

In our experiments, the predominant effect in neurons was mediated by a ~25% reduction in Ca2+ currents. Thus, our experiments suggest that pain sensation may be modulated by Ca2+ currents and that the analgesic effect of GBP is possibly mediated by its action on Ca2+ channels through the alpha 2/delta -1 subunit. In addition, we also determined that depolarizing prepulses enhance GBP's actions, which is a likely explanation for its clinical efficacy.

    Acknowledgments

We thank Tord D. Alden, M.D. for help with the statistical analysis and Kelly D. García, D.V.M., Ph.D. for comments on the manuscript.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 26, 2001.

Received for publication September 21, 2000.

This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (J.G.). K.A. was partially supported by a training grant from the National Institutes of Health (T32 DK07739).

Send reprint requests to: Jesús García, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, 900 S. Ashland Ave. M/C 902, Chicago, IL 60607. E-mail: garmar{at}uic.edu

    Abbreviations

GBP, gabapentin; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; VGCC, voltage-gated calcium channels; LVA, low-voltage activated; HVA, high-voltage activated; I-V, current-voltage; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; tau inactivation, inactivation rate; bp, base pairs.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/01/2972-0727-0735$03.00
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow