![]() |
|
|
Vol. 294, Issue 2, 539-547, August 2000
2A-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in Chinese Hamster
Ovary Cells: l-Isoproterenol Selectively Activates
Gs1
Departments of Pharmacology (R.R.N., S.M.W., C.B.B.) and Internal Medicine/Hypertension (R.R.N.) and Biophysics Research Division (R.R.N.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we investigated the hypothesis of agonist-directed
trafficking of receptor signaling for the
2A-adrenergic receptor (
2A-AR).
2A-ARs couple to both
Gs and Gi to stimulate or inhibit adenylyl
cyclase activity. Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cell lines expressing the
porcine
2A-AR at high (
2A-H) and low (
2A-L) levels were used to estimate the relative
efficacies (R.e.s) of a series of agonists for the
Gs and Gi pathways. Gs-mediated responses were measured after pertussis toxin treatment to inactivate Gi in
2A-H, whereas Gi responses
were measured in
2A-L, where Gs responses
were absent. The full agonist UK-14,304 showed a large receptor reserve
for Gi responses in
2A-H but little receptor reserve for Gs responses in
2A-H or for
Gi responses in
2A-L. With the exception of
l-isoproterenol (ISO), all agonists showed similar
R.e.s at the
2A-AR for Gs and
Gi responses, with rank orders of R.e.s as
follows: l-epinephrine = l-norepinephrine = UK-14,304 > p-aminoclonidine
BHT-920
BHT-933 > clonidine = p-iodoclonidine
xylazine
guanabenz. Interestingly, ISO had the highest efficacy at the
2A-AR for activating Gs versus
Gi (9-fold higher); however, it had low potency for both.
By several criteria, the ISO response was mediated by the
2A-AR, supporting the hypothesis of agonist-directed
trafficking of receptor signaling or agonist-specific G protein
selectivity. In contrast, the apparent Gi pathway
selectivity of oxymetazoline appears to be mediated by an endogenous
serotonergic receptor. It is intriguing that a classic
-AR agonist
that activates Gs through
2-ARs also appears to produce a Gs-selective conformation of the
Gi-coupled
2A-AR.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
hypothesis of agonist-directed trafficking of receptor signaling
(ADTRS; Kenakin, 1995
) predicts that when a receptor signals through
two or more independent signal transduction pathways, the relative
efficacies (R.e.s) of a series of agonists may differ for
the pathways. This contrasts with the classic concept that intrinsic
efficacy is a solely agonist-dependent pharmacodynamic parameter
(Furchgott, 1966
). This hypothesis builds on the ideas that a receptor
can exist in distinct states (or conformations) and that the ability of
those states to activate different G protein types or subtypes may differ.
The idea of ADTRS led to the development of the "N-state receptor
models," in which the receptor is assumed to exist in N states that
may be "inactive" (R) or "active" (R*, R**, etc.). As a
special case of the N-state receptor models, Leff et al. (1997)
developed a mathematical model for three receptor states that
accommodates the concept of ADTRS. They were able to predict differential R.e.s from this model. In this regard, Berg et
al. (1998)
recently reported strong evidence for the existence of pathway-dependent R.e.s for a series of five agonists at
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and
5-HT2C receptors when looking at the
phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 signal
transduction pathways. They also pointed out that for ADTRS to be
possible, it is critical that the independent pathways diverge at the
receptor/G protein level (e.g., receptor activates two G proteins
independently, leading to the transduction of the stimulus through two
separate effector pathways) and not downstream from a common G
protein (e.g., receptor activates a G protein such as
Gq that subsequently activates phospholipase C,
which in turn activates two independent effector pathways via release
of inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol).
According to the three-state model by Leff et al. (1997)
, two cases can
be distinguished. The first is when the two effector pathways result in
two independently measurable responses, as in the work of Berg et al.
(1998)
mentioned earlier. Second, the two pathways can diverge and
eventually recombine to modulate one measurable response (e.g.,
regulation of adenylyl cyclase by both Gs and
Gi proteins). If one pathway is isolated by
inactivating the other selectively, R.e.s can be determined
for the active pathway. It should now be possible to obtain an estimate
of the R.e.s for each pathway independently, and
theoretically their R.e.s may be different.
2A-Adrenergic receptors
(
2A-ARs) have previously been shown to
activate three G proteins: Gi,
Gs, and Gq (Eason et al., 1992
; Chabre et al., 1994
). The former study reported a pertussis toxin-insensitive stimulation of cAMP accumulation in Chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cells expressing high amounts of
2-AR. In addition to functional studies,
direct, agonist-dependent, physical coupling of the
2A-AR to Gs was
demonstrated (Eason et al., 1992
). For the Gq
coupling, Chabre et al. (1994)
used human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells transiently transfected with the porcine
2A-AR and murine
G
q or rat
G
s. They estimated that the efficiency of coupling of the
2A-AR to
endogenous Gi was approximately 1000 times higher
than that to Gs or Gq.
Although no conclusive evidence was provided to support the hypothesis
that ADTRS may occur for
2-ARs, three previous
reports suggested such a possibility. Using CHO cells expressing the
human
2A-AR (
2C10),
Eason et al. (1994)
showed a rank order of intrinsic activities of
agonists for the Gs signal transduction pathway to be epinephrine = norepinephrine = UK-14,304 > BHT-933 > BHT-920 > oxymetazoline. For the
Gi signal transduction pathway, they found that
the intrinsic activities of these agonists were remarkably similar.
They did not, however, take into account receptor reserve, so the true
relative efficacies of these drugs cannot be determined from their
data. Kenakin (1995)
found that oxymetazoline selectively activated
Gi (compared with Gs) in
CHO cells stably transfected with
2A-AR. Yang
and Lanier (1999)
found differential regulation of
Go and Gi by clonidine and
epinephrine. A potential mechanism for ADTRS has been suggested by
reports that different amino acid residues of the
2A-AR are required for
Gi and Gs activation (Eason and Liggett, 1996
; Wade et al., 1999
).
In the current study, we asked whether convincing evidence for the
ADTRS hypothesis could be found for the regulation of
Gi and Gs by the
2A-AR. To account for the difference in spare
receptors (for a full agonist) when measuring Gs
or Gi responses, we used two CHO-K1 cell lines:
one expressing the porcine
2A-AR at high levels and the other expressing the porcine
2A-AR at low levels. We estimated the
R.e.s for a series of agonists for the
Gs and Gi signal
transduction pathways, measuring [3H]cAMP
accumulation as the response. Interestingly, l-isoproterenol (ISO), but not oxymetazoline, exhibits ADTRS.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Radiochemicals. [2-3H]Adenine (21-25 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Life Science (Piscataway, NJ). [3H]Yohimbine (74.5-78 Ci/mmol) was obtained from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).
Other Chemicals.
cAMP, ATP, 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine
(IBMX), l-epinephrine-(+)-bitartrate, ISO, and yohimbine HCl
were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). UK-14,304,
p-iodoclonidine HCl, l-norepinephrine bitartrate,
BHT-933 dihydrochloride, xylazine HCl, and
(S)-(
)-cyanopindolol hemifumarate were obtained from
Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA). Clonidine HCl and
p-aminoclonidine were purchased from Boehringer Ingelheim
(Ingelheim, Germany). Guanabenz acetate was obtained from Wyeth
Laboratories (Philadelphia, PA). BHT-920 Cl2 was
purchased from Dr. Karl Thaomae Inc. (Biberach, Germany). Oxymetazoline HCl was purchased from Schering Corporation (Bloomfield, NJ). Propranolol HCl was purchased from Ayerst Laboratories Inc. (New York,
NY). Benextramine tetrahydrochloride monohydrate was obtained from
Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Pertussis toxin (PTX) was obtained from List
Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). Forskolin was obtained from
Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp. (San Diego, CA). LipoFECTAMINE and
geneticin (G418) were obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Fluorescein-conjugated 12CA5 anti-hemagglutinin monoclonal antibody was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN).
2A-AR Expressing Cell Lines
In this study, we used several cell lines. The first are CHO-K1
cell lines expressing high concentrations of either the wild type or
one of two mutant porcine
2A-ARs (Wade et al.,
1999
). All receptor constructs contain an amino-terminal HA tag. The receptor concentrations were estimated as 19 ± 2 pmol/mg membrane protein for the wild-type
2A-AR (clone 1 designated
2A-H in this report), 10 ± 1 pmol/mg for the R3 mutant
2A-AR (mutating RWRGR to AWAGA at residues 361-365 of the receptor, designated
2A-R3 in this report), and 36 ± 3 pmol/mg for the B2 mutant (mutating basic residues 368-371 of the
membrane-proximal i3c region to form BXAA, designated
2A-B2 in this report). The
2A-R3 and
2A-B2 mutations disrupt coupling to Gs and
GI, respectively (Wade et al., 1999
).
For the purpose of this study, we isolated two additional CHO-K1 cell
lines expressing a low concentration of the wild-type porcine
2A-AR. This was done with another flow
cytometry sorting selection from the original transformation of Wade et
al. (1999)
from which the WT (clone 1) had been isolated. The cell line
expressing the lowest concentration of the
2A-AR, as determined by
[3H]yohimbine binding
(Bmax ~1 pmol/mg, clone 101), was
selected for this study (designated
2A-L).
This line exhibited a similar EC50 value for the
dose-response curve of UK-14,304 through the Gi
pathway as did
2A-H through the
Gs pathway, simplifying comparison of the
Gs and Gi responses. The
Neo cells containing the selection plasmid but no
2A-AR vector were used as controls.
Measurement of Whole-Cell [3H]cAMP Accumulation
CHO-K1 cells were maintained in Ham's F-12 medium with 10%
fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2. Selection for stable
expression was maintained by the addition of 0.4 mg/ml G418 (active).
[3H]cAMP accumulation was determined in whole
cells in 24-well plates as described by Wade et al. (1999)
, adding 1 µCi/well [3H]adenine and, when indicated, 100 ng/ml PTX for at least 18 h before the assay. Cells were then
washed once with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), after
which the assay was initiated by adding DMEM with 1 mM IBMX and 30 µM
forskolin and the appropriate drug or drugs. After a 20-min incubation,
the medium was aspirated, and the reaction was terminated with 1 ml of
5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) containing 1 mM ATP and 1 mM cAMP. The
acid-soluble nucleotides were separated on Dowex and alumina columns as
described by Salomon et al. (1974)
. The cAMP accumulation was
normalized by dividing the [3H]cAMP counts by
the total [3H]nucleotide counts. The control
percent conversion of ATP to cAMP was 10 to 14% for non-PTX-treated
cells (n = 81) and 3.7 to 7.4% for PTX-treated cells
(n = 66) and did not vary significantly for high, low,
or no
2A-AR expression. This percent
conversion value was then divided by the corresponding value obtained
with only IBMX and forskolin and no drug (to calculate percent of control).
Ligand Binding Assays
The Ki values of the
2A-AR agonists were determined from
competition binding curves in whole cells against 5 nM
[3H]yohimbine
(KD = 3 nM). The buffer used in these
binding studies was comparable with that used for measuring cAMP
accumulation. Cells were plated and incubated as before but without
[3H]adenine and PTX. Cells were then washed
once with OptiMEM, after which the assay was initiated by adding
OptiMEM with 5 nM [3H]yohimbine and different
concentrations of the testing drug. After a 30-min incubation, the
medium was aspirated, the cells were washed twice, and the reaction was
terminated with 1 ml of 5% TCA and allowed to stand for at least 30 min to allow the cells to lyse. The TCA from each well was then
transferred directly into scintillation vials using transfer pipettes,
and the [3H]yohimbine was counted.
Pharmacological Receptor Inactivation
Benextramine was used as an irreversible competitive antagonist
of
2A-ARs. The cells were incubated overnight
in 24-well plates as described earlier. The cells were then washed once
with DMEM and incubated with 0, 1, 10, or 100 µM benextramine in PBS (containing 0.8% NaCl, 0.02% KCl, 0.09%
Na2HPO4, and 0.02%
KH2PO4) for 20 min at room
temperature. This was followed by two washes with DMEM. With the second
wash, the cells were let to stand in the DMEM for at least 5 min to
ensure that all unbound benextramine was removed. The measurement of
[3H]cAMP accumulation then proceeded as
described earlier.
Data Analysis
Functional data, except where indicated otherwise, were obtained from three or more independent and comparable experiments, each in triplicate, and expressed as mean ± S.E.
Analyses of dose-response curves were made with the nonlinear least-squares method of the computer program Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), setting the Hill slope factor at 1. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. To verify statistical significance of differences between mean values, the nonparametric Student's t test was used. After the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison, a value of P < .05 was taken as statistically significant.
The relative intrinsic activity (RIA) was determined from functional
data and expressed as the maximal response
(Emax) of an agonist relative to that
of the full agonist UK-14,304. The apparent dissociation constant of an
agonist-receptor complex [KA(app.)],
and the fraction of receptors still functional after partial receptor
alkylation (q) was estimated from Furchgott analysis of
dose-response curves of UK-14,304 before and after partial receptor
alkylation (Furchgott, 1966
).
Because there appeared to be a small receptor reserve remaining
for the full agonists (i.e., l-epinephrine,
l-norepinephrine, UK-14,304) in
2a-L for Gi and
2a-H for Gs responses,
we estimated the R.e.s of full agonists as follows:
|
|
This analysis for full agonists is similar to that used by Van Rossum
(1966)
and Van den Brink (1977)
to define a "corrected" intrinsic
activity constant
S or by Venter (1997)
to
define the efficacy-related parameter eES. It
assumes that 50% of the functionally coupled receptors are occupied at
a concentration of agonist equal to the
Ki value and that the relationship
between receptor occupation and stimulus is linear over the range
studied. Because the maximal stimulus should be proportional to twice
the stimulus at the Ki, we also define
Smax to equal two times the response
(linearly related to stimulus) obtained at the
E50. Supporting this assumption of linearity, the
Smax/Emax
value for UK-14,304 determined in this manner is also similar to the
Smax/Emax
value from the q value estimated from Furchgott analysis
before and after partial receptor alkylation (see above), where
Emax was obtained before partial receptor alkylation. In this case,
Smax was estimated from
Emax'/q, where
Emax' represents the reduced
Emax after partial receptor alkylation.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2A-ARs Expressed in
2A-H and
2A-L Are Comparable Pharmacologically.
From
saturation binding with [3H]yohimbine, the
Bmax values in
2A-H and
2A-L cells
were 2.0 ± 0.1 × 106 and 0.27 ± 0.09 × 106
2A-ARs
per cell, respectively. Thus,
2A-H cells
express ~10 times more of the porcine
2A-AR
than
2A-L cells. The
pKD values for yohimbine in
2A-H and
2A-L were
similar, being 8.57 ± 0.06 and 8.57 ± 0.24, respectively.
2A-H cells (
PTX) is ~1000-fold lower than
the Ki value determined from
[3H]yohimbine competition (Table
1), suggesting that there is a large
receptor reserve. The EC50 value of the
dose-response curve for
2A-L (
PTX) is 2 logs
higher than that in
2A-H, which is expected
with the lower receptor expression and therefore smaller receptor
reserve for the
2A-L.
|
|
2A-H (
PTX), at concentrations of
UK-14,304 of greater that 10
8 M, a modest
stimulation of adenylyl cyclase is seen, confirming the
Gs protein activation previously reported (Eason
et al., 1992
2A-L
(
PTX), the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase is not observed. After PTX
treatment, which inhibits receptor activation of
Gi, only the Gs-mediated
stimulation of adenylyl cyclase can be seen in
2A-H (Fig. 1, top). However, even in the presence of PTX, the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase is not evident in
2A-L (+PTX). Thus, the inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase in
2A-L (
PTX) will not be
functionally antagonized by Gs-mediated
stimulation, as may be occurring in
2A-H
(
PTX). The 120-fold difference in the EC50
values for the dose-response curves of UK-14,304 for the
Gs versus the Gi pathways
[i.e., in
2A-H (+PTX) versus
2A-H (
PTX), respectively] suggests a much
more efficient coupling of the
2A-AR to
Gi than to Gs. It should
also be noted that stimulation of adenylyl cyclase in
2A-H (+PTX) occurs at nearly the same concentration of UK-14,304 as does inhibition in
2A-L (
PTX). Although not a prerequisite for
comparison, this renders these two cell lines ideal for comparison of
Gs- and Gi-mediated responses.
We investigated the receptor reserve for UK-14,304 in
2A-H (±PTX) and
2A-L
(
PTX) by irreversible inhibition of
2A-ARs by benextramine. The EC50 value for the
dose-response curves in
2A-H (
PTX) before
benextramine treatment is more than 1000-fold lower than the
Ki value for UK-14,304 binding in
cells, and the curves are shifted progressively to the right in a
parallel fashion by increasing concentrations of benextramine (Fig.
2B). Even 100 µM benextramine for 20 min is not sufficient to eliminate receptor reserve as the
Emax is maintained and the
EC50 is still ~10-fold lower than the
Ki value. The
EC50 values for the dose-response curves in
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L
(
PTX) before benextramine treatment are ~6- and ~4-fold lower,
respectively, than the Ki value (Fig. 2, A and C). With 1 µM benextramine treatment, these curves are shifted to the right with EC50 values comparable
with the Ki value. The
Emax is also decreased, indicating
that the receptor concentration is decreased sufficiently to eliminate
receptor reserve with even the smallest concentration of benextramine.
Results from Furchgott analysis of the data in
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L
(
PTX) are presented in Table 1.
|
Binding Data for Selected
2A-AR Agonists.
According to classic theory, ~95% receptor occupation, and therefore
Emax, is expected at a concentration
of 20× Ki of an agonist. Thus, RIAs
can be estimated from these single maximal concentrations of a series
of agonists. Therefore, we calculated the
Ki values for a series of
2A-AR agonists from competition binding
against 5 nM [3H]yohimbine (Table
2). All competition binding curves,
except for l-epinephrine, l-norepinephrine, and
clonidine, were monophasic and could be explained by a single binding
site. The competition binding curves for l-epinephrine,
l-norepinephrine, and clonidine were biphasic with
high-affinity pKi values being 6.19, 5.25, and 9.18, respectively (and 57, 41, and 23% of the
[3H]yohimbine displaced, respectively) and
low-affinity pKi values being 4.07, 3.58, and 7.07, respectively. For l-epinephrine and l-norepinephrine, the biphasic competition binding curves
can be explained by their hydrophilic properties, presumably hindering access to nonsurface
2A-ARs. The high-affinity
pKi would therefore be expected to
describe binding to the surface receptors. After 1 or 10 µM
benextramine treatment, the pEC50 values of the
dose-response curves of l-epinephrine (data not shown)
corresponded with the high-affinity
pKi value as expected. Also, the
high-affinity pKi values for
l-epinephrine and l-norepinephrine were closest
to the pEC50 values measured from functional
dose-response curves in
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L (
PTX) (see later). However, for the partial agonist clonidine, the pEC50 values from
functional dose-response curves (data not shown) corresponded best with
the low-affinity pKi. We cannot
explain the small fraction of high-affinity clonidine binding sites
observed here.
|
Comparison of Gs- and Gi-Mediated
Signaling.
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L (
PTX) were used to estimate RIAs of a
series of full and partial agonists for the Gs-
and Gi-mediated modulation of adenylyl cyclase
activity. Because the
2A-AR couples more
effectively to Gi than to
Gs, [3H]cAMP production
was measured in the lower receptor expressing
2A-L cells to examine the
Gi pathway and in the higher receptor expressing
2A-H cells treated with PTX (+PTX) for the
Gs pathway. Neo cells without the porcine
2A-AR were used as controls.
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L (
PTX) are presented in Fig.
3. Of the agonists studied,
l-epinephrine, l-norepinephrine, and UK-14,304
behaved as full agonists and BHT-920 behaved as a partial agonist for
both the Gs- and
Gi-mediated responses. These agonists showed no
significant differences in the relative maximum responses between the
Gi and Gs pathways.
However, oxymetazoline showed selectivity for inducing signaling
through the Gi pathway compared with the other
partial agonist BHT-920. Very interestingly, ISO showed clear
selectivity for inducing signaling through the Gs
pathway.
|
2A-ARs. For this purpose, we used the control
Neo cells without the porcine
2A-AR to study
dose-response curves for oxymetazoline and ISO. It can be seen in Fig.
4B that the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by oxymetazoline also occurs in Neo cells, suggesting that this
response is mediated by a receptor type other than the
2A-AR. Because the inhibition of adenylyl
cyclase is not seen after PTX treatment of Neo cells, this receptor is
signaling through a PTX-sensitive G protein (e.g.,
Gi). The Gs-mediated
stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by oxymetazoline, however, is mediated
by
2A-ARs, because no response is seen in Neo
cells (Fig. 4A). It is clear from Fig. 4C that ISO is inducing its
Gs selective response via
2A-ARs because no response is seen in Neo
cells. The Gi response to ISO is small but also
appears to be mediated by the
2A-AR.
|
2A-H (+PTX) and
2A-L
(
PTX) was also extended. By assuming that an
Emax is obtained at a concentration of
agonist 20 times the Ki value as also
used by Berg et al. (1998)
|
ISO Responses Are Blocked by
2A Antagonist Yohimbine
but Not by
-Blocker Propranolol.
To further verify that the
Gs response seen with ISO in
2A-H (+PTX) is mediated by interaction with
2A-ARs, we obtained data for dose-response
curves for ISO in the absence and presence of the
-AR antagonist
propranolol (because ISO is a classic
-AR agonist) or the
2-AR antagonist yohimbine. From Fig.
5A, it can be seen that 1 µM
propranolol does not inhibit the response by ISO, whereas 1 µM
yohimbine greatly inhibits this response. This would exclude the
contribution of any endogenous
-ARs to the observed stimulation of
adenylyl cyclase by ISO. It also confirms that the
Gs response is mediated by
2A-ARs, in agreement with data from the Neo
cells. Results for the Gi response suggest the same with regard to the interaction of ISO with
2A-ARs (Fig. 5B).
|
Oxymetazoline but Not UK-14,304 Responses Are Blocked by
5-HT1 Antagonist (
)-Cyanopindolol.
Figure
6 shows dose-response curves of UK-14,304
and oxymetazoline in the presence and absence of 100 nM
(
)-cyanopindolol in
2A-L (
PTX). The
Gi response of oxymetazoline, but not
that of UK-14,304, was antagonized by 100 nM (
)-cyanopindolol. The estimated pA2 value is 8.44, indicating a KB value of ~3.6 nM for
(
)-cyanopindolol for the receptor involved. These data suggest that
5-HT1 receptors may mediate much of the
Gi response of oxymetazoline (see Discussion).
Also, 100 nM propranolol did not shift the response of oxymetazoline to
the right, excluding any contribution of
-ARs to the response. Thus,
the apparent ADTRS by oxymetazoline is an artifact of endogenous
receptors, whereas that of ISO reflects a true property of the
2A-AR.
|
Estimating Relative Efficacies of Agonists.
Because
EC50/Ki ratios
for l-epinephrine, l-norepinephrine, ISO, and
UK-14,304 in
2A-H (+PTX) and for
l-epinephrine, l-norepinephrine, and UK-14,304 in
2A-L (
PTX) suggest a small degree of
receptor reserve for these full agonists, R.e. values cannot
be estimated directly from Emax
values. This was further confirmed from dose-response curves of
UK-14,304 before and after benextramine treatment (Fig. 2). Another
complicating factor was the significant stimulation of adenylyl cyclase
by l-epinephrine and l-norepinephrine seen in
control Neo (±PTX) cells at concentrations of 20 times the Ki value (Table 3).
2A-AR-mediated responses. Therefore, an
alternative for measuring R.e.s would be to use submaximal
responses at concentrations of the agonists equal to their
Ki values (50% receptor occupation)
as a measure of half-maximal stimulus and to calculate relative
Smax values from twice this response
(see Experimental Procedures, Data Analysis).
One possible problem with this approach to keep in mind is the
relationship between receptor occupation and response. This matter was
clarified by estimating the KA(app.)
values (see Table 1) from Furchgott analysis of the dose-response
curves of UK-14,304 before and after benextramine treatment, as in Fig.
2. At 1 and 10 µM concentrations of benextramine, the
KA(app.) values were almost identical
with the Ki values [see
KA(app.)/Ki
ratios in Table 1]. This would suggest a linear correlation between
stimulus and response at concentrations of UK-14,304 yielding a
submaximal response. Also, when the relative
Smax values were calculated from the
fraction of receptors functional after alkylation (q) by 1 µM benextramine, it correlated very well with the relative Smax values calculated from 1×
Ki concentrations for both the Gs- and Gi-mediated
responses. These results suggest that responses at 1×
Ki concentrations can be used to
estimate half-maximal stimulus (and therefore R.e.) in these
cell lines. It should be noted that Furchgott analysis of dose-response
curves of UK-14,304 before and after treatment with 100 µM
benextramine gave KA(app.) values higher than Ki concentrations and the
estimated relative Smax values
differed greatly from those calculated from responses at a 1×
Ki concentration of UK-14,304.
Increasing concentrations of benextramine treatment not only decreased
the Emax but also shifted the curves
to the right beyond the Ki value,
suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition at higher concentrations of
benextramine may not be purely due to irreversible competitive
antagonism. More reliable KA(app.)
values are therefore calculated with the lowest concentration of
benextramine (1 µM) where the least nonspecific effects are expected.
Although the responses for all full agonists at concentrations equal to
their Ki values were submaximal, the
responses were greater than 80% of the
Emax values, and theoretically one may expect the relationship between stimulus and response to become nonlinear when receptor reserve is present. This would mean that the
relative Smax values calculated from
1× Ki concentrations should be
regarded as estimates.
The R.e.s of full agonists (relative to UK-14,304) were then
calculated from Smax values equal to
twice the response obtained at 1× Ki
concentrations of the agonists. The R.e.s of the partial agonists were calculated from the Emax
values obtained at 20× Ki
concentrations of the agonists. The R.e.s are reported in
Table 2. From the R.e.s it can be seen that ISO shows a
~9-fold higher efficacy for the Gs-mediated
stimulation of adenylyl cyclase compared with the
Gi-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase.
2A-AR Effector Site for Gs Coupling as
Activated by ISO May Be Similar to that for Classic
2A-AR Agonists.
Because ISO is not a classic
2A-AR agonist and was the only agonist to show
selectivity for activating the Gs pathway, the question arose of whether ISO induced an atypical G protein contact surface (or effector site) in the receptor for Gs
coupling. Wade et al. (1999)
recently showed that distinct
2A-AR regions are required for
Gi and Gs activation. Using
these mutant
2A-ARs that disrupt either
Gs coupling (
2A-R3) or
Gi coupling (
2A-B2), we
investigated whether these mutations to the
2A-AR would disrupt the coupling to
Gs and Gi in a similar
fashion when ISO was used as agonist.
2A-H
(±PTX),
2A-R3 (±PTX), and
2A-B2 (±PTX). It is important to note that to
permit comparison with mutant cell lines, the high expressing
2A-H line was needed for both
Gi and Gs responses.
Because of the high
2A-AR expression level in
2A-H, ISO behaves as a full agonist for the
Gi response versus the partial agonism seen in
the
2A-L cell line.
|
2A-R3 mutation.
Likewise, the Gi responses of UK-14,304 and ISO
were disrupted similarly by the
2A-B2
mutation. These data suggest that ISO activates a similar effector
region of the
2A-AR for
Gs coupling, as does the classic
2A-AR agonist UK-14,304. The effector region
of the
2A-AR for Gi
coupling also seems to be similar.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was undertaken to investigate agonist-directed
trafficking of porcine
2A-AR signaling through
the Gs- and Gi-coupled
signal transduction pathways.
ISO Selectively Activates Gs Pathway by Interaction
with
2A-ARs.
ISO was the only agonist tested to
show clear selectivity for Gs or
Gi at the
2A-AR.
Interestingly, ISO had a 9-fold higher R.e. at the
2A-AR for Gs versus
Gi, but it has low potency for both. It is clear
from the data with both Neo control cells and pharmacological
antagonists that this effect is mediated by the
2A-AR. These results support the hypothesis of
ADTRS (Kenakin, 1995
). We were not able to confirm the conclusion of
Eason and Liggett (1996)
that BHT-920 and BHT-933 lead to selective
activation of Gi. The difference between these
two conclusions is probably due to the fact that our analysis takes
into account spare receptors, whereas theirs did not. A further
difference is their use of human
2A-AR,
whereas we have porcine receptors, although this does not seem to be a
likely explanation. Other recently published reports of ADTRS include
the study of Berg et al. (1998)
in which 5-HT receptors couple to
phospholipases C and A2 with efficacies dependent
on the specific agonist; Bonhaus et al. (1998)
found differential
Gi and Gs coupling with
cannabinoid (CB1) agonists, and Yang and Lanier
(1999)
found differential coupling of rat
2A-ARs to Go and
Gi in NIH 3T3 cells.
-AR agonist that activates
Gs through
2-ARs also
appears to produce a Gs-selective conformation of
the
2A-AR, which typically activates
Gi. We could not, however, demonstrate
significant Gi- or
Gs-mediated responses with other
2-AR agonists such as salbutamol or
l-norephedrine because their affinities were too low (data
not shown).
As a first step to understanding the possible conformational
differences, we tested two recently described mutant
2-ARs that selectively alter
Gi and Gs coupling.
However, the Gs response in
2A-R3 and the Gi
response in
2A-B2 were inhibited similarly for
UK-14,304 and ISO (see Fig. 7). We propose that the
2A-AR effector sites for
Gs and Gi coupling when the
2A-AR is activated by ISO may be similar to
those exposed when the
2A-AR binds other
2A-AR agonists.
Oxymetazoline Activates Gi Pathway by Interaction with
Non-
2A-ARs.
Enhanced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase
by oxymetazoline in CHO-K1 cells as previously reported by Kenakin
(1995)
, appears to be mediated via an endogenous 5-HT receptor (Figs. 4
and 6). Schoeffter and Hoyer (1991)
estimated the affinity of
oxymetazoline at 5-HT1B (rat cortex) receptors as
a KD value of 26 nM. They also
reported that stimulation of 5-HT1A,
5-HT1B, and 5-HT1D
receptors inhibited adenylyl cyclase, whereas activation of
5-HT1C receptors stimulated adenylyl cyclase
activity. Because CHO cells have an endogenous
5-HT1B receptor (Berg et al., 1994
; Giles et al.,
1996
), that is the likely source of the excess Gi
response to oxymetazoline.
)-cyanopindolol for the receptor mediating this effect. This
result strongly emphasizes the importance of nontransfected control
cells when studying the pharmacological properties of cloned receptors.
Rank Order of Relative Efficacies for Gs and
Gi Is Generally Similar.
With the exception of ISO,
all agonists showed very similar R.e.s at the
2A-AR for the Gs and
Gi pathways. There may be modest differences in
R.e.s, such as BHT-920 for the Gi and
Gs pathways (0.27 ± 0.02 and 0.19 ± 0.02, respectively), but this study did not have sufficient statistical
power to define such a small difference. The rank order of
R.e.s at the
2A-AR for activation
of Gs and Gi pathways are
as follows.
BHT-920
BHT-933 > clonidine = p-iodoclonidine
xylazine
guanabenz.
For the Gi pathway (rank order of
R.e.s of p-iodoclonidine and oxymetazoline was
not determined because of significant responses in control Neo cells),
the order is l-epinephrine = l-norepinephrine = UK-14,304 > p-aminoclonidine
BHT-920 > BHT-933 = xylazine
clonidine
ISO
guanabenz.
The rank order of the R.e.s differs slightly from that found
by Wise et al. (1997)
-methylnoradrenaline > UK-14,304 > BHT-933
xylazine = clonidine]. However,
their data were obtained in COS-7 cells transiently transfected to
express the
2A-AR/Gi1
fusion protein, measuring GTPase activity as a readout of receptor
activation. In CHO cells,
G
i2 and G
i3 have been shown to
mediate inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by the
2A-AR (Gerhardt and Neubig, 1991
(i.e.,
Gi1 versus Gi2 and
Gi3) may contribute to the differences seen in
the R.e. of UK-14,304 and the catecholamines.
Defining
2A-H and
2A-L
Pharmacologically.
The 120-fold difference in the
EC50 value of the dose response curves of
UK-14,304 for the Gi pathway in
2A-H (
PTX) versus the
Gs pathway in
2A-H
(+PTX) suggests that the
2A-AR couples much
more efficiently to the Gi protein than to the
Gs protein. This preferential coupling of the
2A-AR to Gi is in
agreement with data from Eason et al. (1992
, 1994
) and Chabre et al.
(1994)
. However, in HEK 293 cells transfected to transiently coexpress the porcine
2A-AR with either
Gs, Gi, or
Gq, Chabre et al. (1994)
found that the
2A-AR couples ~1000 times more efficiently
to Gi (endogenous to HEK 293) than to either
Gs (rat
G
s) or Gq (murine
G
q). The reason for the
difference in the Gi/Gs selectivity of the
2A-AR coupling as suggested
by the data of Chabre et al. versus our data (1000 versus 120) is not
known. It is possible that coupling to endogenous G proteins is more efficient than to transfected G proteins.
2A-L
(+PTX), so the Gs response does not functionally antagonize the measured Gi response in
2A-L (
PTX). Also, contrary to what is seen
in
2A-H (
PTX) at supramaximal concentrations of UK-14,304, no Gs-mediated stimulation of
adenylyl cyclase is seen in
2A-L (
PTX). This
is important because Gs was not inactivated by
cholera toxin when the Gi responses were measured
in
2A-L (
PTX).
Because the large
Ki/EC50 ratio of
UK-14,304 for the Gi pathway in
2A-H (
PTX) suggests a large receptor
reserve, this was investigated by irreversible inhibition of the
2A-ARs by benextramine. Benextramine has been
shown to irreversibly block
-ARs (Melchiorre, 1981
2A-H (
PTX) by more
than 2 logs to the right but is insufficient to reduce the
Emax, it can be concluded that
UK-14,304 has a large receptor reserve for the Gi
response in this cell line. In both
2A-H
(+PTX) and
2A-L (
PTX), 1 µM benextramine
(20 min) is sufficient to decrease the
Emax, suggesting that UK-14,304 has a
much smaller receptor reserve for both the Gs and
Gi responses, respectively, in these two cell lines.
Conclusions.
We provide additional support for the ADTRS
hypothesis in a pharmacologically well-defined system. High
2A-AR expression (higher than found in most
mammalian tissue) is necessary for significant Gs
coupling, which may limit the relevance of these findings for normal
physiological conditions. However, the implications of this important
hypothesis for drug design are highly significant. To fully understand
the molecular mechanisms of ADTRS, it will be important to extend these
results to purified systems with direct measurements of G protein activation.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. Lee Limbird (Vanderbilt University) for providing
the porcine
2A-AR cDNA. William Lim and
Masakatsu Nanamori helped with some preliminary experiments related to
this study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication April 19, 2000.
Received for publication December 2, 1999.
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL46417 and funds from Eli Lilly (Indianapolis, IN). The development of the R3 and B2 mutants was also supported by the University of Michigan Multipurpose Arthritis Center (AR20557).
2 Present address: Division of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom, 2520 South Africa.
Send reprint requests to: Richard R. Neubig, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology, 1301 MSRB III, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0632. E-mail: RNeubig{at}umich.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ADTRS, agonist-directed trafficking of receptor
signaling;
AR, adrenergic receptor;
2A-H, high
2A-adrenergic receptor expressing Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cell line;
2A-L, low
2A-adrenergic receptor expressing Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cell line;
2A-B2, B2 mutant
2A-adrenergic receptor expressing Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cell line;
2A-R3, R3 mutant
2A-adrenergic receptor expressing Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cell line;
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary;
ISO, l-isoproterenol;
KA(app.), apparent dissociation constant of
the agonist-receptor complex;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
TCA, trichloroacetic acid;
DMEM, Dulbecco's mod