![]() |
|
|
Vol. 291, Issue 2, 671-679, November 1999
-Adrenoceptors in Canine Mesenteric Artery Are Predominantly
1A Subtype: Pharmacological and Immunochemical Evidence1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (E.E.D., Y.F.W., A.M.L., H.L.-C., C.-Y.K.); Smooth Muscle Research Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (E.E.D., R.D.B., Y.F.W., A.M.L., H.L.-C., C.-Y.K.); and Research Service, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois (R.D.B.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We wanted to determine which
-adrenoceptor
subtypes mediate phenylephrine (PE) contraction of dog mesenteric
artery in vitro. We studied antagonisms in response to prazosin,
2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl)-aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane, 5-methylurapidil, N-[2-(2-cyclopropyl methoxy
phenoxy)ethyl]5-chloro-
,
-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethanamine HCl (RS 17053),
8-3-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]propylcarbamoyl)-3-methyl-4-oxo-22-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran 2HCl [SB216469 (Rec 15/2739)], BMY 7378, 8-[2-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)ethyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione HCl, MDL 72832, and
7-chloro-2-bromo-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-4-methylfurol[4,3,2-ef]3-benzapine. pKB values for prazosin,
5-methylurapidil, MDL 72832, and RS-17053 were consistent with action
on
1A-adrenoceptors but decreased with concentration.
pKB values (9.6) for Rec 15/2739
(
1L/1A-adrenoceptor selective) were constant. Antagonism
by BMY 7378, 7-chloro-2-bromo-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-4-methylfurol[4,3,2-ef]3-benzapine, and
8-[2-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)ethyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione HCl gave pKB values between those expected
for
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptors. Chloroethylclonidine (100 µM) shifted EC50 values for PE
rightward and decreased Emax values but left
large residual responses. After 100 µM chloroethylclonidine, either
BMY 7378 (100 nM) or RS-17053 (300 nM) increased EC50
values for PE contractions with pKB values like those of controls. At 6 nM, phenoxybenzamine increased the EC50 values and reduced Emax
values; prior Rec 15/2739, but not prior BMY 7378, protected receptors
against inactivation. An antibody against the
1B-adrenoceptors immunostained muscle of aorta but not
mesenteric artery. We conclude that dog mesenteric artery contains
1A-adrenoceptors. Discrepancies among responses expected if only these receptors are present may result from pleiotropic functional effects at this receptor and the presence of
1L-adrenoceptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Shi
et al. (1989a
,b
, 1990
) showed that receptors of dog mesenteric and
saphenous veins (DMVs and DSVs, respectively) had similar KD (dissociation constant in saturation
ligand binding studies) values for and densities of
[3H]prazosin (PR) binding sites. However, in
dog mesenteric arteries (DMAs), the KD
value for prazosin binding was lower at a similar receptor density.
Only DMVs and DSVs, which had higher densities of
[3H]rauwolscine binding sites than DMAs,
responded by contraction to
2-adrenoceptor
agonists. All three vessels responded to phenylephrine (PE) with
similar pD2 values and similar efficacies.
Responses to norepinephrine were effected only through
1-adrenoceptors in DMAs, but
2-adrenoceptor activation also contributed to
the norepinephrine-induced contraction of DMVs and DSVs. Later,
Shimamoto et al. (1992)
showed that responses of DMAs to UK 14304, an
2-adrenoceptor-selective agonist, were
promoted by agents that produced threshold contractile stimulation by
enhanced Ca2+ entry, but
1-adrenoceptors as well as
2-adrenoceptors mediated these responses.
However, the question of which of the various subtypes of
1-adrenoceptors mediate contraction in DMAs
remains unanswered. After the subclassification of
1-adrenoceptors into
1A and
1B subtypes
based on greater sensitivity of the latter to inactivation by
chloroethylclonidine (CEC; Han et al., 1987a
,b
), molecular biological
studies have defined three subtypes, now known as
1A,
1B,
and
1D, all with high affinity for prazosin (Lomasney et al.,
1991a
,b
). The
1B-adrenoceptor defined
pharmacologically proved to be similar to the cloned
1b-adrenoreceptor, with a lower affinity for
2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl)-aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane (WB 4101) and 5-methylurapidil (5-MU) than the
1A-adrenoreceptor, which had high affinity for
these antagonists, as reviewed by Ford et al. (1994)
.
The
1D-adrenoceptor is now recognized to be a
distinct subtype (Schwinn and Lomasney, 1992
; Perez et al., 1994
;
see reviews in Ford et al., 1994
; Hieble et al., 1995a
),
distinguished from the
1A-adrenoceptor by a
low affinity for 5-MU and a high affinity for recently described
agents such as BMY 7378, 8-[2-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)ethyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione HCl (MDL 73005EF; Saussy et al., 1994
; Goetz et al., 1995
), and 7-chloro-2-bromo-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-4-methylfurol[4,3,2-ef]3-benzapine (SK&F 105854; Hieble et al., 1995b
) in cloned and expressed rat and
human receptors.
All these subclasses of receptors have high binding affinity
(pKi > 9) for prazosin when expressed in
cell lines. Naturally occurring receptors have been found to have lower
affinities (pKB or
pKi < 9) in some tissues (Muramatsu et
al., 1990
; Ohmura et al., 1992
) and have been classified as
1L-adrenoceptors in contrast to the
high-affinity types,
1H-adrenoceptors.
Receptors with low affinity for prazosin have not been cloned, but some
antagonists [e.g., SB216469;
8-3-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]propylcarbamoyl)-3-methyl-4-oxo-22-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran 2HCl (Rec 15/2739)] with high affinity for
1A-adrenoceptors have been reported to
distinguish between them and other
1- (perhaps
1L-) adrenoceptor subtypes (Testa et al.,
1996
, 1997
; Leonardi et al., 1997
). Recently, Ford et al. (1997)
showed
that the
1A-adrenoceptor expressed in CHO-K1
cells demonstrated binding properties [high affinity to prazosin,
5-MU, N-[2-(2-cyclopropyl methoxy
phenoxy)ethyl]5-chloro-
,
-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethanamine HCl (RS-17053), Rec 15/2739, WB 4101, and (+)-niguldipine] expected of
1A-adrenoceptors. However, when a functional
property, inhibition of production of inositol phosphates, was
evaluated, many antagonists gave lower affinity interactions, as
expected for
1L-adrenoceptors. Rec
15/2739 showed the same functional as binding affinity for the
1A-adrenoceptor. The authors suggested that
the
1L-adrenoceptor was a pleiotropic
expression of this receptor.
The goal of this study was to characterize the
1-adrenoceptor subtypes of DMAs by using
functional interactions as well as immunostaining studies. The results
can be compared with those from other canine blood vessels that have
different
-adrenoceptors (Daniel et al., 1996
, 1997
; Low et al.,
1998
).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal and Tissue Preparation. Mongrel dogs of either sex, weighing 10 to 25 kg, were kept under standard conditions in our animal quarters, fasted 24 h before use, and euthanized with an i.v. overdose (100 mg/kg) of pentobarbital. These procedures were approved by the University Animal Care Committee following the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Segments to be used for functional studies were placed in Krebs-Ringer solution (see below for composition).
Functional Studies. Rings of DMAs from the first or, occasionally, the second branch (3 mm wide) were mounted individually in 10-ml organ baths filled with modified Krebs' solution composed of 115.5 mM NaC1, 4.6 mM KC1, 1.16 mM MgSO4, 1.16 mM NaH2PO4, 2.5 mM CaC12, 21.9 mM NaHCO3, and 11.1 mM glucose, pH 7.4; gassed with a 95% O2/5% CO2 gas mixture; and kept at 37°C. The endothelium was removed by rubbing with forceps, confirmed by showing that carbachol could not relax a contraction induced by PE (3 µM) or 60 mM KCl. The tissues were subjected to a 3g preload tension, which gave the maximum contractile response, and allowed to equilibrate for 2 h. Rings were subjected to repeated exposures to 100 mM KCl, followed by washing, until contractions were regular. Cumulative dose-response curves were constructed before and 30 min after incubation with increasing concentrations of antagonists (except prazosin incubated for 45 min) were added. The concentration of agonist in the bath was increased approximately 3-fold at each step after the response to the previous dose had plateaued. Data were discarded if a 2-fold shift or more in the EC50 value for PE occurred in concomitant time controls.
When CEC was used as an antagonist, it was not feasible to carry out successive exposures to different PE concentrations. In these studies, of eight arterial rings, two were time controls, and two each were exposed to different concentrations of CEC. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. Phenoxybenzamine (PBZ) at 6 nM for 30 min. was used as an irreversible antagonist in receptor-protection experiments. One or two untreated strips served as a time control, two strips served as antagonist controls (treated with the same concentration of antagonist as used for receptor protection), two served as PBZ controls (only PBZ added), and two served as assays for receptor protection (the antagonist added 15 min before, and during, PBZ). PE concentration-effect (C-E) curves were run initially and again with antagonist or after washout of PBZ alone or with the antagonist. Some additional studies were carried out with rings of canine aortae to compare the sensitivity to PBZ of a tissue with mainly
1B-adrenoceptors to the sensitivity of DMAs.
In these studies, the handling of PBZ was similar to that above, but
because of the difficulty in washing out PE contractile responses in
this tissue, only one C-E curve was executed on each tissue, and the effects of PBZ were determined by comparing control C-E curves without
PBZ with those after various concentrations of PBZ. Data about PBZ
sensitivity from a recent study (Low et al., 1998b
1D-adrenoceptors, were also compared with those from DMAs.
Data Analysis for Functional Studies.
Data were expressed in
terms of the initial responses to 100 mM KCl as 100%. In all
experiments, time controls were run, and corrections were made to C-E
curves if needed. EC50 values were estimated by fitting
each concentration-response curve (logistic function) using MicroCal
Origin Software (Northampton, MA). Changes in dose ratios from
EC50 values with antagonist concentration were evaluated
using ANOVA. In some experiments after CEC pretreatment, subsequent
exposure to other antagonists resulted in C-E curves that at very high
PE concentrations began to show increased responses after a flex point
at the expected plateau level. We used the response level that
corresponded to the EC50 response before the antagonist
exposure to determine the new EC50 value.
KB (calculated antagonist dissociation
constant in functional studies) values (expressed and analyzed as
pKB) were calculated for antagonist effects
at each antagonist concentration (Furchgott, 1972
). When KB values increase
(pKB values decrease) significantly with
antagonist concentration, Schild plots have slopes of less than 1. We
used pKB values to emphasize the occurrence
or nonoccurrence of decreases with antagonist concentration and
presented mean values of dose ratios, the dependent variable
determining KB values. In these studies,
each n value refers to the mean value in a study of two or more arterial rings from a single animal. For data presentation in
the tables, pKB values were expressed as
mean ± S.E.
CEC Pretreatment. CEC pretreatment of de-endothelized arterial rings involved exposure for 30 min to several concentrations of CEC (0.3-100 µM) at 37°C, followed by washing for several exchanges of bath fluid. Then, C-E curves to PE were constructed. Finally, the shifts on C-E curves of endothelium-free arterial rings to BMY 7378 or to RS-17053 before and, in other rings, after exposure to 100 µM CEC for 30 min were determined.
Immunocytochemical Studies.
Four healthy dogs of either sex
were euthanized, and blood vessels were collected from aorta and
mesenteric arteries as described above. Blood vessels were opened,
rinsed free of blood, pinned out on Sylgard silicon rubber-coated
dishes, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde with 0.1 M phosphate
buffer, pH 7.4. The tissues to be used for cryostat sectioning were cut
into small pieces and then stored in 15% sucrose containing PBS for
cryoprotection at 4°C for 24 h and sectioned into 15-µM-thick
slices in a cryostat (Leitz 1720 digital, Wetzlar, Germany). The
sections were collected on the slides coated with gelatin. Cryostat
sections were incubated overnight at 4°C in 1:300 dilutions of rabbit
anti-sera raised against residues 506 to 515 at the carboxyl terminus
of the hamster
1B-adrenoceptor, which had been coupled
to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Fonseca et al., 1995
). The antibody was
visualized with CY3-labeled goat anti-rabbit goat anti-mouse antibodies
(Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Specificity of staining was
determined using preimmune serum and by saturation of the antibody with
the peptide epitope during exposure of cryostat sections against which
it was raised at 5 µg/ml. After washing with PBS, the sections were mounted in 80% glycerol in PBS (pH 10) and viewed on a Leitz
microscope equipped with fluorescence epiluminator and I2
filter. Kodak T-MAX 400 film was used for black-and-white photography.
Drugs and Chemicals. BMY 7378 was purchased from Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA). RS-17053, MDL 73005EF, and 8-[4-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)butyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione HCl (MDL 72832) were purchased from Tocris Cookson Chemicals (Bristol, UK). Prazosin was a gift from Pfizer Canada Inc. (Kirkland, Quebec, Canada). SK&F 105854 was a gift from Dr. J. P. Hieble (SmithKline Beecham, King of Prussia, PA). Rec 15/2739 was a gift from Dr. A. Leonardi (Recordati, S.p.a., Milan, Italy). Other chemicals, all of analytical grade, were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) or Research Biochemicals Inc. except for Tris, which was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Co. (Indianapolis, IN), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; BDH Inc., Toronto, Canada). Drug solutions were prepared in deionized water or DMSO (for prazosin, RS-17053, Rec 15/2739, and 5-MU). In all cases, the final DMSO concentration was no more than 0.1%, and time controls received the diluent solutions.
Statistical Analysis. Unpaired or paired (as appropriate) Student's t tests were used, and significance of difference was accepted at P < .05. Changes in antagonist pKB values with concentration were calculated and subjected to ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction (Version 5; GraphPAD, San Diego, CA).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional Studies
Effects of Selective
1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists:
Nonselective or
1D-Selective.
PE was used as a
1-adrenoceptor agonist; it is poorly selective among
subtypes of this receptor and is not a substrate for reuptake up by
sympathetic nerves. The EC50 values varied only slightly in
different experimental series [e.g., 2.6 ± 0.6 × 10
6 M (n = 7) versus
1.2 ± 0.2 × 10
6 (n = 7)].
1-adrenoceptor
antagonists: prazosin, WB 4101, 5-MU, RS-17053, Rec 15/2739, BMY 7378, MDL 73005EF, MDL 72832, and SK&F 105854. Prazosin had a
pKB value that decreased with
concentration, whereas that for WB 4101 did not (Table 1). At 3 nM, the
pKB for prazosin was 9.58, but at 30 and
300 nM, the values decreased significantly to 8.17 and 7.37, respectively. Indeed, there was no further increase in the dose ratio
at prazosin concentrations higher than 3 nM; dose ratios for time
controls and 3, 30, and 300 nM prazosin were 1.22 ± 0.19, 21.98 ± 11.7, 19.35 ± 9.68, and 19.05 ± 7.45, respectively. These values suggest that prazosin interacted with
high-affinity receptors such as
1A-adrenoceptors but that much lower-affinity interactions occurred at higher PE or prazosin concentrations.
|
|
1D- and
1A-adrenoceptors, but not
1B-adrenoceptors, have a high affinity for WB
4101. To evaluate whether
1D-adrenoceptors mediated PE-induced contractions, BMY 7378 and SK&F 105854 were tested
(Table 1). pKB values for BMY 7378 were
7.34, 7.29, and 7.06 when increasing concentrations of
10
7, 3 × 10
7, or
10
6 M were used. These
values were not significantly different. Even at
10
5 M, the
pKB value was similar: 6.69. Goetz et al.
(1995)
1A of 6.1 to 6.5 and for
1D of 8.2. With SK&F 105854, our
pKB values were 7.14, 6.87, 7.12, and 6.72 when concentrations of 10
7, 3 × 10
7, 10
6, or 3 × 10
6 M were used. Hieble
et al. (1995)
1A-adrenoceptors
(
1c-adrenoceptors at that time) of 6.5 and for
the
1D-adrenoceptors of 8.1.
MDL 73005EF, which, like BMY 7378, is
1D
selective (Saussy et al., 1996
1D-adrenoceptor subtypes as 7.31 and 8.16, respectively, for MDL 73005EF and values for the
1A subtypes of rat
and humans of 5.75 and 6.2, respectively. These data did not support
the possibility that the
1D-adrenoceptor mediated PE-induced contractions of DMAs.
1A-Adrenoceptor Selective Antagonists.
5-MU was
a potent antagonist (Table 2), with a pKB
value of 9.12 at 3 nM. Values of pKB
decreased slightly but significantly to 8.64 at both the concentrations
of 30 and 300 nM. The dose ratios increased significantly from
5.23 ± 0.81 at 3 nM to 14.84 ± 2.41 and 176.48 ± 81.31 at 30 and 300 nM, respectively. All of these
pKB values were within the range expected
for
1A-adrenoceptors (Hieble et al., 1995
). Because we
found no precedent in the published literature for changes in
pKB values with increasing 5-MU
concentrations, we repeated these studies 3 years later and obtained
similar results (Table 2 and Fig. 1). The
dose ratios were also similar (no significant differences from the
previous study), increasing from 4.57 ± 0.60 at 3 nM to
13.82 ± 2.41 and 74.67 ± 26.22 at 30 and 300 nM,
respectively.
|
|
1A selective (Saussy et al., 1996
1A-adrenoceptors (i.e., 8.58 and 8.41, respectively, and somewhat more than the
pKi values for the
1D-adrenoceptor of 7.42 and 8.11, respectively).
All these data suggested that at low agonist concentrations, the
1A-adrenoceptors in DMA mediated contractions.
RS-17053, 5-MU, and MDL 72832, all of which have higher affinity for
the
1A than for the
1D subtype, yielded
pKB values consistent with interaction at
that receptor subtype under these experimental conditions. However,
when higher concentrations of PE initiated contractions, another
1-adrenoceptor interaction of lower affinity with 5-MU, RS-17053, and MDL 72832, as well as prazosin, appeared to be
present. Because this receptor had as high affinity for WB 4101 as any
1A-adrenoceptor but low affinity for prazosin, it might be an
1L-adrenoceptor (Muramatsu,
1992
1L/A-Adrenoceptor Selective Antagonist.
Rec 15/2739, a compound highly selective for
1A-adrenoceptors and for the putative
1L-adrenoceptors (Testa et al., 1996
, 1997
; Leonardi et
al., 1997
), had pKB values of 9.63, 9.63, and 9.66 at 3, 10, and 30 nM (Fig. 3).
Thus, over a 10-fold antagonist concentration range and a concentration
ratio of ~200, this antagonist recognized a homogeneous group of
receptors (i.e., most receptors present, including
1A-adrenoceptors, had the same functional affinity for
this compound).
|
Effects of CEC.
The effects of increasing concentrations of
CEC on responses of DMAs to PE are summarized in Fig.
4. Note that the effects of CEC are small
until 10 µM was applied and that even after 100 µM, there were
large residual responses to PE. The vessels were pretreated with 100 µM CEC to reduce or eliminate any contribution from
1D- or
1B-adrenoceptors, and the
antagonism at residual receptors by RS-17053 (
1A selective) or BMY
7378 (
1D selective) was reexamined. If the CEC-sensitive
receptors were
1D-adrenoceptors, the
pKB values for BMY 7378 should be reduced to
those expected from its interaction with
1A-adrenoceptors, whereas those for RS-17053 should be
enhanced to those expected for
1A-adrenoceptors.
|
|
1D-adrenoceptors, leaving only
1A-adrenoceptors.
Effects of PBZ Inactivation of
1-Adrenoceptors on
Responses to Selective Antagonists
The effects of various concentrations of PBZ on responses to PE
are shown in Fig. 5. Note that 6 nM PBZ
for 30 min reduced Emax (maximum response
to PE) values by more than 60% and shifted the response curve
rightward by ~2 log units.
-Adrenoceptors on DMAs were much more
sensitive to PBZ inactivation than were those of DSV (Low et al.,
1998b
) or dog aorta. In DSVs, 100 nM PBZ was required to comparably
shift the PE concentration-response curve and reduce
Emax. In five experiments in dog aorta,
100, 1000, and 10,000 nM PBZ reduced the
Emax value to 78.9 ± 9.8, 49.9 ± 8.9, and 20.5 ± 7.1%, respectively, of control
Emax and shifted EC50
values from 4.1 ± 0.5 to 10.1 ± 2.6, 13.7 ± 4.1, and
69.2 ± 15.3 µM, respectively. Lower concentrations had no significant effects.
|
As shown in Fig. 6, BMY 7378 (300 nM),
and Rec 15/2739 (10 nM) were tested as to the effects of each alone and
with PBZ (receptor protection). BMY 7378 had no significant
antagonistic effect by itself after washout and failed to affect the
location of the concentration-response curve after PBZ. It did restore
the Emax level from ~40 to ~60% of
control. In contrast, Rec 15/2739 alone after washout shifted the
concentration-response curve ~6-fold (apparent
pKB = 8.7). Moreover, it restored the
concentration-response curve after PBZ to the value with Rec 15/2739
alone. In control experiments, we found that Rec 15/2739 alone did not
wash out over the experimental time period. We interpret these
experiments to suggest that BMY 7378 protects only a small subset of
1-adrenoceptors, responding to high
concentrations of PE, from PBZ inactivation, whereas Rec 15/2739
protects nearly all receptors.
|
Immunochemistry for
1B-Adrenoceptors in DMAs and
Aorta
Figure 7 shows the staining of aorta
as a positive control for recognition of
1B-adrenoceptors. Canine aorta appears to
contain predominantly
1B-adrenoceptors based
on functional and ligand binding studies (Hoo et al., 1994
; Leonardi et
al., 1997
; Low et al., 1998
). Aortic cells were stained in
particulate fashion (Fig. 6A), and the preimmune serum failed to stain
these cells (Fig. 6B). Saturation of the antibody with the peptide
epitope also abolished staining (Fig. 6C). In contrast, DMAs did not
stain with the antibody to
1B-adrenoceptors
(Fig. 6D).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we used several approaches to identify the
1-adrenoceptors that mediate PE-induced
contractions of DMAs in vitro. We quantified antagonisms by various
selective and nonselective antagonists: prazosin was expected to have
high and nonselective affinity at all subtypes of cloned receptors, WB
4101 had a higher affinity for
1A- and
1D-adrenoceptors; 5-MU, MDL 72832, RS-17053, and Rec 15/2739 had a higher affinity for
1A-adrenoceptors, but Rec 15/2739 possibly had
a special high affinity for
1L-adrenoceptors, presently defined only by their low affinity for prazosin (Hieble et
al., 1995a
; Testa et al., 1996
, 1997
; Leonardi et al., 1997
). BMY 7378, MDL 73005EF, and SK&F 105854 have higher affinity for
1D-adrenoceptors (Hieble et al., 1995a
; Saussy
et al., 1996
).
We used CEC, expecting it to inactivate
1B-adrenoceptors nearly completely and
1D-adrenoceptors mostly, whereas sparing most
1A-adrenoceptors. Thus, we expected
pretreatment with CEC to eliminate or reduce any effects of
1B- or
1D-adrenoceptors. However, it might inhibit
agonist action at
1A-adrenoceptors without
receptor inactivation (Michel et al., 1993
). In the human prostate,
which may contain
1L- or
1A-adrenoceptors, 50 µM CEC for 30 min had
little effect compared with vehicle control (Testa et al., 1996
).
We also used receptor protection by selective antagonists of PBZ
inactivation of
1A-adrenoceptors because we
have found that both
1B- and
1D-adrenoceptors are relatively resistant to
this agent (Low et al., 1998
, 1999
; current study).
Our initial main findings were that at low agonist concentrations, all
antagonists behaved as if they interacted with
1A-adrenoceptors, but some of them also
appeared to interact at higher antagonist concentrations with another
receptor, likely unidentifiable because of interference from the most
sensitive pathway.
This last receptor subtype was identified by Muramatsu et al. (1990)
after finding that
1-adrenoceptors included
those with a varied affinities for prazosin (
1H,
1L, and
1N,
in which
1H has a pKD value of
9 and
1L and
1N have a pKD value of
8 but
9). Muramatsu et al. (1990
, 1992
) and Ohmura et al. (1992)
reported that WB 4101 and 5-MU did not distinguish
1N- and
1L-adrenoceptors and that the
1A-,
1B-, and
1D-adrenoceptors were all members of the
1H-adrenoceptor class. Bevan et al. (1989)
reported that functional
1-adrenoceptors have
varied affinities for prazosin in different blood vessels. In our
study, receptors with both high and low affinity for prazosin seem to
function in DMAs. However, high-affinity receptors are not
1B-adrenoceptors.
Evidence Excluding Participation of
1B-Adrenoceptors
in Contraction of DMAs.
Piascik et al. (1997)
reported that the
1B-adrenoceptor and its mRNA were present and that the
receptors contributed to the contractile responses of rat mesenteric
arteries. Zhu et al. (1999)
reported that contractile responses of rat
mesenteric arteries were mediated primarily by
1A-adrenoceptors, suggesting that the situation is
similar to that in DMAs. Multiple evidence rules out
1B-adrenoceptors playing a major functional role in
canine DMAs. First, the high potency of WB 4101 to inhibit PE responses with subnanomolar KB values over the
concentration range of 3 to 300 nM is inconsistent with interactions
with
1B-adrenoceptors (Schwinn and Lomasney, 1992
).
Second, immunocytochemical studies with an antibody to
1B-adrenoceptors stained cells of canine aorta but not
DMA. Aorta appeared to contain predominantly
1B-adrenoceptors but not
1A-adrenoceptors
(Hoo et al., 1994
; Leonardi et al., 1997
; Low et al., 1998
) and
immunostained strongly with the antibody to that receptor, whereas the
DMA did not contain antigens that recognized this antibody. Third, in
DMAs, CEC was less potent than canine aorta, in which 10 µM CEC
reduced the maximum response to PE to 11% of the control value and 100 µM abolished all responses (Low et al., 1998
). At 10 µM, CEC
reduced the maximum response of DMA rings to 73% of control, and in
100 µM, the maximal response to PE was 53% of control and had not
reached a plateau. Fourth, PBZ was much more potent to inactivate
receptors in DMAs compared with canine aorta. We conclude that DMA has
few or no functional
1B-adrenoceptors and that the
persistent responses after CEC likely reflect effects on
1A-adrenoceptors (see below). In the absence of a tool
to selectively and irreversibly eliminate
1A-adrenoceptors, we could not characterize residual
adrenoceptors after CEC in DMAs.
Identification of
1-Adrenoceptor Subtypes in
DMAs.
Most of the prazosin interaction sites in DMAs had
pKD or pKB values
for prazosin and other antagonists near the values expected from
binding studies of cloned human and rat
1A-adrenoceptors (Hieble et al., 1995
). DMA had a KD value of
0.8 nM for prazosin receptors in earlier studies (Shi et al., 1989a
).
To evaluate functional receptors, we discounted
KB values derived from concentration ratios
of less than 2-fold more than for time controls as subject to large
errors (e.g., values for 3 and 30 nM MDL 73005EF and 0.3 or 3 nM
RS-17053). The remaining values for functional receptors also
corresponded to
1A-adrenoceptors in their high-affinity interactions with prazosin, WB 4101, MDL 72832, RS-17053, Rec 15/2739,
and 5-MU and their resistance to inactivation by CEC. However, at
higher agonist concentrations, lower-affinity interactions occurred
with prazosin and possibly with 5-MU but not with WB 4101 or Rec
15/2739.
1-adrenoceptors that had many pharmacological
characteristics of the
1A-adrenoceptor subtype
but had functional interactions that correlated best overall with the
putative
1L-adrenoceptor subtype, based on
results from studies of a series of quinazolinyl-amino derivative such
as Rec 15/2739.
Ford et al. (1997)
1A-adrenoceptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells
without native receptors demonstrated antagonist binding interactions
(pKi values) typical of 1A subtype (prazosin, 9.9; RS-17053, 9.3; WB 4101, 9.8; 5-MU, 9.2; and Rec 15/2739, 9.6). However, when the pKB values
for antagonists at these receptors were determined for inhibition of
[3H]inositol phosphates accumulation, the
values differed (prazosin, 8.7; RS-17053, 8.3; WB 4101, 8.8; 5-MU, 8.1;
and Rec 15/2739, 9.4) and resembled those at the
1L-adrenoceptor determined in human prostate.
Only Rec 15/2739 had a functional affinity comparable to its binding
affinity. In several respects, these data resemble ours in DMAs.
However, in the study by Ford et al., (1997)
1D-adrenoceptors in the responses of DMAs to
PE.
Possible Contributions of
1D- or
1L-Adrenoceptors to DMA Contractions.
If
1D-adrenoceptors are present in DMAs along with
1A-adrenoceptors, removing or minimizing their
contribution of non
1A-adrenoceptor with CEC should leave
classic
1A-adrenoceptors. As shown in Table 3,
elimination of CEC-sensitive receptors did not reduce the pKB value of BMY 7378 to levels expected for
1A-adrenoceptors, nor was there a major effect to
increase the pKB of higher concentrations of
RS-17053. Thus, the CEC-resistant and CEC-sensitive receptors behaved
similarly to antagonists that were selective for both the 1D and 1A
subtypes. The effects of CEC to shift C-E curves to PE for DMAs might
result from noncompetitive antagonism of the
1A-adrenoceptors rather than inactivation of
1-adrenoceptors. These results are inconsistent with a
model in which there are two functional receptors: the
1A-adrenoceptor and the
1D-adrenoceptor. A model in which all receptors recognize the same receptor population before and after CEC was suggested. Thus, either CEC has no selectivity for
1D-adrenoceptors over
1A-adrenoceptors in DMA, or the receptors are all the
same and the differences in pKB values at
higher concentrations of some antagonists result in nonclassic,
possibly pleiotropic behavior of the receptor. However, the presence of
another receptor, the
1L-adrenoceptor subtype, has not
been excluded by these data.
1D/B-adrenoceptors; see Daniel et al., 1996
1D nor
1B subtype. Thus, the concentration of PBZ used in
DMAs should have inactivated
1A-adrenoceptors but left
1D- and
1B-adrenoceptors intact or enriched because they are resistant to PBZ at that concentration. Consistent with the
fact that PBZ-sensitive receptors were not
1D subtype was the
limited ability of BMY 7378 to protect them against inactivation. In
contrast, Rec 15/2739 provided strong protection. Thus, these studies
and those with CEC speak against the presence of BMY 7378-sensitive
1D-adrenoceptors in DMA. The ability of Rec
15/2739 to protect against PBZ inactivation was consistent with its
functional antagonism at DMA receptors, antagonism that could involve
1A- or
1L-adrenoceptors.
Both
1A- and
1L-Adrenoceptors in
DMAs?
The occurrence of blood vessels with relatively low affinity
for prazosin at high concentrations of agonist but many pharmacological characteristics of the
1A subtype is not confined to canine blood vessels. Recently, van der Graaf et al. (1996)
reported a similar result for rat mesenteric arteries. They suggested that the
pharmacologically defined
1L subtype operated in that resistance
vessel. Testa et al. (1996)
suggested that human mesenteric artery
contained either exclusively
1A- or
1L-adrenoceptors. Lachnit et al. (1997) suggested that
rat caudal artery contained at least two subtypes of
1-adrenoceptors: mostly
1A-adrenoceptors
and another of lower affinity to RS-17053. If the findings of Ford et
al. (1997)
with recombinant
1A-adrenoceptors apply to
resistance blood vessels, it is possible that those in DMA have
1A-adrenoceptors in an environment in which their
functional behavior at high agonist levels corresponds to the
1L-adrenoceptors.
1-adrenoceptor subtype is present, we were
unable to unmask or characterize it, as noted above.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives.
The results of this study
suggest that the main functional adrenoceptor subtype in DMA are
1A-adrenoceptors and that DMA lacks functional
1B- or
1D-adrenoceptors. Low-affinity
interactions of these receptors may reflect the functional behavior of
the
1A-adrenoceptor at high agonist concentrations.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Angela Demeter and Tony Kwan for technical assistance in data analysis and graphic presentation.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication July 6, 1999.
Received for publication February 9, 1999.
1
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid and by a
Career Investigatorship Award (C.Y.K.) from the Ontario Heart and
Stroke Foundation and by a National Institutes of Health Grant GM41470 to R.D.B. This work was also aided by a Martin Wills student
scholarship (to A.D.) from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.
Portions were presented in abstract form (Kwan CY, Low AM, Lu-Chao H
and Daniel EE (1997) Characterization of
-adrenoceptor subtypes in dog mesenteric artery. Canadian Federation of Biological
Sciences, annual meeting, London, Ontario, Canada.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. E. E. Daniel, Room 4N51, Health Sciences Center, 1200 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail: daniele{at}fhs.csu.McMaster.Ca
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
DMV, dog mesenteric vein;
C-E, concentration-effect;
CEC, chloroethylclonidine;
DMA, dog mesenteric
artery;
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
DSV, dog saphenous vein;
Emax, maximum response to phenylephrine;
KB, calculated antagonist dissociation
constant in functional studies;
KD, dissociation constant in saturation ligand binding studies;
MDL 72832, 8-[4-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)butyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione
HCl;
MDL 73005EF, 8-[2-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)ethyl]8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione
HCl;
PE, phenylephrine;
PBZ, phenoxybenzamine;
Rec 15/2739, (SB216469;
8-3-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]propylcarbamoyl)-3-methyl-4-oxo-22-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran 2HCl, RS-17053, N-[2-(2-cyclopropyl methoxy
phenoxy)ethyl]5-chloro-
,
-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethanamine
HCl;
SK&F 105854, 7-chloro-2-bromo-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-4-methylfurol[4,3,2-ef]3-benzapine;
WB 4101, 2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl)-aminomethyl-1,4-benzodioxane;
5-MU, 5-methylurapidil.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenoceptor subtype in canine saphenous vein: Comparison to mesenteric vein.
Br J Pharmacol
117:
1535-1543[Medline].
-adrenoceptors in canine mesenteric vein.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
30:
591-598[Medline].
1-Adrenoceptor classification: Sharpening Occam's razor.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
15:
167-170[Medline].
1-adrenoceptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
272:
R5[Medline].
1-Adrenoceptor subtypes linked to different mechanisms for increasing intracellular Ca2+ in smooth muscle.
Nature (Lond)
329:
333-335[Medline].
1-adrenergic receptors revealed by chloroethylclonidine.
Mol Pharmacol
32:
505-510[Abstract].
1-adrenoceptors: Consensus update.
Pharmacol Rev
47:
267-270[Medline].
2-adrenoceptors.
Pharmacol Commun
6:
91-97.
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in canine aorta using alkylating agents.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
72:
97-103[Medline].
-adrenergic receptors: Implications for receptor classification and for structure-function relationships.
Biochem Biophys Acta
1095:
127-139[Medline].
1A-adrenergic receptor.
J Biol Chem
226:
6365-6369.
-adrenoceptor subtype in dog saphenous vein using phenoxybenzamine.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
288:
148-156
1-adrenoceptors in dog aorta.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
285:
894-901
1- and
2-adrenoceptor subtypes.
Mol Pharmacol
44:
1165-1170[Abstract].
1-adrenoceptors: Subclassification and functional aspects, in
-Adrenoceptors: Signal Transduction, Ionic Channels and Effector Organs (Fujiwara M, Sugimoto T and Kogure K eds) pp 193-202, Excerpta Medica, Toyko.
1-adrenoceptors in vascular smooth muscle.
Br J Pharmacol
99:
197-201[Medline].
1-adrenoceptor subtypes in the rat vas deferens: Binding and functional studies.
Br J Pharmacol
107:
697-704[Medline].
1C-adrenergic receptor provide evidence for its classification as the
1A subtype.
Mol Pharmacol
46:
823-831[Abstract].
1D adrenoceptors (adrenoceptors): Evidence that rat vascular
1 adrenoceptors are of the
1D subtype.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
72 (Suppl 1):
323.
1-adrenoceptor subtypes: Selective antagonists suggest the existence of a fourth subtype.
Eur J Pharmacol
227:
433-436[Medline].
-Adrenoceptors in dog mesenteric vessels: Subcellular distribution and number of 3H-prazosin and 3H-rauwolscine binding sites.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
15:
515-526[Medline].
1-adrenoceptor antagonists on noradrenaline-mediated contraction of rat small mesenteric artery.
Br J Pharmacol
118:
1308-1316[Medline].
1-adrenoceptor mediating vasoconstriction in perfused rat mesenteric vascular bed.
Acta Pharmacol Sinica
20:
151-156.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Hosoda, T.-a. Koshimizu, A. Tanoue, Y. Nasa, R. Oikawa, T. Tomabechi, S. Fukuda, H. Shinoura, S. Oshikawa, S. Takeo, et al. Two {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes Regulating the Vasopressor Response Have Differential Roles in Blood Pressure Regulation Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2005; 67(3): 912 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Guimaraes and D. Moura Vascular Adrenoceptors: An Update Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2001; 53(2): 319 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Filippi, A. Parenti, S. Donnini, H. J. Granger, A. Fazzini, and F. Ledda {alpha}1D-Adrenoceptors Cause Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation in the Rat Mesenteric Vascular Bed J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2001; 296(3): 869 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||