![]() |
|
|
Vol. 290, Issue 3, 1278-1284, September 1999
Analog with
Selective Antagonist Effects at the Prostaglandin
F2
(FP) Receptor
Molecular Pharmacology Unit (B.W.G., J.Y.C., N.A.S.) and Medicinal Chemistry Unit (P.K.), Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A novel analog of prostaglandin F2
[AL-8810; (5Z,
13E)-(9S,11S,15R)-9,15-dihydroxy-11-fluoro-15-(2-indanyl)-16,17,18,19,20-pentanor-5,13-prostadienoic acid] has been discovered with uniquely low efficacy
(Emax) at the endogenous prostaglandin
F2
receptors (FP receptors) of A7r5 rat thoracic aorta
smooth muscle cells and Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts, as assayed by
stimulation of phospholipase C activity. AL-8810 has weak agonist
potency (EC50) of 261 ± 44 nM (n = 3) and Emax = 19% (relative to the
full FP receptor agonist cloprostenol) in A7r5 cells and
EC50 of 186 ± 63 nM (n = 3) and Emax = 23% in 3T3 fibroblasts. AL-8810
exhibited properties of an apparent competitive antagonist, i.e.,
produced parallel dextral shifts of the agonist concentration-response
curves and no significant suppression of the maximal agonist-induced
response, when the potent, selective FP receptor agonist fluprostenol
was used. The inhibition parameters of AL-8810 were:
pA2 = 6.68 ± 0.23 and 6.34 ± 0.09 (n = 3-4) for A7r5 cells and 3T3 cells,
respectively, with Schild slopes ranging from 0.80 to 0.92. AL-8810
concentration-dependently antagonized the response to 100 nM
fluprostenol (Ki = 426 ± 63 nM;
n = 5) in A7r5 cells. However, even at 10 µM
concentration, AL-8810 did not significantly inhibit functional
responses of TP, DP, EP2, EP4, receptor
subtypes in various cell lines. AL-8810 also did not antagonize the
phospholipase C-coupled V1-vasopressin receptor in A7r5
cells. These results suggest that AL-8810 is a unique, selective
antagonist at the FP receptor, a heretofore unavailable pharmacological
tool that should be valuable for studying FP receptor-mediated
functional responses in complex biological systems.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
classification of prostanoid [prostaglandin (PG)] receptors
according to the binding affinities, potencies, and selectivities of
the five known classes of endogenous PGs (PGD2,
PGE2, PGF2a, PGI2, and thromboxane A2),
as first proposed by Coleman et al. (1990)
, has been validated in
numerous studies by using pharmacological methods and molecular
biological techniques (Coleman et al., 1994
; Narumiya, 1994
). All PG
receptors identified to date are seven-transmembrane proteins that
couple to specific G proteins mediating the formation of cAMP or
inositol trisphosphate/diacylglycerol second messengers (Coleman et
al., 1994
). Isoforms of some PG receptors, e.g., the EP, TP, and
prostaglandin PGF2
(FP) receptors, have been positively identified, although full characterization of the
pharmacological properties of all such isoforms generally has not yet
been accomplished (Coleman et al., 1994
; Narumiya, 1994
; Sugimoto et
al., 1994
; Pierce et al., 1997
). Potent, selective, synthetic
agonists of some PG receptors have defined the specific functional
responses coupled to activation of those receptors by use of cell lines expressing the respective cloned or endogenous PG receptors and also
isolated tissues (Coleman et al., 1994
). However, conclusive identification of the specific receptor(s) involved in PG-mediated functional responses of complex biological systems in vitro or in vivo
requires potent, selective receptor antagonists. To date, of the eight
known major PG receptor subtypes, experimentally useful antagonists,
e.g., possessing both the requisite potency and selectivity, have been
described only for the DP receptor (BW A868C) (Giles et al., 1989
) and
TP receptor (SQ-29,548) (Ogletree et al., 1985
), whereas less robust
antagonists with modest to poor selectivity have been characterized for
the EP1 receptor (SC51089 and AH6809, which is
also a weak antagonist at the EP2 and DP
receptors) and EP4 receptor (AH23848) (Coleman et
al., 1994
).
FP receptor agonists are potent, highly efficacious agents that reduce
elevated intraocular pressure in humans and certain animals (Wang et
al., 1990
; Bito, 1997
) and that have other pharmacological effects in
the mammalian body (Coleman et al., 1994
). The major FP receptor
isoform has high-sequence homology among many animal species
(Abramovitz et al., 1994
, 1995
; Lake et al., 1994
; Sakamoto et
al., 1994
); a second, minor FP receptor isoform with a truncated carboxyl terminus has been detected thus far only in a highly specialized cell type (large cell of mid-cycle corpus luteum) of sheep
(Pierce et al., 1997
). The structure, signaling properties, and
pharmacological profile of the single FP receptor in humans and several
species have been investigated. Agonist binding to the FP receptor
activates phospholipase C (PLC), producing elevated diacylglycerol and
inositol trisphosphate and a rapid increase in intracellular
Ca2+ as early-signaling events (Davis et al.,
1987
; Woodward et al., 1990
; Sakamoto et al., 1994
; Pierce et
al., 1997
; Griffin et al., 1997
, 1998
). Numerous such studies have
demonstrated considerable similarity of FP receptor function across
species, corroborating predictions based on the high interspecies
homology of the FP receptor gene. However, the tissue distribution of
the FP receptor in ocular as well as nonocular tissues varies greatly
among species (Bhattacherjee and Paterson, 1994
; Coleman et al.,
1994
; Lake et al., 1994
; Narumiya, 1994
; Abramovitz et al., 1995
;
Ocklind et al., 1997
; Mukhopadhyay et al., 1999
; Davis and Sharif,
1999
), raising important questions about its fundamental physiologic functions. Despite substantial efforts in this area, there is still no
well characterized FP receptor antagonist sufficiently potent and
selective to address these issues. A few structural analogs of
PGF2
, such as PGF2
dimethylamine and PGF2
dimethylamide (Stinger
et al., 1982
) and some nonprostanoid structures, i.e., phloretin
(Kitanaka et al., 1993
) and glibenclamide (Delaey and Van de Voorde,
1995
), have been reported to be FP receptor antagonists. However, the
potencies and selectivities of these compounds at the FP receptor
relative to other prostanoid receptors are not well characterized.
This report describes in vitro studies with AL-8810 [(5Z,
13E)-(9S,11S,15R)-9,15-dihydroxy-11-fluoro-15-(2-indanyl)-16,17,18,19,20-pentanor-5,13-prostadienoic acid] (Fig. 1), a novel, low-efficacy FP
receptor agonist with selective antagonistic activity at the FP
receptor. We reported recently the pharmacological properties of the FP
receptor of Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts (Griffin et al., 1997
) and A7r5
rat thoracic aorta vascular smooth muscle cells (Griffin et al., 1998
). The large amplification of FP receptor-coupled formation of inositol phosphates (IPs) by both cell types made this response the
pharmacological method of choice for characterizing the activities of
AL-8810 at the FP receptor in this study. These results suggest the
potential utility of AL-8810 as an FP receptor antagonist for
elucidating FP receptor involvement in PG-initiated responses of
complex biological systems containing heterogeneous PG receptor
populations.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture.
A7r5 rat vascular smooth muscle cells and
Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were maintained and cultured by standard
procedures, as described previously (Griffin et al., 1998
). The culture
medium was Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 4.5 g/liter glucose and 110 mg/liter sodium pyruvate, supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate, and 10%
fetal bovine serum. Other cells used in these studies included:
embryonic bovine tracheal (EbTr) cells (Ito et al., 1990
; Crider et
al., 1999
), transformed human nonpigmented ciliary epithelial (NPE)
cells (Jumblatt et al., 1994
; Crider et al., 1998a
), both grown in the above culture medium; Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells (Milne et
al., 1994
), grown in Ham's F-12 medium with other supplements as
listed above; and NCB-20 cells, cultured in the DMEM-based medium as
described above, containing also 2% hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and
thymidine (Blair et al., 1980
; Crider et al., 1998b
). Cells were
maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
and 95% air, with two changes of fresh medium weekly. All cells were
passaged at approximately 90% confluence by treatment with 0.05%
trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA.
Second Messenger Assays.
Previously published procedures
were used to measure [3H]inositol phosphates
([3H]IPs) produced by agonist-mediated
activation of PLC (Sharif et al., 1994
, 1998
; Griffin et al., 1997
,
1998
). In brief, cells grown to confluence in 24-well, uncoated plastic
plates were exposed for 24 to 30 h to 1.0 to 1.5 µCi
[3H]myo-inositol (18.3 Ci/mmol, as
supplied) in 0.5 ml of DMEM (serum-free, containing unlabeled
myo-inositol), corresponding to a specific activity of 37.5 µCi/mmol [3H]myo-inositol in the
labeling medium. Cells then were rinsed once with DMEM/F-12 containing
10 mM LiCl and incubated with agonist in the same medium for 1 h
at 37°C (triplicate determinations for each concentration).
Antagonist effects were determined by adding the antagonist (or the
solvent ethanol as a control) for 10-20 min (as described in the
figure legends) before the 1-h incubation with agonist. After
aspirating the medium, cells were lysed with 1 ml of cold (4°C) 0.1 M
formic acid. The chromatographic separation of radiolabeled components
on an AG-1-X8 column was performed exactly as described (Griffin et
al., 1997
, 1998
). The total [3H]IPs eluted with
4 ml of 1.2 M ammonium formate (containing 0.1 M formic acid) was mixed
with 15 ml of scintillation fluid and counted with a beta counter.
Detailed procedures for measurement of PG receptor-coupled cAMP
formation by an automated radioimmunoassay (RIA) procedure were
described recently (Crider et al., 1998b
). Confluent cells (grown in
48-well, uncoated plastic plates) were rinsed with DMEM/F-12 and then
incubated 20 min with 0.8 mM ascorbate, 1 mM
3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (phosphodiesterase inhibitor), and
antagonist, if present in the experiment, before adding the agonist.
The medium was aspirated at the end of the agonist stimulation period,
and the cells were lysed with 0.1 M acetic acid (4°C), followed by
neutralization with 0.1 M sodium acetate (4°C). The cAMP assay was
automated by utilizing a Biomek 1000 robot (Beckman Instruments,
Fullerton, CA) to dilute samples with RIA buffer into a 96-well
filtration plate (0.45-µm surfactant-free mixed cellulose).
125I-cAMP and primary cAMP antibody then were
added by the robot, which also mixed the samples thoroughly. After an
incubation at 4°C for 16 to 24 h, the secondary antibody was
added to the samples. After a 20-min incubation at room temperature,
bound and free 125I-cAMP were separated by vacuum
filtration, using a Millipore disposable punch-tip assembly and
manifold. The bound 125I-cAMP was quantitated by
use of a gamma counter and comparison to a standard curve of known cAMP
samples carried through the assay procedure.
Materials.
Cell lines were purchased from the American Type
Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), except for nonpigmented ciliary
epithelial (NPE) cells, generously provided by Dr. M. Coca-Prados, and
NCB-20 cells, a gift from Dr. M. W. Nirenberg. Life Technologies
(Grand Island, NY) supplied DMEM, DMEM/F-12, Ham's F-10, glutamine,
gentamicin, and trypsin/EDTA. Fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT)
was heat-inactivated at 56°C for 30 min and stored at
20°C.
Amersham (Deerfield, IL) provided
[3H]myo-inositol.
Arg8-vasopressin (AVP) and
[d(CH2)5,
Tyr(Me)2,
Tyr(NH2)9]-AVP were
purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont, CA). AG 1-X8
anion-exchange resin was a product of Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Ecolume
scintillation fluid was supplied by ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA).
The 125I-cAMP RIA kits were supplied by
PerSeptive Diagnostics (Cambridge, MA).
78°C
yielded the corresponding lactol, which was condensed with
Ph3P+(CH2)4CO2H
in the presence of potassium t-butoxide, followed by esterification of the resultant ene acid with isopropyl iodide, to
provide
(5Z)-(9S,11S)-13-(t-butyldiphenylsiloxy)-11-fluoro-9-hydroxy-14,15,16,17,18,19,20-heptanor-5-prostenoic acid isopropyl ester. Protection of the C-9 alcohol as the
tetrahydropyranyl ether, followed by desilylation of the C-13 alcohol
with tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride and oxidation using
oxalyl chloride/dimethyl sulfoxide/triethyl amine, yielded
(5Z)-(9S,11S)-11-fluoro-13-oxo-9-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy)-14,15,16,17,18,19,20-heptanor-5-prostenoic acid isopropyl ester. Horner-Emmons condensation of the aldehyde with
dimethyl 2-oxo-2-(2-indanyl)ethylphosphonate provided the carbon-9
tetrahydropyranyl ether carbon-15 ketone analog of AL-8810 as the
isopropyl ester. Reduction of the ketone to the alcohol as a mixture of
15R and 15S diastereomers was accomplished by using sodium borohydride/cerium trichloride in methanol. Conversion of
the carbon-9 tetrahydropyranyl group to a hydroxy group was achieved by
using HCl in isopropanol. At this point the two carbon-15 diastereomers
were separated chromatographically, and the desired 15R
diastereomer (the slower-eluting diastereomer on normal-phase silica
gel using 3:2 hexane/ ethyl acetate as eluant) was converted to AL-8810
by saponification with lithium hydroxide in methanol. The chemical
structure was verified by NMR and mass spectrometry, and the
diastereomer assignment at carbon-15 was made by comparison of
pharmacological activities and chromatographic properties with those of
standard diastereomer pairs with known configuration at the carbon-15
position. Other prostaglandins were purchased from Cayman Chemical Co.
(Ann Arbor, MI).
Data Analyses.
Concentration-response data were analyzed
using the sigmoidal-fit function of the Origin Scientific Graphics
software (Microcal Software, Northampton, MA) to determine agonist
potency (EC50 value) and efficacy, relative to a
standard full agonist. For the FP receptor, cloprostenol served as the
reference standard full agonist. Equilibrium inhibition constants were
calculated as Ki = IC50/[(1 + (agonist concentration/agonist
EC50)] (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
) when the
antagonistic effects of multiple concentrations of AL-8810 were
titrated against a fixed concentration (100 nM) of fluprostenol. The
apparent pKb values (
log antagonist
dissociation constant) were calculated as
Kb = (antagonist
concentration)/[(agonist EC50 in presence of
antagonist/agonist EC50 in absence of
antagonist)
1], according to Furchgott (1972)
. Antagonist
potency was represented as pA2 (
log drug
dissociation constant) and is defined as
log molar antagonist
concentration required to shift the agonist concentration-response curve to the right by 2-fold, as determined by Schild analysis (Arunlakshana and Schild, 1959
).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The concentration-response data shown in Fig.
2 demonstrate that AL-8810 is a weak
partial agonist with low efficacy at the FP receptor of A7r5 cells. The
mean potency of AL-8810 was EC50 = 261 ± 44 nM (n = 3) and Emax = 19% compared with cloprostenol (EC50 = 0.84 nM;
Emax = 100%) (Griffin et al., 1998
),
the standard full agonist employed routinely in these experiments. The
response to 100 nM fluprostenol, a highly selective full agonist at the FP receptor (Coleman et al., 1990
; Sharif et al., 1998
, 1999
), with
EC50 = 4.45 nM in this assay (Griffin et al.,
1998
), was inhibited by a short preincubation (10 min) of the cells
with increasing concentrations of AL-8810 (Fig.
3). The mean antagonist potency
(Ki) determined from the individual
experiments of Fig. 3 (based on Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
) was
426 ± 63 nM (n = 5), with
pKi = 6.39 ± 0.06. AL-8810
produced a concentration-dependent dextral shift in the fluprostenol
concentration-response curve, without significantly decreasing the
agonist-induced maximal response (Fig.
4), typical of a competitive antagonist.
Schild analyses of multiple experiments of the type in Fig. 4 (Fig.
5) determined a line with a slope of
0.80 ± 0.08 (different from 1.0), correlation coefficient of
0.96 ± 0.01, and mean pA2 value of
6.68 ± 0.23 (n = 4), corresponding to a mean
antagonist dissociation constant of 285 ± 97 nM
(n = 4). As evidence that the protein target of AL-8810
was the FP receptor, and not some other protein early in the signaling
pathway, AL-8810 was evaluated for possible antagonist activity at the
PLC-coupled V1-vasopressin receptor of A7r5
cells, using AVP as the agonist. As shown in Fig.
6, AL-8810 produced no measurable
inhibition of this response. In the positive control experiment (Fig.
6), the [3H]IPs' response to AVP was
completely inhibited by a known selective antagonist of this receptor,
[d(CH2)5,
Tyr(Me)2,
Tyr(NH2)9]-Arg8-vasopressin
(Thibonnier et al., 1991
). In identical experimental protocols (Griffin
et al., 1997
), the agonist potency and efficacy of AL-8810 at the FP
receptor of Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were determined to be 186 ± 63 nM (n = 3) and 23%, respectively (data not
shown). The pA2 value of AL-8810 with this cell
line (Schild slope = 0.92, equal to 1, p < .05)
was 6.39 ± 0.09, corresponding to an antagonist dissociation
constant of 474 nM (data not shown). We also have observed that AL-8810
inhibits, with similar antagonist potency, fluprostenol-stimulated
activation of PLC in HEK-293 cells expressing the cloned human ocular
FP receptor (unpublished observations).
|
|
|
|
|
A series of experiments was performed to determine the PG receptor
selectivity of AL-8810 by assessing its antagonist activity at other PG
receptors, which are known to be expressed endogenously in certain
established cell lines. In the concentration range of 1 nM to 100 µM,
only 100 µM AL-8810 produced any significant inhibition of TP
receptor-mediated activation of PLC in human NPE cells (Fig.
7). By comparison, this response was
completely inhibited by the potent, selective TP receptor antagonist
SQ-29,548, with IC50 = 0.61 µM (Fig. 7). The
NPE cell TP receptor is activated selectively by two known TP
receptor ligands, I-BOP (EC50 = 8.2 nM) and
U-46619 (EC50 = 1.23 µM) and has been
identified as the TP
isoform (unpublished
observations). As shown in Fig. 8, AL-8810 was evaluated for antagonist activity at several adenylyl cyclase-coupled PG receptors: after a short preincubation with increasing concentrations of AL-8810, each receptor was activated by
its respective endogenous ligand. In these experiments, AL-8810 produced no statistically significant inhibition of cAMP formation coupled to the following PG receptors: 1) EP2
receptor of human NPE cells (Jumblatt et al., 1994
; Crider et al.,
1998a
); 2) EP4 receptor on CHO cells (Milne et
al., 1994
); 3) DP receptor of EbTr cells (Ito et al., 1990
; Crider et
al., 1999
); and 4) IP receptor on NCB-20 cells (Blair et al., 1980
;
Crider et al., 1998b
). Data published by our laboratory have confirmed
the identity of these PG receptors, as follows: 1)
EP2 receptor, activated by the selective
EP2 receptor agonist butaprost
(EC50 = 212 nM) and other known ligands of the
EP2 receptor (Crider et al., 1998b
); 2)
EP4 receptor, not activated by butaprost but
inhibited by the EP4-selective antagonist
AH23848B (J.Y.C., B.W.G., and N.A.S., in preparation); 3) DP
receptor, high potencies of selective DP receptor ligands [ZK118182
(16 nM), RS-93520 (23 nM), BW245C (59 nM), and
PGD2 (100 nM)] and also potent inhibition of the
response to these agonists by the selective DP receptor antagonist
BWA868C (pA2 = 8.00) (Crider et al., 1999
); and
4) IP receptor, selective and potent activation by
PGI2 (3.5 nM), carbaprostcyclin (5.1 nM), and
iloprost (59 nM) (Crider et al., 1998b
).
|
|
We attempted without success to confirm reports (Stinger et al., 1982
)
that PGF2
dimethylamine and
PGF2
dimethylamide are antagonists at the A7r5
cell FP receptor. Only the amide analog displayed any measurable
activity that was agonistic in nature, producing (at 10 µM
concentration) a response <25% of the maximal fluprostenol-stimulated
IP response. Significantly, neither of these
PGF2
analogs had any demonstrable antagonistic
activity at the FP receptor of A7r5 cells or Swiss mouse 3T3
fibroblasts (data not shown). In preliminary experiments we also have
evaluated the antagonist activities of phloretin and glibenclamide at
the A7r5 cell FP receptor. The results showed convincingly that both compounds are less potent FP receptor antagonists than AL-8810: the
pKb value of phloretin is less than
5.5 and that of glibenclamide is less than 4.0 (unpublished data).
Based on these findings, AL-8810 appears to be the most potent FP
receptor antagonist of any compound that has been claimed in the
literature to have antagonistic activity at the FP receptor.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In these studies, we have identified AL-8810 as a unique partial
agonist with approximately 20% efficacy at the endogenous FP receptors
in cell lines of two different species, Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts and
A7r5 rat vascular smooth muscle cells. The FP receptor antagonist
activity suggested by these pharmacological properties was confirmed;
thus, AL-8810 was shown to be an antagonist of the PI turnover
signal-transduction mechanism coupled to FP receptors in both cell
types of our study. Moreover, AL-8810 exhibited no significant
antagonistic activity at several adenylyl cyclase-coupled PG receptors,
including the DP, EP2, EP4,
and IP receptors, using well characterized and pharmacologically
validated assays in our laboratory. For example, the DP receptor of
EbTr cells has been shown to be selectively activated by
PGD2 and by structurally similar
PGD2 analogs, and the cAMP response to these
ligands is antagonized by the selective DP receptor antagonist BWA 868C
(Crider et al., 1999
) with the expected high potency (Giles et al.,
1989
). Similarly, the EP4 receptor on CHO-K1
cells has been shown to be pharmacologically distinct from the well
characterized EP2 receptor on NPE cells (Jumblatt
et al., 1994
; Milne et al., 1994
; Crider et al., 1998b
), as established
by the use of the EP2-selective agonist butaprost
and the EP4-selective antagonist AH23848B
(unpublished observations). Moreover, stimulation of the PLC-coupled
V1-vasopressin receptor in A7r5 cells by AVP, a
response that was fully inhibited by the potent, selective AVP
antagonist [d(CH2)5,
Tyr(Me)2,
Tyr(NH2)9]-Arg8-vasopressin
(Thibonnier et al., 1991
), was unaffected by high concentrations of
AL-8810. Because AL-8810 is a PG-like lipophilic molecule, the small,
apparent inhibition of TP receptor function produced by the highest
concentration (100 µM) of AL-8810 may result from interactions of the
compound with lipid molecules in the cell membrane or with hydrophobic
regions of the TP receptor itself that indirectly perturb TP receptor
function. However, such generalized "antagonistic" effects observed
only at very high concentrations of lipophilic molecules are difficult
to characterize and classify. Collectively, these data suggest that
AL-8810 exerts a rather selective antagonistic function at the FP receptor.
The activities of AL-8810 as a weak partial agonist and an antagonist
at the FP receptor of Swiss mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were very similar to
its respective activities at the rat A7r5 cell FP receptor. The
antagonistic effects of AL-8810 at the FP receptor appeared to exhibit
features of competitive antagonism: for one cell type, the Schild slope
was not different from 1, and for both cell types, the antagonist
potency/dissociation constants computed by several methods were
generally in good agreement. The partial-agonist properties of AL-8810
and cell-specific characteristics, such as receptor density, etc., may
contribute, in part, to some differences between the two cell types.
The Schild plot slope also could be influenced by AL-8810 perturbation
of the cell membrane at high antagonist concentrations, in a manner
suggested above for the TP receptor. Studies to address these issues
are now in progress. The similar antagonistic properties of AL-8810 at
the FP receptors of two different species, along with the evidence for
FP receptor selectivity of AL-8810, support other published data
indicating very similar pharmacological and structural properties of
the FP receptors of these and other species (Abramovitz et al., 1994
;
Griffin et al., 1997
, 1998
; Sharif et al., 1998
). We also have
determined (unpublished data) that AL-8810 has similar antagonistic
potency (pA2 ~6.0) at the cloned human ocular FP receptor expressed by HEK-293 cells. These results on AL-8810 pharmacological activities at various FP receptors reinforce published data that indicate a high degree of interspecies homology of the FP
receptor. Moreover, these data suggest that AL-8810 may be a useful
experimental tool for investigating FP receptor-mediated functional
responses in complex biological systems of different species.
There are several reported FP receptor antagonists in the scientific
literature, including two PGF2
structural
analogs, PGF2
dimethylamine and
PGF2
dimethylamide (Stinger et al., 1982
), as
well as phloretin (Kitanaka et al., 1993
) and glibenclamide (Delaey and
Van de Voorde, 1995
), that are not prostanoids. In identical
experimental protocols conducted in parallel with the experiments with
AL-8810, we detected no antagonistic activity of
PGF2
dimethylamine or
PGF2
dimethylamide (unpublished observations).
We recently have performed similar experiments with phloretin and
glibenclamide and shown these compounds to be quite weak antagonists
not only at the FP receptor but also at several other PG receptors
(data not shown), confirming previous reports (Kitanaka et al., 1993
;
Delaey and Van de Voorde, 1995
). The data reported in this study were
obtained under carefully controlled and very similar experimental
conditions using well established functional assays for various PG
receptors. This approach allows a more valid comparison of the
activities of AL-8810 and other tested antagonists at each of the PG
receptors. As such, these results provide definitive evidence for the
FP receptor potency and selectivity of AL-8810, a compound with certain
structural features in common with PGF2
, the
endogenous FP receptor ligand. Additional studies are in progress to
demonstrate further the utility and advantages of AL-8810 over other
claimed FP receptor antagonists.
In summary, AL-8810, a novel structural analog of
PGF2
, is a partial agonist with low efficacy
and also a competitive antagonist at the endogenous FP receptors in two
cell lines derived from different species. The potency and selectivity
of AL-8810 at the FP receptor established by these studies suggest that
AL-8810 may be a valuable probe for elucidating specific FP
receptor-mediated functions in complex biological systems.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Valuable discussions and continued support of these and related studies by Dr. Tom Dean are gratefully acknowledged.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 12, 1999.
Received for publication March 4, 1999.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Najam A. Sharif, Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., R2-19, 6201 South Freeway, Fort Worth, TX 76134-2099. E-mail: naj.sharif{at}alconlabs.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PG, prostaglandin;
FP receptor, prostaglandin
PGF2
receptor;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium;
IP, inositol phosphate;
AVP, Arg8-vasopressin;
PI, phosphoinositide;
PLC, phospholipase C;
Emax, maximal response (%) relative to the
maximal response of a standard full agonist;
RIA, radioimmunoassay;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
EbTr, embryonic bovine tracheal;
NPE, nonpigmented ciliary epithelial.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
stimulates phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis and mobilizes intracellular Ca2+ in bovine luteal cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:
3728-3732
receptor in cultured rat astrocytes.
J Neurochem
60:
704-708[Medline].
receptors and the expression of the rat prostaglandin F2
receptor.
FEBS Lett
355:
317-325[Medline].
receptor.
J Biol Chem
269:
3881-3886
-(+)-fluprostenol). Carboxylic acid of travoprost (AL-6221), a novel FP prostaglandin to study the pharmacology and autoradiographic localization of the FP receptor.
J Pharm Pharmacol
51:
685-694[Medline].
binding to EP3, and FP prostaglandin receptor binding sites in bovine corpus luteum: Characterization and correlation with functional data.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
286:
1094-1102
, A2, and their esters in glaucomatous monkey eyes.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
31:
2466-2470[Abstract].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Riise, C. H.T. Nguyen, E. Qvigstad, D. L. Sandnes, J.-B. Osnes, T. Skomedal, F. O. Levy, and K. A. Krobert Prostanoid F receptors elicit an inotropic effect in rat left ventricle by enhancing myosin light chain phosphorylation Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2008; 80(3): 407 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hirao, K. Kondo, K. Takeuchi, N. Inui, K. Umemura, K. Ohashi, and H. Watanabe Cyclooxygenase-dependent vasoconstricting factor(s) in remodelled rat femoral arteries Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Seto, C. Hirota, S. Hirota, and L. J. Janssen E-Ring Isoprostanes Stimulate a Cl Conductance in Airway Epithelium via Prostaglandin E2-Selective Prostanoid Receptors Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 88 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Paredes, T. Tazzeo, and L. J. Janssen E-Ring Isoprostane Augments Cholinergic Neurotransmission in Bovine Trachealis via FP Prostanoid Receptors Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., December 1, 2007; 37(6): 739 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Meisdalen, O. F. Dajani, T. Christoffersen, and D. Sandnes Prostaglandins Enhance Epidermal Growth Factor-Induced DNA Synthesis in Hepatocytes by Stimulation of E Prostanoid 3 and F Prostanoid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2007; 322(3): 1044 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Matsumoto, M. Kakami, E. Noguchi, T. Kobayashi, and K. Kamata Imbalance between endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting factors in mesenteric arteries from aged OLETF rats, a model of Type 2 diabetes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1480 - H1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Romano and M. D. Lograno Evidence for the Involvement of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors in the Bimatoprost-Induced Contractions on the Human Isolated Ciliary Muscle Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3677 - 3682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Vysniauskiene, R. Allemann, J. Flammer, and I. O. Haefliger Vasoactive Responses of U46619, PGF2{alpha}, Latanoprost, and Travoprost in Isolated Porcine Ciliary Arteries Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 295 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Sales, T. List, S. C. Boddy, A. R.W. Williams, R. A. Anderson, Z. Naor, and H. N. Jabbour A Novel Angiogenic Role for Prostaglandin F2{alpha}-FP Receptor Interaction in Human Endometrial Adenocarcinomas Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7707 - 7716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. A. Harks, P. H. J. Peters, J. L. J. van Dongen, E. J. J. van Zoelen, and A. P. R. Theuvenet Autocrine production of prostaglandin F2{alpha} enhances phenotypic transformation of normal rat kidney fibroblasts Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): C130 - C137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Husain, F. Jafri, and C. E. Crosson Acute Effects of PGF2{alpha} on MMP-2 Secretion from Human Ciliary Muscle Cells: A PKC- and ERK-Dependent Process Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 1706 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Matias, J. Chen, L. De Petrocellis, T. Bisogno, A. Ligresti, F. Fezza, A.H.-P. Krauss, L. Shi, C. E. Protzman, C. Li, et al. Prostaglandin Ethanolamides (Prostamides): In Vitro Pharmacology and Metabolism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2004; 309(2): 745 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Horsley and G. K. Pavlath Prostaglandin F2{alpha} stimulates growth of skeletal muscle cells via an NFATC2-dependent pathway J. Cell Biol., April 14, 2003; 161(1): 111 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Sharif, C. R. Kelly, and J. Y. Crider Human Trabecular Meshwork Cell Responses Induced by Bimatoprost, Travoprost, Unoprostone, and other FP Prostaglandin Receptor Agonist Analogues Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 715 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Kelly, G. W. Williams, and N. A. Sharif Real-Time Intracellular Ca2+ Mobilization by Travoprost Acid, Bimatoprost, Unoprostone, and Other Analogs via Endogenous Mouse, Rat, and Cloned Human FP Prostaglandin Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2003; 304(1): 238 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Sharif, J. Y. Crider, S. X. Xu, and G. W. Williams Affinities, Selectivities, Potencies, and Intrinsic Activities of Natural and Synthetic Prostanoids Using Endogenous Receptors: Focus on DP Class Prostanoids J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2000; 293(2): 321 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||