![]() |
|
|
Vol. 290, Issue 1, 83-95, July 1999
Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Castres Cedex, France
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F 11356 (4-[4-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yloxyl]acetyl]piperazinyl-1-yl]benzonitrile) was designed to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) compared with tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors. F 11356 has subnanomolar affinity for cloned human and nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, and its affinity for 5-HT1A and other 5-HT receptors, including the 5-ht1F subtype, is 50-fold lower and micromolar, respectively. In C6 cells expressing human 5-HT1B or human 5-HT1D receptors, F 11356 was the most potent compound in inhibiting forskolin-induced cyclic AMP formation (pD2 = 8.9 and 9.6), and in contrast to tryptamine and derivatives, it produced maximal enhancement of [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate-specific binding equivalent to 5-HT. F 11356 was equipotent to 5-HT (pD2 = 7.1 versus 7.2) and more potent than tryptamine derivatives in contracting rabbit isolated saphenous vein. In isolated guinea pig trigeminal ganglion neurons, F 11356 was more potent (pD2 = 7.3 versus 6.7) and induced greater increases in outward hyperpolarizing Ca2+-dependent K+ current than sumatriptan. In anesthetized pigs, F 11356 elicited highly cranioselective, more potent (from 0.16 µg/kg i.v.) and greater carotid vasoconstriction than tryptamine derivatives. Decreases in carotid blood flow were observed in conscious dogs from 0.63 mg/kg oral F 11356 in the absence of changes in heart rate or behavior. Oral activity was confirmed when hypothermic responses were elicited in guinea pigs (ED50 = 1.6 mg/kg), suggesting that F 11356 also accesses the brain. F 11356 thus is a selective, high-potency agonist at 5-HT1B/1D receptors, which distinguishes itself from tryptamine and derivatives in exerting high intrinsic activity at these receptors in vascular and neuronal models relevant to migraine.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
launch of the first selective 5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT)1B/1D receptor agonist sumatriptan
(Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
) in the early 1990s has been hailed as the
most significant advance in the acute treatment of migraine since the
introduction of dihydroergotamine (DHE) more than 50 years ago.
Sumatriptan therefore represented a major new therapeutic principle in
migraine, selectively activating 5-HT1B/1D
receptor subtypes (previously 5-HT1-like;
Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
). Although the precise mechanism by which
sumatriptan alleviates migraine is still not fully elucidated, three
distinct pharmacological actions on the vasculature and neurons have
been invoked to explain its antimigraine effect. Vasoconstriction of cranial blood vessels (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
; Ferrari and Saxena,
1993
), inhibition of neurogenic inflammation involving reduced
vasodilator sensory neuropeptide release from peripheral (dural)
trigeminal nerve terminals (Moskowitz, 1992
) and/or inhibition of
firing of trigeminal neurons (Hoskin et al., 1996
) have been proposed.
Sumatriptan is an effective acute treatment for migraine (Ferrari,
1998
), but it has major limitations: low oral bioavailability (see
Goadsby, 1998b
), fewer than half of the patients who are treated are
pain free at 2 h after drug administration, and about one third of
responders experience headache recurrence within 24 to 48 h
(Ferrari, 1998
). The room for improvement over the clinical
effectiveness of sumatriptan is therefore substantial. Thus, newer
agents, all of which are tryptamine derivatives, including naratriptan,
rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, have improved oral bioavailabilities
(40-74%; Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998b
) but apparently have not
superseded sumatriptan in terms of therapeutic effectiveness according
to initial reports (Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998a
, b
). Indeed, a
limited therapeutic response ("ceiling effect") to this class of
agents in aborting a migraine attack is currently being unveiled
(Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby, 1998a
, b
).
The rationale for our chemical approach was to take advantage of the
superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with
tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors because we
hypothesized that the magnitude of the intrinsic activity that is
produced at 5-HT1B/1D receptors by selective
agonists is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine
effectiveness. Most, if not all, of the selective
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from
tryptamine that have been described to date, including sumatriptan,
naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan, behave as
partial agonists with respect to the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Connor et
al., 1997
; Martin et al., 1997
; Pauwels et al., 1997
; Willems et al.,
1998
). Moreover, it might be considered, on theoretical grounds, that the relatively low intrinsic activity of the currently available 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists might limit their
therapeutic effectiveness in alleviating migraine. In principle, a
high-efficacy agonist will have the advantage over a lower efficacy
agonist (i.e., a partial agonist) in producing full responses whatever
the extent of receptor reserve in the tissue or organ in question
(Kenakin, 1993
). Thus, and in contrast to a partial agonist, a
high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist can be
expected to elicit large amplitude responses throughout the entire
peripheral and central trigeminovascular system where
5-HT1B/1D receptors are located. The outcome of
our research effort is F 11356 (Perez et al., 1995
; Fig.
1), which is presently shown to exert
potent and selective actions, and exceptionally high efficacy at
5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors
both in vitro and in vivo in models relevant to the vascular and
neurogenic hypotheses in migraine. Because F 11356 is orally active,
has a long duration of action, gains access to the brain, and is well tolerated in animals, the drug is endowed with the potential to provide
acute therapeutic relief from migraine headache, which is superior to
that offered by currently available treatments.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All experiments were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Counsel Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC), and the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NIH publication no. 85-23, revised 1985) and were approved by the local ethics committee.
Receptor-Binding Assays.
F 11356 and other ligands were
examined in vitro using membrane preparations from brain tissue or
mammalian cell lines expressing recombinant 5-HT receptors.
Radioligand-binding studies were performed as previously described in
cell lines that had been transfected with the following receptors or
gene products: human (h) 5-HT1A (HeLa/HA7:
Pauwels and Palmier, 1995
), h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D (Cos-7: Pauwels et al., 1995
; C6 rat
glioma: Pauwels et al., 1996
, 1997
; Wurch et al., 1997b
), rabbit
5-HT1B (Cos-7: Wurch et al., 1997b
), rat
5-HT1B (Cos-7: Pleus and Bylund, 1992
), guinea
pig 5-HT1B (C6 rat glioma: Pauwels et al.,
1998b
), rat and guinea pig 5-HT1D (Cos-7: Wurch
et al., 1997a
), h 5-HT1E and h
5-HT1F (Cos-7: Pauwels et al. 1997
), h
5-HT2A (HEK 293: Leysen et al., 1982
), h
5-HT5A (Cos-7: Rees et al., 1994
), h
5-HT6 (Cos-7: Monsma et al., 1993
), h
5-HT7 (Cos-7: To et al., 1995
), and rat
5-HT7 (Cos-7: Shen et al., 1993
).
Inhibition of Forskolin-Induced Cyclic AMP (cAMP) Formation.
Inhibition of forskolin (100 µM)-induced cAMP formation in C6 glioma
cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B, h
5-HT1D, or h 5-HT1A receptors, respectively, by F 11356 and other ligands was investigated as described previously (Pauwels et al. 1996
).
Stimulation of Specific
[35S]Guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
(GTP
S) Radioligand Binding.
[35S]GTP
S specific binding was determined in
the presence or absence of F 11356 and other ligands in C6 glioma cell
membranes stably expressing h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors, as described previously
(Pauwels et al. 1997
). Maximal stimulation of specific [35S]GTP
S binding was expressed as a
percentage of the response obtained with 10 µM 5-HT.
Contractile Responses in Rabbit Isolated Saphenous Vein.
Rabbit isolated saphenous vein rings with intact endothelium were
prepared for isometric tension recording, as previously described
(Valentin et al., 1996
), in the presence of
N
-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 µM) to inhibit
endothelial NO synthase. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were
determined for F 11356, 5-HT, sumatriptan, and naratriptan in either
the presence or absence of the mixed 5-HT1B/1D
receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994
).
Stimulation of Outward K+ Current in Guinea Pig
Isolated Trigeminal Ganglion Cells.
Guinea pig trigeminal ganglion
cells were isolated from right and left ganglia as described by Liu and
Simon (1994)
and were cultured for 12 to 18 h at 37°C in 5%
CO2 in a Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% heat-inactivated DCS. Outward K+
currents were studied as described previously (Le Grand et al., 1998a
)
in trigeminal ganglion cells using the patch-clamp technique in the
whole-cell configuration. Cumulative concentration-effect curves were
obtained for F 11356 and sumatriptan, with each concentration being
applied for 3 min. Steady-state outward currents
(IKss) were measured at the end of a
3-s test pulse (stimulation frequency = 0.05 Hz) relative to the
current before the beginning of the test pulse. Experiments were
repeated in either the presence or absence of GR 127935 (0.1 µM).
Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs.
Rectal temperature was measured
to the nearest 0.1°C in male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (300-400 g;
Charles River, France) as described by Skingle et al. (1994)
.
Temperature measurements were taken immediately before the oral
administration of F 11356 and other compounds, and at 15 and 30 min and
1, 2, 4, and 8 h after drug or vehicle administration. Drugs were
administered in 1% methyl cellulose in distilled water.
38.2°C) in 50% of the animals. Temperatures of
38.2°C were considered to be significantly reduced because in
preliminary experiments, values of
38.2°C occurred only in 1 of 230 (0.4%) control animals. Also, baseline body temperature was
38.4-39.1°C in all animals in the present study.
Carotid Hemodynamics in Anesthetized Pigs. Male Landrace pigs (19-25 kg; M. Gaec, Soreze, France) were anesthetized with azaperone (3 mg/kg i.m.) followed by sodium pentobarbital (25 mg/kg i.v. bolus and 10-20 mg/kg/h infusion) and then intubated and artificially ventilated (Alpha100, Minerve, Esternay, France) with a mixture of room air and oxygen (0.5-1 liter/min). Blood gases and arterial pressure were maintained within physiological limits. Heparin (500 IU/kg i.v.) was also administered. Before thoracotomy, catheters were placed in the inferior vena cava via the left saphenous vein for drug/vehicle administration and in the right saphenous vein for anesthesia. Femoral arteries were cannulated (7F; Vygon, Ecouen, France) for aortic blood pressure measurements (Statham P10EZ transducers) or for arterial blood gas determinations (ABL-510; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Blood flow was measured in left and right common carotid arteries and left anterior descending coronary artery by means of appropriately sized flow probes connected to a pulsed Doppler flow amplifier (VF1; Crystal Biotech, Northboro, MA). Body temperature was maintained at 37-38°C (by means of a thermostated insulating blanket), and sterile saline was infused i.v. throughout the experiment to compensate fluid loss (0.5-1 liter total volume). Parameters were digitized and analyzed on line by computer using interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech). Calculated parameters were as follows: total carotid vascular resistance was derived from mean arterial pressure divided by total carotid blood flow, and coronary vascular resistance was derived from coronary perfusion pressure divided by left anterior descending coronary blood flow. Coronary perfusion pressure was determined as the difference between diastolic aortic pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
After a 30-min stabilization period, animals received an i.v. infusion of either vehicle [40% polyethylene glycol 300 in sterile saline (n = 9) or sterile saline (n = 10) in 52.5 ml over 105 min] or cumulative doses of F 11356 (0.01, 0.04, 0.16, 0.63, 2.5, 10, and 40 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7) or sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, or zolmitriptan (0.63, 2.5, 10, 40, 160, 630, and 2500 µg/kg i.v. in 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7). Note lower doses of F 11356 used due to higher potency of the drug. Parameters were measured up to 60 min after infusion of the highest dose of drug (or vehicle equivalent) was stopped for assessment of response recovery. In separate experiments, pigs received an i.v. infusion of GR 127935 (0.63 mg/kg, n = 6) or its vehicle (n = 7), followed 15 min later by F 11356 (0.01-40 µg/kg i.v., as above; 7.5 ml/15 min/dose, n = 7) or its vehicle (n = 6).Oral Activity in Conscious Dogs. Four male beagle dogs (18-25 kg; CEDS, Toucy, France) were sedated with a mixture of fentanyl and fluanizone (Hypnorm, 0.1 ml/kg i.m.), received atropine (0.02 mg/kg i.m.), and were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20-25 mg/kg i.v.). After intubation, anesthesia was maintained under artificial ventilation with isoflurane (1-2%) in oxygen (2-4 liters/min) and room air (5-6 liters/min). Under sterile conditions, a ventral neck incision was made, the left carotid artery was isolated, and an appropriately sized pulsed Doppler flow probe (2.8-3.2 mm; Crystal Biotech) was placed around the vessel and secured. Cables were externalized under the neck skin between the scapulae, in an anchor button system (Bioseb, Chaville, France), to maintain sterility. After surgery, each dog was treated with buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg s.c.) and penicillin-procaine (Duphaphen-LA; 0.2 ml/kg i.m.) for 3 days for analgesic and antibiotic coverage, respectively. During the postoperative period, dogs were trained to lie quietly in a cage. Experiments were conducted 2 to 3 weeks after surgery, and external wires were protected by a nylon vest (Phymep, Paris, France) that the dogs had previously been trained to wear. The four-limb electrocardiogram was derived from lead II and was used for computerized calculation of heart rate. Carotid blood flow and electrocardiographic signals were digitized and recorded on line using interactive software (Dataflow; Crystal Biotech).
The effects of orally administered drugs (F 11356, sumatriptan, naratriptan, or zolmitriptan) or placebo (gelatin capsules, 44000 KS, Capsugel) on carotid flow, electrocardiography, and behavior were observed continuously for the first 4 h and then at 6- and 12-h intervals after drug or placebo administration. For each experiment, each animal received only one dose of a particular drug, and a washout period of 7 days was observed between experiments.In Vivo Receptor Selectivity Studies.
Behavioral studies
were performed in rats in which lower-lip retraction, flat body
posture, and forepaw treading were quantified as described previously
(Kleven et al., 1995
; n = 6 rats/group).
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
Studies of contractile
responses in canine isolated coronary arteries were performed as
described previously (Valentin et al., 1998
). Effects in isolated,
Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts were assessed as described by Le
Grand et al. (1998b)
. Effects on action potentials recorded in isolated
guinea pig papillary muscle were evaluated as described by Le Grand et
al. (1995)
.
Data Analysis. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Concentration- and dose-response curves were fitted using the Marquardt algorithm by means of appropriate software (Origin; Microcal, Northhampton, MA), which gave geometric EC50 or ED50 values with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analysis was performed on absolute values by ANOVA with or without repeated measurements followed by the Dunnett's post hoc test, as appropriate (Sigmastat; Jandel GmbH, Erkrath, Germany; or Statview; Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA), unless stated otherwise. p < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Drugs and Vehicles. F 11356 hydrochloride, sumatriptan hydrochloride, rizatriptan hemisulfate, zolmitriptan base, naratriptan base, GR 127935 dihydrochloride, and (+)-flesinoxan hydrochloride were synthesized by the Divisions of Medicinal Chemistry IV and Analytical Chemistry at the Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre.
All other agents used, including 5-HT, creatinine sulfate, ketanserin tartrate, idazoxan hydrochloride, DHE mesylate, prazosin hydrochloride, indomethacin, and L-NAME were purchased commercially (RBI, Natick, MA; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; and Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK). For in vitro experiments, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, GR 127935, 5-HT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, prazosin, indomethacin, idazoxan, L-NAME, (+)-flesinoxan, and DHE were dissolved in distilled water, whereas naratriptan, zolmitriptan, and F 11356 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide such that the final bath concentration did not exceed 0.1%. For in vivo studies, drugs were weighed as base, taking into account the salt-to-base ratio. Sumatriptan and rizatriptan were dissolved in sterile saline, whereas F 11356, zolmitriptan, and naratriptan were dissolved in polyethylene glycol (40%) in sterile saline.| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Affinity, Potency, Efficacy, and Selectivity of F 11356 at Human and Nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D Receptors. F 11356 had subnanomolar affinity for cloned human, guinea pig, rabbit, and rat 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, with pKi values ranging from 9.3 to 10.3 (Table 1). F 11356 had 50 times less binding affinity for the human and rat 5-HT1A receptor (pKi = 7.6-7.8; Table 1) and low affinity for other 5-HT receptor subtypes, including the h 5-HT1F-binding site (Table 1). Thus, F 11356 had high affinity at and high selectivity for 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors. F 11356 did not distinguish between 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, possessing equivalent affinity at these sites (Table 1).
|
S binding in C6 glioma cells stably
transfected with h 5-HT1B or h
5-HT1D receptor genes. As shown in Table
2, F 11356 was the most potent compound
in inhibiting cAMP accumulation mediated by h
5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D
receptors and was notably more potent than 5-HT; only zolmitriptan was
equipotent to F 11356 in mediating h 5-HT1D
responses. No significant differences were observed in maximal
responses evoked by the agonists (data not shown; see also Pauwels et
al., 1997
|
S binding via h
5-HT1B and h5-HT1D
receptors, and was equipotent to DHE (Table 2). A major finding of
these studies is that F 11356 stimulated specific
[35S]GTP
S binding with greater potency but
with similar efficacy compared with the endogenous agonist 5-HT (Fig.
2) at both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors. Among the tryptamine
derivatives investigated, only zolmitriptan and sumatriptan approached
the efficacy of 5-HT or F 11356 at the h 5-HT1B
but not at the h 5-HT1D receptor (Fig. 2).
Tryptamine produced maximum enhancement of specific
[35S]GTP
S binding at h
5-HT1B receptors of only 56 ± 5.5%
(n = 3). Rizatriptan, DHE, and naratriptan exhibited
relative efficacy at h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors higher than tryptamine but lower
than all other compounds shown in Fig. 2.
|
In Vitro Vascular and Neuronal Actions of F 11356.
In isolated
rabbit saphenous vein rings prepared for isometric tension recording as
described previously (Valentin et al., 1996
), F 11356 was equipotent to
5-HT and more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and
sumatriptan in producing contractile responses (Table
3). Furthermore, like
naratriptan, F 11356, produced equivalent maximal responses to 5-HT,
whereas superior maximal responses compared with 5-HT were elicited by
sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan. Contractile responses
evoked by F 11356 were antagonized by GR 127935 in a noncompetitive
manner, with a pIC50 value of 9.3 (8.6-10.1),
and were abolished by 0.1 µM.
|
|
4.3 ± 0.8%; p = NS compared with vehicle; data not shown).
When the calcium ion chelator EGTA (5 mM) was included in the patch
pipette, F 11356 (1 µM) produced no increase in outward
K+ current (Fig. 3B).
|
In Vivo Activity of F 11356 at Carotid Arterial
5-HT1B/1D Receptors.
Baseline values of hemodynamic
parameters in anesthetized pigs are shown in Table
4. F 11356, administered as cumulative i.v. infusions to anesthetized pigs, induced a pronounced, dose-related reduction in total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 0.53 (0.42-0.67) µg/kg i.v.]. F 11356 simultaneously evoked large
magnitude increases in total carotid vascular resistance (Fig.
4A). Mean systemic arterial pressure was
increased by F 11356 only at the dose of 10 µg/kg (maximum change,
17 ± 5%, p < .05 compared with vehicle, Fig.
4A). Sumatriptan failed to significantly decrease total carotid blood
flow or to affect mean arterial pressure (p = NS) and
produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total
carotid vascular resistance (Fig. 4B). Naratriptan significantly
reduced total carotid blood flow only at the dose of 40 µg/kg
(p < .05 compared with vehicle) and, like sumatriptan,
produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of increases in total
carotid vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure (Fig. 4C).
Zolmitriptan and rizatriptan dose-dependently and moderately reduced
total carotid blood flow [ED50 = 5.6 (2.8-11.2)
and 19.8 (6.8-57.0), respectively]. Although zolmitriptan produced
dose-dependent, moderate increases in total carotid vascular resistance
(Fig. 4D), rizatriptan significantly (p < .05)
increased total carotid vascular resistance at 40 µg/kg but not at
other doses (Fig. 4E). Zolmitriptan produced slight increases in mean
arterial pressure at 10 and 40 µg/kg (Fig. 4D), whereas rizatriptan
was without effect (Fig. 4E). Near-maximal reductions in total carotid
blood flow (
48 ± 4%; p < .05 compared with
vehicle) and increased total carotid vascular resistance (99 ± 8%; p < .05 compared with vehicle) with F 11356 were
only slowly reversible, being maintained for at least 60 min after the
infusion of F 11356 was stopped (Fig. 5).
As illustrated in Fig. 5, increases in total carotid vascular
resistance had returned to near-control values 60 min after the
infusion of sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan was
stopped, which is in contrast to that observed with F 11356. The drugs
and vehicle investigated had no significant effects on heart rate or
coronary vascular resistance (data not shown).
|
|
|
50 ± 3%, p < .05) were abolished (+26 ± 11%, p = NS; and
15 ± 6%,
p = NS, respectively, compared with GR 127935 alone).
GR 127935 per se weakly increased carotid vascular resistance (maximum
change, +34 ± 18% compared with +4 ± 7% in the vehicle
group, p < .05) and tended to reduce total carotid
blood flow (maximum change,
20 ± 10% compared with +3 ± 4% in the vehicle-group, p = NS).
In conscious dogs, baseline heart rate and mean left carotid blood flow
values before drug/placebo administration were similar in all groups
(Table 5). Orally administered F 11356 dose-dependently reduced carotid
blood flow from 0.63 mg/kg (n = 3) without
significantly affecting heart rate (Fig.
6). F 11356 (0.16 mg/kg,
n = 4) failed to significantly affect carotid blood
flow or heart rate (data not shown). Decreases in carotid blood flow
evoked by F 11356 were long lasting, remaining significantly reduced
12 h after the administration at 2.5 mg/kg p.o. (n = 4; Fig. 6A). As shown in Fig. 6A, decreases in carotid blood flow
were noticeable within 30 min after F 11356 administration.
Furthermore, F 11356 failed to produce clinical signs over 48 h
after administration. Sumatriptan (2.5 and 10 mg/kg, n = 4 and 3, respectively) and naratriptan and zolmitriptan (both at 0.16 mg/kg, n = 4 in each case, and 0.63 mg/kg,
n = 4 and 3, respectively) failed to significantly reduce carotid blood flow (data not shown). Prominent clinical signs
were observed in each animal after 2.5 mg/kg sumatriptan and 0.63 mg/kg
naratriptan and zolmitriptan and included mydriasis, exophthalmos,
vocalization, restlessness, tachycardia, apprehension, and increased
respiratory rate. These clinical signs were observed for up to 12 h after drug administration. Placebo had no significant effects on
carotid blood flow, heart rate, or clinical signs (Fig. 6).
|
Hypothermia in Guinea Pigs. Orally administered F 11356 evoked hypothermic responses in guinea pigs and was found to be more potent than sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and DHE (Table 6). Relatively high doses (up to 40 mg/kg) of sumatriptan and DHE failed to produce hypothermic responses of sufficient magnitude to determine ED50 values.
|
In Vivo Receptor Selectivity of F 11356.
The in vitro
procedures described earlier indicated that F 11356 had affinity for
5-HT1A receptors that is 50-fold lower than that
for 5-HT1B/1D receptors. In rats, characteristic
behavioral effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists
such as lower-lip retraction, flat body posture, or forepaw treading
(Kleven et al., 1995
) were not observed after a high dose of F 11356 (40 mg/kg p.o.; data not given).
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
The studies performed in
anesthetized pigs and conscious dogs described earlier demonstrate that
F 11356, at the pharmacological doses investigated, is devoid of any
major hemodynamic side effects. The following studies have been carried
out to extend its cardiovascular profile: Contractile responses evoked
by F 11356 were compared with those of DHE, naratriptan, and
sumatriptan in the canine isolated coronary artery as described
previously (Valentin et al., 1998
; n = 15-17
rings/group) in the absence of endothelium. All four agonists
contracted coronary arteries, with a rank order of potency
(pD2 values) of DHE [6.9 (5.3-7.9)]
naratriptan [6.8 (5.7-7.3)]
F 11356 [6.7 (5.7-7.3)] > sumatriptan [4.8 (3.6-5.6)]. Rank order of intrinsic activity
(Emax ± S.E.M.) was sumatriptan (2.5 ± 0.6 mN) > naratriptan (1.7 ± 0.6 mN) > F
11356 (1.0 ± 0.4 mN) > DHE (0.6 ± 0.2 mN). No
significant differences were noted between
Emax values. However,
Emax values produced by all four drugs
were substantially lower than those evoked by an approximate EC50 concentration (10 nM) of the thromboxane
A2 analog U 46619 (27.5 ± 3.9 mN),
indicating relatively weak contractile responses induced by F 11356, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and DHE.
91.7 ± 1.05 versus
91.4 ± 0.6 mV), action potential
amplitude (127.0 ± 1.5 versus 127.4 ± 1.4 mV), maximal
upstroke velocity (155.2 ± 9.4 versus 147.9 ± 8.1 V/s), or
action potential duration at 90% repolarization (208.2 ± 6.0 versus 208.8 ± 4.0 ms), indicating that on the basis of these
data, F 11356 appears to be devoid of arrhythmogenic potential.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT derivative that has been designed to take advantage of the superior potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT compared with tryptamine at 5-HT1B/1D receptors. Indeed, the most striking feature of the pharmacological profile of F 11356, besides high potency and selectivity, is the uniquely high level of intrinsic activity exerted by the compound at 5-HT1B/1D receptors.
Radioligand Binding and Cellular Assays. F 11356 has subnanomolar affinity for recombinant human and nonhuman 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, does not distinguish between the two subtypes, and displays high selectivity over other 5-HT-binding sites, including 5-HT1F sites. F 11356 has low or no detectable affinity for a number of major neurotransmitter, autacoid, ion channel, or reuptake binding sites (unpublished observations). Moderate (submicromolar) affinity was shown for F 11356 at 5-HT1A receptors, and the intact cell cAMP assay yielded similarly weak 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity for F 11356. The radioligand-binding profile of F 11356 is one of a high-affinity, high-selectivity 5-HT1B/1D receptor ligand.
F 11356 was the most potent inhibitor of cAMP accumulation in C6 glioma cells stably expressing h 5-HT1B or h 5-HT1D receptors, although zolmitriptan was equipotent to F 11356 at h 5-HT1D receptors. Similarly, F 11356 was also more potent than tryptamine and its derivatives, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, naratriptan, and rizatriptan, in enhancing specific [35S]GTP
S binding in
C6 glioma cell membranes expressing h 5-HT1B and
h 5-HT1D receptors. DHE was equipotent to F 11356 in enhancing specific [35S]GTP
S binding in
both h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D
systems. A striking finding in the latter study was the apparent
difference in maximal responses obtained with F 11356 compared with the
tryptamine derivatives and DHE. Agonist-stimulated
[35S]GTP
S binding is a measure of
receptor-coupled G protein activation and thus of agonist intrinsic
activity (Pauwels et al., 1997
S binding to
5-HT in both h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptor systems, which was superior to
that obtained with the tryptamine derivatives examined and DHE, with
the exception of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan at h
5-HT1B receptors. The high-efficacy properties of
F 11356 at these receptors also contribute to the high potency of the
compound. These data indicate that F 11356 behaves as a potent,
high-efficacy agonist at h 5-HT1B and h
5-HT1D receptors, in a similar manner to the
endogenous agonist 5-HT.
In Vitro Activity in Vascular and Neuronal Models.
5-HT1B receptors have been shown to mediate
vasoconstriction (Hamel et al., 1993
; Valentin et al., 1996
), and any
involvement of 5-HT1D receptors in mediating
vasoconstriction has not been thus far demonstrated. The isolated
rabbit saphenous vein is a well established preparation in which
potency and efficacy characteristics of 5-HT1B/1D
receptor agonists have been determined (Martin and MacLennan, 1990
). F
11356 induced 5-HT1B receptor-mediated
contractions of isolated rabbit saphenous vein rings with a similar
potency and maximal response as those of 5-HT. Naratriptan,
sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan were less potent than F
11356. Although naratriptan produced equivalent maximum responses to F
11356 and 5-HT, those generated by rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and
zolmitriptan were of greater magnitude. As shown for sumatriptan
(Valentin et al., 1996
), a component of the contractile responses
evoked by rizatriptan and zolmitriptan is dependent on an intact
endothelium, suggesting the release of an endothelium-derived
contraction factor (Valentin et al., 1996
). However, this does not
appear to apply to F 11356 or naratriptan because both produced
equivalent maximum responses to 5-HT. In agreement with this finding,
no significant differences in maximum responses were noted between F
11356, 5-HT, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, and naratriptan in
the absence of endothelium (unpublished observations). Sensitivity of
contractile responses evoked by F 11356 to the mixed
5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (Clitherow et al., 1994
) supports the involvement of
5-HT1B receptors in mediating these responses, as
described previously for 5-HT, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, and sumatriptan
(Valentin et al., 1996
). The greater potency of F 11356 and 5-HT
compared with that of the tryptamine derivatives investigated is also
due in part to the high-efficacy characteristics of the former two
compounds at the saphenous vein 5-HT1B receptor. These data provide further confirmation of the superior potency of F
11356 at 5-HT1B receptors compared with the
tryptamine derivatives investigated and similar potency of F 11356 as
that of 5-HT. These data also demonstrate that F 11356 is active at the
vascular level, which is in line with the vascular hypothesis of
migraine (Ferrari and Saxena, 1993
).
In Vivo Pharmacological Profile of F 11356.
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists elicit
vasoconstriction in the carotid vascular bed of dogs (Feniuk et al.,
1989
) and pigs (Den Boer et al., 1991
). This pharmacological activity
is considered to be of importance in the migraine abortive effects of
5-HT1B/1D (previously
5-HT1-like) receptor agonists (Feniuk et al.,
1989
; Den Boer et al., 1991
; De Vries et al., 1996
) and is a key
element of the vascular hypothesis (Humphrey and Feniuk, 1991
; Ferrari and Saxena, 1993
). In anesthetized pigs, F 11356 elicited carotid vasoconstriction in a highly selective manner with respect to systemic
arterial pressure or coronary vascular resistance. F 11356 was more
than 10 times more potent than naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan,
or zolmitriptan in reducing carotid blood flow and consistently
produced greater maximum responses. Dose dependence of carotid
vasoconstriction elicited by sumatriptan and naratriptan had a
bell-shaped aspect suggestive of low agonist efficacy; and activation
of other mechanisms at higher doses to explain the downturn phase of
the dose-response curve can be excluded because sumatriptan-induced
carotid vasoconstriction is mediated exclusively by
5-HT1B/1D receptors (De Vries et al., 1996
).
In Vivo Receptor Selectivity. F 11356 failed to produce behavioral effects in rats, even at a relatively high dose (40 mg/kg), indicating that receptor selectivity of F 11356 for 5-HT1B/1D receptors versus 5-HT1A receptors is maintained in vivo.
Further Cardiovascular Studies.
Data obtained in vitro with F
11356 in canine coronary artery rings revealed that the compound
produced equivalent, low-amplitude maximal responses to sumatriptan,
naratriptan, and DHE and was more potent than sumatriptan but less
potent than naratriptan and DHE. In view of the high-efficacy
properties of F 11356 compared with the other compounds investigated,
greater maximal responses might have been expected but were not
observed, which is in accord with the absence of changes in coronary
vascular resistance in anesthetized pigs and the high degree of
craniovascular selectivity exhibited by F 11356 in vivo described
earlier. We have no obvious explanation as to why F 11356 behaves in a
similar fashion to the tryptamine derivatives studied and DHE in
producing weak coronary vasoconstriction. One possible reason is that
5-HT1B receptor-effector coupling in this tissue
can produce only limited contractile responses, even on maximal
activation. Although relatively weak contractile responses evoked by
5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists in isolated coronary arteries have been shown by others (Connor et al., 1997
; Maassen Van
Den Brink et al., 1998
; Valentin et al., 1998
), further studies are
required to address this important issue.
Conclusion.
In summary, F 11356 is a novel arylpiperazide 5-HT
derivative; is a selective, high-potency agonist at
5-HT1B/1D receptors; and distinguishes itself
from tryptamine and derivatives and DHE in exerting exceptional
intrinsic activity at these receptors in models relevant to the
vascular and neurogenic hypotheses of migraine. By virtue of its
high-efficacy properties at 5-HT1B/1D receptors,
F 11356 displays hitherto unobserved high levels of craniovascular
selectivity in vivo with respect to coronary and systemic
vasoconstriction. Despite high intrinsic activity at 5-HT1B receptors, the amplitude of canine
coronary vasoconstriction evoked by F 11356 was not greater than that
observed with sumatriptan, naratriptan, or DHE. The level of intrinsic
activity of F 11356 obtained at 5-HT1B/1D
receptors is comparable to that of the endogenous agonist 5-HT. The
selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists derived from tryptamine that have been described thus far, including
sumatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and eletriptan,
behave as partial agonists (i.e., have low agonist efficacy at these receptors with respect to 5-HT; Connor et al., 1997
; Martin et al.,
1997
; Pauwels et al., 1997
; Willems et al., 1998
), which might limit
their oral clinical antimigraine effectiveness (Ferrari, 1998
; Goadsby,
1998a
, b
). Clinical studies with a high-efficacy 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, of which F 11356 is
the first, are therefore justified to verify the hypothesis that the
magnitude of intrinsic activity at these receptors is a key determinant of therapeutic antimigraine effectiveness. F 11356 is orally active, gains access to the central nervous system, has a long duration of
action, and is well tolerated. As a putative antimigraine drug, F 11356 may exert high-efficacy agonist activity throughout the entire
trigeminovascular system in which 5-HT1B/1D
receptors are located: at its peripheral sensory nerve-vessel interface
and the ganglion and central (brain stem) levels. Thus, F 11356 has the
potential to exert greater therapeutic antimigraine activity than
other, currently available treatments.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to our colleagues in the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases II, Neurobiology I and II, and Medicinal Chemistry IV and the Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology for excellent technical assistance; to Drs. J. P. Ribet, J. L. Maurel, and C. Jorand-Lebrun for the synthesis of reference compounds; to G. Guerin and S. Cecco for excellent secretarial assistance; and to Dr. J. M. Guillon for critical comments and help with the figures.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication March 4, 1999.
Received for publication December 14, 1998.
1
Part of this work was presented at the IUPHAR meeting
held in München, Germany, July 1998, and has been published in
abstract form (John et al., 1998a
, b
; Pauwels et al.,
1998a
).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. G. W. John, Centre de Recherche Pierre FABRE, 17 Ave. Jean Moulin, 81106 Castres Cedex, France. E-mail: gareth.john{at}pierre-fabre.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin);
DHE, dihydroergotamine;
F 11356, 4-[4-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yloxyl]acetyl]piperazinyl-1-yl]benzonitrile
HCl;
GTP
S, guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate;
GR
127935, 2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl[1,2,4]oxadiozol-3-yl)biphenyl-4-carboxylic
acid[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl piperazin-1-yl)phenyl]amide 2 HCl;
cAMP, cyclic AMP;
L-NAME, N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl
ester;
U 46619, 9,11-dideoxy-9
,11
-methanoepoxy
PGF2
.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor subtype in human and bovine cerebral arteries.
Mol Pharmacol
44:
242-246[Abstract].
receptor sites.
Neuropharmacology
34:
235-237[Medline].
, 5-HT1D
, 5-HT1A and opossum 5-HT1B receptor.
Eur J Pharmacol
290:
95-103[Medline].
receptors and cloned human 5-HT1D
, sheep and bovine caudate nucleus 5-HT1D receptor sites.
Cell Pharmacol
2:
183-191.
S binding studies with stably transfected C6-glial cell lines.
Neuropharmacology
36:
499-512[Medline].
serotonin receptor gene expression in trigeminal ganglia: Implication for anti-migraine drug development.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
3666-3669This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Letienne, J.-C. Blanchet, E. Sole, G. W. John, and B. Le Grand Donitriptan Decreases Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation in Rats in the Absence of Cranial Vasoconstriction: An Overlooked Mechanism of Antimigraine Action? J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2005; 315(2): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Letienne, Y. Verscheure, and G. W. John Investigation of the Effects of Naratriptan, Rizatriptan, and Sumatriptan on Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation in Anesthetized Pigs: Implications for Their Mechanism of Acute Antimigraine Action J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Letienne, Y. Verscheure, M. Perez, B. Le Grand, F. C. Colpaert, and G. W. John Donitriptan Selectively Decreases Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation in the Anesthetized Pig: Further Insights into Its Mechanism of Action Relevant to Headache Relief J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 749 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Roth, E. Lopez, S. Patel, and W. K. Kroeze The Multiplicity of Serotonin Receptors: Uselessly Diverse Molecules or an Embarrassment of Riches? Neuroscientist, August 1, 2000; 6(4): 252 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||