![]() |
|
|
Vol. 289, Issue 1, 266-277, April 1999
Departments of Pharmacology (N.R.Z., G.A.L., G.A.G.) and Psychiatry (G.A.G.), Neuroscience Training Program (N.R.Z., G.A.G.), and Rocky Mountain Center for Sensor Technology (N.R.Z., G.A.G.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitors are expected to decrease dopamine (DA) clearance from the extracellular space of the brain. However, mazindol and cocaine have been reported to "anomalously" increase DA clearance rate. To better understand in vivo DAT activity both in the absence and presence of DAT inhibitors, clearance of exogenously applied DA was measured in dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats using high-speed chronoamperometry. As higher amounts of DA were ejected, DA signal amplitudes, but not time courses, increased. Clearance rates increased until near maximal rates of 0.3 to 0.5 µM/s were attained. Provided baseline clearance rates were relatively low (< 0.1 µM/s), local application of either nomifensine or cocaine markedly increased exogenous DA signal amplitudes and time courses. Relative to the low baseline group, locally applied nomifensine decreased clearance rate when baseline clearance was high (~0.4 µM/s). However, even when baseline clearance rates were high, systemic injection of nomifensine, mazindol, GBR 12909, or benztropine increased DA signal amplitudes to a greater extent than time courses, consistent with the observed increases in clearance rates. In contrast, despite low baseline clearance rates, systemic injection of cocaine, WIN 35,428, or d-amphetamine preferentially increased DA signal time course, consistent with the observed decreases in clearance rates. Our results emphasize that as extracellular DA concentrations increase, DAT velocity increases to a maximum, partially explaining the ability of DAT inhibitors to increase DA clearance rates. However, by itself, kinetic activation is not sufficient to explain the ability of certain systemically administered DAT inhibitors to anomalously increase DA clearance.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
dopamine transporter (DAT) plays an important role in terminating
dopaminergic neurotransmission and in setting overall dopaminergic tone
in the central nervous system. The activity of the DAT in intact brain
can be assessed in real time using in vivo electrochemical recording to
measure the clearance of extracellular dopamine (DA; Ewing and
Wightman, 1984
; Stamford et al., 1984
; Cass et al., 1992
; Ng et al.,
1992
; Suaud-Chagny et al., 1995
). It has been established that
clearance of both stimulation-evoked endogenous DA and locally applied
exogenous DA can reliably reflect DAT activity (Wightman et al., 1988
;
Cass et al., 1993b
). Alterations in DAT activity and DA clearance are associated with changes in the amplitudes and/or time courses of the
voltammetric DA signals (May et al., 1988
; Cass et al., 1993b
;
Suaud-Chagny et al., 1995
). Also, the slope of the initial, pseudolinear portion of the declining DA signal, which takes into account changes in both signal amplitude and time course, has been used
as a quantitative measure of DA clearance rate (Stamford et al., 1984
;
Wightman et al., 1988
; Ng et al., 1992
).
The activity of the DAT is inhibited by many of the psychomotor
stimulants with high abuse liability, such as cocaine and d-amphetamine, and by other clinically used drugs, such as
benztropine and mazindol. Cocaine, d-amphetamine,
benztropine, and mazindol-as well as a number of other agents such as
nomifensine,
1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl) methoxy]ethyl]-4-[3-phenylpropyl]piperazine
(GBR 12909), and (
)2-
-carbomethoxy-3-
-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane (CFT; WIN 35,428)-all bind to rat striatal DATs with relatively high
affinity and inhibit the accumulation of [3H]DA
(Javitch et al., 1984
; Dubocovich and Zahniser, 1985
; Andersen, 1989
;
Carroll et al., 1992
; Boja et al., 1995
). Most DAT inhibitors block the
DAT-mediated inward translocation, or uptake, of DA (Horn, 1990
;
Sonders et al., 1997
). However, the precise mechanism(s) by which they
inhibit DAT activity may differ (Meiergerd and Schenk, 1994
; Xu and
Reith, 1997
). In contrast, the primary effect of d-amphetamine is to reverse the DAT so that it predominately
translocates DA in an outward direction (Parker and Cubeddu, 1986
;
Sulzer et al., 1993
). However, regardless of the mechanism involved, it is well established that inhibition of DAT activity uniformly results
in elevated extracellular DA concentrations and psychomotor stimulation
(Nomikos et al., 1990
; Kuczenski et al., 1991
). Thus, exposure to DAT
inhibitors would be expected to decrease the rate of DA clearance; this
has often been observed (Wightman and Zimmerman, 1990
; Cass et al.,
1993a
). However, in some instances, exposure to DAT inhibitors such as
mazindol or cocaine "anomalously" increases DA clearance rate
(Stamford et al., 1986
; Ng et al., 1992
; Cass et al., 1993a
).
The goal of the present studies was to better understand the kinetics
of in vivo DAT activity, both in the absence and presence of DAT
inhibitors. In these experiments we used high-speed chronoamperometry in dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats to measure changes in
exogenous DA clearance. This method measures primarily DA uptake in the
absence of any direct contributions from released endogenous DA
(Gratton et al., 1988
; Cass et al., 1993b
; Zahniser et al., 1998
). We
first determined the quantitative relationship between extracellular DA
concentrations and DA clearance rates. We then investigated how DATs
respond to changes in extracellular DA concentrations induced by DAT
inhibitors, administered either locally or systemically, and how the
basal activity of DAT influences the subsequent effects produced by DAT inhibitors.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-380 g; SASCO, Omaha, NE) were used. Groups of four to six animals were housed under a 12-h light/dark cycle with food and water freely available. All animal use procedures were in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.
In Vivo Electrochemical Measurements.
The electrochemical
recording electrodes each contained a single carbon-fiber sealed in a
glass capillary (fiber diameter 30-33 µm; exposed length 90-160
µm) coated at high temperature with Nafion (5% solution, 6-8 coats
at 200°C, Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI; see Zahniser et al.,
1998
). The sensitivities and linearities were determined by generating
calibration curves at 22°C for each recording electrode in stock 0.1 M PBS solutions (pH 4). Responses of electrodes were linear for 2 to 10 µM and for 8 to 40 µM (reduced gain) increments of DA
(r2
0.997). The electrodes showed good
sensitivity to DA but were relatively insensitive to ascorbic acid,
with an average selectively ratio of DA to ascorbic acid of 2409 ± 383 to 1 (n = 41). They were also relatively
insensitive to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid.
3.8 to
5.4 mm.
Once in position, a calibrated volume of DA was applied by pressure
ejection (12.5-250 nl, 5-40 psi for 0.1-4 s) at 5-min intervals
until reproducible responses (variation in signal amplitudes of
<±10%) were obtained; this usually occurred within three or four
applications. The volume applied was determined and controlled using a
stereomicroscope fitted with a reticule in one eyepiece to measure the
movement of the meniscus in the micropipette (Friedemann and Gerhardt,
1992Data and Statistical Analysis.
Data are presented as mean
values ± S.E.M. N equals the number of animals, except
for the local drug application experiments in which N equals
the number of electrode/micropipette assembly placements. Three
parameters were calculated from the DA oxidation currents: 1) maximal
signal amplitude; 2) signal time course (T80), which is the time for the signal to rise to its maximum and to decay by
80%; and 3) clearance rate, which is the slope of the initial
pseudolinear portion (between the T20 and
T60 time points) of the decaying signal. The
validity and reliability of these parameters to reflect changes in DA
clearance have been demonstrated in a number of studies (Stamford et
al., 1984
; May et al., 1988
; Wightman et al., 1988
; Ng et al., 1992
;
Cass et al., 1993b
; Suaud-Chagny et al., 1995
). The amplitude reflects
changes in extracellular DA concentration. The
T80 reflects the time for the signal to return
essentially to baseline and takes into account changes in the
"tail" of the decay curve where the DA concentrations are lower;
this parameter is often preferentially affected by DAT inhibitors. The
clearance rate is an initial rate, taking into account changes in both
amplitude and time course.
Drugs.
Nomifensine maleate, mazindol, and GBR 12909 dihydrochloride were purchased from Research Biochemicals International
(Natick, MA). Benztropine mesylate and d-amphetamine sulfate
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). CFT methyl
ester tartrate and (
) cocaine HCl were obtained from National
Institute on Drug Abuse (Research Triangle Park, NC).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of Extracellular DA Concentration on In Vivo DA Clearance
Rate.
The relationship between the extracellular concentration of
exogenously applied DA and the in vivo clearance rate of DA was investigated in the medial dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats. Different extracellular concentrations were achieved by locally
pressure-ejecting different amounts (picomoles) of DA from the
electrochemical electrode/micropipette assemblies. Two different
approaches were compared: 1) ejecting four different volumes (25, 50, 75, or 100 nl) of DA from a single micropipette barrel and 2) ejecting
the same four volumes of DA from quadruple micropipette barrels, each
of which contained a different concentration of DA (200, 400, 600, or
800 µM). Oxidation and reduction currents were measured using
high-speed chronoamperometry. For simplicity, only data from oxidation
signals are reported here. The low micromolar concentrations of DA
transiently achieved in our experiments (Fig. 1) are substantially higher than the low
nanomolar steady-state endogenous DA levels found using in vivo
microdialysis (Kuczenski et al., 1991
; Kuczenski and Segal, 1992
).
However, the DA concentrations tested here may be physiologically
relevant for several reasons. First, electrical stimulation like that
used in brain stimulation reward studies (single 500-ms trains of
pulses applied to the ventral tegmental area) results in transient DA
concentrations as high as 4 µM (Gratton et al., 1988
). Second, the
velocity of the DAT did change in response to these DA concentrations
(vide infra), suggesting that they may be in the range normally
encountered by the DAT.
|
|
Effects of Locally-Applied DAT Inhibitors on In Vivo DA Clearance Rate. The relationship between the initial baseline exogenous DA clearance rate in medial dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats and the change in this rate induced by local application of a DAT inhibitor was next examined. First, reproducible baseline DA signals were obtained in response to locally applied DA (either 200 or 800 µM). Three baseline response groups were defined by their initial baseline clearance rates. The "low" and "medium" groups corresponded to application of 200 µM DA, whereas the "high" group corresponded to application of 800 µM DA. The low and medium clearance rates observed with the 200 µM DA likely reflect locally lower and higher densities of DATs, respectively. The mean initial baseline clearance rate of the high group was 0.30 ± 0.04 µM/s, ~20-fold higher than that of the low group and 5-fold higher than that of the medium group. The baseline signal amplitudes showed a similar profile, with the high group having a mean amplitude of 7.9 ± 0.44 µM; this amplitude was ~40-foldhigher than that of the low group and 8-fold higher than that of the medium group. In contrast, the mean T80 values ranged from 37 to 42 s and did not differ among the three groups. Each of these three groups was then randomly subdivided into two groups for the local nomifensine or cocaine application experiments (Table 1).
|
|
|
The Effects of Systemically Injected DAT Inhibitors on In Vivo DA Clearance Rate. The effect of systemic (i.p.) administration of DAT inhibitors on exogenous DA clearance rate in medial dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats was also explored. First, stable baseline signals were obtained in response to pressure-ejection of 200 µM DA (25-250 nl) from electrode/single-barrel micropipette assemblies (Table 2). The baseline amplitudes ranged from 1.6 to 5.9 µM, T80 values ranged from 16 to 41 s and clearance rates ranged from 0.10 to 0.48 µM/s. Subsequently, each animal received an i.p. injection of either saline or drug; we continued to eject DA once every 5 min and to monitor the resulting signals for the next 60 min. After saline injection, the amplitudes and T80 values of the exogenous DA signal slowly, but significantly, declined by 15 to 20% from baseline, whereas the clearance rates remained relatively constant. Because the control and drug experiments were interspersed, the results of all the saline experiments were combined and are shown with each of the drugs (Figs. 5-11).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the medial dorsal striata of urethane-anesthetized rats, we observed that exogenous DA signal amplitudes and clearance rates, but not signal time courses (T80 values), increased with increasing amounts of DA ejected. Thus, the velocity of DAT in vivo accelerated as extracellular DA concentrations increased until rates of 0.4 to 0.5 µM/s were attained. When baseline clearance rates were relatively low (<0.1 µM/s), local application of the DAT inhibitors nomifensine or cocaine markedly increased both DA signal amplitudes and times courses. Clearance rates were either increased or unaltered, presumably due to the balance between the higher activity of the uninhibited DATs in response to increasing extracellular DA concentrations and the inhibitory effects of nomifensine or cocaine. Decreased clearance rates, reflected as prolongation of signal time courses with little change in amplitude, were observed only when the baseline clearance rate was high (~0.4 µM/s). In contrast, the effects of systemically administered DAT inhibitors were not readily explained by differences in baseline DA clearance rates. Even when baseline clearance rates were high, systemic injection of nomifensine, mazindol, GBR 12909, or benztropine increased DA signal amplitudes to a greater extent than time courses. These results are consistent with the observed increases in clearance rates. On the other hand, systemic administration of cocaine, CFT, or d-amphetamine preferentially prolonged the duration of the DA signals, consistent with the observed decreases in clearance rate. Reduced clearance rates were observed even when the baseline clearance rates were low. Taken together, these data suggest that the mechanisms by which these two groups of DAT inhibitors, at least when administered systemically, affect transporter activity are not identical. Furthermore, our results emphasize that increased DA clearance rates can accompany DAT inhibition.
Two methods were used to increase exogenous extracellular DA
concentrations and resulted in similar maximal DAT clearance rates.
Different DA concentrations (200-800 µM) were ejected from quadruple-barrel micropipettes, or a wider range of volumes of 200 µM
DA was ejected from a single-barrel micropipette. With increasing
amounts of DA, higher amplitudes were observed. Generally, similar
amplitudes were detected for a given amount of DA ejected with both
methods. However, at the extremes, a significantly higher amplitude was
observed with the larger volume ejected, e.g., 100 nl of 200 µM DA
versus 25 nl of 800 µM DA (20 pmol DA; Fig. 1A). This difference may
reflect the different sized spheres of DA achieved in the brain
microenvironment (Nicholson, 1985
) and the 300-µm distance
between the ejection micropipette and the electrochemical electrode. In
contrast with the greater signal amplitudes, the signal time courses
were unchanged as DA concentrations increased. These results indicate
that clearance rate increased. It is well known that in vitro DAT
activity obeys Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Nicholson, 1995
). Thus, it is
not surprising that, as extracellular DA increased, in vivo DA
clearance rates increased in a saturable fashion until an apparent
maximal value of 0.4 to 0.5 µM/s was reached. A maximal rate of
~0.45 µM/s has also been observed when clearance of
K+-evoked endogenous DA was measured in dorsal
striatum of Fischer 344 rats (M.A. Hebert and G.A.G., unpublished
observations). Therefore, clearance rates for exogenous and endogenous
DA appear comparable in dorsal striatum.
The maximal in vivo DAT clearance rate derived here is also in good
agreement with those reported from a variety of in vitro and in vivo
techniques in rat striatal tissue. The range of
Vmax values summarized from the
literature is 0.1 to 0.8 µM/s (see Table 1 in Nicholson, 1995
). Curve
fitting of the concentration-clearance relationship in Fig. 2B revealed
a KT of 12 µM and a
Vmax of 0.7 µM/s. Nicholson (1995)
proposed that concentrations measured in vivo should be corrected by
the extracellular volume fraction,
= 0.21 (Rice and Nicholson,
1991
). Multiplying our Vmax value by
yields a maximal rate of 0.14 µM/s. The affinity of DAT for DA in
striatum is generally reported to be 0.1 to 0.4 µM (see Table 1 in
Nicholson, 1995
). However, the KT
value we derived (2.5 µM, corrected by
) was at least 6-fold
higher. The urethane anesthesia is unlikely to be the explanation for
the apparent lower affinity. For example, Jones et al. (1995b)
, using
fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to monitor the disappearance of
electrically-evoked DA release in striatum of urethane-anesthetized
rats and nonlinear regression of the Michaelis-Menten equation to
determine kinetic parameters for DA uptake, reported a
KT of 0.22 µM and a
Vmax of 3.8 µM/s. Furthermore,
Garris et al. (1997)
reported that the kinetic constants for striatal
DAT were similar in urethane-anesthetized and unanesthetized, freely
moving rats. It is possible that our KT value is inaccurate, given that the
clearance rate was measured from the pseudolinear portion of the
signals where the DA concentration is well above
KT.
DAT inhibitors increase in vivo extracellular DA concentrations
(Nomikos et al., 1990
; Kuczenski et al., 1991
), and higher concentrations of DA result in acceleration of DAT velocity (vide supra). Therefore, when subsaturating concentrations of both DA and DAT
inhibitors are present, one would predict that the rate of uptake by
the DATs that are unoccupied by inhibitor would be accelerated. With
local application of drugs, it is difficult to predict the
concentrations achieved. In addition, the drugs are applied only
transiently, which does not allow for steady state to develop.
Nonetheless, this method has been useful to demonstrate that DAT
inhibitors alter DA signals, whereas other drugs do not (Cass et al.,
1993b
). When baseline DA clearance rates were low (< 0.02 µM/s), we
observed marked, but transient, increases in both DA signal amplitudes
and time courses in response to local application of nomifensine or
cocaine. With nomifensine, clearance rate was also enhanced. This
effect is reminiscent of the "anomalous" DAT inhibitor-induced
increase in clearance rate previously reported for mazindol and cocaine
(Stamford et al., 1986
; Ng et al., 1992
; Cass et al., 1993a
). However,
when baseline clearance rates were high (0.4 µM/s), local application
of nomifensine reduced DA clearance rate, presumably because any
noninhibited DATs were already translocating DA at close to maximal rates.
Our results with systemically administered DAT inhibitors suggest,
however, that factors in addition to differences in baseline DA
clearance rates contribute to the observation that DAT inhibitors can
increase DA clearance rates. Each drug was administered at behaviorally
active doses, and significant inhibition of striatal DAT activity
resulted. Systemic injection of nomifensine, mazindol, GBR 12909, and
benztropine preferentially increased signal amplitudes and clearance
rates. No decrease in clearance rates occurred even when the baseline
clearance rates were high (0.3-0.5 µM/s), as was the case for
nomifensine and mazindol. In contrast, systemic administration of
cocaine, CFT, and d-amphetamine preferentially decreased
clearance rates and thereby increased the signal time courses. These
results were observed even though the majority of the baseline
clearance rates were somewhat lower, 0.1 to 0.2 µM/s. The most
striking effects were produced by d-amphetamine, which
dose-dependently diminished clearance rate. Interestingly, benztropine
produced different effects from cocaine and CFT, even though all three
compounds are tropane derivatives. It is tempting to speculate that
these different effects may play a role in the higher abuse potential
of drugs like cocaine and d-amphetamine (Foltin and
Fischman, 1991
). However, previously, both mazindol and cocaine have
been reported to increase DA clearance rate (Stamford et al., 1986
; Ng
et al., 1992
; Cass et al., 1993a
). Furthermore, Suaud-Chagny and
colleagues (1995)
, measuring clearance of electrically-stimulated DA
release in striatum, observed more marked increases in signal amplitude
than time course (T50) after systemic
administration of nomifensine and cocaine, but the opposite
relationship with GBR 12909 and mazindol. In any case, our results
emphasize that increases in DA clearance rate may occur in response to
DAT inhibitors.
There are several mechanisms that could contribute to the different
results with the two groups of DAT inhibitors. First, the mechanisms by
which the two groups inhibit DAT activity may not be identical. Whether
all of the drugs tested are competitive inhibitors of DAT is unclear.
However, most evidence suggests that they are (see Xu and Reith, 1997
).
For example, mazindol, GBR 12935, cocaine, and CFT all bind to the same
single site in mouse striatum (Reith and Selmeci, 1992
). Likewise,
nomifensine and cocaine competitively inhibit uptake of
stimulation-evoked DA in striatal slices (Jones et al., 1995a
).
However, using rotating disk electrode voltammetry and kinetic modeling
to measure DA uptake in in vitro rat striatal suspensions, Meiergerd
and Schenk (1994)
found that cocaine is competitive with GBR 12909 and
benztropine, but not with nomifensine or mazindol. A second possibility
relates to differences in the abilities of the two drug groups to
affect reverse transport of DAT. Eshleman et al. (1994)
found a
similar grouping of drugs: nomifensine, mazindol, GBR 12935, and
benztropine all inhibited spontaneous release of DA via reversal of DAT
expressed in COS-7 cells, whereas drugs with abuse potential either had no effect (cocaine and CFT) or enhanced (amphetamine) DA release. Although our method factors out any direct contribution of endogenous DA to the clearance measurement, different endogenous DA concentrations could indirectly impact clearance by altering DAT activity. The rank-order based on the magnitude of the increased extracellular DA
concentration observed in striatum of freely-moving rats is amphetamine
(5 mg/kg)
cocaine (30 mg/kg) > nomifensine (10 mg/kg) (Kuczenski
and Segal, 1992
). However, in chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, the
relationship between nomifensine and cocaine is reversed (Church et
al., 1987
). A third possibility relates to the fact that nomifensine,
GBR 12909, and benztropine have 20- to 200-fold lower affinities for
the serotonin transporter than for DAT (mazindol has only a 2-fold
lower affinity; Hyttel, 1982
; Ritz et al., 1987
; Andersen, 1989
). In
contrast, the affinities of cocaine, CFT, and d-amphetamine
are similar for the two transporters (Hyttel, 1982
; Ritz et al., 1987
).
Systemic injection of these latter drugs could increase extracellular
serotonin in the dorsal raphe nucleus, thereby regulating dorsal raphe
neuronal firing. Dorsal raphe neurons regulate DA release in dorsal
striatum (De Deurwaerdère et al., 1998
). Altered extracellular DA
concentrations may, in turn, modulate DAT activity. This mechanism
could also explain our different results with locally applied and
systemically administered cocaine. These possibilities remain to be
tested in future experiments.
| |
Acknowledgment |
|---|
We thank Dr. Shelly Dickinson for help with the statistical analyses.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication November 24, 1998.
Received for publication August 13, 1998.
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DA04216 (N.R.Z.), NS09199, and AG06434 (G.A.G.), and Research Scientist Development Awards DA00174 (N.R.Z.) and MH01245 (G.A.G.). A preliminary report of this work has been presented: Zahniser NR, Larson GA and Gerhardt GA (1996) Soc Neurosci Abstr 22:1577.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Nancy R. Zahniser, Department of Pharmacology C-236, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. Ninth Ave., Denver, CO 80262. E-mail: nancy.zahniser{at}uchsc.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
CFT, (
)2-
-carbomethoxy-3-
-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane or WIN 35,428;
DA, dopamine;
DAT, dopamine transporter;
GBR 12909, 1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-[3-phenylpropyl]piperazine;
KT, transporter affinity;
Vmax, maximal velocity.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-(4-[125I]iodophenyl)tropane-2
-carboxylic acid isopropyl ester.
Mol Pharmacol
47:
779-786[Abstract].
Pharmacological profile of a specific serotonin uptake inhibitor with antidepressant activity.
Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
6:
277-295[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhu, S. Apparsundaram, and L. P. Dwoskin Nicotinic Receptor Activation Increases [3H]Dopamine Uptake and Cell Surface Expression of Dopamine Transporters in Rat Prefrontal Cortex J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2009; 328(3): 931 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Tan and D. Bullock A Dopamine-Acetylcholine Cascade: Simulating Learned and Lesion-Induced Behavior of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2409 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Champagne, P. Chretien, C. W. Stevenson, T. Y. Zhang, A. Gratton, and M. J. Meaney Variations in Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Associated with Individual Differences in Maternal Behavior in the Rat J. Neurosci., April 28, 2004; 24(17): 4113 - 4123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. T. Bello, K. L. Sweigart, J. M. Lakoski, R. Norgren, and A. Hajnal Restricted feeding with scheduled sucrose access results in an upregulation of the rat dopamine transporter Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): R1260 - R1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sabeti, G. A. Gerhardt, and N. R. Zahniser Individual Differences in Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Sensitization in Low and High Cocaine Locomotor-Responding Rats Are Associated with Differential Inhibition of Dopamine Clearance in Nucleus Accumbens J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2003; 305(1): 180 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sabeti, G. A. Gerhardt, and N. R. Zahniser Acute Cocaine Differentially Alters Accumbens and Striatal Dopamine Clearance in Low and High Cocaine Locomotor Responders: Behavioral and Electrochemical Recordings in Freely Moving Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1201 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wu, M. E. A. Reith, M. J. Kuhar, F. I. Carroll, and P. A. Garris Preferential Increases in Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine after Systemic Cocaine Administration Are Caused by Unique Characteristics of Dopamine Neurotransmission J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6338 - 6347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Cragg, C. Nicholson, J. Kume-Kick, L. Tao, and M. E. Rice Dopamine-Mediated Volume Transmission in Midbrain Is Regulated by Distinct Extracellular Geometry and Uptake J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1761 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||