![]() |
|
|
Vol. 288, Issue 3, 1235-1241, March 1999
Instituto de Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary cultures of fetal hepatocytes expressed cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) upon stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or peroxisomal proliferators. This enzyme was active and a good correlation between the mRNA levels, the amount of protein, and the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 was observed. However, when cells were incubated in the presence of indomethacin or the COX-2-specific inhibitor NS398, the amount of COX-2 protein increased 5-fold after activation with LPS and 2-fold after treatment with clofibrate. This up-regulation of COX-2 was not observed at the mRNA level. The mechanism of protein accumulation might involve either a direct stabilization of the enzyme by the inhibitors or the absence of prostaglandins involved in the regulation of its turnover. Among the prostaglandins assayed, only 15-deoxy-Prostaglandin J2 exerted a statistically significant decrease in the COX-2 levels in cells stimulated with LPS or LPS plus NS398. The accumulation of COX-2 in the presence of inhibitors was also observed in peritoneal macrophages treated under identical conditions. These results indicate that COX-2 protein accumulates after enzyme inhibition, and because removal of the inhibitors restored the enzyme activity, suppression of treatment with reversible COX-2 inhibitors may cause a transient overproduction of prostaglandins.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostaglandin
H synthase, also known as cyclooxygenase (COX) catalyzes the first
rate-limiting step in the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes
from arachidonic acid (Dewitt, 1991
; Xie et al., 1991
). Two COX
isoenzymes have been identified: COX-1, which is constitutively
expressed in a wide variety of tissues and is responsible for the low
prostaglandin synthesis required for cell homeostasis (Dewitt, 1991
;
Pilbeam et al., 1993
; Crofford, 1997
); and COX-2, which is a
highly-inducible enzyme that is expressed in the course of inflammation
or other cellular stresses and accounts for the important synthesis of
prostanoids that occurs in several physiopathological situations such
as endotoxemia, septic shock, and local inflammation of target tissues
(Kujubu et al., 1991
; Feng et al., 1995
; Dewitt, 1997
). In
addition to inflammation, elevated COX-2 expression has been associated
with cell growth regulation and carcinogenesis (Crofford, 1997
).
Indeed, COX-2 behaves as an immediate-early gene inducible by
lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines, growth factors, and the tumor
promoter TPA (Kujubu et al., 1991
; Ryseck et al., 1992
; Herschman et
al., 1995
).
COX-2 is also regulated at the transcription level by a diverse group
of rodent liver tumor promoters known as peroxisomal proliferators
(PPs). PPs cause an increase in the size and number of hepatic
peroxisomes and enhance the expression of enzymes involved in fatty
acid catabolism via activation of PP-activated receptors (PPARs),
members of the steroid receptor superfamily (Green, 1995
; Lee et al.,
1995
). Three subtypes of PPARs have been identified (
,
/
, and
). PPAR
is expressed in liver, gut, kidney, and brown adipose
tissue (Kliewer et al., 1994
; Braissant et al., 1996
), whereas PPAR
is found predominantly in white adipose tissue (Isseman and Green,
1990
). PPAR
is transcriptionally activated by hypolipidaemic
fibrates such as clofibrate, fatty acids, and other ligands (Keller et
al., 1993
; Yu et al., 1995
). Transcriptional regulation by PPARs is
achieved through PPAR-retinoid X receptor heterodimers (where
retinoid X receptor is the receptor for 9-cis-retinoic acid)
which bind to DNA motifs (PPAR response elements) in the promoters of
their target genes (Keller et al., 1993
).
Hepatocytes respond well both in vivo and in vitro to most of the
stimuli that positively regulate COX-2 expression in other cells
(Dewitt, 1991
; Herschman et al., 1995
; Feng et al., 1995
; Williams and
DuBois, 1996
). However, adult hepatocytes failed to express COX-2
regardless of the stimuli used and only Kupffer cells and immortalized
mouse liver cells retain the ability to induce COX-2 (Zhang et al.,
1995
; Ledwith et al., 1997
; Nanji et al., 1997
).
Results from our group demonstrated that fetal hepatocytes of 21 days
of gestation which exhibit a phenotype distinct from the adult
counterparts respond well to LPS and proinflammatory cytokines (Casado
et al., 1997
). In view of these results, and taking into account that
PPs have growth regulatory activities that are independent of
peroxisome proliferation (Chen et al., 1994
), we have
investigated the effect of LPS and PPs on COX-2 expression and
prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)
synthesis in these hepatocytes. Our data show that COX-2 is expressed
in these cells. However, in the presence of COX inhibitors, the amount
of COX-2 but not the corresponding mRNA levels increased severalfold.
Because these COX-2-specific inhibitors do not inhibit irreversibly the
enzyme, these data indicate that pharmacological treatment with these drugs should consider the increase of COX-2 protein produced under these conditions and that it is catalytically active upon removal of
the inhibitor.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals. Clofibrate, prostaglandins, and LPS from Escherichia coli were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). 15-deoxy-Prostaglandin J2 was purchased from Calbiochem (Band Soden, Germany). Antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Laboratories (Santa Cruz, CA). Tissue culture dishes were obtained from Falcon (Lincoln Park, NJ). Tissue culture media were purchased from Biowhittaker (Walkersville, MD). Cytokines were from Boehringer (Mannheim, Germany). COX inhibitors were purchased from Cayman Chemical Co., Inc. (Ann Arbor, MI). PPs were obtained from Biomol Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Reagents for electrophoresis were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA).
Isolation and Culture of Fetal Hepatocytes.
Hepatocytes from
21-day-old fetuses were prepared from pregnant albino Wistar rats
(300-350 g). Animals were cared for following the Institutional Animal
Care Instructions. Animals were fed on a standard laboratory diet and
sacrificed between 09:00 and 10:00 h. Gestational age was assessed by
standard criteria and fetuses were delivered by Caesarean section
(Martín-Sanz et al., 1989
). A suspension of fetal or neonatal
hepatocytes was prepared by a nonperfusion collagenase dispersion
method that involved incubation (3 g/flask) of chopped fetal liver for
30 min at 37°C with 15 ml of Ca2+-free
Krebs-bicarbonate buffer containing 0.5 mM EGTA, under continuous gassing with a carbogen mixture
(O2/CO2, 19:1;
Martín-Sanz et al., 1989
). The cell suspension was centrifuged
(35g for 2 min) and the cell pellet was resuspended and
incubated for 60 min with this medium containing 2.5 mM
CaCl2 and 0.5 mg/ml collagenase A (Boehringer
Mannheim). At the end of the incubation period, the cells were
centrifuged at 50g for 5 min and the cell pellet was
resuspended and progressively filtered through nylon membranes of
500-µm, 100-µm and 50-µm mesh. Cell viability was assessed by
trypan blue exclusion and was always higher than 90%. The hepatocyte suspension was washed twice with sterile Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and then kept in this medium supplemented with 50 µg/ml gentamicin, penicillin G, and streptomycin, respectively. Fetal
hepatocytes were plated at 2 to 3 × 106
cells in 6-cm tissue culture dishes containing 2.5 ml of DMEM supplemented with 10% of heat-inactivated fetal calf serum
(FCS). Four hours after seeding the cells, the medium was
aspirated and the plates were washed twice with PBS to remove the
nonadherent cells. The hepatocytes were maintained in 2 ml of phenol
red-free DMEM supplemented with 2% of heat-inactivated FCS . The
amount of fetal hepatocytes expressing
-fetoprotein was evaluated by immunocytochemistry and was higher than 90%.
Preparation of Peritoneal Macrophages.
Adult male rats were
maintained free of pathogens and bred in our colony. Resident
peritoneal macrophages were prepared following a previous protocol
(Casado et al., 1997
). Briefly, light ether-anesthetized rats (4-6
animals) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and injected i.p. with
15 ml of sterile RPMI 1640 medium. The peritoneal fluid was carefully
aspirated to avoid hemorrhage and kept at 4°C to prevent the adhesion
of the macrophages to the plastic. After centrifugation at
200g for 10 min at 4°C, the cell pellet was washed twice
with 45 ml of ice-cold PBS. Cells were seeded at 2 × 106 (6-cm dishes) with RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% of heat-inactivated FCS. After incubation for
1 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, nonadherent cells
were removed by extensive washing with PBS. Cells were maintained in 2 ml of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% of heat-inactivated FCS.
Preparation of Microsomal Fractions.
Cells were washed twice
with ice-cold PBS and homogenized with 1 ml of ice-cold extraction
buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 2 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) followed
by three cycles of 15 s of sonication at 4°C. The homogenates
were centrifuged at 10,000g for 15 min at 4°C. The
resulting supernatants were centrifuged at 105,000g for
1 h at 4°C and the microsomal pellets were resuspended in buffer
(20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5% Nonidet
P-40). An aliquot was removed for protein determination (Bio-Rad
protein reagent). Microsomes were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer
(Laemmli, 1970
) and microsomal protein (20 µg) was loaded to a 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by Western blotting
analysis (see below).
RNA Extraction and Analysis.
Total RNA (3-4
×106 cells) was extracted following the
guanidinium thiocyanate method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987
). After electrophoresis in a 0.9% agarose gel containing 2% formaldehyde the
RNA was transferred to a Nytran membrane (NY 13-N; Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) with 10× standard saline citrate (SSC; 10×
SSC is 1.5 M NaCl/0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.4). The membrane was
prehybridized and the level of COX-2 mRNA was determined by the
corresponding full length cDNA as probe (Fletcher et al., 1992
),
labeled with [
-32P]dCTP with the Rediprime
labeling kit (Amersham, Bucks, UK). The membrane was washed with
0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 10 min and twice at
42°C for 30 min. Quantification of the radioactive emission was
performed in a Fuji BAS1000 detector (Kanagawa, Japan), avoiding
saturation of the bands, and followed by exposure to X-ray film
(Hyperfilm; Amersham). Normalization of the blots for RNA lane charge
was performed by the hybridization with a probe specific for the
18S ribosomal RNA inserted into a PBR322 plasmid and labeled
by nick translation.
Western Blot Analysis. The amount of COX-2 was determined in enriched microsomal preparations or in total cell extracts in the case of peritoneal macrophages. After determining the protein content, samples were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer and equal amounts of microsomal or soluble cell extract protein were size-fractionated in a 10% acrylamide gel, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Amersham), and after blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk incubated with anti-COX-2 (1:1000) antibody from Santa Cruz Laboratories.
Determination of Metabolites. PGE2 levels were determined in the culture medium with a specific enzyme immunoassay system and following the indications of the manufacturer (Amersham).
Data Analysis. The number of experiments is indicated in the corresponding figure. Statistical differences (P < .05) between mean values were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Student's t test.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fetal Hepatocytes Express COX-2 in Response to LPS: Modulation by
COX Inhibitors.
Primary cultures of hepatocytes prepared from
fetal liver (21 days of gestation) release PGE2
into the medium, reflecting the presence of a constitutive COX activity
in these cells. When fetal hepatocytes were incubated with LPS, an
important expression of COX-2 was observed as evidenced by the increase
in PGE2 synthesis (Fig.
1A) and the detection of both the
immunoreactive protein in microsomal extracts (Western blot analysis)
and the corresponding mRNA (Northern blot analysis) (Fig. 1B). When
control or LPS-treated cells were incubated with indomethacin, a
general COX inhibitor, or with the COX-2-specific inhibitor NS398
(Salvemini et al., 1995
; Smith et al., 1996
), the release of
PGE2 behaved differently depending on the
stimulation of the hepatocytes (Table 1).
Indomethacin inhibited more than 95% of the basal and LPS-induced
activities. However, NS398 failed to inhibit PGE2
production in unstimulated cells but blocked the synthesis in
LPS-activated hepatocytes.
|
|
ligand
15-deoxy-PGJ2 (all assayed 10 µM). Only
15-deoxy-PGJ2 promoted a 25 and 30% decrease in
the amount of COX-2 protein after LPS or LPS plus NS398 challenge, respectively (Table 2).
|
|
|
PPAR
Ligands Induce COX-2 Expression and Antagonize with LPS in
this Process.
Hepatocytes express PPAR
that binds to the
corresponding PPAR response elements sequence in the promoter regions
of several genes (Braissant et al., 1996
; Dowell et al., 1997
). It has
been described that PPs induce COX-2 expression in immortalized mouse liver cells (Ledwith et al., 1997
). We analyzed the effect of clofibrate, a hypolipidemic compound, on COX-2 expression in our model
of fetal hepatocytes. As Fig 4 shows,
clofibrate increased COX-2 protein (at 24 h) and mRNA (at 6 h) in a dose-dependent manner. However, clofibrate assayed at
concentrations higher than 700 µM resulted toxic for these cells
(more than 40% of lactate dehydrogenase released to the medium at 1 mM
clofibrate). The expression of COX-2 protein by clofibrate was always
lower than that elicited by LPS (58% with respect to LPS).
|
ligands might induce COX-2, as
well as the effect of NS398 on the protein levels, experiments were
performed in which the amount of protein and the synthesis of
PGE2 were measured. As Fig.
5 shows, clofibrate was more potent than
the PPs, Wy14643, and 5,8,11,14-eicosatetrayonic acid (ETYA) inducing
COX-2 and PGE2 release. Moreover, in cells
treated with clofibrate, and to a lower extent with Wy14643, the
presence of NS398 enhanced COX-2 protein levels. However, as Fig. 5C
shows, antagonism was observed between clofibrate and LPS in the
expression of COX-2. The accumulation of COX-2 observed after treatment
of fetal hepatocytes with LPS or clofibrate and the inhibitor NS398 was
further investigated to assess the functionality of the enzyme. To do
this, cells were challenged for 20 h with LPS or clofibrate in the
absence or presence of NS398. After extensive washing of the cell
cultures to remove the inhibitor, the release of
PGE2 was determined after culture in the absence
of effectors for an additional 4 h. As Fig.
6 shows, the enzyme accumulated in cells treated with NS398 and either LPS or clofibrate was functional, and a
3.7- and 2.4-fold increase in PGE2 synthesis was
measured with each activator.
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this work we have analyzed the ability of fetal hepatocytes to
express COX-2 in response to a proinflammatory stimuli such as LPS and
to several PPs, as well as the effect of COX inhibitors on both COX-2
mRNA and protein levels in activated cells. Interestingly, fetal
hepatocytes release moderate amounts of PGE2
through COX-1 as deduced by pharmacological and biochemical criteria.
Upon activation with LPS or PPs these cells express important levels of
COX-2. Taken together, these results confirm COX-1 and COX-2 as the
main prostaglandin synthesizing enzyme in control and LPS-stimulated hepatocytes, respectively. Moreover, LPS is more efficient than PPs
inducing COX-2, and among the latter, clofibrate is the most potent PP
expressing COX-2. However, ETYA and, to a lesser extent, Wy14643 are
good activators of PPAR
, at least 5- an 3-fold more effective than
clofibrate, respectively, when analyzed on a
coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay (Krey et al., 1997
).
Therefore, it is possible that in addition to PPAR
activation,
clofibrate exerts other effects that favor COX-2 expression in these
cells. Previous reports suggested that the expression of COX-2 elicited
by clofibrate and other PPs yielded a virtually inactive enzyme
(Ledwith et al., 1997
). However, our results clearly show that the
enzyme is functional if the concentration of PP used does not affect cell viability. Also, it is worth mentioning the antagonism between LPS
and PPs in terms of COX-2 induction, which suggests the involvement of
distinct pathways in the activation process. Analysis of this antagonism might offer new possibilities to manipulate
pharmacologically the transcriptional control of this enzyme.
The accumulation of COX-2 protein observed when fetal hepatocytes are
treated with COX inhibitors was unexpected and because of the magnitude
of the effect, this result could be of considerable pharmacological
interest, especially when reversible COX inhibitors are used. Moreover,
not only in fetal hepatocytes, but also in macrophages, the inhibitors
increased COX-2 protein levels, although the effect was quantitatively
less important. The inducibility of COX-2 in macrophages has been
well characterized (Yamada et al., 1997
) and in agreement with our
data, a moderate increase in the protein, but without changes at the
mRNA level was evidenced after COX-2 inhibition with indomethacin in
the macrophage cell line J774 (Pang and Hoult, 1996
).
The mechanism by which indomethacin and NS398 favor COX-2 accumulation
was partially analyzed. The data available indicated that the
inhibitors did not affect COX-2 transcription, but rather acted at a
post-translational level, either through stabilizing effects on the
protein structure, or through the decrease in the synthesis of
prostaglandins that favor COX-2 degradation or both. Among the
metabolites assayed, only incubation of fetal hepatocytes with
15-deoxy-PGJ2 resulted in a low but significant
decrease in the amount of COX-2 protein, suggesting that protein
stabilization by the inhibitors was the main contributor to COX-2
accumulation. It should be mentioned that a destabilizing effect of
prostaglandins (mainly by PGE2) on COX-2 protein
has been described in macrophages by other groups (Pang and Hoult,
1996
).
In addition to the effects of COX inhibitors on protein levels, it has
been described that high concentrations of indomethacin and other
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, although they completely
inhibited prostaglandin synthesis, induced COX-2 expression exhibiting
a similar time course and dose response as that elicited by PPs
(Ledwith et al., 1997
; Lehman et al., 1997
). This is because these drugs are potent activators of both PPAR
and PPAR
,
therefore mimicking most of the effects of the PPs. However, this is
not the mechanism of action observed in our experimental system because neither inhibitor by itself induced COX-2, and the amount of COX-2 mRNA
in activated cells was not increased by these drugs, indicating that at
the concentrations used they act on the protein stability.
Regarding the effects of prostaglandins on liver function, it has been
reported that exogenous PGE2 stimulated
hepatocyte growth factor production by several cells and that this is
an important cytokine for hepatocyte growth (Bamba et al.,
1998
). Indeed, indomethacin and other COX inhibitors decreased
the release of hepatocyte growth factor, and together with other data,
this suggests that prostaglandins are important regulators of normal hepatocyte development (Bamba et al., 1998
). Also, interleukin-6, an
important cytokine involved in the acute phase response and in liver
regeneration is elevated by PGE2 (Hinson et al.,
1996
).
With respect to COX-2 inducibility in the hepatocyte, previous work
indicated that these cells, at least from adult animals, are extremely
resistant to induce COX-2 in response to a wide array of treatments
(Johnston and Kroening, 1996
). Only in simian virus
40-transformed hepatocytes or in immortalized liver cells from adult
mice has it been possible to observe COX-2 expression in response to
phorbol esters, PPs, and proinflammatory factors (Ledwith et al., 1997
;
Yu et al., 1998
).
In conclusion, it is presumed that COX-2 inhibitors favor a
conformational change in the protein that substantially alters its
normal turnover and differences probably exist among distinct cell
types. This is of pharmacological relevance because the accumulated enzyme is fully active once the concentration of the inhibitor decreases. In this regard, the design and use of irreversible inhibitors of COX-2 might benefit a better control on COX activity. The
use of aspirin-like molecules such as
o-(acetoxyphenyl)hept-2-ynyl sulfide, which is 60-fold more
reactive than aspirin for COX-2 (Kalgutkar et al., 1998
) and that
inactivate irreversibly the enzyme are the likely candidates to avoid
this increased COX-2 activity.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 23, 1998.
Received for publication July 16, 1998.
1 This work was supported by Grants 95/0966 and 98/0220 from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Spain
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Paloma Martín-Sanz, Instituto de Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
COX, Cyclooxygenase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ETYA, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetrayonic acid; PP, peroxisome proliferator; PPAR, peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor; PG, prostaglandin; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; SSC, standard saline citrate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
, and
in the adult rat.
Endocrinology
137:
354-366[Abstract].
conformational changes.
J Biol Chem
272:
2013-2020
, and lipopolysaccharide.
J Clin Invest
95:
1669-1675.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O Nunez, A Fernandez-Martinez, P L Majano, A Apolinario, M Gomez-Gonzalo, I Benedicto, M Lopez-Cabrera, L Bosca, G Clemente, C Garcia-Monzon, et al. Increased intrahepatic cyclooxygenase 2, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression is associated with progressive liver disease in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: role of viral core and NS5A proteins Gut, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 1665 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lanza-Jacoby, A. P. Dicker, S. Miller, F. E. Rosato, J. T. Flynn, S. N. Lavorgna, and R. Burd Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-dependent effects of the inhibitor SC236 when combined with ionizing radiation in mammary tumor cells derived from HER-2/neu mice Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2004; 3(4): 417 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Han, H. Inoue, L. C. Flowers, and N. Sidell Control of COX-2 Gene Expression through Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} in Human Cervical Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 9(12): 4627 - 4635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mendez and M. C. LaPointe PPAR{gamma} Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2, PGE2 Synthase, and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Cardiac Myocytes Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 844 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Moon and J. J. Pestka Vomitoxin-Induced Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Expression in Macrophages Mediated by Activation of ERK and p38 but Not JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2002; 69(2): 373 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Janabi Selective Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,1412,14-prostaglandin J2 in Activated Human Astrocytes, But Not in Human Brain Macrophages J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4747 - 4755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Guyton, R. Bond, C. Reilly, G. Gilkeson, P. Halushka, and J. Cook Differential effects of 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 and a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} agonist on macrophage activation J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2001; 69(4): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Callejas, M Casado, L Bosca, and P Martin-Sanz Requirement of nuclear factor kappaB for the constitutive expression of nitric oxide synthase-2 and cyclooxygenase-2 in rat trophoblasts J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1999; 112(18): 3147 - 3155. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Inoue, T. Tanabe, and K. Umesono Feedback Control of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression through PPARgamma J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 28028 - 28032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Faour, Y. He, Q. W. He, M. de Ladurantaye, M. Quintero, A. Mancini, and J. A. Di Battista Prostaglandin E2 Regulates the Level and Stability of Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA through Activation of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in Interleukin-1beta -treated Human Synovial Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2001; 276(34): 31720 - 31731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||