![]() |
|
|
Vol. 288, Issue 2, 866-878, February 1999
The Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, and Psychiatry Research Service, Veterans Administration Chicago Health Care System (West Side Division), Chicago, Illinois
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This investigation examined the effects of acute and chronic ethanol exposure and its withdrawal on the cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and the activator protein-1 (AP-1) gene transcription factors in the rat brain. The anxiogenic effects of ethanol withdrawal after acute or protracted ethanol treatment of rats were measured by the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test. It was observed that ethanol withdrawal after acute ethanol treatment has no effect on open-arm activity (percent of open-arm entries and the mean percent of time spent on the open arms) of rats on the EPM test. On the other hand, the time course studies of the development of anxiety during ethanol withdrawal (0, 12, 24, and 72 h) after 15 days of ethanol treatment indicate that peak anxiety (significant decrease in open-arm activity) occurred at 24 h of ethanol withdrawal in rats. It was observed that acute ethanol treatment and its withdrawal (24 h) had no effect on CRE- or AP-1 DNA-binding activities in the rat cortex as determined by the electrophoretic gel-mobility shift assay. It was also found that chronic ethanol treatment and its withdrawal (24 h) had no effect on AP-1 DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex. Investigation of the time course studies of changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity during ethanol withdrawal (0, 12, 24, and 72 h) after 15 days of ethanol treatment indicated that the peak reduction of CRE-DNA-binding activity occurred at 24 h of ethanol withdrawal. The changes in the immunolabeling of the CREB-related target, that is, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), in the rat cortex during chronic ethanol treatment and its withdrawal (24 h) were examined using western blotting. It was found that 24 h but not 0 h of ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol treatment caused a significant decrease in the immunolabeling of BDNF in the rat cortex. Fluoxetine (alone) treatment of rats for 1 or 15 days had no effect on open-arm activity and cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity. However, when fluoxetine was administered concurrently with ethanol treatment for 15 days, it caused a reversal of the anxiogenic effects of ethanol withdrawal and antagonized the down-regulation of CRE-DNA-binding activity and of the decrease in immunolabeling of BDNF in the cortices of ethanol-withdrawn rats. On the other hand, acute fluoxetine treatment produced normalization of the reduction of cortical CRE-DNA binding in ethanol-withdrawn rats (24 h) but did not reach the level of significance compared with normal control rats. Acute fluoxetine treatment had no effect on anxiety in ethanol-withdrawn rats. Taken together, these results suggest the possibility that decreased CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex may be associated with the molecular mechanisms of ethanol dependence (i.e., ethanol withdrawal-related anxiety).
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cessation
of chronic ethanol consumption is often accompanied by signs and
symptoms characteristic of ethanol withdrawal syndromes (Koob and
Bloom, 1988
; Harris and Buck, 1990
). Anxiety is a common early symptom
of ethanol withdrawal and is considered an important factor in the
continued use of alcohol by alcoholics because this relieves the
symptoms of ethanol withdrawal (Roelofs, 1985
; Wilson, 1988
; Kushner et
al., 1990
). Study of the cellular mechanisms associated with the
development of anxiety during ethanol withdrawal after protracted
ethanol exposure is important to provide a basis for developing better
drugs to treat ethanol withdrawal-related anxiety.
The cellular actions of various neurotransmitters [serotonin (5-HT),
norepinephrine, dopamine, acetylcholine] in the brain are mediated
through the activation of adenylate cyclase, which causes the formation
of the intracellular second messenger cAMP and subsequently leads to
the activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) (Gilman, 1989
).
The activation of PKA releases the catalytic subunits of PKA, which
migrate to the nucleus and phosphorylate the cAMP-responsive element
binding protein (CREB) gene transcription factor, which then regulates
the expression of cAMP-inducible genes (Gonzales et al., 1989
; Gonzales
and Montminy, 1989
; Hunter and Michael, 1992
; Meyer and Habener, 1993
).
Alterations in the various steps of the cAMP signal transduction
pathway in the brain and in other cell systems during ethanol tolerance
and dependence have been demonstrated by several investigators
(Mochly-Rosen et al., 1988
; Valverius et al., 1989
; Hoffman and
Tabakoff, 1990
; Wand and Levine, 1991
; Coe et al., 1996
).
Several earlier studies have demonstrated that chronic ethanol
treatment decreases the activity of adenylate cyclase and decreases stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein
(GS) and increases inhibitory guanine
nucleotide-binding protein (Gi) protein
expression and function in the rodent brain (Valverius et al., 1989
;
Hoffman and Tabakoff, 1990
; Wand and Levine, 1991
). It has also been
shown that PKA-mediated phosphorylation is decreased in the brain of chronic ethanol-treated rats compared with controls (Ruis et al., 1988
). Because various components (neurotransmitter receptors, G
proteins, adenylate cyclase, PKA) of the cAMP signal transduction cascade are decreased in the rodent brain during ethanol dependence (Shen et al., 1983
; Ruis et al., 1988
; Valverius et al., 1989
; Hoffman
and Tabakoff, 1990
; Wand and Levine, 1991
), it is possible that the
function of the CREB gene transcription factor may also be altered
during ethanol dependence. Furthermore, the expression of the
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been shown to be regulated
by the CREB gene transcription factor (Condorelli et al., 1994
; Duman
et al., 1995
, 1997
). This suggests that alterations in CRE-DNA-binding
activity might modulate the expression of BDNF in the rat brain during
ethanol dependence.
Activator protein-1 (AP-1) is another gene transcription factor that
has been shown to recognize a specific DNA sequence (TGACTCA) in the
promoter region of several genes (Hai and Curran, 1991
; Hughes and
Dragunow, 1995
). The immediate-early genes, c-fos and c-jun, encode proteins that are known to form homodimeric or
heterodimeric protein complexes (Sonnenberg et al., 1989
; Kobierski et
al., 1991
; Hughes and Dragunow, 1995
). These protein complexes
recognize the AP-1 DNA-binding elements that regulate the transcription of genes containing this DNA element (Sonnenberg et al., 1989
; Hughes
and Dragunow, 1995
). Although changes in CRE- and AP-1 DNA-binding
activities have been demonstrated in various brain structures of rats
during morphine or cocaine treatment (Hope et al., 1992
; Nestler, 1992
;
Maldonado et al., 1996
; Pich et al., 1997
), their roles in ethanol
dependence are not fully understood. Recently, it was shown that AP-1
DNA-binding activity is increased in brain of ethanol-withdrawn rats
after chronic ethanol inhalation (Beckmann et al., 1997
). Whether acute
or chronic ethanol treatment produces similar or dissimilar effects on
AP-1 DNA-binding activity in the rat brain, however, is unknown.
5-HT neurotransmission has been shown to play an important role in
anxiety (Eison and Eison, 1994
; Graeff et al., 1996
), and 5-HT uptake
blockers (e.g., fluoxetine) are useful in the treatment of anxiety and
depression in alcoholics undergoing detoxification (LeJoyeau, 1996
;
Pettinati, 1996
). It has been shown that long-term fluoxetine treatment
increases the function of CREB and the expression of BDNF in the rat
hippocampus (Nibuya et al., 1996
). These observations raise the
possibility that although the initial action of fluoxetine could be
related to increases in 5-HT levels and to alterations in 5-HT receptor
subtypes (Wong et al., 1995
), the CREB signaling cascade could also be
involved in the anxiolytic or the antidepressive actions of fluoxetine.
The objectives of the present study were to elucidate (1) the effects of acute and chronic ethanol treatment and its withdrawal on the CRE- and AP-1 DNA-binding activities in the rat cortex, (2) whether changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity are associated with changes in CREB targets (e.g., BDNF, in the rat cortex during ethanol treatment and its withdrawal), (3) whether ethanol withdrawal after acute or protracted ethanol treatment is associated with the development of anxiogenic behaviors in rats, (4) whether the time course of the development of anxiogenic behaviors during ethanol withdrawal after protracted ethanol intake is associated with the time course of changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex, and (5) the effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine treatment on anxiogenic behaviors and on the cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity in ethanol-withdrawn rats after 15 days of ethanol intake.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Ethanol Administration
Virus-free male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 225 to 250 g
were used in all experiments. Ethanol administration to rats was performed by oral ethanol feeding as described previously (Pandey, 1996
; Pandey et al., 1996
). After a brief acclimation period, rats were
individually housed and offered 100 ml of the Lieber-DeCarli control
diet (Lieber-DeCarli Diet 82; Bioserve, Inc., Frenchtown, NJ) as their
sole source of food or fluid. On the next day, rats were randomly
selected for the acute or the chronic study. All animals were pair-fed
and were weighed twice a week. Fresh diet was provided between 5:00 and
6:00 PM every night. All animal procedures were in accordance with the
National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals" and were approved by the Animal Care Committee of
the University of Illinois at Chicago and VA Chicago Health Care System
(West Side Division) Chicago.
For the acute ethanol study, one group of rats received the control
liquid diet and a second group of rats was gradually introduced to the
ethanol diet by receiving a liquid diet containing 4.5% (v/v) ethanol
on the first day, 7.5% (v/v) ethanol on the second day, and 9% (v/v)
ethanol on the third day. Ethanol-treated rats were withdrawn from
ethanol for 0, 14, and 24 h. All rats were tested for anxiogenic
behaviors using the elevated plus-maze test (EPM) (see later EPM
discussion). All of these rats were decapitated, and their brains were
collected. The cerebral cortices were dissected onto an ice-chilled
plate and frozen at
80°C until used for measurement of the CRE- and
the AP-1 DNA-binding activities.
For the chronic ethanol study, one group of rats were also introduced
gradually to ethanol (see previous acute study discussion) but were
maintained on the ethanol-containing (9% v/v) Lieber-DeCarli liquid
isocaloric diet ad libitum for 15 days (ethanol-fed group). Another
group of rats received the control liquid diet for 15 days (pair-fed
control group). For the time course studies, ethanol-treated rats were
withdrawn for 0, 12, 24, and 72 h. For the chronic fluoxetine studies, the control liquid diet-fed and the ethanol-fed groups also
received fluoxetine (5 mg/kg/day i.p.) or vehicle treatment for 15 days. Thus, there were five groups of rats in the chronic ethanol and
chronic fluoxetine study: (1) control liquid diet-fed plus vehicle, (2)
ethanol-fed (0-h withdrawal), (3) ethanol-withdrawn (24 h after 15 days
of ethanol intake) plus vehicle, (4) liquid diet-fed plus chronic
fluoxetine-treated (15 days of i.p. 5 mg/kg/day), and (5)
ethanol-withdrawn (24 h after 15 days of ethanol intake) plus chronic
fluoxetine-treated. All five rat groups were tested for anxiogenic
behaviors using the EPM. In the fluoxetine-treated rats, the behavioral
measurements were performed 24 h after the fluoxetine injection on
the 15th day. For the acute fluoxetine studies, control liquid diet-fed
and ethanol-withdrawn rats (24 h) received a single injection of
fluoxetine (5 mg/kg i.p.) just 1 h before the EPM. After
behavioral measurements, the rats were decapitated and their brains
were collected. The cerebral cortices were dissected and frozen at
80°C until used for measurement of CRE- and AP-1 DNA-binding
activities and for the immunolabeling of BDNF.
Measurement of Anxiogenic Behaviors by EPM
The EPM has been used frequently to demonstrate the anxiogenic
behaviors occurring in rats during ethanol withdrawal after chronic
ethanol treatment (Baldwin et al., 1991
; Rassnick et al., 1993
). The
elevated plus-maze is constructed of white Plexiglas and black metal
and consists of two open arms and two closed arms arranged directly
opposite each other and interconnected to a central platform (Lafayette
Instrument Company, IN). The test procedure was the same as that
described by other investigators (Baldwin et al., 1991
; Rassnick et
al., 1993
; Wallis et al., 1993
). Each rat was taken to the test room
and allowed a 5-min pretest habituation period before the EPM was
performed. After the habituation period, the test rat was placed gently
on the central platform facing toward an open arm. The rat was observed
for a 5-min test period, and the number of entries made onto each type
of arm (open versus closed) and the time spent on each type of arm were
recorded. The EPM test results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M.
of the percent of open-arm entries and the mean percent of time spent on the open arms. Anxiogenic behaviors are defined as the decrease in
the percent of time spent exploring the open arms as well as in the
percent of open-arm entries into the EPM.
Determination of CRE- and AP-1 DNA-Binding Activities by Electrophoretic Gel-Mobility Shift Assay
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts.
Nuclear extracts from the
cortical area were prepared according to the methods of Ishige et al.
(1996)
. Tissues were homogenized in 5.0 ml of buffer I [10 mM
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin). The homogenates were centrifuged at
100,000g for 30 min. The resulting pellet was
resuspended in buffer II [20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.84 M NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.4 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50% glycerol, protease
inhibitors as in buffer I). After 15 min of incubation on ice with
frequent agitation, nuclear extracts were collected by centrifugation
at 20,000g for 15 min. The protein content of the
nuclear extracts was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (1951)
.
Preparation of DNA Probes.
Commercially available
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) oligonucleotides carrying regulatory
elements of the CRE sequence (5'-GATTGGCTGACGTCA GAGAGAGCT-3') and of
the AP-1 sequence (5'-CTAGTGATGAGTCAGC CGGATC-3') were used. The probes
were end-labeled with
-32P-ATP using T4 polynucleotide
kinase according to the manufacturer's methods (U.S. Biochemical,
Cleveland, OH).
Gel-Mobility DNA Binding Assay.
Binding reactions were
carried out by incubating 10 µg (for CREB) and 5 µg (for AP-1) of
the nuclear extract with 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) and 6 µg of bovine
serum albumin in a reaction mixture (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1 mM DTT, 0.3 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM ethylene glycol bis(
-aminoethyl
ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid, 80 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.2 mM PMSF) for 15 min at room
temperature. Approximately 40,000 dpm of 32P-labeled CRE
oligonucleotide was added, and the incubation was continued for an
additional 30 min. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 4.0%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel in a buffer containing 25 mM
Tris-borate (pH 8.2) and 0.5 mM EDTA. The gel was dried and
autoradiographed with intensifying Kodak film (Kodak, USA) at
80°C.
The absorbance of the bands of the DNA-protein complex on the
autoradiogram was measured using the Loats Image Analysis System. The
results are expressed as a percent of the control value.
TG substitution in the CRE-binding domain) and
mutated AP-1 oligonucleotide (CA
TG substitution in the AP-1-binding
domain) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
Determination of Immunolabeling of BDNF in Rat Cortex by Western Blotting
Cerebral cortices were homogenized in 1.5 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1.0% IGEPAL,
0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and various protease inhibitors
(10 µg/ml PMSF, 54 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µl/ml of 100 mM sodium
orthovanadate). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant, which is the total
cell lysates, was saved and used for western blotting. Protein samples
(60 µg) from the cortices were separated out by SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis using a 12% (w/v) acrylamide resolving gel and a
4.5% (w/v) acrylamide stacking gel. The protein was then
electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose enhanced
chemiluminescence membrane using a transfer buffer (25 mM Tris base,
192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol, pH 8.4). Nonspecific binding sites
were blocked using 10% nonfat milk in PBS containing 1.0% Tween 20 for 30 min at room temperature. The nitrocellulose membrane was then
incubated overnight at 4°C with the BDNF antibody (Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA) and diluted 1:1000 in PBS containing 1.0% Tween 20. After repeated washing (three times for 15 min) in PBS containing 1.0%
Tween 20, the nitrocellulose membrane was incubated with a horseradish
peroxidase-linked secondary anti-rabbit antibody (1:2000) for 4 h.
The nitrocellulose membranes were washed as described above, and the
bound antibody was detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence method
according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham, Arlington
Heights, IL). The blots were stripped at 50°C for 30 min using a
stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 20% SDS, and 62.5 mM
Tris·HCl, pH 6.7) and then incubated with the
-actin antibody and
the secondary anti-mouse antibody according to the procedure described
above. The bands on the autoradiograms were quantified by using the
Loats Image Analysis System. Values were normalized to the
-actin
immunoactivity in each sample and expressed as a percent of the control value.
Statistical Analysis
Differences among groups were evaluated by using analyses of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test where appropriate. Specific subgroup comparisons were performed by using Student's t test. A value of P < .05 is considered significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Body Weight and Chronic Ethanol Intake. In the acute ethanol study, there were no differences in the mean ± S.E.M. body weight (g) among ethanol-fed (272 ± 3.0), ethanol-withdrawn (24 h) (273 ± 3.9), and pair-fed control (279 ± 2.0) rats. Blood ethanol levels were found to be 101 ± 23 mg/100 ml in the acutely ethanol-fed rats. In the chronic studies, all rats gained weight during the 15 days of ethanol treatment, and there were no significant differences in mean ± S.E.M. body weight (g) among ethanol-fed (297 ± 3.7), ethanol-withdrawn (292 ± 3.9), pair-fed control (280 ± 4.7), and fluoxetine-treated groups [ethanol-withdrawn plus fluoxetine, 290 ± 6.5; fluoxetine (alone)-treated, 290 ± 10.0]. Blood ethanol levels were found to be 183 ± 19 mg/100 ml in the chronically ethanol-fed rats. The blood ethanol level after 24 h of withdrawal in the ethanol-fed group was 0 mg/100 ml. We also measured the daily ethanol intake of the various chronically ethanol-fed rat groups and found that the mean ethanol intake (g/kg/day) was similar in all rat groups (ethanol-fed, 14.65 ± 0.32; ethanol-withdrawn, 14.94 ± 0.36; ethanol-withdrawn plus fluoxetine, 14.72 ± 0.25). These findings indicate that chronic fluoxetine treatment concurrent with ethanol administration had no effect on the daily intake of ethanol.
Anxiogenic Behaviors in Rats during Ethanol Withdrawal after Acute Ethanol Intake. Rats were treated with ethanol (4.5% v/v, first day; 7.5% v/v, second day; and 9% v/v, third day) or control liquid diet. Ethanol-treated rats were withdrawn from ethanol for 0, 14, and 24 h. Anxiogenic behaviors in ethanol-withdrawn (0, 14, and 24 h) rats and in pair-fed control rats were measured by EPM. As shown in Fig. 1, ethanol withdrawal after acute ethanol intake had no significant effect on either the open- or closed-arm activities (number of entries and time spent on open or closed arms) of rats into the EPM test. We also observed that acute ethanol treatment and its withdrawal had no significant effect on the total number of arm entries (open plus closed arms) on the EPM (Fig. 1). These results suggest that ethanol withdrawal after acute ethanol treatment does not cause anxiogenic behaviors in rats.
|
Effects of Acute Ethanol Treatment and Its Withdrawal on CRE- and AP-1 DNA-Binding Activities in the Rat Cortex. We characterized CRE-DNA binding by using two methods: (1) incubation of the nuclear extract (10 µg) with CREB antibody (0.76 µg) resulted in the formation of a supershift band in the gel-mobility shift assay, which indicates that the CRE-DNA-binding complex contains CREB protein (Fig. 2a); and (2) a competitive experiment with unlabeled normal CRE oligonucleotide completely blocked the CRE-DNA-binding activity, whereas incubation with mutated CRE oligonucleotides had no effect on CRE-DNA-binding activity (Fig. 2b). In a similar manner, we also characterized AP-1 DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex. The competitive experiments performed with unlabeled normal or mutated AP-1 oligonucleotides indicate that AP-1 DNA binding is attenuated by the unlabeled normal AP-1 oligonucleotide (higher concentrations) but not by the mutated AP-1 oligonucleotide (Fig. 2b).
|
|
Time Course of Development of Anxiogenic Behaviors during Ethanol Withdrawal after 15 Days of Ethanol Intake. We studied the effects of ethanol withdrawal (0, 12, 24, and 72 h) on the anxiogenic behavior (open-arm activity) of rats treated with ethanol for 15 days (Fig. 4). The percent of open-arm entries and the time spent on the open arms and the time spent on the closed arms on the EPM by ethanol-fed rats (0-h withdrawal) are similar to those of the pair-fed control rats. At 12 h of ethanol withdrawal, there was a slight decrease in the percent of open-arm entries and in the time spent on the open arms, and a slight increase in the time spent on the closed arms by the ethanol-withdrawn rats (Fig. 4). It was observed that the percent of open-arm entries was significantly decreased in ethanol-withdrawn rats at 24 and 72 h of withdrawal. The percent of time spent on the open arms was also significantly decreased, and the time spent on the closed arms was also significantly increased at 24 h of withdrawal. It was also observed that although ethanol-withdrawn rats (72 h) made fewer entries onto the open arms compared with pair-fed control rats, the time spent on the open arms by ethanol-withdrawn rats (72 h) was similar to that of pair-fed control and ethanol-fed (0-h withdrawal) rats. The total number of entries on the EPM (closed-arm plus open-arm entries) was significantly lower in 12-, 24-, and 72-h ethanol-withdrawn rats compared with pair-fed control rats (Fig. 4). These results suggest that peak anxiety in rats occurs at 24 h of ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol treatment.
|
Time Course of Changes in CRE-DNA-Binding Activity during Ethanol
Withdrawal after 15 Days of Ethanol Intake.
We examined
CRE-DNA-binding activity in the cortices of chronic ethanol-fed,
ethanol-withdrawn (12, 24, and 72 h), and pair-fed control rats
using the gel-mobility shift assay. The patterns of the DNA-protein
complexes were similar to those reported by other investigators
(Lukasiuk and Kaczmarek, 1994
; Ishige et al., 1996
). As can be seen in
Fig. 5, a and b, there were no
significant changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex
during ethanol consumption, but CRE-DNA-binding activity was slightly
decreased at 12 h yet significantly decreased at 24 h of
ethanol withdrawal compared with pair-fed control rats. Although the
changes observed in cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity at 24 h of
withdrawal approached normal levels after 72 h of ethanol
withdrawal, the levels remained significantly lower compared with
pair-fed control rats (Fig. 5b). These results suggest that peak
reduction in CRE-DNA-binding activity occurred at 24 h of ethanol
withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol exposure.
|
Effects of Protracted Ethanol Treatment and Its Withdrawal on AP-1
DNA-Binding Activity in the Rat Cortex.
To examine whether the
changes in CRE-DNA binding are unique, we determined AP-1 DNA-binding
activity in the cortices of chronic ethanol-fed (0-h withdrawal),
ethanol-withdrawn (24-h withdrawal), and pair-fed control rats using
the gel-mobility shift assay. The patterns of the DNA-protein complex
of AP-1 were similar to those reported by other investigators (Lukasiuk
and Kaczmarek, 1994
; Ishige et al., 1996
). There were no significant
changes in AP-1 DNA-binding activity in the cortices of ethanol-fed or withdrawn (24 h) rats compared with pair-fed control rats (Fig. 6, a and b). These results suggest that
AP-1 DNA-binding activity is not changed and that only CRE-DNA-binding
activity is decreased in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal (24 h) after protracted (15 days) ethanol intake.
|
Effects of Acute and Chronic Fluoxetine Treatment on Anxiogenic Behaviors and on CRE-DNA Binding Activity during Ethanol Withdrawal. We studied the effects of acute (5 mg/kg once i.p.) and chronic (5 mg/kg/day i.p. for 15 days) fluoxetine treatment on the anxiogenic behaviors (Fig. 7) of rats as well as on CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex. It was observed that although acute fluoxetine treatment antagonized the reduction in cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity in ethanol-withdrawn rats, CRE-DNA-binding activity in the cortices of ethanol-withdrawn plus acute fluoxetine-treated rats is lower compared with normal control rats (Fig. 8, a and b). On the other hand, acute fluoxetine treatment had no effect on the reduction of open-arm activity (anxiogenic behaviors) in rats during ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol intake (Fig. 7).
|
|
|
Immunolabeling of BDNF: Effects of Chronic Ethanol and Chronic
Fluoxetine Treatment.
We examined whether (1) decreased
CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal
(24 h) after 15 days of ethanol treatment is associated with a decrease
in the protein expression of BDNF and (2) the blockade of anxiogenic
behaviors by chronic fluoxetine treatment is associated with
normalization of changes in protein levels of BDNF during ethanol
withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake. We used 60 µg of protein
from the cortices of each group [(pair-fed control, ethanol-fed,
ethanol-withdrawn (24 h), ethanol-withdrawn plus fluoxetine-treated,
and fluoxetine (alone)-treated rats] for the immunoblotting of BDNF.
We used antibodies for BDNF and
-actin to demonstrate the
alterations in protein levels of BDNF in the rat cortex during ethanol
treatment and its withdrawal. We used
-actin as a normalizing factor
for the BDNF immunolabeling studies because we have shown that the immunolabeling of
-actin in the rat cortex is not altered by chronic
ethanol treatment and its withdrawal (Pandey, 1996
). Autoradiograms (Fig. 10a) were analyzed by
densitometric analysis, and BDNF values were normalized using the
values for
-actin protein. We observed a significant decrease (40%)
in the immunolabeling of BDNF in the rat cortex at 24 h of ethanol
withdrawal but no significant decrease (20%) at 0 h of ethanol
withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol treatment (Fig. 10b). It was also
observed that chronic fluoxetine (15 days) treatment concurrent with
ethanol treatment significantly blocked the down-regulation of the
immunolabeling of BDNF in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal
(Fig. 10b). These results suggest that decreased CRE-DNA-binding
activity is associated with decreased immunolabeling of the CREB-target
(i.e., BDNF, in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal after chronic
ethanol intake).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The novel findings of the present investigation are that both CRE-DNA-binding activity and immunolabeling of BDNF are decreased in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal (24 h) after protracted ethanol consumption (15 days) and that these changes may be related to the anxiogenic behaviors occurring in rats during ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake.
CRE- and AP-1 DNA-Binding Activities in the Rat Cortex: Effects of
Ethanol Exposure.
Our results indicate that acute or chronic
ethanol treatment has no significant effect on CRE- or AP-1 DNA-binding
activities in the rat cortex, whereas ethanol withdrawal after chronic
ethanol treatment significantly decreased CRE-DNA-binding activity
without modulating AP-1 DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex. It was found that ethanol withdrawal after acute ethanol treatment had no
effect on CRE-or AP-1 DNA-binding activities in the rat cortex. In
contrast, Yang et al. (1996)
reported that acute ethanol treatment significantly increased CRE-DNA-binding activity as well as the phosphorylation of CREB in the rat cerebellum. The differences between
the present study and the studies of Yang et al. (1996)
in the findings
regarding CRE-DNA-binding activity during acute ethanol exposure may be
related to the difference in brain regions (cortex versus cerebellum)
investigated or to the blood ethanol levels attained. Acute i.p.
injection of ethanol (Yang et al., 1996
) produced high blood ethanol
levels (252 ± 26 mg/100 ml), whereas the acute oral ethanol
feeding paradigm (Pandey, 1996
; blood ethanol level 90 ± 12 mg/100 ml) used in the present study produced low blood ethanol levels
(101 ± 23 mg/100 ml). Similar to our results, Yang et al. (1996)
observed that chronic ethanol treatment had no effect on
CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cerebellum. The effect of ethanol
withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake had not been investigated
previously. Our study clearly suggests that CRE-DNA-binding activity is
decreased in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal after chronic
ethanol intake.
CRE-DNA-Binding Activity and Ethanol Withdrawal-Related Anxiety. To establish whether changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity are associated with the development of anxiety during ethanol withdrawal after acute or protracted ethanol intake, we studied the cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity and the anxiogenic behaviors of rats undergoing ethanol withdrawal after acute and chronic ethanol intake. Our findings indicate that ethanol withdrawal after acute ethanol intake did not cause changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex and did not produce any anxiogenic behaviors. An important finding of the present investigation is that the time course of the decrease in cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity is correlated with the time course of the development of anxiogenic behaviors in rats during ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol exposure. The peak anxiety and the peak reduction in cortical CREB activity occurred at 24 h of ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol treatment of rats. These results suggest that there is a temporal correlation between the reduction in cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity and the development of anxiety during ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake.
Acute and long-term fluoxetine (5-HT uptake blocker) treatment normalized partially and fully, respectively, the decrease in CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal after 15 days of ethanol treatment. However, at the behavioral level, long-term but not acute fluoxetine treatment blocked the anxiety during ethanol withdrawal. Decreased CRE-DNA-binding activity during ethanol withdrawal would be expected to cause decreased expression of cAMP-inducible genes. It is possible that the partial normalization of the decrease in CRE-DNA-binding activity by acute fluoxetine treatment may not fully normalize the changes in downstream cAMP-inducible gene expression in ethanol-withdrawn rats and therefore not be able to prevent the development of anxiety during ethanol withdrawal. On the other hand, the reduction in cortical CRE-DNA-binding activity is fully compensated by chronic fluoxetine treatment, thereby normalizing changes in CREB-related targets and relieving anxiety in ethanol-withdrawn rats. Our results, which show a significant reduction in open-arm activity (percent of open-arm entries and the mean percent of time spent on open arms) on the EPM during ethanol withdrawal (24 h) after 15 days of ethanol treatment in rats, are similar to the results reported by other investigators (Baldwin et al., 1991CREB-Targeted BDNF Genes: Effects of Ethanol Exposure and
Fluoxetine Treatment.
BDNF and somatostatin are cAMP-inducible
genes and are regulated by the CREB gene transcription factor (Comb and
Hyman, 1987
; Condorelli et al., 1994
; Duman et al., 1995
, 1997
). It has
been demonstrated that the infusion of an antisense oligonucleotide to
CREB into the rat hippocampus decreases the basal level of BDNF and
blocks the induction of BDNF expression caused by electroconvulsive shock (Duman et al., 1995
). It has also been shown by some (Hughes and
Dragunow, 1995
; Gaiddon et al., 1996
) but not all (Sano et al., 1996
)
investigators that AP-1 DNA-binding activity and BDNF expression may be
interrelated. It is noteworthy that mRNA levels of BDNF and the
immunolabeling of somatostatin in the rat hippocampus are decreased
during ethanol withdrawal after protracted ethanol exposure (Andrade et
al., 1992
; MacLennan et al., 1995
). In our study, we observed that
decreased CRE- but not AP-1 DNA-binding activity is associated with
decreased immunolabeling of BDNF in the rat cortex during ethanol
withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake. Interestingly, when
CRE-DNA-binding activity is normalized by chronic fluoxetine treatment,
the level of BDNF is also normalized in the rat cortex during ethanol
withdrawal. Furthermore, chronic fluoxetine treatment also antagonizes
the anxiogenic effects during ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol
intake. Currently, it is unknown whether BDNF is involved in anxiety,
but the antidepressive properties of BDNF have been demonstrated in
animal models of depression (Siuciak et al., 1996
; Duman et al., 1997
).
Available evidence indicates that BDNF has neuromodulatory and
neurotrophic influences on 5-HT neurons in the brain (Mamounas et al.,
1995
; Eaton and Whittemore, 1996
). Also, chronic but not acute
treatment with fluoxetine increases the expression of BDNF in the rat
hippocampus (Nibuya et al., 1996
). Taken together, these studies
indicate that BDNF and serotonin may modulate each other's functions,
so that the decreased function of both in the rat brain may be
associated with the anxiogenic effects of ethanol withdrawal. Thus,
changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity in the rat cortex undergoing
ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol intake can modulate the
expression of CREB targets (i.e., BDNF). Although these data support a
relationship between CREB and BDNF in the rat cortex during ethanol
withdrawal, they do not establish that the changes in the expression of
BDNF are explicitly due to changes in CREB.
Conclusions.
The data presented here provide the first
evidence that a reduction in CRE-DNA-binding activity may be associated
with behavioral manifestations of ethanol withdrawal after chronic
ethanol intake. CRE-DNA-binding activity and the expression of CREB
targets (i.e., the protein levels of BDNF) are significantly decreased
in the rat cortex during ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol
intake. More importantly, chronic treatment of rats with a
5-HT-uptake blocker (fluoxetine) concurrent with ethanol treatment
significantly blocks changes in CRE-DNA-binding activity and in BDNF
levels in the cortex, as well as antagonizing the development of
anxiogenic behaviors during ethanol withdrawal after chronic ethanol
intake. Recently, using pharmacological and genetic manipulations, it was shown that the cAMP signaling cascade is involved in the behavioral response to ethanol exposure in Drosophila (Moore et al.,
1998
). Our results suggest that the CREB in the brain may be one of the possible molecular loci associated with the anxiogenic effects of
ethanol withdrawal after protracted ethanol intake. CREB has been shown
to be involved in the neuroadaptational mechanisms to chronic exposure
to morphine or cocaine in rodents (Nestler, 1992
; Maldonado et al.,
1996
; Nestler and Aghajanian, 1997
). Thus, it may be possible that CREB
represents a common intracellular neuronal target that might be
associated with the mediation of long-term effects of drugs of abuse in general.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr. George F. Koob (Director, Alcohol Research Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) for stimulating discussions and suggestions in behavioral studies.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 19, 1998.
Received for publication October 30, 1997.
1 This work was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant AA10005 (to S.C.P.).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Subhash C. Pandey, Psychiatry Research Service (M/C 151), Veterans Administration Chicago Health Care System (West Side Division), 820 S. Damen Ave., Chicago IL 60612.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AP-1, activator protein-1; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CREB, cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; DTT, dithiothreitol; CRE, cyclic AMP-response element; EPM, elevated plus-maze test; Gi, inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding protein; Gs, stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; 5-HT, serotonin; PKA, protein kinase A.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Butyrolactone-induced absence-like seizures increase nuclear CRE- and AP-1 DNA binding activity in mouse brain.
Neuropharmacology
35:
45-55[Medline].
s messenger RNA.
Nature (Lond)
333:
848-850[Medline].
subunit protein and phospholipase C isozymes in the rat brain.
J Neurochem
67:
2355-2361[Medline].
and adenylate cyclase activity in LS mice.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
15:
705-710[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. C. Pandey, R. Ugale, H. Zhang, L. Tang, and A. Prakash Brain Chromatin Remodeling: A Novel Mechanism of Alcoholism J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3729 - 3737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Pandey, H. Zhang, R. Ugale, A. Prakash, T. Xu, and K. Misra Effector Immediate-Early Gene Arc in the Amygdala Plays a Critical Role in Alcoholism J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2589 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Pandey, H. Zhang, A. Roy, and K. Misra Central and medial amygdaloid brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling plays a critical role in alcohol-drinking and anxiety-like behaviors. J. Neurosci., August 9, 2006; 26(32): 8320 - 8331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. S. Rani, M. Qiang, and M. K. Ticku Potential Role of cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein in Ethanol-Induced N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor 2B Subunit Gene Transcription in Fetal Mouse Cortical Cells Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 2126 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Medina, T. E. Krahe, and A. S. Ramoa Early Alcohol Exposure Induces Persistent Alteration of Cortical Columnar Organization and Reduced Orientation Selectivity in the Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1317 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nixon and F. T. Crews Temporally Specific Burst in Cell Proliferation Increases Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Protracted Abstinence from Alcohol J. Neurosci., October 27, 2004; 24(43): 9714 - 9722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Kovacs and E. Toldy BASAL AND ISOPROTERENOL-STIMULATED CYCLIC-ADENOSINE MONOPHOSPHATE LEVELS IN MOUSE HIPPOCAMPUS AND LYMPHOCYTES DURING ALCOHOL TOLERANCE AND WITHDRAWAL Alcohol Alcohol., January 1, 2003; 38(1): 11 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Roy, N. Mittal, H. Zhang, and S. C. Pandey Modulation of Cellular Expression of Glucocorticoid Receptor and Glucocorticoid Response Element-DNA Binding in Rat Brain during Alcohol Drinking and Withdrawal J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2002; 301(2): 774 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Pandey, A. Roy, and N. Mittal Effects of Chronic Ethanol Intake and Its Withdrawal on the Expression and Phosphorylation of the CREB Gene Transcription Factor in Rat Cortex J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2001; 296(3): 857 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yamamoto, S. Pohli, N. Durany, H. Ozawa, T. Saito, K. W. Boissl, R. Zochling, P. Riederer, J. Boning, and M. E. Gotz Immunoreactivity of cAMP response element binding protein is not altered in the post-mortem cerebral cortex or cerebellum of alcoholics Alcohol Alcohol., January 1, 2001; 36(1): 70 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||