![]() |
|
|
Vol. 288, Issue 2, 820-826, February 1999
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts (L.P.M., B.L.W.); and Department of Pharmacology, Astra Arcus AB, Preclinical R&D, Södertälje, Sweden (D.M.J., C.W.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Single-unit recording studies were undertaken in chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats to compare the effects on dorsal raphe cell firing of several putative 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)1A receptor antagonists, including WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide), p-MPPI (4-(2-methoxyphenyl)1-[2'-[N-(2''-pyridinyl)-p-iodobenzamido]ethyl]piperazine), and two newly described 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, NDL-249 [(R)-3-(N-propylamino)-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide] and NAD-299 [(R)-3-N,N-dicyclobutylamino-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide]. Consistent with a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist profile, pretreatment with an approximately equimolar (0.02-0.03 µmol/kg) i.v. dose of each compound caused a significant rightward shift in the dose-response curve for 8-OH-DPAT [8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin]. Antagonist potency was clearly highest for NAD-299 and WAY 100635, which caused shifts roughly 3 times greater than those for either p-MPPI or NDL-249 (ED50 for 8-OH-DPAT, 1.3 ± 0.3 µg/kg; after NAD-299, 18.2 ± 1.0 µg/kg; after WAY 100635, 16.9 ± 2.9 µg/kg; after NDL-249, 6.0 ± 1.2 µg/kg; after p-MPPI, 4.7 ± 1.1 µg/kg). In separate studies, each of the antagonists was administered alone in increasing cumulative doses to evaluate whether they possessed intrinsic agonist activity in this system. At doses below 0.01 µmol/kg, none of the drugs altered firing by more than ±20% basal rates. At higher doses (>0.1 µmol/kg), WAY 100635, NDL-249, and NAD-299 caused a dose-dependent suppression of dorsal raphe cell firing (ED50 = 0.6 ± 0.2, 0.7 ± 0.3, and 0.9 ± 0.4 µmol/kg, respectively). However, the ED50 values for inhibition by these drugs were roughly 30 times higher than the doses that antagonized effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Moreover, the inhibition by all three antagonists (but not 8-OH-DPAT) was readily reversed by d-amphetamine (3.2 mg/kg i.v.), a releaser of norepinephrine, suggesting that these effects were likely due to alpha adrenergic receptor blockade rather than to 5-HT1A receptor agonism. Thus, it was concluded that WAY 100635, NAD-299, NDL-249, and p-MPPI all fulfill criteria as 5-HT1A receptor antagonists lacking intrinsic efficacy in the dorsal raphe system. The newly described compound NAD-299 exhibits antagonist potency comparable to that of WAY 100635 in this electrophysiological assay.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)1A receptor has been
implicated as the site mediating the anxiolytic effect of azapirone
drugs such as buspirone, gepirone, ipsapirone, and tandospirone (Traber and Glaser, 1987
; Chojnacka-Wojcik and Przegalinski, 1991
,
Martin et al., 1991
). More recently, this receptor has been suggested as a target for pharmacological intervention not only for the treatment
of anxiety but also for disorders such as depression, schizophrenia,
and dementia (Fletcher et al., 1993
). The potentially widespread
involvement of serotonin receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders
underlies the current surge in interest in deciphering the
physiological roles of 5-HT1A receptors. Although
this effort was greatly facilitated by identification of the first
5-HT1A receptor-selective agonist,
8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT;
Gozlan et al., 1983
), a full characterization of 5-HT1A receptor pharmacology has been impeded by the lack of selective antagonists.
A number of laboratories have developed putative
5-HT1A receptor antagonists. The first generation
of these compounds later were proved to be nonselective, behaved as
"partial" 5-HT1A receptor agonists, or both
(Hillver et al., 1990
; Bjork et al., 1991
; Claustre et al., 1991
).
Confusion has also arisen due to the use of different pharmacological
models in examining the functional activity of 5-HT1A receptor ligands. Because
5-HT1A receptors serve as both somatodendritic
autoreceptors on serotonergic neurons (Sotelo et al., 1990
), as well as
postsynaptic receptors in several brain regions, drug effects can vary
widely depending on whether the assay assesses a presynaptic versus a
postsynaptic function. For instance, a number of compounds display
only antagonist activity in models of postsynaptic
5-HT1A receptor function but exhibit weak to
moderate "partial" agonist properties in models of somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptor function (Meller et al.,
1990
; Claustre et al., 1991
; Cox et al., 1993
, Fornal et al., 1994a
, b
,
1996
).
Recently, a group of compounds were developed that are claimed to
behave as pure 5-HT1A receptor antagonists (i.e.,
compounds that are devoid of intrinsic activity in tests of either
presynaptic or postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor
activity). We have evaluated several of these drugs for their effects
on the extracellular, single-unit activities of rat dorsal raphe
neurons, a standard in vivo electrophysiological assay for evaluating
compounds with 5-HT1A receptor agonist or antagonist activity. The firing of dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons has been shown to be suppressed by systemic administration or iontophoretic or bath application of 5-HT1A
receptor agonists (Rogawski and Aghajanian, 1981
; Sprouse and
Aghajanian, 1987
; Aghajanian et al., 1990
), and this response is
blocked by 5-HT1A antagonists (Forster et al.,
1995
, 1996
). The inhibition of firing by serotonin agonists was found
to be mediated by direct activation of somatodendritic autoreceptors of
the 5-HT1A subtype (Sotelo et al., 1990
), which
cause opening of K+ channels via a pertussis
toxin-sensitive G protein and, consequently, membrane hyperpolarization
(Innis et al., 1988
; Williams et al., 1988
). The dorsal raphe
electrophysiological assay also has proved to be a very sensitive
indicator of partial agonist activity at 5-HT1A
receptors because the large autoreceptor reserve of dorsal raphe
neurons (Cox et al., 1993
) has permitted detection of weak agonist
properties even among drugs that appeared in other assays to act
exclusively as antagonists. Although the inhibition of dorsal raphe
neurons by their own transmitter is a critical autoregulatory mechanism, it is important to note that these cells also are subject to
a tonic excitatory noradrenergic input (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
),
and blockade of this influence by alpha-1 adrenergic
antagonists represents a second pharmacological means of suppressing
dorsal raphe cell firing (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1980
; Marwaha and
Aghajanian, 1982
).
Because there have been no comparative evaluations of the new group of
putative 5-HT1A antagonists on dorsal raphe
neuronal activity, we assessed the antagonist as well as possible
agonist-like properties of these drugs in this system by (1)
determining their abilities to elicit rightward shifts in the
dose-response curve of dorsal raphe neurons to i.v. 8-OH-DPAT,
(2) constructing i.v. dose-response curves for their abilities to
inhibit dorsal raphe cell firing over an extensive range of doses
(0.001-10 µmol/kg), and (3) determining whether they could reverse
the inhibition of raphe cell firing elicited by 8-OH-DPAT. The
following putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists
were evaluated: WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane-carboxamide; Forster et al., 1995
; Fletcher et al., 1996
;
Fornal et al., 1996
), p-MPPI
[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-[2'-[N-(2''-pyridinyl)-p-iodobenzamido]ethyl]piperazine; Kung et al., 1994
; Thielen et al., 1996
], and two new compounds synthesized and developed by Astra Arcus (Sweden), NAD-299
[(R)-3-N,N-dicyclobutylamino-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide; Johansson et al., 1997
] and NDL-249
[(R)-3-(N-propylamino)-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide].
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extracellular Single-Unit Recording Techniques.
Male
Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic, NY) weighing between 250 and 350 g
were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg i.p.) and positioned
in a stereotaxic apparatus. Body temperature was monitored by a rectal
probe and maintained between 36-38°C with a feedback-controlled
heating pad. A lateral tail vein was cannulated to allow i.v.
administration of additional chloral hydrate, as well as the test
compounds. The scalp was retracted, and a small burr hole was drilled
through the skull overlying the dorsal raphe nucleus. The dura was
removed with care taken to not lacerate the sagittal sinus, and any
meningeal bleeding was controlled with a hemostatic gel. Neurons of the
dorsal raphe were located within the stereotaxic boundaries: 0.0 to 0.2 mm lateral to midline, 0.3 to 0.7 mm anterior to the lambdoid suture,
and 5.5 to 6.5 mm ventral to the surface of the brain. These cells were
identified by their electrophysiological characteristics as previously
described (Rogawski and Aghajanian, 1981
; Sprouse and Aghajanian, 1987
; Cox et al., 1993
). Briefly, dorsal raphe serotonergic cells
characteristically demonstrated a slow firing rate (0.2-3 spikes/s)
and a wide, positive-negative extracellular action potential of
approximately 0.9- to 1.2-ms duration.
measured at 135 Hz. Extracellular action potentials of raphe neurons were amplified,
filtered, and displayed on an oscilloscope screen and passed to a
window discriminator and rate meter. Impulse rates were summed over
10-s intervals and simultaneously printed by a digital printer. Firing
rates were displayed as histogram plots of spikes/10 s versus time.
Only one cell was recorded from each rat to avoid residual drug
effects. At the end of each experiment, blue dye was iontophoretically ejected from the electrode tip for 20 to 30 min. Brains were fixed, and
later sectioned and examined, to confirm that the blue dye deposit
marking the recording site was within the dorsal raphe nucleus.
Responses to the drugs were quantified by comparing the average firing
rate during the 60-s period after each dose with the mean baseline
firing rate for that neuron. The responses of 7 to 14 cells were
averaged for each drug at each dose, and mean responses ± S.E.M.
were plotted as a function of the log dose. ED50
values were derived from best-fit sigmoidal curves generated by a
nonlinear curve-fitting computer program (GraphPAD Software, San Diego,
CA), which fitted the curve to the mean firing rate at each dose.
Intravenous Dose-Response Curves.
After encountering a
spontaneously active neuron with electrophysiological characteristics
of a serotonergic cell, a 3- to 5-min period of stable baseline firing
was recorded. Dose-response curves to 8-OH-DPAT, WAY 100635, NDL-249,
NAD-299, and p-MPPI were constructed by injecting doses
i.v. at 1-min intervals so that each successive dose doubled the
previous cumulative dose. The dose range for the suppression of raphe
cell firing by 8-OH-DPAT was established in our earlier study (Cox et
al., 1993
). Dose ranges for WAY 100635, NDL-249, NAD-299, and
p-MPPI were selected on the basis of prior in vivo
behavioral and/or electrophysiological studies in rats, as reported
previously (Forster et al., 1995
; Thielen and Frazer, 1995
; Fletcher et
al., 1996
; Thielen et al., 1996
; Johansson et al., 1997
). Initial doses
were 0.32 µg/kg (0.001 µmol/kg) for 8-OH-DPAT and 1 µg/kg for WAY
100635 (0.0018 µmol/kg), NDL-249 (0.0028 µmol/kg), NAD-299 (0.0021 µmol/kg), and p-MPPI (0.0017 µmol/kg). Additional
doses were administered until spontaneous firing was completely
inhibited or a cumulative dose of >4096 µg/kg was given. This
logarithmic sequence of drug administration at 1-min intervals is
conventional in in vivo electrophysiological studies of monoaminergic
neurons when comparing the actions of a series of structurally related,
lipophilic drugs that readily cross the blood-brain barrier (Martin et
al., 1990
; Cox et al., 1993
). In using this paradigm, it is recognized
that differences in the pharmacokinetics of brain uptake may contribute
to differences in the observed magnitude of drug effects.
Attempts to Reverse Inhibitions of Raphe Cell Firing with d-Amphetamine. To evaluate whether inhibitory effects of the above drugs might be mediated by alpha adrenergic receptor blockade, an attempt was made to reverse the inhibition of firing by subsequent i.v. administration of d-amphetamine (3.2 mg/kg). If the depressant effects of these compounds were due to adrenergic receptor blockade, then d-amphetamine (which induces release of norepinephrine) might be expected to reverse the inhibitory effect.
Materials. 8-OH-DPAT was obtained from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). WAY 100635, NDL-249, and NAD-299 were all synthesized and provided by Astra Arcus (Södertälje, Sweden). p-MPPI was generously supplied by Dr. Hank Kung (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Solutions of the above drugs were prepared fresh before use in 0.9% NaCl at a concentration of 0.25 or 1.0 mg/ml. Chloral hydrate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in distilled water.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antagonist Properties of WAY 100635, NAD-299, NDL-249, and p-MPPI. In agreement with previous reports, 8-OH-DPAT was found to be an extremely potent agonist in inhibiting the firing of dorsal raphe neurons (Figs. 1 and 2). In the present studies, 8-OH-DPAT caused a complete suppression of raphe cell firing at doses below 10 µg/kg and with a calculated ED50 of 1.3 ± 0.3 µg/kg. Prior administration of each of the four putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, WAY 100635, NDL-249, NAD-299, or p-MPPI (doses equivalent to 0.02-0.03 µmol/kg), produced significant rightward shifts in the dose-response curve of dorsal raphe neurons to 8-OH-DPAT (Figs. 1 and 2). The ED50 values for 8-OH-DPAT alone, and after pretreatment with each of the antagonists, are given in Table 1. These findings suggest that WAY 100635, NAD-299, NDL-249, and p-MPPI can act as antagonists of the effects of 8-OH-DPAT at 5-HT1A somatodendritic autoreceptors.
|
|
|
Effects of WAY 100635, NAD-299, NDL-249, and p-MPPI on Raphe Cell Firing. To assess whether the above drugs might possess agonist-like properties, changes in raphe cell firing were monitored during i.v. administration of each of the putative antagonists over an extensive range of doses. Over the lower range of doses tested, none of the drugs caused changes in firing exceeding ±20% of the basal firing rate before drug injection. Unexpectedly, at higher doses, the administration of WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249 each produced dose-dependent inhibitions of dorsal raphe cell firing (Figs. 3 and 4). Both WAY 100635 and NDL-249 caused complete inhibitions of firing, whereas NAD-299 caused somewhat less than a full inhibition in some cells. However, the suppression of firing by these three compounds was observed only at high doses (>0.1 µmol/kg), whereas 8-OH-DPAT inhibited firing at doses 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower. In contrast, p-MPPI caused no consistent inhibitory effects at similarly high (i.e., equimolar) doses; some raphe cells were moderately inhibited (see Fig. 3), whereas others exhibited large fluctuations in firing and/or appeared unstable and stimulated at the higher range of doses (Fig. 4).
|
|
|
Reversal by d-Amphetamine of Effects of WAY 100635, NAD-29, and NDL-249.
Because the firing of dorsal raphe neurons
can also be inhibited by administration of alpha
adrenergic antagonists that block the tonic excitatory noradrenergic
input these cells receive (Baraban and Aghajanian, 1980
; Marwaha and
Aghajanian, 1982
), it was of interest to determine whether the
inhibitory effects of WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249 were due to
alpha adrenergic receptor blockade rather than to
5-HT1A receptor agonism. If alpha receptor
blockade were responsible, the effect should be reversed by increasing adrenergic tone. In accordance with this prediction, the inhibition of
firing caused by each of the three putative antagonists could be
rapidly and fully reversed by a moderate (3.2 mg/kg) i.v. dose of
d-amphetamine (n = 3-4 for each
antagonist), whereas the inhibition elicited by the selective
5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT was not reversed by
d-amphetamine, even after administration of doses up to
6.4 or 12.8 mg/kg (n = 5; Fig.
5).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study represents the first comparative evaluation of a series of "silent" 5-HT1A receptor antagonists in a sensitive in vivo assay of 5-HT1A somatodendritic autoreceptor activity. We evaluated and compared the antagonist potency as well as the intrinsic effects of the two most widely cited silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, WAY 100635 and p-MPPI, on the firing of rat dorsal raphe neurons. Additionally, we reported for the first time data on two new and structurally unique 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, NAD-299 and NDL-249, and show that they possess a pharmacological profile similar to that of WAY 100635 in this system.
Our results confirm that the four drugs all behave as competitive
5-HT1A receptor antagonists, as assessed by their
abilities to cause a significant rightward shift in the dose-response
curve for the inhibition of dorsal raphe neuronal firing by 8-OH-DPAT, as well as the abilities of three of the four drugs to subsequently reverse the inhibitory effects of 8-OH-DPAT on raphe cell firing. At
equimolar doses (0.02-0.03 µmol/kg), WAY 100635 and NAD-299 exhibited the greatest degree of antagonist effect (13- and 14-fold rightward shifts, respectively), followed by p-MPPI and
NDL-249 (4- and 5-fold rightward shifts, respectively). These results replicate the findings of Forster et al. (1995)
and Fletcher et al.
(1996)
in demonstrating that pretreatment with a 10 µg/kg dose of WAY
100635 almost completely prevents the inhibitory effect of 8-OH-DPAT up
to a dose of about 10 µg/kg, a dose that normally fully suppresses
dorsal raphe cell firing. We extended the agonist dose-response curve
to determine an ED50 for 8-OH-DPAT in the presence of WAY 100635 and found that on the basis of the degree of
shift in the 8-OH-DPAT dose-response curve, WAY 100635 was one of the
two most potent antagonists in the series tested. Indeed, it caused a
3- to 4-fold greater increase in the ED50 for
8-OH-DPAT than did pretreatment with a roughly equimolar dose (10 µg/kg) of p-MPPI.
Another outcome of these experiments was the first demonstration of
antagonist activity of p-MPPI in the dorsal raphe
electrophysiological assay. Previous reports have shown that
p-MPPI behaves as an antagonist in both in vitro and in vivo
tests of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor activity,
such as blockade of the 8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in rat hippocampal membranes (Kung et al., 1994
) and blockade of 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia and
reciprocal forepaw treading (Thielen and Frazer, 1995
; Thielen et al.,
1996
). To date, p-MPPI has been evaluated in only one assay
of in vivo somatodendritic autoreceptor activity (i.e., changes in the
5-hydroxyindole acetic acid/5-HT ratio in the rat hippocampus
and striatum), and it was shown to inhibit the 8-OH-DPAT-induced decrease in 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid/5-HT in both brain areas. However, in this assay, a comparatively high (5-10 mg/kg) i.p. dose
was required to block the effect of 8-OH-DPAT (Thielen et al., 1996
).
In our studies, an i.v. dose of p-MPPI that was 1000-fold lower (10 µg/kg) produced a significant 4-fold rightward shift in the
dose-response curve for the inhibition of raphe cell firing by
8-OH-DPAT, confirming the antagonist action of p-MPPI in
this more sensitive measure of somatodendritic autoreceptor activity. It is not clear why subsequent administration of an additional 10 to 20 µg/kg dose of p-MPPI was unable to reverse the inhibition of raphe cell by 8-OH-DPAT, as was possible with the other compounds. Pharmacokinetic factors, such as a slower brain uptake, or the somewhat
lower affinity of p-MPPI at 5-HT1A
receptors (Ki = 0.2, 0.6, and 1 nM for
WAY 100635, NAD-299, and p-MPPI, respectively; Kung et al.,
1994
; Johansson et al., 1997
) might account for its inability to
reverse the effect of 8-OH-DPAT. Higher doses may need to have been
given to demonstrate reversal with p-MPPI.
Our results also provide the first published evidence of
5-HT1A somatodendritic autoreceptor antagonist
activity of two newer compounds, NAD-299 and NDL-249, in the dorsal
raphe electrophysiological assay and show that the former drug causes a
shift in the 8-OH-DPAT dose-response curve similar in magnitude to that
of a roughly equimolar dose of WAY 100635. This finding places NAD-299
on a par with WAY 100635 as one of the two most potent
5-HT1A antagonists yet described in this test
system. The similarity in the degree of shift in the 8-OH-DPAT
dose-response curves by NAD-299 and WAY 100635 in our study contrasts
with the somewhat higher potency of WAY 100635 for antagonizing various
other 8-OH-DPAT-induced responses in vivo and in vitro (Johansson et
al., 1997
). The apparent difference in potency between our study and
other in vivo assays may reflect differences in routes of
administration and pharmacokinetics rather than true differences in
antagonist activity of the two compounds. In each of these tests,
neither WAY 100635 nor NAD-299 exhibited any intrinsic agonist activity
by themselves (Johansson et al., 1997
).
A second line of experiments examined whether the four antagonists
might possess intrinsic effects on dorsal raphe cell firing when
administered alone over an extensive range of doses. Unexpectedly, three of the four compounds, WAY 100635, NDL-249, and NAD-299, also
caused dose-dependent and ultimately complete inhibitions of raphe cell
firing. However, inhibitory effects were typically observed only at
very high doses (above 0.1 µmol/kg) of each drug. The
ED50 values for inhibition were 30-fold higher
than the doses that were shown in our earlier study to antagonize the
actions of 8-OH-DPAT on raphe cell firing. Nevertheless, the inhibitory effects contrast with previous reports on WAY 100635 that have asserted
that this drug lacks agonist-like effects in a broad range of tests of
either postsynaptic or somatodendritic autoreceptor 5-HT1A receptor activity (Forster et al., 1995
;
Corradetti et al., 1996
; Fletcher et al., 1996
; Fornal et al., 1996
).
It should be noted that in previous studies performed in anesthetized
rats, which most closely parallel our studies, effects of i.v.
administration of WAY 100635 on raphe cell firing were evaluated only
to a maximal dose of 100 µg/kg (Forster et al., 1995
; Fletcher et
al., 1996
), a dose on the threshold of inhibition of firing in our
studies. In awake cats, doses as high as 500 µg/kg, somewhat higher
than the ED50 for inhibition in rats, caused only
increases in raphe cell firing (Fornal et al., 1996
). In view of the
species difference and the fact that anesthesia may alter autoreceptor
modulation of raphe neuronal activity (Fornal et al., 1994a
), it is
unclear whether doses higher than 500 µg/kg would have suppressed
raphe cell firing in cats. Nevertheless, our results do suggest that inhibitory effects of WAY 100635 on raphe cell firing were not detected
in earlier studies on rats because the doses given were not high
enough. They further suggests that raphe cell firing may be partially
to fully inhibited in biochemical and behavioral models where WAY
100635 is given to rats in doses ranging from 0.1 to 1 mg/kg and that
this inhibition of serotonergic neuronal activity might contribute to
the observed biochemical and behavioral effects. Likewise, similarly
high doses of NAD-299 or NDL-249 might be expected to suppress raphe
cell firing in in vivo studies in rats, although the inhibitory effects
of these drugs may not be mediated by an action at
5-HT1A receptors (see discussion below).
Unlike the responses to WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249, no consistent effects on raphe cell firing were observed with p-MPPI. There was, however, considerable variability in response to this drug, with some cells showing increases as well as moderate decreases in firing. At the higher range of doses, recordings frequently became unstable with broadening of the extracellular spike and a shift to a burst pattern of firing. Overall, the lack of change in the average firing rates distinguishes p-MPPI from the other drugs tested. The basis for this difference in response is not clear. It is conceivable that nonspecific (i.e., nonpharmacological) membrane-depolarizing effects of p-MPPI masked a tendency of this drug to inhibit raphe cell firing, at least for some of the cells tested.
The inhibitory effects of the other three compounds raise questions
about the mechanism underlying this effect. Considering the fact that
numerous drugs (including BMY 7378, ipsapirone, buspirone, NAN-190, and
WAY 100135) were previously claimed to be 5-HT1A
receptor antagonists but later found to behave as agonists in the
dorsal raphe system (Claustre et al., 1991
; Cox et al., 1993
, Fornal et
al., 1994a
, b
, 1996
), we considered the possibility that these
5-HT1A receptor antagonists might also possess
weak 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity. Although
previous studies with both WAY 100635 and NAD-299, including
biochemical and electrophysiological assays of autoreceptor function
(Fletcher et al., 1996
; Johansson et al., 1997
; Ahlenius et al., 1998
),
have detected no evidence of intrinsic activity at
5-HT1A receptors, the inhibition of dorsal raphe
cell firing might represent a more sensitive assay for detecting weak
agonist efficacy. Alternatively, because extremely high doses were
required to elicit the response, it was conceivable that the inhibition
of firing was mediated via another receptor type, such as
alpha adrenergic receptor blockade. Alpha
adrenergic receptor antagonists have long been known to produce effects
similar to 5-HT1A receptor agonists (i.e., they
inhibit the firing of dorsal raphe neurons; Baraban and Aghajanian,
1980
; Marwaha and Aghajanian, 1982
) but in this case by blocking
the tonic noradrenergic excitatory influence these cell receive
(Baraban and Aghajanian, 1981
). Accordingly, alpha
adrenergic agonists and drugs that increase adrenergic tone, such as
amphetamine, have been shown to reverse this effect and restore firing
(Baraban and Aghajanian, 1980
). We used a similar strategy to evaluate
whether alpha adrenergic receptor blockade, rather than
5-HT1A receptor agonism, might mediate the
inhibition of raphe cell firing in our studies and found that i.v.
administration of a 3.2 mg/kg dose of d-amphetamine could
indeed readily and fully reverse the inhibitory effects of high doses
of WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249, although the inhibition by the
selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT was
not antagonized. Similar in vivo doses of amphetamine (2.5-3.0 mg/kg)
have been shown to cause a rapid and pronounced increase in
extracellular norepinephrine in rat cortex and hippocampus (Kuczenski
and Segal, 1992
) but no significant change in extracellular serotonin
levels (Kankaanpää et al., 1998
). Thus, the ability of
amphetamine to reverse the inhibitory effects of the three
5-HT1A receptor antagonists is most likely a
consequence of elevated norepinephrine levels in the raphe and the
subsequent displacement of these antagonists from alpha
adrenergic receptors.
In further support of alpha adrenergic receptor blockade as
a possible mechanism for the rate-suppressant effects, each of the
drugs we evaluated binds to alpha-1 adrenoceptors at mid to high nanomolar concentrations. For instance,
Ki values for WAY 100635, p-MPPI, and NAD-299 at alpha-1 receptors are 45, 35, and 260 nM, respectively (Kung et al., 1994
; Johansson et al.,
1997
); a Ki of 270 nM has been
determined for NDL-249 (L. Unelius and N. Mohell, personal
communication). Although the affinity for 5-HT1A
receptors exceeds that at alpha-1 receptors by almost
200-fold for WAY 100635 and by more than 400-fold for NAD-299
(Johansson et al., 1997
), the concentrations achieved in brain after
>0.1 µmol/kg i.v. doses of these drugs may have exceeded the
concentration range over which they are selective for
5-HT1A receptors. In support of this possibility,
Craven et al. (1994)
reported that a high (300 nM) concentration of WAY
100635 caused a gradual but pronounced slowing of raphe cell firing in
a slice preparation of the guinea pig dorsal raphe nucleus, and they
attributed the effect to antagonism of the alpha-1 receptor
agonist phenylephrine, which was added to stimulate raphe cell firing
in the slice. Thus, our finding that the in vivo inhibition of raphe
cell firing by high doses of WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249 could
be reversed by d-amphetamine suggests that the inhibitory
effects were likely to have been mediated by alpha
adrenergic receptor blockade rather than 5-HT1A receptor agonism. However, a contribution by the latter or other mechanisms cannot be definitively ruled out on this basis.
In summary, we confirmed the antagonist properties of WAY 100635 and p-MPPI in an assay of somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptor activity, and we provided evidence that two newer compounds, NAD-299 and NDL-249, possess a similar profile as 5-HT1A antagonists in this system. Indeed, NAD-299 exhibits antagonist potency in this system on a par with the reference antagonist at 5-HT1A receptors, WAY 100635. Although very high (>0.1 µmol/kg) doses of WAY 100635, NAD-299, and NDL-249 can also inhibit raphe cell firing, this effect appears not to be attributable to 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist activity but may instead be due to alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blockade. Thus, we conclude that the four drugs behave as pure or "silent" antagonists at the 5-HT1A autoreceptors regulating dorsal raphe neuronal firing and that at appropriate doses (below 0.1 µmol/kg in vivo), these drugs may serve as useful tools for distinguishing specifically the functions of 5-HT1A receptors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 8, 1998.
Received for publication April 2, 1998.
1 This work was supported in part by Astra Arcus AB (Södertälje, Sweden) and by United States Public Health Service Grant NS23541 (B.L.W.).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Barbara L. Waszczak, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 312 Mugar Hall, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: b.waszczak{at}nunet.neu.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; 8-OH-DPAT, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin; WAY 100635, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide; p-MPPI, 4-(2-methoxyphenyl)1-[2'-[N-(2''-pyridinyl)-p-iodobenzamido]ethyl]piperazine; NDL-249, (R)-3-(N-propylamino)-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide, NAD-299 (R)-3-N,N-dicyclobutylamino-8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-5-carboxamide.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
)-UH-310 at rat
brain monoamine receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, in
press.
)-propranolol on serotonergic dorsal raphe unit activity in behaving cats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
270:
1359-1366This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. V. Puig, F. Artigas, and P. Celada Modulation of the Activity of Pyramidal Neurons in Rat Prefrontal Cortex by Raphe Stimulation In Vivo: Involvement of Serotonin and GABA Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2005; 15(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Celada, M. V. Puig, J. M. Casanovas, G. Guillazo, and F. Artigas Control of Dorsal Raphe Serotonergic Neurons by the Medial Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement of Serotonin-1A, GABAA, and Glutamate Receptors J. Neurosci., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 9917 - 9929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Riad, K. C. Watkins, E. Doucet, M. Hamon, and L. Descarries Agonist-Induced Internalization of Serotonin-1A Receptors in the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus (Autoreceptors) But Not Hippocampus (Heteroreceptors) J. Neurosci., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 8378 - 8386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||