![]() |
|
|
Vol. 288, Issue 2, 582-589, February 1999
Sanofi Recherche, Montpellier Cedex, France (M.P., M.R.-C., T.C., C.P.-C., F.B., P.C.); Sanofi Recherche, Labège Cedex, France (F.P., B.C.); and Sanofi Recherche, Paris, France (G. Le F.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present report, we investigated in detail the effects of SR
144528, a selective antagonist of the peripheral cannabinoid receptor
(CB2), on two well-characterized functions mediated by CB2: the
induction of the early response gene krox24 and the inhibition of
adenylyl cyclase. We generated Chinese hamster ovary cells doubly
transfected with human CB2 and a luciferase reporter gene linked to
either the murine krox24 regulatory sequence or multiple cAMP
responsive elements. Our results show that (1) SR 144528 antagonizes
the effect of receptor agonists
it inhibits the krox24 reporter
activity and prevents the inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP reporter
activity mediated by CP 55,940; (2) CB2 is autoactivated
CB2 mediates
signaling in the absence of ligand, and this basal activity is reduced
by pretreating the cells with pertussis toxin; (3) SR 144528 is an
inverse agonist
it reproduces the effects of pertussis toxin; and (4)
inhibition of precoupled CB2 by a long-term pretreatment of cells with
SR 144528 potentiates krox24 response to cannabinoid receptor agonists
and restores activation of adenylyl cyclase. Taken together, these data
provide evidences for the inverse agonist property of SR 144528 and the
constitutive activation of CB2 in Chinese hamster ovary-expressing cells.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cannabimimetics
have been described as exerting their diverse biological actions
through both receptor- and non-receptor-mediated pathways (Lynn and
Herkenham, 1994
). Cannabinoid receptors belong to the G protein-coupled
receptor (GPCR) superfamily and include central (CB1) receptors
(Herkenham et al., 1990
; Matsuda et al., 1990
) and peripheral (CB2)
receptors, described predominantly in cells of the immune system
(Munroe et al., 1993
; Galiègue et al., 1995
). Together with the
characterization of receptor subtypes and the search for specific
antagonists, a considerable effort has been carried out to identify
natural endogenous ligands. Such a ligand, arachidonylethanolamide
(anandamide), has been isolated from porcine brain and was shown to
exhibit the properties of
9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(
9-THC), the major psychoactive component of
marijuana, in many in vitro and in vivo studies (Devane et al., 1992
;
Das et al., 1995
; Felder et al., 1995
). The presence of anandamide was
reported in human brain but also in human spleen, which is known to
express high CB2 levels (Felder et al., 1996
). A second endogenous
ligand, 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG), isolated from canine intestines (Mechoulam et al., 1995
) and recently identified in greater amount in
rat brain (Stella et al., 1997
), was found to modulate biological functions of murine splenocytes (Lee et al., 1995
).
Immunoregulatory effects of cannabimimetics have been established for
many years (Hollister, 1988
). Although the functional role of CB2
remains unclear, its predominant expression in immune tissues taken
with in vitro studies on lymphocytes suggests that it specifically
mediates both immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory effects (Derocq
et al., 1995
; Kaminsky, 1996
; Sanchez et al., 1997
). The identification
of selective ligands (agonists and antagonists) is warranted to
investigate the respective contribution of CB1 and CB2, and perhaps
other cannabinoid receptor subtypes, in functional cannabinoid effects
in vivo. Toward this end, we generated Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell
lines transformed with human CB2 and a reporter gene fused to either
the regulatory sequences of the early response gene krox24 or multiple
copies of cAMP responsive elements (CRE) linked to a minimal promoter.
We previously showed that stimulation of cannabinoid receptors was
followed by the induction of krox24 protein and activation of its
function (Bouaboula et al., 1995a
,b
, 1996
). The physiological relevance
of krox24 modulation in the cannabinoid system was also illustrated by
two independent studies showing a stimulatory effect of
9-THC on krox24 gene expression in rat
forebrain and striatosomes (Mailleux et al., 1994
; Glass and Dragunow,
1995
). Negative coupling of CB1 and CB2 to adenylyl cyclase (AC)
is well documented in neuroblastoma or lymphoid cell lines, as well as
in nontransformed cells or in heterologous systems (Slipetz et al.,
1995
; Childers and Deadwyler, 1996
; Jung et al., 1997
). In immune
cells, the modulation of intracellular levels of cAMP by cannabinoid
receptor ligands is associated with the regulation of expression of
specific genes, including interleukin-2, a cytokine involved in
activation of T-cell functions, and inducible nitric oxide synthase
(iNOS), which mediates cytolytic effects of macrophages (Kaminsky,
1996
).
By using the double transformed CHO cell lines, we investigated the
biological responses associated with CB2. Furthermore, we analyzed the
effects of the newly described selective CB2 antagonist SR 144528 (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1998
) on both the cAMP and the krox24
pathways. We show here that SR 144528 not only antagonizes the response
elicited by cannabinoid receptor agonists but also acts as an inverse agonist.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents.
CP 55,940 {(
)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]4-[3-hydroxypropyl]cyclohexan-1-ol},
SR 144528 {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide}, and SR 141716 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide] were synthesized at the Chemistry Department of Sanofi Recherche (Montpellier, France). WIN 55212-2 {(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl)methanone} and Ro20-1274
{4-[(3-butoxy-4-methoxyphenyl)methyl]2-imidazolidinone} were from
Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA).
9-THC,
anandamide, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA), forskolin (FSK), and
pertussis toxin (PTX) were purchased from Sigma Chemical (Saint-Quantin
Fallavier, France).
Plasmids.
The vector comprising the
395/+65 sequence of
the murine krox24 promoter upstream from the coding sequence of firefly
luciferase (pUT112-krox24) has already been described (Poinot-Chazel et
al., 1996
), as has the p661 plasmid containing six consensus cAMP
responsive elements (CRE) linked to firefly luciferase (Bouaboula et
al., 1997
). To generate stable CHO double transformants, human CB2 cDNA
was cloned in either pcDNA-3 (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA) or a vector
optimized for expression of recombinant proteins in CHO cells (Miloux
and Lupker, 1994
).
Stable Transfections.
Conditions of transfection of CHO
cells by electroporation were as previously described (Poinot-Chazel et
al., 1996
). Cells were first transformed with pUT112-Krox24 (CKL cells)
or p661 (CCL cells), before a second round of transformation with the expression vector for CB2, leading to CKL-CB2 cells or CCL-CB2 cells.
Cells were screened for CB2 membrane expression and responsiveness of
the reporter gene. All cell lines were subcloned by limiting dilution,
and one cell clone was selected for each transformation.
Cell Stimulation and Luciferase Assay.
Cells were plated
onto white 96-well microplates in
-mimimal essential medium (GIBCO
BRL, Eragny, France) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and
incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The next day, the medium was removed
and replaced by fetal calf serum-free medium, and cells were further
incubated for 24 h at 37°C. For analysis of krox24 or cAMP
reporter activities, cells were stimulated for 1.5 and 4 h,
respectively. To prepare crude extracts, cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed using the Cell Culture Lysis
Reagent (Promega, Charbonnières, France). Luciferase activities
were determined using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison,
WI), and luminescence was detected using a CCD camera (MTP Reader,
Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). Quantification of light
emission was obtained by photon counting and mean values from
triplicate samples were expressed in relative light units (RLUs). All
experiments were repeated at least three times.
cAMP Assays.
Measurements of cAMP levels were as previously
described (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1998
). Briefly, cells were incubated
for 15 min at 37°C in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 0.25% acid-free bovine serum albumin, 0.1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine, and 0.2 mM Ro20-1274 in the presence or absence of 3 × 10
9 M CP 55,940. FSK (3 µM) was added, and cells were
further incubated for 20 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of ice-cold buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8, and 4 mM EDTA. Extracts were boiled and centrifuged for 10 min at
3500g to remove cell debris. Supernatants were dried,
and cAMP concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay using the
scintillant proximity assay system (Amersham, Les Ulis, France).
Western Blot Analysis.
Cells were stimulated for 90 min
before being lysed in Laemmli's buffer containing 6 M urea. The amount
of proteins in each sample was determined by using the Protein Assay
kit (BioRad, Ivry sur Seine, France). Preparation of proteins and
conditions of Western blotting were as previously published
(Poinot-Chazel et al., 1996
). Briefly, cell extracts were heated for 10 min at 95°C, and 17 µg of protein per lane was fractionated by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 12%
acrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose filters,
and blots were hybridized with the anti-krox24 antibody (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) at a concentration of 0.25 µg/ml. Immunocomplexes were revealed by a peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit IgG conjugate associated with the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham).
Binding Experiments and Data Analysis. For binding assays, membranes (100 µg) were incubated for 1 h at 30°C with [3H]CP 55,940 in 1 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.7). The concentration of [3H]CP 55,940 was 0.2 nM in competition studies and 0.05 to 20 nM in equilibrium binding assays. A rapid filtration technique using Whatman GF/C filters [pretreated with polyethyleneimine 0.5% (w/v) and a 48-well filtration apparatus (Brandel)] was used to harvest and rinse membranes (three times with 5 ml of cold buffer A containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin). The radioactivity bound to the filters was counted with 4 ml of Biofluor scintillant. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled CP 55,940. Data from binding assays were analyzed using a computerized nonlinear least-squares method. All experiments were performed in duplicate, and results were confirmed in at least three independent experiments.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of CB2 in CHO Cell Lines.
CHO cells were first
transfected with the krox24 reporter (CKL cells) or the cAMP reporter
(CCL cells) before a second round of transformation with hCB2 (CKL-CB2
or CCL-CB2 cells), as detailed under Materials and
Methods. Membrane expression of CB2 was verified by flow
cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy using the anti-CB2
antibody 4AP (Galiègue et al., 1995
) recognizing the C-terminal
portion of CB2 (data not shown). We measured the expression level of
CB2 in both cell lines by using [3H]CP 55,940 as a
ligand. The nonlinear regression analysis of saturation curves
revealed the presence of one class of high affinity binding sites
for [3H]CP 55,940. The apparent equilibrium dissociation
constant (KD) value and total binding site
number (Bmax) were 0.96 ± 0.24 nM and
2.42 ± 0.38 pmol/mg protein for CKL-CB2 cells and 0.46 ± 0.06 nM and 2.88 ± 0.19 pmol/mg protein for CCL-CB2 cells,
respectively. The specific [3H]CP 55,940 binding was
displaced in a concentration-dependent manner by unlabeled CP 55,940, with IC50 values of 6.2 ± 0.5 nM for CKL-CB2 cells
and 5.3 ± 0.3 nM for CCL-CB2 cells (data not shown).
Effect of Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists on Reporter Activities. The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 induces krox24 reporter activity in CKL-CB2 cells but not CKL cells, with an EC50 of 9.3 ± 2.8 nM (Fig. 1A). Western blot analysis confirmed at the protein level that the transgene behaved like the endogenous krox24 gene (Fig. 1B), and quantification of autoradiograms showed a good correlation with results obtained from reporter experiments (data not shown). PMA was used to verify the inducibility of krox24 gene in both the CB2-expressing and nonexpressing cell lines.
|
6 M FSK was prevented by
pretreating CCL-CB2 cells with CP 55,940 (Fig. 1C). The
IC50 for inhibition by CP 55,940 was 0.29 ± 0.01 nM, indicating a potent functional negative coupling of CB2 to AC.
Alternatively, CP 55,940 had no effect on FSK induction of luciferase
in parental CCL cells (Fig. 1C). As a control, we also verified the
inhibitory effect of CP 55,940 on cAMP levels induced by FSK. Figure 1C
shows that 3 × 10
9 M CP 55,940 partially
prevented cAMP induced by 3 × 10
6 M FSK,
whereas higher concentrations of CP 55,940 led to a complete inhibition
of cAMP (data not shown). Similar results were obtained in reporter
assays when FSK was used at 3 × 10
6 M
instead of 10
6 M (data not shown).
In addition to CP 55,940, the effect of the plant cannabinoid
9-THC and the synthetic cannabinoid WIN
55212-2 was investigated. IC50 and
EC50 values from binding and luciferase assays
are summarized in Table 1. The biological
activities elicited by the drugs were in agreement with their binding
potencies, except for
9-THC. In fact,
induction of krox24 reporter by
9-THC was
extremely low and only detectable with high concentrations (> 10
6 M) of the drug. In addition, inhibition of
FSK-induced cAMP reporter activity by
9-THC
was partial (maximal 60% inhibition), with an
IC50 of 23.3 ± 2.6 nM. Although this value
is similar to its IC50 value,
9-THC potency was found more than 1 order of
magnitude lower than that of the other compounds investigated. The
discrepancy between the CB2 binding efficiency of
9-THC and its weak functional effect in
reporter assays led us to investigate whether it could behave as an
antagonist for CB2. As shown in Fig. 2,
9-THC shifted the stimulation curve obtained
with CP 55,940 to the right. When CP 55,940 was used as
10
8 M, the inhibitory effect of
9-THC was detectable at
10
8 M and complete at
10
6 M. We next examined whether this
antagonistic effect could be also obtained with other compounds
exhibiting a low affinity for CB2: anandamide, which by itself only
slightly stimulated krox24-luciferase in CKL-CB2 cells
(1.5-2-fold-increase at 3 × 10
7 M), did
not prevent CP 55,940-induced reporter activity (data not shown).
|
|
Antagonist Property of SR 144528.
We recently described SR
144528 as the first potent and selective CB2 antagonist, which can
displace the binding of [3H]CP 55,940 to CHO cells
transfected with CB2, with a selectivity for CB2 versus CB1 of 700-fold
(Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1998
). Displacement of [3H]CP
55,940 binding by SR 144528 indicated IC50 values of
5.85 ± 1.59 nM for CKL-CB2 cells and 6.06 ± 1.05 nM for
CCL-CB2 cells (data not shown). We next investigated the antagonistic
potential of SR 144528 on the modulation of the two reporters by
receptor agonists. Figure 3A shows that
SR 144528 prevents krox24-driven luciferase induction in CKL-CB2 cells
stimulated by CP 55,940. Similar results were obtained when WIN 55212-2 was used as an agonist (data not shown). Interestingly, when agonist
concentration was suboptimal (10
8 M), the inhibition of
reporter activity by SR 144528 not only reversed the CP 55,940 effect
but high concentrations of the antagonist also decreased luciferase
values to below baseline level (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, the
inhibition mediated by CP 55,940 of FSK-induced cAMP reporter activity
was prevented by pretreating CCL-CB2 cells with SR 144528 (Fig. 3B).
Again, high concentrations of SR 144528 not only reversed CP 55,940 effect but also led to an increase (2-5-fold) in FSK response above
baseline. Under the same conditions, the CB1 antagonist SR 141716 had
no effect in both CKL-CB2 or CCL-CB2 cells (data not shown).
|
Inverse Agonist Property of SR 144528.
The latter results
showing that SR 144528 effect was not limited to an antagonist property
suggested the existence of CB2 precoupled to the G protein and
suggested that SR 144528 may be an inverse agonist. An enhanced level
of signal transduction in the absence of ligand stimulation is
associated with receptor autoactivation. Furthermore, treatment of
cells with PTX, which selectively ADP-ribosylates
Gi/Go proteins and thus prevents receptor coupling to G protein, is expected to block downstream signaling from
such autoactivated receptors. As shown in Fig.
4A, CKL-CB2 cells exhibited a higher
constitutive krox24-luciferase activity than the parental cell line,
CKL. Similar results were obtained by comparing the basal amounts of
endogenous krox24 protein in both cell lines: quantification of the
signals on the autoradiogram shown in Fig. 1B indicated a 2.85-fold
increase of krox24 protein in CKL-CB2 cells versus CKL cells.
Accordingly, treatment of CKL-CB2 cells for 4 h with 50 ng/ml PTX
decreased basal activity to the level in parental cells, whereas it did
not affect these latter (Fig. 4A). An inverse agonist for a
Go/Gi-coupled receptor, by preventing
constitutive activity, is expected to reproduce the effect of PTX.
Incubation of CKL-CB2 cells with 10
7 M SR 144528 for
various lengths of time led to a decrease of basal activity that is
consistent with such a property (Fig. 4B). In control experiments, the
selective CB1 antagonist SR 141716 had no effect under the same
conditions, whereas SR 144528 did not modulate constitutive luciferase
activity in CKL cells, indicating that the above results are
specifically receptor mediated (data not shown).
|
6 M FSK in CCL-CB2 cells, without
affecting the FSK response in CCL cells (Fig. 5B). The stimulatory
curve is consistent with a CB2-mediated effect because maximal
promoting effect was obtained with 3 × 10
8 M SR 144528.
|
Enhancement of CB2-Mediated Responses by SR 144528.
Inverse
agonists, in addition to their inhibitory potential of constitutive
signaling, were described in a number of case to up-regulate GPCR
expression. Thus, we investigated whether sustained treatment of cells
with SR 144528 altered agonist-induced signaling. Cells were treated
for 18 h with increasing concentrations of SR 144528 or the
vehicle, extensively washed, and further stimulated for 90 min with
medium containing CP 55,940. As illustrated on Fig.
6A, an increase of the relative level of
induction by CP 55,940 of the krox24 reporter was observed. Optimal
results were obtained when SR 144528 was used as the concentration of
10
8 M, whereas higher concentrations did not further
increase the functional response. When examining precisely the effect
of SR 144528, we observed that in addition to the expected reduction of
luciferase basal level by the inverse agonist, the relative level of
induction by CP 55,940 was promoted by ~3-fold. On the other hand, a
sustained pretreatment with CP 55,940 (10
8 M) or
9-THC (10
7 M), followed by an extensive
washing, completely prevented further stimulation with CP 55,940 (Fig.
6B). Finaly, the promoting effect of SR 144528 (10
8 M)
was abolished when CP 55,940 or
9-THC was added during
the time of pretreatment (data not shown). Similar experiments
performed with CCL-CB2 cells confirmed that prolonging the time of cell
pretreatment with SR 144528 further raised the level of FSK-induced
CRE-luciferase activity (data not shown).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We generated two reporter models consisting of CHO cells doubly transformed with hCB2 and a luciferase reporter gene linked to regulatory sequences of the early response gene krox24 or a CRE to investigate the functional activation of CB2 by cannabinoid receptor ligands, including the newly described antagonist SR 144528.
We first studied the pharmacological profile of classic ligands and we
observed a similar order of potency when comparing luciferase assays
and binding experiments, except for
9-THC,
which behaves as an antagonist for the CB2 receptor in the krox24-luciferase assay. This latter result is in agreement with data
showing that the inhibition of FSK-induced cAMP levels by the ligands
HU-210 and HU-293a was prevented by
9-THC in
CHO cells expressing CB2 (Bayewitch et al., 1996
). Thus the described
effects of
9-THC on immune functions must be
carefully reexamined by considering that they may not be the result of
a direct stimulation of CB2 but rather an inhibition of the effect of
an endogenous ligand. In addition, the antagonist potential of
9-THC for CB2 associated with its agonistic
effect for CB1 could explain the contradictory conclusions on
immunosuppressive or immunostimulatory properties of the drug in
biological situations where both receptors are expressed.
It is noteworthy that half-maximal values from cAMP reporter assays are
more than 1 order of magnitude lower than those from krox24 reporter
assays. We have previously shown that the induction of krox24 gene
mediated by CB2 paralleled the activation of MAPK in CHO cells
expressing CB2 but also in the human promyelomonocytic cell line HL60
(Bouaboula et al., 1996
). In additional experiments, we observed that
the inhibitor of MAPK kinase PD 098059, as well as the inhibitor of
phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase wortmannin, completely prevented
induction of krox24 reporter by 10
7 M CP 55,940 in CKL-CB2 cells, with IC50 of 3.9 ± 0.7 µM and 32.1 ± 4.4 nM, respectively (data not shown). This
results favor the hypothesis that the krox24 pathway may be activated
through the G
subunits. Because we could
observe a correlation between half-maximal values from CRE-luciferase
and cAMP assays on the one hand and krox24-luciferase and MAPK assays
on the other, the difference observed for cannabinoid response of both
reporter systems is rather the result of the use of distinct signaling pathways
one mediated by the beta gamma subunits and the
other by the alpha subunit of the G protein. Our results
could account for a more potent coupling of CB2 to the alpha
subunit or indicate that the signal amplification is more efficient for
the cAMP pathway. The potency of the CRE-luciferase system makes it a
powerful tool to screen for cannabinoid receptor agonists, whereas
antagonists are more directly evidenced through the positively
regulated krox24 target.
Functional Properties of SR 144528.
We recently characterized
SR 144528 as a selective CB2 antagonist (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1998
).
Here, we investigated the effect of SR 144528 on CB2-mediated
functional responses by measuring reporter activities. As expected,
induction of the krox24 reporter by CP 55,940 is inhibited by SR 144528 in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas SR 144528 prevented the
inhibitory effect of CP 55,940 on FSK induction of CRE-luciferase.
These results are in line with previous those on MAPK activation and
modulation of cAMP levels (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1998
). Because most
cannabinoid receptor agonists are weakly selective or nonselective, SR
144528 thus represents a valuable tool as potent as SR 141716 for
evaluating the relative contribution of peripheral and central receptor
subtypes in cells coexpressing both receptors or in heterogeneous cell populations.
7 M SR 144528 and
a maximal 75% decrease after 20 h of treatment. Because the
half-life of luciferase (around 3 h) is significantly higher than
that of krox24 protein (less than 1 h), this can explain the
delayed response in reporter assay, although SR 144528 may act within
minutes for decoupling the receptor from the G protein. When
investigated on the cAMP pathway, SR 144528 stimulated FSK response,
which is consistent with the blocking of the
G
i-mediated inhibition of AC activity. A
correlation between basal cellular activity and GPCR expression was
originally described by the identification of activating point
mutations, either spontaneous or artificially engineered, or by
overexpressing receptors in mammalian or insect cells (Kenakin, 1996
9-THC induced receptor
desensitization. This result is in agreement with the expected effect
of an agonist, even if it exhibits a low intrinsic activity. On the
other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility that receptor
desensitization may be attributed to the antagonist potential of
9-THC. Also, there are few examples in the
literature; such a property was recently attributed to the antagonist
analog of cholecystokinin (Roettger et al., 1997| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank D. Shire, J. M. Derocq, and P. Carayon for helpful comments on the manuscript; C. Mas for technical help; and J. G. Monroe for providing the krox24 plasmid.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 10, 1998.
Received for publication March 18, 1998.
Send reprint requests to: Marielle Portier, Immunopharmacology Department of Sanofi Recherche, 371 rue du Pr. J. Blayac, 34184 Montpellier cedex 04, France. E-mail: marielle.portier{at}tls1.elfsanofi.fr.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
CB1, central
cannabinoid receptor;
CB2, peripheral cannabinoid receptor;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
CKL, CHO cells expressing krox24-luciferase;
CKL-CB2, CKL cells expressing CB2, CRE, cAMP responsive element;
CCL, CHO cells expressing CRE-luciferase, CCL-CB2, CCL cells expressing CB2;
RLU, relative light unit;
RLU, relative light unit;
PMA, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate;
AC, adenylyl cyclase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
9-THC,
9-tetrahydrocannabinol;
FSK, forskolin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
9-Tetrahydrocannabinol antagonizes the peripheral cannabinoid receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase.
J Biol Chem
271:
9902-9905
-adrenergic antagonists.
Mol Pharmacol
45:
490-499[Abstract].
2-adrenoceptor by sustained treatment with inverse agonists but not antagonists.
FEBS Lett
399:
108-112[Medline].
2-adrenoceptor in transfected neuroblastoma X glioma hybrid cells.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
1479-1486[Abstract].
-adrenergic receptor: Extending the ternary complex model.
J Biol Chem
90:
10365-10369.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. B. Springs, P. W. F. Karmaus, R. B. Crawford, B. L. F. Kaplan, and N. E. Kaminski Effects of targeted deletion of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 on immune competence and sensitivity to immune modulation by {Delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 84(6): 1574 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, P. Ma, W. Wang, R. B. Cole, and G. Wang IN VITRO METABOLISM OF DIARYLPYRAZOLES, A NOVEL GROUP OF CANNABINOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2005; 33(4): 508 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kenakin Efficacy as a Vector: the Relative Prevalence and Paucity of Inverse Agonism Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tripathy, K. Kleppinger-Sparace, R. A. Dixon, and K. D. Chapman N-Acylethanolamine Signaling in Tobacco Is Mediated by a Membrane-Associated, High-Affinity Binding Protein Plant Physiology, April 1, 2003; 131(4): 1781 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. McKallip, C. Lombard, M. Fisher, B. R. Martin, S. Ryu, S. Grant, P. S. Nagarkatti, and M. Nagarkatti Targeting CB2 cannabinoid receptors as a novel therapy to treat malignant lymphoblastic disease Blood, June 28, 2002; 100(2): 627 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Howlett, F. Barth, T. I. Bonner, G. Cabral, P. Casellas, W. A. Devane, C. C. Felder, M. Herkenham, K. Mackie, B. R. Martin, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 161 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Iwamura, H. Suzuki, Y. Ueda, T. Kaya, and T. Inaba In Vitro and in Vivo Pharmacological Characterization of JTE-907, a Novel Selective Ligand for Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 13, 2001; 296(2): 420 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Derocq, O. Jbilo, M. Bouaboula, M. Segui, C. Clere, and P. Casellas Genomic and Functional Changes Induced by the Activation of the Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor CB2 in the Promyelocytic Cells HL-60. POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF THE CB2 RECEPTOR IN CELL DIFFERENTIATION J. Biol. Chem., May 19, 2000; 275(21): 15621 - 15628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||