![]() |
|
|
Vol. 288, Issue 1, 286-294, January 1999
Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The in vitro actions were investigated of LY293111, a potent and selective leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor antagonist, on human neutrophils, human blood fractions, guinea pig lung membranes, and guinea pig parenchymal and tracheal strips. The IC50 for inhibiting [3H]LTB4 binding to human neutrophils was 17.6 ± 4.8 nM. LY293111 inhibited LTB4-induced human neutrophil aggregation (IC50 = 32 ± 5 nM), luminol-dependent chemiluminescence (IC50 = 20 ± 2 nM), chemotaxis (IC50 = 6.3 ± 1.7 nM), and superoxide production by adherent cells (IC50 = 0.5 nM). Corresponding responses induced by N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine were inhibited by 100-fold higher concentrations of LY293111. LTB4 binding to guinea pig tissues and subsequent activation were also inhibited. The Ki for inhibition of [3H]LTB4 binding to lung membranes was 7.1 ± 0.8 nM; IC50 for preventing binding of [3H]LTB4 to spleen membranes was 65 nM. The compound inhibited LTB4-induced contraction of guinea pig lung parenchyma. At 10 nM, LY293111 caused a parallel rightward shift of the LTB4 concentration-response curve. At higher concentrations, plots were shifted in a nonparallel manner, and maximum responses were depressed. LY293111 did not prevent antigen-stimulated contraction of sensitized trachea strips. At micromolar concentrations, LY293111 inhibited production of LTB4 and thromboxane B2 by plasma-depleted human blood stimulated with N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine and thrombin. In addition, at these higher concentrations, formation of LTB4 by A23187-activated whole blood and conversion of arachidonic acid to LTB4 by a human neutrophil cytosolic fraction were inhibited. In summary, LY293111 is a second-generation LTB4 receptor antagonist with much improved potency in a variety of functional assay systems.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leukotriene
B4 (LTB4) is a lipid
mediator initially described by Borgeat and Samuelsson (1979)
. Borgeat
and Naccache (1990)
reviewed studies on the biosynthesis and biological
activity of the molecule. The molecule, a dihydroxy acid derived from
arachidonic acid via the 5-lipoxygenase pathway, activates a number of
cell functions; most noteworthy is its ability to promote the
unidirectional movement of certain cells such as neutrophils and
eosinophils. Other activities include oxidant production, up-regulation
of the adhesive protein CD11b/CD18, secretion of hydrolytic enzymes from granules, enhanced production of suppressor cells, and stimulation of the synthesis and secretion of certain cytokines. Because of these
properties, it has been suggested that the eicosanoid may have a
pathophysiological role in many inflammatory and immunological diseases
such as psoriasis, various arthritides, inflammatory bowel disease,
asthma, and certain immunological diseases. The evidence for the role
of LTB4 in these diseases has been documented in
several reviews (Ford-Hutchinson, 1990
; Lewis et al., 1990
; Stenson,
1990
; Jackson and Fleisch, 1996
). The potential therapeutic value of
agents that block the actions of LTB4 has
stimulated several pharmaceutical companies to develop appropriate
antagonists (Sawyer, 1996
; Brooks and Summers, 1996
).
We reported on the development of two chemical classes of
LTB4 receptor antagonists: benzophenone
dicarboxylic acids (Gapinski et al., 1990a
,b
; Jackson et al., 1992
) and
hydroxyacetophenones (Herron et al., 1992
). Using inhibition of the
specific binding of radiolabeled LTB4 to isolated
intact human neutrophils as a marker of activity, we found
LY223982
[(E)-5-(3-carboxybenzoyl-2-[[6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-hexenyl]oxy]benzenepropanoic acid] (IC50 = 13.2 nM) and LY255283
(1-[5-ethyl-2-hydroxy-4-[[6-methyl-6-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)heptyl]oxy]phenyl]ethanone)(IC50 = 87 nM) to be the most potent compounds in their respective series. These agents also inhibited various cell functions activated by LTB4, although IC50 values
were generally 10- to 100-fold higher. Unfortunately, the compounds
were not very effective when administered orally to guinea pigs
undergoing airway obstruction induced by an i.v. injection of
LTB4. LY223982 had no effect when administered as
a single 30 mg/kg dose 2 h before the LTB4
challenge. At high doses (ED50 = 11 mg/kg),
LY225283 had some effect (Silbaugh et al., 1992
). Thus, because of the
poor oral bioavailability, the use of these compounds was restricted
primarily to topical application or i.v. injection. Neither route is
very useful for an anti-inflammatory drug that must be given
chronically. Consequently, we embarked on a program to develop
compounds that were more orally bioavailable and more potent in vitro
inhibitors of LTB4-induced cell functions. Initially, our efforts were directed toward modifications of LY223982 because of the two antagonists, it was the more potent in vitro. Xanthone dicarboxylic acids that mimicked different conformation states
of benzophenone dicarboxylic acids were evaluated, and one of these
(LY210073) was found to be a better inhibitor of LTB4-stimulated events than LY223982 (Chaney et
al., 1992
; Jackson et al., 1993
). It was, however, not active orally.
We then turned our attention to studying derivatives of LY255283. For
this approach, the molecule was divided conceptually into three
regions, a lipophilic region containing the 2-hydroxyacetophenone region, an acid region encompassing the tetrazole moiety, and a section
linking these two groups. The effect of modifications at either end of
the molecule was investigated. The structure-activity studies (Sawyer
et al., 1995
) eventually led to the discovery of LY293111 (Fig.
1), a compound more potent than LY255283
at selectively inhibiting LTB4-induced cellular
reactions and considerably more active when administered orally than
the first-generation antagonist. In this report are described
comparative in vitro studies of LY293111, LY255283, and another
first-generation LTB4 receptor antagonist,
SC-41930
(7-[3-(4-acetyl-3-methoxy-2-propylphenoxy)propoxy]3,4-dihydro-8-propyl-2H-1-benzopyran-2-carboxylic acid). In vivo studies on LY293111 will be presented in a later communication.
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals.
[3H]LTB4
(specific activity, 150-220 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham
(Arlington Heights, IL) or New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).
Nonradioactive LTB4 was obtained from BIOMOL (Plymouth
Meeting, PA). A23187
(6S-[6
(2S*,3S*),8
(R*),9
,11
]5-(methylamino)-2-[[3,9,11-trimethyl-8-[1-methyl-2-oxo-2-(1H-pyrrol-2yl)ethyl]1,7-dioxaspirol[5.5]undec-2-yl]methyl]4-benzoxazolecarboxylic acid),
ATP,
N,N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid (BES), bovine serum albumin, cytochalasin B,
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA),
N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine
(fMLP), 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid,
piperazine-N,N'-bis[2-ethanesulfonic acid] (PIPES), Tris·HCl, and superoxide dismutase were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Inhibition of [3H]LTB4 Binding to Human
Neutrophils.
The effectiveness of compounds to inhibit binding of
LTB4 to human neutrophils was measured with a radioligand
binding assay. Heparinized venous blood was drawn from normal
volunteers, and neutrophils were isolated by standard techniques of
Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation, dextran 70 sedimentation, and hypotonic
lysis. Cell preparations were
90% viable neutrophils. The binding
assay was carried out in silanized 12 × 75-mm glass tubes by
adding in the following order: 10 µl of DMSO containing different
amounts of antagonist, 20 µl of radioligand (2.65 nM
[3H]LTB4), and 500 µl of cells suspended in
Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 0.1% ovalbumin (2 × 107 cells/ml). Tubes were incubated at 4°C for 10 min,
and the reaction was terminated by isolating the cells with a Brandel
MB-48R harvester (Gaithersburg, MD). Radioactivity bound to the cells
was measured by scintillation spectrometry. Nonspecific binding was
determined by measuring the amount of label bound when a greater than
2000-fold excess of nonradioactive ligand was added. Appropriate
corrections for nonspecific binding were made when analyzing the data.
The concentration of DMSO in the incubation mixture (1.9%) had no effect on the binding of radioligands. The amount of
[3H]LTB4 added (0.1 nM) was only 4% of the
IC50 for nonlabeled LTB4 so that
IC50 values obtained are nearly identical with
Ki values for the high affinity
LTB4 receptor.
Inhibition of LTB4-Induced Human Neutrophil Chemotaxis. Studies were carried out using chemotaxis chambers with a 200-µl blind-end stimulus compartment and fitted with 3 µM polyvinylpyrrolidone-free polycarbonate membranes (Poretics Corporation, Livermore, CA). Human polymorphonuclear leukocytes were isolated from citrated venous blood drawn from normal volunteers and resuspended at a density of 12 × 106 cells/ml in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, supplemented with 0.6 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 2.0 mM glucose, and 0.05% human serum albumin. The same buffer was used to make stock solutions of LTB4 (20 nM) and antagonists. Equal amounts of a particular stock solution of antagonist and chemotactic agent were mixed, and 200 µl was added to the lower compartment. Equal parts of the human neutrophil suspension and the stock antagonist solution were mixed, and 0.8 ml was added to the upper compartment. Thus, the final concentration of LTB4 in the lower compartment was 10 nM, and a total of 4.8 × 106 neutrophils were added to the upper compartment. The chemotaxis chambers were then incubated for 90 min at 37°C. The number of cells that migrated completely through the filter and dropped into the lower compartment was determined with the use of a Sequoia-Turner Cell-Dyn 900 counter (Mountain View, CA). Cells that passed through the filter by chemotaxis were calculated by subtracting, from the total migrated cells, the number that moved by random motion.
Inhibition of Superoxide Production by Adherent Human
Neutrophils.
Cell suspensions in phenol-red-free Hanks' balanced
salt solution containing bovine serum albumin (1 mg/ml) were added in 80-µl aliquots (2 × 105 neutrophils/well) to
96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA).
Subsequently, 100-µl aliquots of a ferricytochrome c
solution (2.97 mg/ml) in Hanks' balanced salt solution were added to
each well containing neutrophils. Ten microliters of test compound at
various concentrations were added to each well followed by the addition
of 10 µl of stimulant (either LTB4 or fMLP). The plates
were incubated at 37°C for 30 min after addition of neutrophil
stimulant. Absorbance at 550 nM was determined on a micro-ELISA reader
(model MR600; Dynatech Laboratories, Alexander, VA). The reference
wavelength was set at 490 nm to compensate for changes in absorbance
due to the presence of cells (Rajkovic and Williams, 1985
). The
specificity of the cytochrome c reduction was controlled
by the inclusion in some sample wells of superoxide dismutase (300 U/ml, final concentration). Compounds were initially dissolved in
dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and then diluted to the desired strength. The
concentration of DMSO in the wells never exceeded 0.3%. The results
were expressed in nanomoles of cytochrome c reduced per
1 × 106 neutrophils after subtraction of absorbance
readings for wells containing superoxide dismutase.
Inhibition of LTB4- and fMLP-Induced Chemiluminescence and Aggregation of Human Neutrophils. A platelet ionized calcium aggregometer (Chrono-log Corporation, Havertown, PA) was used to measure chemiluminescence and aggregation of peripheral human neutrophils. Cells (1 × 107/ml) suspended in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium, pH 7.4 (450 µl), were placed in a siliconized cuvette. Cytochalasin B (4.5 µl, 200 µg/ml) was added, and the contents were stirred at 900 rpm and 37°C. After 2 min, antagonist (4.5 µl) was injected into the cuvette. Calcium and magnesium ions (4.5 µl, 100 mM Ca++, 50 mM Mg++) were then added. After another minute, luminol (4.5 µl, 100 µM) and LTB4 or fMLP (4.5 µl, 3 µM) were injected into the cuvette, and the subsequent maximum amount of response occurring was measured with the aid of a Compaq 386/20e computer and software supplied by Chrono-log Corporation. The final concentration of LTB4 and fMLP was 30 nM. Corrections were made for nonspecific chemiluminescence and aggregation occurring in the absence of agonist.
Inhibition of [3H]LTB4 Binding to
Guinea Pig Lung Membranes.
Incubations (555 µl) were performed
for 45 min at 30°C in polypropylene minitubes, which contained 25 µg of guinea pig lung membrane protein (Saussy et al., 1991
), in a
buffer consisting of 25 mM
3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid, 10 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 6.5, approximately 140 pM [3H]LTB4, and displacing ligand or vehicle
(0.1% DMSO in 1 mM Na2CO3, final
concentration) as appropriate. The binding reaction was terminated by
the addition of 1 ml of ice-cold wash buffer (25 mM Tris · HCl, pH
7.5), followed immediately by vacuum filtration over Whatman GF/C
glass-fiber filters, using a Brandel (Gaithersburg, MD) 48 place
harvester. The filters were washed five times with 1 ml of wash buffer.
Retained radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting
at 50% counting efficiency using Ready Protein Plus cocktail (Beckman,
Fullerton, CA). Nondisplaceable binding was determined in the presence
of 1 µM nonradioactive LTB4 and was usually less than
10% of total binding. Data were analyzed using linear regression
analysis of log-logit plots of the values between 10% and 90% of
control binding to calculate IC50 values and slope factors
(pseudo-Hill coefficients). IC50 values thus obtained were
used to calculate Ki values according to the
method of Cheng and Prusoff (1973)
.
Inhibition of [3H]LTB4 Binding to Guinea Pig Spleen Membranes. Guinea pig spleen LTB4 receptor binding kits were obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Displacement of [3H]LTB4 was performed as outlined in the instructions using the supplied reagents. Briefly, 25 µl each of [3H]LTB4 and varying concentrations of LY293111 were incubated with 200 µl of guinea pig spleen LTB4 receptor preparation for 2 h. Bound [3H]LTB4 was separated from free by vacuum filtration, and the Ki for LY293111 was calculated. All steps were carried out at 4°C.
Inhibition of LTB4-Induced Lung Parenchyma
Contraction.
Male Hartley guinea pigs were killed by
CO2 suffocation and subsequent decapitation. Lungs were
excised and perfused through the pulmonary artery with
Krebs-bicarbonate solution of 118.2 mM NaCl, 4.6 mM KCl, 2.5 mM
CaCl2 · 2H2O, 1.2 mM MgSO4 · 7H2O, 24.8 mM NaHCO3, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, and 10.0 mM dextrose. Strips of parenchyma were removed from the outer edge of the lung, and the ends
were secured by cotton thread. The tissues were then placed in 10-ml
organ baths under a passive force of 0.5g. Temperature was maintained at 37°C, and the Krebs-bicarbonate solution was aerated with 95% O2/5% CO2. Tissues were
equilibrated for at least 1 h before the start of the experiment.
Contractions were then induced by increasing concentrations of
LTB4 with a washout and 30-min rest period interposed
between administrations of the agonist. Contractions were measured
isometrically with a Grass FTO3C force-displacement transducer and
recorded on a Grass polygraph as changes in g of force.
The procedure essentially followed that of Drazen and Schneider (1978)
.
In addition, contractile responses to LTD4, histamine, carbachol, and U46619 were elicited using the cumulation concentration technique of van Rossum (1963)
. After a control concentration-response curve to each agonist was obtained, the parenchyma was then incubated with LY293111 for 45 min followed by a final concentration-response profile to the respective agonist.
Effect of LY293111 on Antigen-Induced Contractions of Guinea Pig
Tracheal Strips.
Male Hartley strain guinea pigs (200-250 g) were
actively sensitized by three 10 mg/kg injections of ovalbumin over a
5-day period, and experiments with tracheal tissue from these animals were performed 21 to 26 days later. On the day of the experiment, guinea pigs were killed by cervical dislocation, and tracheae were
removed, cleaned of surrounding connective tissue, and cut into spiral
strips. Each strip was divided in half for paired experiments. Tissues
were placed in 10-ml jacketed tissue baths maintained at 37°C and
attached with cotton thread to Grass force-displacement transducers
(FTO3C). Changes in isometric tension were displayed on a Grass
polygraph (model 7D). Tracheal strips were bathed in modified
Krebs-bicarbonate solution of 118.2 mM NaCl, 4.6 mM KCl, 2.5 mM
CaCl2 · 2H2O, 1.2 mM MgSO4 · 7H2O, 24.8 mM NaHCO3, 1.0 mM
KH2PO4, and 10.0 mM dextrose. The buffer also
contained indomethacin (5 µM), which potentiated the contraction of
the cysteinyl leukotrienes by removing the influence of cyclooxygenase
products. The tissue baths were aerated with 95% O2/5%
CO2. Strips were placed under a resting tension of
2g, and the tissues were allowed a minimal stabilization
period of 60 min before undergoing experimentation. Bath fluid was
changed at 15-min intervals during the stabilization period. Initially,
tissues were challenged with carbachol (10 µM) after the 60-min
stabilization period to ensure tissue viability. After recording the
maximal response to the initial carbachol challenge, the tissues were
washed and reequilibrated for 60 min before starting the experimental
protocol. Cumulative concentration-response curves were obtained from
tracheal strips by increasing the ovalbumin concentration in the organ
bath by half-log10 increments while the previous
concentration remained in contact with the tissues (van Rossum, 1963
).
Agonist concentration was increased after reaching the plateau of the
contraction elicited by the preceding concentration. One
concentration-response curve was obtained from each tissue. The paired
tissue strips received either LY293111 (10 µM) or vehicle (DMSO) 30 min before starting the cumulative concentration-response curves. To
minimize variability between tissues, contractile responses were
expressed as a percentage of the maximal response obtained with
carbachol (10 µM), added to the bath at the end of the
concentration-response curve.
Inhibition of Eicosanoid Production by Plasma-Depleted Human
Blood.
Ten milliliters of blood were collected in EDTA (final
concentration, 1.5 mg/ml). Then, 40 ml of glucose-phosphate buffer was
added, and the suspension was centrifuged at 900g for 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant fluid was discarded, and the
cells were washed once with 50 ml of glucose-phosphate buffer before
resuspending them in 50 ml of Krebs-Ringer-Henseleit buffer containing
0.1% gelatin, 1 mM CaCl2, and 1.1 mM MgCl2.
Working solutions of LY293111 were made by dissolving the compound in DMSO at 10 mM and diluting it with appropriate amounts of
Krebs-Ringer-Henseleit buffer. An agonist solution was made containing
1 µM fMLP and 10 units/ml of thrombin in Krebs-Ringer-Henseleit
buffer. The blood cell suspension was first warmed at 37°C for 5 min.
For each milliliter of suspension, 2 µl of cytochalasin B solution (2 mg/ml in DMSO) was then added. Experiments were carried out using
polypropylene 96-well plates (1 ml well volume). In each well, 200 µl
of an appropriate LY293111 solution or buffer was incubated with 250 µl of the blood cell/cytochalasin B suspension at 37°C for 10 min.
Stimulation of eicosanoid production was begun by adding 50 µl of the
agonist solution. The mixture was then incubated for 2 min before
stopping the reaction by adding 50 µl of a reagent containing 25 mM
EDTA, 10 µM indomethacin, and 10 µM concentration of the
5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, LY280810 (Cho et al., 1993
). Subsequently,
the plate was centrifuged, and an aliquot of the supernatant fluid was
removed for analysis of the eicosanoid content. On standing for 1 to
3 h after the centrifugation step, there was a slight amount of
red cell hemolysis in the cell pellet when the incubation mixture
contained the highest concentration of LY293111 (10 µM) tested.
However, this did not interfere with the assay for eicosanoid
production because the supernatant fluid samples were removed
immediately after centrifugation before the hemolysis occurred. The
amount of LTB4 and TxB2 produced was determined by the use of a competitive enzyme immunoassay. The IC50
for inhibition of each eicosanoid was determined using blood cells from
three individuals and averaging the values.
Inhibition of Eicosanoid Production in Whole Human Blood.
Venous blood was collected into heparin, and a 1-ml aliquot was
incubated with LY293111 for 10 min at 37°C. Eicosanoid production was
initiated with the addition of either A23187 (20 µg/ml) alone or in
the presence of 150 µM arachidonic acid. The reaction was allowed to
proceed for an additional 10 min at 37°C and terminated by
centrifugation at 4°C. The resultant plasma eicosanoid levels were
determined by direct enzyme-linked immunoassay of plasma (Spaethe et
al., 1992
).
Inhibition of LTB4 Formation by Human Neutrophil
Cytosol.
Peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated by density
centrifugation as previously described (Marder et al., 1992
). The cells then were washed twice in buffer (10 mM PIPES, 10 mM BES, and 1 mM
EDTA, pH 6.8), diluted to 2.5 × 107 cells/ml and
disrupted by sonication. The resulting material was subsequently
centrifuged at 20,000g for 20 min at 4°C, and the
supernatant fluid was stored at
70°C until assayed. For testing inhibitory activity, different amounts of LY293111 were added to 150 µl of the cytosol diluted 1:3 (v/v) with assay buffer (10 mM PIPES,
10 mM BES, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1.56 mM ATP, and 2.5 mM
CaCl2, pH 6.8). LTB4 synthesis was initiated by
adding 50 µl of a solution of arachidonic acid (final concentration, 3 µM). After a 5-min incubation at 37°C, the reaction was
terminated by the addition of 50 µl of 500 mM EDTA. LTB4
was determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay using reagents and assay
procedures obtained from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inhibition of Specific Binding of [3H]LTB4 to Human Neutrophils. The effect of LY293111 on binding of radioactive LTB4 to its receptors on intact human neutrophils was compared with that of LY255283 and another LTB4 antagonist, SC-41930, as well as nonradioactive LTB4 (Fig. 2). The respective IC50 values for the three receptor antagonists were 17.6 ± 4.8 nM for LY293111, 41.3 ± 3.1 nM for SC-41930, and 85.1 ± 7.9 nM for LY255283. Thus, LY293111 is 2.3- and 4.8-fold more potent than SC-41930 and LY255283, respectively, and only 3.8-fold less potent than the homologous ligand (IC50 = 4.6 ± 0.6 nM).
|
Inhibition of Chemotaxis of Human Neutrophils. Figure 3 shows the ability of the three antagonists to inhibit the migration of human neutrophils toward 10 nM LTB4. LY293111 was considerably more effective at preventing cell movement than the other two compounds. The IC50 for LY293111 (6.3 ± 1.7 nM) was 600 times lower than the corresponding value for SC-41930 (3.8 ± 0.8 µM). LY255283 was the poorest inhibitor of the three (IC50 = 7.2 µM). At 10 µM or less in concentration, LY293111 had no chemotactic activity.
|
Prevention of Oxidant Production by Human Neutrophils. The activity of the antagonists on secretion of reactive oxygen species by stimulated cells was studied in two systems. In the first, the effect of the compounds on the delayed secretion of superoxide anion by adherent neutrophils activated by 1 nM LTB4 was measured. LY293111 was a very potent inhibitor in this assay (IC50 = 0.5 nM), being more than 1500-fold greater than that for SC-41930 (IC50 = 784 nM). In the other oxidant-producing system, continuously agitated suspended cells were activated with 30 nM LTB4 or fMLP, and the rate of formation of luminol-dependent chemiluminescence was measured. LY293111 was a very strong antagonist of this reaction (IC50 = 20 ± 2 nM) when the cells were activated with LTB4 (Fig. 4). In contrast, when cells were activated with fMLP, the compound was more than 2 orders of magnitude less inhibitory (IC50 = 4.5 ± 0.5 µM). LY293111 alone at 10 µM did not induce any oxidant production.
|
Inhibition of Homotypic Aggregation of Human Neutrophils. Both LY293111 and LY255283 inhibited LTB4-induced aggregation of human neutrophils (Fig. 5). However, LY293111 (IC50 = 32 ± 5 nM) was a 4-fold more potent antagonist than LY255283 (IC50 = 125 nM). Neither compound greatly inhibited aggregation induced by fMLP. The IC50 for LY293111 using the peptide as the aggregating agent was 11.0 ± 6.4 µM, whereas the corresponding value for LY255283 was a value greater than 10 µM because the compound inhibited only 30% of the fMLP-induced response at this concentration. At 10 µM or less in concentration, LY293111 did not induce aggregation of neutrophils.
|
Effects on LTB4-Induced Responses with Guinea Pig Lung
and Spleen Membranes and Strips of Parenchyma and Trachea.
Before
carrying out in vivo studies in guinea pigs with LY293111, experiments
were done in vitro to determine whether the compound was as effective
at antagonizing LTB4 activation of guinea pig cells as it
was at arresting such events with human cells. Figure
6 shows that the compound inhibited very
effectively binding of radioactive LTB4 to guinea pig lung
membranes. The Ki calculated from this data
was 7.1 ± 0.8 nM (n = 40). Thus, the
second-generation compound was a 14-fold more potent inhibitor than
LY255283 (Ki = 100 nM; Silbaugh et al.,
1992
). For reference, the corresponding Ki
for nonradioactive LTB4 was 0.12 ± 0.01 nM
(n = 121). In addition to these studies with lung
membranes, the compound also inhibited binding of radiolabeled
LTB4 to guinea pig spleen membranes (IC50 = 65 nM; n = 2). LY293111 was also evaluated for its
ability to block LTB4-evoked contractions of lung
parenchyma strips. At 10 nM, the compound caused a parallel rightward
shift of the LTB4 concentration-response curve, suggesting
competitive inhibition at this concentration with a
pKB value of 8.69 ± 0.16 (Fig.
7). At higher concentrations, however,
the curves were shifted in a nonparallel fashion, suggesting that
either noncompetitive inhibition or slow dissociation from the receptor
was occurring. Silbaugh et al. (1992)
reported that LY255283, when
tested in a similar fashion, was a competitive inhibitor with a
pA2 value of 7.17. Thus, in this tissue system, LY293111 is
a more potent antagonist than LY255283 by 1 order of magnitude. At 1 µM, the compound had no effect on contractions induced with
LTD4, histamine, carbachol, and the thromboxane
A2 (TxA2) mimetic agent U46619. Incubation of
ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pig tracheal strips with 10 µM LY293111
for 30 min failed to alter the cumulative concentration-response curve
obtained on challenging the tissue with increasing concentrations of
ovalbumin (Fig. 8). This shows that
antagonism of LTB4 receptors by LY293111 did not influence
the antigen-triggered formation of cysteinyl leukotrienes and the
subsequent contractions of guinea pig trachea strips induced by this
class of leukotrienes.
|
|
|
Inhibition of Eicosanoid Production. Experiments were conducted to determine whether LY293111 could inhibit the synthesis of either 5-lipoxygenase or cyclooxygenase products. The initial test system investigated was one in which LTB4 and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) were synthesized by plasma-depleted human blood in which the cells were stimulated with 100 nM fMLP and 1 unit/ml thrombin. LY293111 inhibited formation of both eicosanoids. The IC50 for inhibition of LTB4 synthesis was 1.1 ± 0.5 µM, whereas the corresponding value for preventing TxB2 formation was 2.4 ± 0.1 µM. We also determined the effect of LY293111 on eicosanoid production in the presence of plasma. Whole blood was stimulated with A23187 alone or in the presence of 150 µM arachidonic acid. At high concentrations of LY293111, a dose-dependent reduction in LTB4 production occurred whether cells were stimulated only with A23187 (IC50 = 13.7 ± 6.6 µM; n = 3) or both A23187 and arachidonic acid (IC50 = 28.4 ± 15.1 µM; n = 3). In contrast to the results obtained with plasma-depleted blood, no reduction in TxB2 was observed at concentrations as high as 100 µM when whole blood was stimulated with the ionophore with or without the addition of arachidonic acid. To further explore the mechanism of inhibition of LTB4 release, a cytosolic fraction was prepared from human neutrophils, and the effect of LY293111 on LTB4 formation from arachidonic acid was determined. The compound inhibited at high concentrations. Using substrate concentrations of 1 and 3 µM arachidonic acid, the IC50 values were 0.63 ± 0.016 µM and 0.74 ± 0.11 µM, respectively (n = 3).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main objective of this study was to develop a selective
LTB4 receptor antagonist that was a more potent
inhibitor of cell functions activated by the lipid mediator than either
of our first-generation compounds, LY223982 and LY255283. The new
antagonist, LY293111, was far superior to them at blocking neutrophil
functions stimulated by LTB4. It inhibited
LTB4-induced chemotaxis more than 950-fold better
than the other two compounds and was a 2- to 4-fold better inhibitor of
LTB4-induced neutrophil aggregation. The compound was a very effective inhibitor of oxidant production by
LTB4-activated cells. LY293111 was at least 3 orders of magnitude more potent than LY255283 (Schultz et al., 1991
) at
preventing prolonged oxidant production by neutrophils that had been
allowed to adhere and spread out onto a plastic surface. In addition,
the new antagonist also strongly inhibited oxidant production when
LTB4 was added to suspended neutrophils. In this
test in the absence of an inhibitor a short respiratory burst occurred
during the first few minutes of reaction before the cells have had an
opportunity to adhere to any kind of a surface.
Specificity studies indicated that LY293111 was also very selective. The IC50 values for inhibiting both respiratory burst and aggregation of human neutrophils induced by fMLP were more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than corresponding values from LTB4-induced responses.
LTB4 receptors on human neutrophils exist in both
high and low affinity states (Goldman and Goetzl, 1984
). Chemotaxis,
adherence, and aggregation are functions mediated by activation of high
affinity receptors; degranulation and superoxide production are
expressed on stimulation of low affinity receptors. The inhibition of
both chemotaxis and the respiratory burst of suspended cells induced with LTB4 by LY293111 indicated that the compound
bound to both receptor states.
LY293111 inhibited LTB4-stimulated contraction of
lung parenchyma strips from guinea pigs. The nature of this inhibition, however, varied with concentration. At 10 nM, LY293111 caused a
parallel displacement of the agonist concentration-response curve to
the right with no depression of the maximal response. These results are
consistent with reversible competitive binding of LY293111 and
LTB4 at the same receptor. At higher
concentrations, a nonparallel shift of the agonist
concentration-response plot with a concomitant lowering of the maximal
response was observed, suggesting either reversible noncompetitive or
irreversible inhibition. LTB4 contracts
parenchyma by an indirect mechanism dependent on formation of
myotropic cyclooxygenase products, chiefly TxA2. Indomethacin and other cyclooxygenase inhibitors block the reaction (Sirois et al., 1985
). At high micromolar concentrations, LY293111 inhibited synthesis of TxB2 in experiments where
plasma-depleted human blood was stimulated with thrombin
(IC50 = 2.4 µM). This raised the question of
whether LY293111 inhibited the LTB4-induced parenchyma contractions not by binding to the
LTB4 receptor but by preventing the synthesis or
binding of TxA2 at its receptor. This seems
unlikely. The concentrations of LY293111 tested on the parenchyma were
10 to 300 nM. These amounts would have been too low to have inhibited
much thromboxane formation. In addition, at 1 µM, LY293111 did not
inhibit contractions caused by LTD4. Approximately 40 to 50% of the response induced by this eicosanoid is
also due to the formation of TxA2 (Sirois et al.,
1985
). The compound also at 1 µM did not inhibit contractions induced
by the thromboxane mimetic U46619, indicating that LY293111 did not bind to the thromboxane receptor. A possible explanation for the noncompetitive inhibition of LTB4-induced
contractions seen at LY293111 concentrations higher than 10 nM could be
a very strong bonding of the compound to the guinea pig
LTB4 receptor. Spaethe and Froelich (unpublished
observations) found that isolated human neutrophils exposed to 0.3 to
1.0 µM LY293111 and then extensively washed could no longer bind
[3H]LTB4 at the
LTB4 receptor. A similar tight binding of the
compound to guinea pig receptors at the higher nanomolar concentrations may be occurring in the lung parenchyma strip.
Although LY223982 and LY293111 had similar IC50 values for inhibition of LTB4 binding, the latter compound was a considerably stronger inhibitor of LTB4-induced chemotaxis. Similar dissociation of potencies in different assays have been observed for other LTB4 receptor antagonists. There are several possible reasons for these results. Perhaps LY293111 bound better to the high affinity receptors involved in the chemotactic process, whereas LY223982 bound preferentially to the low affinity receptor. A second possible reason might be that LY293111 has LTB4-specific inhibitory activities on chemotaxis other than just that of antagonizing the LTB4 receptor, whereas LY223982 does not. Finally, the chemotaxis assay was conducted in a buffer containing 0.05% human serum albumin, whereas [3H]LTB4 binding studies were carried out in an environment of 0.1% ovalbumin. The two compounds may have very different binding characteristics to serum albumin, and this may account for the differences in their activity in the chemotaxis assay.
At micromolar concentrations, LY293111 blocked synthesis of eicosanoid products. When plasma-depleted human blood was stimulated with fMLP and thrombin, both syntheses of LTB4 and TxB2 were inhibited by LY293111. In contrast, when cells in whole blood were activated with A23187, only LTB4 production was inhibited. Further studies are needed to determine how eicosanoid formation is being inhibited. At these high concentrations, the compound inhibited formation of LTB4 on incubation of human neutrophil cytosol with arachidonic acid, but this could have been a nonspecific cation chelating effect on LTB4-forming enzymes. The major action of the compound is that of selectively antagonizing the LTB4 receptor at nanomolar concentrations
Several other potent second-generation LTB4 receptor antagonists have been disclosed in recent years. Shown in Table 1 are the reported activities of these compounds as well as LY293111 at inhibiting LTB4 binding to intact human neutrophils and preventing activation of polymorphonuclear leukocyte cell functions by the dihydroxy leukotriene. In addition, the effectiveness of each compound when administered orally to abrogate in vivo phenomena induced by LTB4 is also given. Comparisons of this nature are not easy to make because different laboratories do not necessarily carry out a particular assay or in vivo study under identical conditions. Nevertheless, some general conclusions can be drawn. All of the other compounds were better antagonists of LTB4 binding than LY293111. Some, such as SC-53228 and SB-209247, were more than 10-fold greater in potency. On the other hand, in LTB4-activated cell assays, LY293111 was in many cases either equipotent or considerably more inhibitory. The one exception was CGS-25019C, which in most in vitro cell tests was a more potent inhibitor than LY293111. These results again show the lack of correlation between inhibition of receptor binding and receptor activation, suggesting that some of these compounds may have regulatory effects on receptor activation. The effect, however, is apparently selective for LTB4-activated cellular events because, where investigated, these compounds either inhibited very weakly or not at all cellular events induced by other agonists. It is somewhat more difficult to draw generalizations from comparisons of in vivo results because of differences in species, type of test, and presumed variations in the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of each compound. Nevertheless, LY293111 and SC-53228 appear to be more potent at inhibiting LTB4-stimulated responses in vivo than the other compounds.
|
In addition to the cell responses described herein that are selectively
inhibited by LY293111, Marder et al. (1995)
reported that the compound
also selectively blocked LTB4-induced calcium mobilization and up-regulation of CD11b/CD18 on isolated human neutrophils. The latter finding has been used to develop an ex vivo
assay for measuring the pharmacodynamics of the compound on dosing
subjects orally (Marder et al., 1996
). Efficacy results with this test,
which is based on incubating samples of venous blood with 10 nM
LTB4 and measuring the amount of CD11b
up-regulation by flow cytometry, have been shown to correlate well with
immunohistochemical analyses of skin biopsies (van Pelt et al., 1997
).
The ease of operation of this assay is allowing clinical studies to be
carried out to determine the usefulness of LY293111 as a therapeutic
agent for treatment of inflammation disorders.
In conclusion, these in vitro studies reveal that LY293111 is a selective LTB4 receptor antagonist with greatly improved potency in cell function assays over first-generation antagonists. Coupled with results showing potent activity in vivo on oral administration (S. M. Silbaugh and P. W. Stengel, unpublished observations), this agent should prove useful in defining the role of LTB4 in inflammatory diseases.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 17, 1998.
Received for publication May 13, 1998.
1 Present address: Glaxo Research Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
2 Present address: Intercardia Research Laboratories, 8 Cedar Brook Dr., Cranbury, NJ 08512.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. William T. Jackson, Cardiovascular Research, MC-304, Drop Code 0524, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285. E-mail: wtj{at}lilly.com.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
LTB4, leukotriene B4;
A23187, 6S-[6
(2S*,3S*),8
(R*),9
,11
]5-(methylamino)-2-[[3,9,11-trimethyl-8-[1-methyl-2-oxo-2(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)ethyl]1,7-dioxaspirol[5.5]undec-2-yl]methyl]4-benzoxazolecarboxylic acid;
BES, N,N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid;
DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide;
EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid;
fMLP, N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine;
[3H]LTB4, [5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15(n)-3H]leukotriene B4;
LTD4, leukotriene D4;
LY255283, 1-[5-ethyl-2-hydroxy-4-[[6-methyl-6-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)heptyl]oxy]phenyl]ethanone;
LY293111, 2-[2-propyl-3-[3-[2-ethyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-
hydroxyphenoxy]propoxy]phenoxy]benzoic acid;
PIPES, piperazine-N,N'-bis[2-ethanesulfonic
acid];
SC-41930, 7-[3-(4-acetyl-3-methoxy-2-propylphenoxy)propoxy]3,4-dihydro-8-propyl-2H-1-benzopyran-2-carboxylic
acid;
TxA2, thromboxane A2;
TxB2, thromboxane B2;
U46619, 15(S)-hydroxy-11
,9
-(epoxymethano)prosta-5Z,13E-dienoic
acid.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Einstein, H. Jordan, W. Zhou, M. Brenner, E. G. Moses, and S. B. Liggett Alternative splicing of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily in human airway smooth muscle diversifies the complement of receptors PNAS, April 1, 2008; 105(13): 5230 - 5235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. McHugh, R. S. McMaster, R. G. Pertwee, S. Roy, A. Mahadevan, R. K. Razdan, and R. A. Ross Novel Compounds That Interact with Both Leukotriene B4 Receptors and Vanilloid TRPV1 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 955 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Schwartz, A. Weitzman, E. O'Reilly, L. Brail, D. P. de Alwis, A. Cleverly, B. Barile-Thiem, V. Vinciguerra, and D. R. Budman Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of LY293111, an Orally Bioavailable LTB4 Receptor Antagonist, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2005; 23(23): 5365 - 5373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-G. Tong, X.-Z. Ding, R. Hennig, R. C. Witt, J. Standop, P. M. Pour, and T. E. Adrian Leukotriene B4 Receptor Antagonist LY293111 Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3232 - 3242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yokomizo, K. Kato, K. Terawaki, T. Izumi, and T. Shimizu A Second Leukotriene B4 Receptor, BLT2: A New Therapeutic Target in Inflammation and Immunological Disorders J. Exp. Med., August 8, 2000; 192(3): 421 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang, E. Gustafson, L. Pang, X. Qiao, J. Behan, M. Maguire, M. Bayne, and T. Laz A Novel Hepatointestinal Leukotriene B4 Receptor. CLONING AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2000; 275(52): 40686 - 40694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||