![]() |
|
|
Vol. 287, Issue 3, 1038-1047, December 1998
Sanofi Recherche, 371 rue du Professeur J. Blayac, 34184 Montpellier CEDEX 04, France
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have investigated the adaptive changes of the human central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-CB1), after agonist (CP 55,940) or selective CB1 inverse agonist (SR 141716) treatment. CB1 receptor density and affinity constant as measured by binding assays with both tritiated ligands remained essentially unchanged after varying period exposure of CHO-CB1 cells (from 30 min to 72 hr) to saturating concentrations of CP 55,940 or SR 141716. However, using a C-myc-tagged version of the CB1 receptor, FACS analysis and confocal microscopy studies on CB1 expression indicated that the agonist promoted a disappearance of cell surface receptor although inverse agonist increased its cell surface density. Taken together these results suggest that 1) agonist induces internalization of the receptor into a cellular compartment that would be still accessible to both the hydrophobic ligands CP 55,940 or SR 141716; 2) inverse-agonist promotes externalization of the receptor from an intracellular preexisting pool to the cell surface. In parallel, we also investigated the associated effects of CP 55,940 and SR 141716 on CB1 receptor-coupled second messengers. We showed that preexposure of cells to CP 55,940 induced a rapid desensitization of the CB1 to the agonist response. The ability of CP 55,940 to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase and to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase activity was dramatically reduced. By striking contrast, SR 141716 pretreatment of CHO-CB1 cells not only had no significant effect on the potency of CP 55,940 to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase but also induced a significant enhancement of the CP 55,940 ability to stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. These results suggest that the modulation of the number of cell surface receptor could lead to functional desensitization or sensitization of the CB1 receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It
is now well established that
9-THC (the main active
principle of marijuana), anandamide (an endogenous ligand) (Devane et al., 1992
) and synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
mediate their cellular effects through specific cannabinoid receptors belonging to the large multigene superfamily of the GPCR. To date, two
human cannabinoid receptor cDNAs have been identified, designated CB1
and CB2 (Matsuda et al., 1990
, Munro et al.,
1993
). Two splice variants of CB1 mRNA (CB1 and CB1A) have been
described in human and rat brain (Shire et al., 1995
).
Although CB1 mRNA is predominantly expressed in the brain (Matsuda
et al., 1990
, Westlake et al., 1994
), it has also
been detected in testis (Gérard et al., 1991
), spleen
cells (Kaminski et al., 1992
) and in leukocytes (Bouaboula et al., 1993
). By contrast the CB2 subtype has not been
detected in the brain, but found remarkably abundant in immune tissues (Galiègue et al., 1995
, Derocq et al.,
1995
), and may account for cannabinoid-mediated immune responses. Both
receptors mediate their effects via a pertussis toxin-sensitive
GTP-binding regulatory protein Gi. Upon stimulation, both CB1 and CB2
induced the inhibition of AC (Howlett and Fleming, 1984
, Slipetz
et al., 1995
, Felder et al., 1995
) and the
activation of the MAPK (Bouaboula et al., 1995a
, 1996
). In
neurons, CB1 has been found to be associated with the inhibition of
N-type (Mackie and Hille, 1992
) or P/Q-type (Twitchell et
al., 1997
) calcium channels. In addition, CB1 activation has
recently been shown to induce immediate-early gene expression such as
Krox 24 through a cAMP-independent pathway (Bouaboula et al., 1995b
). These central cannabinoid receptor-mediated
effects were all prevented by the potent and selective CB1 receptor
antagonist SR 141716 (RinaldiCarmona et al., 1994
,
1995
, 1996
). There is now substantial evidences showing that for some
GPCRs, antagonists induce effects that are opposite to those observed
by agonists, thereby displaying negative intrinsic activity. This
referring to inverse agonism (Lefkowitz et al., 1993
,
Kenakin, 1996
). Such an effect was recently demonstrated for the
selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 (Landsman et
al., 1997
, Bouaboula et al., 1997
) that is therefore
defined as an inverse agonist.
It is clearly established that the functionality and the expression of
the GPCRs are dynamically regulated after agonist or antagonist
exposure. Indeed it has often been observed that cell exposure to
agonist causes the desensitization and a down-regulation of the
receptors, whereas antagonist treatment leads to their up-regulation.
Several in vivo studies have also demonstrated the same
behavior for cannabinoid receptor agonist ligands after chronic
treatment that induce tolerance to many pharmacological effects:
anticonvulsant activity, catalepsy, depression of locomotor activity,
hypothermia, hypotension, immunosuppression and static ataxia (Pertwee,
1991
, Pertwee et al., 1993
, Fan et al., 1994
, Fride, 1995
). In vivo, tolerance took place with a
significant decrease in the density of cannabinoid receptors in
striatal structures (Oviedo et al., 1993
, Rodriguez De
Fonseca et al., 1994
) in the cerebellum (Fan et
al., 1996
) and in the spleen (Massi et al., 1997
) as
well as in the levels of cannabinoid receptor mRNA (Rubino et
al., 1994
).
So far no detailed insights on the modulation of CB1 functions by cannabinoid ligands have been described in vitro. Therefore, in our report we have explored the adaptive changes in CB1 receptors after CP 55,940 or SR 141716 treatment in vitro. Their effects on CB1 receptor binding properties, CB1 receptor cell surface expression and their associated effects on CB1 receptor-coupled second messenger were investigated in a CHO cell line stably expressing the CB1 receptor. Our results show that exposure of CHO-CB1 cells to the agonist CP 55,940 leads to a desensitization of the CB1 receptor functions (forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and the MAP kinase activity). These effects were associated with agonist-promoted receptor internalization without modification of the total binding site number. By striking contrast MAPK signal transduction pathway was dramatically enhanced in SR 141716-pretreated CHO-CB1 cells. An effect that may be related to the observed receptor externalization to the plasma membrane from an intracellular pool in response to its binding with the inverse agonist SR 141716.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
Fatty acid-free BSA, IBMX and forskolin were from
Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Biofluor liquid scintillant and
[3H]-CP 55,940 (103.4 Ci/mmol) were purchased from New
England Nuclear Corporation (Paris, France). [3H]-SR
141716A (42 Ci/mmol),
33P ATP (112.9 Ci/mmol), cAMP
scintillant proximity assay, the enhanced chemiluminescence detection
system and Biotrack p42/p44 MAPK kits were from Amersham (Les Ulis,
France). RO
20-1724{4-[(3-butoxy-4-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-2-imidazolidinone} was purchased from Research Biochemicals Incorporated (Illkirch, France). SR 141716 [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide] and CP 55,940 {[1
,
2
-(R)-5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]-phenol} were synthesized at Sanofi Recherche. Drugs were dissolved in dimethyl
sulfoxide. The solvent was limited to a 0.1%-concentration (v/v) that
does not interfere in radioligand binding and second messenger assays.
Tissue culture reagents were from Gibco (Eragny, France). Culture
flasks (Costar and Falcon) were purchased from Dutscher (Brumath,
France) and Becton Dickinson (Le Pont de Claix, France).
Construction of expression vectors.
The CB1 coding
sequence (Shire et al., 1995
) was amplified by polymerase
chain reaction with a sense primer bearingHindIII sites and
Kozak consensus sequences
5'-CCACACAAGCTTGCCGCCACCATGAAGTCGATCCTAGATGGC and an
antisense primer carrying an EcoRI site,
5'-CCACTCGAATTCTCATCACAGAGCCTCGGCAG. The amplicons were digested with
HindIII/EcoRI to generate unique cloning sites
and inserted into p658, an expression plasmid derived from p7055
(Miloux and Lupker, 1994
) in which a polylinker replaced the IL-2
coding sequence. The expression vectors were of 7816 base pairs for
CB1. Constructs were all verified by dideoxy sequencing. The expression
vector of the CB1 carrying the supplementary 13-amino acid NH2-terminal
C-myc (MEQKLISEEDLKL) was generated as described in (Shire et
al., 1996
).
Expression of human CB1 receptor in CHO cells.
Vectors were
transfected into CHO dihydrofolate-reductase-negative cells by a
modified CaPO4 precipitation method (Graham and Van der Eb,
1973
). CHO cells were treated with trypsin 48 hr after transfection and
seeded at a density of 5 × 105 cells/dish onto
culture medium containing minimum essential medium-glutamine medium,
heat-inactivated dialyzed FCS (10%), gentamicin (20 mg/liter), L-proline (40 mg/liter), pyruvate sodium (0.5 mM) and
anti-PPLO agent (1%). After 10 days surviving clones were recovered
and cultivated in the same medium, selection consisting in binding assays on isolated membranes (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1996
).
For all assays, cells were seeded in 24-well cluster plates
(105 cells/well). Cells were used between the 3rd and the
20th passage.
Cell pretreatment. Cells were incubated at 37°C in culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS (control) or supplemented with 30 nM CP 55,940 or 10 nM SR 141716 for different time periods. Cells were washed thoroughly four times with 1 ml of washing buffer [25 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.5), 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.9 mM MgCl2, 4.5 g/liter glucose and 0.5% acid-free BSA], then tested for binding or cAMP assays. The washing protocol after incubation of the cells with the ligands, was optimized as checked by binding experiments with [3H]-CP 55,940. For MAPK assays, cells were maintained in culture medium containing 0.5% FCS for 24 hr before beginning of the treatment with CP 55,940 or SR 141716. For long-time exposure cells were first exposed to the drug for 24 or 48 hr in the presence of 10% FCS and then for 24 hr in the presence of 0.5% FCS.
Binding experiments. For binding assays, treated and untreated CHO-CB1 cells were washed and incubated at 37°C with [3H]-CP 55,940 (0.1 to 30 nM) or [3H]-SR 141716A (0.3 to 30 nM) in 0.5 ml of binding buffer [25 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.5), 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.9 mM MgCl2, 4.5 g/l glucose and 0.2% acid-free BSA] for 30 min. Rapid aspiration of the assay medium stopped the reaction. Cells were then rinsed (three times) with 1 ml of binding buffer. After addition of 0.1 M NaOH (2 × 0.5 ml), extracts were transferred and the radioactivity bound to the cells was counted with 4 ml of biofluor liquid scintillant. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM of their respective unlabeled ligand.
Immunolocalization of C-myc-CB1. Immunocytochemical fluorescence labeling of C-myc-CB1 was analyzed by FACS and confocal laser microscopy. For fluorescence activated cell sorter analysis, the CHO-C-myc-CB1 cells were grown for 24 hr in a 6-well plate, before the addition of cannabinoid ligands for various periods of time. At the end of treatment, the cells were washed in PBS and harvested with 5 ml ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. Washed cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with 1 µg/ml of 9E10 monoclonal antibody directed against C-myc epitope (Santa-Cruz). Cells were washed, incubated with 1/200 dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Immunochemical) for 30 min at 4°C, then washed and the fluorescence was analyzed by flow cytometry.
For microscopic analyses, the CHO-C-myc-CB1 cells were grown on 12-mm glass coverslips (Prolabo, Vaulx-en-Velin, France) and treated with cannabinoid ligands for various periods. Washed cells were incubated with 9E10 monoclonal antibody for 30 min at 4°C washed and incubated with 1/200 dilution of CY3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma Immunochemicals) for another 30 min at 4°C. After washing, coverslips were inverted and mounted on glass microscope slides using glycerol mountant containing the anti-bleaching reagent DABCO at 50 ng/ml (Sigma). Fluorescence analyses were performed using a confocal microscope (LSM410, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).cAMP measurements.
cAMP measures were carried out as already
described (Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1996
). Briefly, cells
were incubated for 5 min at 37°C in PBS containing 0.25% acid-free
BSA, IBMX (0.1 mM), RO 20-1724 (0.2 mM), with or without CP 55,940. Forskolin was added (3 µM final concentration) and cells were
incubated for 20 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by rapid
aspiration of the assay medium and addition of 1.5 ml of ice-cold 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, 4 mM ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. Dishes were
cooled on ice for 5 min and then the extracts were transferred to a
glass tube. Extracts were boiled and then centrifuged for 10 min at 3500 × g to eliminate cellular debris. Aliquots from
supernatants were dried and the cAMP concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay.
MAPK activity.
MAPK activity was measured as described
(Bouaboula et al., 1995a
). Briefly, 80% confluence grown
cells were maintained in culture medium containing 0.5% FCS for 24 hr
before the addition of ligands. Ligand-treated and vehicle-treated
CHO-CB1 cells were washed, then incubated at 37°C with or without CP
55,940 or SR 141716 for 10 min. Cells were then washed at 4°C with
0.5 ml of buffer A [50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
ethyleneglycol-bis-(
-aminoethyl ether) N,N,N',N-tetraacetic acid, 1 mM Na3 VO4] and lysed for 15 min in buffer A
supplemented with 1% triton X-100, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml,
leupeptin, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride.
Solubilized cell extracts were then clarified by centrifugation at
14,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Aliquots (15 µl)
were removed and stored at
80°C until use. Phosphorylation assays
were carried out at 30°C for 30 min (linear assay conditions) with
33P ATP using the Biotrack p42/p44 MAPK enzyme system.
The radioactivity incorporated was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Western-blot analysis. After stimulation, cells were washed and lysed in Laemmli's loading buffer containing 6 M urea. Proteins were run on sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose filters. Nonspecific binding of antibody was prevented by incubating filters in 5% dried milk powder in buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20). Phosphorylated MAPK isoforms (P-p42 and P-p44) were immunostained for 3 hr at room temperature using purified anti phospho Erk1/phospho Erk2 antiserum (1 µg/ml) (Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in buffer A saturated with 5% BSA. After extensive washings, the blot was subsequently incubated for 45 min at room temperature with a peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit-IgG antibody. After washing, immuno-stained MAPKs were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system according to the supplier's instructions and subjected to autoradiography.
Data analysis. EC50, IC50, Kd, Bmax, Ki and Hill coefficient (nH) were analyzed using a nonlinear curve fitting (Marquardt-Levenberg least-squares method) on a Compaq Desk Pro 4/66i computer. Experiments were all performed in duplicate (binding assays) or in triplicate (cAMP and MAPK activity measures).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Binding and functional properties of CP 55,940 and SR 141716 in CHO-CB1 cells. Specific binding of [3H]-CP 55,940 and [3H]-SR 141716A performed on whole CHO-CB1 cells at 37°C was time-dependent and reached a steady state within a 20-min incubation (data not shown). Binding of these two radioligands was concentration dependent, and the nonspecific binding, measured in the presence of 1 µM of their respective unlabeled ligand, was linearly dependent on the concentration of the radioligand used (10-20 and 45-50% of the total binding at 0.1 and 30 nM, respectively). The specific binding was saturable and reached a maximum of 10 to 15 nM for both ligands (fig. 1, A and B). The nonlinear regression analysis of the saturation curves revealed the presence of one class of binding sites exhibiting high affinity for both ligands. An apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) value of 5.47 ± 0.28 nM (13 experiments) and 4.84 ± 0.66 nM (10 experiments) was found for [3H]-CP 55,940 and [3H]-SR 141716A, respectively. The total binding site number (Bmax) varied from 1.5 to 3.5 × 106 receptors/cell. The specific [3H]-CP 55,940 binding on whole CHO-CB1 cells was displaced in a concentration-dependent manner by unlabeled CP 55,940 (Ki = 16.9 ± 1.1 nM; nH = 1.06 ± 0.11, 7 experiments) and SR 141716 (Ki = 11.5 ± 1.3 nM; nH = 1.13 ± 0.15, 14 experiments). Similar results were obtained for [3H]-SR 141716A (SR 141716, Ki = 9.0 ± 1.1 nM; nH = 1.15 ± 0.12, 5 experiments, CP 55,940, Ki = 39.2 ± 5.6 nM; nH = 0.80 ± 0.01, 6 experiments).
|
|
Effect of receptor ligands on modulation of CB1 expression. We used two approaches to examine the effects of CP 55,940 or SR 141716 exposure on CB1 expression: by measuring the ability of CHO-CB1 cells to bind either [3H]-CP 55,940 or [3H]-SR 141716 and by analyzing CB1 cell surface expression. The effects of treatment by CP 55,940 and SR 141716 on binding parameters (Kd, Bmax and Ki) of [3H]-CP 55,940 and [3H]-SR 141716A were evaluated after exposure of confluent CHO-CB1 cells to vehicle, CP 55,940 or SR 141716. To guarantee a complete removal of all drugs, we limited to 30 and 10 nM the maximum agonist (CP 55,940) or inverse agonist (SR 141716) concentration, respectively, and we optimized the washing protocol after incubation of the cells with the ligands, as checked by binding experiments with [3H]-CP 55,940. Figure 3 shows that no significant differences (P < .05) in the specific binding, measured with [3H]-CP 55,940 or [3H]-SR 141716A, were observed in CHO-CB1 cells exposed to either CP 55,940 or SR 141716 for different periods ranging from 30 min to 72 hr, compared to untreated control cells. The results obtained for the Kd and Bmax of [3H]-CP 55,940 and [3H]-SR 141716A, after short or long exposure with CP 55,940 or SR 141716 were reported in table 1. The Kd values were unchanged after treatment of CHO-CB1 cells with CP 55,940 or SR 141716. Similarly, the Ki value and the nH values of CP 55,940, measured at 0.4 nM [3H]-CP 55,940 in washed CHO-CB1 cells, were unchanged after 1 hr exposure with unlabeled CP 55,940 or SR 141716 (CP 55,940-treated cells, Ki of CP 55,940 = 10.41 ± 0.81 nM, nH = 0.85 ± 0.02; SR 141716-treated cells, Ki of CP 55,940 = 14.98 ± 1.50 nM, nH = 0.92 ± 0.08 vs. control cells, Ki of CP 55,940 = 13.20 ± 0.51 nM, nH = 1.07 ± 0.03, three experiments).
|
|
|
Effect of agonist or inverse agonist exposure on cAMP accumulation. We examined the effect of a permanent presence of agonist or inverse agonist on the coupling efficiency of CB1 to AC. First of all, we checked whether such a treatment per se affected the forskolin-induced cAMP production. Confluent CHO-CB1 cells were exposed to either vehicle, CP 55,940 or SR 141716 for variable periods of time ranging from 15 min to 72 hr. After treatment, the cells were extensively washed, and forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was determined. Pretreatment of CHO-CB1 cells with CP 55,940 led to a significant decrease in the ability of the adenylyl cyclase to be stimulated by forskolin. This effect which reflected the agonist effect of CP 55,940, began at 15 min (54% of inhibition), leveled off within 1 hr (69% of inhibition) and lasted at least 3 hr (33% of inhibition). After 6 hr, the stimulation exerted by forskolin was equivalent to that reached in untreated cells. In contrast, in SR 141716-treated CHO-CB1 cells a marked increase in the level of activation of the forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was observed in agreement with the blockage of autoactivated CB1 receptors by SR 141716. This effect was transient and was observed within the first 30 min of incubation with SR 141716 (56% of stimulation). Thereafter, the level of activation of forskolin was similar to that obtained for untreated cells.
We next determined the ability of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in cells pretreated with vehicle, CP 55,940 or SR 141716. As reported in table 2 and shown in figure 5, the ability of CP 55,940 to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated cAMP production was dramatically impaired upon CP 55,940 exposure. This loss of responsiveness was time dependent; it was significant (P < .05) within the first 15 min after the addition of the agonist and was maximum at 30 min up to 6 hr. Thereafter, the forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase became slightly sensitive to the inhibition by the cannabinoid agonist. As shown in figure 6, the agonist-induced desensitization was concentration dependent, with a maximal effect measured at 30 nM. By striking contrast, under the same experimental conditions, exposure of CHO-CB1 cells to 10 nM SR 141716 had no effect on the ability of CP 55,940 to inhibit cAMP accumulation in these cells whatever long the treatment was from 30 min to 72 hr (figs. 5 and 6). Both potency and the maximal inhibition in SR 141716-treated cells were similar as into control cells (table 2).
|
|
|
Effect of agonist or inverse agonist treatment on MAP kinase
activation.
We also studied the effect of sustained CP 55,940 or
SR 141716 treatment of CHO-CB1 on MAPK activity. We first examined the effect of such a treatment on the basal level of MAPK. Growth arrested
CHO-CB1 cells were pretreated for different periods ranging from 30 min
to 72 hr in the presence of vehicle, CP 55,940 or SR 141716. After
treatment, cells were extensively washed, and the basal MAPK activity
was determined. As shown in figure 7A, pretreatment of CHO-CB1 cells with 30 nM CP 55,940 causes a significant 2-fold enhancement of the basal activity of the enzyme. This effect was
maximal at 1 hr and lasted 3 hr. This reflects the transient activation
of MAPK by the cannabinoid agonist. In contrast, the treatment of the
cells by 10 nM of SR 141716 had no significant effect on the basal
activity of the enzyme. Then we assessed the effect of agonist on
receptor responsiveness to stimulate MAPK on cells that have been
pretreated with CP 55,940 or SR 141716. As reported in table
3, the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP
55,940 is able to increase the MAP kinase activity by about 3-fold in untreated cells with an EC50 value varying from 2.3 to 4.7 nM. Exposure of the cells to CP 55,940 resulted in a marked decrease (P < .05) in CP 55,940 efficiency to stimulate the MAP kinase activity (no stimulation at 10
7 M). This effect was
time-dependent with the addition of the agonist, and maximal 1 hr after
the beginning of the experiment and maintained unchanged after up to 72 hr. By contrast incubation of cells with SR 141716 led to sensitization
of CB1-coupled MAPK as indicated by an increase in maximal activities.
This effect which was maximal 1 hr after the treatment by SR 141716, was maintained up to 72 hr. This result suggested an enhancement of CB1
receptor response by the agonist (table 3). As shown in figure 7
changes in CP 55,940 or SR 141716-modulated MAPK activation in CHO-CB1
cells were concentration dependent, with a maximal effect measured at 30 nM for CP 55,940 (fig. 7B) and 10 nM for SR 141716 (fig. 7C). The
activated forms of MAPKs were phosphorylated on both Tyr and Thr
residues (Anderson et al., 1990
) and were readily detectable on immunoblotting using an antiserum directed against these
phosphorylated forms of MAPKs. Figure 7D shows that CP 55,940 pretreatment induced a complete desensitization of CB1 receptors
whereas the pretreatment with SR 1417176 induced an up-regulation of CP
55,940 induced phosphorylated p42 and p44 MAPKs.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this report, we studied CB1 receptor regulation induced by the
agonist CP 55,940 or the antagonist SR 141716 in stably transfected CHO
cells expressing CB1. Direct binding experiments of
[3H]-CP 55,940 and [3H]-SR 141716A to CHO
cells expressing the human CB1 (CHO-CB1 cells), showed that both
ligands bind to one class of specific binding sites (Bmax = 1.5 to 3.5 × 106 receptors/cell) in a saturable
manner with high affinity (Kd = 5.47 ± 0.28 nM and 4.84 ± 0.66 nM for [3H]-CP 55,940 and
[3H]-SR 141716A, respectively). Expression of the cloned
receptor CB1 in CHO cells results in agonist-independent activation
that is decreased by the antagonist SR 141716 that has negative
intrinsic activity and is referred to as an inverse agonist. These
conclusions emerged from observation on two independent-signaling
pathways: G
-mediated MAPK and
G
i-mediated AC responses. First, we showed that the
basal level of MAPK activity was enhanced in CHO cells after
transfection of CB1 receptors (Bouaboula et al., 1997
) and
this increase was reversed by treatment with SR 141716. Second, we
showed that SR 141716 prevented the inhibition of AC mediated by
autoactivated CB1 receptors. In addition, we observed that the coupling
of the CB1 receptors with the adenylyl cyclase through
G
i is more efficient than the coupling with the MAP kinase signaling pathway depending on G
.
Exposure to CP 55,940 induced CB1 desensitization.
To study
receptor localization we used a chimeric protein designed with the CB1
and a peptide derived from C-myc. We verified that the presence of
fusion of the N-terminus of the CB1 to C-myc peptide did not alter
receptor ligand binding affinity and signal transduction
(Rinaldi-Carmona et al., 1996
).
3 AR is less prone to the down-regulation
that occurs after a long-term exposure to the agonist (Thomas et
al., 1992
- and
-adrenergic (Scarpace and Abrass, 1982Exposure to SR 141716 induced CB1 sensitization.
Incubation of
cells expressing CB1 with SR 141716 did not affect CB1 receptor density
and affinity constant measured by binding assays. Despite this
similarity with CP 55,940, treatment with SR 141716 induced a
completely different scenario. In CHO cells expressing the
epitope-tagged CB1, exposure to inverse agonist causes a substantial
alteration in the cellular distribution profile of the receptor by
up-regulating the density of cell surface receptors. The rate of
externalization of CB1 is rapid with a maximal enhancement by about 30 min, as determined by the increase in mean surface receptor
fluorescence intensity measured using flow cytometry. Such an increase
in receptor density at the cell surface requires either synthesis of
new receptors or translocation of intracellular pools of intact
receptors. We favored this latter possibility because treatment with SR
141716 had no significant effect on the total population of CB1. We
also showed that exposure of cells to SR 141716 resulted in a rapid and
pronounced sensitization of the agonist-induced MAPK activity whereas
the ability of the agonist-inhibited AC was not affected. The inverse
agonist-induced sensitization was concentration-dependent with an
EC50 = 2 nM. This demonstrated that 1) up-regulation of the
G protein-coupled receptor can occur in response to binding with
inverse agonist and 2) inverse agonist can enhance subsequent
responsiveness to agonist stimulation. The explanation why
sensitization was only apparent on MAPK and not on AC may be that
maximal effect was already reached in control CHO-CB1 cells in which
agonist induced 100% inhibition in cAMP accumulation. Another
possibility that remains to be explored could be that inverse agonist
pretreatment switches the coupling of the receptor to a different G
protein leading to a stronger response through the 
subunit.
2
adrenergic receptor were comparable to the agonist-dependent
phosphorylation of the receptor. We have previously and rigorously
demonstrated (Bouaboula et al., 1997| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication July 2, 1998.
Received for publication February 2, 1998.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Murielle Rinaldi-Carmona, Sanofi Recherche, 371 rue du Professeur J Blayac, 34184, Montpellier Cedex, France.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
AC, adenylyl cyclase;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin;
CB1, central cannabinoid receptor;
CB2, peripheral cannabinoid
receptor;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
GPCR, G-protein coupled receptor;
IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
9-THC, tetrahydrocannabinol.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
)-1-(4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane.
Mol Pharmacol
44:
725-730[Abstract].
2-adrenoceptor as substrates and inhibitors of the
-adrenoceptor kinase.
Br J Pharmacol
30:
3S-12S.
2 receptor from human fibroblasts.
J Biol Chem
271:
32366-32374
2-adrenoreceptor in transfected neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid cells.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
1479-1486[Abstract].
9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2.
J Pharmacol Exp Ter
271:
1383-1390.
9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
Brain Res
697:
83-90[Medline].
9-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
47:
33-40[Medline].
3-adrenergic receptor expression via multiple cAMP response elements.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
4490-4494
2-adrenergic receptors between the plasma membrane and endosomes containing transferrin receptors.
J Biol Chem
267:
3530-3538This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. M. Morozov, M. Torii, and P. Rakic Origin, Early Commitment, Migratory Routes, and Destination of Cannabinoid Type 1 Receptor-Containing Interneurons Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2009; 19(suppl_1): i78 - i89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zheng, A. M. Bode, Q. Zhao, Y.-Y. Cho, F. Zhu, W.-Y. Ma, and Z. Dong The Cannabinoid Receptors Are Required for Ultraviolet-Induced Inflammation and Skin Cancer Development Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3992 - 3998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Turu, A. Simon, P. Gyombolai, L. Szidonya, G. Bagdy, Z. Lenkei, and L. Hunyady The Role of Diacylglycerol Lipase in Constitutive and Angiotensin AT1 Receptor-stimulated Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Activity J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 7753 - 7757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ellis, J. D. Pediani, M. Canals, S. Milasta, and G. Milligan Orexin-1 Receptor-Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Heterodimerization Results in Both Ligand-dependent and -independent Coordinated Alterations of Receptor Localization and Function J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38812 - 38824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Sim-Selley, N. S. Schechter, W. K. Rorrer, G. D. Dalton, J. Hernandez, B. R. Martin, and D. E. Selley Prolonged Recovery Rate of CB1 Receptor Adaptation after Cessation of Long-Term Cannabinoid Administration Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 986 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Leterrier, J. Laine, M. Darmon, H. Boudin, J. Rossier, and Z. Lenkei Constitutive activation drives compartment-selective endocytosis and axonal targeting of type 1 cannabinoid receptors. J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3141 - 3153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. McLemore, R. Z. B. Cooper, K. A. Richardson, A. V. Mason, C. Marshall, F. J. Northington, and E. B. Gauda Cannabinoid receptor expression in peripheral arterial chemoreceptors during postnatal development J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2004; 97(4): 1486 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Leterrier, D. Bonnard, D. Carrel, J. Rossier, and Z. Lenkei Constitutive Endocytic Cycle of the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 36013 - 36021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Andersson, A. M. D'Antona, D. A. Kendall, G. Von Heijne, and C.-N. Chin Membrane Assembly of the Cannabinoid Receptor 1: Impact of a Long N-Terminal Tail Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2003; 64(3): 570 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hilairet, M. Bouaboula, D. Carriere, G. Le Fur, and P. Casellas Hypersensitization of the Orexin 1 Receptor by the CB1 Receptor: EVIDENCE FOR CROSS-TALK BLOCKED BY THE SPECIFIC CB1 ANTAGONIST, SR141716 J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23731 - 23737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Esposito, A. Ligresti, A. A. Izzo, T. Bisogno, M. Ruvo, M. Di Rosa, V. Di Marzo, and T. Iuvone The Endocannabinoid System Protects Rat Glioma Cells Against HIV-1 Tat Protein-induced Cytotoxicity. MECHANISM AND REGULATION J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50348 - 50354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Zaki, D. E. Keith Jr., J. B. Thomas, F. I. Carroll, and C. J. Evans Agonist-, Antagonist-, and Inverse Agonist-Regulated Trafficking of the delta -Opioid Receptor Correlates with, but Does Not Require, G Protein Activation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2001; 298(3): 1015 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Coutts, S. Anavi-Goffer, R. A. Ross, D. J. MacEwan, K. Mackie, R. G. Pertwee, and A. J. Irving Agonist-Induced Internalization and Trafficking of Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors in Hippocampal Neurons J. Neurosci., April 1, 2001; 21(7): 2425 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||